Comparing this to a Atom bomb is like comparing a "mighty mite or blacc cat" firecraccer to a 16inch Display shell!! You cannot compare them by any means...
I think there's still a major difference in terms of VoD. Military high-explosives only get to around 10,000m/s, while nuclear detonation is in exess of 100,000m/s.
Could a fleet limp back home after taking a near miss from a nuclear tipped weapon? Could a sufficiently "hardened" fleet still have any combat capabilities in such an event? Would that completely take them out?
Important questions to answer when planning long term strategy against a nuclear armed opponent.
Its interesting you can see the TNT detonating (black smoke due to not enough oxygen in TNT for complete combustion) but the billowing flame stuff is not detonation maybe there was something else in the charge or maybe it's just an effect you get with such a big mass of TNT ?
This blast occurred on the island of Kaho'olawe. I've been on the island and there is still a huge hole this blast made. Just to the west of this blast is the nicest beach on the island.
The island area is about 45 square miles. A hole 250 feet in diameter well not effect the water table at all.
Average rainfall is about 9 inches a year, it's a dessert island.
I live 12 miles away my windows would rattle, when the Navy dropped 500 lbs bombs. That was in the 80's .
Im sure this was a while ago, but stuff like this is why I dont worry about my "carbon footprint" or other nonsense. Why recycle a bottle when the military will just blow some shit up and ruin that thought. You can drive your hybrid, but what is the point when some semi truck spews exhaust all over the damn place right next to you.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This is trash...Nobody can explain me that these tests are good for what? To see how a ship damaged? Oh dude!....Your country have to much money or someone in your military was boring...
I hope you know you are a dumb ass...the first blast was in WHITE SANDS...USA about 4000 mi from your BOMBED home land...AND for your feeble mind, more people died during Pearl Harbar than 9-11...Not 1 preson or building was harmed in these blasts n your home land...Second the other few blasts took place off the coast of the BIKINI ISLANDS...I think the best thing for you would be to smoke some weed and quit hating the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm not an idiot. As a matter of fact, I'm highly educated. I have not used a single swear word in my previous comment. Please take your foul language elsewhere.
If you would like to continue this discussion, send me a message.
If you ever come to Hawaii, leave that attitude at home. If not, surely your time here will be cut short.
The tsar bomb detonate at 3lm high and the shockwave went around the world 3 times. I wonder if these ships can stand against such an explosion. Those Russians..
it was actually 100 megatons, it was scaled down to 50M by using a lead outer for the test instead of U238 due to the worry of fallout spreading outside ussr territory.
Look at that navy ships still floating NAVY HELL YEA the titanic got dropped from and iceberg our ships can float thru this i hate to see what it takes to sink one hope im never around to see it lol
I'd like you to know there is no intricate cave system in Afghanistan otherwise the US would've corenered and destroyed them. The mountains have passes which are used for fighters to cross in and out of Afghanistan from Pakistan. A few caves double up as small weapons stores but that is the extent of it. The real war is in Pakistan.
(FROM THE SERVAILENCE BLIMP B): "Bob do you think we are far enough away?" ......
"ARE YOU SERIOUS? NOTHING CAN REACH US OUT HERE. IT WOULD TAKE A..........(GULP).......
"HOW LONG UNTIL THEY DETONATE IT?"
"I DONT KNOW...... OHHHHHH SSSSHHHIIIII......... whhhummpp!!!!( sound of pillow getting shoot with a rocket launcher or a jelly Bismark falling 50 stories)
Bear in mind that most of that energy is expended as radiation --- mostly heat.
In terms of their actual explosive power, nuclear weapons are extremely inefficient. That's not to say they aren't powerful or cost-effective, but rather that their firepower figures can be misleading.
only a very small amount of energy is converted to radiation..as for the heat it is released in any kind of explosive material when it is detonated and the actual "explosion" is gas expanding under the presure created by the thermal enerjy(heat)..so nuclear weapons have nearly equal firepower to conventional ones
if i put it this way, if you anchored something miles into the ground the bomb went off, do you think the vacuum would crush the remains of the things that didn't get blown away or melted?
