To build a flying saucer is a lot easier and more economical than building a standard airplane. They have to build a machine that has to utilize oil for propulsion. Flying saucers have been already invented in the 50's, but since there would be less maintenance costs, no need for fuel, etc, they aren't built. Money makes the world go round.
Yes, antigravity (saucer propulsion), and UFO-data and reality are suppressed by the Mainstream media and their corporate bosses, because this form of propulsion and free-energy are one and the same thing. Would mean SAYONARA, to oil, bilfuels, Natural gas, Coal, and Nuclear energy. Saucer propulsion and energy is the cleanest, cheapest energy there is! Reason why the aliens from all over see us as "an insane society, rushing headlong to self-destruction".
Professor John Searl and his teams built 41 VTOL flying slender discs, at fantastic speeds, from 10-feet to 40-feet in diameter, from 1952-1978. The Flying Saucer is no mystery. I've been building and flying WORKING flying saucers since the late 1980s. I am in charge of the IGV new work for Manned Flight division. The future is NOW. Thanks to our boss, and living legend, professor John RR Searl.
Part 1: They don't want us to have it because it also creates a over unity energy, they keep this information suppressed from us at great lengths, electrons are directly related to gravity and in fact if you remove them say from hydrogen for instance you now have monoatomic hydrogen atoms that have super conducting properties.
Yes, the Biefeld-Brown effect is way overunity. It actually violates the 1st law of Thermodynamics. The force has been measured in the lab in air and hi-vacuum as 100-million times more powerful than ion wind can physically produce, is overunity, and cancels inertia and G-forces.
Part 2: This is where not only anti gravity among other great things that time will tell but over unity energy comes in, these positive ions in a solid state will now steel electrons from surrounding air giving us in effect free energy by attracting negative electrons, I have actually designed a unit that will do this, if any one wants to see it or learn more please pm me.
Yea, it's called the Tesla Flying Machine. He built plans for a "cigar shaped" or Disc Shaped" self-powered flying device in the early 1900's Unfortunetly they were stolen, Gee I wonder by whom?
I saw the lifter theory on Discovery Channel and they demonstrated that was not a cancellation of the gravity at all so not should be called `antigravitics` nevertheless I want to know more about `electrogravitics`...Sir Luke, thanks for your work, I admire it very much.
No offrense to anyone, but that show on Discovery is B-U-N-K. Lifters are not electrogravitic (EG) propulsion. Here is a simile to help you understand the difference: Lifter is to EG as a hot air balloon is to a missile.
Hope that helps you grasp the difference. There is a lot of disinformation and misinformation about electrogravitic propulsion.
Actually they have been proved to work in a vacuum, it is not ionized air lifting it with wind, it is ionising the object, and the anti gravity force is stronger than the gravity force so you do not have to ionize the hole thing.
I have made spoons lose weight by removing electrons and other things by adding solid state ions and heating.
I am a world expert on electrogravitcs for past 19-years. Pick my brain. I fly the largest saucers and VTOL devices in the world with much less electrical energy than DeSeversky's ionocraft, since the late 1980s, and yes I have published my findings.
You are mistaking electrostatics for electrogravitics. Electrostatics is like a two year old blowing on a dandelion compared to the hurricane force of electrogravitic propulsion.
It can be generated, controlled, and safely harnessed. Wallace had a few patents on generating a secondary gravitational force for propulsion. He was a brilliant scientist who worked at GE Aerospace in Valley Forge PA, and GE Re-Entry Systems in Philadelphia.
I live a couple miles from what was the GE Space Center,(locate accross from the big mall in King of Prussia, PA) (TT Brown did successfly vacuum flying disc experiments there in 1959) now it is Lockheed-Martin Space.
Hello, Captain. From a comment above: "free energy by attracting negative electrons" really caught my eye. Do you have a comment on this? I would fly with you any day. Please?
All have invented and flown EARTHLY force-field propelled discs. This is the future of mankind. Clean, much faster than rocketry, inertially dampened,and zero-pollution.
Airfoil/ramjet, plasma thruster, MHD, electrogravitic, fusion/fission/antimatter, and inertial propulsion systems are the types available in building a disc or other UFO craft. Not all UFOs are spacecraft.
there easy to build, enough current threw an object ionizes it and creates anti gravity. Electrons are directly related to gravity as well, you can do it with electrical current or sound or vibrational frequency. As far as a plasma propulsion, simple too, remove the electrons from water and you get superconducting ions from the hydrogen atoms that are now plasma :)
To build a flying saucer is a lot easier and more economical than building a standard airplane. They have to build a machine that has to utilize oil for propulsion. Flying saucers have been already invented in the 50's, but since there would be less maintenance costs, no need for fuel, etc, they aren't built. Money makes the world go round.
litetheory 2 years ago
This is amazing.
Curicua 2 years ago
Yes, antigravity (saucer propulsion), and UFO-data and reality are suppressed by the Mainstream media and their corporate bosses, because this form of propulsion and free-energy are one and the same thing. Would mean SAYONARA, to oil, bilfuels, Natural gas, Coal, and Nuclear energy. Saucer propulsion and energy is the cleanest, cheapest energy there is! Reason why the aliens from all over see us as "an insane society, rushing headlong to self-destruction".
