Added: 4 years ago
From: EpiphanyProductions
Views: 370,482
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,492)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • WHO HAS A PLANE? LETS GO TAKE SAMPLES!!!

  • Dieser Fokus auf Banalitäten solcher Berichte ist ein Skandal. Es ist doch unwichtig wieviel genau an Schwermetallen in die Luft gelangen! Wichtig ist nur das man dies überhaupt tut! Denn es ist eine öffentliche Gefährdung der Gesundheit da unser Körper nicht in der Lage ist Schwermetalle auf herkömmliche Art auszuscheiden und sogar die Hirnblutschranke durchbrechen. Hier zu behaupten man kennt die gesundheitlichen Auswirkungen nicht ist schlicht und ergreifend gelogen.

  • THE TRANSLATION IS WRONG FROM THE START TO THE END.

    He just added some things which weren't metioned at all and others were just left out. Most of the translation is pure and simple fantasy.

    This video is bullshit.

  • To state that the translation is wrong from start to end is an exaggeration. But yeah, it does contain some mistakes. I don't care so much about what they call the stuff, chemtrail/chaff. They're friggin dumping it on eastern Netherland. Hundsrug(de Hondsrug) is not in Germany, it's where I grew up and my family still lives. I wonder if they had a permit and who the person was that gave it. I'd guess it was some stupid Hollander from Den Hague without ties to that area.

  • CHEMTRAIL PILOOOOT!!!!!!

    DU BIST EIN IDIOOOOOOT!!!!!!!!!

    DU WIRST STERBENNNN!!!!!! FÜR VERLOGENE PAROLEN!!!!!!!!!!!.....oder so...

  • Hi there, great video !!!

    Is there a similar video with scientific evidence about chemtrails made by non military airoplanes?

    Also i would like to add that

    a) Olgacom scandal. Now everything belongs to mongol-china, as monsanto, GMOs

    b) Agenda21 that talks about chemtrails and population reduction

    c) Human Genome Contaminated With Mycoplasma DNA because of chemtrails

  • Its easy to split the 2 sides here:Chemtrail believers=uneducated,paranoid,­ill informed easily lead bunch of people who have never really fit in and want to belong to a group, they feel the world is against them and have generally failed at making their lives work within the social parameters we have.

    Debunkers of chemtrails: Smart, logical and successful people.May infact share the same distrust of the governments policies however dont let paranoia overrule their ability to think critically.

  • I know german and this translation is wrong and manipulative. but hey you would be sheeple if you would believe anything that's against your far fetched world view, right?

  • and this i saw with my own eyes, this was no youtube video.

    i saw it the whole spring and summer of 2011 here in berlin and it was crystal clear.

    the sunny day would suddendly become a grey day and it would eventually start to rain.

    as to the reasons why the "controllers" wanted it to be rainy, we can discuss forever... maybe they're testing shit, maybe it's a form of behaviour manipulation, maybe they use the rain to pollute our watercourses. it's all about depopulation and CONTROL.

    it's EVIL.

  • Thethorazineshuffle is a gov. paid disinformation agent.

  • @firstwave2

    possible.

    i'd like to add that this past (non existent) summer, EVERY TIME there were chemtrails in the sky, clouds would start to form and the sunny day would disappear in favor of a grey, cloudy, rainy day. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

    so, chemtrails are not only produced to change & modify our emotions + to pollute our bodies, but most certainly to modify the weather. i would bet 1.000 euros on it without a doubt.

    why would that be, i leave the reasoning to u folks...

  • @Obey9334 When they Spray here in L.A it will not rain every time they do it.However sometimes it will.But one thing is for certain that on Spray day's, your eyes burn and the skin itches followed by running itchy nose.I would not bet against you, as I know the trails contain a plethora of ingredients'.

  • @firstwave2

    of course.

    chemtrails, like everything else produced by the satanist superpowers ruling over us, sheeps, is not JUST one thing and one thing only.

    we have to let go of our rigid reasoning here... i am not a scientist but i am certain that chemtrails can be used for very many different reasons and purposes... weather manipulation, health manipulation, mind manipulation, emotional manipulation AND also certainly for other less evil reasons as previuosly outlined.

  • ..after all, we're talking about chemicals being sprayed in the sky and said chemicals can be almost anything. so,again, multi-purpose.

    i am sure of what i have witnessed with my own eyes, and i can tell you that a normal jet trail is not a chemtrail and the 2 are very very different; that after a plane passed leaving this chemtrail behing itself, said chemtrail would start becoming larger and larger.

    other jets would cross the same portion of sky over and over, until clouds started to form.

  • @firstwave2 when i give you a thumbs up your total remains at 4. When i give thethorazineAgent a thumbs down his total remains at 5 as well...

  • Translation is fucked up and outright distorting in several places. Guy at ~1:00 doesn't say chemtrail, he says "Düppel", which is the german word for chaff, IE countermeasures against radar-guided missiles. So what it actually reports is that chaff dropped during exercises caused surprisingly big false reports on weather radar and that some people are trying to file complains for environmental pollution over tchaff getting dropped in such exercises.

  • Meteorologists were complaining about the amount of CHAFF being used by the military jets in mock battles that was messing up their radar signatures and ability to recognize genuine clouds.