@liam1234123121 The destruction from a nuke comes mainly from the soundwave... people close to the explosion just burn up due to the intense heat butthe size of the explosion is tiny compared to the damage of the nuke itself hence the test to see just how destructive a nuke is... they placed the ships nice and close to the "small" explosion because thats the effect of a nuke from a much larger distance anyway... obviously stronger to the center.
Thats a crap comparisome to a nuke even if the ships survived the blast in the center of a nuclular blast the heat it 7 times as much as the sun apserlutly nothing would survive. But after all that no one would survive because the radiation would kill the people in a matter of hours. shows how much amercans care about there soldiers. ooo protect the oil and our nukes fucking twats
This isnt even comparable to nuclear bombs, The smallest nuclear bombs are 12kt, which is 12,000 tonnes of explosives ; And the largest detonated was ~50MT Which is 50,000,000 Tonnes of TNT
Tsar bomba was 50-60 megatons (with tons I mean METRIC tons not the fking pathetic units you americans use!) you ignorant fool! And you think the world would not have noticed if something bigger would go off? Right... The tsar bomba made a shockwave that broke windows 1000 kilometres away from detonation and much more.
What are those fastly changing clouds at 0:28? Is that because of the pressure raises then lowers rapidly and the water condensates then evaporates again?
Daaaaannngg!! That must have used RDX for that. I make RDX. RDX has a explosion rate of 8600 m/s while TNT does 7300m/s! And RDX costs much much less than TNT and takes a lot less time to make than TNT. And it is much more dangerous that TNT.
HAHAH. i reamber watching a video, were they said to duck under your desk and cover ur head. if there was a threat of a nuclear bomb.!! i dont think that would do much.!!
SNOWBALL when a 500 ton hemispherical charge was detonated successfully. Operation SAILOR HAT in 1965. Block built charges were now stacked in this geometry. A number of such 500 ton charges were detonated on military test operations, namely PRAIRE FLAT (1968), DIAL PACK (1970), and MIXED COMPANY (1972).
Google "sailor hat test" for exact information on this blast. 500 tons of TNT was stacked in a hemi-sphere configuration, 17 ft high by 30+ ft wide and detonated, no ANFO was used. Explosives itself cost over $1M and proved unsatisfactory for nuclear simulation because of inconsistency expansion rates between cases of explosive. It produces a multitude of shock effect as compared to a single nuclear event. That is why ANFO is now prefered and is cheaper too.
Actually high explosives have a much higher brissance than your typical nuclear bomb. A 500 ton nuclear blast at the same distance would cause different forms of damage and contamination, but would not be likely to cause as severe a blast. The radiation flux would have been severe at such a close range.
I hate that stupid logo in the lower right corner.
Kapitananime 5 months ago
LOL at the blimps
Chronolyse 6 months ago
500 tons of 'MURICA!
PintSizedSlasherJr 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
human not very intelligent ...
hexamine2012 7 months ago
Comparing this to a Atom bomb is like comparing a "mighty mite or blacc cat" firecraccer to a 16inch Display shell!! You cannot compare them by any means...
85thereason 8 months ago
I think there's still a major difference in terms of VoD. Military high-explosives only get to around 10,000m/s, while nuclear detonation is in exess of 100,000m/s.
TheCrazyFinn 9 months ago
whats up with the all-seeing-eye on the bottom right? o.O
RazorX53 9 months ago
@RazorX53 Exactly what I was thinking.
RaytownSoClassof2010 7 months ago
25 kill streak.....Tactical Nuke available
Willyj1230 11 months ago
SO sore watching dis shit. When u have da privilage to visit Kahoʻolawe, youʻll feel Kanaloaʻs pain...
SHAME!
