OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Buy my book and DVD. 10 years later. OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Look at this evidence. Buy my book and DVD. 30 years later. OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Look at this evidence. Buy my book and DVD. 50 years later. We have new evidence. See what guy over there. He's suspicious looking, by the way. Buy my book and DVD.
Wow. some people just don't see a building being ripped apart by explosives even when it's right in front of them. It looks different when they're demolished from the top down, but you can still see the buildings exploding as they go downward...otherwise, why is the concrete turning to dust before it even hits the ground? Can that be explained? It is OBVIOUS to me at 1:47+. SOOOOOO UNBELIEVABLY OBVIOUS you'd have to be blind to not see it.
wenn die usa als einziges land der welt es schaffen mit alu-flugzeugen durch stahlhochhäuser zu fliegen, warum schießen sie dann nicht mit alu-munition auf panzer????????????????
A. The US has never shot down a passenger plane that has been hijacked..most of the time the hijacked plane is ordered to fly to a different location and land.
B. You all seen the planes hit the buildings..they were full of jet fuel..the impact and then the melting of the steel frame by the intense heat made the buildings fall
C.We own the Arab and Muslium world NOTHING. Stop blowing crap up and leave other countries and religons alone and we WOULD NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS!!!
Why do people keep saying that the towers collapsed like a controlled demolition? It was NOTHING like a controlled demolition. Look at the video. The building breaks at the point the plane hit and it pancakes down from the top.
I looked at video of high rise buildings that collapsed due to earthquake here on YouTube. Considering that the energy output of an earthquake would be significantly stronger than a plane slamming into a building I found it interesting that they just fell over and when they came apart the dust and height of the debris didn't exceed the first few floors of the surrounding buildings. WTC reminds me of fireworks going off.
There's still truthers out there? HaHaHaHaHa! Truthers have as much credibility as those nut jobs who thought the world was going to end May 21!!! It takes a weak and gullible mind to actually believe this conspiracy shit!!
@jeffkrofd gullible minds are immune to facts and they also believe the media unquestionably! It was "conspiracy nut jobs" who first were laughed at by the masses for saying the world was round also. Conspiracy nut jobs also seem to know who the next Prime Minister . Presidents will be 3 - 5 years in advance of an election. A lot of conspiracies are found to be true eventually history has proven that. And who are you to laugh at some one else's opinion especially when it accounts for details!
@jeffkrofd Grow some fucking balls you dumb fucking sheep and actually do some research! Dismissal before investigation is the worst form of arrogance! And arrogant you are!
@jeffkrofd Oh and 9/11 truthers stand for truth in general, thats why they like Ron Paul dumb ass! He is the only guy actually talking truth, wanting the fed reserve transparent etc... You really need to wake up!
@galaxything Ron Paul has denied there was any conspiracy behind 911 time and time again! Dumb ass! I get my information in the real world from scientific evidence by reputable scientists and journalist! You probably get your info on the internet from conspiracy freaks! And it was people that believed in rational thinking that figured out the earth was round through science and mathematics not conspiracies! I just find it so humorous at how stupid people can be! HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
People keep forgetting the WTC towers had no internal columns. They were not normal buildings, but a tube in tube design. The skyscraper in Madrid wasn't hit by a jet plane at high speed, so you can't compare it anyway!.
Those buildings turned to micro dust before they hit the ground. Watch the big parts of the top of the building that separates when it starts to come down, you see a big piece of building just simply go from solid to dust before it hits the ground. These parts I'm talking about are separated from the main portion of the building. It all turned to dust that's why there was a very small amount of the total mass accounted for after it was all over.
There’s a reason why most people believe in the official story. It’s the only logical one. It’s the only one that doesn’t rely on remote-controlled planes, cruise missiles, secretly placed explosives and elaborate government conspiracies. The buildings were destroyed by Al-Qaeda terrorists; they admitted to doing it. The government was not involved. I’m not a government agent. I’m not a sheep. I’m just using common sense.
@TimothyRaymond1 your a sheep that is not using any common sense because what you have stated shows you indeed are ignorant in many areas. Sorry it's just the truth, when you post ignorant stuff you get called out. You are ignorant.
to all you gov. shills that defend the Corp.Gov.Criminals, i hope you are getting very paid well and can live with yourself for helping to usher in the police state aka NWO, Has it ever occured to you that your children and grandchildren will have to live in the police state you are helping create??If you are a shill you are a piece of shit cuz you dont care about your own family. If you are a average citizen you are brain dead.
If there was a structural failure there needs to be an investigation into what when wrong so this doesn't happen again. So that engeneers can learn from their mistakes in the building of the towers. FEMA won't allow it for some reason.
@bryanmessina lol of course they wont allow it cuz the gov. shipped the evidence to china as fast as they could load it on ships. Last time i heard whoever tries to hide or destroy evidence in a crime scene is most likely the guilty party.Wouldnt you think that the gov. would be the first to demand an investigation to find out who did this to our country??? Well only if the finger wouldnt point back at them.
By the way the Madrid building fire the building was made of poured concrete covered steel which has a completely different set of structural properties, please go back to school and get an education, retard.
Pentagon center of US defense standard chimerical jet liner flies in restricted air space 45 minutes after WTC. And guess what they could not even evacuate the Pentagon their were casualties in it. And you cannot say this is not a secure location. Building 7 near free fall collapse no jet no jet fuel standard office fires slight damage from WTC on perhaps one side yet symmetrical collapse into own foot print..
Who says they conspired with alqaeda the only people saying alqaeda had anything to do with is you guys the real conspiracy theorist. Their is bomb residue it just has not been found by NIST because they refuse to look for it. The FBI admits there is no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9-11. This is 100% controlled demolition especially building 7 it is undeniable buildings are not built to collapse that is why.
Is it a coincidence that both towers start collapsing AT THE POINT OF IMPACT? If it was planted explodesives, the start of the collapse would have been elsewhere. The conspiracy theory must include Alqueda working with other group(s) including the "U.S. inside job" people. RIDICULOUS!
@interstategar You argument is ridiculous at face value the collapse sequence would have been started where the plane hit if it was pre set up you think they would want to look exactly like your standard controlled demolition.
@Quintos Your statement is a fog. Again there is no physical evidence like bomb residue anywhere. Who is "they"? Explain how the "they" conspired WITH Alqueda. You people beleiving in U.S. conspirators are just farting in the wind. Your theories stink.
@kernafval The building did not collapse parts of it fell off buddy... And is it steel framed?? Even if it was it does not look at like the building 7 collapse.
i did not say anything about building 7. ''The building did not collapse parts of it fell off buddy...'' Same thing for the towers: the south towers tilts a bit, before it comes down. So why did the buildings collapse?
@kernafval They were blown up you can see the core columns "collapse" straight down and turn to powder apparently following the path of least resistance would it of been to the side had there of been no exothermic reaction? The towers were pulverized and you can see the antenna droop in the North tower before collapse suggesting the columns were cut.
@Quintos or suggesting that a plane went right trough.... The North tower was hit in the middle. At first the corners were able to carry the load, the colomns were probably already smashed away by the first impact. Dont forget that the structure did not only have to carry the top part of the building, but also a plane. And I am happy to see that there are also healthy thinking people like TomBoultonTV.
@Quintos Lets take a cheerleader piramid for example: There is no problem when you have a 5 4 3 2 1 construction (from bottom to top). But when you remove a layer, lets take the layer of 3 people, the two layers above will come down, and no way that the remaining layers will be able to carry the extra load.
@kernafval So now a steel framed building, is equivalent to a stack of cheerleaders very scientific.. Anyways, no layer was removed from building 7, it was not hit by a jet. Also the cheer leader would not fall through the rest of the cheerleaders straight down, she would follow the path of least resistance which would not be the cheerleaders below her but the gaps of air. Thus the building should not of have fallen straight down but rather to the side in all three cases.
@Quintos Once again: I didnt say anything about building 7. The path of least resistace is were most the damage is: In the core of the building. A plane of a few tons smashed straight trough it remember?
@kernafval What about the rest of building intact underneath.What about the core columns collapsing straight down and becoming a fine powder. The energy transfer from those two planes should not of pulverized three buildings, or caused the type of collapse we see in building 7 period. Let alone the molten metal or the sounds of a rapid explosive sequence during collapse reported by firemen.
@jessem166 First, the Official theories should be included in your rant. Second, YOU have some respect for those trying to prevent another 911 from happening. They're working to SAVE YOUR ASS! My step-father lost half his company in the WTC, so have some respect yourself! We deserve answers! Not some jackass with no brain who believes pathological and historic liars! Not all theories are correct, but there's SOLID evidence that this was an inside job - SOLID!
