Landscape Photography Tips - What's In My Bag

[steinway1923]

I found this video really useful.

Thank you

[bigbikes750]

Hi Jamie. First of all let me thank you for your great and very very helpful vids. Believe me with all your help my photography is improving, so thank you again.

I did notice in this video that you had a big stopper filter, can I ask were you got it from as I cant buy one anywhere at all. No one has them :~(

Thanks again Jami, keep up the great work.

Cheers

Peter

[charleswestwoodphoto]

HI JAMIE... im fine thank you how are you? Its nice to see some simple pleasantries on youtube.

[DavidHeatonPhoto]

do you get any vignetting with the filters at 16mm?

[jpatersonphotography]

@DavidHeatonPhoto Most definitely do. So I tend it use it at around 18mm to 20mm. Also I don't use filters that much anymore so when I don't I may go to 16mm.

[gunputt]

Hi Jamie,

I see that you didn't bring out a polarising filter, i found that quite interesting. Do you have one but just forgot to bring it out, or do you not find it necessary? Also was expecting a super wide angle lens, seems to be quite popular with landscape/seascape photographers.

Great videos! Love your work!

[jpatersonphotography]

@gunputt I really not using any filters at all anymore. I do use polarising filters but I seem to break them on an extremely regular basis for some reason so I may not have had any in my bag at the time. The 16-35mm lens is more than wide enough for me and as I tend to stitch my photos these days I don't need to use the wide angle as often. How that helps. :-)

[leepaothao]

do you think going all prime is much better or is your lens set up better?

I want to buy more gears this summer, don't really know which way to go...

[jpatersonphotography]

@leepaothao Its my personal opinion that primes are nearly always the way to go and they produce a much better result. I'd love to have all primes but I really don't want to have to carry a bag full of primes it would just be too heavy on long walks.

The only other prime I would probably buy at this stage would be the 17mm TSE and if I did that I'd remove the 16-35mm.

[murphfishing]

Very good and thanks for the info on the filters

keep up the good work, very helpful

Thanks

[V2SkiLLz0R]

Thanks for update! Nice to hear from you again :)

[jpatersonphotography]

@V2SkiLLz0R Thanks. Now that comment has made my day!

[deathdemon128]

i'm only envious of the 70 -200 coz i;ve heard and tried it for a great protriat lens

[jpatersonphotography]

@deathdemon128 I don't do portraits anymore but its the original reason as to why I bought the 70-200mm. It was excellent for portraits.

[ibrahimalghamdi94]

you're lucky to have that kind of equipment! i have Canon 550d, Canon 50mm f1.8, and Canon 18-55mm f3.5-5.6. that's all i have :(

[jpatersonphotography]

@ibrahimalghamdi94 I bet you could still get some pretty awesome photos with that gear. :-)

[deathdemon128]

@ibrahimalghamdi94 regardless of your equipment. I believe u can still produce great photos. the only difference is more expensive equipment makes the photographers day a lot easier. Recently the improvements in gear brought about the change that the photographer is the weakest link in the chain.

[jarhead262]

fantastic equipment I would trade with you any time. lol

[jpatersonphotography]

@jarhead262 Hey Jarhead. Yeah I am pretty lucky. I love my gear so much and take it with me everywhere.

Jamie

[Lumixster]

Whats in my bad? :D Hope nothing noty and only cams , kids close ur eyes lol