World In Conflict: Soviet Assault - Exclusive Aerial Assault Trailer HD

[Izkzmach]

Bill: I'm outside!!...where are you? and where's the roof and my car?

[Dorawood]

home front lol X D

[ixonixas]

1:00 WHAT THE FUUU BOOOM!

[XxXValeriYoXxX]

4 capitalists dislike this video !

[SgtShnackendale]

Regardless of your mentality, regardless of your mindset, regardless of anything you may think, if you knew what a fuel air bomb was and you saw that vapour cloud appear at 0:58 you will shit your pants before you blink.

[Backtracer1]

This game has fucking amazing trailers... !

[bisfobrian]

why was there a big circle cloud before it came into mushroom form

[cody7799]

@bisfobrian

Because it was a Fuel-Air Bomb. That's how they explode. It's sort of an implosion of air to combust the fuel before the explosion.

[dan24567]

@bisfobrian Beacuse the fuel needs to disperse and then the high oxide fuel lights and KABOOM.

[mitrooper]

Too bad this game, or any other game, doesn't look like this trailer.

We have to do it with cheesy crap like the Modern Warfare series.

[Fistofmail]

Hey all you guys who can't get it through your head and think your such great historians and experts in military and politics shut the hell up your Retards this is a fucking __________________GAME________­______________ not reality. and who cares if its not realistic its a game, and its meant for entertainment. Not a proving ground for some one thinking the way they think is better then anther

[Weemancake]

@Fistofmail Actualy its called propaganda.

[jkah61]

@Fistofmail wow... there is actually a logical person commenting. I wish I could vote for this comment more than once :)

[ERIC2cruz]

@jackie901 that was batshit stupid. @everyone I'm sick of motherfuckers trying to show up on people who like communism. If you love democracy so fucking much let us believe in what we want, and go piss off some French faggot or something. I mean they're socialists too and no one gives them shit for it.

[jackie901]

People the games alternate reality of course Russia at the time may not have been able to do this that and the other but if we followed that path then we wouldn't have an interesting game would we? heh heh

[vhhsairsoft]

I'm sorry to say but real fuel air bombs dont detonate like this. The gas cloud dispersal and detonation begins and ends in a matter of milliseconds. Their is no 3 second delay.

[ALSPEHEIR]

@vhhsairsoft Who cares?

[Velocispic]

Why is everyone bitching and arguing about shit that ain't gonna happen in real life anytime soon. Can't we agree that WiC is State of the BadAss Art!? The only arguing I wanna see in WiC gameplay and trailer vids is, "Dom_Home Town is better than Dom_Sea Side". Or, "The Soviets are better than N.A.T.O. in 'Said Map' because they start off uphill" or something like that.

WiC is AWESOME!

[MrWafflesMcWafflesx7]

I hate to rain on this parade, but the game World in Conflict is immensly unrealistic. By 1989 the Soviets did not have the economic or political stability nessacary to carry out a war against the US. Much less a war in Europe and in the US. Also, the Soviet Navy would not have been capable of such a strike on Seattle.

[Paranomasia12]

I think you can safely say that a thermobaric bomb trumps a Mi24 or some Bradleys

[KosacderSchreckliche]

@Stulofty1

"JDAMs" are former unguided bombs like the mk82 provided with a conversion kit that they become gps-guided bombs.

this one here in the video is a "simple" fuel air bomb

[WilliamMarshall01]

Funny how you can find a bunch of idiots in these videos arguing as if they knew anything about politics. Just watch the fucking trailer and shut the fuck up!

[ModelbuildingTANKS]

YAY! Seattle!

[URIZHEY]

Sorry, I dont understand much about military armament, but what was that explosion 0:58? Napalm? Cluster-B? Santa after eat chilli???

[Kolashov]

@URIZHEY

i'd say JDAM?

[URIZHEY]

@Kolashov So, its basically an gravity bomb with somekind of "altitude trigger" on it?

[Kolashov]

@URIZHEY

i'd say it's just a big-ass payload :)

i don't know that much about these things ;)

[TheMrCrazyMTz]

@URIZHEY An FAEB (Fuel Air Bomb) by the looks of it. 

