Most of these comments are debating u guys need to chill and just watch this dam video and some of u guys said almost the same thing in every comment but switched up the words...
@IncrediblyStupidName See. Here you are thinking humans have bad plumbing, with the amusement park right next to the sewage treatment plant; but birds have only a single orifice that handles everything.
@WHATABOUTUS18 I love animals as much as the next person but how is this cruel? Aren't they just inseminating the birds? If you don't like it, don't eat it, I'm just saying.
So long as people want to eat them, other people will have to rear them. Its part of their job, its natural.
@kimchidream - It's cruel from my way of seeing recognising that these turkeys are just being used as nothing more than a resource for man. And being stuck indoors. That isn't natural. It is probably that there is some suffering. I can think of plenty of comparisons which use your thinking where you wouldn't think it is natural. e.g. some people like to watch bullfighting, and other people carry it out, so you think bullfighting is natural? The word becomes meaningless.
@Pommit I'm sorry I must not have made myself clear. We need food. Turkeys are food. We need turkeys. We need lots of turkeys. To make lots of turkeys we need to have lots of pregnant turkeys. Turkeys aren't always in the mood to have fun in their free time. We have to make turkeys pregnant so we inseminate them. Fighting bulls aren't natural, pregnant turkeys are.
Again, if you can't deal with this, just do your part for turkeys by not eating them. I'm sure they'll appreciate it very much.
@kimchidream - Whereas I see it as this. We need food. We don't need meat and to use animals as a food source is to use them a resource. Any part of the food production using meat is immoral. It becomes cruel is where it involves suffering. It would not involve much suffering at all and it would be very brief, but dangling these animals upside down would be undesirable to them. But it is part of parcel of the disgusting intensive farming practice where there is much worse going on.
@Pommit I'd recommend you check out Onision's channel if you haven't already because he's big on the whole Eating-Meat-Is-Gross-So-Go-Vegetarian shit too. I'm not a vegetarian nor am I a vegan- All my life I've lived on a mainly carnivorous diet with some greens and fruits thrown in there because I love eating dead animal flesh so on this we must agree to disagree.
@kimchidream - At least you're eating your greens and staying healthy. Well done. Hehe. I would seriously recommend Peter Singer's books. But yes, I understand yours and others points of view, I ate meat until recently and loved the taste. Steaks taste great. I agree with you on that. But it doesn't make it right to eat them. I can no longer justify having cows, pigs, and chickens killed just because they are tasty.
@Pommit Food chain. Animals eat other animals in order to survive, try convincing a lion to go vegetarian. The world needs balance, and by having animals eat other animals that are breeding too fast we are achieving that balance, if no one ate meat then these animals would go die and rot somewhere and create mass disease.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - We have the ability to determine where we place ourselves in the food chain, precisely because we can be convinced unless the lion. The lion does not understand morality. But we don't need meat to survive. As to your second point, I do think you are being naive. The land would not be overrun by animals were they not to be eaten. Meat consumption was much less one hundred years ago than today, cows and pigs didn't overun the place. There are more farm animals now than ever.
@Pommit And so you want to place yourself at the bottom of the food chain? And of course food consumption was less back then, you'd think so when there is 5 times as many of us now as there was back then, now we BREED more animals because there's a lot more of us which equals higher demand, why would they breed the same amounts of animals back then when there's only about 1/5 of the population we have now? When did I say we'd be overrun by animals? I said since their meat wasn't being
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Why would it matter where in the food chain we are? It isn't a contest. I don't think any of the other animals care what we do. No, I said that meat consumption was far less. It is only in the last fifty years that the proportion of meat consumer compared with non-meat foodstuffs has rocketed. You said they would be breeding too fast. But these animals won't be breeding too fast. Without intensive farming for starters, there would be far fewer animals.
@Pommit - You are right in saying that as population has increased there is a greater demand for meat though. But it is beside the point. It seems you are contradicting yourself when you talk of 'breeding too fast' as the logical conclusion of your view is that the HUMAN population has to increase to cope with the increased breeding of animals. But as you know, it is us who are overbreeding and want more animals.
@Pommit Animals breed without the help of humans you know. Why do you think there is such things as rabbit seasons and duck seasons? To keep their population under control, imagine if no one was hunting these? we'd be overrun by them in no time. Logic isn't the only thing, it's also knowledge and common sense, And of course this is a competition, it's called survival of the fittest, how many herbivores do you see at the top of the food chain?
@TwistedxL3G3ND And if you really wanted to I'm sure you could put yourself somewhere else in the food chain, try running into a pack of lionesses looking to feed their young.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Rabbit populations DO get out of control, precisely because they have been introduced into areas many years ago where there has been little predation and they do breed very quickly. Not the case with ducks. And not the case with the animals we eat. By your reckoning, as I keep saying, there would be far more animals around hundreds of years ago because there less people. But this is all irrelevant for a couple of reasons. One is that we don't eat animals because...
@TwistedxL3G3ND - You don't see any herbivores at the top of the food chain. What is your point? It sounds like you feel some strange pride from being at the top. Would you feel your pride would be hurt if you relegated yourself down this chain?
