IF EARTH IS ONLY 6000 YEARS OLD HOW IS IT THAT WE CAN SEE LIGHT COMING FROM STARS MILLIONS OF LIGHT YEARS AWAY WHICH IS MEASURABLE AND DOESNT NEED CARBON DATING
If you take the lyrics to every pink floyd song from the first to the last album and arrange them in 25 x 25 character matrices, leaving out all punctuation, the names of every US president are revealed down the third column, all the british monarchies down the fourth, etc...for every significant event that ever happened. of course prior to 1911, all this info is just part of the implants, but, on a positive note, we continue another 1911 years. the end of the world is not until 3822!
The universe is only a hundred years old. everything that happened before 1911 was just implanted memories into all the humans on earth who came into existence exactly at midnight on new years day 1911. to find out more send your answers to Old Pink at the funny farm.
Here's what I don't get, if there were only two people in the beginning, and there were only 8 people left after the flood... how come we're not morlocks? I mean seriously, that much incest cannot be good for you.
Name calling and character assasination's aren't the most intellectual defense methods. "Call me a Gravitist"? There is a difference between testable (science) laws such as gravity and assumptive {theories} such as evolution. There isn't disagreement about known laws, the divergence comes when hypothesis based on presuppositions from differing worldviews tries to answer an origins question. Which can't be answered by science (testable and repeatable). Evidence is interpreted from worldviews
@hefty798 You dickhead. You know NOTHING about Science. You don't even know what Laws or Theories are. Worse, you think Evolution has a damn thing to do with "Origins"! and what the fuck has ANY of that got to do with "World Views" (You know, Theists have been telling me what my "World View" is for agest and I still have no clue what the hell they're talking about)
Ironically, because of peope like you, Evolution is, in fact, the most tested and confirmed theory in all of science.
@dechha1981Science; systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through {observation} and experimentation. Implicit in the scientific method is the belief that nothing is absolutely proven for all time. Scientists hold that all truly scientific theories are capable of being falsified. Sometimes, scientists are reluctant to accept that a theory has been falsified. Too often, they hold tenaciously to older ideas. Einstein's theories were hotly debated until overwhelming proof
@dechha1981was obtained through astronomical and other observations. World-views; The overall perspective from which one sees and interprets the world. Scientists interpret everything from their presuppositions ( world view) when formulating a (theory) such as evolution. Origin; The point at which something comes into existence or from which it derives or is derived. You see this is a debate about origins that scientists can only guess at which then they are forced to theorize
@dechha1981and guess from their presuppositions (world view). Because scientists have differing world views, you have much disagreement with the different theories. This makes sense due to the fact that man has a finite intellectual capacity, something that all scientists agree with. You seem to put all your faith in man and his intellectual limitations which (no offense) is irrational at best. An intellectually honest person can't rule God out of the equation without empirical evidence.
Only a complete fucktard, or a Creationist (but I repeat myself) would think presumtions have ANYTHING to do with Science. The scientific Method is SPECIFICALLY designed to eliminate such things.
And "Faith"? Don't get me started on "Faith". I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Creatards, and thee. 'Faith" is the oposite of intelect.
How old is the world?....well...we will of course look in the bible....
The bible didn't even bother to mention the dinosaurs, the earth was flat, everything revolved around the earth, was in favor of slavery, tortures people, said there were talking snakes, god in a burning bush, had 500 year old men who walked the entire earth collecting 2 of every species, so many incorrect assertions that it was like an 3rd graders book writing attempt...wow, what a great treatise to explain science.
@frogsquirr3l no, every sngle bible historian christian or not knows that they 2 different geneologies are one from joseph and one from mary. Both his parents (though Joseph is not his physical father) were decendants of David. Furthermore each gospel covers a different aspect of Christs role. Mathew is Kink, Mark is servant, Luke is Man and John is diety. Mathews Gospel is divided into 14's for a reason, Lukes is not for a reason. If you dig a bit it makes it OBVIOUS God designed this not man.
Correction the guy doing the voice over in this video is fucking HILARIOUS...CORRECTION YOU DON'T KNOW LMAO!!!! Ah, creationists....good cheap entertainment LoL
50 years for every generation? I thought this guy was a literal biblical christian, thus believing during Noah's days ppl were 800+ years old... For his average to be even remotely true according to the bible (if yo ubelieve literal bible crap), the later generations should have lasted a couple of days :s. So God gave the babies the capibility of having sex?
@TakesTwoToTango The Bible is not crap, some people interpreting the bible are crap. If you take the population of the Earth, and go back to 6 people getting off the ark and you take the average life span, you get to right about 6 billion people. its pretty basic. Yes its not precise. If evolution were true we would all be standing on piles of bones miles high and over population would have occured 10's of thousands of years ago. Evolution is utter garbage.
You mean science is utter garbage. Evolution deals with the development and change of species. Other sciences have told us that the universe is 13.8b years old, or that the earth is 4b years old ish. You're not dismissing evolution, you're dismissing physics and geology too. Evolution is true because of the evidence for it. Even if the earth is young it's still happening. That's actually what creationists are saying now: evolution happens, it just started after the creation of god's "kinds"
(cont) So evolution isn't the problem here, basically physics is what you have a problem with. But to adress your issues: when people started applying mathematics to biology they saw that species tend to develop exponentially until the environment can't sustain them anymore. It's called limited growth. You for some reason don't believe in it, for some reason you believe in unlimited exponential growth. This means that there are exactly the same amount of specimens of each "kind"
because your Noah guy took 2 of each on the arc. Or maybe you want to incorporate the life cycle of different animals (but I'd suspect you'd neglect that). That however would result in bunnies overrunning the world. They aren't monogamous, they have kids every year. 100 bunnies doubling every year would give you 105 million bunnies after 20 years. YOUcan calculate what that 'd be after 6000 years, so why do you believe that crap?
