New Hampshire was RIGGED! VOTES STOLEN FROM RON PAUL!!
They didn't even allow Ron Paul to tie Guiliani. Everytime he came close to tying him, Guiliani gets a "boost" of a couple hundred votes, maintaining himself at 9%, and Ron Paul at 8%.
non transparent voting system...what a huge slap in the face to the american people...are you guys even awake!!!how many slaps can you people take?honestly,even 3rd world countries know how to give their dishonest politicians the boot..americans should be breaking their foot off in this governments ass! just curious...foreign owned companies controling your untransparent vote how does that make you feel? crazy with anger,hopeless,or what!
If the whistleblower was involved then they are just as guilty.
I do want to point out that it doesn't really matter if the elections are rigged as we haven't had a government for the people by the people and of the people in my entire life (26 years) to my knowledge. Show me one person in office that really represents the average american. Please, these people are so disconnected they wouldn't know who the common person was if they walked up and slapped them in the face.
If given unlimited time, any security system can be overcome. However, in reality, where I live, these voting machines and the way they are handled preclude the kind of hacking you describe. You also have forgotten that the poll workers would notice anomalies from the typical voting pattens in their precinct. You are welcome to prove your conspiracy theory by hacking Henrico voting machines. We have an election on February 12, 2008 so you had better get busy.
Also, take a moment to read the wikipedia article on SAIC, the organization which formulates the security protocols and dictates them to all state boards of elections. Study the types of contracts SAIC works on typically and the number of intelligence agents in the company's leadership. The fact that looking the code is illegal and the fact that you could easily get a receipt but its purposely designed to deny the voter a receipt makes it more like basic common sense than any type of "theory."
The problem is explained in HBO's "Hacking Democracy". Do a you tube search I know it's on here. In 2000 Al gore had -16,000 vote which proves it was in fact hacked and government has lied to us. We have a serious problem in this country.
Jtyler thinks that election workers would need to be involved or that the cards or printouts aren't the RESULTS of malicious code. Our machines are absolutely rigged. Watch Princeton exposes diebold flaws on Youtube.
There is no tamper proof voting system, but the computer system that i have worked with is much more secure than paper ballots. One added level of security that has been proposed is to have each person get a paper receipt. This raises the problem of voters falsifying receipts or being pressured by union bosses to reveal their votes. I would like the receipt to be an option.
We can ASSUME that they are RIGGED BECAUSE we get no receipt. There is no other conceivable reason to not get a receipt. You get a receipt when you take 20 bucks out of an ATM. There is NO EXCUSE to not receive a receipt and the fact that we are not getting one means it is VERY safe to assume the 4 companies that make the machines that handle 80% of our nations votes are RIGGED.
Malicious code can erase itself leaving no trace and be set off by a timer for the election says it all. The fact that with paper ballots there are REAL ballots that don't destroy themselves automatically leaving no trace makes paper ballots way more dangerous and difficult to dispose of with no witnesses. Then the polling employees would HAVE to be IN ON IT. With rigged machines, just a few people could rig the whole nation with latent source code which is illegal to look at.
Part three: The computer system is more secure than the paper ballot. It would be easier to dump fake paper ballots into boxes than to hide computer code and such code would somehow have to find its way onto thousands of machines without a trace. Tthe scenario presented in the testimony would be defeated by the checks already in place in Henrico. You would have to compromise hundreds of poll workers to pull something like this hypothetical scenario off.
the code is entered before the poll workers get to the machines. SAIC tells state boards how to test and how not to test machines. Watch "princeton exposes diebold flaws." This is not only realistic but probable. All you have to do is Wiki SAIC and see who they are and what they do. They are an NWO homeland security corporation run by spooks who partner with Bechtel. That's all you need to know really. The fact that you get no receipt pretty much guarantees a rigged election.
Part two: Before the poll workers are dismissed and the vote count reported, the paper tape and computer totals must match the total number of voters who voted that day. Once the votes are totaled, the tapes and flash drives are sealed in containers. The voting computers are sealed in a locked container and the State Board of elections officials are given the keys and the vote tapes. (I'll post a third part to this)
Part One: I have worked at polls in Florida, Virginia, California and Louisiana. Most recently, I worked at a poll in Henrico County Virginia, where we used computer based voting machines. The computers are delivered in locked containers to each site. The computers have a paper tape and a flash memory stick. At the conclusion of voting, the flash memory stick is pulled and the paper tape printed out that reveals the vote count for each machine. (I'll Post a second part to this)
"The computers are delivered in locked containers to each site"
Sure... and they were delivered -from- somewhere in the first place... and they were placed in the containers by someone. As another poster has stated, go watch "Hacking Democracy".