@Pommit ...because there will be too many of them if we don't. They are eaten because they taste good. It was never as if humans took a look around and realised the land was being swamped by too many pigs and cows and decided the best way to deal with the problem was to eat them.
@Pommit Are you implying that people are the only things that eat meat? well they aren't, i said if no one ate meat, that includes animals. You don't think the animal population would grow if no animal was ever eaten? Well then you are ignorant, and my point still stands as even thought we have hunting seasons, populations still get out of control, if we were all vegans then the rabbit population would keep on growing and cause a natural in balance. you are defying the balance of nature itself..
@TwistedxL3G3ND For some moral high ground, and that is completely idiotic.
And no, back then we ate meat to survive, You think cavemen got some chicken and species and made some Chicken Parmesan? you think raw lizard meat tasted delicious? Again, common sense. Survival of the fittest. Food chain. If you don't like being on top, there is always the lioness option.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Actually, I don't really know what you are talking about when you go on about cavemen and parmedan and raw lizard meat. You sound a bit incoherent and your comment about the lioness doesn't make sense at all. You seem to be fixated on the subject of food chain, as if it some grand achievement and something to be proud about. Pride has nothing to do with it. Morality has. If we only kill because something tastes nice then that's not a good enough reason.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Not implying that at all. Are you under the impression that cows, pigs, and lambs are our prey in the same way a lion hunts a gazelle, i.e. that we are born to eat these animals in the same way that tigers and lions eat animals? The facts don't bear that out when you look at the evolution of man and our dietary needs. Anyway, you seem to be ignoring what I have said. There were far fewer human beings five hundred years ago. By your reckoning that would mean far more cows...
@Pommit Yes, that's exactly what i mean, most animals have the capability to feel, a dog can be loyal and would never attack it's owner, heck even a lion can be loyal to the human who brought him up, it's called domestication. since they have this capability maybe they should stop eating other animals because it is unethical for them to do so right? Wrong. So why should it be different for humans?
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Because they are domesticated you think they understand ethics? Are you being serious? It is us who have morals and ethics, not animals. Domestication doesn't mean that animals have an understand of right and wrong. As we do, we can judge whether the continued satisfaction that an animal has in living out its life overweighs our needs to eat them for taste. I think it does. Whereas you talk about something to do with too many cows and pigs, which doesn't make sense.
@Pommit A dog knows not to bite it's owner does it not? it knows not to poop on the carpet does it not? it knows not to attack other humans does it not? A dog will put it's life on the line for it's owner will it not? So a dog(and in fact any animal that can be domesticated) may feel emotion, ethics and morality derive from emotion, so any animal that can be domesticated is therefore bound by morality to stop eating meat, and become a vegetarian, that would leave us with very few preds.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - You are being silly now. I am not talking about a basic form of moral decisionmaking that all higher functioning animals have, this sense of right and wrong is determined through learned behaviour with which almost all animals are limited to. The dog doesn't poop because he will be ill-favoured and is loyal because it recognises who feeds it. They do not have the capacity to conceptualise matters in such a way as us and they are far more bound by their own nature.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - The animals does not have the level of intelligence we have to develop a sense of morality that comes from decision based on competition between different values. They could not be brought to consider whether eating meat was moral. But to humour you, were they to, they could often not attain the sustenance needed. Given their ability to get food and their anatomy, they need meat. We don't need it and can make a choice. Is it better to let an animal enjoy its life or eat it?
@Pommit Dogs are domesticated wolves, wolves are hunters, all they eat is meat, now dogs can survive without meat, now they make VEGETARIAN dog foods, so if wolves can become vegetarians, who's to say other animals cannot? maybe ALL animals should become vegetarians just because they can right? WRONG, again predators are a necessity and just because something CAN be done, does not mean it SHOULD be done.
@TwistedxL3G3ND -I don't think your arguing technique is very good and you keep making straw men. Or maybe your thoughts are not clear. You refuse to take me up on the points I have made. You talk about overbreeding, rabbits, rights, and animals becoming vegetarians, but ignore the matter of humans. I never said that predatory animals are NOT a necessity. But I could ask you this, considering we don't need meat, just because we CAN kill for meat, SHOULD we?
@Pommit Well Lions can kill for meat, but should they? Wolves can kill for meat, but should they? Eagles can kill for meat, but should they? Since every animal has the possibility to survive without meat, who's to decide who can and CAN'T eat meat? You? Get over yourself. So they don't know they're doing wrong, but YOU know, why aren't you trying to stop THEM from eating meat?
@TwistedxL3G3ND - I don't think you are a clever 16 year old. I had said plenty of times that the circumstances for other animals and us are different. We CAN make a choice about whether to eat meat based on ethical and moral considerations. Animals can't Talking about telling other animals what they can and can't eat is stupid. And nothing about what I have said is about stopping people from eating meat. It is about convincing them that eating meat is wrong.
@Pommit Wrong, you are trying to convince me that humans need no meat and should therefore stop eating meat. Don't try to change your argument mid way. And morals and ethics differ from person to person, are you saying that your morals are the only absolute ones? That you are correct end everyone else is wrong? Like I said before, get over yourself.