@TakesTwoToTango TTT, it's even worse than that. The logistics of a man wandering the ENTIRE earth collecting 2 of every species, housing, manure removal, pray/predator problem, food needed, none of the animals died, then the fossil record was rearranged to fool us, then the water just went away, then Noah & his family repopulated the earth by incest...can you say "water-head offspring?" Seriously, isn't this the most outlandish story for a thinking adult to "believe?"
What nonsense, the world is at least 75 million years old. That's when the Galactic Emperor Xenu dropped the frozen aliens around volcanoes and blew them up real good to make mankind crazy. L. Ron Hubbard said so and Tom Cruise agrees. Look it up.
@chrismarshva - Why spend your time being single? When I was alone, and almost certain I'd never find anyone, I kept looking, anyway. Take the opportunities that present themselves because, when they're gone, they're gone. I've taken every opportunity, and I've pissed off more than a few people with my greedy selfishness. But if I don't live for me, then who should I live for? Some fanciful thing that may or may not happen?
@chrismarshva - We only have now, and that's the only thing we can be certain of. Happiness must be found in the here and now, and anything that may improve our happiness must be steadfastly pursued. There are no guarantees of what tomorrow brings, and to spend your time thinking "there's always tomorrow" will lead you to a sad and lonely life wondering where all your opportunities went. I know because I was there.
2. I didn't get blessed in a hurry either. I had to learn what it was like to do without a job with an education, and to be single for two decades and counting.
Being made perfect of character flaws in the next life, seeing your family and friends again, knowing all things, comfort and being with the goodness of God versus the pain of Hell, what is not to like?
Science is enough observation that leads to educated guesses (theories) about patterns of behavior. Then you revise theories based on more observations.
To make a Creationist theory you need to see a Creator creating life, over and over again.
Yeah, I'm a Christian, my gut pulls me in, but I don't call it science. And my philosophy says what you want to see is at least half of belief.
couldn't watch more than 3 minutes with that voice over, i wanted to see that idiot creationist talk instead i heard an idiot creationist talk and an idiot evolutionist voiceover
I respect all religions but if you believe that the world is only 6 thousand years old, you're a complete degenerated brainless idiot, first the data carbon and dinosaurs and worst we know about 8000 years old civilization so please in order to not look like a complete buffoon, shut up !
Hahaha "John Pendleton, Chemist" must be thinking "ooh let me wear a lab coat because it makes me look cool since it'll make me look like a man of authority and absolute knowledge." I'm surprised the plant didn't come alive and eat him.
This is one HUGE insult to anyone who has more intelligence than a gnat. Jesus Christ on a Popsicle stick! How can people make such fools of themselves?
lol they probably think The Flintstones is an elaborate conspiracy to make their beliefs seem ridiculous...but seriously, vegetarian velociraptors in the Garden of Eden? Please.
The creationists can't find a 'biologist' who agrees with them. This fellow is lying. How about Dr. Lee Spetner? How about Dr. Jonathan Sarfati? How about Dr. Duane Gish? Good grief! ICR has listed hundreds of scientists in their orbit alone and many of them are bioligists. The commentator lied.
the funny thing is there are two different genealogies of jesus in different gospels and they have different people and a different number of generations. it was made up to make jesus fulfill the prophecy of the old testament messiah, although in the new testament he is not technically a descendant of david.
@frogsquirr3l no, every sngle bible historian christian or not knows that they 2 different geneologies are one from joseph and one from mary. Both his parents (though Joseph is not his physical father) were decendants of David. Furthermore each gospel covers a different aspect of Christs role. Mathew is Kink, Mark is servant, Luke is Man and John is diety. Mathews Gospel is divided into 14's for a reason, Lukes is not for a reason. If you dig a bit it makes it OBVIOUS God designed this not man.
if a "generation" is decided by the average life-span of the people of the age then why average the generation at 50 years? Wasn't Noah like 700+ years old? if thats the average life-span then generational gaps would be massive!
fossils is their smallest problem... what about the stars? they are way more than 6k light years away so if the universe is 6k years old that light wouldnt have been here yet and we wouldnt be able to see the stars...
Well Mr. or Mrs. Psycnosis (whoever you are) your argument is precisely a blunt proof that all that huge universe was made for by a powerful creator? Is too hard for you to understand that God is so powerful that he did all at once? The fact that we cannot see those stars 6k, 10k or more light-years away doesn't mean that they don't exist. We live in time, we are controlled by time... God has no time! We cannot put down God in a dimension like time, time is for humans.. God is not human!
Im not saying that because we can see starts means god dont exist, Im saying that the fact that we can see stars that are million of light years away disprooves the competly idiotic belief some christians have that the earth is only 6000 years old cos its indicated by a 2000 years old book that was never suposed to be taken literally.
Interesting how whenever the evidence is not in your favour, you just say God found a way to do it. It's like a kind of metaphysical escape rope weaved from the threads of arrogance and desperation.
they say that fossils formed from the flood, which sorted them, and that there aren't very many. that or the dating methods are false, whether on purpose or not depends on the person...
as for the stars, they say the speed of light changed (aka it was a few thousand times faster than it is now), just like god sped up evolution after the flood (for all the different 'kinds' to diverse) he sped up the star light...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I pity this man. Especailly because he is trying to convince people to abandon their faith. How sad. I will pray for him, my fellow Christains we must pray for him and others like him!
It frankly pisses me off that Theists waste their time begging their invisible freind to give me a brain enema so I'll be as stupid as them, when they COULD spend their time DOPING something to HELP people. It frankly only confirms my hypothesis that Religion is Evil.
to someone that doesn't exist, when you could spend that time doing good for people here and now. Take action you will see results, pray and watch nothing happen.
