I can totally tell because the female body tends to walk straight instead of bending the knees and it makes her look like she is walking forward and backwards. Now on the other hand the male it makes it look like it's going towards you because the knees are bend. When the knees are bend it points to a direction. When it's not it points to both directions. Its also the movement, females use their hips to move more then males. While the male model uses more movement on their legs.
It all has to do with emotional and your mind, maybe the things you have been through make you think of either coming or going. Like if someone suffered from abandonment from a the dad, as a child, they would see the man going away and vice versa as for the woman. And not just abandonment but other things people go through day by day
At first they all looked like they were walking towards me but i looked at it long enough and for the men i focused on the shoulder area and i finally saw them walking away. took a while though.
I see the woman walking towards because her arms are bent and facing outwards, as you would typically see from someone walking away from you. I saw the man as walking towards because his arms were straight.
the thing is, if you sceth a cub with all lines, ask any amount of people and the will say differently what axis is the cub paralel with!!! its an ilusanary trick.
but on the male the knees are moved outwards during his strides, if he was walking away surely that means that the knees would actually be moving further away than we perceive them to be. hard to explain in a short comment, but ive seen these illusions before... maybe its just me.
i can see the woman walking both ways though. i just cant see the male walking away. the knees still bother me.
I see both walking towards me. This reminds me of that black & white animation of a rotating woman which sometimes can be seen rotating clockwise and other times counterclockwise.
i feel random in this debate over the walking movement of men and women. the walking movement of men is Stereotypically all manly and muscular and Stereotypically for women is the up an down movement of the hips, foot in front of the other and the small steps
It can be thing of habits. Why we use topleft enlightened outsets (e.g. Post Comment button) and rightbottom shaded insets (e.g. Comment on this video textfield)? Isn't solution of this question more linguistic, than evolutionary (if we suppose that [in/out]set unification is of same area as text writing direction etc.)
What i mean is that "couch potatoes" tend to accept that what the media potrays as universally true... case in point, these people will react to the slender image of the woman and immediately associate the posterior to the swaying hips, others may not catch on as so, and associate the anterior to the same... in the second case, of course, the 3 closely packed dots cannot be associated with the posterior, is it not?... this is my insight.
Let me just rant on this... notice the midddle 3 dots of the simulation (the ones that denote the hip)... notice that in case of the "woman", these sway more than the same, in the other 2 cases... in my opinion, this would immediately direct the attention of the viewer to the swinging of the hips, rather than the swinging of the arms in the other cases. The greatest factor involved is what i like to call "media conditioning".
Useful for figuring out what portion of the human brain is responsible for these kinds of perceptions. See "When the brain flips" as in the Necker Cube.
Pretty sure the illusion is about perception not guessing. I immediately perceive both forms to be walking towards the point of perception. It wasn't a "guess" I conscsiously made, though my brain might have.
viruses are a different class of life, funding under the current bush admin has really limited the ability to find such cures, though they may be possible. They will also take buckets of money, genetic engineering isnt cheap. And go fuck yourself and your "just a theory" bullshit. Next time you get an infection, be sure to ask for a 1950's dose of penicillin, because evolved antibiotic resistance is "just part of an unproven theory". asshat.
Words can not explain how weak headed you must be writing such a bullshit. You gotta be one of those guys sitting in front of their TV and blaming anyone else for their very own misery. Science never claimed to be the remedy of all problems. It is rather the search for knowledge (you know what that is, right?) for which a theory is necessary in the first place.
You do realize that every scientific breakthrough starts with a theory/hypothesis, right? They have to ask "what if?" before they jump into the work. Maybe you should look into the scientific process a little more before you go around showing everyone how ignorant you are.
I know a young lady who walks just like the gender neutral model, and she is probably the most beautiful woman I have ever met. I wonder if there is something in that?
most may not see this as a very productive or progressive research topic, but actually this can tell us alot about how our brains and the brains of other animals develop the ability to percieve 3 dimensions. this could lead to new technology for the visually impaired
Yeah I concur; we should be focusing on power, cures, engineering, and other necessities before we worry about the evolutionary development of a brain's interpretation of the movement of the two genders, which would only help us make better models of human brain interpretations of the movement of the two genders...
