I've been in the WTC and trust me when I say that you would only have to wire a few floors to make that building come crashing down. Couple that with Boeing jets sitting on the top floors and you could say "bye-bye" to those buildings.
@JoshMufc101 The WTC1&2 had one main center column that essentially held up the building. If you were to wire a fewer of the higher floors only to weaken them, the amount of weight caused by the plane would simply added enough stress to bring it down. No one would even see the people putting in the explosives because all work would have centered around the center columns. This is the flimsiest building I've ever seen.
@JoshMufc101 It wouldn't matter where they hit as long as they were on the upper floors and penetrated to the support column, all of which they did very easily. This is the main reason Osama and his cohorts kept after the WTC. Because they knew they would have an excellent chance of doing massive damage versus something like the Empire State Building which would have survived very nicely.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?
Since demolition experts estimated it would take 100 men 6 months to place explosives in WTC 1, 2, & 7, how come no one witnessed any strange construction activity, wires, or boxes?
How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?
your doing the same thing as the people your trying to debunk, the evidence tends to push toward the so called 'nut jobs' so why so much effort to debunk them
golly gee...thanks a bunch 4 straightening me out on this. you idiot. and we all just fell off the turnip truck. what is amazing is the gov. expects anyone to believe ttheir conspiracy theory. there is no debunking live nanothermite that can be ignited. even years later. there is no debunking molten steel. connect the dots moron. wait!! I found their passports at the crash sites!! You were right all along! How could we have doubted you? why don't you take your crap off already?
I don't know why this video is asking Scott Forbes to verify if the other buildings were powered down. He only worked in one building how the hell should he now what happened in the other buildings. He can only state what he witnessed in his building.
It's a good thing this video was made or posted in 2007. Because as of right now, two people have claimed there was a power down. Maybe more to come in the future
You forgot to mention that Sirius (the bomb sniffing dog) was trained only for searching CARS for bombs, and would be ineffective for the explosives set up that took the WTC down. Not only that, he was locked up in his cage also. So what`s the deal with these half truths and half assed explanations?
@Colonel10110 There you go. And like I said, he was meant for searching for car bombs anyway. So the question stands. What`s with the half-truths and half assed explanations? Good liers are known for telling MOSTLY the truth to grasp you, then mix in some lies that would through the individual, or masses off. RKOwens4 is an example of such a victim. Real research shows a painfully obvious inside job.
@DKaijuGomoMan You didn`t understand what I wrote did you? Go look at the difference at what Sirius was trained for. No wonder you guys fall for the obvious lie.
@vme1111 I completely understood what you said. I'm saying that there's really almost no difference other than being a wider area of searcher. I think your getting confused of what you wrote yourself...
The truth hurts twoofers. We all know you will disregard any evidence that doesn't suit your pathetic agenda so it's impossible to convince you otherwise. "Truth Movement" R.I.P.
@thevoodooguru It has nothing to do with agreeing with me, I'm not a narcisit.. What it does have to do with is the "twoofers" claims would require thousands of good Americans to be in on the coverup. Ground Zero alone would require thousands because noone reported any steel beams showing signs of being cut or damaged due to explosives, thermite, or "super dooper nano thermite". Shanksville, 1100 investigators and volunteers worked that crime scene, 136 eyewitnesses to plane at pentagon, etc.
@mikeyt34 alrite good point but i just dont think you should generalize anyone who questions the government or 9/11 as a truther let me ask you this do you think the war on terror was a success when terrorist attacks kill a small percent of people (less than 400 a year in america) and cost us billions that could be used more productively to fight disease or help to recover the economy
whoever made this video is a jackass, cant you do it overnight? And after the alert returns to normal doesnt that make it even that much easier, you dont need a blackout to get bombs in douchebag, got 5+ days to do it overnite and the dogs wont smell anything if theyre at their posts and not doing routine sniffs round the building
@IamVendel It's hilarious to see an entrapped or extorted "duhbunker" troll such as yourself deliberately lie to cover up 9/11 spending hours of your precious time forced to "duhbunk" Global Guardian '01. You are a pee on and will be treated as such, troll.
type scott forbes 911 on youtube... there were power downs at the world trade center 2 days before 911 and he used to work at the WTC.... a lot of smoking guns
I am surprised no one has asked how many tons of explosives it would have taken to take down the building. Truck loads would have had to be brought it. Please tell me how that went unoticed. A plane flying into the side of the building is what took down the buildings. No explosives needed.
the gov schill proved it best when he said you would have to place explosives on every floor or every second floor to achieve the collapse as witnessed.Y et they want us to believe that the trauma on the few floors that day did cause what was witnessed. every official theory makes us accept contradicting statements proving their theory is flawed.thanks rk owens for giving me that insight ......debunker..Fail
RKOwens seriously needs to be awarded the Nobel Prize!!!! Every 9/11 twoofer who just can't accept that those ragheads are responsible for the attacks need to be shipped off to a different planet. Forget Mars, move them to Uranus or further!!!!
Scott Forbes is someone who worked in the world trade center! I think you better get to know these people before you debunk anything else! And he does not like being called a conspiracy theorist! As a matter of fact the only ones telling the conspiracy theories is you!!
Everyone one of your videos has a truther in your highest rated comments. Looks like you're in the minority and don't know any better. Good to see you haven't posted anything in months. Failure is your only option!
@omarlives You can go on a shipping video and see all the idiots giving each other thumbs up. So what does that prove? There are a lot of idiots out there.
@IamVendel u may be right that the majority of people are idiots. but that is never the case. the people of a society will never want war. that shows the people know better. majority rules becuz the majority knows better. the benefit of the many always outweighs the benefit of the few. but there are some things about 9/11 thats bogus, but EVERY THING COMING FROM RKOWENS IS THE BEST OF THE BEST WHEN IT COMES TO TROLLING! AND THE WEAKEST OF THE WEAK WHEN IT COMES TO 9/11 DEBUNKING.
@omarlives I am always fascinated by people like you. Those who can so easily throw reason and logic out the window. Honestly the mental gymnastics you people go through must be exhausting.
@IamVendel Speak for yourself. I'm not a truther nut who holes up in the woods with camo on, but just going by WTC 7, that's the smoking gun. Smoking gun = something shady happened
@IamVendel What garbage? If you thought that a high-rise building could potentially implode in the manner that WTC7 did, would you ever go into a building, hotel, school, hospital of any height? Of course you wouldn't... and you'd be righ. But you know that buildings DON'T fall that way. You know that buildings are much more robust... and that if/when a fire occurs, while you may have to worry about getting burned, you don't worry about the whole building falling down on top of you.
@JohnLeeMD Most people wouldn't go into a building that just had part of another one fall on it and put a massive gash in it's side. And set it on fire.
@IamVendel HAHAHA.... OK, I'll play your game (as if WTC1/2 fell ON top of WTC7). Even if that happened, it still wouldn't cause it to collapse like that. I suppose (in your hypothetical), large pieces might break and fall. And/or you'd see large sections of the building... And if it was sthat substantial, eventually the building would tumble/topple over. But to think that because of a "massive gash", it's going to cause a global collapse JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED situation... that's ridiculous.
@JohnLeeMD If such a random act can cause such a neat, straight-down collapse of a building, let me ask you this: Why even employ hightly scientific (expensive) demoliton companies to implode buildings? If all it takes is to cause a random gash and start various fires, to cause the type of collapse we saw from WTC7, why strategically place charges, cut beams, do all sorts of work? Just blow a massive gash yourself, start some fires, and save a boatload of money.
@JohnLeeMD When you saw it go down you thought it looked "controlled". So you pretty much just latched onto anyone/anything that agreed with you. And so you now come on here and proclaim that things can't have happened by any other means.
isn't the fact that, the majority of ppl do not want war and therefore are not the mass idiots, as u say, not using logic and reason? i'm a mental gymnastic klutz!
@IamVendel Just incase ur really didn't understand what i said: the fact that the majority of ppl within a country do not want war because they know better, therefore, they're not idiots, therefore, u said "there are alot of idiots out there", which is wrong.
@omarlives Okay... War=do not want. Brilliant observation. So what does that have to do with anything? Or is this some insane conspiracy theory bullshit?
@IamVendel Huh? u said most ppl are dumb. wrong. most ppl dont want war. isn't that proof to u that most ppl aren't dumb? conspiracy? i'm stating facts. ur fuckin nuts. if everything u think i say is a conspiracy theory. what a maroon.
There are many conspiracy theories out there. The official version itself is a conspiracy theory. Osama Bin Laden and 19 hijackers CONSPIRED to attack America. BUT where is the evidence? youtube. com/watch?v=4nX-KQbYXnk
6/10 of the 911 commissioners said they were lied to and there was a coverup. ALL I am saying is that the government lied to us. I don't know everyone involved, but I know some of them.
