I don't see why people slam this netbook for having a Celeron. A Celeron is faster than an Atom, 'nuff said. Clockspeed isn't everything. It may be 1.3 GHz, but the Celeron used is based on the new 45nm Core 2 derivative.
The Atom processors are half as fast as a similarly-clocked Pentium M, which are in turn slower than a similarly clocked Core 2 Solo (or its derivatives).
the ghz isn't the most important thing. It's the architecture of the processor that determines how well it performs. like a 1.6ghz core i7 is faster than a 2.0ghz core 2 duo.
I did some research and I found a pretty interesting websites with some benchmarks. The 900mhz intel celeron beat the atom 1.6ghz out by 20 seconds on the super pi benchmark. So the 1.3ghz celeron would probably do much better.
you can run a 64bit on a 2gig -.-. windows 7 doesn't need a powerful computer anyways compared to vista.
System Requirements
1 gigahertz (GHz) or faster 32-bit (x86) or 64-bit (x64) processor 1 gigabyte (GB) RAM (32-bit) or 2 GB RAM (64-bit)
16 GB available hard disk space (32-bit) or 20 GB (64-bit)
DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver
WhiteRaven21 2 years ago
64 bit and 2Gigs ram? Fail
akelaristera 2 years ago 2
stfu there is nothin wrong with 64 bit on a system with less than 4 gb of ram.
Maybe it is so you can stick another 2gb stick of ram in there?
Dumbass.
marcyboy123 2 years ago
the usb port is HUGE!
3doog 2 years ago
how the heck can it have 2 gb and run 64 bit?
JohnRazic 2 years ago
I don't see why people slam this netbook for having a Celeron. A Celeron is faster than an Atom, 'nuff said. Clockspeed isn't everything. It may be 1.3 GHz, but the Celeron used is based on the new 45nm Core 2 derivative.
The Atom processors are half as fast as a similarly-clocked Pentium M, which are in turn slower than a similarly clocked Core 2 Solo (or its derivatives).
ImprezzaImpressions 2 years ago 3
What is the best CPU right now?
JamieMckinley 2 years ago
boooooo! throw it away!
souther 2 years ago
Celeron is shit
EricssonsProductions 2 years ago
wow 1.3 Ghz Celeron
2009
my 2001 desktop has a Celeron 1.20 Ghz
i can overclock to 1.36 ghz
wow
i sorry Windows 7 Will Fail on a slow CPU
SpeedSwordCarbon 2 years ago
lol ya, still better than the atom tho
steven4570 2 years ago
the only thing that ruined the laptop was the celoren
gman4141007 2 years ago
I'd rather buy a netbook than that
gman4141007 2 years ago
1.3 ghz??! isnt an atom a 1.6 or 1.66 ghz?!
nelson1tom 2 years ago
its a Celeron
Sharukh007 2 years ago
yeah my point is that it is like a downgrade from an atom
nelson1tom 2 years ago
the ghz isn't the most important thing. It's the architecture of the processor that determines how well it performs. like a 1.6ghz core i7 is faster than a 2.0ghz core 2 duo.
blackghost1011 2 years ago
if the cleron is a single core them im pretty sure its worse then the atoms because of the lower clocks
and i think archuticture really only matters with multi core processors
like my i7 @ 3.8ghz is better than a core 2 quad at 3.8 ghz
plz correct me if im wrong cuz im not positive on the number of cores on the celeron and such
nelson1tom 2 years ago
I did some research and I found a pretty interesting websites with some benchmarks. The 900mhz intel celeron beat the atom 1.6ghz out by 20 seconds on the super pi benchmark. So the 1.3ghz celeron would probably do much better.
blackghost1011 2 years ago
holy crap
20 second difference??!
atoms must REALLY suck
nelson1tom 2 years ago
1.3 Ghz...Celeron...ew
w1l24 2 years ago
AWW MAN I LOVE THE GAYWATES!
Maj2004 2 years ago
yeahhh LOL
mourajini 2 years ago
GAYWATE LAPTOP FTW
iOWNu1111 2 years ago
just if it had nvidia 9400m
DarthScape 2 years ago 2
Nice video.
cusinndzl 2 years ago
Did he say "Gaywate" in the intro?
GlenrothesFTW 2 years ago 3
Gaywate notebooks are gay.
GCVos 2 years ago
I am tired of all the netbook and notebooks.
BURN THEM ALL!!!
1993gtx 2 years ago