You don't see Atheist's starting wars, forcing our beliefs upon others and killing people who don't believe.
in my classroom there is poster which says 'not all chemists wear labcoats' i think for fun someone should make a poster just for creationists 'wearing a labcoat does NOT make you a scientist' :P
I wonder how many non-scientists actually know what a REAL labcoat looks like. Scientists usually wear a clean one when they're presenting something because having stains all over themselves like they just came out of 10 paintball tournaments looks unprofessional to the public.
For this one, a clean one tells me this guy actually spent no time in the lab.
Putting on a white coat does NOT make you a Scientist. Scientists DON'T wear white coats while giving lectures or doing anything outside of a lab. Putting on a lab coat for a lecture is almost the equivalent of a Vigilante walking into a room and yelling "BIIIIRRRRRDDDDDDD MAN!"
True, but scientists do wear one if, for example, there is a news report about some discovery, and the scientist is presenting information/responding to questions while inside the lab while the news is being filmed, or perhaps if they were invited to talk elsewhere. A white lab coat is the recognizable symbol of a scientist.
I was trying to say that ridiculing somebody isn't an earnest way to get a point across and often defeats the purpose. As for whether or not it's insane or whatever, that's up to the person to decide whether or not it's insane or not.
Ranjirsbrimpzhelusameramiannestesyuliam is one of the names for baby boys that I made up.
It appeared to you as a response to your most recent Questions and Answers video.
Do you want to see some other names? I made up at least 250 of them over the past 14 years - boys' names, girls' names, unisex names, and names for non-heterosexuals.
Next will be a list of names for babies born to unwed parents.
'evolutionist' is not such an incorrect term as 'Darwinist', as you said you call a scientist who is actively involved in physics is called a physicist- may be that is who they are addressing, people actively involved with evolution. 'Darwinist' incorrectly implies that one indiscriminately and dogmatically obey and adhear to whatever Darwin said.
"you'd have to be a first class sucker to believe the second word out of his mouth. " I believe his second word was "once", following the word "hello" which sounds fairly believable . . . he won't be saying hello to me a second time.
That guy is a joke. Is he really a chemist? Wearing a lab coat and saying you are a scientist, a scientist it does not make. My lecturers are University don't always wear lab coats. They certainly don't do it in lectures. I was wearing a lab coat in year one. You wear it for safety. So you don't get anything on your clothes or skin.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! That is exactly how this guy with the funny tie should be treated. ★★★★★
Second thought: it just always blows my mind to look at what appears to be a fairly intelligent (look-wise), middle-aged, mature person who then opens his mouth and spits out a whole bunch of illogical, irrational, retarded & absolutely pathetic "facts"... Amazing.
Looks can be very decieving that way. I used to think that Theists spoke metaphorically when they described Evolution as 'A monkey turning into a man" because I assumed everyone went to high school. But apparantly not.
dechha1981: How can you deny that this man is right. He's wearing a lab coat! Aren't you impressed? That's how they sell stuff on TV. "Buy this brand of pain killer. Take my word for it because I'm wearing a lab coat."
The lab coat is really nauseating. I've got one in my closet. So what? For less than 30 dollars, you can buy the aura of authority too.
Digging around on Google, this guy has a B.S. in chemistry. Apparently he now makes his living by spreading his creationist bull squash through various conferences, videos, etc..
And notice that, while Dawkins actually IS a Scientist, in his documentaries he just dresses normally. I think a real Scientist actually walking around in a lab coat outside of a lab is almost the equivalent of a Vigilante walking around and yelling "BIIIRRRRDDDD MAN!" every time he enters a room.
It's quite ironic that the same people who constantly knock science are quick to use the image of a "scientist" to give authority to their crackpot ideas. Having said that, putting a moron in a white coat doesn't make him a scientist any more than covering a turd with whipped cream makes it a trifle.
Physicist? I saw what you did there. You also nearly said Geologist.
Also you never noted that he said 20 billion years instead of about 14 billion.
I would like to add that only 5% of all Scientists believe in Creation however only 0.15% of the relevent Scientists believe in creation. So that's why a Chemist is discussing Biology and cosmology.
I would like someone to introduce that creationist to radiometric dating and tectonic shifts.
paleontologist or Geologist rather than an archeologist (or the omniscience extravaganza the mythical "evolutionist") =P
sorry just being picky.
just to beat a dead horse but how many fields does one need to study to become an "evolutionist". It's got to be at least a 20 year degree, forget about a doctorate. few live long enough to be professors. I think maybe Richard Dawkins made a pact with the devil to extend his life so he could become an expert in this amazing area.
I think he has a degree in chemistry, but he's actually a christian missionary.
Calling himself a chemist because he has an undergraduate degree in chemistry is like calling George Bush a historian because he got an undergraduate degree in history from Yale.
methusalah lived 700 years dude
EGMAG 1 month ago
Wait a minute. According to this mad alChemist genesis geneology makes all humans Jews. Is that what he says?
EGMAG 1 month ago
Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha
Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha ha Ha ha ha ha
EGMAG 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF EARTH IS ONLY 6000 YEARS OLD HOW IS IT THAT WE CAN SEE LIGHT COMING FROM STARS MILLIONS OF LIGHT YEARS AWAY WHICH IS MEASURABLE AND DOESNT NEED CARBON DATING
pana376 2 months ago
Creationists have an IQ of about 50.
debrainwasher1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:
Have u lied? Have u stolen? Jesus said if you look at a woman with lust you have committed adultery with here in your heart. have u done that?
If God judge’s u by the Ten Commandments will u be innocent or guilty? Heaven or Hell? Does this concern you?
Do u need a Savior from your sins?