You are a nutjob if you believe the official story when the commissioners themselves dont!
he was the only one who said anything cause he wasmaybe the only one to stay home that day asshole didnt you listen or you hear what you want to hear most likely everyone died god rest their soul but i would take someone who worked at the wtc word over yours anytime you my friend rkowens4 like to take people words and twist it or inturpret to follow your story but its not about that its about the truth and guys like you cant handle the truth
@vee85 i'm afraid that YOU can't handle the truth. you call us sheeple, but really you're wrapped up in this fairy tale that has manifested itself into truth in your life. in fact, debunking the entire 911 truth movement is very simple: in order for 911 to be an inside job, it would have to be diabolically perfect, meaning that everyone involved would have to be trustworthy enough not to say anything. there would have to be no whistle blowers, no idea of whistle blowers....next comment....
@vee85 it would have to be absolutely air tight. it would need to be on a need to know basis, so that only a few people actually knew what was going on. there could not be any indication of a conspiracy(thermite dripping, bombs exploding with people noticing, any indication that the offical story is not true). nobody would be able to know about it, except a select few people in the government. it would have to be PERFECT........next comment......
@vee85 since the only way the conspiracy could work is if it was perfect and no one knew about it, HOW DO FUCKIN MILLIONS OF PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE CONSPIRACY?! HOW DOES EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA KNOW ABOUT THIS "PERFECT" CONSPIRACY?! THEY DON'T, IT'S IMPOSSIBLE! no one would know about this conspiracy, in fact, there wouldn't be a conspiracy. the fact that people know it is a conspiracy, proves it wasn't a conspiracy. END OF THE 911 TRUTH MOVEMENT BY LOGIC AND REASON
This doesn't debunk anything. If you want to debunk 911 why don't you prove the bin laden fairy tale? The biggest conspiracy theory of them all is the official version of 911.
To this day we have failed to prove any story we were told. Forget wasting time on debunking the "Conspiracy Theorists", WE ARE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORIST BECAUSE WE CANT PROVE ANYTHING. A conspiracy is something you can prove, a conspiracy theory is something you Cant prove and unless you got a confession from Bin Laden in hand, you cant prove that he did it either.
The lies spread by videos like this are abominable...
A Bush Connected CIA Front Company known as SECURACOM ran security at the WTC's pre-9/11, and some of their members were caught selling Put Options on United and American Airlines in the weeks before the attacks making millions off of insider trading.
The answer to your question is: The Truth! It's as obvious as can be that none of those buildings should have fallen into their own footprint. Why was so much left out of the 911 commission's farcial investigation. How much have you been paid? Your voice is really annoying, btw!
i wish he had added the photo and story of the ticket for the top floor viewing area that was from the time it was supposedly powered down. and btw, if the whole building was powered down for an entire weekend, did the IT guy walk up 90 stories to sit in a dark room for 8 hrs then walk back down?
Haha did you ask about the power downs and then show a random picture of the WTC? The guys from LC at least show you the article of lowered security wheres your article or audio proof that Scott stated 36 hrs to 26 hrs? Your right tho theres no way al-Qaeda could of had access to any part of those buildings only the government could and building 7 was all government & Silverstein whose a 911 billionaire If you want to debunk have articles and facts dont just ask us to take your word for it! FAIL
Why the fuck can't any of you 911 debunkers explain why building 7 and the twin towers all fell free fall straight down with nothing left standing!! Anyone with a remote knowledge of building demolitions can see building 7 (Which was not hit by an aircraft) was "Pulled" and if it was pulled on 911 (Like Silverstein stupidly admitted) there had to be explosives in place before the attack because there was no time to plant the explosives on 911. Who put the explosives in building 7?
@Sariel2012 "why building 7 and the twin towers all fell free fall " - They didn't. Please research the topic little. Part of WTC7 had a very short time of virtual free fall.
"straight down with nothing left standing" - It has been explained. People don't want to believe in the mundane they want to believe in all power secret societies. It makes their lives seem more interesting.
"Anyone with a remote knowledge of building demolitions" - Yet all the demo companies disagree with you....
@markh1011 terrific Mark, yea then explain how wt7 came down. Oh yea you believe that all the office furniture and papers added fuel to the fire and caused free fall speed.
@usd25674 "Mark, yea then explain how wt7 came down." - Ah standard truther argument. When it call gets too hard they fall back on - " well yeah!!? explain WTC7 then!!". A report was released on WTC7 a couple of years ago. Try to keep up.
"Oh yea you believe that all the office furniture and papers added fuel to the fire " - Yes. One of the Cardington fire tests was fueled only by office materials and the air temperatures exceeded 1000C well within an hour.
@usd25674 "So ya think some paper and desks brought down the buildings." - I have provided an example of the temperatures they cause. You have chosen to just pretend that example doesn't exist. That is delusion.
"Oh and the 1000 degrees celcius pure fiction" - Look up the test. I know you wont because you think making uneducated claims and ignoring reality to support your conspiracy religion is enough.
@usd25674 "Convert it ti farenheit " - lol thanks I'm aware of the conversion.
"Maybe the NIST will show this , but no one with credibility." -You idiot the fire tests I'm referring to were done in the UK in the 90s... Nothing to do with NIST.
@Sariel2012 "building 7 (Which was not hit by an aircraft" - No it was hit by one of the tallest skyscrapers in the world....
"Like Silverstein stupidly admitted" - One of the most idiotic claims of the truthers (which is saying something) . If you actually read the quote it debunks itself.
"Who put the explosives in building 7? " - The lizardmen NWO? The men in black?
Yes it's true, nobody else has come forward to corroborate Scott Forbes testimony, however in the same manner, nobody has come forward to say that he's flat out wrong. I would think that if he told such an utter bold faced lie, someone would have said THAT DIDN"T HAPPEN. The fact that nobody who worked in the south WTC tower has said anything to corroborate or discredit him leaves me to think that people are afraid to speak up. Why be afraid to discredit someone opposing the government?
RKOwens is very obviously predisposed. He merely tries to discredit his adversaries. He does not answer anything. His description of tower 7 collapsing in its own footprint because of "damage" and "fire" may work for some who know nothing about welding steel supports, but for those of us who do it, his mere "hypothesis" is not plausible. Steel turning to dust in seconds??? That's not research, just absurdity. He posts alleged quotes of witnesses, but like the media, no live interviews.
RKOwens argues like a predisposed young boy. He doesn't present any solid counter-evidence, i.e: was the security system shut down or not? Most competent witnesses are dead. Owns argues like a politician. He doesn't appear to want to examine any evidence, only dispute it. He sounds like a boy who's father, some friend or relative work for the government; whether military or otherwise.
RKOwens argues like a predisposed young boy. He doesn't present any solid counter-evidence, ie: was the security system shut down or not? Most competent witnesses are dead. Owns argues like a politician. He doesn't appear to want to examine any evidence, only dispute it. He sounds like a boy who's father or some friend or relative work for the government; whether military or otherwise.
@swokdirtfarm The videos are disproving it. He does not need to point something out to you wheich is clearly accessible to you on Google. Do some research, the man who made this video sure as hell did, why shouldn't you?
The flash came before impact. It is not naive to gather information. Denying and dismissing evidence to selectively and blindly support the status quo is a sad reality that many people are choosing to do. Video evidence as well as the obvious lack of evidence of the official Pentagon account BECAUSE of government confiscation supports the legitimacy of America's need to conduct REAL research on what happened on 9/11.
Why are there flashes of light just before the plane hits the South Tower? Why is there aluminum oxide? Why can't NIST describe what Fuji Bank had on the 79th to 82nd floors? Fuji employees report large server-size "UPS batteries" being placed on the 81st floor. Why would it be hard to bypass "security"? Government works with a chain of command. Any high level agency could gain access to business floors, don't be naive.
@thisguyoverhere1 Flashes of light: the hull of the plane striking the building. When two rigid bodies collide at high speeds like that, there is always a flash. What did you thnk it was..a freaking missile? Don't be naive.
They don't seem to understand that there was an aircraft flying at 450 knots into the building. You do not need a bomb or a missile. The plane itself is a missile. "Truthers hear what they want to hear." :)
you cant just plant bombs and expect it to collapse, u have to strip the insulation, strip the wiring, strip the walls in order to plant them, any building looks like that when it collapses, and small teams of demolition specialists? it takes months to demo a skyscraper, obviously, u are ignorant of the way things like this work. just like the rest of the 911 conclussion jumpers
What should be the most telling thing of all is that not one newspaper in the entire world believes in the truther theories of 9/11....doesnt that tell you its all B.S. If it was real the french would love to embarass us with it.....but not one media outlet in the world believes in the Trutheres...how do you explain that fact......simple...the Truther theories are wrong and all journalists in the world know it.....