A lot more research to specify what it means is required. Men coming towards them might mean an evolutionary belief in bringing help as in our distant past, wild creatures posed a great threat. Women may run away for safety while men run to you for help. A modern cultural overtone might suggest the approach as ominous--but this is only the lipstick that culture seems to have drawn upon men. Population density lower early in evol. Humans do not focus on joints but extremities and facial feature.
At First I couldn't tell if the "Female" Model was walking towards, or Away. but After watching it 3 Times I felt more comfortable with Away, and the "Male" Model I felt was coming Towards me. As for the third. Idk :D
I think it's where you look on the character. If you look at the chest part, then it looks like they're walking away for all of them. If you look at the abdomen or waist, it looks like they're walking to you, kind of... I don't think it's really going to work but it works for me for some reason.
when i think of swaying hips, i think of a woman walking away from me. when i think of lumbering walk, i think of a man walking toward me. no cues = coin toss
Alright, I love the scientific method and all but...
IT'S A FUCKING STICK MODEL
When looking at a REAL PERSON, 100% see the man and woman walking towards them!!!
So, the data from the model shows some weird patterns... BUT THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANY FUCKING EVOLUTIONARY OR REAL SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE ITS A FUCKING STICK MODEL!!!
Not sure why there has to be an "evolutionary explanation" for this, as opposed to just a simple "explanation." There are all sorts of visual tricks the brains of some have difficulty interpreting.
I have no problem with "evolutionary explanations," I just think sometimes researchers tend to overuse the phrase for effect, making broad, sweeping pronouncements that aren't always backed up by the evidence presented.
Evolution does a very good job of explaining a lot of things.. Especially physiology and psychology. And that is exactly why researchers use it a lot.
It isn't a pronouncement, but a hypothesis, that there "might be an evolutionary reason" for it. Hypotheses aren't meant to be backed up by the evidence because they are an initial guess. I'm sure that the next thing they'll do is figure out a way to test that hypothesis.
How about we focus on more than one thing? don't you feel we have room for studies like this? Believe me, the issues you are talking about are being studied endlessly (which is, ofcourse, a good thing)...
The explanation could be as simple as: those groups who let (or made) their women walk in front of them into ambushes and hungry lions were more likely to survive. And paying attention and trying to identify approaching masculine (possibly aggressive) individuals might be a good idea in terms of survival, too.
I agree, the knees sticking out give an impression of approach. The elbows sticking out give an impression of walking away and the kneews seem dominant.
All towards me! ... and my theory is there is no relation whatsoever with evolution, it's like a stupid cube drawn in perspective, you can always interpret it in 2 positions.
If you think they are going then your are gonna see them going. If you think they are coming then you are gonna see them coming.
It's just a matter of perspective, because all three models are ambiguous in terms of what is the direction of their movement, so our brain may resolve the ambiguity on either of both ways.
am i paranoid if i see them all coming at me?
kenny8331 3 months ago
I always know when your mom is coming. Her toes curl, some short rapid breaths, a moan, etc....
godhelpusall1 4 months ago 2
So...Women leave more often? ;~;
Thebarespot 6 months ago
I can see it both ways
Nekrofylth 6 months ago
They were all walking away, Neat optical illusion!
RudeAwakning 1 year ago
I didnt see any of them walking away...
I saw them both walking towards me...
Perhaps i am being paranoid? lol
thundergod2008 1 year ago
Till dad know when mom comes...
Sorry...
Acrimonator 1 year ago
My mother walks like a gorilla, not all that fancy with the cat walk style.
DanteSlayer1501 1 year ago
I perceived the exact opposite.. :/
mihtnick 2 years ago
a woman walking towards us is not threatening.
dougtubing2 2 years ago
and one walking away better not be for long or the man walking forward will smack her
Gearz86 2 years ago
When you look at the elbows, you think he's going away, when you look at the knee's you think he's coming
Misterfoxione 2 years ago
I counted 15... did I win?
naa, just kidding, slightly interesting study.
helipassion 2 years ago
this is perception caused by the moment we focus our eye first, nothing evolutionary about this.
models move BOTH ways same time, becouse they are 2d no texture representations of 3d.
same can be done with rotating cube, and any rotating object. you can even force yourself to 'turn' your perception back and forth.
logoth80 2 years ago
I saw all of them walking forward. Oh well ^^
pablovirus 3 years ago 10
i see them both as walking towards
IcarusFlying 3 years ago 4
I can totally tell because the female body tends to walk straight instead of bending the knees and it makes her look like she is walking forward and backwards. Now on the other hand the male it makes it look like it's going towards you because the knees are bend. When the knees are bend it points to a direction. When it's not it points to both directions. Its also the movement, females use their hips to move more then males. While the male model uses more movement on their legs.
