Added: 4 years ago
From: zxwar
Views: 12,525
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • We had the best tanks but the poorest commanders. Sucks... along with air superiority, better communication and preparation, the Germans could easily take our tanks out although being inferior :(

  • @oOCrossroadsOo Be happy now the Americans have the poorest commanders.

  • @astrialkil

    thats a lie

  • @oOCrossroadsOo I say if they had learned to charge their tanks in the second the Polish were invade they could've easily had taken the advantage, except France only cared really for defending it's own borders

  • Wasn't the frontal armor 100mm+ though?

  • @Paciat, though the Char B1 was an old concept the Matilda would surely lose an engagement on equal terms, because of its horrible weak 2 pdr gun.

  • Whats this documentary called?

  • @Josex26 The whole series was called "Battlefield". It covered WWII in multiple series and did an excellent job. Their was a another series made about the US war in Vietnam and is very good as well.

    Find them.

  • I think that Matilda II would win a 1 vs 1 with a Char B1.

  • the B1bis litteraly terrorised the germans in may-june 1940. it couldn't be destroyed by german tanks, nore by anti-tank weapons. only the flak 88 gun used as anti-tank could get rid of it.

  • an excellent tank, with no major weakness except a large fuel consumption which limited its autonomy.

  • @fabizio

    One big weakness exploited by German Pzkw 38s of Rommel's 7th Panzer Division was the radiator grill on one side. Some B1 bis were refuelling when a unit of 38s came by. Shooting for the grill, many of these 30-ton French tanks were destroyed by 9 ton German tanks. The German's good communications and manouvering meant their tanks' faults were overcome in defeating the thicker armoured and often better armed French tanks.

  • @fabizio The placement of the guns wasn't optimal either, they had to turn the whole tank to aim that big gun in the hull. Also I believe the driver was also the gunner for the 75mm, which isn't that great either.

  • @evildeathmonkey1 Yes, he was and used a stereo-optic gun site. He would look at tow images and adjust the site till it was one image. Then it was ranged in. This was only done when firing the gun. The driver had conventional ports and a hatch to aid driving

  • hhh

  • battle ships have 5 inch guns (100) and it shoots faster

  • tee hee

  • I wish this show was on more often.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more