Added: 3 years ago
From: CBSNewsOnline
Views: 111,873
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (315)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • this scanner is a gift to pedopornofilia.will see a lot of baby's naked pictures

    just a new way for porn

    they can see through your shirt and not your bra

    come on...we're not idiots

    they can do a tac to me while i'm waiting in the airport

    if they want to see me naked they just ask me

    fuck the system faster

  • I hate that stupid hag.

  • but what if your not wearing underwear/bra?

  • what a bunch of bullshit! why would it see through the top layer and not the second. plus itsbeen proven that they save the images. ive seen the actual images.

  • i dont buy, how a machine can scan through one layer of clothes but not two. thats just stupid and quite ineffective if its to be used as a true scanning device

  • @SIMONERENTISS Oh i don't know? Cancer patients maybe! ITS A X-RAY YOU FOOL. what do you put on when you get xrayed? a led jacket. where does the doctor go? in a nother fuckin room! why?! Let me take another wild gander. To prevent CANCER! its not pornographic! please! the shit we watch ona day to day bases...the abercrombie and fitch adds we're exposed to! please! USA the land of promisquity is offended! lol. That probably landed that lady a modeling career! TSA lies! guess what? so do you

  • who the fuck cares ?

  • How did I get here? I waswatching a Family guy video a ninute and a half ago?!?!?

  • @DjHippie2K11 same here.... and I am not even American!?!?! o.O google is evil..

  • @Boromir26 Haha :) Im not American either :)

  • that is pornograhic wtf..was she paid to be stupid...because i know im not stupid

  • FUCK YOU BITCH YOU FUCKING IDIOT THEY JUST SWITCHED FROM HIGH QUALITY IMAGE TO A LOW RESOLUTION FOR A QUICK DEMONSTRATION THE REALITY IS THEY HAVE SEEN MY WHOLE COCK WHEN I PASSED THERE

  • rt.com rules

  • TSA LIES!!

  • I'm sure it sees through the bra... or else people can hide bombs in their bras right? And I'm sure the pants go transparent too.... and I'm sure the face is not blurred... seriously what's the point of this video? Who's buying this?

  • seriously i would rather have the lady in a locked room check my x-rayed pockets then be groped.

    i have had to strip down to jeans and a tank top in the airport before, the scanner shows the chick in jeans and a bra. so?

  • you freaks make me sick. so obsessed with "everything the man does is evil" that it makes it impossibly for anyone to hear the voice of people who are talking about true government corruption. unless you have never seen a doctor, profesionals have done things that would be otherwise inapropriate. this is no different, and not only is the full body scan less invasive, but it is more effective than the crap your privacy obcession subjects us to.

  • The scanners can't see if you have a bomb in your ass. Better check that one too before letting people on a plane!

  • what if the woman was NOT wearing a bra ?? Then nipples AHOY !!

  • @FLFCH That's a good question, what DOES it look like when a woman is not wearing her bra-This coming from a woman BTW

  • @FLFCH That's a good question, what DOES it look like when a woman is not wearing her bra - This coming from a woman BTW

  • Stahl considers the human body to be "pornagraphic" (her own word), which means that she needs professional counseling, and also that she has no business working as a journalist.

  • I just had one of these done at the Philly airport. I didn't realize until after I was done exacty what it was doing.

  • @Cherylyiyi How did it feel to be violated without asking first? They don't even ask they just push you right in there!

  • The mere fact that they think people will believe in the bullshit they have to say about the images not being stored is just insulting. Morons and frauds.

  • LoL, fake picture. How does it not see through the bra and shorts in that picture? If it can't see through the bra and shorts then it wouldn't be able to see through your clothes at all. Haha. Hella setup.

  • They should probably just use racial profiling....

  • something pornographic What the fuck nudity isn't porn people say it is because it encourages sexual thought bull shit well if a 13 year old male sees a girl walk down the hall way dressed like a skank and gets a boner dus that make it porn no, you see nudity at art museums were children go to learn about the arts I don't think they would show porn to kids so classifying nudity as porn is stupid like if I see some one get shot on tv and I think murder dus that make me a murderer no it dus not

  • Of course that idiot woman says "Oh, it's not pornographic at all". Who the hell, dear? It's still more than they need to see, and the pat-down alone shows where these creeps' heads are. If I ever step through one of those scanners, they'll see my image flipping them the bird.