    Chaff is used to break radar lock, it is a compacted release of tiny aluminum strips of metal to cause as large a radar signature as possible so a radar guided missile will go for it instead of the plane. Similar to a flare and a heat seeker. Chemtrails are bullshit, and no evidence exists to prove otherwise.

  • @123backinyerface In the real world you are only a pathetic coward.

  • @firstwave2 I'd really appreciate if if you would keep your remarks on the video at hand instead of using the cowardly approach of leaving bitch marks on other peoples channels. Admitting you're ignorant of some things is really nothing to be ashamed of. The NWO is awesome by the way... :P

  • Bull crap its all bull crap just to try to fool us all...Believe the guy here who has alought of commen sence....Its all bull crap.

  • Ja,ja das verharmlosen ist bekannt.

  • Monika Griefahn (SPD MdB) bestätigte 2004 das Chemtrails gesprüht werden!

    watch?v=2sG-iYvvWSo

  • I just watched the documentary "What in the world are they spraying" 

    Its on youtube in 7 parts. It was very informal.

    I think we can all agree that given what Monsanto wants to do, and that they are producing, and patenting Aluminum resistant seeds now, using the powers of deduction we come to a logical conclusion that the spraying is happening.

    Again, you can test your own plants outside in your yard if you want.

    Personally i believe they are based on solid fact.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - its not that easy...the earth's crust is 8% aluminum and in some places much greater making agriculture very difficult- its been a problem for farmers for eons...

    Seed companies have been trying to develop alum-resistant seeds for decades...doesn't mean a persistent contrail is really a "chemtrail".

    see here for an interesting review of "what are they spraying":

    contrailscienceDOTcom/what-in-­the-world-are-they-spraying/

  • @TheThorazineShuffle that may be true about the earths crust, but thats an extremely small area. Thats actually a bullshit excuse. I hope youre not burying your head in the sand.

    Facts are clouds dont form in criss cross patterns, then expand, or fall. Mount Chasta doesnt natually have 61000 parts per billion of Aluminum in its snow.

    Dont defend the seed companies.  They are lobbying still to destroy back yard gardening.

  • @selfmadeboys88 (sigh) its not an "excuse" its simply fact. Seed companies have tried to develop alum-resistant seeds long before "chemtrails".

    Contrails DO form in criss-cross patterns- with over 30,000 flts daily in the US - flight paths cross ALL the time...its illogical to expect they wouldn't. COntrails DO expand- tthey are called "contrail cirrus" look it up.

    Shasta figures are a FAIL- see here for specific details:

    metabunkDOTorg/threads/137-Sha­sta-Snow-and-Water-Aluminum-Te­sts.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle What contrails, i never even mentioned contrails. i said "CLOUDS DONT FORM IN CRISS CROSS PATTERNS"

    I know contrails can, but again contrails dont linger around that long lol.

    Your disinfo is failing.

    How long have you worked for Monsanto lol?

  • @selfmadeboys88 - actually contrails CAN and OFTEN do persist for hours and spread into cirrus clouds.

    Why haven't you educated yourself on the nature of the atmosphere and the science of contrails? Seems foolish to pretend you know what you see in the guy when you clearly are ignorant of basic facts.

    Look up "contrail cirrus" and then tell us contrails don't "linger"...

  • @TheThorazineShuffle lol dont play the passive aggressive game, lol contrails dissipate. They dont linger in the sky, then expand.

    I see through your disinfo.

    How much does Monsanto pay you to go troll on youtube?

  • @boy88 - Sorry-physics is not "disinfo". Suggesting you actually educate yourself on the science regarding contrail formation and persistence is not "passive aggressive". Its simply logical. DO you have any substance to back up you belief that contrails "don't linger" -or is it some just vague notion?

    A quick review of 60yrs worth of atmospheric science would reveal that your belief quite the opposite of the historical record and the understanding of atmospheric scientists...please explain

  • @boys88 - if contrails can't persist- why were they studying them in 1972:

    Measurements of the Growth of the Ice Budget in a Persisting Contrail

    R.G. Knollenberg

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    Volume 29, Issue 7 (October 1972)

    "It is often observed that contrails spread considerably...Under favorable conditions, a lateral spread of kilometers is observed...If sufficient air traffic exists, and entire overcast of contrail cirrus may develop and PERSIST FOR HOURS."

    Do the research!

  • @TheThorazineShuffle lol i have, again look at your quote it says "favorable conditions"

    So is everyday a favorable condition for them then? lol To just span from horizon to horizon? THEN expand? and drop? Stop dancing around the facts. Please. Cause youre not supplying anything that has countered the facts that everyone sees.

    Seriously monsanto is gonna be upset with you, you must be a new disinfo agent for them, thats why youre not very good at this.

  • @elfboy -

    Your lying if you see persistent trails EVERY day...that is not the common theme amongst Believers nor is it an accurate description of the skies above my head...and yet in places and times it can be 40-50% of the time.

    ...and yet, it IS true- contrails can and often do persist for hours and spread into overcast- even fall streaks of ice

    don't ask me- research for yourself...or choose to remain ignorant and base your beliefs on internet myth and bullshit...no matter to me...

  • @TheThorazineShuffle Youve resorted to trolling and insulting. Therefore i win this debate. you no longer have said anything of value. Youre argument runs in circles. Just as troll most always do with their argument.

    IF you read the past comments i made i address those issues, but again youre not here to logical debate, youre here to troll, again most likely for monsanto.