@TwistedxL3G3ND Yes, lions should kill for meat. They're hypercarnivores, they've evolved to be hypercarnivores, and that means that physiologically they cannot properly receive nutrients from plants and plant based products because their bodies aren't "trained" to do it and therefore require human intervention. Those vegetarian dog foods you mentioned are usually supplemented heavily with synthetics. Furthermore, the first ingredient is CORN. Corn is indigestible to you AND your dog.
@jeveuxlesoleil No shit, Sherlock, it was a rhetorical question, and i don't know about you but i can digest corn just fine. Besides i don't feed my dog that vegetarian shit, i feed him regular dog food and sometimes a nice steak.
@TwistedxL3G3ND No. You cannot digest corn properly. The outer part of corn is full of fibre that we just don't have the enzymes to break down.
I am also aware that your question was rhetorical, but my answer wasn't actually directed at you, it was actually directed at Pommit, you were just the last post so I replied directly to you. Calm down.
Soluble and insoluble fibre is a necessary component of a healthy diet; at least if you're human. Getting at the innards of a kernel is what you have teeth and a neocortex for.
@TwistedxL3G3ND No. You cannot digest corn properly. The outer part of corn is full of fibre that we just don't have the enzymes to break down.
I am also aware that your question was rhetorical, but my answer wasn't actually directed at you, it was actually directed at Pommit, you were just the last post so I replied directly to you. Calm down.
@jeveuxlesoleil Once again, not shit, we can't always digest every part of everything we eat. So it isn't that we can't digest corn, but rather, we can't digest the outer part of corn.
And If the answer isn't directed at me, you should probably have replied to the person it was directed to, that way he can actually get the reply, either way rhetorical questions aren't meant to be answered.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - ...and pigs, etc. But that isn't the case. There were far less. It's the opposite case. As our population has grown, we have intervened to increase the number of animals. You keep referring to rabbits, but areas where rabbit population get out of control is when there are no or few predators, i.e. where they have been introduced - by man. It's man fault that there is a problem and that there is an imbalance. Anyway how many rabbits are eaten where you are from?
@Pommit And i can't believe this isn't obvious to you, you're contradicting yourself, no one hunts rabbits, therefore they are an overpopulation, you've said it yourself. So there IS a necessity for predators and there IS a necessity for humans to eat meat, Rabbit's are living proof, if humans ate rabbit more often, I'm sure there wouldn't be so many of them. Thanks for nullifying your own argument.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Where there are no predators, where man has introduced rabbits, their populations grow vastly. Although they are not a problem where I am from and there are no predators. Just lots of rabbits. But this is RABBITS, not cows, pigs, etc., so stick the issue at hand. And you don't sound very bright here. There is a necessity for many predators. But we aren't the necessary predator for cows and pigs and they won't overbreed, but you ignore this.
@Pommit Again this isn't about over breeding, it was just an example as to why eating meat is part of the food chain and nature itself, I'm sure there's plenty of animals that won't over breed, but that won't stop them from being hunted by a predator, now will it? Nature itself demands predators. You are arguing against nature itself, you can't win.
@TwistedxL3G3ND - But this is what I was saying at the start. Lots of animals eat meat. But we don't have to. Our eating of meat is not necessary to our survival unlike with other animals. We can make a choice. And it is nothing more than recognising that it is better to allow an animal to enjoy its life rather than end us for the satisfaction of our taste buds. There will be no overbreeding or animal populations problems.
@Pommit So you want animals to have rights, but you want them to have more rights than the person that is giving them the rights? they have the right to eat what they like, yet we are bound by morality to eat only fruits and vegetables? I've heard some foolish things in my time...
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Rights? I never mentioned 'rights'. Rights are permissions given to humans (or maybe even animals) by a government. No, I am saying that animals don't have a choice over what they eat in the wild and it is in their nature to eat meat. Our nature is whatever we make of it and the moral choice is to abstain from killing animals for their meat when we no longer need it for survival.
They should show how the get the sperm. My brother in law works for Farm Credit Services and goes out to farms from time to time. He told me he saw a Mexican that used a glass straw device that he would use to literally suck the cum out of the turkeys.
@masterraynard These are hens. It's not semen, it's poop. They were putting semen in the cloaca with the q-tip. Which is rather embarrassing if you think about it. Would you want to list "fucked 1500 turkeys in 2 hours" on your resume? That's probably why they were giggling like guilty teenagers.
Mike is too annoying, always trying to make funny jokes which are not, ignoring people who trie to show him everything around by looking to the camera and talking random stuff.
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
Poor turkies. I hope they weren't in pain. Did those things they clipped their legs together with hurt? how about the needle!?! This shouldn't be allowed.
I'm Mike Rowe, this is my job, *fuckin'* turkeys,.....
MrBoogyman1988 1 week ago
what the fuck LOLOLOL
UndeadRussianLord 1 week ago
VERY CRUEL
vidaminfeeder2 2 weeks ago
If Mike is inseminating these birds, then obviously they are female.