Btw guys keep the convo civilized, none of us really know exactly what happened. I just wanted to make one more point. Idk where the video is but its somewhere on here that really opens your eyes to it possibly being a collapse. When tower 2 comes down you can see the outer layer snapping under the weight of the building right where the plane crashed. No bomb would be able to make that effect. Ill try and find the clip and post it on here and you guys can take from it what you will
@TheOilerfan18 Yes, true; and if you watch closely you'll see molten metal spew from that corner as well. But that says nothing about huge steel girders and concrete being hurled outwards into other buildings, and the solid building structure under the impact point that was more than enough to hold the collapsed part. It all just exploded! Even the top explodes - what was on top of that? Why believe liars? What's wrong with finding the truth?
ok im leaning to this being a collapse. i have spent lots of time watching and studying about this. I really wanna clear this up for everyone so we dont have to deal with it anymore. This is the first time EVER that a 737 jet loaded with fuel has crashed into a building at full speed. No other steel frame skyscraper that has dealt with fires can say the same. These buildings relied on the outer skeleton for strength and when the planes hit it took out roughly 25%. BTW i saw the 2 planes in NYC
When asked for his thoughts on Sep11th, Benjamin Netanyahu said :
"It's very good..." . What he meant was that its very good for Zionism, for it could now count the majority of the world to back it's inhuman and monstrous war crimes against the Palestinians.
Oh, America. Why do you do and say nothing when Israel commits war crimes against Arab Christians in Palestine ? We know that you hate us because we are Muslims, but you don't even stand up for your fellow Christians in Palestine.
The second tower to be hit/struck/whatever was the first to "collapse". Therefore, all the ensuing "fire caused structural integrity" crap that's bandied about is FALSE.
Brother Nathanael is a fake, he still believes wikileaks is not a zionist trick - invented psychology thousands of years ago but they called it Kabbalah mossad did 7/7/2005 london
Ahmadinejad is a zionist puppet who wants the Israel Iran war
Alex Jones, Webster tarpley, Max Keiser puppets
Bradley Manning is fictitious and computer generated
Jane Standley - reported that wtc 7 collapsed before it did
Firstly steel doesn't need to melt, high temperatures can make it expand and weaken the steel and that would easily be sufficient to cause structural failure. The building collapses from the points where the planes hit, both times, it explodes from top to bottom, demolitions never work this way. If the bottom of the building is taken out with explosives, then as the building falls the top will gradually sink, but remain kind of intact till it hits the ground. WTC blazed from top to bottom..
SEE THE FRAME AT 1'46" ON THE VIDEO, IN THE RIGHT SIDE DOWN YOU CAN SEE A LOT OF SMOKE! WHERE IT CAME FROM? Search the rare footage of the collapse from reverse angle.
I love people who claim they collapsed "cause of some fires" and fail to take into account the fact that a giant airliner PLOWED directly into the building WAY above safe speeds (500mph+ if I recall correctly) That's bound to do a good bit of damage right there, is it not? Besides, a demolition? Surley the workers in the buildings would notice people planting bombs in thier own damned buildings. No way you can do that(and get enough to bring the building down) without SOMEONE noticing.
Wow! I had no idea you were an expert on controlled demolitions, you seem to know everything about the subject. Moron, so what if they were the first skyscrapers to collapse, you know what else was a first, Chernobyl, but people didn't say that was an inside job, and you know why, CUZ IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FOR THE USSR TO DESTROY THEIR OWN BUILDING/TOWNS!
@CptCool2 This does make sense though or at least have a sick result. Result: Money a.k.a oil and power.
Chernobyl wasn't an inside job because there wasn't a side result but for 9/11 there are many obvious reasons to kill thousands of people. Humans are sick so why wouldn't they blow up a tons of people to gain power and money, it happened a lot in history so why not for 9/11?
The Architects who built the towers have acknowledged that, if subjected to a fire intense and hot enough, the steel beams could bend in on themselves, causing total structural destruction of each floor.
This happened on each floor because the fire burnt the whole way down one of the elevator shafts. The almost detonation like explosions on each floor are simply the contents of the floors being blown out under the collapsing weight of the building above it.
@TomBoultonTV welll how do you explain NYFD stating that the fire was able to be extinguished and that they heared numerous explosions before it colasped and the lobbey windows wer blown out at the bottom of the south tower ? and north tower ? they wer there you were not
@TomBoultonTV welll how do you explain NYFD stating that the fire was able to be extinguished and that they heared numerous explosions before it colasped and the lobbey windows wer blown out at the bottom of the south tower ? and north tower ? they wer there you were not and also the explination for this was a ball of fire went raging down an elevator shaft ??? when the alevator shafts were air sealed
@vibeackermann You honestly think that the internal structural integrity of a building is going to remain intact after a 500 tonne jet-plane crashes into it at 550MPH, releasing 30,000 gallons of high-octane, long burning jet fuel? The reason for the 'explosions' was the fire breaking out through the path of least resistance down the already compromised elevator shafts.
The weight of 30 floors of a skyscraper is guaranteed to be enough to blow out the windows of the floor beneath it.
@TomBoultonTV OH ALSO AND NO i dont think the inter structural integiry of a building is going to remina 100% perfect however get one thing straight that jet fuel was not long burning its highly flammable and would burn off within 25 mins, and blow out the windows 30 floors beneath ? were talking at least 70-75 floors ?so you can put that bullshit back in your mouth
@TomBoultonTV listen , ive seen a documentry of one of the so called "architectd" and he stated those buildings where designed.....to withsatand 4 jumbo kets hitting them, regardless during the collapse the cap a.k.a the top of the building would have fell of into the tstreet as 70% of the buldings structure was fine, also explain this why is it that there were pools of molten steel underneath both world trade centers, and that the fire burned for over 2 months jet fuel does not burn that long
@TomBoultonTV another thing both towers collapsed identically, the only diffrent being the duration the held up and the duration of the collapse, if this so called collapse was true why are so many people asking questions, there so many, flaws in this thoery all bullshit feeding us, face it the us government blew up the worlse trade center so they could declare war on iraq, steal there oil and introduce the patriotic act, its all bullshit, air cannot travel down air sealed vents
@TomBoultonTV look at the core of the north tower after it collapses its obliterated, if the pancake theory was true, the core would still stand its absoutley buckled..
@TOM- both of those world trade centers were structerly enginered to withstand attacks like they did, for example the north tower had 350 tone arial mast, the structer had to be strong to hold that up, the south tower didnt even have one and that collapsed exactly the same.
@TomBoultonTV you still have not answered my question about the fire fighters, they were there you wernt simple as facts dont lie, listen to the audio of chief audio plamer, dont give me that bullshit that he wasnt in the main impact zone, if those fires were so hot to weaken the structure he wouldnt have got to the floor he did and also, they wouldnt be as many surviors.........inside the tower.................
@TomBoultonTV The problem is no evidence is provided to support your claims, most of the fire affected was destroyed remember?? And NIST only tested a small percentage which of was not exposed to fires hot enough to even weaken. Real world tests by NIST only fatigued the frame about 3 inches or so and this with fires hotter then those on 9-11. Only in the FAKE highly MANIPULATED computer simulation do we get huge deformations why because they tweak the settings to fit the proper results.
Most if not all of the fire affected steel tested under 250 degrees Celsius well below the temperatures needed to weaken the steel of the WTC on top of that the steel was fire proofed and there is no energy for all of it to be automatically removed over several floors in all different directions. PERIOD BULL SHIT 100% DEMOLITION In less you want to imply the plane turned into a thousands of shotguns pointed in all different directions magically.
Ill SOURCE NIST AND IMPROBABLE COLLAPSE By Steven E Jones etc. IMPROBABLY COLLAPSE mainly references NIST which I double checked and indeed NIST tests showed that fire affected steel only reached temperatures of 250 degrees Celsius. Perhaps the fire was hotter which is actually irrelevant.
We have to see, the religion is the bad thing! Religion kill people, because they are not believers. Not because they are kill the believers, just because... religion wants to control everything!
The world is a disc an the sun goes around this world! The leaders ot the world religions wants not to seperate their power anymore!
My oppinion, not a Fakt!
We can life in peace! Let´s help each other!
But we are all gone burn in a hell! human engineered hell
It's amazing how ignorant some people are in this country. AMAZING!!!!
Go ahead and repeat what the media and government tell you. It was evil muslims who did it..... we had no idea this was going to happen. Blah blah blah.
Zionist controlled media cannot speak truth. It's not something they comprehend, nor something that they feel any motivation to do. This was a carefully orchestrated plan to garner support from the US citizens for illegal wars in the middle east.
@LLetter82 nicely put ...afterall they needed a motive that american's could relate too..because most people don't care about all the geonocide and terrible thing's that happen in other countries untill it happen's on thier own soil
and what has saddam hussein and how he treated his people got to do with 9/11
or terrorism for that matter ...why did people suddenly develope morals and empathy for the iraqi people after 9/11...just goe's to show how much the media controls peoples mind's
There are so many socio-political factors that prove that it was extremist muslims, it's a disgrace that you blame the very country that it happened to, look at the president or Iran, he's just agreed with you that 9/11 was organised by America, this coming from the same man that denied the holocaust and said he wants to eradicate Israel off the planet.
