Added: 2 years ago
From: CBS
Views: 375
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This is a joke, are they serious dont they know about the pole shifts. Oh yeah they do they just dont want us to know about it.

    Global worming huh.

  • That "scientist" is a fucking hippy. I hate hippies.

  • i hate BRAINWASHED fukheads like u mF

  • Shut up hippy.

  • "the global warming swindle"

    watch that documentary, and then judge for yourself

  • then watch "global warming swindle DEBATE pt1" and pt2

    then feel like a SUCKER for OIL, IDIOT

  • This language isn't necessary.

    I am trying to research the matter scientifically, instead of following one cult or the other.

    And thanks for the pointer. I'll look at it.

  • Global warming remains UNPROVEN as of now. Also, the "scientist(s)" mentioned remain a small majority of most of the scientists, most of whom don't give any reasonable credit to the hypothesis of Global Warming.

    Global warming is, in fact, widely accepted as a natural cycle, but not as a human-caused effect. Scientists have yet to find a correlation between levels of carbon dioxide and global temperatures. Al Gore may have found one, but he ain't no SCIENTIST.

  • 98% of scientists with relevant training in climatology agree that climate change IS due to human causes. Those are the facts.

  • Saying those are the facts does not prove it. Citing the facts to an unbiased source (ex. NOT A NEWSPAPER) proves factual accuracy.

    My facts come from three sources:

    Gallup . com

    NOAA . gov

    GISS.NASA . gov

    Now please, go back up your sources.

    In any case, I PERSONALLY know that few of the climatologists in the New York/Boston area agrees with human-caused global warming. They wrote articles about it on their respective websites.

    @ Yale, Columbia, CUNY, MIT, Princeton

    (Not just one).

  • In any case, "relevance" to climatology is subjective. They said that UPENN guy had the "relevant training", when he did law. That guy from the University of Colorado (or something, who was famous for stating that ice caps were melting) had a degree in ARTS and ENGLISH and NOTHING ELSE. Even then, the environmental organizations gave him credit for "relevant training".

    The gallup survey, totally unbiased (as it actually CHECKS if people had relevant training), provided my info. Nuff said.

  • reference?

  • we have to act soon!!!!!! or it's going to be too late

  • Okay folks. This Global Warming crap is a hoax. It's just a natural cycle we are in. I do agree that maybe humans are speeding it up a little bit, but it's still a natural trends. These are the same crack head scientists who said back in the 70's I recall said that we were going to enter an ice age back then.

  • Global Warning is just something for the Liberals to complain about so they can spend even more of our money. Yay for trying to make money a quick fix for everything! Everything is now worthless!

  • the nd of the world is coming!!

  • Global warming is a money making lie.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more