Yes people, what you have witnessed is female ejaculate but for birds.
azntranc3951 4 weeks ago 4
are they EJACULATING ha
1scoobysteve1 1 month ago
IS THAT TURKEY SPERM OR WHAT????
walnut680 1 month ago
This is my job, AI turkeys
enidaan88 1 month ago
awful
superfisto 2 months ago
Do the letters T and J mean anything to you?
mattlamb 2 months ago
@mattlamb why would they
babieejesse 1 month ago
@babieejesse It's a line from the movie Deuce Bigelow.
mattlamb 1 month ago
Most of these comments are debating u guys need to chill and just watch this dam video and some of u guys said almost the same thing in every comment but switched up the words...
b3stfuckendancers 2 months ago
"DAYYUUMM!.....SHAZAM!"
ShakeToTheJunt 2 months ago 3
WTF are they trying to do?
NevaehBeatez 2 months ago
bird porn
jradetzky 3 months ago
you wipe it off on her back? Yup. lol
zero67439 4 months ago
what exactly are they trying to do sticking that thing up their ass?
IncrediblyStupidName 4 months ago
@IncrediblyStupidName See. Here you are thinking humans have bad plumbing, with the amusement park right next to the sewage treatment plant; but birds have only a single orifice that handles everything.
Enjoy your eggs.
soylentgreenb 3 months ago
@soylentgreenb lol =D haha... but wasn't that a line from neil degrasse tyson?
IncrediblyStupidName 3 months ago
aww thats so nasty
Adawg4008 4 months ago
these twoo ther guys are like Beavis & Butthead
DarkDant3 4 months ago
"Can you wipe it off on her back?"
giggity.
TheRaellz 4 months ago
@TheRaellz Did u notice the first one had an orgasm lol giggity
MrBoogyman1988 1 week ago
yea, i was jerkin to this video
ShawnieBoii21 4 months ago
anyways a comment that really needs to be made notice of....
Did those turkeys... squirt milk.... or
elixa4 4 months ago
@elixa4 It's poo. Turkeys aren't mammals, so they don't produce milk :)
jeveuxlesoleil 4 months ago
awe!!!! i was eating too :(
Maddjack420 4 months ago
so much freakin long comments
mikey456s 4 months ago
what is that stuff?!!
betress1 4 months ago
Can anyone explain what they were doing? free sub...
ShadowLMFAO 4 months ago
@ShadowLMFAO Probably turkey enemas.
FasterThanAKenyan 4 months ago
@FasterThanAKenyan and that is?
ShadowLMFAO 4 months ago
@ShadowLMFAO Purging the anuses of turkeys. In simpler terms, I believe they are making the turkeys shit.
FasterThanAKenyan 4 months ago
@ShadowLMFAO they're inseminating them, as in taking the male turkeys out of the picture and making the female ones pregnant themselves.
itsyourmomOMFG 4 months ago
wow they are kept in such small cages
ginue02 4 months ago
Wat r they doing?
gk3og 4 months ago
@gk3og Artificial Insemination
em129836 4 months ago
0:52 squirt... :P
Theboredg4mer 4 months ago
reminds me of my horse farm in slovenia. We would stick our entire fists in the turkeys.The horses watching would get turned on and start raping me!
CarlChipSanders 4 months ago
thought he said "jizzam"
dearlysqearly 4 months ago
who knew he was so good with the ladies?
scrombat 4 months ago
Somebody please describe to me what I just watched. I think I might understand..but I just need to be sure o_o
KainE3453 4 months ago
0:57 bam!SHAZAM!
Toxeensynth 5 months ago
Oh fux, are they raping the poor birds!?
KamiKaZantA 5 months ago
what would peta say?
but hell who cares^^
SollingDown 5 months ago
Do people really "like" this??
Horrible how those animals are treated. Pure cruelty.
Sick fucks.
WHATABOUTUS18 6 months ago
@WHATABOUTUS18 shut u u god dam liberal
ephycooper 5 months ago
@ephycooper Fuck you piece of shit.
WHATABOUTUS18 4 months ago
@WHATABOUTUS18 if you dont like it why did you watch it sir
wowwee2000 4 months ago
@WHATABOUTUS18 I love animals as much as the next person but how is this cruel? Aren't they just inseminating the birds? If you don't like it, don't eat it, I'm just saying.
So long as people want to eat them, other people will have to rear them. Its part of their job, its natural.
kimchidream 4 months ago
@kimchidream - It's cruel from my way of seeing recognising that these turkeys are just being used as nothing more than a resource for man. And being stuck indoors. That isn't natural. It is probably that there is some suffering. I can think of plenty of comparisons which use your thinking where you wouldn't think it is natural. e.g. some people like to watch bullfighting, and other people carry it out, so you think bullfighting is natural? The word becomes meaningless.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit I'm sorry I must not have made myself clear. We need food. Turkeys are food. We need turkeys. We need lots of turkeys. To make lots of turkeys we need to have lots of pregnant turkeys. Turkeys aren't always in the mood to have fun in their free time. We have to make turkeys pregnant so we inseminate them. Fighting bulls aren't natural, pregnant turkeys are.