You ideal is very flawed.
I have no doubt it was Muslims, How else could you explain the bombngs in London, or Madrid, or Bali?
@newman015 You wanna know why? Because Americans cannot bring themselves to understand why anyone else int he world could possibly hate them that much. The bastion of freedom and liberty. Who could hate that. But that is the rub. It actually has NOTHING to do with that. It has to do with the United States policies in the middle east and their affect on the islamic world.
Yeh man straight up, people have just blamed the Jews again... as usual as a scapegoat. I mean what the fuck has it got to do with Zionists/Jews I think out of the 3000 odd people that died in 9/11 about 200 were Jewish, That really doesn't sound like a well orchastrated plan if ever there was one.
Muslims have also just threatened to carry out Mumbai Commando style raids across Europe, how does that have anything to do with Jews.
or maybe 2 planes flew into the buildings and the burning fuel weakend steel till it collapsed and could not suppot itself and top floor falls on next and does so so quickly the building cant shoot off like it says im just sayin no go watch 9/11 by the naudet bros. the buildings had different support structure styles so thats y itt fell like that dumbass
Let me tell you that's some impressive bomb setting to hide thousands of tonnes of explosive to annihilate a building, have each floor collapse EXACTLY in line with the falling tower and still not have anyone inside the tower noticing any of the explosives hidden or being brought in.
so these building just crushed thierselves ?..well if thats the case then these demolition experts should save some money and time when demolishing buildings in the future..alls they need to do is put explosives on 1 or 2 floors and let the buildings crush themselves....BUILDINGS DON'T CRUSH THEMSELVES it's the biggest load of bullshit i've ever heard ..and its got nothing to do with the size of the towers because look at building 7 exactly the same collapse
neter you are a pot smoking retard and your ignorance discusts me, everything you said about 9/11 was wrong, they have moutains of info about the 4 planes, the 1800 degree burning jet fuel weaked/melted the fucking support beams! None of those are world firsts either, where are you getting this shit, jesus christ your a fucking moron! there is so much evidence proving it was not faked you fuck tard, from the FAA to eye witness's! i had family in the pentagon when it was hit, go fuck yourself
Hmm, how I think about it is, is that if it was the government and they tried to make terrorists do it, why the fuck would the government then hijack 4 airliners, letting die 4 pilots who we're aware of the plan and knew they would die, and not instead just bomb the building and said terrorists did it? Way easier, less people killed, and not press attention all the time observating and surveying the twin towers. Think about that
@92brandonb Theres no evedince then why keep talking and bringing up shit that doesnt even matter>>?? loll u stupid fuck and all the other people SAD just laugh at ya'll very funny.
@jeffs1000 don't waste any time talking to these no brain with no COMMON sense its VERY sad. The Buildings Collapse by the fire and the crash by the plane lolol its very simple to understand and with the mind set and knowledge people should already think and know that.
this 9/11 truth might be bs...BUT dont think that the U.S. and Israel are not responsible for extremists hating us enough to do something like this..and dont think that they didnt know it was coming
all of you who agreed that there was demolition being done are stupid liberal obama lovers that are what i call terrorists. why would they demolition when there is like thousands of people inside huh...you guys are so dumb
uh, a fully fueled airliner, doing over 500 mph, would bring down about anything...it's a miracle that the plane just didn't immediately collapse the building. There was a news story a few years ago about a buring truck on a bridge that melted the steel and collapsed the bridge. Why is this so hard to accept--it's all been verified by many many scientists and engineers that the planes and fire alone were enough!
we need to rvolution our goverment is corrupt we need to start over impeach congress president and its time for a revolution there is no evedince but high treason
No sound of explosions in any footage made,but still, a explosive shockwave shook the helicopter...yeah...the helicopter shook because of a massive Scycraper falling to the ground, moving an enormous quantity of air.That's why people got knocked over by the wind when the building collapsed.Then a skycraper in madrid burned completely without any other structural damage(like a plane hitting it)and with a diferent kind of fire, and they compare it.No demoliton explosions are eard...this vid is BS
Demolition usually equates to the building falling straight down, so as to not take out anything around it, right? Explosives are planted to do this. The WTC buildings collapsed on an angle, not straight down. This means there was a structural flaw, ie. the burning jet fuel melting the supports. The explosions were dust and debris being ejected AFTER the collapse began, meaning the top was effectively shoving the particles out of any openings it could find much like backdraft.
"9/11 saw 4 planes hijacked....none were intercepted a first in air force history" Want to what else is a first? 4 planes being hijacked by terrorists.
i know im going to get a bunch of people that use profanity on me because there upset i voice my opinion that they don't agree with cussing at me if thats the case why all the hostility whats the matter you can't handle the truth that it wasn 't possibly osama bin laden but maybe the people were lied to by are own government so go a head cuss at me show your ignorance
not only was there a fire which caused the steel in the building to bend but there was also a 300 ton airplane that went right into it which probably did something to the towers main support.
These Terrorists are STILL boarding airplanes and trying to kill Americans and you STILL have a problem believing it was radical islamists that brought the towers down?
What about the underwear bomber? Was he working for bush too?
You Twoofers are the ones who need to wake up. Ask the 100+ Pakis that were just suicide bombed yesterday if they believe in suicide bombers.
BTW - To anyone new into this subject. The firefighters in minute four have specifically spoken out against the use of this peice of video in support of conspiracy theories/videos like this. They say "It looked like" not "it was" and they don't appreciate being quoted out of context like this.
Unfortunately the Twoofer assholes don't respect anyone - especially not the dead on that day. If they did they would stop spreading these BS theories.
For those none believers who think that planes bought down 2 steel/concrete biuldings for the first time in the history of man, ask your self this! NO plane hit biulding 7 so it didnt callapse with so called jet fuel - you only have to see how it fell in its own footprint to realise it was a controlled job to bring it down ! SO WHEN WAS BIULDING 7 RIGGED ? Before the trade centres were hit or during ? come on WAKEY WAKEY !
The one thing the 9/11 commission apparently forgot to cover up was the fact that once the rubble was shipped over seas out of ground zero, that non-american scientists would have access to it. Thank god they did, cause they found an over-abundance or uncharged fragments of Nanothermite all through the rubble. I guess Ole Rudy shoulda sifted through it a bit before he shipped it out! BUSTED! Proven fact in "The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2." in an article by Niels H. Harrit
some of your arguments are based on physical laws and then you really ask wehre the energy comes from needed for a collaps???
Its simply the gravitation. If only one or two floors of steel were molten by the extrem heat of the burning kerosen they are accelerated by gravitation. the floors under them can't stand forces like that.
They collaps so fast that there is not enough resistance to tilt the top...
not true "They collaps so fast that there is not enough resistance to tilt the top" not as fast, you actually need a lot of energy to pull the resistance below and allow freefall, only explosive pull of vacum can do that
An explosion would lead to the opposite of a vacuum.
One of the floors began to collaps on one side of the tower than the one under it. Until the whole tower collapsed the top tilt a little bit and after that it just went down.
That there has to be a lot of pressure is easy to see some floors under the collapsing ones. There are bursting windows because of the high pressure.
Kerosene can not burn hot, nor long enough to melt steel, without the constant addition of more kerosene. You'd have to be seriously brain damaged to think otherwise. The fire did not bring them down, it wasn't consistent enough, no fuel fire is, it burns itself out too quick. Haven't you ever tried to light a fire and have to use gasoline or some alternative. Burns itself right out! There's no logic to what your saying.
And you do really think there wasnt anything in there except of steel? no desks, walls - which werent made of stone - or paper? And do you think that the plane did not damage anything of the construction?
@fireluke112, i like how you set your lie up, EXTREME kerosene, your full of shit, it burns at its highest, 700-900 degrees, and that would be a fire that is being constantly fed fuel, after impact most of the karosene was burned off and was in the process of COOLING, unless the towers had karosene on tap in the break room, i take your approach full of shit, what govt branch you work for, you can tell i wont say anything
@LilBaby1366 the question i ask is if the fire was hot enough to melt the steel girders how can she be standing right thier where the plane entered the building
@truthfilter Well.. she could've crawled through the debri.. of might have hidden somewhere safe when the plane went into the building... then after a bit.. she probally crawled out of it.. then waved for help but jumped..
If steel isn't weakened by intense fire (nevermind the impact!!!) then why would they have to put fire proofing around the steel frames in the first place? ... get your god damn heads out of your asses.
not cuz of fire stupid cuz the way the planes hit the building...the angle they hit...and the intense heat weakened the support frames...didint melt them
....and it removed the fireproofing, and thermal expansion caused residual yield stresses, and the floors were simply-supported on tiny weld-tabs, and the floors sagged and pulled on the walls and columns, etc etc etc!