  • c'mon.. how stupid can you be... why wouldnt the machine see through the bra if they didnt want to check for a knife or a sharpe object hidden in the bra? smh... riiiiiiiiiiiight...

  • If the face is blurred then wtf is the point? How would they stop someone if they had a weapon on them, but can't identify them? Do they yell out, "Stop the one with the big titties!!"

    freepinellas. wordpress. com

  • "these machines are not capable of storing these images." I call bullshit, these machines definitely save these images into a database. The government pretty much saves everything we type online into their data bases.

  • @oldspice420 Basic computer system architecture rules out the possibility of not being able to store/transmit those images in any way.

  • What a crock! Do they think we really are that stupid?

  • Highly doubt the machine just takes 1 layer of clothes off, or understands to leave underwear on.

  • @zero2evans well some guys and girls never wear or somtitimes dont wear any underwear

  • Of course they store the images. Everything is kept so that they can look back on them if they needed to. C'mon do you think we are that f'ing stupid? This crazy shit reminds me of how the nazis manipulated their own people, but even the nazis wouldn't feel up children. This is sick.

  • GOOGLE - Senator MIKE DOHERTY online PETITION against TSA  "STOP INVASIVE SEARCHES"

    Please SIGN

    ILLEGAL Fed bank stole power over USA govt in 1913 - their plan?

    -

    Global enslavement via FEAR. 9/11 & ALL 'bombers' proved FAKES linked to Fed Bank govt

    All presidents since 1913 = owned FAKES or killed for being real.

    TSA is ILLEGAL, against Constitution. KNOW your rights , refuse searches. No matter what they say, REFUSE - it IS illegal - it's 'slave training'

  • GOOGLE - Senator MIKE DOHERTY online PETITION against TSA  "STOP INVASIVE SEARCHES"

    Please SIGN

    ILLEGAL Fed bank stole power over USA govt in 1913 - their plan?

    -

    Global enslavement via FEAR. 9/11 & ALL 'bombers' proved FAKES linked to Fed Bank govt

    All presidents since 1913 = owned FAKES or killed for being real.

    TSA is ILLEGAL, against Constitution. KNOW your rights , refuse searches. No matter what they say, REFUSE - it IS illegal - it's 'slave training'

  • take it off?

  • check for foreskins and jew bommers

  • non pornographic?

    oh i bet in this sick world somone will surely develop a fetish for this!!!!

  • How much did the TSA pay you to kiss their ass CBS? The TSA can go fuck themselves when I go through... pat me down, make it weird for both of us, but I'm not going through a super powered X-ray

  • are these machines cancer enriching to our bodies?

    this is another excuse to punish all humans by taking even more of our freedoms away when clearly it should only be taken from a certain bunch of ppl.

    only them who resemble this bunch should be put through the machine.

  • Big brother is watching!

  • LIARS!!!! They toned this scanner down only for the interview! They are normally tuned to see your privates!

  • Erbody gona stick shit up there ass now lmao!!!

  • This thing should be illegal plain and simple, i'm right and there is nothing anyone can do to change my mind.

    Yes I am quite aware of what I sound like but you know what? I don't give a shit

  • First they LIED about the scanners being able to reverse a image to make it more lifelike.

    Then they LIED about the scanners being able to save an image, (and later found out the machine's specs have a high speed interface.)

    But now the public is supposed to believe them about the radiation!??! Some researchers are already saying pregnant or older people should not be exposed to the machine.

    How many lies do people need to catch these people in before everything they say is suspect?

  • who cares, nobody gives a fuck what 98% of you losers look like naked and i guarantee the guy who has to look at that shit all day cares even less. get over it.

  • Youll get skin cancer!

  • If the machine is not capable of storing anything...um why then use them?!

  • Why could George W have not hijacked greyhound busses for his oil agenda instead??

  • nicknamed 'the peeper' lol

  • RADIATION POISONING...does that get your attention? Those scanners utilize backscatter radiation in a wave length that only touches the skin, not passing through as a normal lab xray does. Several PHDs and physicists have written a document and signed it, sent it to the TSA stating that the scanners are dangerous to any women post breast or lymph cancer, children pre puberty and all people with any form of pre cancer skin problems. The machines have not been sufficiently tested long term.