Again, if you can't deal with this, just do your part for turkeys by not eating them. I'm sure they'll appreciate it very much.
kimchidream 4 months ago
@kimchidream - Whereas I see it as this. We need food. We don't need meat and to use animals as a food source is to use them a resource. Any part of the food production using meat is immoral. It becomes cruel is where it involves suffering. It would not involve much suffering at all and it would be very brief, but dangling these animals upside down would be undesirable to them. But it is part of parcel of the disgusting intensive farming practice where there is much worse going on.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit I'd recommend you check out Onision's channel if you haven't already because he's big on the whole Eating-Meat-Is-Gross-So-Go-Vegetarian shit too. I'm not a vegetarian nor am I a vegan- All my life I've lived on a mainly carnivorous diet with some greens and fruits thrown in there because I love eating dead animal flesh so on this we must agree to disagree.
Have a nice day.
kimchidream 4 months ago
@kimchidream - At least you're eating your greens and staying healthy. Well done. Hehe. I would seriously recommend Peter Singer's books. But yes, I understand yours and others points of view, I ate meat until recently and loved the taste. Steaks taste great. I agree with you on that. But it doesn't make it right to eat them. I can no longer justify having cows, pigs, and chickens killed just because they are tasty.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Food chain. Animals eat other animals in order to survive, try convincing a lion to go vegetarian. The world needs balance, and by having animals eat other animals that are breeding too fast we are achieving that balance, if no one ate meat then these animals would go die and rot somewhere and create mass disease.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - We have the ability to determine where we place ourselves in the food chain, precisely because we can be convinced unless the lion. The lion does not understand morality. But we don't need meat to survive. As to your second point, I do think you are being naive. The land would not be overrun by animals were they not to be eaten. Meat consumption was much less one hundred years ago than today, cows and pigs didn't overun the place. There are more farm animals now than ever.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit And so you want to place yourself at the bottom of the food chain? And of course food consumption was less back then, you'd think so when there is 5 times as many of us now as there was back then, now we BREED more animals because there's a lot more of us which equals higher demand, why would they breed the same amounts of animals back then when there's only about 1/5 of the population we have now? When did I say we'd be overrun by animals? I said since their meat wasn't being
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND Used for consumption it would just sit there, rot, and cause disease.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Why would it matter where in the food chain we are? It isn't a contest. I don't think any of the other animals care what we do. No, I said that meat consumption was far less. It is only in the last fifty years that the proportion of meat consumer compared with non-meat foodstuffs has rocketed. You said they would be breeding too fast. But these animals won't be breeding too fast. Without intensive farming for starters, there would be far fewer animals.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit - You are right in saying that as population has increased there is a greater demand for meat though. But it is beside the point. It seems you are contradicting yourself when you talk of 'breeding too fast' as the logical conclusion of your view is that the HUMAN population has to increase to cope with the increased breeding of animals. But as you know, it is us who are overbreeding and want more animals.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Animals breed without the help of humans you know. Why do you think there is such things as rabbit seasons and duck seasons? To keep their population under control, imagine if no one was hunting these? we'd be overrun by them in no time. Logic isn't the only thing, it's also knowledge and common sense, And of course this is a competition, it's called survival of the fittest, how many herbivores do you see at the top of the food chain?
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND And if you really wanted to I'm sure you could put yourself somewhere else in the food chain, try running into a pack of lionesses looking to feed their young.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Rabbit populations DO get out of control, precisely because they have been introduced into areas many years ago where there has been little predation and they do breed very quickly. Not the case with ducks. And not the case with the animals we eat. By your reckoning, as I keep saying, there would be far more animals around hundreds of years ago because there less people. But this is all irrelevant for a couple of reasons. One is that we don't eat animals because...
Pommit 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - You don't see any herbivores at the top of the food chain. What is your point? It sounds like you feel some strange pride from being at the top. Would you feel your pride would be hurt if you relegated yourself down this chain?
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit ...because there will be too many of them if we don't. They are eaten because they taste good. It was never as if humans took a look around and realised the land was being swamped by too many pigs and cows and decided the best way to deal with the problem was to eat them.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Are you implying that people are the only things that eat meat? well they aren't, i said if no one ate meat, that includes animals. You don't think the animal population would grow if no animal was ever eaten? Well then you are ignorant, and my point still stands as even thought we have hunting seasons, populations still get out of control, if we were all vegans then the rabbit population would keep on growing and cause a natural in balance. you are defying the balance of nature itself..
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND For some moral high ground, and that is completely idiotic.
And no, back then we ate meat to survive, You think cavemen got some chicken and species and made some Chicken Parmesan? you think raw lizard meat tasted delicious? Again, common sense. Survival of the fittest. Food chain. If you don't like being on top, there is always the lioness option.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Actually, I don't really know what you are talking about when you go on about cavemen and parmedan and raw lizard meat. You sound a bit incoherent and your comment about the lioness doesn't make sense at all. You seem to be fixated on the subject of food chain, as if it some grand achievement and something to be proud about. Pride has nothing to do with it. Morality has. If we only kill because something tastes nice then that's not a good enough reason.
Pommit 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Not implying that at all. Are you under the impression that cows, pigs, and lambs are our prey in the same way a lion hunts a gazelle, i.e. that we are born to eat these animals in the same way that tigers and lions eat animals? The facts don't bear that out when you look at the evolution of man and our dietary needs. Anyway, you seem to be ignoring what I have said. There were far fewer human beings five hundred years ago. By your reckoning that would mean far more cows...
