very nice, Thanks for posting, most adults in USA dont know anything about this war, or Teddy Roosevelt much less young people. They dont make them like Teddy anymore! He was also the last Pres to target shoot on the white-house lawn with his son Kermit, before going to Africa on safari.... he woulda drove the liberals to suicide...hahahaha. But he also set aside more wild land than any pres before or after.
Me tienes hasta los cojones, no hay ninguna carta de rendicion de españa. Napoleon uso el pretexto de invadir portugal para poder pasar un ejercito por españa, una vez en españa esperaba poder derrocar a la monarquia existente y asi ser aclamado como una especie de liberador de españa, pero se equivoco y lo siguiente fue la guerra. Puedes escribir en mayusculas e insultarme todo lo que quieras, que seguiras sin tener razon.
they never surrender, the peasants, civil populations and the rest of the army organizated in guerrillas were the cause of +300,000 french soldier died. They fought despite of being hungry and being betrayed by gvt. The territoy was never conquered. The country belong to the spaniards not to a bastard gvt.
After war Fernando VII banned the new constitution and he become in an absolutist king avoiding the modernization of the country. He was the real problem of spain not the previous war. Fernando vii and his absolutist politics were the main cause of the american liberation movements and the later civil wars(guerras carlistas).
Well i can show you any history book.. even better read one of them yourself..
When was the las war where american soldier were in inferior conditions than his enemies.. maybe in 1812 war against England. The rest of your wars with the exception of your Civil War where outside your country and against inferior enemies and even so, many times you were defeated.. That is a fact
stop smoking you damn fiend. So let me see if I have your fucked up thought process straigth. Being the most powerfula nd well prepared superpower in the world is a BAD thing? fuck no. just cause you poor fuckers can't mount a decent army that is nothing to brag about but a sign of DISGRACE fool. So defeating and liberating S. Korea, Belgium, France, Holland, Nazi's, Japan yoiu consider them inferior? Ultimately they could not match usa but you just proved yourself an ignorant foolass bitch
at least usa never got OWNED by the French like shitty worthless weak Spain did. Napolean fucked you worthless fuckers up big time. Bunch of pussy ass cowards - spain.
wtf are you talkig about you damn fool?? Usa was never defeated and don't even meniton vietnam- usa could have beat n vietnam but the hippy radicals made us pull out. you don't know shit about history. you are laughable.
For Namvetbuck.. EEUU have never won a war against an enemy in the same or inferior conditions.. yo won in wwII because of your industry and because the war was outside of america in Corea (an asian and almost thrid world country) you got a draw, in vietnam you were defeted and so will happen sooner or later in Afghanistan..
EEUU win wars because of its number.. more tanks, more planes, more bombs more soldiers, but never better soldiers.
uh having superiour industry means usa is smarter and more intelligent then you backwards ignorant dumbass mother fuckers. It means usa is SUPERIOUR so that is something usa wears proudly - in yoiur fucked up thinking being inferiors nad less intelligent is somehow a badge of honor? FUCK NO DUMBASS!! What an ignorant thoiught. Usa did not put full forces in Vietnam. We defeated Nazi's Italians, Koreans, Japanese NUFF SAID FUCKER.
En tierra firme les dimos unas buenas palizas. La desgracia fue que nos hundieron dos inservibles flotas. Y sin navíos ya era imposible el envío de suministros; imposible el continuar. Pero repito, en tierra firme la guerra la ganamos los españoles. No sólo lo dicen los datos objetivos. A mí personalmente me lo aseguraba mi bisabuelo. A pesar de venir repatriado en un buque yanqui, los soldados españoles de infantería se sentían vencedores al venir.
España es el único país del mundo que no conoce la palabra "rendirse" en Tierra patria. No se rindieron ante los romanos en Numancia, no se rindieron ante los muslimes durante 8 siglos, no se rindieron ante Napoleón . Reyes y políticos firmaban la paz, pero el pueblo seguía siempre combatiendo.
You really have no clue putaqeres....There has been no time in combat that any American force has had it's ass handed to them like we take it to Spanish speaking armies. That's a FACT !
I'm studying English; and posting with English speaking people is an interesting an useful exercise. I would like you to correct my mistakes in the language.
By de way, three questions:
1. Who won the combat in "The Álamo"?.
2. Have we to consider as American those troops defeated by Bernardo de Gálvez in Panzacola?.
don t insult any fighter. Spanish and american fought both bravely . Spaniards were defeated in the seas, but Spain is a country that never surrender in Homeland, always fight for the freedom and honor. (8 centuries against the muslims, 12 years against Napoleon, never surrender!!!!)
yea - Napolean only conquered and subjugated Spain. Yea that's really getting owned. Sure there was a guerilla war but Spain was RULED BY Napolean so losing independence to a foreign power is a funny way of "owning them". I have no idea what your incoherent reference to ulcers and guerillas is suppose to mean
"The unfortunate war in Spain was the first cause of the misfortunes of France" Napoleon in st. helena
Napoleon didnt conquer spain, he invaded spain using the weak spanish monarchy but the spaniards didnt acept it so they didnt surrender never. 200 french soldiers died per day during 5 years in spain.
