Everybody with a mortgage or debt can benefit from this - Jesse & Ben Lowrey

[Welljustanotheruser]

a4v's are dipping into the trust ..ur mother set up ..

u are only allowed it as beneficiary..no one has done that ..

yet..

now one has declared that the holder of the berth certificate..is actually the beneficiary..and u inform the assignee of the trust

[Welljustanotheruser]

the govt releases dollar credit by assigning the berth title from its district registrars to some entity (DTCC, CENTRAL BANK ) backed by full fatih and credit of US and its US sub tax collectors JOHN and JANE DOEs..service paymetns .the credit is used ot grow the assets of the berth trusts

this expalins the CAFR funds ..that the public cannot touch ..since thoe funds are the beenfits of the berth trust of teh stock market ..only benficiaries can touch that ..and use it for discharge of debts..

[Welljustanotheruser]

the mother of all securitisations is the securitsation of the mothers trust's future energy flows

and this is the basis of the fiction credit of the templar banking system

instead they allow a discahrge( future payment..a debt is created in the system ..which as trustee they need to service ..like the fund manager..they oversee this service by appointing re_public(anii) and their members of the public JOHN DOE govt sub tax collectors who are also the administrator of the John Doe trust.

[Welljustanotheruser]

4. they have a ficiton system of credit where u , actually teh berth trust , JOHN DOE are given a promise to pay ..ie future payment..u have dipped into the pool of credit created by the securitisation , backed by usage fee( income tax) and insured ( social insurance)..u as memenr of the public(nii = roman tax collector) and administrator of the trust have to declare that amount and are obliged as publicanii to service the interest of the ficitonal debt.

[Welljustanotheruser]

the fiction credit is created on them having the confidence that :

1. they can program you to not declare your beneficiary status of the berth trust

2. they can then program you to ask payment of labour ( usage of that vessel creted by ur mother , which u havent paid for.

3. since u havent paid for and cannot pay ur mother for her labour and subsequnet use of the vessel..you shouldnt be allowed to accept payment overseen by the trustees that hold the legal title. instead ......

[Welljustanotheruser]

the vessel declared on teh berth certificate has a weight and size that still holds true even after you grow up ,u havent declared that u are the beneficiary and that vessel has now grown up ..utill u do u are only a bearer of the certificate and therefore the administrator(guardian) and ur obligation is to track the usage of the vessell ..pay the usage fee (income tax) when it dips into the holy see of credit created by the securitisation of the future pledges of its usage

[Welljustanotheruser]

the tempalr bankers wear night gowns and the high preists of rome wear frocks..they run the patriarchy for the mother ..they run the matriarchy in trust...the system is perfect ..adn there is no slavery

we havent gorwn up ..literally

the vessel declared on teh berth certificate has a weight and size that still holds true even after you grow up , the legal title that is held by the assignee of that title ( no one has done a security audit of the berth title) very likely it would be the dtcc

[Welljustanotheruser]

at 41.40 ..a possible answer for jesse

jesse 's body ..his mother produced it for him ,laboured ..and when he uses that vessel ...he needs to pay her ..he cannot pay her ..so the berth trust is created whereby they place lien on the legal title of his body ..and this is the origin of the templar banking system to print money ..they have every right to print money ..because u pledge labour in return for money using a vessel that has a lien on its usage.this is the basis of usary..use of the body

[MrJezz62]

Hi ben ,i have just listened to your talk with jesse, and would love to get some links for him regards to the bailiffs information.Would appreciate it.Good stuff that your giving here ,keep up the good work. Jez

[MagnoliaMeadowsFarm]

Ive heard about this- its being called the " produce the note" strategy. if they cannot produce the original note which YOU signed at the closing, they have no claim.

[jpnovation]

“citizenship or declared allegiance to a foreign state generally will not be possible absent substantial evidence, apart from the act itself, that the individual specifically intended to relinquish U.S. citizenship.”

[jpnovation]

“in all agreements entered into by the Sovereign Pontiff this condition is understood: Nisi aliud exigat causa gravis et extraordinaria propter bonum commune ecclesiae. (In other words, unless you show cause of extraordinary evidence that you are not ruled by the Pope you’re presumed to be ruled by The Holy See.)

[Welljustanotheruser]

@jpnovation

hasnt the pope and its institutions(includng the UN declared slavery illegal?

why do they still acknowledge the term Indian to define people in the east and the west..sections of this planet: INDO CHINESE< INDIAN< AMERINDIAN, WEST INDIAN etc...

INdian ..means black slave

so wouldnt that be evidence to prove that teh vatican system cannot possibly own something that defines a term that they themselves have declared illegal

[jpnovation]

When you become “stateless” with no protection, you are then equivalent to an alien. Nationals, State Nationals, citizens, residents, and aliens, all; have the same rights, which are limited civil rights that are granted.

[jpnovation]

The U.S. and its affiliate states have copyrighted all of their “law”. If you use it without a variation of agreement, you are a tort-feasor. The bigger problem here is that an “individual” becomes public enemy #1 of the state when they sue the state, i.e. a paper/domestic terrorist.

[jpnovation]

“Protection draws to it subjection; subjection protection” Protectio trahit subjectionem, subjectio protectionem. Coke, Littl. 65.

[jpnovation]

The defendant has the burden of proof to show the plaintiff is not acting in good faith. The doctrine is often stated as "those seeking equity must do equity" or "equity must come with clean hands".

