@blargers123 I think you are thinking of the Symphony No. 1. This concerto was written for Rachmaninoff's graduation from the Moscow Conservatoire and was then revised extensively in 1917. But by all accounts, it was a success.
@bryan16love6love He does not fall into the category of a musician who merely plays his instrument, but rather a man who creates an atmosphere out of notes, writes history in our faces and keeps the tone simply magical and heavenly. And I am a musician, I play Jazz. Just to let you know, along with Prokofiev, Rachmninoff is the only classical music I listen to. No Bach, no Mozart, no Haydn.
@Criticalperspective2 are you a musician then? you must answer yes to have any credibility. and if you answer yes, how do you compare to rachmaninoff? what on earth makes you think you should say something like that? he gave us so much. what about you?
Amazing that this old recording made more than five decades ago has much more LIFE in it than most contemporary recordings all together. It talks and sings directly to our hearts.
I used to hear his works on the radio all the time, and the guy who would say his name sounded like he was saying "Brachmarkinov." FINALLY! I found this took me forever though.
I've always loved this concerto, not just for its ardent lyricism but also for its disciplined structure. Also it shows the venerable composer/pianist in his full glory.
Beautiful concerto. Not necessarily up-to-par with his following two concertos (in my humble opinion), but nevertheless, an awe-inspiring work of art for a novice composer in his early adulthood.
One of the major complaints of this concerto is that its structure is too much like Grieg's Piano Concerto in A minor. But that was what he intended for the conservatory assignment.
It is normal for people to listen to Rachmaninov and Scriabin and Russian romantic composers with little or no knowledge of musical theory? Cuz, frankly, I don't know shit, but it's my favorite genre.
Rachmaninov admired the Grieg concerto and made no secret of the fact he tried to emulate it with his first concerto. Listen to the original, unrevised version and you hear the similarity.
Apparently Rachmaninoff wrote this Concerto while her was still a student at the Conservatory. His instructors were NOT enthusiastic about this piece, claiming that it "lacked originality..."
So Rachmaninoff put the Concerto away for many years. But he revised it later in his life.
I absolutely love this piece! I find it extremely original, and quite gorgeous. (Perhaps his instructors were just jealous.)
I think his instructors had a point. It's almost a complete rip off the Grieg Concerto. It is rather unoriginal, but I agree that it is gorgeous. The Second Concerto is the best of the three, IMHO.
Grieg's Piano Concerto is usually associated with Schumann's. Now those two are similar in melody, structure, and were composed roughly at the same time.
But each is still very distinctive, and neither is "a rip-off" of the other.
For one thing it wasn't performed very often, while the 2nd and 3rd grew in popularity. Also, the first edition isn't quite so good, the second has revised texture and is much more effective.
From what I know, Rachmaninov performed it, and the audience hated it. So he thought he'd never be a composer. Didn't get published until he reworked it many years later
The conducter that was conducting the orchestra was believed to be drunk at the time and basically ruined it. Rachmaninov was in a state of depression after his first symphony.
I've read nowhere that people hated his first piano concerto. (He did revise it, however.)
The first concerto was recieved well by critics and teachers. He was invited to perform it in Moscow but he turned down the oppertunity saying he wanted to write a concerto of higher quality for something like that.
This concert is absolutely a mesterpiece of a genius.Very beautiful from the first note until the last.Tlanigan you will have great pleasure in studying and performing it.
I'm not quite sure but it is the easier of the three in my opinoin, the rach 3 is near impossible and the rach 2 isn't exactly a walk in the park either. I've just started learning the rach 1 and it's not too hard, just have to watch the accuracy and fingering as always. : )
By the way, Rach's piano concertos are 4 and not 3. The "easiest" (yeah right) is the 4th and according to Rach the 2nd had "too many notes to be learned" and was the hardest; (quoting from memory, I read this somewhere). Tradition wants the 3rd to be the hardest. You can get a straight answer only from whom played all4 pc's (ask Ashkenazy;-)
2 is harder to get down on the fingers. 1 and 3, once you got it in then it's in. 4 has the difficulty of 1 and 2 where it's strange to get into the fingers and hard to play.