The first defeat of french army in napoleon age was against spaniards(battle of bailen), 17.000 french soldiers surrender,
Spain was ruled by NApoleon?Frenchs just owned the floor under their feet. Here comes a comparation:
For inaviding Russia Napoleon created The " Grande Armée " about 500,000 men.
After the French defeat at Bailen (1808) and the withdraw of its brother Joseph I from Madrid, Napoleon himself invaded Spain with an army of 300000 soldiers. Of those 300000 he only could use as movil units about 80000soldiers the rest were used as garrison and for anti-guerrilla warfare.
In fact Napoleon by means of his brother Joseph I, really didnt have a real goverment, nobody obeyed its orders, and so was expresed by Joseph to his brother Napoleon in lots of letters.
Under the lack of goverment, the spanish insurgent created "las Juntas de Gobierno" a provisonal goberment. In fact many of them, beacuse every territory of Spanish Kingdom had its own "Juntas"
After a while "las juntas" decided to have better coordination so created "La Junta suprema Central"
At least Castro never tore down the monument there in his hatred of American democracy. It makes me sad to think that the Americans and the Cuban insurrectos fought to free Cuba from oppressive overlords, only for the Cubans to be oppressed again by a despotic tyrant from their own country. Bless the men of the Rough Riders, the 10th Cavalry, and the 71rst New York Infantry, and the units who supported them in taking those heights. Too bad they weren't around to take care of Castro later.
@captainh321 They had in mind to liberate Cuba, but to establish a protectorate and thus maintain control over the island. Cuba finally gets rid of the USA during the Cuban revolution. You forget what your imperialist government hiso with PR and the Philippines?
Ah!por cierto supongo q sabes q las peliculas no son la mejor fuente de informacion(sobre todo si son belicas, americanas y ellos estan en uno de los bandos..ya sabes la propaganda)lo digo por esa q has visto para imaginarte todo eso q pones..el rifle americano es el Krag-Jogersen lo e escrito mal antes..Los españoles..la mitad enfermos por las fiebres.18 balas por cañon y 132 por soldado
Por curiosidad por q defiendes a los americanos?No eres venezolano?q yo sepa ellos no os tratan muy bien..
Ya que exigimos precison, te dire que los americanos usaban el fusil craig-jogerson que era exactamente igual q el mauser solo que lo emplearon mal,tambien te aseguro que no teniamos ametralladoras y menos maxim por la sencilla razon de que en España no se adopto. Los yankees tambien empleron un globo de observacion q porcierto derribamos.. puede q fueran 600españoles pero seguian siendo 7000americanos 10 cañones y 6gattling. Toda una hazaña.. Y soy aragones y español capullo informate tu antes
Si, tienes toda la razón Mocoso, con la diferencia, de que no eran 400 eran 600 hombres armados con lo último e tecnológia de armamento. El fusil Mauser modelo 1896 y ametralladoras "maxim" intercaladas en dos lineas defensivas y con un par de cañones de tiro largo, emplazados en la cima de la colina.
!informate bien primero y escribe despúes Bravo soldadito gallego!!!
7000 american soldiers, 10 guns 6 gattling machineguns and one observation ballon vs 400 spanish with 150 round per soldier 2 guns with 20 rounds per gun.. and you almost lose the battle.. yes american soldiers are really brave!!
Moving video.
RJM1011 8 months ago
very nice, Thanks for posting, most adults in USA dont know anything about this war, or Teddy Roosevelt much less young people. They dont make them like Teddy anymore! He was also the last Pres to target shoot on the white-house lawn with his son Kermit, before going to Africa on safari.... he woulda drove the liberals to suicide...hahahaha. But he also set aside more wild land than any pres before or after.
mrsmelzbad 1 year ago
alguien conoce la canción? anyone knows the name of the song? thank you
nolisito 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Unos 750 españoles resitieron la ofensiva de 15000 o 20.000 americanos durante todo un día. ¿Quién tuvo más valor?
faransiya 2 years ago
Me tienes hasta los cojones, no hay ninguna carta de rendicion de españa. Napoleon uso el pretexto de invadir portugal para poder pasar un ejercito por españa, una vez en españa esperaba poder derrocar a la monarquia existente y asi ser aclamado como una especie de liberador de españa, pero se equivoco y lo siguiente fue la guerra. Puedes escribir en mayusculas e insultarme todo lo que quieras, que seguiras sin tener razon.
culter806 2 years ago
they never surrender, the peasants, civil populations and the rest of the army organizated in guerrillas were the cause of +300,000 french soldier died. They fought despite of being hungry and being betrayed by gvt. The territoy was never conquered. The country belong to the spaniards not to a bastard gvt.
culter806 2 years ago
After war Fernando VII banned the new constitution and he become in an absolutist king avoiding the modernization of the country. He was the real problem of spain not the previous war. Fernando vii and his absolutist politics were the main cause of the american liberation movements and the later civil wars(guerras carlistas).
culter806 2 years ago
Well i can show you any history book.. even better read one of them yourself..