Jesus (The Son of God)came, lived a sinless life, died on the cross (for our sins) and rose again on the third day.needgod.com
standingontruth1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
and this is not drug induced babble. I havent smoked any weed for the last five minutes.
domirwin 5 months ago
and this is not drug induced babble. I havent smoked any weed for the last five minutes.
domirwin 5 months ago
If you take the lyrics to every pink floyd song from the first to the last album and arrange them in 25 x 25 character matrices, leaving out all punctuation, the names of every US president are revealed down the third column, all the british monarchies down the fourth, etc...for every significant event that ever happened. of course prior to 1911, all this info is just part of the implants, but, on a positive note, we continue another 1911 years. the end of the world is not until 3822!
domirwin 5 months ago
The universe is only a hundred years old. everything that happened before 1911 was just implanted memories into all the humans on earth who came into existence exactly at midnight on new years day 1911. to find out more send your answers to Old Pink at the funny farm.
domirwin 5 months ago
Theory of evolution. It's still a theory. This goof (the guy who made this video) is pretty funny. He makes a good clown.
Scobo11 6 months ago
@Scobo11 lol you fuckwit, I suppose you think Theory, hypothesis and guess are all the same thing, don't you?
dechha1981 6 months ago
@Scobo11 The theory of Gravity is also Just a theory, so do us all a favor and find the tallest building you can and jump off of it!
deeppurple28 4 months ago
Also, aren't most women menopausal at around age 50? So, wouldn't they be unable to have kids anyway?
Jonstern1983 10 months ago
@Jonstern1983 Oh yeah, that too.
dechha1981 10 months ago
Here's what I don't get, if there were only two people in the beginning, and there were only 8 people left after the flood... how come we're not morlocks? I mean seriously, that much incest cannot be good for you.
Jonstern1983 10 months ago
Dr. Suess should have written the bible, it would be a lot shorter and more entertaining.
Jonstern1983 10 months ago
Name calling and character assasination's aren't the most intellectual defense methods. "Call me a Gravitist"? There is a difference between testable (science) laws such as gravity and assumptive {theories} such as evolution. There isn't disagreement about known laws, the divergence comes when hypothesis based on presuppositions from differing worldviews tries to answer an origins question. Which can't be answered by science (testable and repeatable). Evidence is interpreted from worldviews
hefty798 11 months ago
@hefty798 You dickhead. You know NOTHING about Science. You don't even know what Laws or Theories are. Worse, you think Evolution has a damn thing to do with "Origins"! and what the fuck has ANY of that got to do with "World Views" (You know, Theists have been telling me what my "World View" is for agest and I still have no clue what the hell they're talking about)
Ironically, because of peope like you, Evolution is, in fact, the most tested and confirmed theory in all of science.
dechha1981 11 months ago
@dechha1981Science; systematic knowledge of the physical or material world gained through {observation} and experimentation. Implicit in the scientific method is the belief that nothing is absolutely proven for all time. Scientists hold that all truly scientific theories are capable of being falsified. Sometimes, scientists are reluctant to accept that a theory has been falsified. Too often, they hold tenaciously to older ideas. Einstein's theories were hotly debated until overwhelming proof
hefty798 11 months ago
@dechha1981was obtained through astronomical and other observations. World-views; The overall perspective from which one sees and interprets the world. Scientists interpret everything from their presuppositions ( world view) when formulating a (theory) such as evolution. Origin; The point at which something comes into existence or from which it derives or is derived. You see this is a debate about origins that scientists can only guess at which then they are forced to theorize
hefty798 11 months ago
@dechha1981and guess from their presuppositions (world view). Because scientists have differing world views, you have much disagreement with the different theories. This makes sense due to the fact that man has a finite intellectual capacity, something that all scientists agree with. You seem to put all your faith in man and his intellectual limitations which (no offense) is irrational at best. An intellectually honest person can't rule God out of the equation without empirical evidence.
hefty798 11 months ago
@hefty798 Hypothesis confirmed.
Only a complete fucktard, or a Creationist (but I repeat myself) would think presumtions have ANYTHING to do with Science. The scientific Method is SPECIFICALLY designed to eliminate such things.
And "Faith"? Don't get me started on "Faith". I hate the word, as I hate hell, all Creatards, and thee. 'Faith" is the oposite of intelect.
I should block you for even bringing up the word.
dechha1981 11 months ago
@hefty798 Stop trolling trying to make creationists look stupid.
No one can seriously be as dumb as you are pretending to be...can they?
funkydanieluk 8 months ago
@funkydanieluk Do not underestimate the human capacity for stupidity.
dechha1981 8 months ago
This video = epic win. Thanks for making it. Pendleton suck.
TwistedPoliticians 11 months ago
That joke about jesus coming always put a smile on my face.I watched few times this and every time is those five minutes and nothing =)
WeirdD1986 1 year ago
How old is the world?....well...we will of course look in the bible....
The bible didn't even bother to mention the dinosaurs, the earth was flat, everything revolved around the earth, was in favor of slavery, tortures people, said there were talking snakes, god in a burning bush, had 500 year old men who walked the entire earth collecting 2 of every species, so many incorrect assertions that it was like an 3rd graders book writing attempt...wow, what a great treatise to explain science.
orangemod 1 year ago
Biblical literalism is stupid. Even Bugs Bunny agrees with me.
blackmichael75 1 year ago
Why do they find remains of campfires that are 60000 years old?. Are they retarded?
kellystone84 1 year ago
@frogsquirr3l no, every sngle bible historian christian or not knows that they 2 different geneologies are one from joseph and one from mary. Both his parents (though Joseph is not his physical father) were decendants of David. Furthermore each gospel covers a different aspect of Christs role. Mathew is Kink, Mark is servant, Luke is Man and John is diety. Mathews Gospel is divided into 14's for a reason, Lukes is not for a reason. If you dig a bit it makes it OBVIOUS God designed this not man.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
Correction the guy doing the voice over in this video is fucking HILARIOUS...CORRECTION YOU DON'T KNOW LMAO!!!! Ah, creationists....good cheap entertainment LoL
jayzizz0829 1 year ago
Chemist John Pendleton, not Doctor, or Professor, or any such thing. I think I'll start calling myself an atomic physicist today!
