Nice to see you back. Thanks for taking the time to respond, your response was interesting as usual.
For #1 you and I disagree on a couple of things, like whether miracles should violate the laws of nature, or that an idea can only be accepted if there is no way to take it another way, or the possibility of disproving God (but obviously we will disagree on some things).
I am impressed w/ the answers to question 3. Your answer to that was common, but it was not one I expected to hear very often.
Your answer to #4 was also a bit unexpected, but pretty cool.
My wording for question 5 was terrible.. unfortunately, but I liked your answer it was pretty insightful. I wish I would have annotated that question earlier, because a lot of people had trouble understanding what I meant.
Nice to see you back. Thanks for taking the time to respond, your response was interesting as usual.
For #1 you and I disagree on a couple of things, like whether miracles should violate the laws of nature, or that an idea can only be accepted if there is no way to take it another way, or the possibility of disproving God (but obviously we will disagree on some things).
Epydemic2020 1 year ago
@Epydemic2020
I am impressed w/ the answers to question 3. Your answer to that was common, but it was not one I expected to hear very often.
Your answer to #4 was also a bit unexpected, but pretty cool.
My wording for question 5 was terrible.. unfortunately, but I liked your answer it was pretty insightful. I wish I would have annotated that question earlier, because a lot of people had trouble understanding what I meant.
Epydemic2020 1 year ago