[jpnovation]

Unclean hands, sometimes called the clean hands doctrine or the dirty hands doctrine,[1] is an equitable defense in which the defendant argues that the plaintiff is not entitled to obtain an equitable remedy on account of the fact that the plaintiff is acting unethically or has acted in bad faith with respect to the subject of the complaint—that is, with "unclean hands".

[violetgypsie]

Interesting. I will check out the talkshoe recordings. Thanks!

[Dre4dwolf]

I agree with a lot of this, BUT the math is starting to point towards their system failing.

IDK if the dollar crashes or not, I would prefer it because usually in a crisis people start asking questions, and questions lead to enlightenment! the world needs the currencies to collapse so that we can grow !

[212nycelle212]

@Dre4dwolf :)

[jpnovation]

To this end, sovereign citizens wage war against the qovernment and other forms of authoritv using "paper terrorism" harassment and intimidation tactics, and occasionally resorting to violence." The "paper terrorism" typically involves "frivolous lawsuits, frivolous liens, fictitious financial instruments, fictitious automobile related documents, and misuse of genuine documents such as IRS forms; various frauds and scams."

[jpnovation]

lts adherents believe that virtually all existing government in the United States is illegitimate and they seek to "restore" an idealized, minimalist government that never actually existed.

[jpnovation]

12.3 "The 'sovereign citizen' movement is a loosely organized collection of groups and individuals who have adopted a right-wing anarchist ideology originating in the theories of a group called the Posse Comitatus in the1970s.

[Psy0psAgent]

@jpnovation Incorrect. Find out who John Quade was. 

[jpnovation]

CIRCUIT & SUPERIOR COURT 38TH JUDICIAL COURT, ALLEN COUNTY, INDIANA RULED IN DILLEY vs. DILLEY in 2007 that:

12.2 The Court notes that Respondent's filings and conduct are consistent with those associated with the "sovereign citizen" domestic terrorist movement.

[abedanger]

*nods* Great work fellas.

"deemed control" = 60-90% fractional shares

"control in fact" = on full share and vote

One must gain "control" of the NAME/PERSON/COMPANY and "continue"/incorporate under the Trust and Loans Companies Act, or "discontinue" (from T&L) and incorporate under another Act, if One is to "carry on business" here (in CANADA).

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) are "guide lines" that corporations adopt in whole or in part and incorporate into statues (rules).

[LetsCook2gether]

what about student loan from the department of education?

[212nycelle212]

@LetsCook2gether In order to kick student loan debt, default on the loan, let it go to a collection agency. Make money every time they call you to collect on the debt, dispute the debt with the collection agency. Wait a year, save all the info you gather. Than you sue them for $1000,s! Collection agencies are a fraud. They're 3rd party debt collectors. You don't have a contract with them, which means you owe $0. They have to prove that you have a obligation to pay them via a contract.

[212nycelle212]

@LetsCook2gether It goes the same for the IRS. IRS is nothing more than a debt collector and the FDCPA applies to them as well. IRS has to validate and prove that you have a contractual agreement with them. 3RD party debt collectors.

[sparkie72]

@212nycelle212 Correct,and I'm guessing that's why A4V doesn't work on anything you sent to the tax office,ATO in my case,people have some results only on tax issues.But no luck on other presentments sent to the ATO.

[sebekkha]

I'd like to know if there is a UK equivalent to the Fdcpa in the UK. I'm sure there is however as yet have only found the consumer credit act 1974 which doesnt appear to carry the same weight.

[sparkie72]

@sebekkha on checking my credit report on D&B here in Australia,at the bottom it has this note;"I confirm that I am requesting a copy of my own Consumer Credit Report and that the details supplied to identify me are true and correct, and I accept D&B's Terms of Use. I understand that it is an offence under the Federal Privacy Legislation to improperly access a copy of a consumer credit report that is not my own and a breach may result in a penalty of up to $30,000"

You would have something.

[sebekkha]

@sparkie72 That's really helpful. I will look into this and let you know of my findings. Many thanks.

[sUNaRMYK]

This is good info. Jesse is talking truth.

[sovereignfreespirit]

When you are talking about the Foreclosure and you mention the part about the NOTE and following the chain of custody.. does this stuff apply in Canada? because I have been told that the Canadian banking systems are more secure about their procedures.. and we don't have MERS up here..

Thanks for the advice about the Forensic Audit.. seems like it could be a waste of money.. if it's NOT going to work??

[TurboGC8]

Where in FLA? I'm in SWFL looking to meet up with other commerce like minded people.

[philipsmovies]

What does Bugs Bunny say to Donald? WHAT'S UP DUCK? Disney is a business world out of hollywood. Banking and Commerce is a fantasy world out of a business world.

[philipsmovies]

What happens if you've sold your house and paid off your mortgage? Is it over and done with, can you not claim fraud retrospectively?

[benlowreyhimself]

@philipsmovies

good question. perhaps you could.

[philipsmovies]

@benlowreyhimself thanks Ben, i am going to look into it. It was 14 years agoi sold it to pay off debts. My solicitor has retired but the fraud may have still taken place.

[212nycelle212]

@philipsmovies You probably can. It will depend on the statue of limitations. You will need to do a discovery in order to find all the info as to which bank owned it etc.

[RAREAvatar]

good interview



[crsbt]

this guy sounds alot like ben fulford.