How to change history, fake plane in WTC 1 911 footage

[mrawsome2122]

in my own opion the goverment killed san bil laden cause they did not want the media to ask questions on what really happen. or did they kill him. they prombly lied about killing him so they know. where to look for other people like him and stop from 9/11 happening all over again but here is the question that needs to be answered what hit the wtc and were is san bil laden.

[xeli1994x]

something crashed into the twintowers, but i dont think it was a passenger plane.......

[dburnhamd]

The only thing fake is your entire argument. F'in truthers. The truth is your a fuckin nutjob

[Espmell]

These fake videos are starting to piss me of. Look at the original video from the Zacarias Moussaoui trial and you'll see the plane clear as daylight! Fucking truther retards!

[door32]

@Espmell please post a link to back that up if you could, thankyou

[Espmell]

@door32 w w w .vaed. uscourts.gov/notablecases/mous­saoui/exhibits/prosecution/P20­0015.html

[quez76]

@Espmell this link doesnt work

[Espmell]

@quez76 w w w .vaed. uscourts.gov/notablecases/mous­saoui/exhibits/prosecution.htm­l

Remove the spaces in the adress!

Go down to P200015 Compilation of videotape of the World Trade Center taken on September 11, 2001

[quez76]

@Espmell it says page cannot be found. can you give me a direct link?

[quez76]

@Espmell nevermind i got it...

[webfairy2]

The original video was edited in many different ways.

in the Taner version, the whatzit moves backward for one frame.

Calling the first hit "fake" is covering up their in-your-face how they did it lesson.

The footage has frames removed, poor continuity, monkeycamming, and heavy processing before it reached the state we are familiar with on the DVD. This does not make it fake. It is real footage of a real event doctored up. Strange is not the same as fake.

[door32]

@webfairy2 Hmmmm, but how does that explain the original having no discernable image of a plane, yet the revised version having something completely new it that could be mistaken for a plane?

[webfairy2]

@door32 You are comparing two different edits, both "old.".

A shadow passes for a plane wing in a couple of frames with no continuity.

webfairy dot org slash noplane shows several diffent edits.

[door32]

@webfairy2 well exactly my point. Why are there more than one version of the film. It is not possible to have different versions of the same film that was shown on CNN that day unless they are being tampered with. The CNN version is the original and shows nothing, so where is the questioning of the existence of any other version?

[webfairy2]

@door32 editing footaqe in different ways certainly shows it was "tampered with."

webfairy dot org slash noplane

[naudetsleuth]

They are the same video at two different CRAPPY resolutions. NEITHER version shows an airplane. It is genuine footage, there was just no plane there. The BEST resolution is the Naudet dvd, which is the source of the frames at

tinyurl com/flashframe

tinyurl com/flashframefoursome

[door32]

@naudetsleuth Thankyou, I will check those out