Well answer me this Mr. Debunker Y was this information ignored by the 9/11 commission? Regardless if Scott Forbes said 26 instead hof his original 36. They just totally ignored that there was a power down in the South Tower. I mean if they wanted to ya know come out and clear this up they would, but they're hiding something and you can see that in the Bush Administration
You don't need Scott Forbes....watch the buildings...watch how they fall...explain Bldg 7's demise. A small fire took down a 1.5 million sqft building? Right. Have you seen the aftermath of the hit on the Pentagon? That was the result of a 747 crash? Right.
It was a 1.5 million sq ft building...did you see the manner in which the Bldg 7 fell (imploded)? ....what caused the B7 to fall in this way? I think these are reasonable questions that should be asked. There are enough experts that believe there is more to the story.
@RockBanned 47 floors????? REALLY????? The NYFD admits the fires were contained to maybe 4 or 5 floors. If there was no cover-up involving WTC 7 why was it completely omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report?? RKOwens has not debunked one single aspect.......PERIOD.
You are a moron .. any idiot who uses the same sources to debunk what they are accused of is a fucking moron. That's like asking the person who you think robbed your house, if they robbed your house and then believing them because they said that they didn't. Crack makes you stupid .. so stop smoking it and posting ridiculous videos.
They will not allow an investigation because THEY R GUILTY OF MURDER.
That's why BUSH fought an investigation for 411 days.That's why he would not testify under oath or by himself or his comments released to the public.911 commission was a total fabrication.
i quote one george w. bush."let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of september the 11th" WTF. why, worried people might go, hold on a second. explosives going off on the lower floors after planes hit! the "pull it blunder by silverstein, no plane at pentagon, no plane at shanksville.trillions lost at pentagon, never accounted for! trillions made by who knows who after 9/11. oh, and no fighter jets, really!! sure i like your story GEORGE..
What on earth are you talking about? "No plane at Pentagon" and "No plane at Shanksville." When there is an impact at those speeds the aircraft will mostly disintegrate. There was in fact debris from both aircraft at the sites, just the aircraft itself never survived impact. Take into consideration the angle of impact and the pentagons' design. Watch the Debunking videos, it seems you are trying to aviod them all, once one section of a conspiracy comes down, the rest follow :)
@linkslingo Oh man, those claims have been disproven and explained time and time again so many times! How close minded it is of conspiracy theorists to keep on using these to justify what they were told "happened" by the "trustworthy" truther sites.
it isn't proposterous if they hide the explosives out of sight, dumbass... do you think they'd go through all that trouble only to have left out where to put the explosives? i mean really, after months of planing they just leave the squibs out for everyone to see... DO YOU SEE THE ERROR IN YOUR THINKING HERE? i mean really... who's to say there wasn't maintenance access? out of sight unless you have a security clearance... dude... you're debunkings are about as solid as h2o....
not "a few days". The Elevator "repairs" had been taking place for NINE MONTHS. And yes, the security company changed a few years prior. And on the board of Securacom who had the security prior to that sat... MARVIN BUSH. And then there's the fabulous new owner Larry Silverstein some months prior getting a terrorist insurance for it all for the first time. Oh so many "coincidences". EVERYTHING is a coincidence in this world. NOONE plans ANYTHING. We all just sleepwalk through life.
The recently tested samples of nano-thermite explosives residue recovered from many sites in New York City in the first few days after 9/11 seemed to show that the explosive was upto 6 times more powerful than regular thermite. Thus, fewer floors could be covertly wired, and most work done, during daytime office hours on the many floors vacant of tenants than would be needed for regular thermite. This work might look like regular construction to most office workers in WTC complex.
Wow, we're REAALLY stretching things now. So now, there was a MINIMUM amount of thermite (oh, excuse me NANO thermite) planted, and amidst the dust from millions of pounds of concrete and drywall, they were able to find traces of it from a sample collected off a fence across the river, and from the loft of some lady's apartment nearby. Good Lord, why can't you guys at least TRY and be a LITTLE bit realistic.
Recovering passports and licenses is not an unusual event after a plane crash, considering light weight debris tends to survive and scatter, unlike the blackbox which normally endures a lot of punishment. But in THIS case, it was entombed in thousands of tons of a steel structure, THEN crushed by thousands more, while being incinerated. The fact that it wasn't recovered while a passport was is odd to you, not to me. You think the government needed this passport to seal its case? gimme a break
10/28/2004]A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the data from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites—including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI—says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB. Off the record, we had the boxes, the source says. Youd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.
@oxomaticman - So....instead of looking for the black boxeS (more than one, actually four), they instead shipped as fast as possible all (most) of the debrie over-seas, never to be seen from again? You don't find that fishy? It IS a crime scene... You know what you should do? You should investigate as to where your gov't gets its money. You may have an easier time understanding reasons behind 9/11. It's really something once u realize ur country is being bankrupted, regardless of who's in office
10/28/2004]A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the data from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites—including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI—says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB. Off the record, we had the boxes, the source says. Youd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.
If you watch any videos of the impact, you would see thousands of pieces of paper fly down because of the paper's light weight. A black box would have been wedged in the debris and destroyed during the collapse.
But, in light of the recent scientific discovery of nano-thermite in WTC dust samples taken a day after the crash - NO POWER-DOWN IS NEEDED TO PLANT CONVENTIONAL EXPLOSIVES. It can be done covertly, contained in typical-looking building materials over a long period of time?
Look up military-grade nano-thermite for yourself. Read the peer-reviewed journal article by Neil Harrit and many others who used electron microscopy on items found at ground zero.
There are also reports of suspicious "construction" work and wiring be done on the vacant floors in WTC 1 & 2 in the last days just before 9/11. Some published photos reportedly show dust residue from this "construction" covering wide areas of the interiors of the Towers in those last days just prior to 9/11. Covert placement of nano-thermite could easily be done right under the noses of those two security dogs and office workers from 9/6/01 to 9/10/01.
Now you look here, you INFILTRATING, OBNOXIOUS JACKASS!!! anyone who intends to believe your crap is an IDIOT!!! You "debunkers" are DEBUNKED! There is INFALLIBLE evidence to show that 9/11 was a DAMN COVER-UP!!! P*** OFF, you Bush-lover!!! Bush is guilty (plus, his Cabinet), hes FIRED, and he and Cheney should be ARRESTED!!! ARREST BUSH & CHENEY: WAR CRIMINALS!!!
"Why are there no photos showing the top half without power?" Legitimate question. Why are there no photos of a plane hitting the Pentagon? Legitimate question.
If power was interrupted to an office building, there would be memos and/or emails sent to ALL the tenants.
Office buildings can be in use all weekend long. BUSINESSES DO NOT NECESSARILY SHUT DOWN OVER THE WEEKEND. Businesses need to be able to work someimtes 24/7 on crash projects.
SO the building would have to notify businesses that power would be interrupted over the weekend
And there would be memos about it all over the place
These new debunk vids are just made for the fucking Idiots in America that need a little teddy bear to Hold....my Government isnt out to get me HOLD ME MR TEDDY BEAR..! If anyone puts a drop of stock in these debunk vids they should buy the Fed Governments vacation package to Camp Fema....Try the tanning beds (OVENS )...WAKE UP AMERICA we have been couted..time for debate is over...our children being Vaccinated by poison...and the NWO is stealing our Freedoms every day....JOIN YOUR LOCAL MILITA
Well here we are 8 years and counting and so far NO ONE has been dragged into a court room despite the factthat there is OH SO MUCH evidence 9/11 was an inside job On the other hand the right wing wackos that think obama was born in Kenya have taken whatever evidence they have and filed MULTIPLE lawsuits
Why dont you go get your heros alex jones charlie sheen and jesse ventura to pony up some cash get some lawyers and drag the airlines to court for helping cover up the murdero 3k people?
another lame try...you have no evidence accept his story varied....shit, everyones story changed....the cops at the pentagon who were at the gas station said their car was at a certain pump when they saw the plane, but had to change it because of the video of where their car was....doesnt mean they lied...just mean shit was crazy....Im really starting to like you Bunkers....you cats are crazy
You're nothing more than a fuckwit. You run and hide every time I mention that 9/11 can't be an inside job because of the warrentless wiretapping whistleblower.