The pianist and collaboration with the orchestra is much harder for 1 and 4.
Arturo Michelangelini has a remarkable Rach 4 and he is very picky in detail. I don't believe I've heard another recording of Rach 4 played around that caliber that gives us the nice episodic transition. So I say 4 is hardest.
In Horowitz's opinion Rachmaninoff's interpretation of this concerto was superb and better than his interpretations of his other concerti. Only one (weighty) opnion of course, but I happen to agree. Thanks for posting!
I would like to paraphrase something Nikolai Lugansky said. He stated that Rachmaninoff's interpretation is incomparable and unatainable compared to others. How True. No one can ever match to the composer's own vision of the piece. Rachmaninoff is an absolutely brilliant wonderful musician, especially in his own works such as this. As Gyorgy Sandor said of Rachmaninoff, "He played music as freely as it should be." Rachmaninoff's legacy will forever be appreciated by musicians!!!
@pianist003 Lugansky said that probably because his interpretations of Rach are very different, in the wrong direction. Understandable that Rach can not be matched, not just in the composer's own vision but in all aspects of piano performance that matter. Performers can at least try to show more musicality and pianism.
The 2nd movement of this work is one of the most beautiful I've ever heard. I used to play at it...and dream....I have all 3 of his 1930's recordings of his concerti...I treasure them (33-1/3)...I wonder how his left hand and Liszt's right hand would have worked...lordy what a thought...
I've become acquainted with Rachmaninov just at an age, when he wrote this Concerto, and in Moscow, just before departing to St. Petersburg. This is the most fresh among the 4 concertos, I think. Maybe he sought that freshness in the 3 consecutive Concertos, but unfortuanetly impossibly - youth can't be revived... For me, this Concerto is St.Petersburg, the young and beautiful, eternal city, and will ever remain. Thanks for posting!
What is this recording-- I just got it on a 1961 vinyl from the Akkopa label 04646-04647.
samoged 2 weeks ago
quite a pity, this piece got scathing reviews at its debut. Sent rachmaninoff into depression for quite awhile.
blargers123 1 month ago
@blargers123 I think you are thinking of the Symphony No. 1. This concerto was written for Rachmaninoff's graduation from the Moscow Conservatoire and was then revised extensively in 1917. But by all accounts, it was a success.
violavonschnitzel 1 month ago 2
that's wild , that is true
GA4N 1 month ago
I don't know how it is but I prefer Zimerman's performance more than this :)))
Excrey 1 month ago
Is this the easiest of all his concertos??
NightClash909 1 month ago
This sounds like fluctuating young hearts.
0011486 1 month ago
Oh,thank you very much!! I love it so much.....I love No.1
princessyaegakihime 1 month ago
Rachmaninoff is good at playing Rachmaninoff.
svardiashvili 2 months ago 2
@svardiashvili well of course, he wrote the music. Therefore he know all the original intentions behind it.
quinn244 1 month ago
what man who has only half a taste for music doesn't like this video?
TheMrsVonnie 2 months ago
great, but his second concerto is much more incredible
JOEdoesThings22 6 months ago
@JOEdoesThings22 I would say that this is better than the second, it's maybe the best piece that Rachmaninoff ever composed.
PhillyB702 1 month ago
I'm not saying Rachmaninoff was bad, but he just wasn't a musician.