SideBangEnt 1 year ago
united states NAVY is the enemy!!!
bembeleee 1 year ago
Lol, the Tsar Bomb has 57,000,000 tons
thekingoffutbol 1 year ago
@thekingoffutbol hEAHEHAEHA NO ! how the fuck could tsar have 57 million tons of explosives? no plane could lift that
Tsar had about 50 megatons AKA the power of. not 57 million tons x)
vkd96 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vkd96
Dude look at this video,
/watch?v=LxD44HO8dNQ&feature=related
thekingoffutbol 9 months ago
sulla casa del grande fratello italiano!!! very very nice....
fax701 1 year ago
So they use the SAME sound for all explosion thruout this clip?
emilen2 1 year ago
where the hell did the blimps go?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
The4199 1 year ago
why the fuck were they even testing this? did they really think a Navy Ship could take on a nuclear explosion?
icelandthabest 1 year ago
@icelandthabest It's best to plan for all contingencies.
Could a fleet limp back home after taking a near miss from a nuclear tipped weapon? Could a sufficiently "hardened" fleet still have any combat capabilities in such an event? Would that completely take them out?
Important questions to answer when planning long term strategy against a nuclear armed opponent.
cl0vvntiem 1 year ago
Its interesting you can see the TNT detonating (black smoke due to not enough oxygen in TNT for complete combustion) but the billowing flame stuff is not detonation maybe there was something else in the charge or maybe it's just an effect you get with such a big mass of TNT ?
bable666 1 year ago
@dko14 'k thanks :)
grugruu 2 years ago
thats small compared to the tsar which was 50 megatons of TNT this is only 500 tons
ADHR26 2 years ago
I know shit about military science, but is it really worth exploding our own ships?...
grugruu 2 years ago
Less than half a kilo ton is not much.
haizahaiza 2 years ago
slow motion sucks
LikeAVideo 2 years ago 4
This is part of a series right? Does anyone know the name?
budel007player 2 years ago
This blast occurred on the island of Kaho'olawe. I've been on the island and there is still a huge hole this blast made. Just to the west of this blast is the nicest beach on the island.
The island area is about 45 square miles. A hole 250 feet in diameter well not effect the water table at all.
Average rainfall is about 9 inches a year, it's a dessert island.
I live 12 miles away my windows would rattle, when the Navy dropped 500 lbs bombs. That was in the 80's .
upcountrywater 2 years ago
this is the best movie the big boss explosion i like this whan the best
MrCatrinus 2 years ago
Showaves mighty enough to rip through STEEL WALLS oh shit.
YBRR88 2 years ago
Im sure this was a while ago, but stuff like this is why I dont worry about my "carbon footprint" or other nonsense. Why recycle a bottle when the military will just blow some shit up and ruin that thought. You can drive your hybrid, but what is the point when some semi truck spews exhaust all over the damn place right next to you.
DarwinJamesEnt 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
everyone makes a difference, believe, have faith and trust the LORD to save us!
TheWhiteOwl23 2 years ago
like the lord does all the time for humanity?
Jyamii 2 years ago
like with adam and eve and that stupid apple tree, he couldnt even manage them let alon 6 billion plus people
lolzoretwo 2 years ago
yes, do this and pollute the world even more...
Come on, we know whats gonna happen to the ships, its gonna be destroyed!
Pemex5555 2 years ago
FUCKS HUMANS.
shopolan 2 years ago
A couple hundred more tons of TNT or whatever was used and I'll rate this 5/5 instead of 4/5. LOL XD
SSEF15 2 years ago
write them a letter and tell them to make more boom boom next time lol
TheWhiteOwl23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is trash...Nobody can explain me that these tests are good for what? To see how a ship damaged? Oh dude!....Your country have to much money or someone in your military was boring...