Watch "Princeton exposes Diebold flaws" on Youtube. Both the paper printout and the flash record will display the false data after malicious code is previously entered. The module based malicious code is set to disappear itself, eat itself immediately after the voting.
YEA i AM FORWARDING THIS TO EVERYONE i KNOW IN FLORIDA AND WE NEED IT BEFORE THE PRIMARY'S, HELL I'LL COUNT BALLOTS IF I HAVE TO! EVERYONE SHOULD OFFER TO DO THE SAME!
: ) good job...ty for the video.
WikiLeaksTUBE 3 months ago
Let's post this everywhere on Youtube. It needs more views 849 at this time, no way is this enough!
nvsyru 4 years ago
Download, then upload the video yourselves with metatags more appropriate to the content such as the following metatag words..
Bush, McCain, Kerry, Conspiracy, criminal, voting, 911, lies, hidden, agenda, illuminati, corruption, americans, lied, to
..And so on...
jayc2469 3 years ago
Is he still alive?
coopercussion 4 years ago
Yup :)
Kinjamaimai 4 years ago
588 views since November 2007? - Yeah fucking right!
YouTube is going down the drain... slowly turning into FoxTube and CNNTube. I knew things would turn ugly once they were bought out by Google.
ImyManz99 4 years ago
New Hampshire was RIGGED! VOTES STOLEN FROM RON PAUL!!
They didn't even allow Ron Paul to tie Guiliani. Everytime he came close to tying him, Guiliani gets a "boost" of a couple hundred votes, maintaining himself at 9%, and Ron Paul at 8%.
ImyManz99 4 years ago
non transparent voting system...what a huge slap in the face to the american people...are you guys even awake!!!how many slaps can you people take?honestly,even 3rd world countries know how to give their dishonest politicians the boot..americans should be breaking their foot off in this governments ass! just curious...foreign owned companies controling your untransparent vote how does that make you feel? crazy with anger,hopeless,or what!
rufknkidnme 4 years ago
Diebold keys can be bought on ebay see this post freedom-to-tinker DOT com/?p=1064
Why would Diebold not secure it's software are their IT guys that stupid? You can encode software.
1k9lvr 4 years ago
this is the only way this info is getting out the main stream media has barried this story! EMAIL THIS TO EVERYONE!
voteDRNO 4 years ago
SO I guess this guy thinks of himself as a hero now??? i think he's shit! He was shit when he helped them do it... Now he needs Solace???
FUCK HIM..String him up too!
dianeliebowitz 4 years ago
Yeah, just like the neocons kill the whistleblower.
imnos482 4 years ago
If the whistleblower was involved then they are just as guilty.
I do want to point out that it doesn't really matter if the elections are rigged as we haven't had a government for the people by the people and of the people in my entire life (26 years) to my knowledge. Show me one person in office that really represents the average american. Please, these people are so disconnected they wouldn't know who the common person was if they walked up and slapped them in the face.
zakneifien 4 years ago
My God.
RonPauladvocate 4 years ago
If given unlimited time, any security system can be overcome. However, in reality, where I live, these voting machines and the way they are handled preclude the kind of hacking you describe. You also have forgotten that the poll workers would notice anomalies from the typical voting pattens in their precinct. You are welcome to prove your conspiracy theory by hacking Henrico voting machines. We have an election on February 12, 2008 so you had better get busy.
JTylerBallance 4 years ago
You really need to watch "princeton exposes diebold flaws." You really do. It only takes 10 minutes. Well worth it.
blahinhawaii 4 years ago
Also, take a moment to read the wikipedia article on SAIC, the organization which formulates the security protocols and dictates them to all state boards of elections. Study the types of contracts SAIC works on typically and the number of intelligence agents in the company's leadership. The fact that looking the code is illegal and the fact that you could easily get a receipt but its purposely designed to deny the voter a receipt makes it more like basic common sense than any type of "theory."
blahinhawaii 4 years ago
Testing 1 2
madinhorrycounty 4 years ago
To JTylerBallance,
1st-
The problem is explained in HBO's "Hacking Democracy". Do a you tube search I know it's on here. In 2000 Al gore had -16,000 vote which proves it was in fact hacked and government has lied to us. We have a serious problem in this country.
