I hope this is a joke, and not serious. We didn't oppose spending under Bush because he wasn't as much of a communist, who wanted healthcare provided to the poor paid by the rich. Just like Dumbocunts don't oppose the wars under Obama, because they are racists against white people. Simple.
@RonaldReaganRocks1 Bush did spend and borrow more than Obama. So, that is okay? Or is it because he's a Democrat and black as well. Don't call me black, I'm white.
im sorry for american nationalists that interpret this the wrong wayt, btu america doesnt have great combinations of capitolism and socialism, in other countries that have universal healthcare, everyone is able to get treatment without going broke, if america had that sort of system, i would be very content to know that, and would greatefully acknowledge the progress that would have been done.
i respect tea baggers in the sense that theyre standing up for something they believe in voicing they disaproval of the government, in a grassroots process. but what annoys me like david schuster said, is they theyre clearly partisan, at least most of them are. if theyre not, then where were they during the bush years when tax hikes went to the rich and bush spent out the budget surplus? i mean obama clearly said that middle class americans wont see their taxes increase by even a penny.
2 hundred to 4 hundred billion dollars a year in borrowing is a far cry from 1.3 TRILLION in 9 months. We are printing money. INFLATION is on the way. 20$ a loaf of bread anyone?
NO because some are founded to help such as the college fund. Yes the no whites allowed does. But what scares me is that its a protest that shows our nation is still divided. Not just as liberal conservative, but the races still appear seperated. Does that make sense?
All of the bailouts were in 2008, Obama has nothing to do with any of this, your just blaiming Obama for Bush's crap. This whole "democrats hate constitution" thing going on is pathetic. George Bush raped the constitution (Gitmo, Iraq war, wiretaps, etc.) if your looking for somewhere to protest i know a great little place in Crawford Texas.
next time, take you head out of your ass long enough to do research.
he lives in dallas now bush did not pass the bail out they were still against it untill Mr Obama jump in to it also During Bushes Reighn our Ecohnmy was doing Very well till 2008 when Mr Clition sifh a few Polices that Cougt up to us
@ipodvideo Uh, only the original TARP was signed by Bush. Many conservatives didn't like Bush's spending. But hmm, who had control of Congress the last two years of Bush's term? You do know what Congress is, don't you?
Further, Obama tripled the Bush debt in a matter of months. Nothing about "Gitmo" is unconstitutional. Neither was the Iraq war. Please state the passages in the Constitution that Bush "raped".
@ipodvideo For the record, if you want to take YOUR head out of your ass:
As for the deficit, CBO shows that over the first three years of the Obama Presidency, 2009-2011, the federal government will borrow an estimated $3.7 trillion. That is more than the entire accumulated national debt for the first 225 years of U.S. history. By 2019, the interest payments on this debt will be larger than the budget for education, roads and all other nondefense discretionary spending.
@ToyKingWonder For the record. Bush raised the debt more than Obama, This Obama raised the debt more than all other presidents combined is a Conservative lie propaganda. There' s too much of it. We need to stop it. Quit watching FAKENEWS FOX!
@jrwel14 Let me dumb it down for you a bit: When Obama took over, we were at $10T in debt, in less than two years Obama has increased that almost by another 1/2 to over $14T. That doesn't include all that ObamaCare will do to the debt. The CBO numbers I stated above are from the CBO, not Fox. No one argues that Bush didn't spend too much, one reason why he is not a true conservative. Do I need to go to 5th grade level for you, or do you grasp the numbers yet?
@ToyKingWonder Get mine from Government sources. Bush took a huge surplus and created a huge debt. Which amounted to 10 trillion in 32 weeks. From the CBO."the Bush administration has transformed, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a ten-year projected surplus of $5.6 trillion to a deficit of $4.4 trillion: a turnaround of $10 trillion in roughly 32 months."
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012
brostorm598 1 month ago
teabagging is awesome. Drop your nuts in there mouths
1979audiman 3 months ago
Tea-bagging means something entirely different here in the UK
DaMuttzNutz 9 months ago
I hope this is a joke, and not serious. We didn't oppose spending under Bush because he wasn't as much of a communist, who wanted healthcare provided to the poor paid by the rich. Just like Dumbocunts don't oppose the wars under Obama, because they are racists against white people. Simple.