velvet123 3 years ago 3
excellent percepetion my friend =)
kr0wn3d 3 years ago 2
Thank you =)
velvet123 3 years ago 2
I am a evolutionists, however I doubt this caused by evolution.
girlsNEVERfart 3 years ago
i saw them all coming towards and i can see them going away too
Taikina 3 years ago
It all has to do with emotional and your mind, maybe the things you have been through make you think of either coming or going. Like if someone suffered from abandonment from a the dad, as a child, they would see the man going away and vice versa as for the woman. And not just abandonment but other things people go through day by day
ddrummer2000 3 years ago
At first they all looked like they were walking towards me but i looked at it long enough and for the men i focused on the shoulder area and i finally saw them walking away. took a while though.
m0osey 3 years ago
I see them both walking away, I think the male is exactly the same as the female just bulkier.
MichaelSwg 3 years ago
I see the woman walking towards because her arms are bent and facing outwards, as you would typically see from someone walking away from you. I saw the man as walking towards because his arms were straight.
xWeaponOfChoicex 3 years ago
the thing is, if you sceth a cub with all lines, ask any amount of people and the will say differently what axis is the cub paralel with!!! its an ilusanary trick.
panzarw 3 years ago
i see them all walking towards
DarkReaperSL 3 years ago
but on the male the knees are moved outwards during his strides, if he was walking away surely that means that the knees would actually be moving further away than we perceive them to be. hard to explain in a short comment, but ive seen these illusions before... maybe its just me.
i can see the woman walking both ways though. i just cant see the male walking away. the knees still bother me.
protege116 3 years ago
I see them all walking towards me. What could this mean?
Dannan1989 3 years ago
u must be retarded then lol
ardaatalay10 3 years ago
I see both walking towards me. This reminds me of that black & white animation of a rotating woman which sometimes can be seen rotating clockwise and other times counterclockwise.
talisare 3 years ago
i see all of them walking in both directions if you take a closer look
Elitefrr 3 years ago
Might the position of the elbow have something more to do with approach perception? Take note how the arm stance matters in behavior patterning.
viewnet1 3 years ago
i see them all walking away......
ilovemygoldfish 3 years ago
little more depth please?
cavemanboborj 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Searching for freshest progressive tracks?
Copy-paste this to download finest tracks.
ravysiki*tk
bykijyko 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Seeking for latest techno tracks?
Go to this website to download greatest tracks.
acutulem*tk
mocozajod 3 years ago
I think all of you seem much more capable of connecting the dots SOOO much better than kids. You should all get a cookie!
clarissa6002 3 years ago
i feel random in this debate over the walking movement of men and women. the walking movement of men is Stereotypically all manly and muscular and Stereotypically for women is the up an down movement of the hips, foot in front of the other and the small steps
uexp4 3 years ago
It can be thing of habits. Why we use topleft enlightened outsets (e.g. Post Comment button) and rightbottom shaded insets (e.g. Comment on this video textfield)? Isn't solution of this question more linguistic, than evolutionary (if we suppose that [in/out]set unification is of same area as text writing direction etc.)
konikula 3 years ago
What i mean is that "couch potatoes" tend to accept that what the media potrays as universally true... case in point, these people will react to the slender image of the woman and immediately associate the posterior to the swaying hips, others may not catch on as so, and associate the anterior to the same... in the second case, of course, the 3 closely packed dots cannot be associated with the posterior, is it not?... this is my insight.
thebrainfuse 3 years ago
exactly, the male picture looks a lot like the pubic triangle.
ToXeye 3 years ago
Let me just rant on this... notice the midddle 3 dots of the simulation (the ones that denote the hip)... notice that in case of the "woman", these sway more than the same, in the other 2 cases... in my opinion, this would immediately direct the attention of the viewer to the swinging of the hips, rather than the swinging of the arms in the other cases. The greatest factor involved is what i like to call "media conditioning".
thebrainfuse 3 years ago
Useful for figuring out what portion of the human brain is responsible for these kinds of perceptions. See "When the brain flips" as in the Necker Cube.