  • the reporter is trying to make it sound like its al such a good idea. but honestly WHAT A Load OF Bollocks!!! anyone who works at an airport knows how easy it is to get something onto a plane that shouldn't be on there.

  • bollocks!!!!!

  • Oh my God people, stop bitching about this. This whole country has gotten completely pathetic with all its bitching and complaing about stupid shit. Who cares if they can see through clothing, I couldnt care less about somebody looking at my junk. Why does everybody is this sad pathetic country get offened by everything now. FUCK!

  • @petrakryo Because they are taking away our rights as a human. I worked for TSA for six months and it is not for your safty, it is to humiliate you and make you feel like you are nothing. This has nothing to do with making things safe. How would you feel you fought for your countrys freedom and come home to see people being herded like cattle into a michine that looks at you naked. I know you doen't care about people looking at you but I have a problem with them looking at My kids.

  • @jmkaudio Well I do understand where your coming from when you say you dont want them looking at your kids. I dont have any but I supposed that would bother me too if I did. I dont know, I guess I am just kind of laid back to the point where if somebody sees me naked, I dont really care. The only reason I would have a problem with this is if the scanner was bad for your health, example: exposure to radiation.

  • @jmkaudio I can't believe you actually worked for the TSA and you can't spell simple words. Bottom line, if you don't want to go through the scanner or go through the pat down search, THEN TAKE A TRAIN!!!

    I did fight for our freedom, and I have no problem going through a scanner or being searched. You act as if there are child molesters running the machines.

  • I completely agree. Enough of everyone whining about "being seen naked" or being "touched inappropriately" If terrorists brought down another plane, everyone would be complaining that enough wasn't done. I have an implant in my knee and am pat down or scanned every time I fly...it's really no big deal to insure our safety. If you don't want to go through the security, then don't fly!

  • @95ffd . . . And you can assure me there are not child or any molesters running these machines or doing the pat downs? I didn't think so!

  • @commoncents22 No, I can't guarantee that. You act as if some perv is sitting in front of a computer all alone whacking off to images. But going along the lines of your thinking, your child will have less contact with a TSA agent than a school teacher, a gym teacher, school nurse, little league sports coach, NEIGHBOR, do I need to keep going? I had a boss tell me years ago, "don't come bitching to me unless you have a solution!" That holds so true. Everyone is crying that they have rights.

  • @95ffd You may have well hit it on the head with the "some perv sitting. . ." being paid with our tax dollars. I am amazed by the number of reports of teachers and coaches charged with sexual misconduct. I guess I am the only one reading the news. Our tax dollars at work here also. The solution, it is called profiling! So far no one’s grandmother or child has yet stolen or blown up a plane. It’s called common sense. Soon you will hear crying about the rights they used to have. Wise up!

  • this is ridiculous. of course it stores and the whole point is to see through the clothes. they dont keep those jeans on for the photograph. what if she has a bomb in her underwear?

  • "The machines are not capable of storing images" - yea, right.

  • They do look through the bra, pants, and underwear. They turned down the machine so it didn't do that for television so people would go through them. Bullshit liars. 

  • @samtownsley I take it your work for the manufacturer of these machines? I think the simple solution would be for you to take a train or better yet a bus. That way you won't feel so violated.

  • If the machine can't store images, do they just take the word of the person looking at the screen??

  • hmm yah right! i think honestly any pc has a server with a back up this is ridiculous where's our 4th amendment rights!?

  • haha WTF is blurring the face of the person gonna do? it's not gonna stop the pervs from masturbating to whoever they are looking at, they made this law just so they can be pervs and get away with it undetected.

  • @Dr8co1 You act as if someone has all the time in the world and can sit alone in a room and rub one out. They are going through all this expense just so pervs can play at work. Take a bus.

  • @95ffd you must be really blind and unintelligent, it's called covering for each other, yes they probably do have all the time in the world to rub one out, geez use your brain if you have one dude, seriously...

  • Comment removed

  • @stevejones1913 Its a scanner, not superman glasses. Preserve your rights. Take a bus.

  • The commies at 60 minutes could fucking care less about our 4th amendment rights and more about their progressive mock build up of a Nazi state. I am about ready to blow a fuse. when is this tyranny going to end. NEVER.

  • NOT CAPABLE OF STORING IMAGES? Well, not until the record button is pushed. Thousands of these images have "escaped". More government lies.

