Yes, still some GI's in the Nam didn't like the M16A1 due to what they thought was poor stopping power. I've seen vids of M14's been used by grunts in the latter 1/2 of the war. They didn't drop the M14's for the M16A1's due to the knock-down power the 7.62 has.
But, yes it's true as you stated, out of a 20" barrel, the 5.56 will cause decent damage to the target.
Just a brief reading thru some comments and it becomes ever more clear just what type of people roam youtube.. The self proclaimed "experts", the I dont know wtf im talking about, and the if you argue with me ill call you a Mother F____er. Lol. I just feel bad for guys that dont have a clue and read the comments. They for sure are doomed to be miss informed
@semiautoriflelover1 My next video im going to bring my Mk12 out into a wide open area say its 3 miles and make the longest shot ever. All without ever giving any proof of range, target, or hits.. Youtube is great, lol
@jetfuel545 when have you ever seen proof of any distance on you tube. Your m16 videos aren't any better. I'm sorry that facts don't mach up with your propaganda, but all normal people I am sure were not surprised by this vid. The AK isn't the most used weapon for nothing. PEOPLE LOVE IT. Its the most famous for a reason.
@SnowBroProductions You mean your Propaganda does not match up with reality. The Ak is not and never will be a long range rifle, and sending rounds downrange does not equal hits and certainly not at 1000yd. There are countless examples of range proofed videos here on youtube. They are easy as pie to find. This one is simply fake
@jetfuel545 when firing single shot its just like firing a 30-06. The ak isnt as accurate as an m16 in full auto, but its not as inaccurate as western tv portrays. Are they just jealous that a weapon made in the 40's kicks their ass.
The real funny thing is they don't even mention the ak74 EVER. it just blows the m 16 OUT OF THE WATER.
In other words I don't even care so much about the ak47 because we got the 74 now, and you can't even begin to compare it to an m 16.
@ThePoisonYouth It has more to do with the fact that the gasses are fully devoted to push the round out, making the round fly faster and have a flatter trajectory. Semi-autos/autos siphon off the gasses power to reload another round. That's why a bolt action with the same barrel length usually beat out semis. Also, recoil doesn't affect you until the bullet leaves the barrel, so it has no bearing on the accuracy of single shots, only follow ups, and autos.
@budmeister AK 103 IS 7,62 , HOW CAN SOMEONE BE TO STUPID TO HAVE INTERNET , BUT NOT TO TIPE AK-103 ON GOOGLE AND SE THAT IT IS 7,62 BEFORE HE COMMENTS ..... MAJMUNE
@budmeister The AK103 and 104 are 7.62x39 mm cartridge. The AK101 and 102 on the other hand is 5.56x45 and the AK105 is 5.45x39. AK 107 is 5.45x39 and then finally the AK108 is 5.56x45
Why is everyone is saying that AK IS A RIFLE?!?!??!?! Oo It's not! It's never been... It's European&US went by the way of AUTOMATIC RIFLES... AK it's a special mobile machinegun named - Avtomat, it's not a rifle... we've got rifles and they are not avtomat's =) they are - vintovka's.
@TheWreaperlomelindes I can call my car a Ferrari but that doesn't make it a Ferrari. It's an assault rifle because it has select fire ability, uses detachable magazines AND most of all, it uses an intermediate round, the 7.62x39mm.
Machineguns are usually considered to have a cooling system/quick barrel change system, and fire full rifle rounds.
@smyers820gm ok , Fuckface , first off, in somalia MANY reports indicated the 5.56 did not have good firepower and/or tumbling and many targets were hit multiple times and kept on running. The 5.45 has superior Balistics that ALWAYS CONSISTANTLY FRAGMENT , TUMBLE , YAW unlike the Garbage 5.56. as of accuracy , its smaller and is being shot out of a virtually recoiless gun....ARE YOU AN IDIOT? i own these guns and have done this MYSELF to ballistic gelatin. HAVE YOU MA'ME?
Any AK Type rifle that isnt the Ak-47 is accurate. i know this because i own two Izhmash made Ak Rifles. ( i live in rusija ) and the 74M and 74 original can hit in a small box perfectly fine on full auto and hit in the same area up to 400-800 meters perfectly if done well because of no recoil. the 5.45x39 is superior to 5.56x45 round so it is more accurate and has more power than it due to the tumbling and fragmenting affect of the consistant yawing. which is absent on the M16-M4 type rifles.
@Evilsnowman2213 Dude are you delusional? Nobody on earth would dare to compare the 5.45 to the 5.56 I mean damn how fucking stupid can you get? Now I have heard that the "poison bullet" thing. That is yaws this way and that and does "horrendous" damage in soft tissue..blah blah blah.... where have I heard that crap before?? OOOHHHHH yeah the 5.56 during the vietnam era. I dont know maybe is does have a massive wound channel but there's no way in hell you can compare it in accuracy,power
@smyers820gm Listen here man. "Accuracy and have power" have only to do with how you reload your own stuff. Problem is, nobody reloads 545. Its a mathematically more devastating bullet. A shooter like you most likely couldn't tell the two apart. Besides the 545 has less recoil. AK74 represent.... "MASSIVE WOUND" channel and miniscule accuracy differences to do toleration of 2 machines. Almost not arguable. Just try both out to see.
@japimportssuck Ok let me start with "a shooter like you"...dude I'm a former US Marine. In case you only know Jack and Shit and jack left you, call up Mr Google..he can explain about the long history of the US Marines and their fanatical attachment to marksmanship. Also their is DOCUMENTED testing in the US that debunk the "poison bullet" line. Just like the 5.56 was proven to be full of shit w/ the massive wound thing. At the end of the day it is and always will be about shot placement !
@smyers820gm Dude, I shot a mag of 5.45 and I had 8 trees sawed in half (my woods), due to the 1/2" metal rod inserted into n76 military shit. This was aiming at a target, You'll never convince me that 5.56 is "worse" than 5.45.
@japimportssuck Maybe my crappy typing didn't say what I wanted to get across. I'm not saying the 5.56 is worse than the 5.45. They are very similar. I'm just saying that all the "super killer" stories about both rounds are bogus...crap..NOT true. To be one shot stoppers depends on shot placement. You hit low or high to the right or left the bad guys shooting at you will still be shooting at you. Center mass=LIGHTS OUT...engage another target.
@smyers820gm I'm not sure if 7.62 was designed to fragment on impact, but 5.56 and 5.45 were, and do fragment to dozens of pieces into your body. I think that I'd rather be hit by 7.62 that goes straight through, than a 5.56 that warrants a team of surgeons to get all the shit out of me.
In any case, both incapacitate and kill, but fast death only occurs if a vital spot is hit. Otherwise it's possible that the guy will keep going for a long time, depending where he is hit (even multiple times)
@japimportssuck Can you please clear up your post for me? I read that as one magazine sawing 8 trees in half. I don't think I'm reading this correctly.
@smyers820gm Actually the 5.56 "massive wounding" is not a myth. If you fire a 5.56 out of a 20"+ barrel that has a high twist ratio to the rifling, the 5.56 will absolutely fuck any target up that it hits.