Rybot9000 3 years ago
let me tell you why there are 50% of ppl think its walking towards them
because they are all guessing, and because they are all guessing, there is only 2 answer, and because there is only 2 answer, there will only be 50%
Alfian001 3 years ago
Pretty sure the illusion is about perception not guessing. I immediately perceive both forms to be walking towards the point of perception. It wasn't a "guess" I conscsiously made, though my brain might have.
Rybot9000 3 years ago
To me, all three appear to walk towards the camera... Although there is no rational explanation.
slayniac 3 years ago 3
me too.
JohnTraviss 3 years ago
i dont get it..
ZehSebastiaan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
scientists and their theories
i want truthful fucking facts not fucking theories
oo well maybe there was a big bang even though i dreamt that high on heroine it could be true mm yeah
they get too much funding for stupid crap like that
they should be doing something useful like eliminate sicknesses
there is no actual cure for a fucking cold
they could start there
cold medicine just helps your body fight the cold it doesnt actually destroy it
u would think by now a cure would be made
titfucker1990 3 years ago
viruses are a different class of life, funding under the current bush admin has really limited the ability to find such cures, though they may be possible. They will also take buckets of money, genetic engineering isnt cheap. And go fuck yourself and your "just a theory" bullshit. Next time you get an infection, be sure to ask for a 1950's dose of penicillin, because evolved antibiotic resistance is "just part of an unproven theory". asshat.
MarkG45 3 years ago 7
mothertitfucker- genius thinking u deserve a nobhead prize dumbass
ijk786 3 years ago 2
hope you are joking, or that was a really ignorant comment.
ccaptorchen 3 years ago
Words can not explain how weak headed you must be writing such a bullshit. You gotta be one of those guys sitting in front of their TV and blaming anyone else for their very own misery. Science never claimed to be the remedy of all problems. It is rather the search for knowledge (you know what that is, right?) for which a theory is necessary in the first place.
slayniac 3 years ago 4
I agree it is a complete waste of time. It gave people like you a way ((the computer)) to share your ignorance with the world.
rengawnevets 3 years ago
You do realize that every scientific breakthrough starts with a theory/hypothesis, right? They have to ask "what if?" before they jump into the work. Maybe you should look into the scientific process a little more before you go around showing everyone how ignorant you are.
DoctorWattson 3 years ago 3
i dont get it
ucrono 3 years ago
I know a young lady who walks just like the gender neutral model, and she is probably the most beautiful woman I have ever met. I wonder if there is something in that?
m1scham 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
yeah, you like the cock.
lol
minomeshank 3 years ago
QFT.
SinisterSapling 3 years ago
most may not see this as a very productive or progressive research topic, but actually this can tell us alot about how our brains and the brains of other animals develop the ability to percieve 3 dimensions. this could lead to new technology for the visually impaired
johnnywhiteshoe 3 years ago
I guess I can flip a switch them, because I can see any of them either way.
fizzybgood 3 years ago
Same. The male one took some time though, but eventually managed to see it walking away.
Neoxym 3 years ago
woman, man, less attractive woman/asexual human
all walking towards
MarkG45 3 years ago 3
i got them all right, but im a fucking genius so yeah/
PopeColbert 3 years ago
same here
snylekkie 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who cares about this...So much money being wasted on unnecessary research like this.
MrPogi87 3 years ago
Yeah I concur; we should be focusing on power, cures, engineering, and other necessities before we worry about the evolutionary development of a brain's interpretation of the movement of the two genders, which would only help us make better models of human brain interpretations of the movement of the two genders...
Truthiness231 3 years ago
fuck off, and go blow 20 dollars at the movie theater, then come back when you figure out how little money is truly spent on research
MarkG45 3 years ago
Dude, I'm a Medical researcher at NYU and they spend a lot of money!
MrPogi87 3 years ago
For me all were walking towards me...
meriwesslie 3 years ago 3
A lot more research to specify what it means is required. Men coming towards them might mean an evolutionary belief in bringing help as in our distant past, wild creatures posed a great threat. Women may run away for safety while men run to you for help. A modern cultural overtone might suggest the approach as ominous--but this is only the lipstick that culture seems to have drawn upon men. Population density lower early in evol. Humans do not focus on joints but extremities and facial feature.
