It MAY just reduce the number of killed people, but still some would be killed! or the killer could even kill the guy with the weapon and than have more bullets and another gun....or the "protector" with the weapon in school could shoot a suspect though it was not armed.
Stupid, just stupid...think about it....1 more weapon near kids in school is 1 potential killing tool more....near kids.
if there were no weapons(at least less by civil persons) at all,there would be less school shootings and the fact then,that someone in the school has a weapon too, does not stop the whole thing in the first place.
It MAY just reduce the number of killed people, but still some would be killed! or the killer could even kill the guy with the weapon and than have more bullets and another gun....or the "protector" with the weapon in school could shoot a suspect though it was not armed.
vdog007 3 years ago
Stupid, just stupid...think about it....1 more weapon near kids in school is 1 potential killing tool more....near kids.
if there were no weapons(at least less by civil persons) at all,there would be less school shootings and the fact then,that someone in the school has a weapon too, does not stop the whole thing in the first place.
vdog007 3 years ago