None of the NYers that were around the towers that morning said they DID NOT see ANY planes
Not 1 person has said something similiar to the following
"I heard an explosion looked up and watched the 1st tower hit burning I saw the 2nd tower explode but I did not see any plane hit the building I can say without an disqualification I did NOT see any planes hit the towers"
However we do hear are witnesses claiming they heard the low flying plane come in then the impact then the explosion
Why dont YOU give us an A TO Z chronology of everything that led up to 9/11 using the steaming mountais of shit you people call evience of an inside job
Youve had 7 years and counting to extrapolate one but you CANT
You have me confused. I don't believe in inside job. I simply replied to your comment that no planes were used. I thought you were promoting the stupid BS "no planes struck the WTC" theory.
You expect a human being to remember something as mundane as what gas pump they were at when something as "trivial" as a plane slamming into the pentagon happened
I was attacked in a parking garage I remember punching the guy in the jaw then choking him out on the ground but for the life o me cant remember how he got on the ground
Still waiting for some idiot Govt story believer to explain from A to z what really happened on 911 Besides the stupid foolish story about 19 crazy arab video game nerds with box cutters being commanded by a guy named OSAMA from a cave
This coming from a fucking twoofer whack job who after almost eight years still can't come up with a single shred of scientifically verifiable or legally actionable evidence of an inside job.
"since you make the claim that you know what happened it is up to YOU to prove it, and so far you have done a miserable job of it"
FUCK YOU, PROVE YOUR CLAIM that the government was behind the attacks... SHOW ME all your scientifically verifiable or legally actionable evidence of an inside job...... OH RIGHT YOU HAVE NONE.
This has been flagged as spam show
I WOULD LIKE TO SAY MY SON RYAN KYLE OWENS IS PAID TO MAKE THESE VIDEOS AND POST THEM ON YOUTUBE.
HE HELPED US FINANCE OUR NEW HOME WITH MONEY HE WONT TELL ME WHERE IT IS COMING FROM
I AM NOW AWARE OF HIS LIES ON YOUTUBE AND TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR HIS ACTIONS
ANYONE WHO WANTS TO TALK TO ME OR RYAN DIRECTLY CAN CALL ME AT MY HOUSE NUMBER FOR A FORMAL APOLOGY
(423) 913-0562
276 Hartman Rd
Jonesborough, TN 37659-3720
ONCE AGAIN, I AM SORRY FOR HIS DISINFORMATION AND LIES IN THESE VIDEOS
CynthiaOwens 1 week ago
Another great video that gives the fingers to the Taliban supporting Conspiracy Theorists.
Stu3100 3 weeks ago
@RKOwens4 pls, the debunking of the reported "put options" thanks
fresh75 2 months ago
@fresh75
Oh you know, just more people "in on" the conspiracy. What's it up to now? 100,000+. Damn these people are good to keep their mouths shut.
ExposeTheTwooferCult 1 month ago
I've been in the WTC and trust me when I say that you would only have to wire a few floors to make that building come crashing down. Couple that with Boeing jets sitting on the top floors and you could say "bye-bye" to those buildings.
MattFoleyMotivation 3 months ago
@MattFoleyMotivation
what is your occupation? and what was it about the wtc that made you sure it would only need a few floors to be wired.
JoshMufc101 2 months ago
@JoshMufc101 The WTC1&2 had one main center column that essentially held up the building. If you were to wire a fewer of the higher floors only to weaken them, the amount of weight caused by the plane would simply added enough stress to bring it down. No one would even see the people putting in the explosives because all work would have centered around the center columns. This is the flimsiest building I've ever seen.
MattFoleyMotivation 2 months ago
@MattFoleyMotivation
and how would the people in the plane know where to hit? and how come the two planes hit in two different area's?
JoshMufc101 2 months ago
@JoshMufc101 It wouldn't matter where they hit as long as they were on the upper floors and penetrated to the support column, all of which they did very easily. This is the main reason Osama and his cohorts kept after the WTC. Because they knew they would have an excellent chance of doing massive damage versus something like the Empire State Building which would have survived very nicely.
MattFoleyMotivation 2 months ago
@MattFoleyMotivation
the buildings weren't rigged anyway, even if it would only take a few floors which i very much doubt.
JoshMufc101 2 months ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Since WTC 7 was constructed over a Con Ed station, how did the structural framing compensate for the station and how did that influence the collapse?
Since demolition experts estimated it would take 100 men 6 months to place explosives in WTC 1, 2, & 7, how come no one witnessed any strange construction activity, wires, or boxes?
How can Operation Northwoods be an example of "false flag terrorism" if it never happened?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 3 questions debunkers never answer
Why was everyone in on a massive conspiracy to lie about explosions and some explosions were caught on video?
They just all invented spontaneously eh?
What happened to the plane wings at the pentagon?
Why is ctcole such an idiot?
zenoist2 1 month ago
@zenoist2 ur an idiot hahaha
MrLostinLine 1 month ago in playlist More videos from RKOwens4
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago
straw man evidence!!! RKOwens4 is a retard
Scobo11 5 months ago
your doing the same thing as the people your trying to debunk, the evidence tends to push toward the so called 'nut jobs' so why so much effort to debunk them
FerociousLopez 5 months ago
golly gee...thanks a bunch 4 straightening me out on this. you idiot. and we all just fell off the turnip truck. what is amazing is the gov. expects anyone to believe ttheir conspiracy theory. there is no debunking live nanothermite that can be ignited. even years later. there is no debunking molten steel. connect the dots moron. wait!! I found their passports at the crash sites!! You were right all along! How could we have doubted you? why don't you take your crap off already?
jerjr49 6 months ago
I don't know why this video is asking Scott Forbes to verify if the other buildings were powered down. He only worked in one building how the hell should he now what happened in the other buildings. He can only state what he witnessed in his building.
HaphazardCrappola 6 months ago
It's a good thing this video was made or posted in 2007. Because as of right now, two people have claimed there was a power down. Maybe more to come in the future
HaphazardCrappola 6 months ago
You forgot to mention that Sirius (the bomb sniffing dog) was trained only for searching CARS for bombs, and would be ineffective for the explosives set up that took the WTC down. Not only that, he was locked up in his cage also. So what`s the deal with these half truths and half assed explanations?
vme1111 7 months ago
@vme1111 and how would you know that he was caged up?
Colonel10110 7 months ago
@Colonel10110 There you go. And like I said, he was meant for searching for car bombs anyway. So the question stands. What`s with the half-truths and half assed explanations? Good liers are known for telling MOSTLY the truth to grasp you, then mix in some lies that would through the individual, or masses off. RKOwens4 is an example of such a victim. Real research shows a painfully obvious inside job.
vme1111 6 months ago
@Colonel10110 Ok. Fixed that error issue.
vme1111 6 months ago
@vme1111 Theres not much of a difference... Just a bigger area. Wouldn't be ineffective.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan Huh?
vme1111 6 months ago
@vme1111 Nvm... Didn't know that was too much to comprehend.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan You didn`t understand what I wrote did you? Go look at the difference at what Sirius was trained for. No wonder you guys fall for the obvious lie.
vme1111 5 months ago
@vme1111 I completely understood what you said. I'm saying that there's really almost no difference other than being a wider area of searcher. I think your getting confused of what you wrote yourself...
DKaijuGomoMan 5 months ago
The truth hurts twoofers. We all know you will disregard any evidence that doesn't suit your pathetic agenda so it's impossible to convince you otherwise. "Truth Movement" R.I.P.
mikeyt34 8 months ago
@mikeyt34 why is it that so called truthers anger you so much and you hate those who dont agree with you
thevoodooguru 7 months ago
@thevoodooguru It has nothing to do with agreeing with me, I'm not a narcisit.. What it does have to do with is the "twoofers" claims would require thousands of good Americans to be in on the coverup. Ground Zero alone would require thousands because noone reported any steel beams showing signs of being cut or damaged due to explosives, thermite, or "super dooper nano thermite". Shanksville, 1100 investigators and volunteers worked that crime scene, 136 eyewitnesses to plane at pentagon, etc.
mikeyt34 7 months ago
@mikeyt34 alrite good point but i just dont think you should generalize anyone who questions the government or 9/11 as a truther let me ask you this do you think the war on terror was a success when terrorist attacks kill a small percent of people (less than 400 a year in america) and cost us billions that could be used more productively to fight disease or help to recover the economy
thevoodooguru 7 months ago
whoever made this video is a jackass, cant you do it overnight? And after the alert returns to normal doesnt that make it even that much easier, you dont need a blackout to get bombs in douchebag, got 5+ days to do it overnite and the dogs wont smell anything if theyre at their posts and not doing routine sniffs round the building
heatsstyle 8 months ago
aside from explosives, the WIRING for such a demo would be insane!!! That is more likely to be noticed than anything
edcoondog 9 months ago
@edcoondog It wasn't done with detonating cord, it would have left a trail. Think for once. The demolition was done wirelessly.