MrLems87 1 year ago
Two time lines.
The Bible and Reality.
VideoAudioDisco09 1 year ago
50 years for every generation? I thought this guy was a literal biblical christian, thus believing during Noah's days ppl were 800+ years old... For his average to be even remotely true according to the bible (if yo ubelieve literal bible crap), the later generations should have lasted a couple of days :s. So God gave the babies the capibility of having sex?
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
@TakesTwoToTango The Bible is not crap, some people interpreting the bible are crap. If you take the population of the Earth, and go back to 6 people getting off the ark and you take the average life span, you get to right about 6 billion people. its pretty basic. Yes its not precise. If evolution were true we would all be standing on piles of bones miles high and over population would have occured 10's of thousands of years ago. Evolution is utter garbage.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
You mean science is utter garbage. Evolution deals with the development and change of species. Other sciences have told us that the universe is 13.8b years old, or that the earth is 4b years old ish. You're not dismissing evolution, you're dismissing physics and geology too. Evolution is true because of the evidence for it. Even if the earth is young it's still happening. That's actually what creationists are saying now: evolution happens, it just started after the creation of god's "kinds"
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
(cont) So evolution isn't the problem here, basically physics is what you have a problem with. But to adress your issues: when people started applying mathematics to biology they saw that species tend to develop exponentially until the environment can't sustain them anymore. It's called limited growth. You for some reason don't believe in it, for some reason you believe in unlimited exponential growth. This means that there are exactly the same amount of specimens of each "kind"
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
because your Noah guy took 2 of each on the arc. Or maybe you want to incorporate the life cycle of different animals (but I'd suspect you'd neglect that). That however would result in bunnies overrunning the world. They aren't monogamous, they have kids every year. 100 bunnies doubling every year would give you 105 million bunnies after 20 years. YOUcan calculate what that 'd be after 6000 years, so why do you believe that crap?
TakesTwoToTango 1 year ago
@TakesTwoToTango TTT, it's even worse than that. The logistics of a man wandering the ENTIRE earth collecting 2 of every species, housing, manure removal, pray/predator problem, food needed, none of the animals died, then the fossil record was rearranged to fool us, then the water just went away, then Noah & his family repopulated the earth by incest...can you say "water-head offspring?" Seriously, isn't this the most outlandish story for a thinking adult to "believe?"
orangemod 1 year ago
the guy in this video is wearing a science suit ......xD
neoarcadezr 1 year ago
What nonsense, the world is at least 75 million years old. That's when the Galactic Emperor Xenu dropped the frozen aliens around volcanoes and blew them up real good to make mankind crazy. L. Ron Hubbard said so and Tom Cruise agrees. Look it up.
stayjit1 1 year ago
God teaches patience, and I don't think He rushes things either.
chrismarshva 1 year ago
@chrismarshva - Why spend your time being single? When I was alone, and almost certain I'd never find anyone, I kept looking, anyway. Take the opportunities that present themselves because, when they're gone, they're gone. I've taken every opportunity, and I've pissed off more than a few people with my greedy selfishness. But if I don't live for me, then who should I live for? Some fanciful thing that may or may not happen?
LeksServices 1 year ago
@chrismarshva - We only have now, and that's the only thing we can be certain of. Happiness must be found in the here and now, and anything that may improve our happiness must be steadfastly pursued. There are no guarantees of what tomorrow brings, and to spend your time thinking "there's always tomorrow" will lead you to a sad and lonely life wondering where all your opportunities went. I know because I was there.
LeksServices 1 year ago
I think God takes His time.
1. Jesus didn't come back in a hurry.
2. I didn't get blessed in a hurry either. I had to learn what it was like to do without a job with an education, and to be single for two decades and counting.
3. And you think God made the universe in a week?
chrismarshva 1 year ago
Being made perfect of character flaws in the next life, seeing your family and friends again, knowing all things, comfort and being with the goodness of God versus the pain of Hell, what is not to like?
chrismarshva 1 year ago
Science is enough observation that leads to educated guesses (theories) about patterns of behavior. Then you revise theories based on more observations.
To make a Creationist theory you need to see a Creator creating life, over and over again.
Yeah, I'm a Christian, my gut pulls me in, but I don't call it science. And my philosophy says what you want to see is at least half of belief.
chrismarshva 1 year ago
couldn't watch more than 3 minutes with that voice over, i wanted to see that idiot creationist talk instead i heard an idiot creationist talk and an idiot evolutionist voiceover
MrCo312 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the guy who is doing the stupid voive over this video is a fucking idiot
psychex 2 years ago
And the guy making this stupid comment in the coment section is a fucking troll.
dechha1981 2 years ago 19
@dechha1981 sorry but i have to agree with psychex
ozzyloki 1 year ago
@dechha1981 I agree with both of you actually.
Alexandurs 1 year ago
i agree
tonyp1945 1 year ago
magnetismist hahaha
TheLostGuitarist 2 years ago
what a dumbass ....
babyslagmuffin 2 years ago
I respect all religions but if you believe that the world is only 6 thousand years old, you're a complete degenerated brainless idiot, first the data carbon and dinosaurs and worst we know about 8000 years old civilization so please in order to not look like a complete buffoon, shut up !
coffee396 2 years ago 2
Sorry dude I gave you 1*, I didnt mean to, I only saw the first few seconds and thought "Argghhhhh creationsit"
Neutrinoghost 2 years ago 2
He want to go somewhere where you can see a geologic time scale. LOL
gregrutz 2 years ago
As soon as I saw his dumb face I knew he was stupid.