[oXKamilXo]

@URIZHEY

Fuel air bomb

[ikovicu]

epic trailers are epic

[hikushi001]

cool, a fuel air bomb awesome!!!

[Marks1157]

Coool never seen a fuel air bomb except in CnC Generals

[killshot932404rj]

poor friend of bill

[supream53]

that was a big fart

[kurd20010]

fullbom at the end...

Koerd

[theJJowners]

0:58 :O (In love)

[kamjam21xx]

cool i wish they would up the graphics alot alot alot alot and still keep the lowest were they are cuz i want it to look even better

[Chris940807]

Why does a lot of game developers blame the russians these days?

[aa11ff]

@Chris940807 because the red bare is awaken :))) russia is no more peace of cake america hawe a big problem now

[redsoxfan1984]

Awesome. Greatest ever.

[LEZWEL1995]

hey im aussie they did not realse this game on console here wat it like on console

[gingerfrank86]

Sweeto

[pooombaaaa]

Thermobaric bomb or vacuum bomb.. westerns call it Fuel Bomb. Could be ODAB-500 PMV or KAB-500KR-OD-E

[GRUNTGOBOOM]

Awesome. By the way, to the guy below me, the Russians may not have known that they would be hitting their own with that bomb. Accidents happen and friendly fire isn't so friendly after all. But good point with the missiles and the bradleys. It's still epic though.

[pliskin555]

Though I love the video, I notice two flaws. First, unless the people in the Humvee were really important, he wastes two AT-2s on just one Humvee when he's clearly got a Bradley platoon on his scopes (25mm Bushmasters can take down a Hind). Second, the Fuel-Air Bomb came from the Russians, which would have killed their chopper.

Oh well, still loved it. Bye bye Key Arena!

[SS1v3k1]

a bit off topic, but why in video games soviets always attacks first? I mean why not the US?

[pliskin555]

During the Cold War, NATO and the US were always on a defensive posture. USSR and her Warsaw Pact had numerical superiority and were treated as aggressors in Eastern Europe. West Berlin was completely surrounded by this aggressor that would have liked nothing less than to capture the entire city (see Berlin Airlift). Add to this the putting down of rebellions like Hungary in 1956, and its not to too hard to see that the USSR was meaner, and thus more likely to invade someone.

[tHaH4x0r]

or its just something that kept hanging after the cold war, with russia as the agressor and America as the "good guys". i totaly hate that idea

[shurednichso]

Bullshit. Brainwashed bullshit. The West did inavde the Soviets since the start. They attacked every socialistic country with brute force,if they could.

You sir, are a brainwashed liar.

[theJJowners]

We are a socialistic country

[shurednichso]

@theJJowners

You are not a country full of ignorant dumbfucks. Worthless shit of the planet.

"We are a socialistic country".. Oh yes, like you would know what that is,Amifag.

[FilipH86]

"beeing meaner and an agressor" don't make me mention all the countries where you have installed tyrants and either supported or commited mass murder.

Like using agent orange in Vietnam or helping Saddam or the Taliban to power

your more liklely to invade someone because you did it all the time and still doing it.

And as for rebellion not quite a rebellion but what about hosing down blacks or when your soldiers murderd those protesters at a school.

[humanentropy]

because the soviets dont make the video games.

[NecroPhoenix]

@humanentropy of course they do.

TETRIS.

[Yosemited]

@humanentropy

YEAH THE SOVIETS DO THE ASS KICK

[Shmalexru]

@humanentropy Russian can kill you? Now, in the new world

[BraUnY74]

@humanentropy TETRIS, dude! F***ing Tetris was made at the USSR.

And the Soveit Assault had to much more be better... why? Cause the Evil side always much more funnier, than the Good one.

[felipefritschf]

Good point. The campaing should be like Command & Conquer. If you play with the Soviets, then the Soviets would win. Same with the US.