OperationMockingbird 9 months ago
@OperationMockingbird It's hilarious to see a truther tell someone to "think for once".
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel It's hilarious to see an entrapped or extorted "duhbunker" troll such as yourself deliberately lie to cover up 9/11 spending hours of your precious time forced to "duhbunk" Global Guardian '01. You are a pee on and will be treated as such, troll.
OperationMockingbird 9 months ago
@OperationMockingbird Hours of my precious time huh? It takes about 10 seconds to read and reply to your idiocy.
I wonder if it is some sort of brain damage that makes people think like you do?
IamVendel 9 months ago
@OperationMockingbird WOW, sounds like you were there! How do you know this?
edcoondog 9 months ago
type scott forbes 911 on youtube... there were power downs at the world trade center 2 days before 911 and he used to work at the WTC.... a lot of smoking guns
heightboosting 10 months ago
mossad did it
=nIH50KhpVWg
voodoowichdoctor 11 months ago
ok so debunk the families and the first responders that want the truth moron.
TheyDidThis 11 months ago
I am surprised no one has asked how many tons of explosives it would have taken to take down the building. Truck loads would have had to be brought it. Please tell me how that went unoticed. A plane flying into the side of the building is what took down the buildings. No explosives needed.
MrHamlet 11 months ago
the gov schill proved it best when he said you would have to place explosives on every floor or every second floor to achieve the collapse as witnessed.Y et they want us to believe that the trauma on the few floors that day did cause what was witnessed. every official theory makes us accept contradicting statements proving their theory is flawed.thanks rk owens for giving me that insight ......debunker..Fail
oddjobsunl 1 year ago
RKOwens seriously needs to be awarded the Nobel Prize!!!! Every 9/11 twoofer who just can't accept that those ragheads are responsible for the attacks need to be shipped off to a different planet. Forget Mars, move them to Uranus or further!!!!
Marakulous43 1 year ago
Scott Forbes is someone who worked in the world trade center! I think you better get to know these people before you debunk anything else! And he does not like being called a conspiracy theorist! As a matter of fact the only ones telling the conspiracy theories is you!!
MrELEWEZ 1 year ago
Everyone one of your videos has a truther in your highest rated comments. Looks like you're in the minority and don't know any better. Good to see you haven't posted anything in months. Failure is your only option!
omarlives 1 year ago
@omarlives You can go on a shipping video and see all the idiots giving each other thumbs up. So what does that prove? There are a lot of idiots out there.
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel u may be right that the majority of people are idiots. but that is never the case. the people of a society will never want war. that shows the people know better. majority rules becuz the majority knows better. the benefit of the many always outweighs the benefit of the few. but there are some things about 9/11 thats bogus, but EVERY THING COMING FROM RKOWENS IS THE BEST OF THE BEST WHEN IT COMES TO TROLLING! AND THE WEAKEST OF THE WEAK WHEN IT COMES TO 9/11 DEBUNKING.
omarlives 9 months ago
@omarlives I am always fascinated by people like you. Those who can so easily throw reason and logic out the window. Honestly the mental gymnastics you people go through must be exhausting.
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel blah blah blah the majority are idiots i guess rite? just say that
omarlives 9 months ago
@omarlives The majority of you conspiracy nuts are idiots. The large majority of the people don't believe your garbage.
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel Speak for yourself. I'm not a truther nut who holes up in the woods with camo on, but just going by WTC 7, that's the smoking gun. Smoking gun = something shady happened
JohnLeeMD 4 months ago
@JohnLeeMD So your defense for not being a nut is to spout garbage about building 7?
IamVendel 4 months ago
@IamVendel What garbage? If you thought that a high-rise building could potentially implode in the manner that WTC7 did, would you ever go into a building, hotel, school, hospital of any height? Of course you wouldn't... and you'd be righ. But you know that buildings DON'T fall that way. You know that buildings are much more robust... and that if/when a fire occurs, while you may have to worry about getting burned, you don't worry about the whole building falling down on top of you.
JohnLeeMD 4 months ago
@JohnLeeMD Most people wouldn't go into a building that just had part of another one fall on it and put a massive gash in it's side. And set it on fire.
IamVendel 4 months ago
@IamVendel HAHAHA.... OK, I'll play your game (as if WTC1/2 fell ON top of WTC7). Even if that happened, it still wouldn't cause it to collapse like that. I suppose (in your hypothetical), large pieces might break and fall. And/or you'd see large sections of the building... And if it was sthat substantial, eventually the building would tumble/topple over. But to think that because of a "massive gash", it's going to cause a global collapse JUST LIKE A CONTROLLED situation... that's ridiculous.
JohnLeeMD 4 months ago
Comment removed
JohnLeeMD 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JohnLeeMD If such a random act can cause such a neat, straight-down collapse of a building, let me ask you this: Why even employ hightly scientific (expensive) demoliton companies to implode buildings? If all it takes is to cause a random gash and start various fires, to cause the type of collapse we saw from WTC7, why strategically place charges, cut beams, do all sorts of work? Just blow a massive gash yourself, start some fires, and save a boatload of money.
JohnLeeMD 4 months ago
@JohnLeeMD When you saw it go down you thought it looked "controlled". So you pretty much just latched onto anyone/anything that agreed with you. And so you now come on here and proclaim that things can't have happened by any other means.
Do I have that about right?
IamVendel 4 months ago
isn't the fact that, the majority of ppl do not want war and therefore are not the mass idiots, as u say, not using logic and reason? i'm a mental gymnastic klutz!
omarlives 9 months ago
@omarlives I'm sure that made sense somewhere in your head.
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel Just incase ur really didn't understand what i said: the fact that the majority of ppl within a country do not want war because they know better, therefore, they're not idiots, therefore, u said "there are alot of idiots out there", which is wrong.
omarlives 9 months ago
@omarlives Okay... War=do not want. Brilliant observation. So what does that have to do with anything? Or is this some insane conspiracy theory bullshit?
IamVendel 9 months ago
@IamVendel Huh? u said most ppl are dumb. wrong. most ppl dont want war. isn't that proof to u that most ppl aren't dumb? conspiracy? i'm stating facts. ur fuckin nuts. if everything u think i say is a conspiracy theory. what a maroon.
omarlives 9 months ago
@omarlives Most people don't want to get stabbed in the face. That doesn't have anything to do with their intelligence level.
So again what point are you trying to make?
IamVendel 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There are many conspiracy theories out there. The official version itself is a conspiracy theory. Osama Bin Laden and 19 hijackers CONSPIRED to attack America. BUT where is the evidence? youtube. com/watch?v=4nX-KQbYXnk
6/10 of the 911 commissioners said they were lied to and there was a coverup. ALL I am saying is that the government lied to us. I don't know everyone involved, but I know some of them.
You are a nutjob if you believe the official story when the commissioners themselves dont!
DiabloUniverse 1 year ago
he was the only one who said anything cause he wasmaybe the only one to stay home that day asshole didnt you listen or you hear what you want to hear most likely everyone died god rest their soul but i would take someone who worked at the wtc word over yours anytime you my friend rkowens4 like to take people words and twist it or inturpret to follow your story but its not about that its about the truth and guys like you cant handle the truth
vee85 1 year ago
@vee85 i'm afraid that YOU can't handle the truth. you call us sheeple, but really you're wrapped up in this fairy tale that has manifested itself into truth in your life. in fact, debunking the entire 911 truth movement is very simple: in order for 911 to be an inside job, it would have to be diabolically perfect, meaning that everyone involved would have to be trustworthy enough not to say anything. there would have to be no whistle blowers, no idea of whistle blowers....next comment....
thedumbestshowintown 1 year ago
@vee85 it would have to be absolutely air tight. it would need to be on a need to know basis, so that only a few people actually knew what was going on. there could not be any indication of a conspiracy(thermite dripping, bombs exploding with people noticing, any indication that the offical story is not true). nobody would be able to know about it, except a select few people in the government. it would have to be PERFECT........next comment......
thedumbestshowintown 1 year ago
@vee85 since the only way the conspiracy could work is if it was perfect and no one knew about it, HOW DO FUCKIN MILLIONS OF PEOPLE KNOW ABOUT THE CONSPIRACY?! HOW DOES EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA KNOW ABOUT THIS "PERFECT" CONSPIRACY?! THEY DON'T, IT'S IMPOSSIBLE! no one would know about this conspiracy, in fact, there wouldn't be a conspiracy. the fact that people know it is a conspiracy, proves it wasn't a conspiracy. END OF THE 911 TRUTH MOVEMENT BY LOGIC AND REASON
thedumbestshowintown 1 year ago
@thedumbestshowintown the term conspiracy means a collaboration of two or more people moron.