Criticalperspective2 7 months ago
@Criticalperspective2 what on earth does that mean
bryan16love6love 7 months ago
@bryan16love6love He's not a musician but the god of harmony. No need to ask all those rhetorical questions :)
Criticalperspective2 7 months ago
Comment removed
bryan16love6love 7 months ago
Comment removed
bryan16love6love 7 months ago
@Criticalperspective2 actually none were rhetorical, i sincerely would like to know your opinion
bryan16love6love 7 months ago
Comment removed
Criticalperspective2 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bryan16love6love He does not fall into the category of a musician who merely plays his instrument, but rather a man who creates an atmosphere out of notes, writes history in our faces and keeps the tone simply magical and heavenly. And I am a musician, I play Jazz. Just to let you know, along with Prokofiev, Rachmninoff is the only classical music I listen to. No Bach, no Mozart, no Haydn.
Criticalperspective2 7 months ago
@Criticalperspective2 are you a musician then? you must answer yes to have any credibility. and if you answer yes, how do you compare to rachmaninoff? what on earth makes you think you should say something like that? he gave us so much. what about you?
bryan16love6love 7 months ago
If only I spent as much time practicing Rachmaninoff Concertos as I did listening to them. I would be a lot further than I am, that is for sure.
fierydog 8 months ago in playlist Rachmaninoff Piano Concerto 1-4
Jamais entendu comme celà,et pour cause!..
abracadabranque 8 months ago
Amazing that this old recording made more than five decades ago has much more LIFE in it than most contemporary recordings all together. It talks and sings directly to our hearts.
veimar15 10 months ago 2
Absolutely gorgeous.
ModelsWebTv. com
otiscort 11 months ago
This concerto deserves to be played & listened to much more often.
trschaefer 1 year ago
I used to hear his works on the radio all the time, and the guy who would say his name sounded like he was saying "Brachmarkinov." FINALLY! I found this took me forever though.
chrisjurey666 1 year ago 2
I've always loved this concerto, not just for its ardent lyricism but also for its disciplined structure. Also it shows the venerable composer/pianist in his full glory.
meredith218461 1 year ago
I feel like it's cheesy to say this, but I'm ridiculously moved by this piece. It wraps me up in its emotion and just sweeps me away.
HuttonGlutton 1 year ago 2
For me it's just amazing that I have the privilege to listen to this.
Modern technology does a lot of bad, but it also does a lot of good - and this is a prime of example of the phenomenal good it can make possible.
mmoynan 1 year ago
Beautiful, wonderful! Always loved his 1st concerto :D Thank you for sharing.
barbarossa333 1 year ago
Beautiful concerto. Not necessarily up-to-par with his following two concertos (in my humble opinion), but nevertheless, an awe-inspiring work of art for a novice composer in his early adulthood.
One of the major complaints of this concerto is that its structure is too much like Grieg's Piano Concerto in A minor. But that was what he intended for the conservatory assignment.
TheOutcome7 1 year ago
It is normal for people to listen to Rachmaninov and Scriabin and Russian romantic composers with little or no knowledge of musical theory? Cuz, frankly, I don't know shit, but it's my favorite genre.
elpapaya94 1 year ago 2
@elpapaya94 yes most likely unlikely 2 like schoenberg 4 u tho
Gargantupimp 1 year ago
A masterpiece played by the master.
AbartsWorld 1 year ago
I hear the Grieg influence, but it's definitely Rachmaninoff
werq34ac 2 years ago
I don't care what people have said about this concerto , I just like it a lot .
Dennischek 2 years ago 8
Rachmaninov admired the Grieg concerto and made no secret of the fact he tried to emulate it with his first concerto. Listen to the original, unrevised version and you hear the similarity.
JohnTheRails 2 years ago
why was this concerto neglected when it was first published? Anyone know?
rankfrankrank 2 years ago
Apparently Rachmaninoff wrote this Concerto while her was still a student at the Conservatory. His instructors were NOT enthusiastic about this piece, claiming that it "lacked originality..."
So Rachmaninoff put the Concerto away for many years. But he revised it later in his life.