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Professor John Searl and his teams built 41 VTOL flying slender discs, at fantastic speeds, from 10-feet to 40-feet in diameter, from 1952-1978. The Flying Saucer is no mystery. I've been building and flying WORKING flying saucers since the late 1980s. I am in charge of the IGV new work for Manned Flight division. The future is NOW. Thanks to our boss, and living legend, professor John RR Searl.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Part 1: They don't want us to have it because it also creates a over unity energy, they keep this information suppressed from us at great lengths, electrons are directly related to gravity and in fact if you remove them say from hydrogen for instance you now have monoatomic hydrogen atoms that have super conducting properties.
1gunner1000 3 years ago
In a gravity-field, electrons have a tendency to fall "up".
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Yes, the Biefeld-Brown effect is way overunity. It actually violates the 1st law of Thermodynamics. The force has been measured in the lab in air and hi-vacuum as 100-million times more powerful than ion wind can physically produce, is overunity, and cancels inertia and G-forces.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Part 2: This is where not only anti gravity among other great things that time will tell but over unity energy comes in, these positive ions in a solid state will now steel electrons from surrounding air giving us in effect free energy by attracting negative electrons, I have actually designed a unit that will do this, if any one wants to see it or learn more please pm me.
1gunner1000 3 years ago 2
Yes I have been building and flying these since the late 1980s. Pleacse chech out my channel. My works speak for me.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Yea, it's called the Tesla Flying Machine. He built plans for a "cigar shaped" or Disc Shaped" self-powered flying device in the early 1900's Unfortunetly they were stolen, Gee I wonder by whom?
ATHOW 3 years ago 2
5 million volts will do good and try to get into the system a resonance controll!
rdavm 3 years ago
What propulsion of mentioned here do the UFOs of STS-75 and STS-80 use?
Hansolo60 3 years ago
What propulsion do the UFOs of Shuttle missions STS-48, STS-75 and STS-80 use, and how big are they?
Hansolo60 3 years ago
Electrogravitic and/or magnetohydrodynamic. The two can be closely intertwined depending on the mechanics. King's craft is such an example.
UFOhowto 3 years ago
I saw the lifter theory on Discovery Channel and they demonstrated that was not a cancellation of the gravity at all so not should be called `antigravitics` nevertheless I want to know more about `electrogravitics`...Sir Luke, thanks for your work, I admire it very much.
cgiraldo87 3 years ago
No offrense to anyone, but that show on Discovery is B-U-N-K. Lifters are not electrogravitic (EG) propulsion. Here is a simile to help you understand the difference: Lifter is to EG as a hot air balloon is to a missile.
Hope that helps you grasp the difference. There is a lot of disinformation and misinformation about electrogravitic propulsion.
UFOhowto 3 years ago
Actually they have been proved to work in a vacuum, it is not ionized air lifting it with wind, it is ionising the object, and the anti gravity force is stronger than the gravity force so you do not have to ionize the hole thing.
I have made spoons lose weight by removing electrons and other things by adding solid state ions and heating.
1gunner1000 3 years ago
I am a world expert on electrogravitcs for past 19-years. Pick my brain. I fly the largest saucers and VTOL devices in the world with much less electrical energy than DeSeversky's ionocraft, since the late 1980s, and yes I have published my findings.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
You are mistaking electrostatics for electrogravitics. Electrostatics is like a two year old blowing on a dandelion compared to the hurricane force of electrogravitic propulsion.
UFOhowto 3 years ago
So this "electrogravitics" can be controlled?
LimitPushing 3 years ago
It can be generated, controlled, and safely harnessed. Wallace had a few patents on generating a secondary gravitational force for propulsion. He was a brilliant scientist who worked at GE Aerospace in Valley Forge PA, and GE Re-Entry Systems in Philadelphia.
UFOhowto 3 years ago
I live a couple miles from what was the GE Space Center,(locate accross from the big mall in King of Prussia, PA) (TT Brown did successfly vacuum flying disc experiments there in 1959) now it is Lockheed-Martin Space.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Hello, Captain. From a comment above: "free energy by attracting negative electrons" really caught my eye. Do you have a comment on this? I would fly with you any day. Please?
LETTERSOFMYOWN 3 years ago
You're in KoP? Sweet- Malvern, here. I wouldn't mind seeing some of your work in person.
OmicronIII 2 years ago
makes sence
leb2nv1989 3 years ago
How much current is "enough" current?
freightdog777 3 years ago
TT Brown. Marcel Pages. John RR Searl.
All have invented and flown EARTHLY force-field propelled discs. This is the future of mankind. Clean, much faster than rocketry, inertially dampened,and zero-pollution.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Hey i wanna see you build one ;)
DjEzhel88 3 years ago
mmm... what does magneto-hydro-dynamic have to with air or space propulsion? :)
Kenzofeis 3 years ago
Airfoil/ramjet, plasma thruster, MHD, electrogravitic, fusion/fission/antimatter, and inertial propulsion systems are the types available in building a disc or other UFO craft. Not all UFOs are spacecraft.
UFOhowto 3 years ago
there easy to build, enough current threw an object ionizes it and creates anti gravity. Electrons are directly related to gravity as well, you can do it with electrical current or sound or vibrational frequency. As far as a plasma propulsion, simple too, remove the electrons from water and you get superconducting ions from the hydrogen atoms that are now plasma :)
1gunner1000 3 years ago 2
i agree how do u built a maybe a 1000 billion or trllion machine to area 51 or nasa how do u built one millions of km away in space
theoman666 4 years ago
wat does this mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mrstmccoy 4 years ago
Do you have one ? If so could you show it to us ?
artax2004 4 years ago