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Yes, that's exactly what i mean, most animals have the capability to feel, a dog can be loyal and would never attack it's owner, heck even a lion can be loyal to the human who brought him up, it's called domestication. since they have this capability maybe they should stop eating other animals because it is unethical for them to do so right? Wrong. So why should it be different for humans?
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Because they are domesticated you think they understand ethics? Are you being serious? It is us who have morals and ethics, not animals. Domestication doesn't mean that animals have an understand of right and wrong. As we do, we can judge whether the continued satisfaction that an animal has in living out its life overweighs our needs to eat them for taste. I think it does. Whereas you talk about something to do with too many cows and pigs, which doesn't make sense.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit A dog knows not to bite it's owner does it not? it knows not to poop on the carpet does it not? it knows not to attack other humans does it not? A dog will put it's life on the line for it's owner will it not? So a dog(and in fact any animal that can be domesticated) may feel emotion, ethics and morality derive from emotion, so any animal that can be domesticated is therefore bound by morality to stop eating meat, and become a vegetarian, that would leave us with very few preds.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - You are being silly now. I am not talking about a basic form of moral decisionmaking that all higher functioning animals have, this sense of right and wrong is determined through learned behaviour with which almost all animals are limited to. The dog doesn't poop because he will be ill-favoured and is loyal because it recognises who feeds it. They do not have the capacity to conceptualise matters in such a way as us and they are far more bound by their own nature.
Pommit 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - The animals does not have the level of intelligence we have to develop a sense of morality that comes from decision based on competition between different values. They could not be brought to consider whether eating meat was moral. But to humour you, were they to, they could often not attain the sustenance needed. Given their ability to get food and their anatomy, they need meat. We don't need it and can make a choice. Is it better to let an animal enjoy its life or eat it?
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Dogs are domesticated wolves, wolves are hunters, all they eat is meat, now dogs can survive without meat, now they make VEGETARIAN dog foods, so if wolves can become vegetarians, who's to say other animals cannot? maybe ALL animals should become vegetarians just because they can right? WRONG, again predators are a necessity and just because something CAN be done, does not mean it SHOULD be done.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND -I don't think your arguing technique is very good and you keep making straw men. Or maybe your thoughts are not clear. You refuse to take me up on the points I have made. You talk about overbreeding, rabbits, rights, and animals becoming vegetarians, but ignore the matter of humans. I never said that predatory animals are NOT a necessity. But I could ask you this, considering we don't need meat, just because we CAN kill for meat, SHOULD we?
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Well Lions can kill for meat, but should they? Wolves can kill for meat, but should they? Eagles can kill for meat, but should they? Since every animal has the possibility to survive without meat, who's to decide who can and CAN'T eat meat? You? Get over yourself. So they don't know they're doing wrong, but YOU know, why aren't you trying to stop THEM from eating meat?
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - I don't think you are a clever 16 year old. I had said plenty of times that the circumstances for other animals and us are different. We CAN make a choice about whether to eat meat based on ethical and moral considerations. Animals can't Talking about telling other animals what they can and can't eat is stupid. And nothing about what I have said is about stopping people from eating meat. It is about convincing them that eating meat is wrong.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Wrong, you are trying to convince me that humans need no meat and should therefore stop eating meat. Don't try to change your argument mid way. And morals and ethics differ from person to person, are you saying that your morals are the only absolute ones? That you are correct end everyone else is wrong? Like I said before, get over yourself.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND Yes, lions should kill for meat. They're hypercarnivores, they've evolved to be hypercarnivores, and that means that physiologically they cannot properly receive nutrients from plants and plant based products because their bodies aren't "trained" to do it and therefore require human intervention. Those vegetarian dog foods you mentioned are usually supplemented heavily with synthetics. Furthermore, the first ingredient is CORN. Corn is indigestible to you AND your dog.
jeveuxlesoleil 4 months ago
@jeveuxlesoleil No shit, Sherlock, it was a rhetorical question, and i don't know about you but i can digest corn just fine. Besides i don't feed my dog that vegetarian shit, i feed him regular dog food and sometimes a nice steak.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND No. You cannot digest corn properly. The outer part of corn is full of fibre that we just don't have the enzymes to break down.
I am also aware that your question was rhetorical, but my answer wasn't actually directed at you, it was actually directed at Pommit, you were just the last post so I replied directly to you. Calm down.
jeveuxlesoleil 4 months ago
@jeveuxlesoleil Define "digest properly".
Soluble and insoluble fibre is a necessary component of a healthy diet; at least if you're human. Getting at the innards of a kernel is what you have teeth and a neocortex for.
soylentgreenb 3 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND No. You cannot digest corn properly. The outer part of corn is full of fibre that we just don't have the enzymes to break down.
I am also aware that your question was rhetorical, but my answer wasn't actually directed at you, it was actually directed at Pommit, you were just the last post so I replied directly to you. Calm down.
jeveuxlesoleil 4 months ago
@jeveuxlesoleil Once again, not shit, we can't always digest every part of everything we eat. So it isn't that we can't digest corn, but rather, we can't digest the outer part of corn.