Ich finde die gebäude sind für ein geplantes attentat zu perfekt zusammen gefallen... ich würde schon fast behaupten dass es eine geplante sprengung war. wenn man sich mal baupläne von den türmen anschaut sollte man eigendlich erkenenn können dass die nicht so einfach zusammenfallen können. da steckt mehr dahinter...
No single theory, including the reference to the burning building in Madrid where, by the way, the structural integrity of the building was not breached to begin with, can be applied here. These buildings were enormous. Beginning at the point of collapse, the cascading effect would have been unstoppable. OF COURSE it looked like a series of detonations. You have one floor slamming into the next, expelling the air in between.
mr dasher: every one involved including NIST and the MIT engineer who presented this 'theroy' has moved away from the 'unstoppable' cascade theroy. but you just go ahead and continue on in your ignorance. of course, it looked like a controlled demolition? are you retarded??
Moved away from? And what have they moved closer to? Look at the follow up NIST issued August of 2009. They continue to support a "domino" (their word) reaction, especially with WTC 7. And to answer your concerns about me. I'm far from ignorant. I'm actually pretty knowledgeable. Retarded? Not that either.
... a lot of facts, possible or impossible but just as realistic, have been carried out surrounding the mystery of this horrific tragedy... Governments in the past have killed their own people, some certainly continue to practice such bizarre routines to the present day...
How on earth can you be so sure your own (US) government isn't capable of such a sick act, an inside job gruesomly presented as bare terrorist attack?
hey i agree completely. i think anyone here (in the US) with half a brain knows they aren't telling us everything. the evidence right here on youtube is too great to deny.
follow the money...right to the sickening corporate political whores who coopted this once great Nation. ray-gun, bu$h I, clin-ton, bu$h II, and now $now-bama. where is the significant difference? heads out of asses on the count of three!
The government wouldn't be stupid enough?! Honey, look at the world we live in - all sorts of terror and fright are forced on people by governments and those close to the governments... Maybe (and I say MAYBE) the US government wouldn't be stupid enough to do something like this, but still remember ANYTHING is possible... Participating in worldwide wars, whether for economical reasons or otherwise, why wouldn't the government perform something perverse as this?...
if this was an inside job SOMEONE would blow the whistle eventually. no government would be stupid enough to pull a stunt like this - it's too risky. and these are not controlled demolitions. have you seen a controlled demolition? they don't look like this!
Yes I have seen a controlled demolition and yes I know they don't look like that. And no the government wouldn't be stupid enough. If anyone has seen a demolition there is much drilling in the concrete colums and wiring everywhere. No way could a demolition setup go unoticed, that's just dumb to even think about?
The structure is made up of a large steel core and outer steel columns with floor trusses connecting connecting the two. The fire did not melt, but warped the floor trusses. The floor trusses were holding the structure together after the destruction of the core from impact. Once the floor trusses failed the floors above came crashing down on the weakened structure. The smoke you see coming out of the building is coursed by several hundred-thousand tons falling into fire.
The JFK conspiracy all over again. This is not about getting to any real truth. It's about making money and don't let anyone tell you any different.
RetroVGamer 1 month ago
OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Buy my book and DVD. 10 years later. OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Look at this evidence. Buy my book and DVD. 30 years later. OMG what happened? Was it a conspiracy? Look at this evidence. Buy my book and DVD. 50 years later. We have new evidence. See what guy over there. He's suspicious looking, by the way. Buy my book and DVD.
RetroVGamer 1 month ago
for a different perspective chech out these sites
triple w(dot)drjudywood(dot)com triple w(dot)wheredidtheretowersgo(dot)com
triple w(dot)checkthevidence(dot)com
mrcc1955 2 months ago
This video is the DUMBEST shit I have ever seen. LOL............RETARDED.
Holymakinaw 3 months ago
you are all fools
LTACS 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Will some day mankind know what really happened on 9/11?
nareba1980jacara 4 months ago
Wow. some people just don't see a building being ripped apart by explosives even when it's right in front of them. It looks different when they're demolished from the top down, but you can still see the buildings exploding as they go downward...otherwise, why is the concrete turning to dust before it even hits the ground? Can that be explained? It is OBVIOUS to me at 1:47+. SOOOOOO UNBELIEVABLY OBVIOUS you'd have to be blind to not see it.
rainstormseattle 4 months ago
Fucking idiot
netkongen 5 months ago
Yeah the deaths of all of those Americian's is fake.
penguinsnap 5 months ago
wenn die usa als einziges land der welt es schaffen mit alu-flugzeugen durch stahlhochhäuser zu fliegen, warum schießen sie dann nicht mit alu-munition auf panzer????????????????
4711im 5 months ago
A. The US has never shot down a passenger plane that has been hijacked..most of the time the hijacked plane is ordered to fly to a different location and land.
B. You all seen the planes hit the buildings..they were full of jet fuel..the impact and then the melting of the steel frame by the intense heat made the buildings fall
C.We own the Arab and Muslium world NOTHING. Stop blowing crap up and leave other countries and religons alone and we WOULD NOT HAVE ANY PROBLEMS!!!
craiger11000 5 months ago
Only GOD knows how these towers collapsed. By Planes or Bomb Inside the towers.
mrfahadmehar 6 months ago
@mrfahadmehar fuck off bringin your religious views here
SteoMurraay10 5 months ago
@SteoMurraay10 Fuck You 2 man
mrfahadmehar 5 months ago
Why do people keep saying that the towers collapsed like a controlled demolition? It was NOTHING like a controlled demolition. Look at the video. The building breaks at the point the plane hit and it pancakes down from the top.
In other words, Truthers are full of shit.
pvthitch 6 months ago
@pvthitch
pancaketheory requires a piledriver. there was none. the top of the building is turned to dust.
result of "pancaking" would be floors piled up. wich of course there werent.
110 floors "collapsed" in aprx 14 seconds. you cant even clap that fast.
some other forced made this possible.
think about it.
xNAJAFx 5 months ago
9/11 was done by muslims bacyase the TV say it.
yassin166 6 months ago
guys i am tellingyou ,we owe a huge apologise to arabs and mus.
noequalusername 6 months ago
@noequalusername I never thought bad as muslim about the american people (:
yassin166 6 months ago
I looked at video of high rise buildings that collapsed due to earthquake here on YouTube. Considering that the energy output of an earthquake would be significantly stronger than a plane slamming into a building I found it interesting that they just fell over and when they came apart the dust and height of the debris didn't exceed the first few floors of the surrounding buildings. WTC reminds me of fireworks going off.
dougsmom1983 7 months ago
There's still truthers out there? HaHaHaHaHa! Truthers have as much credibility as those nut jobs who thought the world was going to end May 21!!! It takes a weak and gullible mind to actually believe this conspiracy shit!!
jeffkrofd 7 months ago
@jeffkrofd gullible minds are immune to facts and they also believe the media unquestionably! It was "conspiracy nut jobs" who first were laughed at by the masses for saying the world was round also. Conspiracy nut jobs also seem to know who the next Prime Minister . Presidents will be 3 - 5 years in advance of an election. A lot of conspiracies are found to be true eventually history has proven that. And who are you to laugh at some one else's opinion especially when it accounts for details!
galaxything 4 months ago
@jeffkrofd Grow some fucking balls you dumb fucking sheep and actually do some research! Dismissal before investigation is the worst form of arrogance! And arrogant you are!
galaxything 4 months ago
@jeffkrofd Oh and 9/11 truthers stand for truth in general, thats why they like Ron Paul dumb ass! He is the only guy actually talking truth, wanting the fed reserve transparent etc... You really need to wake up!
galaxything 4 months ago
@galaxything Ron Paul has denied there was any conspiracy behind 911 time and time again! Dumb ass! I get my information in the real world from scientific evidence by reputable scientists and journalist! You probably get your info on the internet from conspiracy freaks! And it was people that believed in rational thinking that figured out the earth was round through science and mathematics not conspiracies! I just find it so humorous at how stupid people can be! HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!
jeffkrofd 4 months ago
People keep forgetting the WTC towers had no internal columns. They were not normal buildings, but a tube in tube design. The skyscraper in Madrid wasn't hit by a jet plane at high speed, so you can't compare it anyway!.
MaxwellEindhoven 7 months ago
Those buildings turned to micro dust before they hit the ground. Watch the big parts of the top of the building that separates when it starts to come down, you see a big piece of building just simply go from solid to dust before it hits the ground. These parts I'm talking about are separated from the main portion of the building. It all turned to dust that's why there was a very small amount of the total mass accounted for after it was all over.
orange70383 7 months ago
There’s a reason why most people believe in the official story. It’s the only logical one. It’s the only one that doesn’t rely on remote-controlled planes, cruise missiles, secretly placed explosives and elaborate government conspiracies. The buildings were destroyed by Al-Qaeda terrorists; they admitted to doing it. The government was not involved. I’m not a government agent. I’m not a sheep. I’m just using common sense.