    If you decide to actually debate instead of insult and name call, we can continue this convo :D

  • @selfmadeboys88 - I didn't insult you. Calling you ignorant is not an insult - simply a fact...

    You are apparently ignorant of the basic physics surrounding contrail formation and persistence thus it leads you to draw conclusions based on imperfect information...which is a quick path to failure.

    Can you explain why you think contrails can't persist?

    Why do clouds persist?

  • @TheThorazineShuffle now you put words in my mouth. Stop. I never mentioned clouds, and i certinly didnt say that they could not persist. Nor did i ever say that contrails could not persist. I am well aware of this. Again for your arguments sake you twisted the convo at points to alter it from my original point. If you feel that you are able to return to my original point that i made without putting words in my mouth, id be happy to oblige you in your attempt to troll.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - Your original point was that your thought "what in the World..." was very "infomal"

    If you think every thing in that movie is true and accurate...you should think again...In the spirit of open-minded discourse, I suggest you look at this review of that movie:

    contrailscienceDOTcom/what-in-­­the-world-are-they-spraying/

  • @TheThorazineShuffle God you are here just to provide disinfo.

    The link didnt work for me. Sorry, i dont know what to do about that, but! IN "what in the world are they spraying"

    The only thing that was ever said to be true was that there IS 61000 parts per billion of aluminum on Mount Chasta. THEY PROVED IT. Thats it. Aside from that they raised questions. Whats wrong with questioning?

    Its so obvious that you are here to provide disinfo. YOU LOST.

  • @boy - its great to question- but do not be so closed that you are not open to new info and learn to discern between fact and speculation

    read the perspective on that movie- go to: contrailscience DOTcom and look for the article on left side of the page...its interesting.

    As for the Shasta "samples"- highly suspect with several of the individuals in question backtracking- see here-

    metabunkDOTorg/threads/137-Sha­sta-Snow-and-Water-Aluminum-Te­sts.

    replace the word "dot" with an actual "."

  • @TheThorazineShuffle lol how are the samples highly suspect? I dont see anything that can make them suspect.

  • @selfmadeboys88-

    First of all, it is a GIANT leap of faith to suggest that any aluminum found is -without question- from the contents of jet exhaust. Secondly, the sample of snow from Shasta was taken in the summer when dust is prevalent and local rock in the area- andesite- has a large content of natural aluminum...

    Those 2 factors alone makes the results highly problematic and certainly not "proof" of anything.

    See here for details:

    tinyurlDOTcom/3j9puq7

  • @selfmadeboys88 - I find this funny...first you said:

    "(contrails).. dont linger in the sky, then expand"

    then you said:

    "Nor did i ever say that contrails could not persist"

    So...which is it...why the contradiction and backpedaling...

    And yet - the fact remains- Contrails CAN and OFTEN DO persist for hours, spread across the sky in a haze of cirrus cloud...

    So- when you see a trail do that- how do you know its a "chemtrail" and not a persistent contrail?

    "contrail cirrus" look it up.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle First can you answer how the samples on mount Chasta are suspect?

  • @selfmadeboys88 - did you not see this reply below?

    First of all, it is a GIANT leap of faith to suggest that any aluminum found is -without question- from the contents of jet exhaust. Secondly, the sample of snow from Shasta was taken in the summer when dust is prevalent and local rock in the area- andesite- has a large content of natural aluminum...

    Those 2 factors alone makes the results highly problematic and certainly not "proof" of anything.

    See here for details:

    tinyurlDOTcom/3j9puq7

  • @TheThorazineShuffle

    THAT IS YOUR ARGUMENT!? that the samples were taken in the summer so dust is making ALUMINUM show up in the snow??? SERIOUSLY?

    Since when is earth just blowing around micro particles of aluminum NATURALLY? KEY WORD NATURALLY.

    AND YOU BACK UP YOUR ARGUMENT WITH FORUM POSTINGS?

    GET REAL. You are criticizing my argument in support of the facts, while you only back yours up with other peoples skeptical postings...

    Youre not worth my time.

  • @selfmadeboys88 . There is aluminum in the dust NATURALLY. DO you realize the earth's crust contains aluminum right?? Even more so in the specific rock found on the slope where the "sample" was taken- its called andesite- look it up. THE FACTS ARE THAT ALUMINUM IS EXPECTED TO BE FOUND.

    The forum posting reviewed the data critically and even spoke with Mangels- the guy who did the lab work...VERY pertinent.

    You choose to disregard cuz it contradicts your beliefs...so be it...ignore reality.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle aluminum is not just blowing around in massive amounts across the planet. you say 8% of the earths crust is aluminum. THATS THE ENTIRE EARTH, therefore the amount would be almost unrecognizable.You question the validity of the doc, yet you put all your faith into a online forum.The documentary went out and spoke to the real people.DID ALL THE WORK,and yet you only back your argument up with people posting on a forum??

    Im not ignoring anything, you are.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - what you do not seem to understand is that in some places its much more than 8%- like on Shasta. Moreover, the people in the forum got the actual lab report used in the movie and SPOKE to Mangles- the person who took the sample and did the report- Its not "faith"...its a critical analysis based on facts, logic and reason.

    Just because they made a movie doesn't mean its true, or scientifically valid...

