The Divine Proportion

[etin183]

PYTHAGORAS DEMONSTRAT° is JUST with [ 3, 4, 5 ] basic' numbers.

Not others, nothing. O.K. ?

ayetin.

[sicedogg]

2:30 is also wrong

[sunnyXsideXcyanide]

if you have a chance you should check out my short vid. yutube.com/watch?v=_w883aiqKHw which is a 3 minute video i made showing how sacred geometry is the backbone to almost all of our historic, present and way ancient religious and everyday symbols.

[xCnalty10x]

i got here from the TrialsHD Easter eggs

[GoldenRatio011235]

hahahaha, Thank you Trance

[TranceTechnoSucks]

0:57 Fail... Pythagora's theorem is a^2 + b^2 = c^2, not (a^2+1) + (b^2+1) = c^2 + 1. Because the left side get two more, the right side would have to be c^2 + 2. You, sir, FAIL at math!

[stelpotte]

These youtube videos will help the viewer:

The Legacy of Pythagoras Part One

The Legacy of Pythagoras Part Two

[wehrmacher]

The author should research Pythagoras. His theorem is side1 squared + side2 squared = hypotenuse squared. Given that relationship, one does NOT reduce to a 'trusted one'. This is one of those things that proves how cautious one should be about believing anything one finds on the internet... including this posting.

[stelpotte]

"Strange times are these in which we live when old and young are taught in falsehoods school. And the one man that dares to tell the truth is called at once a lunatic and fool " (Plato)

[Ultimist]

Hmm, this isn't exactly right, though... the exact golden ratio is 1.618033.... not 1.625... so this is only a close approximation of the golden ratio. The true golden ratio can be calculated by the following way: (1 plus the square root of 5) divided by (2).

[stelpotte]

Any argument that is based on a false premise is irrational. If the rectangle is repeatedly diminished, then sooner or later it will be depleted. If it is not depleted then it it can only mean that the rectangle is an infinite entity, incomprehensible, or, that the degree by which the rectangle is diminished, is zero. Which can only mean that it is not deminished.

[Icabobster]

Why is it irrational to say that the rectangle continues to diminish indefinitely? The ratio will still be there, no matter how tiny or gargantuan the rectangle is.

[stelpotte]

The last rectangle cannot be cut in half again, it is the LAST rectangle.

If it is cut in half again, it cannot be the last rectangle :-)

Zero and infinity negate completeness(existence).

[Yezpahr]

the last rectangle can be cut in half again, just as the last rectangle is a half itself.

Golden ratio applies to this, but your not finishing it's explanation.

[johnfin4]

You really should take this down as it contains far too much misinformation.

[stelpotte]

The Pythagoras theorem has been corrected.

See "The Legacy of Pythagoras" part1&2

[LarsKilde]

@stelpotte Do you even know what a 3 - 4 - 5 triangle is?

[nspa254089]

The Pythagoras Theorem is:

BD^2=BC^2+CD^2

BD^2=(4^2)+(8^2)=16+64=80

BD=8,944271

Come cazzo si fa a sbagliare questi teoremi.

Bocciato tornatene in 3° elementare.

[euminkong84]

4, 8 and 9 doesn't satisfy the Pythagorean theorem. Did you approximate?

[BIZEB]

The last part is wrong.

[michaelmusica]

mmm I think there are not many comments cause most of us don´t understand this video.

[nickharvey7]

Very well made video!!