TimothyRaymond1 7 months ago
@TimothyRaymond1 your a sheep that is not using any common sense because what you have stated shows you indeed are ignorant in many areas. Sorry it's just the truth, when you post ignorant stuff you get called out. You are ignorant.
orange70383 7 months ago
2:00 pwned
NotBrennanWasHereNOT 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Explosion in basement of WTC1 and WTC2 was of the same type as Fukushima Daichi reactor 3.
MINI NUKES (HYDROGEN) in basement
The only difference:
....
illuminati BushClinton did the first two as planned
***
For the FULL STORY -- Google----
911 for dummies
Truth666 8 months ago
Minute 7:20 in the low left corner appears one ufo
nikotoys 8 months ago
to all you gov. shills that defend the Corp.Gov.Criminals, i hope you are getting very paid well and can live with yourself for helping to usher in the police state aka NWO, Has it ever occured to you that your children and grandchildren will have to live in the police state you are helping create??If you are a shill you are a piece of shit cuz you dont care about your own family. If you are a average citizen you are brain dead.
rammer561 8 months ago
@rammer561 Ha ,, you kidding? They won't pay them beyond what they are useful for. They are dumber than dirt if they think so.
syyenergy7 7 months ago
If there was a structural failure there needs to be an investigation into what when wrong so this doesn't happen again. So that engeneers can learn from their mistakes in the building of the towers. FEMA won't allow it for some reason.
bryanmessina 8 months ago
@bryanmessina lol of course they wont allow it cuz the gov. shipped the evidence to china as fast as they could load it on ships. Last time i heard whoever tries to hide or destroy evidence in a crime scene is most likely the guilty party.Wouldnt you think that the gov. would be the first to demand an investigation to find out who did this to our country??? Well only if the finger wouldnt point back at them.
rammer561 8 months ago
By the way the Madrid building fire the building was made of poured concrete covered steel which has a completely different set of structural properties, please go back to school and get an education, retard.
UncleSnaf 9 months ago
Pentagon center of US defense standard chimerical jet liner flies in restricted air space 45 minutes after WTC. And guess what they could not even evacuate the Pentagon their were casualties in it. And you cannot say this is not a secure location. Building 7 near free fall collapse no jet no jet fuel standard office fires slight damage from WTC on perhaps one side yet symmetrical collapse into own foot print..
Quintos 9 months ago
Who says they conspired with alqaeda the only people saying alqaeda had anything to do with is you guys the real conspiracy theorist. Their is bomb residue it just has not been found by NIST because they refuse to look for it. The FBI admits there is no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 9-11. This is 100% controlled demolition especially building 7 it is undeniable buildings are not built to collapse that is why.
Quintos 9 months ago
Is it a coincidence that both towers start collapsing AT THE POINT OF IMPACT? If it was planted explodesives, the start of the collapse would have been elsewhere. The conspiracy theory must include Alqueda working with other group(s) including the "U.S. inside job" people. RIDICULOUS!
interstategar 9 months ago
@interstategar You argument is ridiculous at face value the collapse sequence would have been started where the plane hit if it was pre set up you think they would want to look exactly like your standard controlled demolition.
Quintos 9 months ago
@Quintos Your statement is a fog. Again there is no physical evidence like bomb residue anywhere. Who is "they"? Explain how the "they" conspired WITH Alqueda. You people beleiving in U.S. conspirators are just farting in the wind. Your theories stink.
interstategar 9 months ago
watch?v=XnPEUaVT7mg&feature=related who says a building can't collapse because of a fire should watch this video and think again.
kernafval 9 months ago
@kernafval The building did not collapse parts of it fell off buddy... And is it steel framed?? Even if it was it does not look at like the building 7 collapse.
Quintos 9 months ago
@Quintos
i did not say anything about building 7. ''The building did not collapse parts of it fell off buddy...'' Same thing for the towers: the south towers tilts a bit, before it comes down. So why did the buildings collapse?
kernafval 9 months ago
@kernafval They were blown up you can see the core columns "collapse" straight down and turn to powder apparently following the path of least resistance would it of been to the side had there of been no exothermic reaction? The towers were pulverized and you can see the antenna droop in the North tower before collapse suggesting the columns were cut.
Quintos 9 months ago
@Quintos or suggesting that a plane went right trough.... The North tower was hit in the middle. At first the corners were able to carry the load, the colomns were probably already smashed away by the first impact. Dont forget that the structure did not only have to carry the top part of the building, but also a plane. And I am happy to see that there are also healthy thinking people like TomBoultonTV.
kernafval 9 months ago
@Quintos Lets take a cheerleader piramid for example: There is no problem when you have a 5 4 3 2 1 construction (from bottom to top). But when you remove a layer, lets take the layer of 3 people, the two layers above will come down, and no way that the remaining layers will be able to carry the extra load.
kernafval 9 months ago
@kernafval So now a steel framed building, is equivalent to a stack of cheerleaders very scientific.. Anyways, no layer was removed from building 7, it was not hit by a jet. Also the cheer leader would not fall through the rest of the cheerleaders straight down, she would follow the path of least resistance which would not be the cheerleaders below her but the gaps of air. Thus the building should not of have fallen straight down but rather to the side in all three cases.
Quintos 9 months ago
@Quintos Once again: I didnt say anything about building 7. The path of least resistace is were most the damage is: In the core of the building. A plane of a few tons smashed straight trough it remember?
kernafval 9 months ago
@kernafval What about the rest of building intact underneath.What about the core columns collapsing straight down and becoming a fine powder. The energy transfer from those two planes should not of pulverized three buildings, or caused the type of collapse we see in building 7 period. Let alone the molten metal or the sounds of a rapid explosive sequence during collapse reported by firemen.
Quintos 9 months ago
Rest in peace victims of 9/11 me and my family send a deep condulence to those who had family who died to the wretched Asama bin ladens ways!!!!!
pockemonrock11 9 months ago
everybody and all their god damn theories.. just shut up and have some respect.
jessem166 10 months ago
@jessem166 First, the Official theories should be included in your rant. Second, YOU have some respect for those trying to prevent another 911 from happening. They're working to SAVE YOUR ASS! My step-father lost half his company in the WTC, so have some respect yourself! We deserve answers! Not some jackass with no brain who believes pathological and historic liars! Not all theories are correct, but there's SOLID evidence that this was an inside job - SOLID!
milackk7 10 months ago
Its simple really. The buildings were compromised by the impact, the explosion, the fire and the stress from all 3 of those things.
House of cards.
marcusdolby1 11 months ago
Btw guys keep the convo civilized, none of us really know exactly what happened. I just wanted to make one more point. Idk where the video is but its somewhere on here that really opens your eyes to it possibly being a collapse. When tower 2 comes down you can see the outer layer snapping under the weight of the building right where the plane crashed. No bomb would be able to make that effect. Ill try and find the clip and post it on here and you guys can take from it what you will
TheOilerfan18 1 year ago
@TheOilerfan18 Yes, true; and if you watch closely you'll see molten metal spew from that corner as well. But that says nothing about huge steel girders and concrete being hurled outwards into other buildings, and the solid building structure under the impact point that was more than enough to hold the collapsed part. It all just exploded! Even the top explodes - what was on top of that? Why believe liars? What's wrong with finding the truth?
milackk7 10 months ago
ok im leaning to this being a collapse. i have spent lots of time watching and studying about this. I really wanna clear this up for everyone so we dont have to deal with it anymore. This is the first time EVER that a 737 jet loaded with fuel has crashed into a building at full speed. No other steel frame skyscraper that has dealt with fires can say the same. These buildings relied on the outer skeleton for strength and when the planes hit it took out roughly 25%. BTW i saw the 2 planes in NYC
TheOilerfan18 1 year ago
When asked for his thoughts on Sep11th, Benjamin Netanyahu said :
"It's very good..." . What he meant was that its very good for Zionism, for it could now count the majority of the world to back it's inhuman and monstrous war crimes against the Palestinians.
Oh, America. Why do you do and say nothing when Israel commits war crimes against Arab Christians in Palestine ? We know that you hate us because we are Muslims, but you don't even stand up for your fellow Christians in Palestine.
: (
Yahya76 1 year ago
Five words to debunk the "it was alQaida what did it ! God bless Merka!!!" nonsense:
BLACK BOXES. WHERE ARE THEY.
Yahya76 1 year ago
@Yahya76 There actually Bright orange for when things like this happens, they can find them, and they're very durable. Something is not right.
MrTripplenipple 1 year ago
The second tower to be hit/struck/whatever was the first to "collapse". Therefore, all the ensuing "fire caused structural integrity" crap that's bandied about is FALSE.
Let me clarify:
Tower is hit.
Second tower is hit.
Second tower collapses.
First tower collapses.
Do you seeeeee ?
Mossad did 9/11.
La Ilaha Il Allah, Muhammadurasullah.