And If the answer isn't directed at me, you should probably have replied to the person it was directed to, that way he can actually get the reply, either way rhetorical questions aren't meant to be answered.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@Pommit Oh and sorry for the late reply, i was enjoying 2 hot dogs with extra bacon and a veal burger.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND i just ate two hot dogs :D it wouldve been three but some pig came and took my 3 hot dog so i killed him and made some bacon
xx2RAHxx 4 months ago
@xx2RAHxx Well you, sir, are awesome :D
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND muchas gracias senior, i try ^_^
xx2RAHxx 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - ...and pigs, etc. But that isn't the case. There were far less. It's the opposite case. As our population has grown, we have intervened to increase the number of animals. You keep referring to rabbits, but areas where rabbit population get out of control is when there are no or few predators, i.e. where they have been introduced - by man. It's man fault that there is a problem and that there is an imbalance. Anyway how many rabbits are eaten where you are from?
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit And i can't believe this isn't obvious to you, you're contradicting yourself, no one hunts rabbits, therefore they are an overpopulation, you've said it yourself. So there IS a necessity for predators and there IS a necessity for humans to eat meat, Rabbit's are living proof, if humans ate rabbit more often, I'm sure there wouldn't be so many of them. Thanks for nullifying your own argument.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Where there are no predators, where man has introduced rabbits, their populations grow vastly. Although they are not a problem where I am from and there are no predators. Just lots of rabbits. But this is RABBITS, not cows, pigs, etc., so stick the issue at hand. And you don't sound very bright here. There is a necessity for many predators. But we aren't the necessary predator for cows and pigs and they won't overbreed, but you ignore this.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit Again this isn't about over breeding, it was just an example as to why eating meat is part of the food chain and nature itself, I'm sure there's plenty of animals that won't over breed, but that won't stop them from being hunted by a predator, now will it? Nature itself demands predators. You are arguing against nature itself, you can't win.
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - But this is what I was saying at the start. Lots of animals eat meat. But we don't have to. Our eating of meat is not necessary to our survival unlike with other animals. We can make a choice. And it is nothing more than recognising that it is better to allow an animal to enjoy its life rather than end us for the satisfaction of our taste buds. There will be no overbreeding or animal populations problems.
Pommit 4 months ago
@Pommit So you want animals to have rights, but you want them to have more rights than the person that is giving them the rights? they have the right to eat what they like, yet we are bound by morality to eat only fruits and vegetables? I've heard some foolish things in my time...
TwistedxL3G3ND 4 months ago
@TwistedxL3G3ND - Rights? I never mentioned 'rights'. Rights are permissions given to humans (or maybe even animals) by a government. No, I am saying that animals don't have a choice over what they eat in the wild and it is in their nature to eat meat. Our nature is whatever we make of it and the moral choice is to abstain from killing animals for their meat when we no longer need it for survival.
Pommit 4 months ago
I like cheese
JauhoPeltola 6 months ago
24 violated turkeys rated this vid
calledartist 7 months ago
Why are they inseminating the turkeys??
opentreetrunk 7 months ago
ive never seen that part of a turkey :s
xChrisSpinzx 7 months ago
I hate turkey. One minute more and I would see my lunch meal again splashed on the screen.
Ps05205 8 months ago
bahahhaah
runafes 8 months ago
This really wasn't that hard to masturbate to. Seriously.
vicpro1 8 months ago
I know I love turkey and stuff but... man, this makes me sad...
heyitshannahbanana 8 months ago 6
LOL WHY WERE THEY BUT RAPING THE TURKEYS
IchliebeTokioHotel17 9 months ago
disgusting
NadimahElizabeth 9 months ago
HOLY SHIT MAN THAT IS NASTY!
xXAsuraAssassinXx 10 months ago
reminds me of jackass 3
WEEGEEFAN1997 10 months ago
they should really wear gloves........
belladonna262 10 months ago
man eating shit haha very funny!
watch?v=9prY7yXjqe8
zezinm 10 months ago
@zezinm "eat dah poopoo"
darkfire1044 9 months ago 18
cum shots ahaha
demonchil2009 10 months ago
hahaha,so gross
ThePinkpunk55 10 months ago
next time im gonna nut on my girlfriends face im gonna say shazam
clintongraham 11 months ago 2
I worked doing this for 2 years as a youth growing up on a Kibbutz in Israel, as for the males, they get "milked"
tracyla1970 11 months ago 17
@tracyla1970 u be a jew??
xx2RAHxx 4 months ago
They should show how the get the sperm. My brother in law works for Farm Credit Services and goes out to farms from time to time. He told me he saw a Mexican that used a glass straw device that he would use to literally suck the cum out of the turkeys.
xanos4225 11 months ago
I'm horrified and fascinated at the same time. It's absolutely disgusting but I. Can't. TURN. AWAY!
twitcher64 11 months ago 3
CUMSHOT!!!! 0:54
akatsuki1234567 1 year ago
0:47 my fav
killerofporn 1 year ago
And just when i was eating lunch.....
broadude 1 year ago
idiots i sure wont be calling you
SuperMandyDog 1 year ago
Now, i dont want to be that person and rant and rave on how this is "ABUSE" but I'm pretty sure they don't hurt the turkeys... that bad...
right?!