Skindoggiedog 2 years ago 2
13billion not 20 billion
Juel92 2 years ago 2
ughhh that tie of his
VoteNixon2008 2 years ago
Every good claim starts with the phrase: "Well... the bible tells us that..."
VoteNixon2008 2 years ago 3
i beleive coffee is real, does that make me a caffinist?
robertwc82 2 years ago 3
i might be wrong but im pretty sure a generation is 20 years =/
FullTimeGunner 2 years ago
Hahaha "John Pendleton, Chemist" must be thinking "ooh let me wear a lab coat because it makes me look cool since it'll make me look like a man of authority and absolute knowledge." I'm surprised the plant didn't come alive and eat him.
tandooriconnection 2 years ago 4
Oh, Chemist John "Penis-tie" Pendleton and his exciting conferences! A classic!!!
MastermindX 2 years ago
This is one HUGE insult to anyone who has more intelligence than a gnat. Jesus Christ on a Popsicle stick! How can people make such fools of themselves?
zideffil 2 years ago 3
THAT VID IS A BIG LOL.Non of the dont lought ore you lose didnt make me lough but that did.HILIRIUS
aprill127 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the narrarator in this video fucking blows.
cant understand his foreign acsent, fucking europians
Xyno1100 3 years ago
You think I'm European?
Eh, fuck you too, you racist bastard.
dechha1981 3 years ago 3
He's Australian
same country as Hitler
DeamonCohln 3 years ago
that's right...hitler was a kangaroo hunter
GregoryPigott 2 years ago
@dechha1981 House quote: "If you have a queen on your money, than you are a Britt for me."
Dziuravy 1 year ago
i think dechha1981 is awesome!
Trevie3 2 years ago
@Xyno1100 "europians" classic, you idiot
123columbo123 1 year ago
@Xyno1100
Maybe you could make an argument rather than make racy statements.
dragonsder 1 year ago
Comment removed
lonerook860 3 years ago
lol they probably think The Flintstones is an elaborate conspiracy to make their beliefs seem ridiculous...but seriously, vegetarian velociraptors in the Garden of Eden? Please.
lonerook860 3 years ago 2
"Of course, we're ganna go to the Bible"
I guess that leaves geology (study of the Earth) out of the question.
ZincFuse 3 years ago
The creationists can't find a 'biologist' who agrees with them. This fellow is lying. How about Dr. Lee Spetner? How about Dr. Jonathan Sarfati? How about Dr. Duane Gish? Good grief! ICR has listed hundreds of scientists in their orbit alone and many of them are bioligists. The commentator lied.
Kirkwhisper 3 years ago
"Good grief! ICR has listed hundreds of scientists in their orbit alone and many of them are bioligists. The commentator lied."
Perhaps, of course their supply of life scientists is limited to about 0.16% of them.
lonerook860 3 years ago
Good lord, I feel dumber after just listening to Mr. Labcoat.
Bfdidc 3 years ago 3
Ah yes, a guy in a white labcoat, "He must be scientist."
Here's a hint. I know several hundred scientists, plenty of chemists among them, the last time any of them wore a white coat was in university.
alcari 3 years ago 5
the funny thing is there are two different genealogies of jesus in different gospels and they have different people and a different number of generations. it was made up to make jesus fulfill the prophecy of the old testament messiah, although in the new testament he is not technically a descendant of david.
frogsquirr3l 3 years ago
Clearly, God did all that because he doesn't want us to believe in him, and who am I to question the will of God? :)
dechha1981 3 years ago
A human being, A real thing.
Kazekage911 2 years ago
@frogsquirr3l no, every sngle bible historian christian or not knows that they 2 different geneologies are one from joseph and one from mary. Both his parents (though Joseph is not his physical father) were decendants of David. Furthermore each gospel covers a different aspect of Christs role. Mathew is Kink, Mark is servant, Luke is Man and John is diety. Mathews Gospel is divided into 14's for a reason, Lukes is not for a reason. If you dig a bit it makes it OBVIOUS God designed this not man.
TheHellbinder 1 year ago
if a "generation" is decided by the average life-span of the people of the age then why average the generation at 50 years? Wasn't Noah like 700+ years old? if thats the average life-span then generational gaps would be massive!
TheMajorD 3 years ago
T-t-t-takedown!!!!!!!
LizbetNene 3 years ago
the earth is 6000 years old??LOL fossils are a hoax then??? fucking dumb ass christians!
airdogg1979 3 years ago 11
fossils is their smallest problem... what about the stars? they are way more than 6k light years away so if the universe is 6k years old that light wouldnt have been here yet and we wouldnt be able to see the stars...
Psycnosis 3 years ago 3
Well Mr. or Mrs. Psycnosis (whoever you are) your argument is precisely a blunt proof that all that huge universe was made for by a powerful creator? Is too hard for you to understand that God is so powerful that he did all at once? The fact that we cannot see those stars 6k, 10k or more light-years away doesn't mean that they don't exist. We live in time, we are controlled by time... God has no time! We cannot put down God in a dimension like time, time is for humans.. God is not human!
alejosoft 3 years ago
Im not saying that because we can see starts means god dont exist, Im saying that the fact that we can see stars that are million of light years away disprooves the competly idiotic belief some christians have that the earth is only 6000 years old cos its indicated by a 2000 years old book that was never suposed to be taken literally.