When was the las war where american soldier were in inferior conditions than his enemies.. maybe in 1812 war against England. The rest of your wars with the exception of your Civil War where outside your country and against inferior enemies and even so, many times you were defeated.. That is a fact
putaqeres 2 years ago
stop smoking you damn fiend. So let me see if I have your fucked up thought process straigth. Being the most powerfula nd well prepared superpower in the world is a BAD thing? fuck no. just cause you poor fuckers can't mount a decent army that is nothing to brag about but a sign of DISGRACE fool. So defeating and liberating S. Korea, Belgium, France, Holland, Nazi's, Japan yoiu consider them inferior? Ultimately they could not match usa but you just proved yourself an ignorant foolass bitch
sdDCCXZCXCCX 2 years ago
at least usa never got OWNED by the French like shitty worthless weak Spain did. Napolean fucked you worthless fuckers up big time. Bunch of pussy ass cowards - spain.
sdDCCXZCXCCX 2 years ago
wtf are you talkig about you damn fool?? Usa was never defeated and don't even meniton vietnam- usa could have beat n vietnam but the hippy radicals made us pull out. you don't know shit about history. you are laughable.
jacksonwaspedo 2 years ago
For Namvetbuck.. EEUU have never won a war against an enemy in the same or inferior conditions.. yo won in wwII because of your industry and because the war was outside of america in Corea (an asian and almost thrid world country) you got a draw, in vietnam you were defeted and so will happen sooner or later in Afghanistan..
EEUU win wars because of its number.. more tanks, more planes, more bombs more soldiers, but never better soldiers.
putaqeres 2 years ago
where are the sources for your information? or are you just stating opinion?
bremenlegation 2 years ago
uh having superiour industry means usa is smarter and more intelligent then you backwards ignorant dumbass mother fuckers. It means usa is SUPERIOUR so that is something usa wears proudly - in yoiur fucked up thinking being inferiors nad less intelligent is somehow a badge of honor? FUCK NO DUMBASS!! What an ignorant thoiught. Usa did not put full forces in Vietnam. We defeated Nazi's Italians, Koreans, Japanese NUFF SAID FUCKER.
sdDCCXZCXCCX 2 years ago
En tierra firme les dimos unas buenas palizas. La desgracia fue que nos hundieron dos inservibles flotas. Y sin navíos ya era imposible el envío de suministros; imposible el continuar. Pero repito, en tierra firme la guerra la ganamos los españoles. No sólo lo dicen los datos objetivos. A mí personalmente me lo aseguraba mi bisabuelo. A pesar de venir repatriado en un buque yanqui, los soldados españoles de infantería se sentían vencedores al venir.
jgarzia000 2 years ago
España es el único país del mundo que no conoce la palabra "rendirse" en Tierra patria. No se rindieron ante los romanos en Numancia, no se rindieron ante los muslimes durante 8 siglos, no se rindieron ante Napoleón . Reyes y políticos firmaban la paz, pero el pueblo seguía siempre combatiendo.
telkines 2 years ago
You really have no clue putaqeres....There has been no time in combat that any American force has had it's ass handed to them like we take it to Spanish speaking armies. That's a FACT !
NamVetBuck 3 years ago
"Bahía Cochinos" sounds a bit Spanish, doesn't it?.
jgarzia000 2 years ago
Wasn't an "American" force guy...Cuban expatriots....nice try, but you get no cigar...unless ya wanna try and steal one from Old Lardass Castro ?
NamVetBuck 2 years ago
Thanks for answering me.
I'm studying English; and posting with English speaking people is an interesting an useful exercise. I would like you to correct my mistakes in the language.
By de way, three questions:
1. Who won the combat in "The Álamo"?.
2. Have we to consider as American those troops defeated by Bernardo de Gálvez in Panzacola?.
jgarzia000 2 years ago
don t insult any fighter. Spanish and american fought both bravely . Spaniards were defeated in the seas, but Spain is a country that never surrender in Homeland, always fight for the freedom and honor. (8 centuries against the muslims, 12 years against Napoleon, never surrender!!!!)
telkines 2 years ago
SPAIN got OWNED by Napolean
sdDCCXZCXCCX 2 years ago
Actually, Napoleon got owned by Spain.