[benblij]

thats one super soviet weapon

[Elinvar]

It was American, it was a MOAB

[strongmann99]

No your wrong it was a Russian bomb. Interesting fact; the bomb dropped was a Russian FAEB(Fuel Air Explosive). This game is set in 1989, the US didn't eve nhave MOABS until 2003 or some where along that time. Back then we had the Daisy Cutter.

[msjconnolly]

GO RUSSIA, a land animal

[M1A1HeavyTank]

Bill get out here you gotta see this oh sh@# bill stay inside the house

[poltergheist13]

i guess the Soviets did that 'cuz they had enough of iCarly ;D great vid btw ;)

[redsoxfan1984]

Aren't we all tired of her?

[XxAirborn3xX]

You talking to me bro?????

[XxAirborn3xX]

Holy Crap. That Base on my System freakin went nuts lol. Great Video xD

Rate 5/5 xD

[kansastwista]

the embargo wouldn't have starved japan of anything but oil and the necessities of fighting a war. under the embargo all of japans massive war machine, built up at so much expense, would be like toys with broken springs. with no oil to power them japans empire building would be over and they would have lost their overseas empire(manchuria). that was the choice they had to make. attack and grab enough resources to maintain empire, or pack it in. japan was an aggressor nation long b4 pearl harbor.

[GenericAmerican1]

bill come out here, you gotta see this.......oh sh#@ bill stay inside!!!

[cheesehero234]

@fpsblwiner we never wanted to go to war in WWII but Japan bomb us at pearl habor and so we declared war in them and then ferman declared war on us, we just dudnt decide to go to war because we didnt want to do another world war

[dgabbless]

@cheesehero234 america gave japan very little choice. a full trade embargo on them meant they either had to declare war on america or the whole country would starve

[JGD714]

@dgabbless.

What you writted is completly ilogical, the US only made a full trade embargo after Japan bombed the US, before the Pearl Harbor attack the US didn't had any trade embargo on Japan.

[dgabbless]

after the amount of grammatical and spelling errors in your post, im inclined to ingore it on the grounds that you are an idiot.

[JGD714]

Maybe I have a huge amount of grammatical and spelling errors because english isn't my base language, but at least I can leave in peace knowing that you just ignored my post because you know Im right and you are wrong.

[dgabbless]

okay fair point on the english isnt your first language grounds, but then the second part of your post ruined it and i now still think you are an idiot. lol.

[JGD714]

You cant decide what ruins a comentary, after all, you are just a guy who doesnt know about the Pacific War history, its OK, you can think Im an idiot, that wont change the fact that Im the one who is right.

[dgabbless]

its comments like that that pin you as an idiot

[JGD714]

Its your answers like that that tells me you are just a closed-mind guy that just calls idiot to whoever knows something you dont.

[dgabbless]

how did that post tell you that? my post detailed that something in the content of your post made you look like - in my eyes - an idiot. specifically by just repeatedly saying in effect "im right, you're wrong". i mean thats basically all i get out of your last three posts

[JGD714]

Exactly the same that I do.

[bh3ader]

glad im didnt get rick rolled

[CIWS8227]

Bill you've gota come see this... Rofl

[killshot932404rj]

too bad for bill's friend (and all those soldiers) the Russians went overkill with that Fuel Air Bomb.

PS: can anyone please tell me how to solve WiC render error, it shows all roads as red lines on the map, ANNOYING!

[Nekrasov91]

Excellent videoclip, the best game! This game possesses not only an excellent drawing and fascinating game process, but also a plot, in general idea of game is very interesting and even is useful to many people living in America...

[ToniMontana4000]

poor bill

[Fantasyteentitan]

That's one spicy meatball! :o

[bigd524]

Now thats a big bang.

[xXTeHunteRXx]

FUEL AIR BOMB FTW :D

[FilipH86]

LIES LIES LIES, those statistics you just pulled out of your ass,

It's common knowledge that 80% of the german casualties were on the east front

I tired to put a link to it earlier but youtube won't let me to prevent spam, so just search for it there are several articles saying that it was 80% not 50

[30876825]

80% was at the beginning of war.

After the Downfall of the Atlantikwall was it not more 80%!!!