Psycnosis 3 years ago
Interesting how whenever the evidence is not in your favour, you just say God found a way to do it. It's like a kind of metaphysical escape rope weaved from the threads of arrogance and desperation.
lonerook860 3 years ago
they say that fossils formed from the flood, which sorted them, and that there aren't very many. that or the dating methods are false, whether on purpose or not depends on the person...
as for the stars, they say the speed of light changed (aka it was a few thousand times faster than it is now), just like god sped up evolution after the flood (for all the different 'kinds' to diverse) he sped up the star light...
basically foolishness and denial
JackWisps 3 years ago
@airdogg1979 Your right evolution is a hoax due they are not willfully ignorant that the fossils is evidence of the flood.
mrbjph 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I pity this man. Especailly because he is trying to convince people to abandon their faith. How sad. I will pray for him, my fellow Christains we must pray for him and others like him!
charlesrosevear 3 years ago
It frankly pisses me off that Theists waste their time begging their invisible freind to give me a brain enema so I'll be as stupid as them, when they COULD spend their time DOPING something to HELP people. It frankly only confirms my hypothesis that Religion is Evil.
dechha1981 3 years ago
charlesrosever,
You spend a good portion of your life praying
to someone that doesn't exist, when you could spend that time doing good for people here and now. Take action you will see results, pray and watch nothing happen.
You don't see Atheist's starting wars, forcing our beliefs upon others and killing people who don't believe.
That is the Christian way.
19centuryqueen 3 years ago
Chemist John Moores Pendleton - As he, he works in a chemists, and often helps himself to Barbiturates
syrett76 3 years ago
in my classroom there is poster which says 'not all chemists wear labcoats' i think for fun someone should make a poster just for creationists 'wearing a labcoat does NOT make you a scientist' :P
Erech01 3 years ago
I wonder how many non-scientists actually know what a REAL labcoat looks like. Scientists usually wear a clean one when they're presenting something because having stains all over themselves like they just came out of 10 paintball tournaments looks unprofessional to the public.
For this one, a clean one tells me this guy actually spent no time in the lab.
UNFFwildcard 3 years ago
Putting on a white coat does NOT make you a Scientist. Scientists DON'T wear white coats while giving lectures or doing anything outside of a lab. Putting on a lab coat for a lecture is almost the equivalent of a Vigilante walking into a room and yelling "BIIIIRRRRRDDDDDDD MAN!"
dechha1981 3 years ago
True, but scientists do wear one if, for example, there is a news report about some discovery, and the scientist is presenting information/responding to questions while inside the lab while the news is being filmed, or perhaps if they were invited to talk elsewhere. A white lab coat is the recognizable symbol of a scientist.
UNFFwildcard 3 years ago
A minor point to anyone who can answer:
I'm not an expert in local dialects here, but what is with John Pendleton's pronunciation of the word "occur"?
Gnug215 3 years ago
I know that "chemist." He has a bachelor's in Chemistry from some Mexican University. A BACHELOR'S! Aka, he knows nothing.
eurohim 3 years ago 2
i cant watch anymore. it makes me want to punch people
gingergreek 3 years ago 3
That chemist looks like a porn star wearing a white coat.
Killer0fTheSun 3 years ago 3
This video is so dumb, and I mean the atheist attempting to tear it apart by making fun of people, not the creationist.
TmasterJ 3 years ago
so you think the creationist is smart?
PerishBrave 3 years ago
He said he expected Jesus to arrive in five minuts. That was near the start of a half hour video that was uploased 2 and a bit years ago.
dechha1981 3 years ago
Do you then mean to say that you think the arguments made by the creationist are sound and reasonable?
And do you mean to state that nothing deserves ridicule, no matter how far fetched it is?
Gnug215 3 years ago
I was trying to say that ridiculing somebody isn't an earnest way to get a point across and often defeats the purpose. As for whether or not it's insane or whatever, that's up to the person to decide whether or not it's insane or not.
TmasterJ 3 years ago
umm ridicule in this case was accompanied by PROVING THE ARGUMENTS WRONG. there is no "decision" whether or not this is insane. it just is.
PerishBrave 3 years ago
loved the lord of the rings reference.
LitaniTilSatan666 3 years ago
Did this guy's necktie feature a Bracchiosaurus or a Diplodocus or something?
Ulfbarnen 3 years ago
Good stuff. Is there any proof that this asshole is actually a chemist?
chris3325 3 years ago 2
Ha. This is one of your better ones thusfar. And that is saying something.
TheAmazingAtheist 3 years ago 2
Speaking of unusual names -
Ranjirsbrimpzhelusameramiannestesyuliam is one of the names for baby boys that I made up.
It appeared to you as a response to your most recent Questions and Answers video.
Do you want to see some other names? I made up at least 250 of them over the past 14 years - boys' names, girls' names, unisex names, and names for non-heterosexuals.
Next will be a list of names for babies born to unwed parents.
bearpaw72 3 years ago
That guy is just a christian with a labcoat.
arrogantenoble 3 years ago 2
"What? You're not going to go with Dr. Seuss?" LOL.
We will now turn to Seuss 4:55-And the doctor said, "One fish! Two fish! Red fish! Blue fish!"
Nice to see ya tear another Creationist a new asshole. It gives me a warm fuzzy feeling inside.
bobdrantz 3 years ago
I absolutely love this video to bits!
CapnOrdinary 3 years ago 2
the fact that he's wearing a lab coat is hilarious if you think about it. why does he wear a lab coat on this video?
Finiras 3 years ago 3
'evolutionist' is not such an incorrect term as 'Darwinist', as you said you call a scientist who is actively involved in physics is called a physicist- may be that is who they are addressing, people actively involved with evolution. 'Darwinist' incorrectly implies that one indiscriminately and dogmatically obey and adhear to whatever Darwin said.
idontbelievereligion 3 years ago
great video,Dechna
Dalbert342 3 years ago
LOL - "What!? You're not going to go with Dr. Seuss!?"
CO2Junkie 3 years ago
Who actually takes morons like this seriously in the first place??
you'd have to be a first class sucker to believe the second word out of his mouth.