This is what the m16's of Vietnam did. The m16's of today have a much lower twist ratio to the rifling which makes the "massive wounding" of the 5.56 obsolete. This is because a low twist rate is accurate.
The 5.45 7n6 rolls, yaws, and tumbles regardless of barrel length or twist ratio.
@corpralj3 isnt it because the bullet tumbles right? It was clear the ak-74 was the winner between the AR and the AK-74. I shot both at a 8 inch piece of wood, and the damage from the 5.45x39 round was much nastier that the .223. The .223 made a clean hole...
@ELITEWAFFLES9 While I like AKs and recently got a Russian SKS, the AK-103 doesn't fire 7.62 and AK47s aren't this accurate, this AK probably fires 5.45 or 5.56 if I remember right. AKs were made for urban combat anyway who the fuck shoots at a building 1000 yards down the street? Lol
@DystruktoBoi1 Uhhh... sorry to burst your bubble... but the AK-103 fires the 7.62. I would also think that this a different AK model perhaps the 104 or 105 which shoot the 5.45 or 5.56.
@FIREYOGUNZ4456 actually there were variations for most of them, u are right the AK-103 was strictly 7.62. I get my AKs mixed up with the newer ones, they have an AK101, AK102 etc.....up to an AK108. However they still only standard issue AK74's as the rest are still under research and development.
@DystruktoBoi1 nah its the 103 is in 7.62... and the AK was designed just as a general purpose weapon, not as an urban assault rifle. If Aks arent that accurate, than how do you explain those tracers hitting the same spot? Aks may not be as accurate as AR15s, but they arent actually that bad... put it in the hands of someone specially trained or just a good marksman, it can be very accurate. (experienced)
@ELITEWAFFLES9 The AK47 and AK74 and of course all guns based on them were made as "general purpose" weapons yes, but after world war 2 with the extreme new environment of urban combat fresh in the minds of the Russian military leaders, all guns made now are geared usually toward smaller, faster, more accurate and lighter, since most combat happens in towns and cities now. good example standard issue M14 and M16s in the open jungle combat of Vietnam, now we use mini 14s and M4 carbines.
@ELITEWAFFLES9 And yes I know my example was of American guns but that was one of the best examples I could think of, I'm not super familiar with too many other nations war history.
@JAdO205 i agree to the first paragraph but second paragraph it basically retarded.
American can't afford ammo themself, they don't even make their own ammo anymore the chinese do. making you their bitch. Advanced technology does win the war you moron, if it didn't you ass would be kissing the german armies ass.
300 million americans? i don't think thats the number i saw in Census. americans .yeah no! your a mixed nation filled with europeans, asian,hispanic culture, polish,you name it
@JAdO205 On one hand you wouldn't nuke Sweden, the fallout would damage Europe and Russia (Russia might respond to this)
But yeah, Sweden has a military expenditure of virtually nil, and would never try their luck with anyone.
To JukkAMoviE, you are clearly deluded, want a fight, don't bother with the US, come to England, that way when your arse gets handed to you the walk, flight or sea voyage of shame will be much, much shorter.
@JAdO205 . I know you guys will fuck our country easy as hell , but before , Sweden was the biggest and greatest country in the world. We defeted every one and had the strongest army.. But then it all happend.. TECHNOLOGY.. In sweden we still are using old shit. I do now know cuz i'm with the swedish airforce. lol .
Yeah but that isn't what he is using, also the drop is more along the lines of 26 at 300 and at 500 you would have about 118 inches of drop, if you can compensate for the drop you can hit targets out to 1000 yards, also that is with standard FMJ's, if you are using something close to match ammo you will see those groupings tighten up.
HAHAHA I seriously hope you are kidding, and no look at the magazines buddy thatts a 7.62 AK, and no it isn't 20 inches off target at 50 yards, 7.62 is capable of submoa accuracy, thats less than an inch at 100 yards, with a 5 round grouping. And if you have optics hitting something at a 1000 yards is a bit easier, and he is using them.
@acidburn134 HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, every body knows that the 7.63x30 cartidgre its not a good long range proyectile, it has a tremendus drop, and it loses a lot of energy after 200 mts (if you dont believe me watch the nutfancy specail "ar 15 vs ak 47"), hiting a target at 1000 mts its hard even with a bolt action sniper rifle, so is not that easy to do this with a assault rifle, where you get that stupid concepts from? some kind of videogame?
No, it isn't good at long ranges and you are correct, at a thousand yards it is hard to hit something, it's not from video games but from ballistics tests, you can find many ballistics programmes, no its not the real thing, but its better than opinions, if you have an optic you can compensate for the drop. I don't need to watch nutnfancy to know these things, he has turned into a salesman.
@acidburn134 man even if you conpensate the drop of the bullet, the wind and the natural unaccuracy of the non flotable canon of that modificated ak 103 (note that the gas positon its disablen and they are using the rifle as a bolt action rifle) will make that shot a very hard one, a dn i know bu experience that the 7.63x39 its not very stable at long ranges...
It's possible to do, and the rifle isn't modified much from it's original form, they gas tube is just not operational thus getting rid of the semi-automatic fire. Yes the 7.62x39 drop after 300 yards, but that doesn't mean it completely runs out of energy and falls to the ground, you need to compensate like 118 inches at 500 yards, I could be wrong but I can't use my ballistic calculator to check. 7.62 is capable of 1000 yard shots.
@acidburn134 IM not saiyng its imposible, but its hard, and the disable of the gas tube makes the weapons very accurated due to the lack of internal movements when its fired, just like a bolt action rifle, in fact they are firing a ak 103 bolt action rifle, and i think its using a rpd barrel, but i coudl be wrong
@curseofa5r5a I'd say it's very possible as being proven on this video and no it's not some special barrel either. Though I know you looked at your AR and cried a little when you saw this video. AK reliability with 1000 meter hits! They are in Great Brittan. Semi-auto is illegal so they cut the gas piston off- hence he has to hand cycle it. That barrel is an original AK 103 barrel, not some RPK barrel. You would need a switch on your gas block just like the Yugo AK- to do the same thing.
@mbsells77 i have no guns, but i part of a shoting group (only .22 pistol and carabines are legal here) and let me tell you that movile parts afec accuracy considerably, even barrel armonics afect them, im not sayn the AK plataform its very unacurated, im just sayng that a shot like this its hard just like that
No that isn't an RPK barrel, that is all AK-103, apart from the disabled gas-tube. Also the internal moving parts don't effect accuracy as much as people think, AR guys just use that to try to say the AK is very inaccurate when that isn't the case. There is no true AK bolt action rifle, apart from some that are made in pakistan. What you see in this video is very possible with an optic, as shown.
@mbsells77 I Bought a Maadi AK47 in 2007 and loved it. It has never Jammed It is fairly accurate the ammo is cheap. I put a bit of money into it in a new stock rail etc. etc. In 2009 I bought and AR-15 Flat Top and I can tell you I can barely bring myself to fire that AK anymore. The AR is just as reliable way more accurate lighter and is just a better rifle. I was a big time AK fan boy until I bought that AR.
hahaha tell the russian and the us army to use the .22lr in ww3 idiot how tha fuck you could be so stupid lol to say even to compare a 22 round against a round of an ak hahah your shitty round will penetrate shit in point blank when u have body armor hahaha and the spitball will slice your fucking body damn bro there u have it stop posting so dumb comments nothing against you but that wuz hilarious =)
Just wondering why does he reload manually? Did he purposely block the gas system to ensure that all the gas is expended propelling bullet or to reduce the muzzle jump?