TheyDidThis 11 months ago
This doesn't debunk anything. If you want to debunk 911 why don't you prove the bin laden fairy tale? The biggest conspiracy theory of them all is the official version of 911.
damienrockaterror 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RKOwens is slick disinformation for people who need to believe all the official lies.
if that's what you're after you've come to the right place.
charles ranalli
albuquerque
cbranalli 1 year ago
To this day we have failed to prove any story we were told. Forget wasting time on debunking the "Conspiracy Theorists", WE ARE ALL CONSPIRACY THEORIST BECAUSE WE CANT PROVE ANYTHING. A conspiracy is something you can prove, a conspiracy theory is something you Cant prove and unless you got a confession from Bin Laden in hand, you cant prove that he did it either.
hortywho4u 1 year ago
another video put out the other day talking about the power down... This by another WTC worker watch?v=bKu3sV4wGD0 Pass it on people
MayabongExperience 1 year ago
@MayabongExperience Well that kinda blows doesn't it RKOwens?
Funny - this government apologist has been strangely silent since the NIST FOIA FILMS have hit the internets.
ayebretwalda 1 year ago
She even sounds like a hypno-therapist. LoL
Baphometr418 1 year ago
The lies spread by videos like this are abominable...
A Bush Connected CIA Front Company known as SECURACOM ran security at the WTC's pre-9/11, and some of their members were caught selling Put Options on United and American Airlines in the weeks before the attacks making millions off of insider trading.
9/11 was an Inside Job and WTC 7 was the key.
Your stupid videos will NEVER cover up the truth!
WarCrime911 1 year ago
The answer to your question is: The Truth! It's as obvious as can be that none of those buildings should have fallen into their own footprint. Why was so much left out of the 911 commission's farcial investigation. How much have you been paid? Your voice is really annoying, btw!
dontbelivewhatyourea 1 year ago
i wish he had added the photo and story of the ticket for the top floor viewing area that was from the time it was supposedly powered down. and btw, if the whole building was powered down for an entire weekend, did the IT guy walk up 90 stories to sit in a dark room for 8 hrs then walk back down?
spcantwell 1 year ago
Haha did you ask about the power downs and then show a random picture of the WTC? The guys from LC at least show you the article of lowered security wheres your article or audio proof that Scott stated 36 hrs to 26 hrs? Your right tho theres no way al-Qaeda could of had access to any part of those buildings only the government could and building 7 was all government & Silverstein whose a 911 billionaire If you want to debunk have articles and facts dont just ask us to take your word for it! FAIL
itztone23 1 year ago
Why the fuck can't any of you 911 debunkers explain why building 7 and the twin towers all fell free fall straight down with nothing left standing!! Anyone with a remote knowledge of building demolitions can see building 7 (Which was not hit by an aircraft) was "Pulled" and if it was pulled on 911 (Like Silverstein stupidly admitted) there had to be explosives in place before the attack because there was no time to plant the explosives on 911. Who put the explosives in building 7?
Sariel2012 1 year ago
@Sariel2012 "why building 7 and the twin towers all fell free fall " - They didn't. Please research the topic little. Part of WTC7 had a very short time of virtual free fall.
"straight down with nothing left standing" - It has been explained. People don't want to believe in the mundane they want to believe in all power secret societies. It makes their lives seem more interesting.
"Anyone with a remote knowledge of building demolitions" - Yet all the demo companies disagree with you....
markh1011 1 year ago
@markh1011 terrific Mark, yea then explain how wt7 came down. Oh yea you believe that all the office furniture and papers added fuel to the fire and caused free fall speed.
usd25674 1 year ago
@usd25674 "Mark, yea then explain how wt7 came down." - Ah standard truther argument. When it call gets too hard they fall back on - " well yeah!!? explain WTC7 then!!". A report was released on WTC7 a couple of years ago. Try to keep up.
"Oh yea you believe that all the office furniture and papers added fuel to the fire " - Yes. One of the Cardington fire tests was fueled only by office materials and the air temperatures exceeded 1000C well within an hour.
markh1011 1 year ago
@markh1011 So ya think some paper and desks brought down the buildings.
Question, have you ever seen a wood burning stove ?
Oh and the 1000 degrees celcius pure fiction. Convert it ti farenheit and you will see how ridicoulous you are.
Maybe the NIST will show this , but no one with credibility.
Our government, the one that brought us this great economy.
usd25674 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@usd25674 "So ya think some paper and desks brought down the buildings." - I have provided an example of the temperatures they cause. You have chosen to just pretend that example doesn't exist. That is delusion.
"Oh and the 1000 degrees celcius pure fiction" - Look up the test. I know you wont because you think making uneducated claims and ignoring reality to support your conspiracy religion is enough.
markh1011 1 year ago
@usd25674 "Convert it ti farenheit " - lol thanks I'm aware of the conversion.
"Maybe the NIST will show this , but no one with credibility." -You idiot the fire tests I'm referring to were done in the UK in the 90s... Nothing to do with NIST.
markh1011 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@markh1011 Go away Mark, don't waste my time. You are obviously of low intelligence, there is no hope for you. Believe what you want to believe.
usd25674 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Sariel2012 "building 7 (Which was not hit by an aircraft" - No it was hit by one of the tallest skyscrapers in the world....
"Like Silverstein stupidly admitted" - One of the most idiotic claims of the truthers (which is saying something) . If you actually read the quote it debunks itself.
"Who put the explosives in building 7? " - The lizardmen NWO? The men in black?
Perhaps there weren't any explosives in WTC7. ?
markh1011 1 year ago
@Sariel2012
did you not see the video's that timed the collapse. It wasn't free fall speeds.
Timmay123456789 1 year ago
You call this debunking?
You call "conspiracy theorists" idiots and nut jobs but so far none of you can counter anything. Just a bunch of dimwitted assholes.
Truth0rDeath 1 year ago
Yes it's true, nobody else has come forward to corroborate Scott Forbes testimony, however in the same manner, nobody has come forward to say that he's flat out wrong. I would think that if he told such an utter bold faced lie, someone would have said THAT DIDN"T HAPPEN. The fact that nobody who worked in the south WTC tower has said anything to corroborate or discredit him leaves me to think that people are afraid to speak up. Why be afraid to discredit someone opposing the government?
MassacreBlast 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Duh'Bunking will shrink your nuts!
NoNORADon911 1 year ago
RKOwens is very obviously predisposed. He merely tries to discredit his adversaries. He does not answer anything. His description of tower 7 collapsing in its own footprint because of "damage" and "fire" may work for some who know nothing about welding steel supports, but for those of us who do it, his mere "hypothesis" is not plausible. Steel turning to dust in seconds??? That's not research, just absurdity. He posts alleged quotes of witnesses, but like the media, no live interviews.
swokdirtfarm 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RKOwens argues like a predisposed young boy. He doesn't present any solid counter-evidence, i.e: was the security system shut down or not? Most competent witnesses are dead. Owns argues like a politician. He doesn't appear to want to examine any evidence, only dispute it. He sounds like a boy who's father, some friend or relative work for the government; whether military or otherwise.
swokdirtfarm 1 year ago
RKOwens argues like a predisposed young boy. He doesn't present any solid counter-evidence, ie: was the security system shut down or not? Most competent witnesses are dead. Owns argues like a politician. He doesn't appear to want to examine any evidence, only dispute it. He sounds like a boy who's father or some friend or relative work for the government; whether military or otherwise.
swokdirtfarm 1 year ago
@swokdirtfarm The videos are disproving it. He does not need to point something out to you wheich is clearly accessible to you on Google. Do some research, the man who made this video sure as hell did, why shouldn't you?
TheEvilAmerican 1 year ago
dogs wouldnt pick up thermate. Iron and aluminum. plus a little sulphur. dogs react to nitrates. unless specifically trained.
NOmeansnoFAN 1 year ago
Perhaps you can us why WTC 7 fell then, when it wasn't hit by any planes.
And no other buildings around the WTC complex fell
Or why Dan Rather initially said on air there was no sign of a plane crash at the Pentagon, yet later changed his story
BTW did you know that much of that building was empty with no tennants.