  • They image isnt saved on the computer but emailed to a court house... and we all know email is safe...

  • @egg246 and @portlanddem

    Yea we're going to take the bus accross the ocean....stupid!

  • hmmm oh yeah cause they can change the resolution on the machine. OF COURSE they arent gonna show you what it can really do. YOU MEDIA: AND APPARENTLY STUPID TOO!

  • I perfer dogs.

  • Doesnt look like it shows anything internal, maybe we should have to have total transparency... Lets crank the tubeheads! A terrorist could pit a tube that terminates in some kind of bladder filled with explosive chemicals up their pee hole or vaginal cavity or anus...

    We are all screwed, one step here, one step there and then its not individuals that inflict injustices, its our whole God damned society.

    /cry

  • yeah lol there is no point in deleting the pictures its going to be saved some how anyway. so if someone did sneek something onto a plane you wont be able to look at that picture to review  how they maniged to sneek it on the plane so they have to keep the pictures

  • I'd rather have some officer see through my stuff in another room than risk dying. Just me. "Safety first!" :D

  • @egg246 You will die one day.. Those officers arn't police men they get paid less the the guy who thakes your garbage away.. nude pictures are a fery "fine" way to improve your income.

    And even those of your children will make a good price on the market.. I guess you can imagen that too.

    So jear "Savety first!" lets get rid of those scanners!

  • @FateMaster2 Pause at 0:37. Do you think that's a big deal? Of course we'll all die at one point in time. I'd rather die peacefully in my sleep than explode in an airplane. If you don't want the scan, take a bus.

  • @egg246 Exactly!

  • Let ALL the world leaders and their spouses and children go through it first to show us how it should be done. It's so easy for them, hiding in their VIP lounges!

  • I remember the puffer/sniffing machines.Why didn't they just improve them?

    Was it about cost? Did they find flaws in them?How is this machine

    going to stop, a woman with silicone(liquid nitro?)breast implants from

    getting on a plane?

  • liessssssssssss.........

  • Can the body scanners suck my dick too or will TSA child molesters hjave to do that manually?

  • @agenthelios1 theyll probably make a separate machine for that

  • @agenthelios1 Thats first class.

  • LIARS!!!! of course the image is stored!! If somebody gets through with a bomb you dont think they will review the images to see what they missed? Who would they hold responsible?  How can you learn the technique without reviewing when you fail? These images are stored and can/will be reviewed later by others. End of story!

  • @flierumph I assume you think a "pat down" is stored as well. If a pat down failed to detect a bomber, they would pull out the floppy disk with the pat down: all the textures felt, bulges etc could be re-experienced with some kind of interface. No need for that right? Secondly if the images were stored but all the lay persons don't have anyway of retrieving the images then as far airport security goes the images aren't stored.

  • @flierumph The image is stored only if there is a necessity for evidence purposes, a scanning tech has to trap the file in order for that to happen. The file isn't a simple JPG, it's a full-sized TIF image that clocks in at about 2gb per side. You could never, ever, EVER store that much data on every traveller forever.

  • @flierumph who cares. oh no someone saw me naked what ill i ever do now

  • @flierumph IF THE TSA HAVE 360 DEGREE VIEW OF YOUR ENTIRE NAKED BODY AND METAL DETECTOR, HOW WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO GET A BOMB THROUGH ANYWAY?

  • @flierumph oh another critical thinking person, your a rare breed nowadays. tell me, how have you been avoiding the stannous fluoride in the water?

  • @datzfast flouride compounds are poisonous to one extent or another. maybe you should get a big dose of the stuff since you think its so harmless, maybe its the thing that ALREADY killed your brain. flourine itself is the nastiest element in the periodic table this side of the heavy naturally radioactivbe stuff. yes critical thinkers are rare because there are so many BRAIN DEAD ppl around like you.THAT is the real problem! Not ppl who dont like government sponsored poisoning of the water.

  • @flierumph Exactly! That's pure BS ladies and gentlemen...

  • @flierumph That is a FUCKING LIE!!!. I agree with everything u jus said. Your being watched, stored, government has all your info so in case you do someething they have everything they want about u and have ur image as well. lets not talk about thumbprints, finger prints, and my favorite traffic signal cameras.

  • @flierumph Oh and it won't register my thumbs up....wouldn't ya know.