You can not compare statistics, in 1942 was still up to date - 1944 it is no longer

^^

[monsterkill8881]

@FilipH86 i think 80% is a little too high but i do agree that most of the german casualties were on the eastern front since the fighting there was way more vicious.

[fpsbIwinrar]

So the British, French and other allies who were fighting for 2 years before the americans got there sorry arses and decided to come help contributed that little did they.

[30876825]

But the U.S. has already delivered weapons and vehicles to the Allies - and not just few.

Without the Deliveries the numbers would be:

20% USA - 40% Russia - 40% Allies

For what the U.S. has already done?

Atom bomb,

Bonbardierung on Germany,

yes the D-Day, but that was not a skill but pure battle of material - shown by the heavy losses Without the big U.S. industry would be the United States only a fart...

[30876825]

In WWII Europe - even with U.S. support - would have no chance. Would not many tactical mistakes of the Germans has been made.

For example, the armor technology in Russia. When the Russian tanks easily destroyed the much stronger German tanks, especially, this was the fault of the Germans to thank. The mistake here: The tanks were not on a strong winter converted.

[30876825]

The Russians preferred the downfall, not the war.

The U.S. is trying to spread the opinion that the Russians were the bad guys. - lol, ridiculous. -

Than @AHighPwner:

Yes they asked, but much earlier and at that time, the U.S. has rejected.

Only later, when the balance of power were clear, the U.S. joined the war.

In the 2nd World War the same again:

Remain neutral until the balance of power is clear.

[Joker3797]

Well that and we were attacked by japan, then had war declared on us by Germany on Dec. 11, 1941. Germany was in no way losing the war in 1941.

[30876825]

lol. US-Radars saw the Planes minutes before the assault. It was enough time to deploy interceptors and FLAK.

Ask one survivor of Pearl - they all will say, that Pearl was a very suspicious situation.

They was losing. They allowed a later Invasion, the D-Day, because Hitler was stupid enough to destroy civilian targets, rather than destroy the RAF.

Otherwise Germany could even launch an invasion of England.

[Joker3797]

Not in 1941.  By 1943 it was all over. Germany had no way of winning.

[iComment17]

awesome trailer concept

[boxpenguin]

FAE's are actually very simple. there is a large quantity of fuel which is somehow dispersed throughout a large volume. after a short delay (to allow the fuel to mix in to a proper fuel/air ratio) an ignition explosive is detonated which then detonates the large fuel/air mixed volume. the explosion of the fuel/air volume itself does not do a great deal of damage- the real damage comes from the tremendous overpressure generated by the FAE detonation. also there is tremendous vacuum generated aftr

[Zerosupersayan]

u mean like a fuel air bomb.

[boxpenguin]

war is neither awesome nor bad. it is simply necessary. and honestly war drives industry and technology far more than any other force on earth. people who claim someone "has no idea what real war is" is just as sad and pitiable as the person he is trying to chastise.

[TehUberTrekkie]

Unfortunately, though, war causes death. I think it's better to keep people alive than to drive industry and technology. Industry and technology will advance without needless deaths. Yes, it may advance more slowly, but should people die for simpler life, when life is already simple enough?

[ohwnosrepeht]

The idea that 'war is necessary' is a myth perpetuated by the huge military industries that thrive and live off the 'morality' of 'forward defence'.

War does 'drive' industry and technology, but only for a short period. Most of the early scientific research we now base our society and technology on were all discovered in 'peacetime' - although a grandiose generalisation in itself.

And as TehUberTrekkie hints, do we really need to drive industry and technology harder, faster, better, stronger?

[FilipH86]

you are so wrong american war is not necessary you warmongerer, Sweden has not been to war for 200 years how and it is a industrialised nations where many inventions and companies come from.

Fuck your mass murdering, genocidal nazi country

[Joker3797]

Whoa, I would not call the US Nazi, but we definitly have problems with our country. I am an American and I dont like the direction the US is going. I can see why people from other countries would have a negative opinion about the US. The war in Iraq was not handled right. I really do not even know why our troops are over there.