    Nor does it mean anything found came from a plane...illogical assumption

  • @TheThorazineShuffle You question me taking the doc for what it is? YET you trust everything said in a FORUM, where people just say they spoke to Mangles, i mean you want to play the faith game, its a two way street. You act like youre forum has all the answers and has debunked this doc, yet in the doc they spoke to the experts.THEN you say on your forum that THEY spoke to the experts, so youre playing a dangerous 2 way street game here, and getting no where man.

  • @self88 - no- I trust the facts. They simply presented facts- fact based analysis...unlike the movie where they SPECULATED based on incorrect assumptions, faulty methodology- inevitably leading to wrong conclusions.

    And they DIDN'T ask the "experts"- they did not interview a single atmospheric scientist about the trails in the sky- an entire movie about trails in the sky and not one interview with an expert on them...They based the whole movie on the myth that contrails can't persist and spread

  • @TheThorazineShuffle I dont think were talking about the same documentary then, because In the beginning of "what in the world are they spraying" they interview the actual atmospheric experts that are conducting the experiments. They even attend a conference they were holding and recorded it. Other experts they spoke with were the national forestry service lead gardener, along with Dane Wigington. Lol so your disinfo on this page is failing, cause i wont stop denying you.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - more failure on your part i guess...When they lie in first minute of the movie stating that contrails always dissipate- why do you accept it as truth? or the rest of the movie?. When wiggington says they found alum in water- when in FACT that tested POND SLUDGE- where U would expect to find alum- why do you accept the rest of the movie as "true"- its a major FAIL and a major FAIL on your part for eating it up with no ability to discern fact from fiction

    so be it.

  • @boy -when the movie tries to pass off CHAFF as some sort of secret "chemtrail"- why do U accept rest of the movie as fact?

    When geo-engineering - which includes many different possible project- has been discussed for decades& is still being discussed- why do U eat up the insinuation that its actually taking place? Esplly when DKieth- the movies main whipping boy SPECIFICALLY states that its NOT

    They DID NOT interview a single atmospheric scientist in that movie -sound bites R not interviews

  • @TheThorazineShuffle LOL yeah were not talking about the same documentary. I have no idea what documentary youre talking about then, cause in "what in the world are the spraying" they DO NOT try and pass off Chaff as this secret you talk of. Why dont you sit down and give "what in the world are they spraying" a try :) cause whatever youre talking about never took place in "what inthe world are they spraying"

    But as everyone knows you know that, youre just here to troll.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - now you are either lying, ignorant or haven't seen it- its in the first 5 minutes (4:10) when they specifically MENTION chaff...

    try again, skippy-

    of course, the entire premise of the movie is based on a myth...but of course, that doesn't matter to you....don't let facts get in the way of the "truth"

  • @TheThorazineShuffle LOL! NICE TRY! haha omg YOU MEAN AT 4:10 in "what in the world are they spraying"????! thats your argument!? thank you for making this so easy for me :D

    That is a video clip of a meteorologist on the west coast of the U.S talking about radar feed back that is chaff. The film makers are not using that clip saying "YES CHAFF IS CHEMTRAILS" as you said they were. Its just a film clip. LOL not once in the doc did anyone say what youre saying. OMG cake.

  • @boy - fool- the movie - in its propaganda like method- used the clips and sound bites to insinuate their claims are real....sorry if you are too naive to see that.

    Moreover, all the other FAILS of the movie you failed to address-like the myth that contrails can't persist and spread -the entire movie is based on a myth

    claim "water" samples that R really sludge from the bottom of a pond. They claim snow "samples" that R filled dust from rock that has high contents of aluminum...on &on..

    FAIL

  • @TheThorazineShuffle again man youre playing the dangerous faith game here. ITS A TWO WAY STREET IF YOU WANT TO PLAY THEN.

    How do you know for a fact that the got water samples from sludge from a pond?(I can tell you for a fact that lake chasta is very pristine)Cause you read a forum saying so? lol The doc went out and did work, found facts, shared them with the public. What is their alterer motive? What do they have to gain? Send me a personal message next time. depth.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - NO- FAIL again Boy....the actual lab report is available for all to see...you of course haven't bothered to look and will no doubt pretend its fake...

    see for yourself:

    contrailscienceDOTcom/what-in-­the-world-are-they-spraying/

    Just cuz they shared "facts" doesn't mean their science is valid, methodology correct and speculation accurate...

  • @TheThorazineShuffle wwwDOTchemtrailcentralDOTchemf­aqDOTshtml

    You see here, we can play this game all day.

  • @boys88 - So I take you couldn't be bothered to actually look the actual lab report - instead send a link for an "faq" that is pure speculation and hasn't been updated in 10yrs...

    I offered definitive proof that they tested pond sludge and tried to pas it off as a "water" sample...and all you can do ignore it & call it a game

    You seemingly do not have the capacity to engage in meaningful dialog based on facts, logic and reason...instead simply cling to dogma and dismiss any disagreement.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle So i take it you couldnt be bothered to read the faqs page?

    Again you see how this is a two way street?

  • @selfmadeboys88 - I did...ten yrs ago when they were first written...

    and yet still you avoid the reality of the facts presented - preferring obfuscation and deflection...