It might have an iron sight marked to 1000m but the shooter had a scope and one would need one also to be effective. I'm not knocking AKs, I love 'em.
Most AK shooting videos are not past 50 yards so it's nice to see someone try some long range stuff with a scope. Even though we never see any targets or hits.
maybe you think that bullet wont hurt you...but it will fuck you up...i have to say sorry about US propaganda...dude you can kill someone with .308 up to 1600m..and with ak 1000...my opinion..the bullet ETA is moderate not so fast... 3 seconds...but for a rifle like the ak is pretty fast...human skull is as thin as a light bulb... it will kill you ...i think so..what..you think .223 will kill you at 1000m.. cmon...
would you stay as a target in that distance in front of ak...tell me
i have a long barreled ak-47..maybe longer than tabuk..i dont know where the hell is made..it looks like chinese type-56...but it doesnt have a stamp or something..i more think its an albanian type..direct copy from chinese but the barrel is long as fuck...i have never tried shooting at long range..but i'll do it..penetrates a 60 cm pine tree without any problem...
well. who gives a damn. When Aliens will attack us , Sweden will be the leading country cuz of the technology. We will be able to shoot them dowm with a 10000000000billiontrillionBilliwatt laser.. but who cares.. both countrys are against terrorism and such,,., but still.. i dont like america ;) but thats just my opinion :) hehe
@JAdO205 well.. yeah.. BUT. Swedish army have MUCH better technology then america have.. that make us smarter. If you guys had the same tec as we do, america would probly be undefeatebly.. but , thats just one reason that America dont dare to do anything to us in the nordic countries.. we have submarines that no one can spot and we have the strongest weapons and tanks , and airplanes.. we would defeat your country in 5 hours and russia would come with us and denmark, finland och norwigen.. FU
Haha what a joke. You guys are only fat and stupid. America are voted nr1 for the most fatest country in the world. and tell me.. you guys only have fat in your brian. and your ppl even hate them self " God hate america " hahah.. that i call stupid AND you have a fucking nigger as a president!?!?!? HAHAHA.. i almost laught my ass of me when i heard.. you guys are SO fucking domed. he are gonna kill all of you white boys
@JukkAMoviE first off, i didn't vote for the commie bastard. Secondly, I love my country, it has been good to me and my family and I can do pretty much what I want.
As for being a fat nation, well I cant be responsible for other lazy losers. I'm a trim 200 at 6 feet (thats 2m for you) I can do a 20 miles a day in the mountains with a full pack and rifle. I take care of myself.
And as for those God hates America bunch, fuck em. They are ungrateful sacks of shit on the same level of "Hanoi" Jane Fonda. They're entitled to their opinions and I'm entitled to think they are retards.
@JukkAMoviE Were not all bad guys, its just we have a lot of people stuck living in towns with no communication to the real outside world. The landmass is so big, it unfortunately breeds ignorance. Im sorry if a fellow american offended you, i like sweden. U guys are smart, and ur Snus is great. Cheers!
Even though I'm from Northern Ireland I thought I'd just say that isn't a strictly fair point, by size and population, America is huge by comparison to most countries, so comparing the two isn't exactly fair. Like saying my aeroplane will beat your skoda in a race.
@GARTV101 first of all. i dont even know what the fuck you just wrote. Second of all. I dont give a damn. 3 of all. YOU dont even know a shit. A little 19 years old faggot. In sweden we can own all kind of weapons to. AND the technology is the same as rest in the world. I suggest that you go to school , skip WoW , skip suck justin biebers cock and then stop fuck yourself with a buttplugg. After you done that, feel free to write to me again , and ill own you ass again with letters. Be afraid.
@JukkAMoviE in my country's point of view, we wouldn't serve with the U.S. You just decided to jump in WWII and take full credit for entering europe. yeah you .america took down japan. thats rit japan and almost lost. if they hadn't deployed op. little boy you would have been taken over.you had all your sweet time to create the bomb noone invaded america.
@siz232 First of all, i'am not from fucking sweden, i'am from finland, and second of all, you russian fags have already proven that your country is the faggiest stupidest country in the world. Your army sucks, you are poor as hell, no real civilization nor water, and finland will fuck your country again as we did in ww2, fucking fag communist.
Most ppl assume 400m is the maximum range of 7.62x39mm when thats actually its maximum "effective range" meaning the range at which you get a reliable grouping not the range at which the round runs out of kinetic energy.
1000 yds is too much even for SVD (russian marksman rifle) Effective range of AK is 400 yds (SVD - 600 yds). For 1000-1500 yds distances russians use AVSK sniper rifle.
Why does he have to cycle the rifle on every shot? Isn't it a full-auto with semi select rifle? BTW, I don't think (even on calm, windless day) that an ak cartridge could be accurate out to 1,000 yds but a realistic range for it would be more like 300 yards at best. At 400-yds, the ak cartridge drops is right around +60"; so if this guy trying to hit something that far (1,000-yds) with the ak cartridge then he must aim for the sky and hope that the trajectory will guide the round into the target
When shooting at that range with that kind of gun he needs all the accuracy he can get, and a piston flinging back at him is not going to help one bit. I believe those variants have a gas cut off switch, but he may have simply taken the piston rod out......and wallah you have a pull back bolt action....
The UK banned semi-auto rifles (not sure about handguns) some time ago, so the rifles need to be single fire... pretty stupid law, in my opinion. And I agree with you, 1,000 yards is just too much for the average shooter/soldier.
i am russian i've been to the army and i must disagree with u in 2 years time i shot 4 times i mean 4 magazines ( in 2 years) if it makes me axperienced then we have the most expirienced army in the world
The Russians yeah but the chinese, I don't know man. They don't even have enough weapons to provide the entire military. They still have people equipped with the SKS.
Well maby, If you look for any PLA video here on youtube they look pretty well equiped but then again they would want to give the impression that every chinese soldier is trained & equiped to the same standerd as the US wouldn't they? Guess we won't know for shure until the big one, as they say the proof of the budding is in the eating.
Honestly average anyone is not going to hit targets that far away....I do long range shooting on a regular basis anywhere from 800m-1400m but it is with my .308 remington......with my ak I can realistically hit a human sized target out to 300m max any further it is hit or miss, Im talking off hand here.