Luxa3000 1 year ago
why is there semen in thier butt
masterraynard 1 year ago
@masterraynard These are hens. It's not semen, it's poop. They were putting semen in the cloaca with the q-tip. Which is rather embarrassing if you think about it. Would you want to list "fucked 1500 turkeys in 2 hours" on your resume? That's probably why they were giggling like guilty teenagers.
martisbvk 1 year ago 2
@masterraynard because they are homosexual turkey
machetero1 11 months ago
i watch this episode there sucking out semen out of a turkeys rectum
Troll Translation Rectum=Asshole Semen=Cum
FinalCAlegit 1 year ago
wdf were they doing to the turkey
Edwinoreo 1 year ago
@Edwinoreo Artificial Insemination. ie Getting the bird pregnant.
martisbvk 1 year ago
a minute ad for a 1:06 movie. That's messed up.
12bluedragon 1 year ago
what are they doing....?
InjectMorphineIntoMe 1 year ago
and you wipe it off on her back lol
the420weedman1 1 year ago
what are they doing and why?
dvdsmlprstylr 1 year ago
@dvdsmlprstylr If you read the info, it states that he is inseminating the birds LMFAO
Chris41279x 1 year ago
If you want to stop ads download mozzila and then addone for ads and wolla
Legenda91 1 year ago
turkey rape.. nice... gag
sherilaugh 1 year ago
Mike is too annoying, always trying to make funny jokes which are not, ignoring people who trie to show him everything around by looking to the camera and talking random stuff.
MightyJustas 1 year ago
Mike you are frigging hot!
smoklhoe 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why are they spraying all over everything?!
runescapemichbla 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free inexhaustible energy is real!But the big oil corporations don't want that technology revealed,Get the blueprints for a free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the energy revolution!
checksummedchest 1 year ago
inhumane motherfuckers
TheMealworm 1 year ago 3
Is it just me, or was anybody else REALLY turned on by this scene? I think one of those turkeys has the makings to be a great pornstar.
VoodooPolitico 1 year ago 55
@VoodooPolitico ugh thats nasty XD
foxloverfreak 10 months ago
@VoodooPolitico Dude.......
redodrago 4 months ago
@VoodooPolitico Freak.
VelaToNorma7 4 months ago
what in the world was he doing?
c00lb0y10 1 year ago
@c00lb0y10 they're basically mass producing turkeys by artificially impregnating them
BeaglesRuleTheRoost 1 year ago
I remember when he came here! it was in all the papers, my friend lives next door to these people!
VintageRedheadGirl 1 year ago
so are they artificially insiminating the turkeys? And are the turkeys pooping or squirting?
bigfabe12 1 year ago
Poor turkies. I hope they weren't in pain. Did those things they clipped their legs together with hurt? how about the needle!?! This shouldn't be allowed.
spongebobslushpants1 1 year ago
@spongebobslushpants1 Oh no, is only a grip, it dont hurt because it has rubber so they wont feel the pressure.
pekalion 1 year ago
0:54 ...
EEIII, SHAZAAM!!!! :)
That's epic!
creeperd7 1 year ago
holy crap why not let them roam around like real turkeys and let nature take it course?
Restfulduchess 1 year ago
@Restfulduchess Nature takes too long and people are trying to make a profit.
Afterall the freedom and rights of something you eat means nothing compared to the wallets of the shareholders.
Damn, thats depressing.
Gothchick208 1 year ago
0:55 All-natural turkey gravy.
rkmugen 1 year ago
@rkmugen hmmm... more like 0:54
rkmugen 1 year ago
Comment removed
faten87 1 year ago
And it's such a wonder why he's single.
AFLoneWolf 1 year ago
@AFLoneWolf Fuck you Mike is fucking AWESOME! a TRUE Man :D
SatansMullet 1 year ago
The best use of the word "shazam" I've ever seen.
OperationCrossroad 1 year ago 165
LOL, "and you wipe on her back?" Yep".
ForeverSn1per 1 year ago 3
wat are they doing?????
jokerhong123 1 year ago
@jokerhong123 thier breeding turkeys stupid
WoWgirlscool24 1 year ago
@jokerhong123 This breed of turkey cannot breed naturally so they have to artificially insemenate the tukey hens cause of thier large size.
odcoolshark75 1 year ago 3
those turkey farmers seem to be loving Mikes reactions
reptilehunter7 1 year ago
What are they doing??
MikeyCreation 1 year ago
is it becasue theyre with the turkeys too long that they jsut keep giggling?
ImAnotherZang 1 year ago
wad r they doing? some 1 answer pls
TheBlessedOne29 1 year ago
@TheBlessedOne29 the are breeding turkeys
WoWgirlscool24 1 year ago
it stinks
shibimolxxx 1 year ago
there is NO WAY someone could get me working in this job XD
Question150 1 year ago
how the fuck do people get into jobs like those? lmao, Like who clicked the "turkey poop inspectors wanted!!!" ad? Seriously?
BR0WNEYESx3 1 year ago
ewwwwwwwwww
alex054739 1 year ago
what was that shit
MrNicholasJacob 1 year ago
@MrNicholasJacob ur mom!!!!
reptilehunter7 1 year ago
@MrNicholasJacob
That was turkey shit
milkman52879 1 year ago