Added: 2 years ago
From: MinDBlanK1
Views: 10,362
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Im watching this stoned and it makes sense

  • bravo to Dr. Michio Kaku, he is a smart man.

  • Dr. Michio Kaku should have been my teacher. He can say anything and I listen, pay attention and even get inspired.

  • wow. i am very impressed internet. no religious controversy or arguments about god yayyyy

  • @anandien70 and no racial epithets ... yayyyy to that. We intellectuals are concerned with more important things to be bogged down by such foolish banality. I need to visit more vids like this one. I'm in good company. And the topic is AMAZING!!!

  • The scientific concept of superstrings is consistent with the spiritual concept of the Audible Life Stream.

  • well if we can recall the bible who was god's musician? was it not the infamous devil. he lived only to make music for god's ears.

  • maybe we should look at relativity and quantum mechanics at the same way we look at dreaming and being awake, both realities are real but most of the time not compatible, relativity relates to the waking world of material things and the senses and quantum physics to the dreaming world of thoughts and the mind.

    not literally but only as a parable

  • String theory makes more sense to me after i did dmt. I felt and saw the strings in my mind and the room around me. Not just once but 4 times. They feel good.

  • I thiught there were 11 dimensions.

  • @cassidy99ful String theory used to say there were 9 spatial dimensions and one of time. Now M theory says there are 10 spatial and one of time. But in the equations, they never even factor time down, they used N=9 and N=10

    If time is not a spatial dimension, then what is it? It's not a flow of time particles. Is time the 11th dimension? Is it the fourth dimension? I think time is one of two directions in the fourth spatial dimension. There is no need for an 11th.

  • Oh Yeah, I love Music

  • The mind of God is music...

  • "The fine-structure constant and the nature of the universe, Ye cannae change the laws of physics, Or can you?" :In a paper just submitted to Physical Review Letters, a team led by John Webb and Julian King from the University of New South Wales in Australia present evidence that the fine-structure constant may not actually be constant after all. Rather, it seems to vary from place to place within the universe. (review also R-C.Hoagland's thesis on Torsion field physics & Tetrahedral sciences)

  • Some would argue time is not a dimension as you cannot move through it as the others.

  • Not right now we can't. That's also why it's always listed seperately though.

  • @MinDBlanK1 Space and time aren't separated; they're part of what constitutes the third dimension.

  • @MinDBlanK1 Time is the fourth spatial dimension. Our brains produces a 2D holographic simulation of 3D cross-sectional 'nows', which are stacked side by side in the fourth dimension, and consciousness jumps from one frame to the next thousands of times per second. The fourth spatial dimension has two directions, time and anti-time. Matter moves through time. Anti-matter moves through anti-time. But more fundamentally, the 4D time-line is but another cross-section of a 5 dimensional hyper-now..

  • @Kasu1917 where're your sources that antimatter moves through anti time? I covered huge amount of material regarding antimatter in school &research during past 5 years dealing with modern physics including much of Diracs work. Diracs equations do not require 5D, actually quite the opposite, positrons etc exist in time along with normal matter. in think much of what you state based on popular fiction rubbish (star trek and TV), if not... then I WANT SOURCES!

  • @slovakmath well thanks for the personal attacks but I'm pretty sure it was Michio Kaku who said that anti-matter was moving through anti-time, which was why in our entropy-driven perspective of moving through time, we find that the universe is mysteriously made out of matter, and not anti-matter. I never said anything about positrons.. Just because anti-matter is moving backwards in time does not mean that it can't be observed or experienced...

  • @slovakmath At this time, the apparent asymmetry of matter and antimatter in the visible universe is one of the greatest unsolved problems in physics. You're assuming that anti-matter is simply matter with an opposite charge, but it isn't that simple.  You need to abandon your naive-realist assumptions that your science text books were correct, because it will only hold you back with the upcoming paradigm shift that will reveal that all matter is just strings vibrating in 10 spatial dimensions

  • @slovakmath Whether Dirac's equations require 5 dimensions or not is besides the point. Kaluza proved, and Einstein agreed, that the equations for gravity and electromagnetism were united in the fifth dimension. He proved that ripples in the fifth dimension created photons. Also, general relativity shows that objects with mass bend and warp the fabric of spacetime. Space time is 4 dimensional. What space is 4 dimensional spacetime bending and warping into? the fifth dimension. Its common sense.

  • @slovakmath "Positrons exist in time along with normal matter." Very good! They must necessarily exist in space-time or else we wouldn't be able to use them.. But more fundamentally, those particles are just the tip of the iceberg floating in an ocean of 10 dimensional hyperspace. Quantum physics and general relativity are utterly incompatible unless there are 10 spatial dimensions in which strings to vibrate in. Dark matter, for example, is matter which is vibrating in a higher dimension.

  • @Kasu1917 I thought there were 11 dimensions?10 spacial and 1 time.

  • @Kasu1917 if what you say is correct, which I highly doubt it is, how do you explain us creating observing &using antimatter in hospital (PET scans)& physics lab if positron exists outside 4d spacetime which we experience? I think your language is cute, you sound like my nephew's SciFi stories he writes for elementary school, but it is still total rubbish.you should state ahead of time that you just MADE IT UP b/c some lay-people might believe you &that is wrong to do to the uneducated(like you)

  • @MinDBlanK1 we are all moving through time.

  • @saigonpunkid Einstein wrote a letter to Besso's family, saying that although Besso had preceded him in death it was of no consequence, "...for us physicists believe the separation between past, present, and future is only an illusion, although a convincing one."

  • @saigonpunkid But you can only move foward, never back. :D

  • @HORRORTV1 If you move fast enough, time slows down, and the theory is that if you move faster than the speed of light, then you shakll actually be moving back in time.

  • @ALEXANDERPLAYER it's called time dilation

    when you travel at the speed of light in a straight line, time slow downs, it will be as you traveled into the future

    the only way you could travel back in time was through a black whole/wormhole

    the downside is, you can only travel back to the point when it was created

  • @HORRORTV1

    this all a theory there is no fact fair student.... we don't know exactly where the black hole takes the object passing through it exept destruction on the matter which forms the object

  • @finalfrontier001 A black hole and a worm hole are two different objects. A black whole is simply an object in the universe with a gravitational force stronger to trap even C (light).

    A worm hole is only hypothetical for now, we have no experimental data besides equations. You can also time travel with a worm hole through creating two holes and accelerate one of them to C or close to C for a while (time dilation) and bring it back.

  • @HORRORTV1

    i know what a worm hole is and i know it's theoretical theory deriving from the the Theory of relativity that you can use gravity to bend space and time which can create a warp hole to the other side of the galaxy or universe to bend space and time you would need a huge about of force which is not practical but can occcur through a phenomenon :)

  • @finalfrontier001 I believe that "force" is Planck energy. Also, a wormhole might not necessarily lead you to another universe as we don't even know if parallel universe exists. Schrodinger's wave functions could lead to a good probability that it does exist. :)

  • @MinDBlanK1 time is only 1 dimension.. it only goes forward

  • 10 spacial dimentionals + time = 11dimentions

  • Dr Michio Kaku is amazing.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more