So it's not too hard to belive that most of it could be loaded with bombs in the unoccupied space and no one would have noticed
brickley2000 1 year ago
The flash came before impact. It is not naive to gather information. Denying and dismissing evidence to selectively and blindly support the status quo is a sad reality that many people are choosing to do. Video evidence as well as the obvious lack of evidence of the official Pentagon account BECAUSE of government confiscation supports the legitimacy of America's need to conduct REAL research on what happened on 9/11.
thisguyoverhere1 1 year ago
Why are there flashes of light just before the plane hits the South Tower? Why is there aluminum oxide? Why can't NIST describe what Fuji Bank had on the 79th to 82nd floors? Fuji employees report large server-size "UPS batteries" being placed on the 81st floor. Why would it be hard to bypass "security"? Government works with a chain of command. Any high level agency could gain access to business floors, don't be naive.
thisguyoverhere1 1 year ago
@thisguyoverhere1 Flashes of light: the hull of the plane striking the building. When two rigid bodies collide at high speeds like that, there is always a flash. What did you thnk it was..a freaking missile? Don't be naive.
RockBanned 1 year ago
They don't seem to understand that there was an aircraft flying at 450 knots into the building. You do not need a bomb or a missile. The plane itself is a missile. "Truthers hear what they want to hear." :)
TheEvilAmerican 1 year ago
thank you rkowens
rigatony019 1 year ago
Another stupid discussion.
Symmetrical free fall collapse: controlled demolition, PERIOD.
controlled demolition: CONSPIRACY.
BUSH-CHENEY OPERATION ALL THE WAY. PERIOD.
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
@LazlosPlane
you cant just plant bombs and expect it to collapse, u have to strip the insulation, strip the wiring, strip the walls in order to plant them, any building looks like that when it collapses, and small teams of demolition specialists? it takes months to demo a skyscraper, obviously, u are ignorant of the way things like this work. just like the rest of the 911 conclussion jumpers
th4Guy77 1 year ago
@th4Guy77
Good points. Too bad they mean ABSOLUTELY NOTHING given the ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
@LazlosPlane what actual evidence? a picture and some videos that were miss interpreted?
th4Guy77 1 year ago
What should be the most telling thing of all is that not one newspaper in the entire world believes in the truther theories of 9/11....doesnt that tell you its all B.S. If it was real the french would love to embarass us with it.....but not one media outlet in the world believes in the Trutheres...how do you explain that fact......simple...the Truther theories are wrong and all journalists in the world know it.....
JPPolachek 1 year ago
Fail.
Sharkie626 1 year ago
@LazlosPlane
check out the videos I DENY YOUR HOLY FOOTAGE
911 TABOO
SEPTEMBER CLUES
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
It was not one power down. There were many.
Over a period of weeks.
More bullshit from your friend at rkowens.
Damn you'll just put any bullshit lie up here than comes to your head, won't you?
LazlosPlane 1 year ago
Well answer me this Mr. Debunker Y was this information ignored by the 9/11 commission? Regardless if Scott Forbes said 26 instead hof his original 36. They just totally ignored that there was a power down in the South Tower. I mean if they wanted to ya know come out and clear this up they would, but they're hiding something and you can see that in the Bush Administration
ChadRB88 1 year ago
@ChadRB88
watch
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
no planes were used
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
You don't need Scott Forbes....watch the buildings...watch how they fall...explain Bldg 7's demise. A small fire took down a 1.5 million sqft building? Right. Have you seen the aftermath of the hit on the Pentagon? That was the result of a 747 crash? Right.
valuecreation75 1 year ago
A small fire? A fire engulfing all 47 floors is small to you? Oh one burning for 7 hours? Yeah..tiny.
RockBanned 1 year ago
It was a 1.5 million sq ft building...did you see the manner in which the Bldg 7 fell (imploded)? ....what caused the B7 to fall in this way? I think these are reasonable questions that should be asked. There are enough experts that believe there is more to the story.
valuecreation75 1 year ago
Engulfing all 47 floors? Really? I don't see it on the films...where did you get this information? Fox News channel? Glen Beck?
valuecreation75 1 year ago
@RockBanned 47 floors????? REALLY????? The NYFD admits the fires were contained to maybe 4 or 5 floors. If there was no cover-up involving WTC 7 why was it completely omitted from the 9/11 Commission Report?? RKOwens has not debunked one single aspect.......PERIOD.
unafraidtruther 1 year ago
You are a moron .. any idiot who uses the same sources to debunk what they are accused of is a fucking moron. That's like asking the person who you think robbed your house, if they robbed your house and then believing them because they said that they didn't. Crack makes you stupid .. so stop smoking it and posting ridiculous videos.
jaekent 1 year ago
This is like Scientology, why dont you lisen to the victims... instead of politics and some guy in a kindergarden..
Why not let the family/friends of the victims get a propper investigation..
Why not let the victims rest in peace and know what they died for... and why.
this sickens me...
theBunnyboy 1 year ago
They will not allow an investigation because THEY R GUILTY OF MURDER.
That's why BUSH fought an investigation for 411 days.That's why he would not testify under oath or by himself or his comments released to the public.911 commission was a total fabrication.
ed11561 1 year ago
i quote one george w. bush."let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of september the 11th" WTF. why, worried people might go, hold on a second. explosives going off on the lower floors after planes hit! the "pull it blunder by silverstein, no plane at pentagon, no plane at shanksville.trillions lost at pentagon, never accounted for! trillions made by who knows who after 9/11. oh, and no fighter jets, really!! sure i like your story GEORGE..
linkslingo 1 year ago 9
What on earth are you talking about? "No plane at Pentagon" and "No plane at Shanksville." When there is an impact at those speeds the aircraft will mostly disintegrate. There was in fact debris from both aircraft at the sites, just the aircraft itself never survived impact. Take into consideration the angle of impact and the pentagons' design. Watch the Debunking videos, it seems you are trying to aviod them all, once one section of a conspiracy comes down, the rest follow :)
TheEvilAmerican 1 year ago
@linkslingo Oh man, those claims have been disproven and explained time and time again so many times! How close minded it is of conspiracy theorists to keep on using these to justify what they were told "happened" by the "trustworthy" truther sites.
MazJax 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you really care about your country please check these out.
Undeniable - 100% Proof of Molten Steel . Temperatures fires cannot produce. @ watch?v=8YaFGSPErKU
911 Connect the Dots is a great 18 min video @ watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE
Nobel Prize Winner's Video on 9/11 @ watch?v=ofXKiXNDDYA
Verifiable Science and Physics - 911 @ watch?v=K2Mor7udxJI&
Thermite Scientifically Confirmed in 911 @ watch?v=Vy1oPmuZZ98&
Click on the Peer Reviewed Primary Article in the description!
DoYouCareAboutTruth 1 year ago
it isn't proposterous if they hide the explosives out of sight, dumbass... do you think they'd go through all that trouble only to have left out where to put the explosives? i mean really, after months of planing they just leave the squibs out for everyone to see... DO YOU SEE THE ERROR IN YOUR THINKING HERE? i mean really... who's to say there wasn't maintenance access? out of sight unless you have a security clearance... dude... you're debunkings are about as solid as h2o....
FURTIVEMOVEMENT 1 year ago
debunking nothing one at a time!!!
log140 1 year ago
not "a few days". The Elevator "repairs" had been taking place for NINE MONTHS. And yes, the security company changed a few years prior. And on the board of Securacom who had the security prior to that sat... MARVIN BUSH. And then there's the fabulous new owner Larry Silverstein some months prior getting a terrorist insurance for it all for the first time. Oh so many "coincidences". EVERYTHING is a coincidence in this world. NOONE plans ANYTHING. We all just sleepwalk through life.
gunthaarz 2 years ago 2
yep thats the style.
Eyewitnesses who dont agree with the official story are morons who need to be debunked or ignored and all delusional nutcases.