[FilipH86]

ok, ok I take back the nazi thing, but not just iraq that the US have done mass murder, Guatemala, Nicuragua, El, Salvador, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, installed the Taliban, Pinochet and Saddam, I could go on for ever with this, so yes you are right the US goverment is constantly starting wars and supporting mass murder and tyrants and dictators all over the world

[ICanBeRetarded]

So... We gotta have war just to drive industry and technology? God bless you...

[degaboss]

whatever, war isnt necessary, but U.S. need war, cause without it they wouldnt be what they are now :)

[AHighPwner]

umm thats bullshit becuase its he world that asks for our help and freaks out weather we give it to them or not... WW1 without us, Eruope would fall to Germany, same with WWII. and we still get shit from people telling us how wrong we did everything. but guess what? we tried to stay out of both wars cause we diddnt want to be apart of it, but the world bitchhed and moaned and here we are. we earned everything we have becuase we worked for it. were not war hungry

[degaboss]

suck it man, you dont know anything about your country, please do me a favor and google this word, zeitgeist, go watch both documentaries it will inform you a lot about many things so everybody google that word.ok bye bye

[ShamishMcMurphJono]

actually we ( britain, france) were winning in WW1 without your help, and only about a year before the end of the war, just as Germany was breaking up and revolting against the kaiser, were you guys joining in the war against them. You waited throughout the war and then picked the winning side :P

[5jake55555]

i just want to say this, even though this is a sick ass game, it would be so, i cant even describe the sadness of billions of people being killed, war sucks, but i cant stand fanboy war lovers who dont even know what real war is.

[redsoxfan1984]

Why are people downing this comment. It's awersome.

[MCBlackhawK6669]

that explosion was so cool

[NathanielSolis]

so in short there were three point of views: from the chopper, from the soldier, and from phil right?

[vantechworld]

yes basically

very creative trailer in my opinion

[5rhg]

poor phil...

[kashga11]

this may sound stupid, but what caused the explosion at the end?

[harhan321]

A thermobaric bomb, also called fuel-air explosive (FAE)

[kashga11]

thanks :D

[5jake55555]

hey, i have a question for the FAE, does it basiciallly explode the nitrogen in the air?

[Nallright]

Why is it, that in this video helicopters don't shoot explosive rounds and in the game they don't?

[MasterM0K]

It's called Balance > Realism.

[RINIETHEBEST]

this game is my fav RTS.I like how soldiers,tanks and helis when together move at same speed.

[Nallright]

soldier AI could be improved more though

[RINIETHEBEST]

Yes agree,they don't want to shoot at your armored units,even if they have ant-tank soldiers :S

[hitthedeckstudios]

Ya but don't you hate arty noobs -_-

[XkienzleX]

Holy shit, I live in Seattle. That last shot really freaked me out, seeing my city get blasted like that!

[cscochet]

fuel air bomb CooL BoMb

[Eastbirch]

Red Storm Rising was written by Tom Clancy and Larry Bond. Bon wrote the story to World in Conflict

[nyipnyop]

1:00 what the hell is that explosion??? Fuel air bomb

[KeyGen32]

yes

[Strauss234]

1:02 you can hear guy's breath

[redsoxfan1984]

OMG you can!

[Paranomasia12]

These game is like EndWar.

[strongmann99]

I have played END WAR, this game looks better. But the concept is the same.

[Paranomasia12]

Well, I have played EndWar too, and I have to say the camera is the only difference.

[Nallright]

Yeah End War is a copy of World in Conflict, except for the fact that End War is set in the future...oh and WiC is better =P

[vipervet18]

thats like saying call of duty copied medal of honor XD hahahaha but yeah it is true

[redsoxfan1984]

No, EndWar is like WiC.

[9K58]

gasdfw5, this was just an exmaple from land forces.

I can give similar, and in case of artillery, much stronger, examples in other branches, like anti-aircraft missiles, self-propelled artillery, anti-ship missiles, tank protection, etc...

I will explain everything if you want.

with links from western sources, so that it is not blamed as soviet propaganda.

I will tell you more. Many of them are US government sources.