Scrapheap71 3 years ago 2
"you'd have to be a first class sucker to believe the second word out of his mouth. " I believe his second word was "once", following the word "hello" which sounds fairly believable . . . he won't be saying hello to me a second time.
technologysucks 3 years ago
Why is he wearing his white coat? He's not at f***ing work! Maybe it's to make sure everyone knows he's a chemist.......or a giant condom.
waspstink 3 years ago 4
I LOVE false statements...
Tzedito 3 years ago
No you don't.
h8uall66 3 years ago
I love how he says he is a chemist then goes straight to the bible. What, no chemistry?
Mjhavok 3 years ago
That guy is a joke. Is he really a chemist? Wearing a lab coat and saying you are a scientist, a scientist it does not make. My lecturers are University don't always wear lab coats. They certainly don't do it in lectures. I was wearing a lab coat in year one. You wear it for safety. So you don't get anything on your clothes or skin.
Mjhavok 3 years ago 2
Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha! Does that guy even believe his own BS?
Great work, dechha1981.
Saukko31 3 years ago
My what unusual names! It's a good thing the Bible uses simple words like God, Heaven, Hell, Adam, Eve, Jesus, flood, sin...
YouTubicide 3 years ago
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!! That is exactly how this guy with the funny tie should be treated. ★★★★★
Katalyzt 3 years ago 4
Hahahahahahahahaha...
Nicely done!
~Angel XIII~
anangel13 3 years ago 3
Second thought: it just always blows my mind to look at what appears to be a fairly intelligent (look-wise), middle-aged, mature person who then opens his mouth and spits out a whole bunch of illogical, irrational, retarded & absolutely pathetic "facts"... Amazing.
anangel13 3 years ago 4
Looks can be very decieving that way. I used to think that Theists spoke metaphorically when they described Evolution as 'A monkey turning into a man" because I assumed everyone went to high school. But apparantly not.
dechha1981 3 years ago
dechha1981: How can you deny that this man is right. He's wearing a lab coat! Aren't you impressed? That's how they sell stuff on TV. "Buy this brand of pain killer. Take my word for it because I'm wearing a lab coat."
Largo64 3 years ago 2
Funniest joke deccha has ever made. Best vocal inflection ever. "WHAT?!?! not gonna go with Dr. Seuss?"
Neeboopsh 3 years ago
He has a lab coat. He must be right.
QregTheBlueMonkey 3 years ago 2
The lab coat is really nauseating. I've got one in my closet. So what? For less than 30 dollars, you can buy the aura of authority too.
Digging around on Google, this guy has a B.S. in chemistry. Apparently he now makes his living by spreading his creationist bull squash through various conferences, videos, etc..
pmarie2003 3 years ago
This is all I could find. Keep in mind this is from the internet so it may or may not be accurate.
• Bachelor of Science in Chemistry from the University of Wisconin in Madison, U.S.A.
• Automotive technician for 10 years.
• Worked in cancer research for 1 1/2 years.
Schmoikel 3 years ago
And notice that, while Dawkins actually IS a Scientist, in his documentaries he just dresses normally. I think a real Scientist actually walking around in a lab coat outside of a lab is almost the equivalent of a Vigilante walking around and yelling "BIIIRRRRDDDD MAN!" every time he enters a room.
dechha1981 3 years ago
the age of the earth is from 4.45-4.8 billion years old
547212436 3 years ago
It's quite ironic that the same people who constantly knock science are quick to use the image of a "scientist" to give authority to their crackpot ideas. Having said that, putting a moron in a white coat doesn't make him a scientist any more than covering a turd with whipped cream makes it a trifle.
thatgaybloke 3 years ago 10
Hahahahahahahaha!!!!! I actually laughed out loud!
Largo64 3 years ago 3
actually his big bang major fucking strawman makes more sense then the bible
goldenirish 3 years ago 2
Physicist? I saw what you did there. You also nearly said Geologist.
Also you never noted that he said 20 billion years instead of about 14 billion.
I would like to add that only 5% of all Scientists believe in Creation however only 0.15% of the relevent Scientists believe in creation. So that's why a Chemist is discussing Biology and cosmology.
I would like someone to introduce that creationist to radiometric dating and tectonic shifts.
GREAT VIDEO! 5 STAR!
themanwhoknew 3 years ago 3
paleontologist or Geologist rather than an archeologist (or the omniscience extravaganza the mythical "evolutionist") =P
sorry just being picky.
just to beat a dead horse but how many fields does one need to study to become an "evolutionist". It's got to be at least a 20 year degree, forget about a doctorate. few live long enough to be professors. I think maybe Richard Dawkins made a pact with the devil to extend his life so he could become an expert in this amazing area.
thorungal 3 years ago
Great video d(^_^)b
EineKleineAtheist 3 years ago
The ass-clown in this video is actually an bug-killer from Orkin, and that supposedly qualifies him as a "chemist."
klangsteiner 3 years ago 3
LMAO Where did you hear that?....Are there links? PLEASE TELL ME THERE'S LINKS!
DeadMindWorking 3 years ago 3
Really? He's not even a Chemist, he's an exterminator? Oh I'm gonna look that up and, if true, In am SO making Annotations about that!
dechha1981 3 years ago
I think he has a degree in chemistry, but he's actually a christian missionary.
Calling himself a chemist because he has an undergraduate degree in chemistry is like calling George Bush a historian because he got an undergraduate degree in history from Yale.
middlekk 3 years ago 3
I found this one, angelfireDOTcom/mt/GICC/jppersonalministryinfo.html
and
creacionistasDOTcom
happyjesus123 3 years ago 2
that guy cracks me up, it's like watching a tight rope walker with an inner ear infection
EmperorEva0001 3 years ago 3
"it's like watching a tight rope walker with an inner ear infection"
HAHAHA ROFL HAHAHA
That's the funniest comment I have read in a long time.
I'm saving that one.
TMTGAU 3 years ago 3