Peace for the world!!!
dunklermike 2 years ago
Ur an idiot they did this so they could find out how to build battleships that could withstand a nuclear blast fucking idiot
greendaysaint8302 2 years ago
no they want to see how it is when your fat ass make a fart...dont call me a fucking idiot,you son of a bitch!!!
dunklermike 2 years ago
lol dunklermike thinks he is hard calling me a son of a bitch through a computer screen
greendaysaint8302 2 years ago
you make the first step....remember you (Fucking Idiot) and now let it be...
dunklermike 2 years ago
LOL now he wants me to fight me like a little toddler
greendaysaint8302 2 years ago
Do any of you know where this took place?!?
ON HAWAIIAN LAND!!! YOU THINK WE HAWAIIANS ENJOYED SEEING OUR LANDS BEING BOMBED!?
HOW COULD YOU PEOPLE NOT KNOW THIS!
BOMBING OUR LANDS, placing our QUEEN under house arrest, stereotyping us AND ATTEMPTING TO BANISH OUR HERITAGE?
imuahawaii808 2 years ago
I hope you know you are a dumb ass...the first blast was in WHITE SANDS...USA about 4000 mi from your BOMBED home land...AND for your feeble mind, more people died during Pearl Harbar than 9-11...Not 1 preson or building was harmed in these blasts n your home land...Second the other few blasts took place off the coast of the BIKINI ISLANDS...I think the best thing for you would be to smoke some weed and quit hating the world!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
st6a6ng 2 years ago
You think I'm dumb? You think all Hawaiians are dumb? Don't stereotype us... We Hawaiians are smart...
No people were harmed? We lost more of our culture! They blew up historical monuments! They blew up an entire aquifer!
Before things get out of hand here... Send me a message...
Do you know about the illegal overthrow of our Hawaiian Kingdom?
Did you know Hawaii isn't really a state?
If not... Learn about it...
imuahawaii808 2 years ago
did you know you're a fucking idiot.
if not... learn about it.
Pieizg00d 2 years ago
I'm not an idiot. As a matter of fact, I'm highly educated. I have not used a single swear word in my previous comment. Please take your foul language elsewhere.
If you would like to continue this discussion, send me a message.
If you ever come to Hawaii, leave that attitude at home. If not, surely your time here will be cut short.
imuahawaii808 2 years ago
i want 1 lol
bagheadbaby 2 years ago
The tsar bomb detonate at 3lm high and the shockwave went around the world 3 times. I wonder if these ships can stand against such an explosion. Those Russians..
reempe1 2 years ago 2
originaly the tsar bomba was 100 kilatons... can you imagine?!!!
reempe1 2 years ago
it was actually 100 megatons, it was scaled down to 50M by using a lead outer for the test instead of U238 due to the worry of fallout spreading outside ussr territory.
gordongate 2 years ago
its only 0.5 kilatons compare it to 520000kilatons (tsar bomba)
riceicles123 2 years ago 4
Look at that navy ships still floating NAVY HELL YEA the titanic got dropped from and iceberg our ships can float thru this i hate to see what it takes to sink one hope im never around to see it lol
QUICK1DC2 2 years ago
sounds like the voice that lives in my head,and my bum.
superbert35 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fuck the israel nazis ...
Djenbazoff 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
masha'allah....
SymAmineC8H11N 2 years ago
this is 500 tonnes? Imagine a 500 kT nuclear warhead like the kind the Chinese are testing on US Aircraft Carriers in the Dongfeng 21
xyberfunk 2 years ago
The result: look up the video for test Encelade
xyberfunk 2 years ago
idiot..
Asow616 3 years ago 14
They should use this shit in Afganistan on the mountians!! This would sure destroy there cave systems
mattrstudios 3 years ago
Yea first we ship in 500T of explosives undetected to their mountain base and detonate it?
atom2009 2 years ago 2
I'd like you to know there is no intricate cave system in Afghanistan otherwise the US would've corenered and destroyed them. The mountains have passes which are used for fighters to cross in and out of Afghanistan from Pakistan. A few caves double up as small weapons stores but that is the extent of it. The real war is in Pakistan.
PaxBrittanica 2 years ago
why, to kill innocent pashtuns??
