Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
Perhaps not as well as Welles, but this was the last thing Peck ever did and will hopefully be remember along with a fantastic career.
candr 5 months ago
Sorry, compared to the original Welles version this this one is sluggish and monotonous. Not nearly the dynamic range of Welles; too much growling.
AF2Z 7 months ago
he's gone full circle.
dicekpapi18 10 months ago
Too much brimestone for the character FAther Mapple. Still, what an amazing actor.
neochristsavant 11 months ago
im confused....Moby Dick had a SEQUEL???and why is Captain Ahab behind of the pulpit???
blueunicorno8 1 year ago
@blueunicorno8 it isn't a sequel. It was remade with Patrick Stewart in the role of Captain Ahab. Peck agreed to do this short preformance as Father Mapple. All in all it is a pretty good movie
2ndRCHAret 1 year ago
O W Was a master as G P. I cant compare the two with any fairness. That said in my taste O W Was more believable in every thing he did... more real. In the original he also played Bildad the co owner of the pequad. I had to look at the credits to make sure. He was that good...
Gunther360 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Peck does a very fine job, but Orson Wells' performance is trandscendant."
Just the opposite, personally. Welles was a genius but Peck's Mapple here is superior. In fact I'd've thought Peck incapable of such a performance, short though it is.
willsclassic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Peck does a very fine job, but Orson Wells' performance is trandscendant."
Just the opposite, personally. Welles was a genius but Peck's Mapple here is superior. In fact I'd've thought Peck incapable of such a performance, short though it is.
willsclassic 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Peck does a very fine job, but Orson Wells' performance is trandscendant."
Just the opposite, personally. Welles was a genius but Peck's Mapple here is superior. In fact I'd've thought Peck incapable of such a performance, short though it is.
willsclassic 1 year ago
Peck does a very fine job, but Orson Wells' performance is trandscendant.
witness2history 1 year ago
@witness2history Wells performance is bushels above Peck's performance as Father Mapple. . . .
duinnerfs 1 year ago
The Best actor ever!!!!!!!!
reegkloes 1 year ago
Sorry to all teh Peck haters,., But This is an epic performance, ten time more alive and animated....
EveryHumanBeing 1 year ago
Absolutely sub par to Orson Welles rendition. Orson was perfect. This was awful compared to him. It was painful to watch especially since Peck was in the original movie.
mvies77 2 years ago
but it deos make the movie more fasinating.
makosharkman 1 year ago
Totally embarassing!
rotterdam1953 2 years ago
Absolutely NOTHING like the one and one only REAL performance from Orson Welles.
rotterdam1953 2 years ago
Stunning. But what else does one expect from Gregory Peck?
cuttock 2 years ago 7
I remember watching this when it first aired and being skepical about a re-make of Moby Dick. This early scene, and what followed, won me immediately, and there were so many memorable scenes to follow.
Holdenon3 2 years ago
A six minute performance by a legendary actor... winner of a Golden Globe award for Best Supporting Actor as Father Mapple.
Jamstebun 2 years ago 5