  • Molestation or Radiation? That's the price we're now paying for freeDUMB.

  • AMERICAN PATRIOTS: RESIST THE POLICE STATE!

  • Here's a great little girl who stands up to the TSA.

    Search:

    Little girl stands up to TSA!

  • This is from 2008, very out of date. New photos of scans show privates in detail. Also the fake examples with weapons and guns is so whacked out because those items are caught by the meal detectors.

  • @bbeoha From the new photo scans you can see a guy's "package" but they're never shown in newspapers (it's always pics of a woman's body).

  • Disinformation through the mainstream (controlled) media.

  • Of course they can't store images. If they did and someone happened to make it through with contraband the image would be proof of failure.

  • @dvsbmx Apparently you have heard of the over 100 scanned images that were leaked over the internet recently, genital details and all. The TSA has already stated that the machines are able to save any and all images taken, but that they "choose" not to, except for training purposes (so actually they do).

  • gee, i better start working out

  • @nativeskygirl lmfaoo thats exactly what i was thinking

  • @nativeskygirl I got a more than half-way decent body ha ha ha.

  • Kip Hawley has been gone from TSA for more than a year. This is a very old report and not the same scanners in use today.

  • CBS - COMPLETELY BIASED S**T

  • Anybody can take a phone photo of the image, go home and reverse the negative image into a full color and detail picture in Photoshop.

  • Of course they won't store the images, because we are NOT in a litigous society. If someone "got through" the system, no one would want to look at the images of people that went through the scanner. It's ok our government has never lied to us before so I guess I'll just go back to my coma.

  • That image looks so "doctored", I find it hard to believe anyone bought this 60 minutes segment at face value. You screwed up 60 minutes, I have less faith in your journalism integrity than I did before.

  • boo shit

  • I know passengers that carried knives after 9/11 and believe me we were not in any increased danger by their doing so. Since 99.9999999% of us are not terrorists it is actually safer to make things a little less predictable for anybody wanting to attack an aircraft.

    This only serves to make it more obvious what a terrorist can expect if they were to attempt takeover/attack of an aircraft. At the expense of 99.99999% innocents... Who does that serve??

  • Parents who submit minor children to this nude photography (temporarily inverted) are UNFIT.

    Report them to their priest, other family members or CPS.

  • @votingronpaul2008 Heck, drop them off with the priest. I would be willing to be more priest have molested children than TSA agents.

  • Still think the guy on this CBS News interview is truthful?

    Simply google  "fed admits images stored"

  • Here we are a few years later and the images are available everywhere on the net. Is any other network except Fox informing the public about this? Is CBS telling its viewers that frequent fliers will be regularly exposed to radiation, or TSA agents will be groping your 14 yr old daughter when you'd rather she not be digitally strip searched? Don't believe it? Research it yourself. CBS sure as hell isn't reporting the REAL news. They're more interested in the royal engagement.

  • at the end criminals will find an alternative way to do their "job" and this procedure will only affect legal people

  • The Patriot Act = turning citizens into SUSPECTS since 2001

  • And Muslim women will not be searched?

    Napolitano and Obama are psychopaths.

    Secure the borders.

    Profile passengers.

    Stop the nionsense.

  • @SirWinstonChurchill There is no exception for Muslims in airport security procedures.

  • Well we now know this is not true.

  • i honestly don't give a shit if some body sees me naked. i like the idea of getting frisked a little less but i understand that its for my saftey and it probably sucks more for the dude that has to do the search, and it's not really that bad anyways. the part i don't get is the see through clothing but not underwear part, that sounds like bullshit. i don't really understand the machine but if i had to guess i'd say it measured density and underwear and regular wear would be the same, but i dunno

  • I dont understand what all the fuss is about.. You want to fly safely, that is what matters. I am not at all embarrased or whatever if a TSA guy touches my junk . The crotch area is an excellent place to hide something so I hope they check it to catch any lunies.

  • @MrPaulo4847 You don't see a problem with strangers grabbing your child's genitals? Are you a pedophile? Only a child molestor would say something like what you said.

  • @JesusManson323 And you've seen TSA agents grabbing children's genitals? Or your just using that as an excuse? It's a pat down search, not a genital grabbing search. So why not have the child go through the scanner? Better yet, save us all the headaches and take a bus.