    Whatever- thats your cross to bear...you've clearly failed.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle There has been literally no ground gained nor lost here. You chose you stick to your guns even though they could be made up. I read everything you showed me. Everything i read, could likely be made up. AND YOU HAVE NO WAY OF PROVING OTHER WISE. You have faith in your beliefs. IF i spoke with the film makers and asked them personally about the things you showed me then we would have a different conversation.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - whatever- the lab report is not made up. The fact that contrails can and often do persist, spread and cover the sky in haze of cirrus cloud is not made up. The fact that they didn't acknowledge that in the movie and said the opposite is not made up. The fact that they passed off speculation as "fact" is not made up.

    The facts speak for themselves.

    Yes, "chemtrails" is a religion and your faith is strong.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle See how you debate? you just pass over any counter information that might challenge your faith. You just say whatever. lol Again nothing has happened here, everything youve shown me could be made up. You can argue with me till your blue in the face, but i still wont base my opinion off of some forum and a guy that cant even hold a debate.

  • @boys88 - what information have you provided?? none...

    I have rejected the "spray" movie because its "evidence" is circumstantial at best, and worst its myth and speculation based on faulty science...I look at the info and after rational review - reject.

    YOU? You can't even accept that the fact contrails can and often do "linger" &spread - and so seeing one do so and claiming its a "chemtrail" is a FAIL

    Sorry- physics isn't "made up"- see how you debate? rejecting reality in favor of what?

  • @TheThorazineShuffle wwwDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=J7­FZpwqqg0I

    You have your way of thinking, I have mine. If you think that, that mekes me rejecting your truth, well then my friend theres nothing i can do about it, but i rather always think outside the box, then out rightly reject. I read your website and everything you sent me.

    Im sending you this link now.

    Thats all.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - so when you watch that video- do you just accept it as fact? Everything he says is true? every video is without question a "chemtrail" ?

    Why can we find similar videos and pictures from before 1998?

  • @TheThorazineShuffle Well the thing about that video is, he provides the facts, And then i look them up. I research and observe. I dont just believe things people say, hence me not just believe the things you showed me. you see? And i told you i would need to speak with the creators of the documentary and ask them questions.

    Watch part to if you will. All i can do is ask, but its up to you to actually watch it.

  • @selfmadeboys88 - really?? "facts" like 60% of people have bronchitis? Persistent trails "started" in 1998? Contrails "always" dissipate in seconds?

    did you research those "facts"?? Obviously not if you believe them to be true.

    did you research any of the facts on ContrailScienceDOTcom? Obviously not if dismiss them simply because I showed them to you.

    you claim to be an independent thinker but I see no evidence of it.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle ok well thats just how yo think :)

  • @self - seriously...what did U research? did U independently verify the physics of contrail formation and persistence? Did U independently verify the historical record of persistent, spreading trails in the sky? Did U independently verify the "normal" amount of aluminum typically found in Mt Shasta andesite? Did you independently verify that 60% of the population has bronchitis?

    Did you find ANYTHING- even one thing- on ContrailscienceDOTcom that was false? ...and if so how did you verify it?

  • @TheThorazineShuffle how did you verify the things you showed me...

  • @selfmadeboys88 - really more obfuscation? See how you debate? can't even answer direct questions...just bob and weave...typical.

    I will take your non-answer as a NO....

    I did verify through the independent research, multiple sourcing, scientific method, study of physics, geology and more...

  • @TheThorazineShuffle sorry you think that then :/

  • @TheThorazineShuffle if contrails persist or not - chemtrails does still exists, there's plenty of proof including this video. I couldn't care less about the debate about how they look.

  • @clarkcolt45 - This video is not "proof" - the word "chemtrails" is never mentioned. They are speaking about Chaff- which is not secret and has nothing to do with "chemtrails".

    This video is deliberately mistranslated to fool gullible Believers...

    ...and so it has.

  • @TheThorazineShuffle you are insane or deliberately lying. CONtrails DO) NOT linger in the sky for hours until the entire sky is covered. Commercial aircraft do not fly at 3 thousand feet - they fly at 6 thousand fet, hence it is impossible these came from commercial planes being CHEMtrails are much lower than contreails. Also, regular contrails do not leave barium, aluminium and other chemicals in snow, air and water. You disinfo freaks are losing - the world is waking up to this monstrous S

  • @zoe- sorry- you're simply not informed. Contrail can and do persist, spread and cover the sky in haze of cirrus cloud if the air is humid enough. They are called "contrail cirrus" and have been observed and studied for decades- do the research- there is decades of historical record, scientific research, and anecdotal evidence...sorry if you have been misled by the Believers but its true- look up the terms "contrail cirrus" and "supersaturated persistent contrail"...& learn some basic science.

  • @zoe - if contrails can't persist, spread &cover the sky&never have...then why were they studying them 40yrs ago?

    Measurements of the Growth of the Ice Budget in a Persisting Contrail

    Knollenberg

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

    October 1972

    "It is often observed that contrails spread considerably...Under favorable conditions, a lateral spread of kilometers is observed...If sufficient air traffic exists, an entire overcast of contrail cirrus may develop and persist for hours."

  • The translation is completely false. The actual German audio tells a rather different story: it's not about weather manipulation and chemicals, but about chaffs deployed from fighter planes during military exercises that were falsely registered as rain clouds on meteorological radars.

  • WATCH: Chemtrails vs. Bond (The Sky Who Didn't Love Me)

  • this shit is in the skies almost everyday here in berlin.

  • @0beyable In denmark too.

  • Perfect example how disinformation and manipulation works.