SymAmineC8H11N 2 years ago
its annoying how his voice keeps faiding our then back again with a different sentence
11jeopardy11 3 years ago 13
very much agree, must have been a real moron who did that crap to this video.
Nuker1337 2 years ago
sounds like my burbs
mastersingh117 3 years ago
Der Mensch ist die dümmste Spezies auf dieser Welt: Er versucht immer besser sich selbst zu vernichten
Tellerrandschauer 3 years ago 2
--> "Eine Maus würde nie eine Mäusefalle erfinden. Der Mensch hat die Atombombe erfunden" Albert Einstein
HakuGotStoned 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
صفب
xXxman052 3 years ago
I've seen bigger blasts in Detroit.
thegoosebrain 3 years ago
500 tons? That's not even close to a nuclear blast.
zombie900 3 years ago
haha i know they tried to simulate a nuke with 500 tons, even the smallest nukes are 100,000 tons
easyusername4 3 years ago
Incorect
reblives 3 years ago
how so? the bombs we have today make the ones we had then look like firecrackers 100 kt bomb is relatively small compared to the rest of the arsenal
easyusername4 3 years ago
"even the smallest nukes are 100,000 tons" I was refering to that, but your new post sounds much better.
reblives 3 years ago
enlighten us
originalwackowally 3 years ago
/me enlightens youtube
There you go
reblives 3 years ago
you are aware that 100kt = 100,000 tons?
originalwackowally 3 years ago
Yes I do understand that, I was saying he was incorrect when he said "even the smallest nukes are 100,000 tons" are you paying attention?
reblives 3 years ago
yea but then you agreed with him when he said 100kt. i just thought that was kinda funny.
originalwackowally 3 years ago
that's the biggest,ugliest watermark I've ever seen.
andyboy1961 3 years ago
(FROM THE SERVAILENCE BLIMP B): "Bob do you think we are far enough away?" ......
"ARE YOU SERIOUS? NOTHING CAN REACH US OUT HERE. IT WOULD TAKE A..........(GULP).......
"HOW LONG UNTIL THEY DETONATE IT?"
"I DONT KNOW...... OHHHHHH SSSSHHHIIIII......... whhhummpp!!!!( sound of pillow getting shoot with a rocket launcher or a jelly Bismark falling 50 stories)
republic322 3 years ago
If i knew what yall were talking about, id b impressed...
wrbbdrummer89 3 years ago
correction it was only two burgers, one fries, and a large coke
kenjiekenshin06 3 years ago
they stayed afloat? guess we make better boats than we do bombs, lol.
gibsonfanchuck 3 years ago
big
nicktreg 3 years ago
.5 kilotons even the weakest nuclear wepons of the time had a blast of 15 kilotons
ThemostRegectedName 3 years ago
Bear in mind that most of that energy is expended as radiation --- mostly heat.
In terms of their actual explosive power, nuclear weapons are extremely inefficient. That's not to say they aren't powerful or cost-effective, but rather that their firepower figures can be misleading.
BlacktailFA 3 years ago
Indeed. The energy-characteristics of nukes is quite unique.
An the smallest nukes in history was "Little Feller" 1 and 2. About 0.28 kilotonnes. Dunno how they managed that though.
One heck of a neutron-source and U-238 neutron reflectors aimed at a Plutonium implosion-core, probably. A miracle they got critical mass.
anon32016 3 years ago
Correction: It was only 0.022 /0.016 kilotonnes. 22 /16 tonnes that is. Even more amazing.
anon32016 3 years ago
"0.022 /0.016 kilotonnes"?
Sounds like more of a "fizzle" than a critical mass to me!
BlacktailFA 3 years ago
Yeah, i know! Pretty pathetic and a waste of enriched material if you ask me, but hey it was an experiment.
anon32016 3 years ago
only a very small amount of energy is converted to radiation..as for the heat it is released in any kind of explosive material when it is detonated and the actual "explosion" is gas expanding under the presure created by the thermal enerjy(heat)..so nuclear weapons have nearly equal firepower to conventional ones
iamthealien 3 years ago
1:01 the planes
Ravenpulse 3 years ago
Considering that they were unmanned, that was hillarious.
