must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murdered in 1945. her body was not fund until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos 30 minutes the dead girl will appear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
No, we always need cache-memory on the cpu, beacuse the latency on main-memory is a lot slower than latency on cache-memory, so L1 and L2-cache will always be much faster than main-memory. And besides, main-memory uses DRAM or 1-bit per transistor wich is slow when cache-memory uses SRAM with 4 transistors per bit and that kind of RAM is both fast and expensive and can therefore not be used on main-memory, wich should then be very very expensive.
@ncrkel my laptop has 1TB of L2-cache, just one aspect of the many amazing specs of my mind boggling laptop, also it has mind sync which connects via a form of wifi directly to the users mind for faster user interface.
@3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX RAM speed is limited by frontside bus speed, in other words, how fast can data flow from RAM to the processor. The access time of data in RAM is inconsequential if you're limited by a 800 MHz bus.
That's why cache exists, it allows you to load chunks of commonly used data onto the processor, so that it can be accessed without using frontside bus, thus only limited (mostly) by the speed of the processor itself.
This has been flagged as spam show
must read this. once u have started there is no turning back. a little 10 year old girl was raped and murdered in 1945. her body was not fund until 1947. then a boy last week read this and did not copy and paste this message. the dead girl appeared in his room haunting him and killed him. if you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos 30 minutes the dead girl will appear in your room tonight and haunt you and kill you. well you better start to copy and paste to be saved
Bradphil87 4 months ago
512kb l2 lol
10cmsub 7 months ago
No, we always need cache-memory on the cpu, beacuse the latency on main-memory is a lot slower than latency on cache-memory, so L1 and L2-cache will always be much faster than main-memory. And besides, main-memory uses DRAM or 1-bit per transistor wich is slow when cache-memory uses SRAM with 4 transistors per bit and that kind of RAM is both fast and expensive and can therefore not be used on main-memory, wich should then be very very expensive.
ncrkel 9 months ago
@ncrkel my laptop has 1TB of L2-cache, just one aspect of the many amazing specs of my mind boggling laptop, also it has mind sync which connects via a form of wifi directly to the users mind for faster user interface.
matthias2986 9 months ago 2
@ncrkel How does a transistor work? In a CPU I mean.
AlwaysLearningTech 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
l2Chigivaral2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you dont know now you know! thanks
shaneinpoco 1 year ago
24mb L2 WOOP!
jdcrispe95 1 year ago
When RAM will run at 4Ghz does it mean that we do not need cashe anymore?
3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX 1 year ago
@3D8n52DmV37EI6oHeX RAM speed is limited by frontside bus speed, in other words, how fast can data flow from RAM to the processor. The access time of data in RAM is inconsequential if you're limited by a 800 MHz bus.
That's why cache exists, it allows you to load chunks of commonly used data onto the processor, so that it can be accessed without using frontside bus, thus only limited (mostly) by the speed of the processor itself.
cilution 1 year ago
6MB l2 cache woot!
Protoking 2 years ago
thanks
Awaisiq 2 years ago
so is there a big difference between 2mb L2 cache and 3mb L2 cache?
stephenlandrum 2 years ago
@stephenlandrum there is a difference - but many users may not find it to be notable one...
matthias2986 9 months ago
Yes this is cool, thank you.
knaper5 2 years ago
awesome, nice vid :D
nico12113 2 years ago