"Spanish Ulcer" and "guerrillas"
culter806 2 years ago
yea - Napolean only conquered and subjugated Spain. Yea that's really getting owned. Sure there was a guerilla war but Spain was RULED BY Napolean so losing independence to a foreign power is a funny way of "owning them". I have no idea what your incoherent reference to ulcers and guerillas is suppose to mean
jacksonwaspedo 2 years ago
"The unfortunate war in Spain was the first cause of the misfortunes of France" Napoleon in st. helena
Napoleon didnt conquer spain, he invaded spain using the weak spanish monarchy but the spaniards didnt acept it so they didnt surrender never. 200 french soldiers died per day during 5 years in spain.
The first defeat of french army in napoleon age was against spaniards(battle of bailen), 17.000 french soldiers surrender,
culter806 2 years ago
@jacksonwaspedo
Spain was ruled by NApoleon?Frenchs just owned the floor under their feet. Here comes a comparation:
For inaviding Russia Napoleon created The " Grande Armée " about 500,000 men.
After the French defeat at Bailen (1808) and the withdraw of its brother Joseph I from Madrid, Napoleon himself invaded Spain with an army of 300000 soldiers. Of those 300000 he only could use as movil units about 80000soldiers the rest were used as garrison and for anti-guerrilla warfare.
putaqeres 11 months ago
@jacksonwaspedo
In fact Napoleon by means of his brother Joseph I, really didnt have a real goverment, nobody obeyed its orders, and so was expresed by Joseph to his brother Napoleon in lots of letters.
Under the lack of goverment, the spanish insurgent created "las Juntas de Gobierno" a provisonal goberment. In fact many of them, beacuse every territory of Spanish Kingdom had its own "Juntas"
After a while "las juntas" decided to have better coordination so created "La Junta suprema Central"
putaqeres 11 months ago
At least Castro never tore down the monument there in his hatred of American democracy. It makes me sad to think that the Americans and the Cuban insurrectos fought to free Cuba from oppressive overlords, only for the Cubans to be oppressed again by a despotic tyrant from their own country. Bless the men of the Rough Riders, the 10th Cavalry, and the 71rst New York Infantry, and the units who supported them in taking those heights. Too bad they weren't around to take care of Castro later.
captainh321 3 years ago 5
@captainh321 They had in mind to liberate Cuba, but to establish a protectorate and thus maintain control over the island. Cuba finally gets rid of the USA during the Cuban revolution. You forget what your imperialist government hiso with PR and the Philippines?
chuzoable 4 months ago
Fuck USA! cuatro Aragoneses ahi y los hubiermos reventado a los 7000 usa soldiers jajaja
alkazaren 3 years ago
Tu mia es un grande perra
forgloryandgators 3 years ago
My great grandfather Buckey O'Neill died there
isthisit15 3 years ago 3
Ah!por cierto supongo q sabes q las peliculas no son la mejor fuente de informacion(sobre todo si son belicas, americanas y ellos estan en uno de los bandos..ya sabes la propaganda)lo digo por esa q has visto para imaginarte todo eso q pones..el rifle americano es el Krag-Jogersen lo e escrito mal antes..Los españoles..la mitad enfermos por las fiebres.18 balas por cañon y 132 por soldado
Por curiosidad por q defiendes a los americanos?No eres venezolano?q yo sepa ellos no os tratan muy bien..
putaqeres 3 years ago
Ya que exigimos precison, te dire que los americanos usaban el fusil craig-jogerson que era exactamente igual q el mauser solo que lo emplearon mal,tambien te aseguro que no teniamos ametralladoras y menos maxim por la sencilla razon de que en España no se adopto. Los yankees tambien empleron un globo de observacion q porcierto derribamos.. puede q fueran 600españoles pero seguian siendo 7000americanos 10 cañones y 6gattling. Toda una hazaña.. Y soy aragones y español capullo informate tu antes
putaqeres 3 years ago
Si, tienes toda la razón Mocoso, con la diferencia, de que no eran 400 eran 600 hombres armados con lo último e tecnológia de armamento. El fusil Mauser modelo 1896 y ametralladoras "maxim" intercaladas en dos lineas defensivas y con un par de cañones de tiro largo, emplazados en la cima de la colina.
!informate bien primero y escribe despúes Bravo soldadito gallego!!!
alejandro954 3 years ago
Las ametralladoras maxim no llegaron a ser desembarcadas de los buques. En San Juan solo hubo ametralladoras gatlin.
siguerascando 2 years ago
7000 american soldiers, 10 guns 6 gattling machineguns and one observation ballon vs 400 spanish with 150 round per soldier 2 guns with 20 rounds per gun.. and you almost lose the battle.. yes american soldiers are really brave!!
putaqeres 4 years ago