Yahya76 1 year ago
That structure in Madrid wasn't hit and seriously damaged by a plane, sorry to point that out
jlsmsu12 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"how wwii started" by dr william l pierce truth
911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
wikileaks - psych ops for israel
Brother Nathanael is a fake, he still believes wikileaks is not a zionist trick - invented psychology thousands of years ago but they called it Kabbalah mossad did 7/7/2005 london
Ahmadinejad is a zionist puppet who wants the Israel Iran war
Alex Jones, Webster tarpley, Max Keiser puppets
Bradley Manning is fictitious and computer generated
Jane Standley - reported that wtc 7 collapsed before it did
daviddevall 1 year ago
pure fission bombs ...
Google "9/11 Nukes - Radiation-induced cancers"
WTCnucleardemolition 1 year ago
Firstly steel doesn't need to melt, high temperatures can make it expand and weaken the steel and that would easily be sufficient to cause structural failure. The building collapses from the points where the planes hit, both times, it explodes from top to bottom, demolitions never work this way. If the bottom of the building is taken out with explosives, then as the building falls the top will gradually sink, but remain kind of intact till it hits the ground. WTC blazed from top to bottom..
1234oldmate 1 year ago
so fuck
bluvslou 1 year ago
SEE THE FRAME AT 1'46" ON THE VIDEO, IN THE RIGHT SIDE DOWN YOU CAN SEE A LOT OF SMOKE! WHERE IT CAME FROM? Search the rare footage of the collapse from reverse angle.
PIEDEDIPIOMB0 1 year ago
1:50
Look at the smoke shooting out of a floor below the collapsed portion.
Castaril 1 year ago
I love people who claim they collapsed "cause of some fires" and fail to take into account the fact that a giant airliner PLOWED directly into the building WAY above safe speeds (500mph+ if I recall correctly) That's bound to do a good bit of damage right there, is it not? Besides, a demolition? Surley the workers in the buildings would notice people planting bombs in thier own damned buildings. No way you can do that(and get enough to bring the building down) without SOMEONE noticing.
shane9999100 1 year ago
Wow! I had no idea you were an expert on controlled demolitions, you seem to know everything about the subject. Moron, so what if they were the first skyscrapers to collapse, you know what else was a first, Chernobyl, but people didn't say that was an inside job, and you know why, CUZ IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE FOR THE USSR TO DESTROY THEIR OWN BUILDING/TOWNS!
CptCool2 1 year ago
@CptCool2 This does make sense though or at least have a sick result. Result: Money a.k.a oil and power.
Chernobyl wasn't an inside job because there wasn't a side result but for 9/11 there are many obvious reasons to kill thousands of people. Humans are sick so why wouldn't they blow up a tons of people to gain power and money, it happened a lot in history so why not for 9/11?
Fridabeekman 1 year ago
The Architects who built the towers have acknowledged that, if subjected to a fire intense and hot enough, the steel beams could bend in on themselves, causing total structural destruction of each floor.
This happened on each floor because the fire burnt the whole way down one of the elevator shafts. The almost detonation like explosions on each floor are simply the contents of the floors being blown out under the collapsing weight of the building above it.
THAT is what happened. The Truth
TomBoultonTV 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV welll how do you explain NYFD stating that the fire was able to be extinguished and that they heared numerous explosions before it colasped and the lobbey windows wer blown out at the bottom of the south tower ? and north tower ? they wer there you were not
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV welll how do you explain NYFD stating that the fire was able to be extinguished and that they heared numerous explosions before it colasped and the lobbey windows wer blown out at the bottom of the south tower ? and north tower ? they wer there you were not and also the explination for this was a ball of fire went raging down an elevator shaft ??? when the alevator shafts were air sealed
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@vibeackermann You honestly think that the internal structural integrity of a building is going to remain intact after a 500 tonne jet-plane crashes into it at 550MPH, releasing 30,000 gallons of high-octane, long burning jet fuel? The reason for the 'explosions' was the fire breaking out through the path of least resistance down the already compromised elevator shafts.
The weight of 30 floors of a skyscraper is guaranteed to be enough to blow out the windows of the floor beneath it.
Ignorant
TomBoultonTV 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV OH ALSO AND NO i dont think the inter structural integiry of a building is going to remina 100% perfect however get one thing straight that jet fuel was not long burning its highly flammable and would burn off within 25 mins, and blow out the windows 30 floors beneath ? were talking at least 70-75 floors ?so you can put that bullshit back in your mouth
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV listen , ive seen a documentry of one of the so called "architectd" and he stated those buildings where designed.....to withsatand 4 jumbo kets hitting them, regardless during the collapse the cap a.k.a the top of the building would have fell of into the tstreet as 70% of the buldings structure was fine, also explain this why is it that there were pools of molten steel underneath both world trade centers, and that the fire burned for over 2 months jet fuel does not burn that long
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV another thing both towers collapsed identically, the only diffrent being the duration the held up and the duration of the collapse, if this so called collapse was true why are so many people asking questions, there so many, flaws in this thoery all bullshit feeding us, face it the us government blew up the worlse trade center so they could declare war on iraq, steal there oil and introduce the patriotic act, its all bullshit, air cannot travel down air sealed vents
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV look at the core of the north tower after it collapses its obliterated, if the pancake theory was true, the core would still stand its absoutley buckled..
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TOM- both of those world trade centers were structerly enginered to withstand attacks like they did, for example the north tower had 350 tone arial mast, the structer had to be strong to hold that up, the south tower didnt even have one and that collapsed exactly the same.
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV you still have not answered my question about the fire fighters, they were there you wernt simple as facts dont lie, listen to the audio of chief audio plamer, dont give me that bullshit that he wasnt in the main impact zone, if those fires were so hot to weaken the structure he wouldnt have got to the floor he did and also, they wouldnt be as many surviors.........inside the tower.................
vibeackermann 1 year ago
@TomBoultonTV The problem is no evidence is provided to support your claims, most of the fire affected was destroyed remember?? And NIST only tested a small percentage which of was not exposed to fires hot enough to even weaken. Real world tests by NIST only fatigued the frame about 3 inches or so and this with fires hotter then those on 9-11. Only in the FAKE highly MANIPULATED computer simulation do we get huge deformations why because they tweak the settings to fit the proper results.
Quintos 9 months ago
Comment removed
Quintos 9 months ago
Most if not all of the fire affected steel tested under 250 degrees Celsius well below the temperatures needed to weaken the steel of the WTC on top of that the steel was fire proofed and there is no energy for all of it to be automatically removed over several floors in all different directions. PERIOD BULL SHIT 100% DEMOLITION In less you want to imply the plane turned into a thousands of shotguns pointed in all different directions magically.
Quintos 9 months ago
Why did NIST stop testing the fire affected steel from the crash site??
Why wont NIST test for explosive residue when building code requires it?
Why does NIST analysis ignore the actual collapse of WTC 1 and 2?
Why does NIST only use computer models instead of real world test to get results?
Why does NIST set beams at a constant never changing temperature in computer models?
Quintos 9 months ago
@Quintos cuz NIST works for the Criminals :)
rammer561 8 months ago
Ill SOURCE NIST AND IMPROBABLE COLLAPSE By Steven E Jones etc. IMPROBABLY COLLAPSE mainly references NIST which I double checked and indeed NIST tests showed that fire affected steel only reached temperatures of 250 degrees Celsius. Perhaps the fire was hotter which is actually irrelevant.
Quintos 9 months ago
@TomBoultonTV its been 7 months since you posted your nonsense here. Have you woken up yet or do you still wear your dunce cap?
rammer561 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Really people? Really?
You call this a collapse?
That building is exploding!!!!!!
19KamiKaze42 1 year ago
We have to see, the religion is the bad thing! Religion kill people, because they are not believers. Not because they are kill the believers, just because... religion wants to control everything!
The world is a disc an the sun goes around this world! The leaders ot the world religions wants not to seperate their power anymore!
My oppinion, not a Fakt!
We can life in peace! Let´s help each other!
But we are all gone burn in a hell! human engineered hell
Now you can scream to me
rockdahaus 1 year ago
Comment removed
crazy4you12345 1 year ago
at the end of the North Tower one of the corners up to the 30th floor were standing, but then they fell over, what could this symbolize?
BrumStarBoi 1 year ago
It's amazing how ignorant some people are in this country. AMAZING!!!!
Go ahead and repeat what the media and government tell you. It was evil muslims who did it..... we had no idea this was going to happen. Blah blah blah.
Zionist controlled media cannot speak truth. It's not something they comprehend, nor something that they feel any motivation to do. This was a carefully orchestrated plan to garner support from the US citizens for illegal wars in the middle east.
