The bush policies increased the debt by 7 trillion dollars, Obama less then 2.5 trillion, instead of liking something you see on youtube that is neatly brought to you with nice flashy graphics look up the facts. Check out the CBO and fact check. This is propoganda paid for by some pac. The debt is not to be blamed on "obama and the democrats" if you want reality the debts biggest contributors were republicans and republican policies. <FACT dont believe me? google is your friend and pacs are not.
Has everyone forgot about the GFC and the 15 years of unsustained growth? This is isn't going away overnight people. Using a scapegoat to futilely compensate for one's own difficulties during a financially volatile period-is just plain short sightness.
@MrBigMoneyMan909 Really? You're only going to give Obama one term to fix a problem that Bush created with eight years in office and two wars? Somehow that doesn't make sense.
@TheReedBeeley well I respect that statement but look at Regan he fixed the economy by cutting taxes to stimulate the economy but Obama is doing the opposite but spending trillions of dollars increasing the deficit raising the debt, and the taxes to pacify his spending addiction. What Obama should do if he wants any hope of a second term in office is open his presidential history book and look up 'Reganomics' and follow it word for word because this country is headed towards economic collapse!!
@MrBigMoneyMan909 Thank you for seeing my point. I appreciate that. However, I would like to point Reagan had a recession in his administration. When Clinton came into office, he wanted to give tax breaks (remember that famous phrase "it's the economy, stupid"), however Greenspan wouldn't let him. Under Clinton's (or rather Greenspan's) tax policy we enjoyed the greatest period of economic boom since the 50s.
@TheReedBeeley Your welcome and yes Reagan did have a recession and Clinton really helped fix the economy and most economic statistics we at an all time best and I agree with you but with all due respect the main topic of discussion is the Obama administration and what he has done. For example Obama should be impeached because he has committed high treason, don't believe me look up this URL which I will post in the next reply
@TheReedBeeley actually I will send the URL in a PM cause it will not submit, so read the article.
Okay you read the article, now since Obama is heading the security council of the United Nations that means that Article 1 section 9 paragraph 8 of the United States Constitution says something that is too long to put in here and will be left in another reply
@TheReedBeeley Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 says: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." and I will send the explained version in another PM
Ron Paul 2012! Join the R[evol]ution!
lb8825 6 months ago
@lb8825 0:26 stanley kubrick 1980 ?
jutubaeh 6 days ago
The bush policies increased the debt by 7 trillion dollars, Obama less then 2.5 trillion, instead of liking something you see on youtube that is neatly brought to you with nice flashy graphics look up the facts. Check out the CBO and fact check. This is propoganda paid for by some pac. The debt is not to be blamed on "obama and the democrats" if you want reality the debts biggest contributors were republicans and republican policies. <FACT dont believe me? google is your friend and pacs are not.
BryantTheTyrant 7 months ago
Has everyone forgot about the GFC and the 15 years of unsustained growth? This is isn't going away overnight people. Using a scapegoat to futilely compensate for one's own difficulties during a financially volatile period-is just plain short sightness.
roguemale57 7 months ago
The part with the sun....did she say $1,000 dollars bills?? I wonder how many times it could do that with $100.
PoPadopulas79 7 months ago
@PoPadopulas79 Obviously 10x as much, so 70 trips instead of 7.
Jimb0tr0n 7 months ago
this is so right Obama is destroying this country we need him out of office NOW or the country will economically collapse
MrBigMoneyMan909 7 months ago
@MrBigMoneyMan909 Really? You're only going to give Obama one term to fix a problem that Bush created with eight years in office and two wars? Somehow that doesn't make sense.
Reed Beeley
TheReedBeeley 6 months ago
@TheReedBeeley well I respect that statement but look at Regan he fixed the economy by cutting taxes to stimulate the economy but Obama is doing the opposite but spending trillions of dollars increasing the deficit raising the debt, and the taxes to pacify his spending addiction. What Obama should do if he wants any hope of a second term in office is open his presidential history book and look up 'Reganomics' and follow it word for word because this country is headed towards economic collapse!!
MrBigMoneyMan909 6 months ago
@MrBigMoneyMan909 Thank you for seeing my point. I appreciate that. However, I would like to point Reagan had a recession in his administration. When Clinton came into office, he wanted to give tax breaks (remember that famous phrase "it's the economy, stupid"), however Greenspan wouldn't let him. Under Clinton's (or rather Greenspan's) tax policy we enjoyed the greatest period of economic boom since the 50s.
Thanks for listening,
Reed Beeley
TheReedBeeley 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrBigMoneyMan909 6 months ago
@TheReedBeeley Your welcome and yes Reagan did have a recession and Clinton really helped fix the economy and most economic statistics we at an all time best and I agree with you but with all due respect the main topic of discussion is the Obama administration and what he has done. For example Obama should be impeached because he has committed high treason, don't believe me look up this URL which I will post in the next reply
MrBigMoneyMan909 6 months ago
@TheReedBeeley actually I will send the URL in a PM cause it will not submit, so read the article.
Okay you read the article, now since Obama is heading the security council of the United Nations that means that Article 1 section 9 paragraph 8 of the United States Constitution says something that is too long to put in here and will be left in another reply
MrBigMoneyMan909 6 months ago
@TheReedBeeley Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8 says: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State." and I will send the explained version in another PM
MrBigMoneyMan909 6 months ago
And Ronald Reagan and the 2 Bushes reduced the debt???
Two-headed one-party system.
GreatInca 7 months ago
It'll be too late by the time 2012 comes around. That's another year and a half of damage he can do.
Yakko77 7 months ago 2
Where can I get a transporter beam?
happymax1 7 months ago
Haven't we already seen this?
Nixmix24 7 months ago