Rikotistic 3 years ago
Convex and concave angles of the elbows shift perception.
swyft187 3 years ago
man i do this in real life cuz i got bad eye sight... i actually see it like this
reddeadlys 3 years ago 2
I got a girl walking away for the first one, and a regular guy walking towards me for the 2nd and a skinnier guy walking towards me for the 3rd
RarewareLover 3 years ago
It changed for me...
happytodd 3 years ago
for me, all three were walking towards me
Zantaer 3 years ago
The reason the woman is walking away is because men are picturing her ass shaking while she's walking (which wouldn't be visible from the front).
soulhunger1 3 years ago 3
there is one problem in that theory though, Sum men prefer boobs
patcorndoggy 3 years ago
and some men prefer men..
enderwigginsx 3 years ago
To everyone who is wondering about the "explanation" just go to the link in the video comment.
JaMoond 3 years ago
At First I couldn't tell if the "Female" Model was walking towards, or Away. but After watching it 3 Times I felt more comfortable with Away, and the "Male" Model I felt was coming Towards me. As for the third. Idk :D
FireMarco 3 years ago
no explanation or theory? bad vid.
ilm444 3 years ago
Ehh I agree, interesting, but no explanation.
Plozen 3 years ago
They all appeared to be walking toward me...
Topecs 3 years ago 3
I think it's where you look on the character. If you look at the chest part, then it looks like they're walking away for all of them. If you look at the abdomen or waist, it looks like they're walking to you, kind of... I don't think it's really going to work but it works for me for some reason.
blindironman202 3 years ago
Who cares if mom's coming or not... I'm coming!!!
pubtor 3 years ago
I think only prostitutes walk like 0:03-0:07...
Idler81643 3 years ago
All walking towards me. Once I read that they were walking away, they were walking away. In a way, a glorified optical illusion.
TogrutaJedi 3 years ago
I see her walking to me.....
But still, there is only 2 people in my bed...
;)
SlashDotDash121 3 years ago
Damn, I prepared to see the woman walk towards me but I still saw it as walking away.
antimistic 3 years ago
Hm. I saw them all walking toward me...
ErisFae 3 years ago
newscientistvideo's videos are dealing with more and more trivial matters...
Japanzor 3 years ago
when i think of swaying hips, i think of a woman walking away from me. when i think of lumbering walk, i think of a man walking toward me. no cues = coin toss
wmacorlando 3 years ago
I would like to know if vizual perception in humans detects edges in motion better then segmented central areas.
Probewitch 3 years ago
i dont understand these things, but good work!
LizzyAston 3 years ago
wdf123, not every researcher is a physicist or biologist with the ability to work on cancer cures.
Anyways, I saw them all walking toward me.
JZScorpion 3 years ago 2
People who are criticizing this are morons. This has to do with cognitive sciences, and how we perceive the world.
I for one find it very interesting.
inthefade 3 years ago 5
how is this important? lets cure cancer first please kthx.
wfd1234567 3 years ago
The girl walked away, the guy towards? Am i right ? =P
acomaco2 3 years ago
This is another joke right?
beliable2 3 years ago
Only if you are color blind.
LittleTruckingBozo 3 years ago
Alright, I love the scientific method and all but...
IT'S A FUCKING STICK MODEL
When looking at a REAL PERSON, 100% see the man and woman walking towards them!!!
So, the data from the model shows some weird patterns... BUT THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANY FUCKING EVOLUTIONARY OR REAL SIGNIFICANCE BECAUSE ITS A FUCKING STICK MODEL!!!
severmine 3 years ago
The people surveyed were not stick models, and THEY ARE a product of Evolution.
Adipatus 3 years ago
THEY ARE ALL WALKING TOWORDS MEH
TOKIOHOTEL399 3 years ago
They all looked like they were walking toward me.
Not sure why there has to be an "evolutionary explanation" for this, as opposed to just a simple "explanation." There are all sorts of visual tricks the brains of some have difficulty interpreting.
dafttool 3 years ago
Yeah dafttool, and there are evolutionary explanations for all of the "visual tricks" that the brain has difficulty understanding.
The brain has evolved to understand a very specific set of stimuli, and when those parameters are pushed, the brain doesn't function ideally.
This can help us understand how and why the brain evolved.
inthefade 3 years ago 2
I have no problem with "evolutionary explanations," I just think sometimes researchers tend to overuse the phrase for effect, making broad, sweeping pronouncements that aren't always backed up by the evidence presented.
dafttool 3 years ago
Evolution does a very good job of explaining a lot of things.. Especially physiology and psychology. And that is exactly why researchers use it a lot.