You know the site "US military combined arms research". Superb website.

[Steelers022]

its a fucking game dipshit and the abrams would stand a chance against their armor

[9K58]

really? especially with it's 105 mm rifled gun back then, it would not.

read about Jane's article made in 1997, about test of russian heavy reactive armor.

Yes, it is the game, and the game is very good I have to say, although greatly simplified, but still, worth playing.

[9K58]

US estimates + information that became avaliable after downfall of USSR + american tests of soviet built (not export monkey models) equipment.

After you do research on those, you will realize that US on it's own stood no chance. All NATO was a different story.

Example: US Abrams uses variant of British Chobham; 105 mm calibre RPG-29 penetrated Chally 2 with newer dorchester armor FRONTALLY. Soviet tanks use 125 mm guns => would have warheads better than rpg-29 =>would easier destroy US tanks.

[9K58]

why are people even arguing whether soviets would capture europe in conventional conflict?

IT clearer than day to US military now that they would, especially considering that americans found out (the good way) that soviets had far superior land forces, especially technology (tanks, artillery etc..)

[migkillertwo]

I was awestruck when I learned that all of that was the same battle

[5StarAce]

In all words,that god has ever made there is only one word that is sutalbe for this...WOW !!!!!!

[brutal6agani]

OH MY FUCKING GOD FUEL AIR BOMB ROCKS!

[MrTesticles93]

1:00 HOLY FUCK Fuel Air Bombs Rock

[Nicolovetigertank]

I WANT THIS GAME! XD

[aldrickbarber35]

I NEED THIS GAME!!!!!

[Paranomasia12]

Good game. I like taking command of the Soviet Army and painting the free world red.

[brutal6agani]

lol u got that right espeically bombing the statue of liberty.

[visdom0]

i got both of the games....never get tired of the campaigns,,,so many different ways to win-.-

[SA341Gazelle]

Ya, and another nice thin is that its not like other games where all you do is defennd and attack..... you usually retreat or go on to help open the way for your freinds.

[haifad]

Fuel Air bomb same bomb as the father of all bombs, but a heck lot bigger, can imagine what kind of destruction it can bring :(

[RedArmyMen]

ODAB(Obyomno-Detoniruyushaya Avia Bomba) at the end was super :D

[chaosyda]

but the 3 scene is the same scene the view from the Hind Boom the humvee and Bradler tank boom and after the citizien with is camera Boom XD

[chaosyda]

1:00 damn someone fart at the Shop >:( XD

[56KbModem]

THIS TRAILER FUCKING OWNS.

[Paranomasia12]

I have just bought and played the game (in the UK) and the Soviet campaign is interwovern with the American campaign. You play as the Russians in Seattle. Its amazing!

[Zays12]

lol fucking cool ending

[j4ckhe]

my god that was awesome

[soviet3321]

cool!!!!

[NoxNoctisUmbra]

This is a nice trailer!

But I do not get it.. is it same war as first game just in Russian point of view? Because then I know how it ends..

Or is it 2nd assault by the Russians?

[hhhhhhyy]

The same.

[NoxNoctisUmbra]

Oh that sucks. I was hoping Russians would strike back and WIN!

Of course USA always have to win..

I don't get it in game Russia cnqure europe and most USA, then somehow US managed to strike back and win.. my ass. stupid story, but game is freaking awesome tho :)

[kiriakufromcyprus]

The game doesn't reveal who won, it just shows the US repelling the Soviet invasion of America. The Soviets could have conquered Paris while the Americans were occupied with the invasion in Seattle. I think the Soviet should have invaded the Persian Gulf and destroyed the West's supply of oil if they wanted to win the war. In Red Storm Rising that was their plan.

[kiriakufromcyprus]

I'm talking about the first one.

[akfuttyseben]

In Soviet Assault it's revealed the soviets lose

[SpunkLance]

Wrong- They only lose the assault on American soil. They're winning in Europe.

[nyipnyop]

Oh i see. I thought in the 1st WiC they lost all of the grounds

[Steelers022]

The Americans never withdrew its 2 divisions from europe so the soviets cant take it