Beautiful song to dance to closely with your love. The added effects don't harm the original, which is one of my favourites anyway. Thank you for posting this version.
I couldn't disagree with "leonaofficial" more. Who are you (or who am I) to suppose that we know which one is better overall... to YOU, sure! But if I write and record a song... I'll be ding-nabbidied if somebody else is going to tell me I can't OR EVEN THAT I SHOULDN'T re-record it, even in a different style completely.
Be that as it may... I'll completely infuriate you now, by saying that I MUCH prefer the Wet, Wet, Wet version... hee hee hee
I thought you wanted leanofficial to see it; he will probably not just happen to come back to this page; but your comment would be in his inbox if you had made it a reply to his comment.
Dreadful. There arent any re-recordings by any artists that are superior to the original recording by the original artists. Unless you have no discerning musical taste.Everyone should avoid buying any any cd that has the words `this cd contains re-recordings by one or more of the orignal band etc - in other words it`s shite .
a catchy tune. sneaks up on ya. ...glad I can go now
speedoflite1 3 weeks ago
* * * * *
sirronald69 1 month ago
I love this song.
madmax7333 4 months ago
Wow, I don't believe I have ever heard this version before, thanks a million for bringing joy to strangers.
joesphx19 4 months ago
Beautiful song to dance to closely with your love. The added effects don't harm the original, which is one of my favourites anyway. Thank you for posting this version.
keyboardplyr 5 months ago
*****
sirronald69 6 months ago
Nice tune. Period! Original, remake, cover, whatever...!
rcentinella 6 months ago
i lov al versions ov this tune bt troggs is far bettr
Autismo1947 6 months ago
I like the Troggs version, I like the WetWetWet version, I like the R.E.M. version. It's a great song no mater who does, or re-does it.
OldNinjaDude 1 year ago 3
this is about 42.7% as good as the original==sure Reg has the RIGHT to re record HIS song but the original is a masterpiece and this is not.......
tim60s321 1 year ago
i like this version =) still great voice .. that troggy voice =}}
Holms 1 year ago
WOW even better !!!
JOINTTASK1 1 year ago
I couldn't disagree with "leonaofficial" more. Who are you (or who am I) to suppose that we know which one is better overall... to YOU, sure! But if I write and record a song... I'll be ding-nabbidied if somebody else is going to tell me I can't OR EVEN THAT I SHOULDN'T re-record it, even in a different style completely.
Be that as it may... I'll completely infuriate you now, by saying that I MUCH prefer the Wet, Wet, Wet version... hee hee hee
tomhancock69 2 years ago
did you post this as a response to leonaofficials comment? If you didn;t he will never see it.
50s60sAnd70sMusic 2 years ago
i dont even know what the hades-fire youre talking about... the comment is up there for all to see... you need to be more explicative...
tomhancock69 2 years ago
I thought you wanted leanofficial to see it; he will probably not just happen to come back to this page; but your comment would be in his inbox if you had made it a reply to his comment.
50s60sAnd70sMusic 2 years ago
Dreadful. There arent any re-recordings by any artists that are superior to the original recording by the original artists. Unless you have no discerning musical taste.Everyone should avoid buying any any cd that has the words `this cd contains re-recordings by one or more of the orignal band etc - in other words it`s shite .
leonaofficial 2 years ago
@leonaofficial Soon, they will have brain transplants. You'll be OK.
Maybe.
MickeyYahoo 1 month ago