@damarei funny because i trained there from the age of 19 it there where so much homosexuals why did we all have wifes coming to work pissed off at husbands cheating on other woman. if were so piss ass poor then america is shit ass poor.
because your borrowing such a large amount of money from the chinese.
yeah that true.. even sweden has much better army and technology. But tell me, who doesnt hate america?. they sucks they are only overpowerd cuz they have like 100000 kids in the army and then 10000 niggers that only trying to make some rap music.. in sweden we have only good ppl. good technology and good everything :D
the 7,62x39 bullet has enought energy to kill a man from 1500m. This is the max for this round. on an ak it would be less on a sniper rifle it would be more but the max is 1500m. the 223 max dist is 1000m. the point is if you know how to calculate your tragectory you can shoot with an ak between 600-1000m
ok lets talk about this one to at that distance weight plays main role shooting 7.62x39mm and hitting target 1000m will make double penetration then .223(5.56mm) so then if you go and look charts about bullet losing it`s elevation and drops from sky that will not effect bullets killing ability so like i said more weight more energy at long distance
not necessarily the bullet weight means all the difference.....at 1000 m the 7.62x39 is going a hella of a lot slower then your standard .223 round you have to factor in that weight and powder charge more weight means bigger powder charge ratio and frankly most ak rounds do not have that lethality capability
robert02109REO......what have you been using....like 50 year old surplus 7.62x39mm? anything that falls out of the sky will regain it's energy given enough height. the AK round will kill any human even if it came from a mortar-like path from the sky.
falling objects if all kinetic energy is lost fall at the same constant speed which is less then the velocity needed for a round to kill someone....yes it is true if you fire off a barrage of bullets "mortar like" in the direction of someone yes maybe one of there bullets will have some kinetic energy left but if you are following proper shooting principles then the 2 miles rules is in affect rendering most rifle rounds as ineffective including the 7.62x39
@MrUnworthyOne let them think whatever they want. They don't touch us because they can't and they know it.
SnowBroProductions 3 weeks ago
@corpralj3
Yes, still some GI's in the Nam didn't like the M16A1 due to what they thought was poor stopping power. I've seen vids of M14's been used by grunts in the latter 1/2 of the war. They didn't drop the M14's for the M16A1's due to the knock-down power the 7.62 has.
But, yes it's true as you stated, out of a 20" barrel, the 5.56 will cause decent damage to the target.
powmful 2 months ago
i never would have thought you could do this with an AK.
powmful 2 months ago
Just a brief reading thru some comments and it becomes ever more clear just what type of people roam youtube.. The self proclaimed "experts", the I dont know wtf im talking about, and the if you argue with me ill call you a Mother F____er. Lol. I just feel bad for guys that dont have a clue and read the comments. They for sure are doomed to be miss informed
jetfuel545 3 months ago
I don't see anything here, I could make a video firing in a field and claim I used a .22lr to hit at 2000 but it doesn't prove anything.
semiautoriflelover1 3 months ago
@semiautoriflelover1 My next video im going to bring my Mk12 out into a wide open area say its 3 miles and make the longest shot ever. All without ever giving any proof of range, target, or hits.. Youtube is great, lol
jetfuel545 3 months ago
@jetfuel545 when have you ever seen proof of any distance on you tube. Your m16 videos aren't any better. I'm sorry that facts don't mach up with your propaganda, but all normal people I am sure were not surprised by this vid. The AK isn't the most used weapon for nothing. PEOPLE LOVE IT. Its the most famous for a reason.
SnowBroProductions 3 weeks ago
@SnowBroProductions You mean your Propaganda does not match up with reality. The Ak is not and never will be a long range rifle, and sending rounds downrange does not equal hits and certainly not at 1000yd. There are countless examples of range proofed videos here on youtube. They are easy as pie to find. This one is simply fake
jetfuel545 3 weeks ago
@jetfuel545 when firing single shot its just like firing a 30-06. The ak isnt as accurate as an m16 in full auto, but its not as inaccurate as western tv portrays. Are they just jealous that a weapon made in the 40's kicks their ass.
The real funny thing is they don't even mention the ak74 EVER. it just blows the m 16 OUT OF THE WATER.
In other words I don't even care so much about the ak47 because we got the 74 now, and you can't even begin to compare it to an m 16.
SnowBroProductions 3 weeks ago
what's up with the feeding?
ThePoisonYouth 6 months ago
@ThePoisonYouth
brtish gun laws
RedGunBullets 5 months ago
@RedGunBullets hrm, not cycling from the shot might help in the accuracy department.. usually less moving parts = less barrel vibration
ThePoisonYouth 5 months ago
@ThePoisonYouth It has more to do with the fact that the gasses are fully devoted to push the round out, making the round fly faster and have a flatter trajectory. Semi-autos/autos siphon off the gasses power to reload another round. That's why a bolt action with the same barrel length usually beat out semis. Also, recoil doesn't affect you until the bullet leaves the barrel, so it has no bearing on the accuracy of single shots, only follow ups, and autos.
JonMan347 4 months ago
@ThePoisonYouth Gas parts removed to conform with British firearm regulations.
sockschappercat 5 months ago
7.62 mm rocks!!!!
MrPoshito69 7 months ago
@MrPoshito69 AK-103 isn't 7.62, it's smaller.
budmeister 6 months ago
@budmeister AK 103 IS 7,62 , HOW CAN SOMEONE BE TO STUPID TO HAVE INTERNET , BUT NOT TO TIPE AK-103 ON GOOGLE AND SE THAT IT IS 7,62 BEFORE HE COMMENTS ..... MAJMUNE
vucicevic5 6 months ago
@budmeister The AK103 and 104 are 7.62x39 mm cartridge. The AK101 and 102 on the other hand is 5.56x45 and the AK105 is 5.45x39. AK 107 is 5.45x39 and then finally the AK108 is 5.56x45
WickyWiggstaz 5 months ago
Why is everyone is saying that AK IS A RIFLE?!?!??!?! Oo It's not! It's never been... It's European&US went by the way of AUTOMATIC RIFLES... AK it's a special mobile machinegun named - Avtomat, it's not a rifle... we've got rifles and they are not avtomat's =) they are - vintovka's.
TheWreaperlomelindes 10 months ago
@TheWreaperlomelindes I can call my car a Ferrari but that doesn't make it a Ferrari. It's an assault rifle because it has select fire ability, uses detachable magazines AND most of all, it uses an intermediate round, the 7.62x39mm.
Machineguns are usually considered to have a cooling system/quick barrel change system, and fire full rifle rounds.
bf2lover42 9 months ago
@TheWreaperlomelindes wtf avtomat is a word, means automatic, its not a kind of gun...
reblo111 9 months ago
@smyers820gm ok , Fuckface , first off, in somalia MANY reports indicated the 5.56 did not have good firepower and/or tumbling and many targets were hit multiple times and kept on running. The 5.45 has superior Balistics that ALWAYS CONSISTANTLY FRAGMENT , TUMBLE , YAW unlike the Garbage 5.56. as of accuracy , its smaller and is being shot out of a virtually recoiless gun....ARE YOU AN IDIOT? i own these guns and have done this MYSELF to ballistic gelatin. HAVE YOU MA'ME?
Evilsnowman2213 10 months ago
Any AK Type rifle that isnt the Ak-47 is accurate. i know this because i own two Izhmash made Ak Rifles. ( i live in rusija ) and the 74M and 74 original can hit in a small box perfectly fine on full auto and hit in the same area up to 400-800 meters perfectly if done well because of no recoil. the 5.45x39 is superior to 5.56x45 round so it is more accurate and has more power than it due to the tumbling and fragmenting affect of the consistant yawing. which is absent on the M16-M4 type rifles.