LLetter82 1 year ago 14
@LLetter82 nicely put ...afterall they needed a motive that american's could relate too..because most people don't care about all the geonocide and terrible thing's that happen in other countries untill it happen's on thier own soil
and what has saddam hussein and how he treated his people got to do with 9/11
or terrorism for that matter ...why did people suddenly develope morals and empathy for the iraqi people after 9/11...just goe's to show how much the media controls peoples mind's
truthfilter 1 year ago
I hate people like you. Why can't people accept it was extremist Muslims.
newman015 1 year ago
@newman015
Because it wasn't? It's like asking you to accept that the earth is flat...
bestideayet 1 year ago
@bestideayet
There are so many socio-political factors that prove that it was extremist muslims, it's a disgrace that you blame the very country that it happened to, look at the president or Iran, he's just agreed with you that 9/11 was organised by America, this coming from the same man that denied the holocaust and said he wants to eradicate Israel off the planet.
You ideal is very flawed.
I have no doubt it was Muslims, How else could you explain the bombngs in London, or Madrid, or Bali?
newman015 1 year ago
@newman015 You wanna know why? Because Americans cannot bring themselves to understand why anyone else int he world could possibly hate them that much. The bastion of freedom and liberty. Who could hate that. But that is the rub. It actually has NOTHING to do with that. It has to do with the United States policies in the middle east and their affect on the islamic world.
roquefortfiles 1 year ago
@roquefortfiles
Yeh man straight up, people have just blamed the Jews again... as usual as a scapegoat. I mean what the fuck has it got to do with Zionists/Jews I think out of the 3000 odd people that died in 9/11 about 200 were Jewish, That really doesn't sound like a well orchastrated plan if ever there was one.
Muslims have also just threatened to carry out Mumbai Commando style raids across Europe, how does that have anything to do with Jews.
People are just scapegoating Jews..As usual
newman015 1 year ago
or maybe 2 planes flew into the buildings and the burning fuel weakend steel till it collapsed and could not suppot itself and top floor falls on next and does so so quickly the building cant shoot off like it says im just sayin no go watch 9/11 by the naudet bros. the buildings had different support structure styles so thats y itt fell like that dumbass
swimstud567 1 year ago
(or)
swimstud567 1 year ago
Let me tell you that's some impressive bomb setting to hide thousands of tonnes of explosive to annihilate a building, have each floor collapse EXACTLY in line with the falling tower and still not have anyone inside the tower noticing any of the explosives hidden or being brought in.
jimjamgumbob 1 year ago
IT WASN'T THE FIRE THAT MADE IT COLLAPSE YOU IDIOT.
it was the inpact of the plane that hit it and started to disinagrate throughout the building.
Cyberchics711 1 year ago
so these building just crushed thierselves ?..well if thats the case then these demolition experts should save some money and time when demolishing buildings in the future..alls they need to do is put explosives on 1 or 2 floors and let the buildings crush themselves....BUILDINGS DON'T CRUSH THEMSELVES it's the biggest load of bullshit i've ever heard ..and its got nothing to do with the size of the towers because look at building 7 exactly the same collapse
truthfilter 1 year ago
neter you are a pot smoking retard and your ignorance discusts me, everything you said about 9/11 was wrong, they have moutains of info about the 4 planes, the 1800 degree burning jet fuel weaked/melted the fucking support beams! None of those are world firsts either, where are you getting this shit, jesus christ your a fucking moron! there is so much evidence proving it was not faked you fuck tard, from the FAA to eye witness's! i had family in the pentagon when it was hit, go fuck yourself
rocker4u123 1 year ago
fucking sickening, grow up you twisted bastards
Art4261 1 year ago
Hmm, how I think about it is, is that if it was the government and they tried to make terrorists do it, why the fuck would the government then hijack 4 airliners, letting die 4 pilots who we're aware of the plan and knew they would die, and not instead just bomb the building and said terrorists did it? Way easier, less people killed, and not press attention all the time observating and surveying the twin towers. Think about that
Carlos848 1 year ago
@92brandonb Theres no evedince then why keep talking and bringing up shit that doesnt even matter>>?? loll u stupid fuck and all the other people SAD just laugh at ya'll very funny.
TheGreatRandyMoss84 1 year ago
@jeffs1000 don't waste any time talking to these no brain with no COMMON sense its VERY sad. The Buildings Collapse by the fire and the crash by the plane lolol its very simple to understand and with the mind set and knowledge people should already think and know that.
TheGreatRandyMoss84 1 year ago
this 9/11 truth might be bs...BUT dont think that the U.S. and Israel are not responsible for extremists hating us enough to do something like this..and dont think that they didnt know it was coming
hailtotheking324 1 year ago
DEMOLITION......but god forbid testing american government cuz youd be taken away.....
DanielCampbell4 1 year ago
lmfaooo controlled demolition...you people are so fuckin stupid it sickens me...
SKatman115 1 year ago
all of you who agreed that there was demolition being done are stupid liberal obama lovers that are what i call terrorists. why would they demolition when there is like thousands of people inside huh...you guys are so dumb
Andrew54F 1 year ago
uh, a fully fueled airliner, doing over 500 mph, would bring down about anything...it's a miracle that the plane just didn't immediately collapse the building. There was a news story a few years ago about a buring truck on a bridge that melted the steel and collapsed the bridge. Why is this so hard to accept--it's all been verified by many many scientists and engineers that the planes and fire alone were enough!
jeffs1000 1 year ago
we need to rvolution our goverment is corrupt we need to start over impeach congress president and its time for a revolution there is no evedince but high treason
92brandonb 1 year ago
No sound of explosions in any footage made,but still, a explosive shockwave shook the helicopter...yeah...the helicopter shook because of a massive Scycraper falling to the ground, moving an enormous quantity of air.That's why people got knocked over by the wind when the building collapsed.Then a skycraper in madrid burned completely without any other structural damage(like a plane hitting it)and with a diferent kind of fire, and they compare it.No demoliton explosions are eard...this vid is BS
mestresombra 1 year ago
Looks like a classic pancake collapse to me.
whitethronebooks 1 year ago
that's absolutly DEMOLITION
ahmadshafyallam 1 year ago 12
@ahmadshafyallam
Demolition usually equates to the building falling straight down, so as to not take out anything around it, right? Explosives are planted to do this. The WTC buildings collapsed on an angle, not straight down. This means there was a structural flaw, ie. the burning jet fuel melting the supports. The explosions were dust and debris being ejected AFTER the collapse began, meaning the top was effectively shoving the particles out of any openings it could find much like backdraft.
stoogemoedude 1 year ago
ok if she needed air bad enough to survive 2000 degree heat wow good for her cause thats how hot it was suppossed to be there
yourmamac 1 year ago
"9/11 saw 4 planes hijacked....none were intercepted a first in air force history" Want to what else is a first? 4 planes being hijacked by terrorists.
tacoofdeath13337 1 year ago
i know im going to get a bunch of people that use profanity on me because there upset i voice my opinion that they don't agree with cussing at me if thats the case why all the hostility whats the matter you can't handle the truth that it wasn 't possibly osama bin laden but maybe the people were lied to by are own government so go a head cuss at me show your ignorance
irobot2009able 1 year ago
I think that it was planes that blew up
sauenkalle 1 year ago
not only was there a fire which caused the steel in the building to bend but there was also a 300 ton airplane that went right into it which probably did something to the towers main support.
SuperPipebomb 1 year ago
@SuperPipebomb u what ?
j400wel 1 year ago
that ain't a collapse, that is an explosion, a rippling wave of disintegrating explosive force.
turning acres and tons of concrete and steel into powder.
MSCearly 1 year ago
The guy who posted this video obviously knows NOTHING about how the twin towers, and how they functioned.
displaying photos of construction doesnt prove your point since you dont even have a clue of the style & technique
No matter the million tons of concrete or the thickness of beams, all that can ruin if their is enough force, KINETIC ENERGY
Second of all, the towers were built differently, with load bearing walls. Numerous videos shows steel perimeters bowing inwards indicating failure.
SplittingTheAnvil 1 year ago
These Terrorists are STILL boarding airplanes and trying to kill Americans and you STILL have a problem believing it was radical islamists that brought the towers down?
What about the underwear bomber? Was he working for bush too?
You Twoofers are the ones who need to wake up. Ask the 100+ Pakis that were just suicide bombed yesterday if they believe in suicide bombers.
negativeindustrial 1 year ago
BTW - To anyone new into this subject. The firefighters in minute four have specifically spoken out against the use of this peice of video in support of conspiracy theories/videos like this. They say "It looked like" not "it was" and they don't appreciate being quoted out of context like this.
Unfortunately the Twoofer assholes don't respect anyone - especially not the dead on that day. If they did they would stop spreading these BS theories.
negativeindustrial 1 year ago
For those none believers who think that planes bought down 2 steel/concrete biuldings for the first time in the history of man, ask your self this! NO plane hit biulding 7 so it didnt callapse with so called jet fuel - you only have to see how it fell in its own footprint to realise it was a controlled job to bring it down ! SO WHEN WAS BIULDING 7 RIGGED ? Before the trade centres were hit or during ? come on WAKEY WAKEY !
angel3ye5 1 year ago 2
The one thing the 9/11 commission apparently forgot to cover up was the fact that once the rubble was shipped over seas out of ground zero, that non-american scientists would have access to it. Thank god they did, cause they found an over-abundance or uncharged fragments of Nanothermite all through the rubble. I guess Ole Rudy shoulda sifted through it a bit before he shipped it out! BUSTED! Proven fact in "The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Vol. 2." in an article by Niels H. Harrit
BradfordJL 1 year ago
Niels H. Harrit of the Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen that is!