It isn't a pronouncement, but a hypothesis, that there "might be an evolutionary reason" for it. Hypotheses aren't meant to be backed up by the evidence because they are an initial guess. I'm sure that the next thing they'll do is figure out a way to test that hypothesis.
inthefade 3 years ago 3
i thought they were all walking to me, i had to look hard to see the woman walking away
MiniMaxis468 3 years ago
i saw the woman walking toward me and the man walking away
SaintEthaTV 3 years ago
yep, all walking towards meh.
scullyy 3 years ago
The comedian Gallegar did a whole bit on elbows and walking. In if your a cowbgirl, out if you a cowboy.
chefsanders70 3 years ago
O_o...???
hidro7hypnotiq7 3 years ago
wow... Useless.. How about the Cure for Cancer? or AIDS? Or lab study on rats & radioactive waste?
LilithEnthroned 3 years ago
How about we focus on more than one thing? don't you feel we have room for studies like this? Believe me, the issues you are talking about are being studied endlessly (which is, ofcourse, a good thing)...
HKragh 3 years ago
The Ministry of Silly Walks at it again, eh.
The explanation could be as simple as: those groups who let (or made) their women walk in front of them into ambushes and hungry lions were more likely to survive. And paying attention and trying to identify approaching masculine (possibly aggressive) individuals might be a good idea in terms of survival, too.
How to test or find proof for this? No idea.
clownschuhe 3 years ago
all 3 towards, i would have to agree with below.
oh dear, have we just debunked months of research?
re1d 3 years ago
away, towards, away, i think the direction of the knees seemed to trigger it.
returnofswampthing 3 years ago
I agree, the knees sticking out give an impression of approach. The elbows sticking out give an impression of walking away and the kneews seem dominant.
1) knees together - away
2) Knees apart - toward
3) Knees neutral, elbows take over - away
pknvdw 3 years ago
all towards.
jonjonjonmw 3 years ago
2 towards me.
RandomShortguy 3 years ago
all towards me
Meddlmoe 3 years ago
All towards me! ... and my theory is there is no relation whatsoever with evolution, it's like a stupid cube drawn in perspective, you can always interpret it in 2 positions.
valg8 3 years ago
I see them all walking towards me..
Gplex 3 years ago
The elbows trick you
BigEvan96 3 years ago
all 3 towards
themilkmister 3 years ago
all 3 were coming towards me.. wow cool video
LukaZGD 3 years ago
I don't get it.
MarcelDV 3 years ago
away, away, towards
eldominicanboy 3 years ago
Lol braincheck pls.
DeeJayBounce 3 years ago
that's hot!
xennelul 3 years ago
away towards towards
AsianlVlafia 3 years ago
I see all three models coming and going.
If you think they are going then your are gonna see them going. If you think they are coming then you are gonna see them coming.
It's just a matter of perspective, because all three models are ambiguous in terms of what is the direction of their movement, so our brain may resolve the ambiguity on either of both ways.
hrgwea 3 years ago
all towards me
maximusdazs 3 years ago
same
Swamy456 3 years ago
weird...
shadling21 3 years ago
video is nice, but completely VAPID! what's the conclusion, how is evolution related to this? Put some substance in here
jezzej1979 3 years ago
The idea is to click on their link and go to their site. These vids are just teasers.
bigevasive 3 years ago
For me, it looked like the first one is going away, the other two are coming towards me
attix13 3 years ago
both are coming >.>
Ikus13 3 years ago
this video was kinda dumb...
grandexandi 3 years ago
oh shit lol
Blastacular 3 years ago
ye i too saw her come towards me
Quizerzink 3 years ago
to me both of them come towards me
Guiprazeres 3 years ago 2
same here.
proffesorcat 3 years ago
me too
wontonjohn321 3 years ago
I saw the first woman walking closer and couldn't for the life of me see her walking away...
Syntax01001 3 years ago 3
same
Scooter2020259725 3 years ago
T'was the opposite for me. I found it impossible to see her walking toward the screen.
steevmac 3 years ago
wtf? i see the first one walking towards me, too
JohnnyZoo 3 years ago
I thought both of them walked towards me to be honest.
Vegetto19 3 years ago
i saw the tem all walking away
freakytex 3 years ago
really? :O
uzay2000 3 years ago
Interesting
corporateraider77 3 years ago