XD
BlacktailFA 3 years ago
my new m-6782034726 firecracker did that
12zxz21 3 years ago
lol this was on the world's most amazing videos on spike tv :)
bcb0xer 3 years ago
the air vacuum. is that what 'squeezes' the flames up and thats why it looks like a mushroom cloud
santaclaus1986 3 years ago
That's a hell of a cherry bomb.
adjuster57 3 years ago
So crazy how everything is pushed foward then sucked right back in.
Borges1091 3 years ago
That's because of the expansion of the air and shockwave.
segregator236 3 years ago
Interesting
Borges1091 3 years ago
After the detonation, a vacuum is created after the air is pushed outwards, and everything is sucked back in.
segregator236 3 years ago
so if there were someway of surviving the bomb the air from the vacuum may crush you anyway?
liam1234123121 3 years ago
What exactly do you mean? Have you ever seen an atomic explosion?
segregator236 3 years ago
if i put it this way, if you anchored something miles into the ground the bomb went off, do you think the vacuum would crush the remains of the things that didn't get blown away or melted?
liam1234123121 3 years ago
Yup, the stuff would get blown away first, then tumbled back. A rough ride, I say.
segregator236 3 years ago
It looses power very fast (because of the half-cubic extension flow). But you should be half-a-mile away.
r8qt7 3 years ago
@liam1234123121 I would be Layin on the ground pissing my pants if that hit my ship
XBxUxTxCxHxExRX 1 year ago
@liam1234123121 The destruction from a nuke comes mainly from the soundwave... people close to the explosion just burn up due to the intense heat butthe size of the explosion is tiny compared to the damage of the nuke itself hence the test to see just how destructive a nuke is... they placed the ships nice and close to the "small" explosion because thats the effect of a nuke from a much larger distance anyway... obviously stronger to the center.
OriginalAtomicSheep 1 year ago
The vid says "to simulate the _blast_ of an atomic bomb". The idea wasnt to test the radiation or heat.
Lecturne 3 years ago 3
Thats a crap comparisome to a nuke even if the ships survived the blast in the center of a nuclular blast the heat it 7 times as much as the sun apserlutly nothing would survive. But after all that no one would survive because the radiation would kill the people in a matter of hours. shows how much amercans care about there soldiers. ooo protect the oil and our nukes fucking twats
jolleyjames13 3 years ago 3
This isnt even comparable to nuclear bombs, The smallest nuclear bombs are 12kt, which is 12,000 tonnes of explosives ; And the largest detonated was ~50MT Which is 50,000,000 Tonnes of TNT
n00bMonkel 3 years ago
since when ? the tsar bomba was 3 megatons, and that is the largest (unclassified) explosion in the world
wormholesurf 3 years ago
Tsara bomb was 50 MT ......
43932 3 years ago 2
Tsar bomba was 50-60 megatons (with tons I mean METRIC tons not the fking pathetic units you americans use!) you ignorant fool! And you think the world would not have noticed if something bigger would go off? Right... The tsar bomba made a shockwave that broke windows 1000 kilometres away from detonation and much more.
Nuker1337 3 years ago
Holy sh*t! 1,000,000 pounds. How much did that cost?
socomsgh 3 years ago
the most dangerous part of a blast like that is when all the air gets sucked back in, then blasted back out again.
btd94 4 years ago
US has 2MT nukes=4000x stronger able to mount 6 of them on a SINGLE fighter plane lol
attilathenoob 4 years ago
What are those fastly changing clouds at 0:28? Is that because of the pressure raises then lowers rapidly and the water condensates then evaporates again?
csengeri 4 years ago
Yeah. It was probably water vapor or super compressed air.
segregator236 4 years ago
Daaaaannngg!! That must have used RDX for that. I make RDX. RDX has a explosion rate of 8600 m/s while TNT does 7300m/s! And RDX costs much much less than TNT and takes a lot less time to make than TNT. And it is much more dangerous that TNT.
jaymepaille 4 years ago
They used nitroglycerin, not RDX. RDX is too dangerous.
segregator236 4 years ago
i take it that was irony...