  • Id rather get stripped searched virtually by a person in a locked room rather then stripped search the old fashion way. And that isnt enough i'd rather get stripped searched then bombed on a plane because they chose not to do the search. IM just saying i value my life alot more then this safety i mean like. There are textbooks in school that are more detailed then those X- Rays. Yes people balls and dick and boobs and all that stuff are included. you guys are being ridiculous. Might as well die.

  • Women should put a potato in their undies. It's not against the law!

  • If everyone flying this holiday season and is selected for the full body scan, opts for the pat down instead, we can break the system and overwhelm The Stupid Administration.

  • @Paulsur No, you'll simply miss your flight. Why not save us the time and take a bus???

  • @95ffd No I wil show up early enogh not to miss anything. In fact, when I recently traveled to Taiwan, that is what I did. Comparison, between The Stupid Agency, and Japanese security at Narita was night and day. They are more detailed, clearly better trained, and more customer service oriented. another failed example of the U.S. federal gov't.

  • Fuck the TSA!

  • Liars! They have adjusted the machine to show an image less invasive than the reality. Other news programs confirm this. It's age old propaganda, and mainstream media is doing what is does best, supporting the government agenda, rather than doing real investigative journalism. We're in a lot of trouble. Once this is mandatory and compulsory, there is no stopping it. And how about in a couple years, when they must insert a gloved finger in your ass? How much is too much people?

  • sorry to say, that perverted dude will download copies of the pics and then run it through photoshop and invert all the pics and get the original naked bodies.

  • They didn't do a man's body. It shows the balls and penis clearly.

  • What airport do you know will let anyone go into the security and see how it is being run? I think this was a set up to try and give us a false sense that this is okay. Why was she wearing gloves if all she does is look at a monitor?

  • @a2evomr She was wearing a glove because she was masturbating herself with that gloved hand to herself while, looking at the other females passengers who got told they had to be subjected to the virtual-strip-raping-x-ray-sea­rch-method-masturbating-genita­l-secreting-ejaculating-induci­ng-machine.

  • Leslie Stahl, I was a waiter at a private party 10 years ago where you were a guest. You farted.

    You tried to cover it up by moving across the room, but your toxic chemtrail followed you.

    Your journalism is like your fart; all lies and stink .

    TRUE STORY!

  • freedom from freedom - dr who, READ 1984

  • "but not through your underwear" LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE! LIE!

    4th Amendment - Freedom from Unreasonable Search and Seizure!

    If you wanna let people strip search you, tell them they have to remove your clothes to do it.

  • They use these on children also. Legalized child porn! it DOES show more than your bra. You can tell if a man is circumcised; it is VERY detailed. FUCK THIS PROPAGANDA!

  • Stop being a pussy my ass. It's NOT okay to be strip searched if you want to board an aircraft!!!!!!! WTF is wrong with you idiot Americans? And what happened to the fourth amendment? F*cking Chertoff is CEO of one of these companies who are making these effing naked body scanners! Wake the f*ck up Americans. Here are the basics; 911 was orchestrated to set up their police state, plain and simple, your government does not love you, and they want you dead.

  • so maybe if some sicko peeping tom peers inside her window but only sees her in her underwear, she will be cool with it? Maybe give him her bag to look through too, and let him feel her breasts and grab her genitals before he leaves? It's all for a worthy cause, in raising our next generation of TSA agents.... Oh, I forgot, he has to blur the face on the pictures he took.... then its cool :)

  • mainstream media is like floride...producing more stupid,dumbed down fools.

    That image was invasive enough for me. Go get yourself an exray Mrs Stahl. Fun fun fun! The gov't really cares about us and they want to protect us HAHAHAHAAHAHA! Idiots! Wait til its a full blown police state and they randomly show up at your house to make sure you are not molesting your children! Google Katherine Albrecht..the "RFID" lady and get informed!!

  • just goes to show that if you want to be humiliated at the airport, just allow your country to stick its nose where it don't belong.

  • If it means I get through airport security faster, I don't give two shits who's looking at my dick.

  • cancer is on the rise...I wonder why!?

  • LIES !!!!!

  • actually it was just discovered in florida they were storing some of these photos so they CAN be stored and if inverted these photos look like normal pictures keep looking and youll find the inverted photo that looks like a completely naked girl with her arms out