I absolutely love this piece! I find it extremely original, and quite gorgeous. (Perhaps his instructors were just jealous.)
trschaefer 2 years ago
I think his instructors had a point. It's almost a complete rip off the Grieg Concerto. It is rather unoriginal, but I agree that it is gorgeous. The Second Concerto is the best of the three, IMHO.
ixd735 2 years ago
"It's almost a complete rip off the Grieg Concerto"
Sorry but that is utter nonsense.
anthony9325 2 years ago
Rachmaninoff admitted it himself. It can't be total nonsense.
ixd735 2 years ago
No. Rachmaninov may have said he used the style of that concerto in its opening bars, and followed some of its general structure.
That doesn't make it a ripp-off, i.e. a bad imitation.
The tow pieces are diametrically different.
A Mercedes isn't a BMW ripoff because it has the same size engine and is built to similar standards.
Rach's style is fundamentally Russian and typical to him, also in this early work, whereas Grieg's inspiration is scandinavian.
anthony9325 2 years ago
Grieg's Piano Concerto is usually associated with Schumann's. Now those two are similar in melody, structure, and were composed roughly at the same time.
But each is still very distinctive, and neither is "a rip-off" of the other.
anthony9325 2 years ago
OK... so perhaps not a "rip-off," but it's practically a derivative work...
ixd735 2 years ago
...and by best of the three, I mean best of the four.
ixd735 2 years ago
Only in the sense that hundreds of great works throughout history are. It says nothing about the works quality or originality.
debrucey 2 years ago
Ummm Rach wrote 4 piano concertos, not 3.
Killmajoro 2 years ago
For one thing it wasn't performed very often, while the 2nd and 3rd grew in popularity. Also, the first edition isn't quite so good, the second has revised texture and is much more effective.
trigalg693 2 years ago
Well the instructors were indeed not to enthusiastic about it, but most of the critics loved it
24link135 2 years ago
From what I know, Rachmaninov performed it, and the audience hated it. So he thought he'd never be a composer. Didn't get published until he reworked it many years later
ciliaspippi 2 years ago
I hope we're talking about his first symphony.
The conducter that was conducting the orchestra was believed to be drunk at the time and basically ruined it. Rachmaninov was in a state of depression after his first symphony.
I've read nowhere that people hated his first piano concerto. (He did revise it, however.)
84Fish48Fish 2 years ago
The first concerto was recieved well by critics and teachers. He was invited to perform it in Moscow but he turned down the oppertunity saying he wanted to write a concerto of higher quality for something like that.
debrucey 2 years ago
I don't know how much Rachmaninoff was tall but i know he had 2 BIG HANDS perfect for his 4\5 notes accords :)
miliona1re 2 years ago
he was 6'6
eltachimetro 2 years ago
He could play a 12th easily. With his left hand he could play the chord C Eb G C G
Libertein818 2 years ago
Jesus! I can't even do C Eb G C Eb!
colourfulwithaU 2 years ago
yeah i can omly just make that, and thats stretching it.
Libertein818 2 years ago
Imagine the size of his balls.
debrucey 2 years ago 4
This concert is absolutely a mesterpiece of a genius.Very beautiful from the first note until the last.Tlanigan you will have great pleasure in studying and performing it.
miliona1re 2 years ago
Just about to start this concerto over the summer!!! Can't wait
tlanigan 2 years ago 13
thank you. :-)
angelwhite9 2 years ago
how hard is this concerto compared to the other rach ones?
maydengarNSBHS 2 years ago
I'm not quite sure but it is the easier of the three in my opinoin, the rach 3 is near impossible and the rach 2 isn't exactly a walk in the park either. I've just started learning the rach 1 and it's not too hard, just have to watch the accuracy and fingering as always. : )
Libertein818 2 years ago
By the way, Rach's piano concertos are 4 and not 3. The "easiest" (yeah right) is the 4th and according to Rach the 2nd had "too many notes to be learned" and was the hardest; (quoting from memory, I read this somewhere). Tradition wants the 3rd to be the hardest. You can get a straight answer only from whom played all4 pc's (ask Ashkenazy;-)
voolare 2 years ago 2
I think the 4th is probably the easiest. I've heard and tried to play it, and in comparison to the first 3, it's no where near as difficult.
ixd735 2 years ago
I know people who say the 1st is harder than the 2nd but I spose it depends what your technique is like.
debrucey 2 years ago
@debrucey
2 is harder to get down on the fingers. 1 and 3, once you got it in then it's in. 4 has the difficulty of 1 and 2 where it's strange to get into the fingers and hard to play.