Eyewitnesses that do agree with it should be promoted like anything and held up as a shining example of honest sober patriotc citizens.
zenoist2 2 years ago
The recently tested samples of nano-thermite explosives residue recovered from many sites in New York City in the first few days after 9/11 seemed to show that the explosive was upto 6 times more powerful than regular thermite. Thus, fewer floors could be covertly wired, and most work done, during daytime office hours on the many floors vacant of tenants than would be needed for regular thermite. This work might look like regular construction to most office workers in WTC complex.
robilefoxx 2 years ago
Wow, we're REAALLY stretching things now. So now, there was a MINIMUM amount of thermite (oh, excuse me NANO thermite) planted, and amidst the dust from millions of pounds of concrete and drywall, they were able to find traces of it from a sample collected off a fence across the river, and from the loft of some lady's apartment nearby. Good Lord, why can't you guys at least TRY and be a LITTLE bit realistic.
oxomaticman 2 years ago
Comment removed
VD420herpes 1 year ago 10
Recovering passports and licenses is not an unusual event after a plane crash, considering light weight debris tends to survive and scatter, unlike the blackbox which normally endures a lot of punishment. But in THIS case, it was entombed in thousands of tons of a steel structure, THEN crushed by thousands more, while being incinerated. The fact that it wasn't recovered while a passport was is odd to you, not to me. You think the government needed this passport to seal its case? gimme a break
oxomaticman 1 year ago
@oxomaticman black box is designed to survive.
theBunnyboy 1 year ago
10/28/2004]A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the data from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites—including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI—says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB. Off the record, we had the boxes, the source says. Youd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.
ed11561 1 year ago
@oxomaticman - So....instead of looking for the black boxeS (more than one, actually four), they instead shipped as fast as possible all (most) of the debrie over-seas, never to be seen from again? You don't find that fishy? It IS a crime scene... You know what you should do? You should investigate as to where your gov't gets its money. You may have an easier time understanding reasons behind 9/11. It's really something once u realize ur country is being bankrupted, regardless of who's in office
VD420herpes 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10/28/2004]A source at the National Transportation Safety Board, the agency that has the task of deciphering the data from the black boxes retrieved from crash sites—including those that are being handled as crimes and fall under the jurisdiction of the FBI—says the boxes were in fact recovered and were analyzed by the NTSB. Off the record, we had the boxes, the source says. Youd have to get the official word from the FBI as to where they are, but we worked on them here.
ed11561 1 year ago
@VD420herpes
If you watch any videos of the impact, you would see thousands of pieces of paper fly down because of the paper's light weight. A black box would have been wedged in the debris and destroyed during the collapse.
brycab2 1 year ago
Comment removed
VD420herpes 1 year ago
Comment removed
VD420herpes 1 year ago
But, in light of the recent scientific discovery of nano-thermite in WTC dust samples taken a day after the crash - NO POWER-DOWN IS NEEDED TO PLANT CONVENTIONAL EXPLOSIVES. It can be done covertly, contained in typical-looking building materials over a long period of time?
Look up military-grade nano-thermite for yourself. Read the peer-reviewed journal article by Neil Harrit and many others who used electron microscopy on items found at ground zero.
Do your own research.
anima715 2 years ago
@anima715
There are also reports of suspicious "construction" work and wiring be done on the vacant floors in WTC 1 & 2 in the last days just before 9/11. Some published photos reportedly show dust residue from this "construction" covering wide areas of the interiors of the Towers in those last days just prior to 9/11. Covert placement of nano-thermite could easily be done right under the noses of those two security dogs and office workers from 9/6/01 to 9/10/01.
robilefoxx 2 years ago
I like these vids, the are logically sound.
philhunter2005 2 years ago
Marvin Bush was installing cams at wtc. Debuking every video of rkowens one at a time.
UNTC321 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Now you look here, you INFILTRATING, OBNOXIOUS JACKASS!!! anyone who intends to believe your crap is an IDIOT!!! You "debunkers" are DEBUNKED! There is INFALLIBLE evidence to show that 9/11 was a DAMN COVER-UP!!! P*** OFF, you Bush-lover!!! Bush is guilty (plus, his Cabinet), hes FIRED, and he and Cheney should be ARRESTED!!! ARREST BUSH & CHENEY: WAR CRIMINALS!!!
towelkit465 2 years ago
"Why are there no photos showing the top half without power?" Legitimate question. Why are there no photos of a plane hitting the Pentagon? Legitimate question.
niverent 2 years ago
If power was interrupted to an office building, there would be memos and/or emails sent to ALL the tenants.
Office buildings can be in use all weekend long. BUSINESSES DO NOT NECESSARILY SHUT DOWN OVER THE WEEKEND. Businesses need to be able to work someimtes 24/7 on crash projects.
SO the building would have to notify businesses that power would be interrupted over the weekend
And there would be memos about it all over the place
MoseleyJon 2 years ago
Responding to MCHESTER29 down there
5uspended4nimation 2 years ago
These new debunk vids are just made for the fucking Idiots in America that need a little teddy bear to Hold....my Government isnt out to get me HOLD ME MR TEDDY BEAR..! If anyone puts a drop of stock in these debunk vids they should buy the Fed Governments vacation package to Camp Fema....Try the tanning beds (OVENS )...WAKE UP AMERICA we have been couted..time for debate is over...our children being Vaccinated by poison...and the NWO is stealing our Freedoms every day....JOIN YOUR LOCAL MILITA
44774477ric 2 years ago
lmao
New debunk videos? Check the date durrrr!
MrRandomGuy86 2 years ago
Well here we are 8 years and counting and so far NO ONE has been dragged into a court room despite the factthat there is OH SO MUCH evidence 9/11 was an inside job On the other hand the right wing wackos that think obama was born in Kenya have taken whatever evidence they have and filed MULTIPLE lawsuits
Why dont you go get your heros alex jones charlie sheen and jesse ventura to pony up some cash get some lawyers and drag the airlines to court for helping cover up the murdero 3k people?
SWEP2AOTC2002 2 years ago
haha erection
brenan6 2 years ago
Lol i was gonna say the same thing.
poopsyproductions 2 years ago
de-bunking.. No just jibberish. Planting explosives would be timely yes, but doable.
robstuk666 2 years ago
another lame try...you have no evidence accept his story varied....shit, everyones story changed....the cops at the pentagon who were at the gas station said their car was at a certain pump when they saw the plane, but had to change it because of the video of where their car was....doesnt mean they lied...just mean shit was crazy....Im really starting to like you Bunkers....you cats are crazy
ChangeDaChannel 2 years ago
These videos dont 'debunk' anything obviously, they are NOTHING more than RKOs own subjective Opinion and mere speculation, thats about it.
they are entertaining and thought provoking 4 sure, but NOT Fact
LHOs911Lies 2 years ago
You're nothing more than a fuckwit. You run and hide every time I mention that 9/11 can't be an inside job because of the warrentless wiretapping whistleblower.
MrRandomGuy86 2 years ago
FACT
None of the NYers that were around the towers that morning said they DID NOT see ANY planes
Not 1 person has said something similiar to the following
"I heard an explosion looked up and watched the 1st tower hit burning I saw the 2nd tower explode but I did not see any plane hit the building I can say without an disqualification I did NOT see any planes hit the towers"
However we do hear are witnesses claiming they heard the low flying plane come in then the impact then the explosion
hfl2005 2 years ago
Hey you, yeah you.
Go watch my September Clues BS video.
MrRandomGuy86 2 years ago
No thanks you
Yeah you
Why dont YOU give us an A TO Z chronology of everything that led up to 9/11 using the steaming mountais of shit you people call evience of an inside job
Youve had 7 years and counting to extrapolate one but you CANT
hfl2005 2 years ago
You have me confused. I don't believe in inside job. I simply replied to your comment that no planes were used. I thought you were promoting the stupid BS "no planes struck the WTC" theory.
MrRandomGuy86 2 years ago
You expect a human being to remember something as mundane as what gas pump they were at when something as "trivial" as a plane slamming into the pentagon happened
I was attacked in a parking garage I remember punching the guy in the jaw then choking him out on the ground but for the life o me cant remember how he got on the ground
hfl2005 2 years ago
lol...she said erection.
illusionistdave 2 years ago
Still waiting for some idiot toofer to explain from A to Z what really happened
Funny how despite oh soooooo much evidence o an inside job they continue to FAIL at providing one
hfl2005 2 years ago
Still waiting for some idiot Govt story believer to explain from A to z what really happened on 911 Besides the stupid foolish story about 19 crazy arab video game nerds with box cutters being commanded by a guy named OSAMA from a cave
how stupid foolish and ridiculous
LHOwasONtheplane 2 years ago
"how stupid foolish and ridiculous "
This coming from a fucking twoofer whack job who after almost eight years still can't come up with a single shred of scientifically verifiable or legally actionable evidence of an inside job.
greywolf424 2 years ago
You are the ones who claim to have ' the truth' which is the official govt. Fairy Tale.
The Truth movement has questions, and wants Answers. i dont claim to know what happened on 911 because i wasnt given a chance to inspect the evidence.
since you make the claim that you know what happened it is up to YOU to prove it, and so far you have done a miserable job of it
LHOwasONtheplane 2 years ago
"since you make the claim that you know what happened it is up to YOU to prove it, and so far you have done a miserable job of it"
FUCK YOU, PROVE YOUR CLAIM that the government was behind the attacks... SHOW ME all your scientifically verifiable or legally actionable evidence of an inside job...... OH RIGHT YOU HAVE NONE.
greywolf424 2 years ago