Citing someone else's logical fallacy is not a behavior of a one trick pony. It is important to avoid obvious logical fallacies like the ones you pointed out because they are vulnerable to refutations. When someone uses a fallacy, it shows the opponent that you don't have a strong grasp on the material, or worse, that you lack credibility to debate. Parables are nice, however, they tend to paint with too broad a brush when dealing with specific claims in a scientific debate.
@eddygoombah What I read from you comment is you just saying citing fallacies, it's not a one trick pony & then giving no defense for it, no reasoning, no persuasion, no examples, all you did was move on to explain the importance of knowing fallacies, & say hard science needs more then parables. Did you know Einstein said if you can't explain your theory to bar tender, then you don't have one. He sighted his ability to make complex ideas into analogies or drawlings was his strongest suit.
@miking193 when one makes a logical fallacy, don't yell at the person calling them out. If your argument had any merit at all, you wouldn't need to rely on fallacy to present them. As stated before, citing logical fallacy is an important tool used in debate. It quickly cuts through vulnerable refutations by those who have a weak gasp of the topic at hand. Stop trying to suggest differently. It's not helping you.
@eddygoombah I don't think you understand what I was talking about. My point was that someone tried to cry fallacy, fallacy, even when it wasn't applicable. Why because their way of communicating with others was a one trick pony, they were not able to explain themselves to others, anyway else. If one has a good grasp of the content they're discussing, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to talk about it in multiple ways, not just fallacy, fallacy. You didn't address any other points I used.
Citing someone else's logical fallacy is not a behavior of a one trick pony. It is important to avoid obvious logical fallacies like the ones you pointed out because they are vulnerable to refutations. When someone uses a fallacy, it shows the opponent that you don't have a strong grasp on the material, or worse, that you lack credibility to debate. Parables are nice, however, they tend to paint with too broad a brush when dealing with specific claims in a scientific debate.
eddygoombah 1 year ago
@eddygoombah What I read from you comment is you just saying citing fallacies, it's not a one trick pony & then giving no defense for it, no reasoning, no persuasion, no examples, all you did was move on to explain the importance of knowing fallacies, & say hard science needs more then parables. Did you know Einstein said if you can't explain your theory to bar tender, then you don't have one. He sighted his ability to make complex ideas into analogies or drawlings was his strongest suit.
miking193 1 year ago
@miking193 when one makes a logical fallacy, don't yell at the person calling them out. If your argument had any merit at all, you wouldn't need to rely on fallacy to present them. As stated before, citing logical fallacy is an important tool used in debate. It quickly cuts through vulnerable refutations by those who have a weak gasp of the topic at hand. Stop trying to suggest differently. It's not helping you.
eddygoombah 1 year ago
@eddygoombah I don't think you understand what I was talking about. My point was that someone tried to cry fallacy, fallacy, even when it wasn't applicable. Why because their way of communicating with others was a one trick pony, they were not able to explain themselves to others, anyway else. If one has a good grasp of the content they're discussing, I don't see why they wouldn't be able to talk about it in multiple ways, not just fallacy, fallacy. You didn't address any other points I used.
miking193 1 year ago
: )
ilove2draw1 1 year ago
bro i dont know who is that guy you're talking about,
LOL @ the location choice for preaching!
your dog on 0:37 trying to get out of puddle - priceless )))
may Jesus bless you
kaykane 1 year ago