Pyrodregget 4 years ago
right.
segregator236 4 years ago
Welfare for war profiteers-that's all it is. Out of your pocket, into theirs.
WE
WindEnergy 4 years ago
HAHAH. i reamber watching a video, were they said to duck under your desk and cover ur head. if there was a threat of a nuclear bomb.!! i dont think that would do much.!!
TWEEDSUCKS 4 years ago
Especially if your desk would be vaporized before you could duck under it.
segregator236 4 years ago
SNOWBALL when a 500 ton hemispherical charge was detonated successfully. Operation SAILOR HAT in 1965. Block built charges were now stacked in this geometry. A number of such 500 ton charges were detonated on military test operations, namely PRAIRE FLAT (1968), DIAL PACK (1970), and MIXED COMPANY (1972).
josephdupont 4 years ago
wow!
josephdupont 4 years ago
wowow!
segregator236 4 years ago
maybe that was actually a nuclear explosion.
i mean, how the hell did they get 500T of explosive material together on the water?
bluewhale18 4 years ago
Wasent this the 1 million tonnes of TNT test?
blowjobbftw 4 years ago
Nope.
segregator236 4 years ago
Yes it was i seen it somewhere else and the dude specifically said it was a million tons of TNT, it was just cut out of this vid
Flare78X 4 years ago
The announcer and the historic facts all point to 500 tonnes. There was no 1-million-tonne test. That woulda been too hard.
segregator236 4 years ago
Oh oops i ment 1 million pounds
Flare78X 4 years ago
Yeah probably. That's a BIG difference between 1 million pounds and 1 million tonnes.
segregator236 4 years ago
yeah but it woulda been accurate enuff for a REAL!!!!!! nuclear bomb
riodahoslappa 4 years ago
Google "sailor hat test" for exact information on this blast. 500 tons of TNT was stacked in a hemi-sphere configuration, 17 ft high by 30+ ft wide and detonated, no ANFO was used. Explosives itself cost over $1M and proved unsatisfactory for nuclear simulation because of inconsistency expansion rates between cases of explosive. It produces a multitude of shock effect as compared to a single nuclear event. That is why ANFO is now prefered and is cheaper too.
Barbarian216 4 years ago
Actually high explosives have a much higher brissance than your typical nuclear bomb. A 500 ton nuclear blast at the same distance would cause different forms of damage and contamination, but would not be likely to cause as severe a blast. The radiation flux would have been severe at such a close range.
r0ck3tsm0k3 4 years ago
fantastic video! never seen anything as good as this on youtube, thanks segregator236 for giving us this! spektakulaer
arasaka2020tm 4 years ago
Thanks for the comment!
segregator236 4 years ago
enjoy this video, its millions of dollars of tax money at work. do you feel satisfied with the return?
viciousKev 4 years ago
yeah...im rather happy.
wolfhunter0321 4 years ago
i want to see the craters too...
6mmmmm6 4 years ago
Craters? I guess those cameramen were too scared to go in the craters.
segregator236 4 years ago
those blimps got pwned in the face
Malunat13 4 years ago
they used AN/FO ANFO makes a fire ball and black smoke
bombboy1000 4 years ago
Yup. They did.
segregator236 4 years ago
Whats with the Illuminati symbol on the right?
swampghost 4 years ago
holy cow!!! Love the slow-mo's.
Pyrotech56 4 years ago
I know. Just imagine that amount of explosives detonating in the enemy lands!
segregator236 4 years ago
Wasn't Operation Crossroads - shots Able and Baker - enough for them!!!!!!
flyboy172r 4 years ago
lol
segregator236 4 years ago