    Here is real information:

    "Chemtrails, Eastlund Patent and all the weather REALLY explained"

  • What a bunch of fags posting on here!! LMAO " duh uh, I am a DEEEbunker, duh hu hu"! fucken morons. Here is how it is, if you got enough time to sit around you tube, attempting to debunk. Chances are you no very well educated at all! Yet you probably prey to an fucken invisible make believe person that doesnt exist. Faith!! LMFAO believe what you want. The govt just admitted last week that they intentionally infected 6000 Guats with std's and killed many. I dont believe anything they say!

  • @goingfor11 And your reference to praying to an invisible man generally correlates with chemtrail believers because it takes the same kind of blind faith to believe in them. Theres no proof, just what people say they know whats going on, they can feel it, just look up etc. All sounds very much like most religions to me. I believe in science and the science doesn't support this conspiracy! Do some research outside of conspiracy websites before you make yourself look like an even bigger fool!

  • I speak German and English equally well, and this, dear viewers, this is a FAKE! They are talking about the experimental use of FLARES and CHAFFS, not of chemical trails!! :()

  • hey guys i'm just here for a quick favour. i was hoping some of you could dislike the video called chemtrails and black beams. He is working with the government trying to debunk chemtrails and he is bloody annoying. the video is from roadrunner. thanx to anyone who checks it out

  • @steve76384 Actually I prefer to spend my time debunking stupid chemtrail vids too! If you really think about it all they do is distract people from REAL environmental issues! It amazes me the Americans can be so scared by so called chemicals being dumped on them from the sky yet you emit more emissions per capita than any other country on the earth with your big oversized inefficient cars! The irony is amazing!

  • @riceburnagtv lol pitty i'm not from america. i'm from Australia and i ride a kangaroo to work.

  • @steve76384 Fuck so we have dumbarses here too hey! Dont be a fool Steve, take the time to actually research these things and see them for the hoax that they are!

  • @riceburnagtv I'm always happy to research but all i ever find is bad news and shitty cover ups. do you have any suggestions or links?

  • @steve76384 Get onto a site called above top secret,its actually a conspiracy website where some pretty amazing ideas are explained about a heap of stuff and debated on by some very intelligent people.Read some of the chemtrail threads and see if you can start to see the common theme within them. Another good one after you stop in there is contrail science website.Alot of believers say they have an open mind but sometimes it has tp be open enough to realise when something is a crock of shit too!

  • @riceburnagtv Real environmental issues like what "global warming"or "climate change",the latest catch title! Its funny how most us americans are poor, yet we are blamed for the pollution created by the mega corporations!Most families "carbon footprint" is equal to an ocean fart!! Yet the creators of this global scheme have a footprint equal to 100 families or more!! The environmental movement was hijacked long ago by the biggest polluters!! They market big cars to bleed you wallet for fuel!

  • @goingfor11 When TF did I mention global warming?OR that I agree with bullshit like carbon footprints? The reason I debunk this shit is because its UTTER BULLSHIT.Just look at the deliberate mis translation of the German in the vid! If these things are so real why are all the vids on here of contrails?OR expose of nothing more than chaff, cloud seeding or planes dropping water,fuel or set up for testing?ITS A HOAX A DISTRACTION and you have to be a fool to fall for any of it!

  • @riceburnagtv Also would have to add, that our govt has very creative ways of writing bills that are subject to translation, tailored to their plans!! Take libya's "no-fly zone" scam for example! they claim its a legitimate for "humanitarian " reasons. LMAO So when i have planes and jets from the air-force base flying over my house my entire life, well you tend to notice some patterns! Understanding our govt, coupled with H.R.2995. They are up to something. Law or not! They bypass laws!

  • @goingfor11 WTF DOES ANY OF THAT HAVE TO DO WITH CHEMTRAILS? I know the government does what it wants, they have killed over 1 million for oil, what are you dumb cunts doing about that? Staring up at the sky monitoring how your orgon cloudbusters are supposedly clearing the skies?Wake the fuck up!YOu dickheads are ruining any chance we have to get the average Joe to pay attention to real issues because anyone who disagrees with the gov gets tarred with the same brush as conspiracy nutjobs!

  • @riceburnagtv And finally I will end with the fact that a couple months ago, the UN banned chem-trailing specifically!! LMAO I hate the fucken UN and the rest of the globalist prick orgs and I dont trust them, Thats why I always frequent their website. I myself was surprised when I read the report! But Its funny how you believe that your some superior thinker with some higher intellectual knowledge than everyone else, when its you thats been drinkin to much of the kool-ade , just a parrot!

  • I really wish that these chemtrail supporters would do their homework properly!

    They reference other YouTube chemtrail videos without even looking at them.

    Even if they look fully at the referenced video, they then embellish the part of the video they quote.

    

  • Excellent example of this was with

    Canadian Chemtrail Documentary

    watch?v=lSCIQ14dHqM&feature=ch­­­annel_video_title

    Somebody embellished a reported law suit quoted at 0:50 into

    " and here in this vid you will see a meteorologist point out the LAW SUIT that was recently WON by a town in Canada for its water being made toxic by aluminum and barium in chemtrails!"

    I am not really sure what their intention was? Just to deceive and reinforce their chemtrail stand ?

  • You know what pal. You really lose all credibility when you change the closed captioning to suit your own adjenda. What else do you have up your sleeve, you stupid CUNT.

  • Wehrt Euch, leistet Widerstand!