Evilsnowman2213 11 months ago
@Evilsnowman2213 Dude are you delusional? Nobody on earth would dare to compare the 5.45 to the 5.56 I mean damn how fucking stupid can you get? Now I have heard that the "poison bullet" thing. That is yaws this way and that and does "horrendous" damage in soft tissue..blah blah blah.... where have I heard that crap before?? OOOHHHHH yeah the 5.56 during the vietnam era. I dont know maybe is does have a massive wound channel but there's no way in hell you can compare it in accuracy,power
smyers820gm 10 months ago
@smyers820gm Listen here man. "Accuracy and have power" have only to do with how you reload your own stuff. Problem is, nobody reloads 545. Its a mathematically more devastating bullet. A shooter like you most likely couldn't tell the two apart. Besides the 545 has less recoil. AK74 represent.... "MASSIVE WOUND" channel and miniscule accuracy differences to do toleration of 2 machines. Almost not arguable. Just try both out to see.
japimportssuck 9 months ago
@japimportssuck Ok let me start with "a shooter like you"...dude I'm a former US Marine. In case you only know Jack and Shit and jack left you, call up Mr Google..he can explain about the long history of the US Marines and their fanatical attachment to marksmanship. Also their is DOCUMENTED testing in the US that debunk the "poison bullet" line. Just like the 5.56 was proven to be full of shit w/ the massive wound thing. At the end of the day it is and always will be about shot placement !
smyers820gm 9 months ago
@smyers820gm K Sarge! 10-4, Former good listener!
japimportssuck 9 months ago
@smyers820gm Dude, I shot a mag of 5.45 and I had 8 trees sawed in half (my woods), due to the 1/2" metal rod inserted into n76 military shit. This was aiming at a target, You'll never convince me that 5.56 is "worse" than 5.45.
japimportssuck 9 months ago
@japimportssuck Maybe my crappy typing didn't say what I wanted to get across. I'm not saying the 5.56 is worse than the 5.45. They are very similar. I'm just saying that all the "super killer" stories about both rounds are bogus...crap..NOT true. To be one shot stoppers depends on shot placement. You hit low or high to the right or left the bad guys shooting at you will still be shooting at you. Center mass=LIGHTS OUT...engage another target.
smyers820gm 9 months ago
@smyers820gm Yeahs, they're both viscious.
japimportssuck 9 months ago
@smyers820gm I'm not sure if 7.62 was designed to fragment on impact, but 5.56 and 5.45 were, and do fragment to dozens of pieces into your body. I think that I'd rather be hit by 7.62 that goes straight through, than a 5.56 that warrants a team of surgeons to get all the shit out of me.
In any case, both incapacitate and kill, but fast death only occurs if a vital spot is hit. Otherwise it's possible that the guy will keep going for a long time, depending where he is hit (even multiple times)
Jairion 4 months ago
@japimportssuck Can you please clear up your post for me? I read that as one magazine sawing 8 trees in half. I don't think I'm reading this correctly.
JonMan347 4 months ago
@JonMan347 An AK-74 shoots a naughty bullet.
japimportssuck 4 months ago
@smyers820gm Actually the 5.56 "massive wounding" is not a myth. If you fire a 5.56 out of a 20"+ barrel that has a high twist ratio to the rifling, the 5.56 will absolutely fuck any target up that it hits.
This is what the m16's of Vietnam did. The m16's of today have a much lower twist ratio to the rifling which makes the "massive wounding" of the 5.56 obsolete. This is because a low twist rate is accurate.
The 5.45 7n6 rolls, yaws, and tumbles regardless of barrel length or twist ratio.
corpralj3 2 months ago
@corpralj3 isnt it because the bullet tumbles right? It was clear the ak-74 was the winner between the AR and the AK-74. I shot both at a 8 inch piece of wood, and the damage from the 5.45x39 round was much nastier that the .223. The .223 made a clean hole...
naeverse 4 days ago
@Evilsnowman2213 I completely agree. Most Americans are too driven by patriotism to realise that AK's are better weapons than 5.56mm AR platforms.
TaZ101SAGA 10 months ago
@TaZ101SAGA speak for yourself.
japimportssuck 9 months ago
@japimportssuck Its not like Im lying.
TaZ101SAGA 9 months ago
U can obviously see the bullets are in the same general area... So all u fucks hlwho say AKs are inaccurate, u can suck my 7.62x39
ELITEWAFFLES9 11 months ago
@ELITEWAFFLES9 While I like AKs and recently got a Russian SKS, the AK-103 doesn't fire 7.62 and AK47s aren't this accurate, this AK probably fires 5.45 or 5.56 if I remember right. AKs were made for urban combat anyway who the fuck shoots at a building 1000 yards down the street? Lol
DystruktoBoi1 11 months ago
@DystruktoBoi1 Uhhh... sorry to burst your bubble... but the AK-103 fires the 7.62. I would also think that this a different AK model perhaps the 104 or 105 which shoot the 5.45 or 5.56.
FIREYOGUNZ4456 11 months ago
@FIREYOGUNZ4456 actually there were variations for most of them, u are right the AK-103 was strictly 7.62. I get my AKs mixed up with the newer ones, they have an AK101, AK102 etc.....up to an AK108. However they still only standard issue AK74's as the rest are still under research and development.
DystruktoBoi1 11 months ago
@DystruktoBoi1 nah its the 103 is in 7.62... and the AK was designed just as a general purpose weapon, not as an urban assault rifle. If Aks arent that accurate, than how do you explain those tracers hitting the same spot? Aks may not be as accurate as AR15s, but they arent actually that bad... put it in the hands of someone specially trained or just a good marksman, it can be very accurate. (experienced)
ELITEWAFFLES9 11 months ago
@ELITEWAFFLES9 The AK47 and AK74 and of course all guns based on them were made as "general purpose" weapons yes, but after world war 2 with the extreme new environment of urban combat fresh in the minds of the Russian military leaders, all guns made now are geared usually toward smaller, faster, more accurate and lighter, since most combat happens in towns and cities now. good example standard issue M14 and M16s in the open jungle combat of Vietnam, now we use mini 14s and M4 carbines.
DystruktoBoi1 11 months ago
@ELITEWAFFLES9 And yes I know my example was of American guns but that was one of the best examples I could think of, I'm not super familiar with too many other nations war history.
DystruktoBoi1 11 months ago
i woudl live to see the target
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
your all virgins
\/
\/
\/
kingbigdawg9 1 year ago
@kingbigdawg9 your name is under that ..
281rade281 1 year ago 7
@JukkAMoviE yea dude!! Suomi all the way. Those ryssät can suck our dicks. No homo :D
finndude2 1 year ago
Thats cool that a ak can pull that off good Rifleman above all tho the bullet drop must be shit haha.
GUNS4MIKE1234 1 year ago
@JAdO205 i agree but where is my ak 103, and psk hk , where is my JETPACK!
siz232 1 year ago
@JAdO205 and i can think of a decent number of people who wouldn't serve under the U.S. they don't want to serve uncle sam. they want your guns
siz232 1 year ago
@JAdO205 i agree to the first paragraph but second paragraph it basically retarded.