The pianist and collaboration with the orchestra is much harder for 1 and 4.
Arturo Michelangelini has a remarkable Rach 4 and he is very picky in detail. I don't believe I've heard another recording of Rach 4 played around that caliber that gives us the nice episodic transition. So I say 4 is hardest.
IVlr3vil 1 year ago
Isn't there a version of this concerto whith only the piano playing?
musicsavage 2 years ago
Fantastic piece. Beautiful, passionate, I love it!
earthatic 3 years ago 3
How tall was rachmaninoff?
opus43rhap 3 years ago
6'6''
castout888 3 years ago
woah!he's really tall.
opus43rhap 3 years ago
the second movement of this piece is amazing. does anyone have a video of it? i cant seem to find one :(
phiastardust 3 years ago
Lol I have posted one :) It should be in the realted videos section
violavonschnitzel 3 years ago 3
@violavonschnitzel It's not
Arfat 11 months ago
Rachmaninov is a god...
stefannestoroski 3 years ago
In Horowitz's opinion Rachmaninoff's interpretation of this concerto was superb and better than his interpretations of his other concerti. Only one (weighty) opnion of course, but I happen to agree. Thanks for posting!
Poekiemolens 3 years ago 6
I think that Horowitz definitely had something there :)
violavonschnitzel 3 years ago 2
weighty by today's standards, but not to Rach's.
EcliptoSpa 3 years ago
@Poekiemolens
When you are the composer, it is not an interpretation. But I know what you mean.
RandDguy 10 months ago
* unattainable
5 Stars
pianist003 3 years ago
I would like to paraphrase something Nikolai Lugansky said. He stated that Rachmaninoff's interpretation is incomparable and unatainable compared to others. How True. No one can ever match to the composer's own vision of the piece. Rachmaninoff is an absolutely brilliant wonderful musician, especially in his own works such as this. As Gyorgy Sandor said of Rachmaninoff, "He played music as freely as it should be." Rachmaninoff's legacy will forever be appreciated by musicians!!!
pianist003 3 years ago 14
@pianist003 Indeed
estagonandfire 1 year ago
@pianist003 Lugansky said that probably because his interpretations of Rach are very different, in the wrong direction. Understandable that Rach can not be matched, not just in the composer's own vision but in all aspects of piano performance that matter. Performers can at least try to show more musicality and pianism.
barbarossa333 11 months ago
@pianist003 I couldnt agree with you more
estagonandfire 3 months ago
i love this concerto for me this and the 3rd ar the most beautiful
ieronim2003 3 years ago 2
The 2nd movement of this work is one of the most beautiful I've ever heard. I used to play at it...and dream....I have all 3 of his 1930's recordings of his concerti...I treasure them (33-1/3)...I wonder how his left hand and Liszt's right hand would have worked...lordy what a thought...
ffurgy 3 years ago 5
Ha ha what a thought indeed :)
violavonschnitzel 3 years ago
I've become acquainted with Rachmaninov just at an age, when he wrote this Concerto, and in Moscow, just before departing to St. Petersburg. This is the most fresh among the 4 concertos, I think. Maybe he sought that freshness in the 3 consecutive Concertos, but unfortuanetly impossibly - youth can't be revived... For me, this Concerto is St.Petersburg, the young and beautiful, eternal city, and will ever remain. Thanks for posting!
DanielLaszloKovacs 3 years ago 2
No problem!
I'm glad to see someone who appreciates Rach's 1st so much.
violavonschnitzel 3 years ago