  • @music6433:

    Wogegen?

  • Chemtrails = heute Deutschland, morgen Europa und übermorgen die ganze Welt ! greetings from Germany !

  • @Quetzalgoatl Contrails gibt es überall auf der Welt. Düppel werden auch von fast allen Luftwaffen eingesetzt.

    Sogenannte Chemtrails hingegen existieren nicht.

    Dass früher über Kriegsgebieten (Vietnam z.B.) Chemikalien verstreut wurden (siehe Agent Orange) bestreitet niemand, dass Verkehrsflugzeuge hingegen Metalle verstreuen ist absoluter Schwachsinn!

  • @Chicken3gg,

    ok ich selbst mache (täglich) andere erfahrungen bzw. beobachtungen. Ca. frhs drei uhr also im dunkeln wird der Himmel mit was auch immer speziell über Chemnitz verstärkt besprüht so das er tagsüber milchig ist. Am Nachmittag gehts dann munter weiter. Diesen Sommer verstärkt in Mecklenburg Vorpommern daher auch schlechte Ernten und überflutungen. Ist klar wenn die Sonne nicht mehr durchkommt. Was auch immer versprüht wird es passiert täglich und nicht ohne Gund. Viel Grüße

  • @Chicken3gg Wie kannst Du behaupten dass etwas was man jeden Tag sieht nicht existiert ? Andersrum gibt es ja genug Sachen die wir nicht sehen OBWOHL es sie sehr wohl gibt . Ausserdem geht es hier NICHT um Verkehrsflugzeuge (die bringen Menschen und Waren von A nach B und kreuzen nicht vor der Sonne rum). Und es geht nicht um Metalle die sie sie versprühen (wär gar nicht schlecht wenn die sich mal in Luft auflösen wie die am 11. September :) )

  • @tomcat8153 was verstehst denn du unter Chemtrails? Irgendwelche "Drogen", die die Menschen beeinflussen sollten?

    Ich meinte, als Chemtrails werden fälschlicherweise Wolken, sogenannte Contrails bezeichnet, die lange am Himmel bleiben und schön breit werden (z.B. wegen hoher Feuchte dort oben)

  • These aspects are much better explained by aerosolized biological agents (i.e. mycoplasma) INTENDED to affect millions. To what end, I must leave to your imagination....

    This would be exactly what ONLY a weather radar would show as clouds.

    Start by educating yourself about the potentials, e.g. by going to Garth Nicolson's lectures here on youtube.

  • 2. Why do these "experiments", if ever admitted to, occur near densely populated areas? The incidence of chemtrail sprayings correlates strongly with population density in potentially affected areas and major wind directions spreading the aerosol over dense populations.

  • 1. The commentator points out that the clouds could ONLY be seen on weather radar. This narrowly absorbing quality wouldn't be true of any metal particles small and light enough to stay at high altitudes for any useful length of time.

  • This "concession" of the German military to have sprayed "something" (considered to be aerosolized metal particles) "to test radar evasion for airplanes" is in fact common disinformation about chemtrails (i.e. their alleged weather-relatedness). Just consider some basic aspects of this and similar operations:

  • Who translated this? They only talk about chaff and flare's... Not "Chemtrails"! Whoever translated this is a douchebag and all those who believe him are stupid ppl aswell!

  • RTL= fairy tale lesson!

  • RTL-Mainstream-Blablabla .. "wurde nur ganz geringe Mengen dieser Düppel ausgebracht" .. bla bla bla .. Nicht einmal wird das Wort "Chemtrails" in den Mund genommen, weder Alluminium, Barium, Sodium, Geo-Engineering, das Wort Wettermodifikation nur am Rande. Als ich heute vor 3 Stunden den Himmel betrachtet habe dachte ich einfach nur "Geil, so sollte der Himmel aussehen" .. jetzt sieht man schon wieder die erste großflächigen Chemtrails .. die sprühen diesen Dreck mind. ungefähr alle 2-3 Tage.

  • What the Fuck is This? U obviously didnt take into consideration the fact there are people with internet-connections capable of actually understanding german? Remove this shit.

  • die grünen sie die schlimmsten heuchler

  • türlichblaaaa ,militär wars , und militäe fliegt jeden tag quer durch D un vorallem über städten ok , alles klar ...BULLSHIT inzwischen wirds auch wieder totgeschhwiegen,, typisch drecksd mainstream news

  • they may be poisoining us all but what is the bigger picture behind this as i feel that they have you where they want you. complaning about something that isn't the real reason why they are masking the view of the skies. E.L.E.N.I.N. look on NASA website it's there then google it to find out the real reason's behind chemtrails. you have been duped simple as. EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENT NIBIRU IS NEAR. planet x wormwood dark destroyer. official name E.L.E.N.I.N. stop wasting time prepare for it.

  • Indeed, nobody talks about chemtrails in this video.

    Here is a video that does:

    Chemtrails, Eastlund Patent and all the weather REALLY explained

  • Romania to

  • Chemtards are beyond help

  • @riceburnagtv go back to sleep

  • @hoplite46 Go get some freeking new material other than "wake up" Go to sleep" "sheeple" etc. YOU all want to rely on your buzz words rather than evidence. Thats because its all you have, you have no evidence,just twisting things like cloud seeding and chaf into chemtrail theories,and people with cameras filming weird looking clouds. Hers another classic buzz phrase"just look up" or "I know what I see"

    You people are retarded,your acting similar to neanderthol man the first time he saw lighting!