RonaldReaganRocks1 1 year ago
@RonaldReaganRocks1 Bush did spend and borrow more than Obama. So, that is okay? Or is it because he's a Democrat and black as well. Don't call me black, I'm white.
jrwel14 6 months ago
Anyone who uses the term "tea bag" is a moron, so your contribution has about as much credibility as Mao's dead ass.
Listen to the oral fixation this douchbag has throughout this piece. Notice his constant use of teabagging. And teabag on the titles.
I can't wait to see these droolbags in November.
Man, talk about projection. This guy wants it in his mouth, and is sexually excited about his opportunity to talk about his most innermost thoughts.
November shall be so fun.
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
Anyone who uses the term "tea bag" is a moron, so your contribution has about as much credibility as Mao's dead ass.
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
@ToyKingWonder but YOU just used the term "tea***" OMG does that mean that youre Mao's dead ass?!
dchris1990 1 year ago
@dchris1990 No, what it means is you want my member in your mouth, which I am saving for my wedding night. So you can't have it now so stop asking.
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
Okay, I can't tell if this is supposed to be serious due to all of the hilarious sexual innuendo.
GreekRockr9 1 year ago
According to these idiot tea-baggers, anytime you disagree with them, you automatically are called a socialist! As if socialism is so evil!
Hey, don't get Medicare when you get sick then because that is a social program!
Where were these tea-baggers when Bush was wasting our money looking for weapons of mass deception?!
GTO071 1 year ago
im sorry for american nationalists that interpret this the wrong wayt, btu america doesnt have great combinations of capitolism and socialism, in other countries that have universal healthcare, everyone is able to get treatment without going broke, if america had that sort of system, i would be very content to know that, and would greatefully acknowledge the progress that would have been done.
Blair63B 1 year ago
How do you Flag a vid for stupidity?
These losers at MSNBC have no better ammo than to slander a competitor?
And tell a multitude of lies about a movement with independent roots in hundreds of communities.
Kinda humorous. As early as Spring 2009 MSNBC was already fearing the backlash of Truth overwhelming their propaganda efforts.
maskedphrogg 1 year ago
i respect tea baggers in the sense that theyre standing up for something they believe in voicing they disaproval of the government, in a grassroots process. but what annoys me like david schuster said, is they theyre clearly partisan, at least most of them are. if theyre not, then where were they during the bush years when tax hikes went to the rich and bush spent out the budget surplus? i mean obama clearly said that middle class americans wont see their taxes increase by even a penny.
joinalbin 1 year ago
Piss on those morons!
Balldez 2 years ago
glenn beck should forcfully be put in a mental hospital!!!!!!
mercuryrulz 2 years ago 3
That's very unfair
(...on the Mental Hospital that would be forced to accept him).
Silberdachs 2 years ago 2
Teabag themselves?!? That sounds lonely and desperate for lovin'. Oh those "TeaBaggers!"
agentd5417 2 years ago
these two assholes put a new definition to douchebaggery
btwall60 2 years ago
2 hundred to 4 hundred billion dollars a year in borrowing is a far cry from 1.3 TRILLION in 9 months. We are printing money. INFLATION is on the way. 20$ a loaf of bread anyone?
btwall60 2 years ago
yay for reports that target 14 year old liberal teens..
Seriously, it's no wonder most Americans are fucking retarded - they listen to morons like this "reporter".
Billpete002 2 years ago
@Billpete002 ohhh right. im guessing u watch unbiased, honest reporters on fox news then...
joinalbin 1 year ago
WOW. What a fucking immature report. Ive never seen such a sad display of "professionalism"
dudeman1109 2 years ago
THE real threat is HR 1207 "AUDIT THE FED" they are a private bank who have never had a audit !
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 2 years ago
How can you spend 3 trillions and lower taxes ?
the real taxees is every thing the goverment spend
vince8520 2 years ago
Google:
"Bush Deficit vs. Obama Deficit in Pictures"
Don't believe the lies.
Slegarthoth 2 years ago
I"m not racist at all. Dont get me wrong. but it somewhat scares me that all these tea baggers are all white.
jeriquo13 2 years ago 2
Does it scare you that there's a National Black Caucus? Whites NOT allowed?
Does it scare you that there is a National Association for the Advancment of Colored People...NAACP?
How about the United Negro College Fund?
Or do you believe there are 'special' classes of people that should get special rights and consideration simply due to their skin color?
BloodTar 2 years ago
NO because some are founded to help such as the college fund. Yes the no whites allowed does. But what scares me is that its a protest that shows our nation is still divided. Not just as liberal conservative, but the races still appear seperated. Does that make sense?