American can't afford ammo themself, they don't even make their own ammo anymore the chinese do. making you their bitch. Advanced technology does win the war you moron, if it didn't you ass would be kissing the german armies ass.
300 million americans? i don't think thats the number i saw in Census. americans .yeah no! your a mixed nation filled with europeans, asian,hispanic culture, polish,you name it
siz232 1 year ago
The best assault rifle in the world! :)
BritneyAddicted4EVA 1 year ago
nice shooting. how big was the target?
otacon451 1 year ago
That's remarkable. 1000 yard shot with an AK-103. Jeez man.
hex304 1 year ago
@JAdO205 On one hand you wouldn't nuke Sweden, the fallout would damage Europe and Russia (Russia might respond to this)
But yeah, Sweden has a military expenditure of virtually nil, and would never try their luck with anyone.
To JukkAMoviE, you are clearly deluded, want a fight, don't bother with the US, come to England, that way when your arse gets handed to you the walk, flight or sea voyage of shame will be much, much shorter.
Now go and eat some blueberry soup you bellend.
14th20thKRHkickass 1 year ago 8
@JAdO205 . I know you guys will fuck our country easy as hell , but before , Sweden was the biggest and greatest country in the world. We defeted every one and had the strongest army.. But then it all happend.. TECHNOLOGY.. In sweden we still are using old shit. I do now know cuz i'm with the swedish airforce. lol .
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE hahahaahhahahahahahhah,sweeden lmfao
GARTV101 1 year ago
If they could hold that camera as steady as the rifle they'd be golden.
zoetic12 1 year ago
@JAdO205 u do realize if anyone nuked anyone these days we would all die just saying
19meho95 1 year ago
@JAdO205 amen.
SasquatchLegend 1 year ago
who would have thought... sniping with an AK.
xenohacker 1 year ago
That's beautiful
nousername21 1 year ago
M43 necked down to 6.5mm (aka Grendel) would be 1000m cartridge ...but 7.62x39 is more like 500m cartridge because over 500m it loses speed rapidly
ww2footage 1 year ago
@andyhuangit totally agree
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@andyhuangit no, that's definitely a regular AK, the barrel isn't long enough for an RPK, just with a bipod
tearsinrain86 1 year ago
@andyhuangit
Yeah but that isn't what he is using, also the drop is more along the lines of 26 at 300 and at 500 you would have about 118 inches of drop, if you can compensate for the drop you can hit targets out to 1000 yards, also that is with standard FMJ's, if you are using something close to match ammo you will see those groupings tighten up.
acidburn134 1 year ago
Actually it starts dropping at 300 yards, but that doesn't mean the round isn't effective after that 300 yards.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@andyhuangit
HAHAHA I seriously hope you are kidding, and no look at the magazines buddy thatts a 7.62 AK, and no it isn't 20 inches off target at 50 yards, 7.62 is capable of submoa accuracy, thats less than an inch at 100 yards, with a 5 round grouping. And if you have optics hitting something at a 1000 yards is a bit easier, and he is using them.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@acidburn134 HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT, every body knows that the 7.63x30 cartidgre its not a good long range proyectile, it has a tremendus drop, and it loses a lot of energy after 200 mts (if you dont believe me watch the nutfancy specail "ar 15 vs ak 47"), hiting a target at 1000 mts its hard even with a bolt action sniper rifle, so is not that easy to do this with a assault rifle, where you get that stupid concepts from? some kind of videogame?
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a
No, it isn't good at long ranges and you are correct, at a thousand yards it is hard to hit something, it's not from video games but from ballistics tests, you can find many ballistics programmes, no its not the real thing, but its better than opinions, if you have an optic you can compensate for the drop. I don't need to watch nutnfancy to know these things, he has turned into a salesman.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@acidburn134 man even if you conpensate the drop of the bullet, the wind and the natural unaccuracy of the non flotable canon of that modificated ak 103 (note that the gas positon its disablen and they are using the rifle as a bolt action rifle) will make that shot a very hard one, a dn i know bu experience that the 7.63x39 its not very stable at long ranges...
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a
It's possible to do, and the rifle isn't modified much from it's original form, they gas tube is just not operational thus getting rid of the semi-automatic fire. Yes the 7.62x39 drop after 300 yards, but that doesn't mean it completely runs out of energy and falls to the ground, you need to compensate like 118 inches at 500 yards, I could be wrong but I can't use my ballistic calculator to check. 7.62 is capable of 1000 yard shots.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@acidburn134 IM not saiyng its imposible, but its hard, and the disable of the gas tube makes the weapons very accurated due to the lack of internal movements when its fired, just like a bolt action rifle, in fact they are firing a ak 103 bolt action rifle, and i think its using a rpd barrel, but i coudl be wrong
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a I'd say it's very possible as being proven on this video and no it's not some special barrel either. Though I know you looked at your AR and cried a little when you saw this video. AK reliability with 1000 meter hits! They are in Great Brittan. Semi-auto is illegal so they cut the gas piston off- hence he has to hand cycle it. That barrel is an original AK 103 barrel, not some RPK barrel. You would need a switch on your gas block just like the Yugo AK- to do the same thing.
mbsells77 1 year ago
@mbsells77 i have no guns, but i part of a shoting group (only .22 pistol and carabines are legal here) and let me tell you that movile parts afec accuracy considerably, even barrel armonics afect them, im not sayn the AK plataform its very unacurated, im just sayng that a shot like this its hard just like that
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a
No that isn't an RPK barrel, that is all AK-103, apart from the disabled gas-tube. Also the internal moving parts don't effect accuracy as much as people think, AR guys just use that to try to say the AK is very inaccurate when that isn't the case. There is no true AK bolt action rifle, apart from some that are made in pakistan. What you see in this video is very possible with an optic, as shown.
acidburn134 1 year ago
Comment removed
beethovenmetalhead 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a AR's suck.
mbsells77 1 year ago
@mbsells77 I Bought a Maadi AK47 in 2007 and loved it. It has never Jammed It is fairly accurate the ammo is cheap. I put a bit of money into it in a new stock rail etc. etc. In 2009 I bought and AR-15 Flat Top and I can tell you I can barely bring myself to fire that AK anymore. The AR is just as reliable way more accurate lighter and is just a better rifle. I was a big time AK fan boy until I bought that AR.
variable159 1 year ago
@andyhuangit
That is a 16" with a AK74 style brake to make it seem longer, and you can always replace the polymer with wood.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@andyhuangit
Nope it's an AK103.
acidburn134 1 year ago
hahaha tell the russian and the us army to use the .22lr in ww3 idiot how tha fuck you could be so stupid lol to say even to compare a 22 round against a round of an ak hahah your shitty round will penetrate shit in point blank when u have body armor hahaha and the spitball will slice your fucking body damn bro there u have it stop posting so dumb comments nothing against you but that wuz hilarious =)
SARAJEVO1987HORDEZLA 1 year ago
Just wondering why does he reload manually? Did he purposely block the gas system to ensure that all the gas is expended propelling bullet or to reduce the muzzle jump?