  • Just to correct the subtitles: "Geringe Mengen" does not mean "low altitudes" but "small amounts"

  • Worth looking at

    Chemtrails BEBUNKED COMPLETELY

    watch?v=RLbNtEnVDYk

  • THEY ALSO USING THIS IN THE NETHERLANDS i brought water samples and pictures of chemtrails and contrails but i didnt get any info back i told them tht it were TWO engine commercial flights with sprayers and she sayd can u prove it.....

    they kno it happens but the wanna fool u

  • @rememberfluffyclouds

    Look at

    HAT MYSTERIOUS GAP ??PARANOID CHEMNUTS - WHAT YOU GUNNA DO ??

    watch?v=pTVP9y0iP5A&feature=em­ail&email=comment_received

    How do you explain that gap between jet exhaust and gradual start of trail?

    ONLY CONTRAILS can have this gap. The alleged constituents of "chemtails" i.e. metallic substances. cannot be invisible!

  • @erniepond1 this is my friend in the air force, admitting that they use chemtrails on base;

    ht tp://i1213(dot)photobucket(dot­)com/albums/cc463/lars2458/che­mtrailproof-1(dot)jpg

    I talked with him awhile after that. No matter what they're using them for (radar clogging, weather control), the chemicals in them are not good for humans.

  • @Mandama004

    Of course the military experiment and use radar blocking chemicals for blocking radar. This has been a common practice since WW2.

  • The newest delivery system of chemtrails has arrived!!!

    Google

    CHEMTRAIL CUBE SPRAYERS

    Your bailout tax dollars at work to kill you with..

  • if you belive this. add me to your facebook peter baker this shit is going on in the uk

  • "When cob webs fill the sky, the end is near", Book of Daniel.

    ....I'm not AT ALL religious but, those words, written long long ago, keep coming to mind when I look up at the sky.

  • ..Strange eh?...not a single cirrus cloud in the sky, which means the "conditions" are not right for the formation and persistance of them. Yet "contrails" persist for hours in conditions where they cant exist???....go figure........I see this on a regular basis.

  • People should Blowing those Air Planes out of the Sky.Fucking Assholes the're Murdering our Children in right front of our eyes

  • Disinformation in this propaganda is that the purpose of the chemtrails is to disrupt radar. True it's possible to disrupt radar, but that's not the PRIMARY purpose of chemtrails. In years past the importance of the chemtrails was to desensitize the people everywhere to seeing chemtrails. Soon it will be to deliver biological warfare and after that it will be to deliver instantly deadly chemical warfare agents. I read already they're chemtrailing plutonium, in the midst of Fukushima 3Xmeltdown.

  • so when the cheamical weapons start destruct us we al think muslims did this

    poor human kined only islam can save your soul maby not your life but your soul for sure

  • @ennou81 Being a decent person will save your soul. Ascribing to a particular organization, religion or calling your god a certain name are all shallow tasks.

  • hinweg deren "kondensstreifen" nicht nach ca 10 minuten verschwinden so wie mans mal in physic/chemie unterricht gelernt hat,.. sondern bleiben ewig,.. und sie bilden richtige wolken aus ! leute chemtrails sind kein hirngespinst oder verschwöhrungstheorie sondern nckte wahrheit ;)

  • naja also rtl erzählt uns da auch nur eine anwedung von chemtrails ;) deren verwendung is grandios und manugfaltig!! ich kenne zufällig nen general der bundeswehr ,genauer gesagt der deutschen luftwaffe!!,.. es sind nicht nur "düppel" sondern den treibstoff werden nanopartikel beigefügt brom schwefeloxide aluminiumoxide,. HORMONE !!!! zur populationskontrolle,.. is euch noch nich aufgefallen es wird freundlches wetterfreies wetter prognostiert, und was ist flugzeuge fliegen über unsere köppe

  • its no doubt that there will always be a portion of society that is more "illuminated" than others, or so they claim to be. To call yourself "illuminated" but practice in darkness, is kind of an inacurate statement. To truly be"illuminated" you would follow the path of illumination, these fleebs that are incuded in the accusation of being "illuminati" are nothing but thugs and perverts, that are too impressed with their own "illumination" to be able to enlighten.

  • B.S.

  • du scheiße nee. jetzt ist schon ein sender wie RTL vollkommen verblödet. was kotzen mich dise typen an mit ihren chemtrails.

  • You can fight back against chemtrails, though unbelievable in the beginning (of course, because the relating orgone technology is extremely suppressed):

    Look for Don Croft's orgonite devices. For Germans I recommend the cb-forum. Then you'll be extremely surprised if you discover that this is really going on in reality. It's so far beyond a 'normal' person's imagination that you'll very probably dismiss it as 'science fiction/fantasy/horror' stories of some 'complete lunatics'.

  • Dropping chaffs is no Chemtrailing, they publish this crap in order to explain Chemtrailing as something that occurs in military exercises which is absolute bullcrap. All the chaffs a fighter plane carries are not sufficient to generate clouds and they are way to big to stay in the sky long enough too, no nanoparticles here these chaffs measure about 5cm each to distract radar guided missiles which they could not do in nanoparticle-size. It's just another cover up. Eat it and shut up style.

  • Duppel means chaff.