Thats why i said don take it the wrong way. ;)
jeriquo13 2 years ago
They were a pretty "SPECIAL" class when they were treated worse than dogs, weren't they? Were people like you hollering for equality then?
drumrnva 2 years ago
don't forget! BET TV.....Ebony Magazine and ...on and on
muiere2 2 years ago
Why have these conservatives not protested against Bush's spending and the Pentagon's flushing $2 trillion of taxpayers money down the toilet?
If its wasting taxpayers money they are upset about, their targets should be the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve, and Goldman Sachs.
Relugus 2 years ago 10
@Relugus
Oh they have, believe me, they have. This asshole on tv conveniently leaves that out about the tea party.
The Bush bailouts did nothing. Obama's spending bill did nothing.
now he wants a new bill. what makes them think it will make a difference?
BeyondLame 4 months ago
But he's still right :D
ethdude 2 years ago
All of the bailouts were in 2008, Obama has nothing to do with any of this, your just blaiming Obama for Bush's crap. This whole "democrats hate constitution" thing going on is pathetic. George Bush raped the constitution (Gitmo, Iraq war, wiretaps, etc.) if your looking for somewhere to protest i know a great little place in Crawford Texas.
next time, take you head out of your ass long enough to do research.
ipodvideo 2 years ago 8
I completely agree.
whoyouare13 2 years ago
he lives in dallas now bush did not pass the bail out they were still against it untill Mr Obama jump in to it also During Bushes Reighn our Ecohnmy was doing Very well till 2008 when Mr Clition sifh a few Polices that Cougt up to us
DHK59 2 years ago
@ipodvideo Obama supported and voted for all of the bailouts while in the Senate. He is just as much to blame as one one else.
NCdawg00 1 year ago
@ipodvideo Uh, only the original TARP was signed by Bush. Many conservatives didn't like Bush's spending. But hmm, who had control of Congress the last two years of Bush's term? You do know what Congress is, don't you?
Further, Obama tripled the Bush debt in a matter of months. Nothing about "Gitmo" is unconstitutional. Neither was the Iraq war. Please state the passages in the Constitution that Bush "raped".
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
@ipodvideo For the record, if you want to take YOUR head out of your ass:
As for the deficit, CBO shows that over the first three years of the Obama Presidency, 2009-2011, the federal government will borrow an estimated $3.7 trillion. That is more than the entire accumulated national debt for the first 225 years of U.S. history. By 2019, the interest payments on this debt will be larger than the budget for education, roads and all other nondefense discretionary spending.
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
@ToyKingWonder For the record. Bush raised the debt more than Obama, This Obama raised the debt more than all other presidents combined is a Conservative lie propaganda. There' s too much of it. We need to stop it. Quit watching FAKENEWS FOX!
jrwel14 6 months ago
@jrwel14 Let me dumb it down for you a bit: When Obama took over, we were at $10T in debt, in less than two years Obama has increased that almost by another 1/2 to over $14T. That doesn't include all that ObamaCare will do to the debt. The CBO numbers I stated above are from the CBO, not Fox. No one argues that Bush didn't spend too much, one reason why he is not a true conservative. Do I need to go to 5th grade level for you, or do you grasp the numbers yet?
ToyKingWonder 6 months ago
@ToyKingWonder Get mine from Government sources. Bush took a huge surplus and created a huge debt. Which amounted to 10 trillion in 32 weeks. From the CBO."the Bush administration has transformed, according to the Congressional Budget Office, a ten-year projected surplus of $5.6 trillion to a deficit of $4.4 trillion: a turnaround of $10 trillion in roughly 32 months."
jrwel14 6 months ago
Comment removed
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
Comment removed
ToyKingWonder 1 year ago
This was about trying to reignite the conservative movement, not taxes or spending.
Charlieinamerica 2 years ago
Reigniting it in the best way they know how...with a staged lie.
rocas511 2 years ago
Fucking idiot sheeple.
PerfectlyDunce2 2 years ago
According to you, a group of conservatives get together and they're, in your words, "Fucking idiot sheeple".
What would your opinion of them be if they were liberals?
Just curious..
LeftyStrat 2 years ago
lol his voice cracks at 1:02
mylz88 2 years ago
i would say that about matthews and shultz not the other 2
obamawill2008 2 years ago
Shuster is right, but I find both him and Olbermann too vindictive and partisan and kind of up their own pompous butts.
Staticnz 2 years ago