1k9lvr 4 years ago
Jtyler thinks that election workers would need to be involved or that the cards or printouts aren't the RESULTS of malicious code. Our machines are absolutely rigged. Watch Princeton exposes diebold flaws on Youtube.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
There is no tamper proof voting system, but the computer system that i have worked with is much more secure than paper ballots. One added level of security that has been proposed is to have each person get a paper receipt. This raises the problem of voters falsifying receipts or being pressured by union bosses to reveal their votes. I would like the receipt to be an option.
JTylerBallance 4 years ago
We can ASSUME that they are RIGGED BECAUSE we get no receipt. There is no other conceivable reason to not get a receipt. You get a receipt when you take 20 bucks out of an ATM. There is NO EXCUSE to not receive a receipt and the fact that we are not getting one means it is VERY safe to assume the 4 companies that make the machines that handle 80% of our nations votes are RIGGED.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
Malicious code can erase itself leaving no trace and be set off by a timer for the election says it all. The fact that with paper ballots there are REAL ballots that don't destroy themselves automatically leaving no trace makes paper ballots way more dangerous and difficult to dispose of with no witnesses. Then the polling employees would HAVE to be IN ON IT. With rigged machines, just a few people could rig the whole nation with latent source code which is illegal to look at.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
Part three: The computer system is more secure than the paper ballot. It would be easier to dump fake paper ballots into boxes than to hide computer code and such code would somehow have to find its way onto thousands of machines without a trace. Tthe scenario presented in the testimony would be defeated by the checks already in place in Henrico. You would have to compromise hundreds of poll workers to pull something like this hypothetical scenario off.
JTylerBallance 4 years ago
the code is entered before the poll workers get to the machines. SAIC tells state boards how to test and how not to test machines. Watch "princeton exposes diebold flaws." This is not only realistic but probable. All you have to do is Wiki SAIC and see who they are and what they do. They are an NWO homeland security corporation run by spooks who partner with Bechtel. That's all you need to know really. The fact that you get no receipt pretty much guarantees a rigged election.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
Part two: Before the poll workers are dismissed and the vote count reported, the paper tape and computer totals must match the total number of voters who voted that day. Once the votes are totaled, the tapes and flash drives are sealed in containers. The voting computers are sealed in a locked container and the State Board of elections officials are given the keys and the vote tapes. (I'll post a third part to this)
JTylerBallance 4 years ago
Part One: I have worked at polls in Florida, Virginia, California and Louisiana. Most recently, I worked at a poll in Henrico County Virginia, where we used computer based voting machines. The computers are delivered in locked containers to each site. The computers have a paper tape and a flash memory stick. At the conclusion of voting, the flash memory stick is pulled and the paper tape printed out that reveals the vote count for each machine. (I'll Post a second part to this)
JTylerBallance 4 years ago
"The computers are delivered in locked containers to each site"
Sure... and they were delivered -from- somewhere in the first place... and they were placed in the containers by someone. As another poster has stated, go watch "Hacking Democracy".
chubstheclown 4 years ago
Watch "Princeton exposes Diebold flaws" on Youtube. Both the paper printout and the flash record will display the false data after malicious code is previously entered. The module based malicious code is set to disappear itself, eat itself immediately after the voting.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
It only becomes active DURING the election, on a timer, so testing for it gives the very FALSE impression that it's working fine.
majorityrules07 4 years ago
more people need to see this...you should post this a video response to other related videos...you'll get more coverage
mike6459 4 years ago
there is a chance this will happen again..this is why the US has to go back to paper ballots
mike6459 4 years ago
YEA i AM FORWARDING THIS TO EVERYONE i KNOW IN FLORIDA AND WE NEED IT BEFORE THE PRIMARY'S, HELL I'LL COUNT BALLOTS IF I HAVE TO! EVERYONE SHOULD OFFER TO DO THE SAME!
1k9lvr 4 years ago
yeah.. i know this vid. Some people know that the vote in Florida was stolen by Bush.
gabriellus021 4 years ago