Spetsnazovets 1 year ago
1- This ain't an AK103
2-Bolt lenght and cases are definitely 7.62 x 54 R , not 39.
TheBelva85 1 year ago
@TheBelva85 ..dead wrong
petritnikqi 1 year ago
@petritnikqi Try to base what you're saying over some facts. Thx.
TheBelva85 1 year ago
@TheBelva85 and the magazine aswell
petritnikqi 1 year ago
@petritnikqi What are you talking about? Try to prove a point.
TheBelva85 1 year ago
@TheBelva85
Look at the size of the ejected shells. That isn't 54R.
acidburn134 1 year ago
@acidburn134 How do u say that? But well it might be 39.
TheBelva85 1 year ago
@TheBelva85
Look at the magazines. Clear give away.
acidburn134 1 year ago
It might have an iron sight marked to 1000m but the shooter had a scope and one would need one also to be effective. I'm not knocking AKs, I love 'em.
jaoshuu 1 year ago
Most AK shooting videos are not past 50 yards so it's nice to see someone try some long range stuff with a scope. Even though we never see any targets or hits.
bllw69 1 year ago
maybe you think that bullet wont hurt you...but it will fuck you up...i have to say sorry about US propaganda...dude you can kill someone with .308 up to 1600m..and with ak 1000...my opinion..the bullet ETA is moderate not so fast... 3 seconds...but for a rifle like the ak is pretty fast...human skull is as thin as a light bulb... it will kill you ...i think so..what..you think .223 will kill you at 1000m.. cmon...
would you stay as a target in that distance in front of ak...tell me
petritnikqi 1 year ago
i have a long barreled ak-47..maybe longer than tabuk..i dont know where the hell is made..it looks like chinese type-56...but it doesnt have a stamp or something..i more think its an albanian type..direct copy from chinese but the barrel is long as fuck...i have never tried shooting at long range..but i'll do it..penetrates a 60 cm pine tree without any problem...
petritnikqi 1 year ago
that sucks they dont let you have one that cycles itself. probably would help accuracy a bit.
tcbat711 1 year ago
@tcbat711 you mean a semi-auto, and nope, bolt-actions are the choice of snipers because they are more accurate.
mosomos89 1 year ago
@mosomos89 @mosomos89 Yeah I wrote that wrong. I've heard that Gas Impingement is just as or close to as accurate as bolt gun too.
tcbat711 1 year ago
Are these 16inch barrels?
knowthetruth1492 1 year ago
arghh!!!..i cant run from this sniper weapon...:(
XdragonX56 1 year ago
@JAdO205
well. who gives a damn. When Aliens will attack us , Sweden will be the leading country cuz of the technology. We will be able to shoot them dowm with a 10000000000billiontrillionBilliwatt laser.. but who cares.. both countrys are against terrorism and such,,., but still.. i dont like america ;) but thats just my opinion :) hehe
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JAdO205 well.. yeah.. BUT. Swedish army have MUCH better technology then america have.. that make us smarter. If you guys had the same tec as we do, america would probly be undefeatebly.. but , thats just one reason that America dont dare to do anything to us in the nordic countries.. we have submarines that no one can spot and we have the strongest weapons and tanks , and airplanes.. we would defeat your country in 5 hours and russia would come with us and denmark, finland och norwigen.. FU
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE Vast strategic nuclear arsenal as well as the means to deploy them anywhere in the world at any time of our choosing.
Jrhoney 1 year ago
@Jrhoney
Haha what a joke. You guys are only fat and stupid. America are voted nr1 for the most fatest country in the world. and tell me.. you guys only have fat in your brian. and your ppl even hate them self " God hate america " hahah.. that i call stupid AND you have a fucking nigger as a president!?!?!? HAHAHA.. i almost laught my ass of me when i heard.. you guys are SO fucking domed. he are gonna kill all of you white boys
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE first off, i didn't vote for the commie bastard. Secondly, I love my country, it has been good to me and my family and I can do pretty much what I want.
As for being a fat nation, well I cant be responsible for other lazy losers. I'm a trim 200 at 6 feet (thats 2m for you) I can do a 20 miles a day in the mountains with a full pack and rifle. I take care of myself.
Jrhoney 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE
And as for those God hates America bunch, fuck em. They are ungrateful sacks of shit on the same level of "Hanoi" Jane Fonda. They're entitled to their opinions and I'm entitled to think they are retards.
Jrhoney 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE we are the fastest country because we dont eat shit like you
akshooter762 1 year ago
@akshooter762 your all arguing about some really stupid ass shit
TheDarkDrums 1 year ago
@akshooter762 Lol wtf!?. America eat the most shit in the world. Thats why you all are so fat.. omg.. i dont think you live in the real USA
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE lol yeah i live in the usa and im not fat... im pretty sure u weigh more than i do lol
akshooter762 1 year ago
@akshooter762 Im sure i weigh more then you yes cuz im older and are lifting weighs ever day and do all kind of trainings.
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE Were not all bad guys, its just we have a lot of people stuck living in towns with no communication to the real outside world. The landmass is so big, it unfortunately breeds ignorance. Im sorry if a fellow american offended you, i like sweden. U guys are smart, and ur Snus is great. Cheers!
sgohara 1 year ago
@sgohara Great :). Snus is great ,yes :). cheeers
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE fuck you faggot america can own guns unlike your country dick face. america has much better technology than your country
GARTV101 1 year ago
@GARTV101
Even though I'm from Northern Ireland I thought I'd just say that isn't a strictly fair point, by size and population, America is huge by comparison to most countries, so comparing the two isn't exactly fair. Like saying my aeroplane will beat your skoda in a race.
O1Chris02 1 year ago
@GARTV101 first of all. i dont even know what the fuck you just wrote. Second of all. I dont give a damn. 3 of all. YOU dont even know a shit. A little 19 years old faggot. In sweden we can own all kind of weapons to. AND the technology is the same as rest in the world. I suggest that you go to school , skip WoW , skip suck justin biebers cock and then stop fuck yourself with a buttplugg. After you done that, feel free to write to me again , and ill own you ass again with letters. Be afraid.
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE in my country's point of view, we wouldn't serve with the U.S. You just decided to jump in WWII and take full credit for entering europe. yeah you .america took down japan. thats rit japan and almost lost. if they hadn't deployed op. little boy you would have been taken over.you had all your sweet time to create the bomb noone invaded america.
siz232 1 year ago
@siz232 Hahaha!!. What the fuck are you talking about!?. HAHAHAH.... stupid fucking fat american!!
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE first of all im not fat to begin with your dumbass bulimica nervosa mind bring the picture that americans are fat.
second i'm not american i'm russian you retared as swedeish cock sucker.
so shut the fuck up . motherfucking retarded. your country is smart not your dumbass
siz232 1 year ago
@siz232 First of all, i'am not from fucking sweden, i'am from finland, and second of all, you russian fags have already proven that your country is the faggiest stupidest country in the world. Your army sucks, you are poor as hell, no real civilization nor water, and finland will fuck your country again as we did in ww2, fucking fag communist.