BradfordJL 1 year ago
BS - that is entirely impossible to prove. Anyone can say that now.
I can say I found Alien poo in the rubble after it was shipped overseas - doesn't make it true.
negativeindustrial 1 year ago
some of your arguments are based on physical laws and then you really ask wehre the energy comes from needed for a collaps???
Its simply the gravitation. If only one or two floors of steel were molten by the extrem heat of the burning kerosen they are accelerated by gravitation. the floors under them can't stand forces like that.
They collaps so fast that there is not enough resistance to tilt the top...
fireluke112 2 years ago
not true "They collaps so fast that there is not enough resistance to tilt the top" not as fast, you actually need a lot of energy to pull the resistance below and allow freefall, only explosive pull of vacum can do that
911switzerland 2 years ago
and where should the vacuum come from?
An explosion would lead to the opposite of a vacuum.
One of the floors began to collaps on one side of the tower than the one under it. Until the whole tower collapsed the top tilt a little bit and after that it just went down.
That there has to be a lot of pressure is easy to see some floors under the collapsing ones. There are bursting windows because of the high pressure.
fireluke112 2 years ago
Kerosene can not burn hot, nor long enough to melt steel, without the constant addition of more kerosene. You'd have to be seriously brain damaged to think otherwise. The fire did not bring them down, it wasn't consistent enough, no fuel fire is, it burns itself out too quick. Haven't you ever tried to light a fire and have to use gasoline or some alternative. Burns itself right out! There's no logic to what your saying.
BradfordJL 1 year ago 2
And you do really think there wasnt anything in there except of steel? no desks, walls - which werent made of stone - or paper? And do you think that the plane did not damage anything of the construction?
fireluke112 1 year ago
@fireluke112, i like how you set your lie up, EXTREME kerosene, your full of shit, it burns at its highest, 700-900 degrees, and that would be a fire that is being constantly fed fuel, after impact most of the karosene was burned off and was in the process of COOLING, unless the towers had karosene on tap in the break room, i take your approach full of shit, what govt branch you work for, you can tell i wont say anything
kixxclub 1 year ago
and i like how you support your arguments with getting abusive.
fireluke112 1 year ago
you are fcukin retarded
negativeindustrial 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@negativeindustrial "you are 'fcukin' retarded"...Fail?
ranabananafofanna 1 year ago
she was probally trapped inside on that floor and needed air
LilBaby1366 2 years ago 10
@LilBaby1366 the question i ask is if the fire was hot enough to melt the steel girders how can she be standing right thier where the plane entered the building
?
truthfilter 1 year ago
@truthfilter Well.. she could've crawled through the debri.. of might have hidden somewhere safe when the plane went into the building... then after a bit.. she probally crawled out of it.. then waved for help but jumped..
LilBaby1366 1 year ago
If steel isn't weakened by intense fire (nevermind the impact!!!) then why would they have to put fire proofing around the steel frames in the first place? ... get your god damn heads out of your asses.
makavelismith 2 years ago
not cuz of fire stupid cuz the way the planes hit the building...the angle they hit...and the intense heat weakened the support frames...didint melt them
texaspatroit25 2 years ago
....and it removed the fireproofing, and thermal expansion caused residual yield stresses, and the floors were simply-supported on tiny weld-tabs, and the floors sagged and pulled on the walls and columns, etc etc etc!
bennyv04988 2 years ago
Ich finde die gebäude sind für ein geplantes attentat zu perfekt zusammen gefallen... ich würde schon fast behaupten dass es eine geplante sprengung war. wenn man sich mal baupläne von den türmen anschaut sollte man eigendlich erkenenn können dass die nicht so einfach zusammenfallen können. da steckt mehr dahinter...
GothicTigerVIII 2 years ago
Another conspiracy theory :/
ReUsedX7 2 years ago 2
If doctors come to this country and buy out a
city ann arbor mich and panama city fla then
Buy out our women and then tell us that WE have to do WHAT they say !!!!!!!! or we dont get medical care here!!!!!!!!!!
Lets drug america up with doctors from Iran or ect!!! Dont people see it now? We are under their countrol through medical?
Obama just fixed the medical!!!!!! doesnt americans see this? doctors tell us now what to do!!!
They are buying out gas stations! Conv stores
flashingfirefly 2 years ago
No single theory, including the reference to the burning building in Madrid where, by the way, the structural integrity of the building was not breached to begin with, can be applied here. These buildings were enormous. Beginning at the point of collapse, the cascading effect would have been unstoppable. OF COURSE it looked like a series of detonations. You have one floor slamming into the next, expelling the air in between.
MrDasher01 2 years ago
mr dasher: every one involved including NIST and the MIT engineer who presented this 'theroy' has moved away from the 'unstoppable' cascade theroy. but you just go ahead and continue on in your ignorance. of course, it looked like a controlled demolition? are you retarded??
monkinator66 2 years ago
Moved away from? And what have they moved closer to? Look at the follow up NIST issued August of 2009. They continue to support a "domino" (their word) reaction, especially with WTC 7. And to answer your concerns about me. I'm far from ignorant. I'm actually pretty knowledgeable. Retarded? Not that either.
MrDasher01 2 years ago
they are moving closer to eating a giant plate of crow! haha
monkinator66 2 years ago
A german research yeam as annalized debri from the all 3 biuldings and have found the same at every one = THERMITE !
Where that come from then ?
Ask yourself 1 Q : Building 7 collapsed due to a controlled demolition - when was the explosives placed in biulding 7 ? ? ? ?
It would have taken a team a couple of days to rig a biulding of that size to bring it down
angel3ye5 2 years ago
a german research team? where did they analyze it and wat does the reasearch team specialize in? and wat is the name?
MrTm1314 2 years ago
inside job
hybrid212 2 years ago 2
... a lot of facts, possible or impossible but just as realistic, have been carried out surrounding the mystery of this horrific tragedy... Governments in the past have killed their own people, some certainly continue to practice such bizarre routines to the present day...
How on earth can you be so sure your own (US) government isn't capable of such a sick act, an inside job gruesomly presented as bare terrorist attack?
Crijevo 2 years ago 2
hey i agree completely. i think anyone here (in the US) with half a brain knows they aren't telling us everything. the evidence right here on youtube is too great to deny.
eyepatchinc 2 years ago 2
follow the money...right to the sickening corporate political whores who coopted this once great Nation. ray-gun, bu$h I, clin-ton, bu$h II, and now $now-bama. where is the significant difference? heads out of asses on the count of three!
monkinator66 2 years ago 2
The government wouldn't be stupid enough?! Honey, look at the world we live in - all sorts of terror and fright are forced on people by governments and those close to the governments... Maybe (and I say MAYBE) the US government wouldn't be stupid enough to do something like this, but still remember ANYTHING is possible... Participating in worldwide wars, whether for economical reasons or otherwise, why wouldn't the government perform something perverse as this?...
Crijevo 2 years ago
the US government wouldn't be stupid enough to do something like this,
stupid? 9/11 is the most 'profitable' buisness model on the face of the earth. some would argue that as 'stupid.'
monkinator66 2 years ago
of course he was stupid... it was George W. Bush... remember?
BooTeeFull 2 years ago
weak window......pressure gotta go somwhere...no explosion.
suzuki400boi 2 years ago
if this was an inside job SOMEONE would blow the whistle eventually. no government would be stupid enough to pull a stunt like this - it's too risky. and these are not controlled demolitions. have you seen a controlled demolition? they don't look like this!
paolox1972 2 years ago
Yes I have seen a controlled demolition and yes I know they don't look like that. And no the government wouldn't be stupid enough. If anyone has seen a demolition there is much drilling in the concrete colums and wiring everywhere. No way could a demolition setup go unoticed, that's just dumb to even think about?
suzuki400boi 2 years ago
NO EXPLOSIVES WERE USED
The structure is made up of a large steel core and outer steel columns with floor trusses connecting connecting the two. The fire did not melt, but warped the floor trusses. The floor trusses were holding the structure together after the destruction of the core from impact. Once the floor trusses failed the floors above came crashing down on the weakened structure. The smoke you see coming out of the building is coursed by several hundred-thousand tons falling into fire.
CRUHL49 2 years ago
Yep. Once the top started falling. It just pushed the rest down.
suzuki400boi 2 years ago
It's great how people see some puffs of dust as a building is collapsing and think they have proof of a massive government conspiracy.
cskillet2003 2 years ago