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE ahahahahahahaha XD a finnish brother pissed!!! lololll
titaniumomega 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE Cut the bullshit...Don't act like douchebags both of you.
divinegod102 1 year ago
sick scope dude :D
TheScorchedOne 1 year ago
Most ppl assume 400m is the maximum range of 7.62x39mm when thats actually its maximum "effective range" meaning the range at which you get a reliable grouping not the range at which the round runs out of kinetic energy.
MacMeaties 1 year ago
looks more like a dragunov
davidmarino96 2 years ago
none of you are right
british titans all the way
namybot 2 years ago
So what thank you for showing these people that a AK can it the 1000 yard mark, I love the rifle.
AKxALLxDAYx 2 years ago
1000 yds is too much even for SVD (russian marksman rifle) Effective range of AK is 400 yds (SVD - 600 yds). For 1000-1500 yds distances russians use AVSK sniper rifle.
MrJohnRyder 2 years ago
how jealous must uk gun owners be of the u.s...
hangfeatphil 2 years ago
Why does he have to cycle the rifle on every shot? Isn't it a full-auto with semi select rifle? BTW, I don't think (even on calm, windless day) that an ak cartridge could be accurate out to 1,000 yds but a realistic range for it would be more like 300 yards at best. At 400-yds, the ak cartridge drops is right around +60"; so if this guy trying to hit something that far (1,000-yds) with the ak cartridge then he must aim for the sky and hope that the trajectory will guide the round into the target
RotApple0 2 years ago
When shooting at that range with that kind of gun he needs all the accuracy he can get, and a piston flinging back at him is not going to help one bit. I believe those variants have a gas cut off switch, but he may have simply taken the piston rod out......and wallah you have a pull back bolt action....
olchevyman 2 years ago
The UK banned semi-auto rifles (not sure about handguns) some time ago, so the rifles need to be single fire... pretty stupid law, in my opinion. And I agree with you, 1,000 yards is just too much for the average shooter/soldier.
Eudo1965 2 years ago
sucks to be you....I invite you to move to the usa and out of that stankin dump!
warriorofsteel01 2 years ago
honestly, average russian or chinese soldier will not have the marksmanship skills to even hit something 1000 yards away.
mfairtap 2 years ago
You presume too much, Russian & Chinese soldier's are very well trained these day's, most likely there on par with NATO troop's.
kingsman565 2 years ago
i am russian i've been to the army and i must disagree with u in 2 years time i shot 4 times i mean 4 magazines ( in 2 years) if it makes me axperienced then we have the most expirienced army in the world
zlo333 2 years ago 2
Relly? I'm suprised to hear you say that my friend. The Chinese PLA has come along way in the last few decades though.
kingsman565 2 years ago
The Russians yeah but the chinese, I don't know man. They don't even have enough weapons to provide the entire military. They still have people equipped with the SKS.
Tippet76 2 years ago
Well maby, If you look for any PLA video here on youtube they look pretty well equiped but then again they would want to give the impression that every chinese soldier is trained & equiped to the same standerd as the US wouldn't they? Guess we won't know for shure until the big one, as they say the proof of the budding is in the eating.
kingsman565 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ha yeah thats why half of the russian troops in georiga ran away
golfisgreat123 2 years ago
i agree with u , but if we have war with america, neither u or us gonna have average soldiers . hope we gonna have peace forever -)
zlo333 2 years ago 2
Honestly average anyone is not going to hit targets that far away....I do long range shooting on a regular basis anywhere from 800m-1400m but it is with my .308 remington......with my ak I can realistically hit a human sized target out to 300m max any further it is hit or miss, Im talking off hand here.
olchevyman 2 years ago
the russians train their soldiers better than the americans.
rustaayy 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
thats what you think..
damn commie
mfairtap 2 years ago
And that is what you think, damn yankee
rustaayy 2 years ago 11
LOL, what is so great about Russian training?
Have you ever been to Russia?
Their facilities are piss poor, and half of the drill sergeants are just closeted homosexual sadists.
damarei 1 year ago
@damarei funny because i trained there from the age of 19 it there where so much homosexuals why did we all have wifes coming to work pissed off at husbands cheating on other woman. if were so piss ass poor then america is shit ass poor.
because your borrowing such a large amount of money from the chinese.
siz232 1 year ago
@siz232
LOL, Putin just signed an agreement to trade against the Chinese currency, you uneducated, uninformed douche.
damarei 1 year ago
@mfairtap stfu you stupid fukin read neck who the fuk still says commie
siz232 1 year ago
@rustaayy yes. yes they do. and they have better guns too
PS3WPRODUCTIONS 2 years ago
@rustaayy
yeah that true.. even sweden has much better army and technology. But tell me, who doesnt hate america?. they sucks they are only overpowerd cuz they have like 100000 kids in the army and then 10000 niggers that only trying to make some rap music.. in sweden we have only good ppl. good technology and good everything :D
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE k buddy you mad cause GM took SAAB from you guys and we do carry the best technology,.
annis0201 1 year ago
@annis0201
HAHA. GM dident took saab.. spyker did and its the best cuz saab fucking sucks
JukkAMoviE 1 year ago
LOL!
Go make some chocolate and do my banking, you lady boy
damarei 1 year ago
@JukkAMoviE have to disagree man. the swedish army hasn't involved in thermonuclear wars since 61' your country doesn't even place top 50
siz232 1 year ago
@rustaayy true man your a smart motherfucker
siz232 1 year ago
how come they have a bolt-action wooden furniture UK-Legal rifle and say it is an ak103
A15KaldrinJAB 2 years ago
Not bolt, just single fire
xiMenacex 2 years ago
the 7,62x39 bullet has enought energy to kill a man from 1500m. This is the max for this round. on an ak it would be less on a sniper rifle it would be more but the max is 1500m. the 223 max dist is 1000m. the point is if you know how to calculate your tragectory you can shoot with an ak between 600-1000m
beethovenmetalhead 2 years ago 3
good luck hitting something at that range.
hondamx518 2 years ago
EHM the AK100series got all rifle calibre
AK107 2 years ago 3
ok lets talk about this one to at that distance weight plays main role shooting 7.62x39mm and hitting target 1000m will make double penetration then .223(5.56mm) so then if you go and look charts about bullet losing it`s elevation and drops from sky that will not effect bullets killing ability so like i said more weight more energy at long distance
sonne0ne 2 years ago
not necessarily the bullet weight means all the difference.....at 1000 m the 7.62x39 is going a hella of a lot slower then your standard .223 round you have to factor in that weight and powder charge more weight means bigger powder charge ratio and frankly most ak rounds do not have that lethality capability
robert02109REO 2 years ago
robert02109REO......what have you been using....like 50 year old surplus 7.62x39mm? anything that falls out of the sky will regain it's energy given enough height. the AK round will kill any human even if it came from a mortar-like path from the sky.
adrianrubi 2 years ago
falling objects if all kinetic energy is lost fall at the same constant speed which is less then the velocity needed for a round to kill someone....yes it is true if you fire off a barrage of bullets "mortar like" in the direction of someone yes maybe one of there bullets will have some kinetic energy left but if you are following proper shooting principles then the 2 miles rules is in affect rendering most rifle rounds as ineffective including the 7.62x39
robert02109REO 2 years ago