Added: 10 months ago
From: 44connected
Views: 2,033
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Anyone who accepts something without investigating it themselves is either lazy or easily brainwashed.

    It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.

    -Aristole

  • Ok so here's the deal. There is rational science and there is fundamentalist science. There is rational philosophy/insight found within religions and spirituality and there is fundamentalist religion. There are rational Atheists and evangelical Atheists. Science can be corruptible just the same as religion. The scientific method is a wonderful tool, but no seems to talk about how scientists and their research are conformed to whoever is funding them. Not to mention establishment biases.

  • This man has zero concept of how archaeology is done. You have to record the specific location of items in the strata of the Earth's crust and document EVERYTHING...you know, like a scientist! His "evidence" is completely hearsay and has no place in actual science. When he executes an archaeological excavation, records his findings and publishes them amongst other archaeologists who worked at the site, then he may earn some credibility. Until then he has none.

  • I don't know or care about the age of the human specie, but this contains two very telling accounts of how Yuppies/scientists/skeptics cover up whatever they don't agree with. The museum that told two lies to avoid sharing info because of who wanted it, then just refused to cooperate when the lies were defeated, especially mirrors my experience of these types; they'll make some attempt to seem professional/adult, but will finally drop pretense and just sneer as if that's an argument. Typical

  • @44connected they used a lot of explosives who knows what they blew up

  • this made me think that maybe the gold rush was so important because it destroyed the evidence of hum existence out side of the main stream controlled views by science

  • @casualtybeats That's not science. Not one bit.

  • lol anyone who reads history knows that the "establishment" has been destroying our past from the beginning.....i remember in college my art history teacher screaming at me that there was no way possible that the egyptians had an influence on greek art..i mean how silly is that but its the official stance of art historians...the world we live in is full of shit lol

  • buy gold or silver folks,because money is not worth anything

  • @44 Where did your reply go? Anyway, you're right, just go look up this quack and READ HIS OWN WORDS and one will realize VERY quickly that he has nothing, credible, to say on the subject of evolution.

    If one simply reads his bio on his website one can tell that his is a WRITER that makes his living WRITING BOOKS. In other words, he seems to have an alternative motive not to mention when he talks about science using terminology like; soul, spiritual, re-incarnation, my skeptical meter goes off.

  • @TheFifthGreatApe Nobody knows everything; not a big fan of his hippie idealisms but the archaeological information that he brings to light does make me question the 'official' history that is being presented to us.

  • @44connected you dam right! this brings in question all we have been told by the owners of this world.

  • @44connected Hey 44 sup. 8) Love your work! If you have never read Prof. Kevin McDonald's book, "A Culture of Critique" you need to do so right away. A certain group of people have always controlled Archeology and Psychology in order to keep their own tribe’s insanity hidden and many of their false theories/history alive. These are the ones who make it their business to, "police the thoughts of the masses". Unfortunately, we have all grown up in a carnival (the circus which is a mask over hell).

  • HEY REECE ITS TOMMY

  • Reminds me of Israel & the mountain of archaeological artifacts it has suppressed & destroyed because they would of cast a different light entirely on their "historical beliefs".

  • @Kinkspace Convenient that there is no evidence to prove those items were destroyed, other than hearsay. None of you people who believe this stuff have a single clue as to how the scientific method works and what can be considered valid evidence. Evidence needs documentation, records and notes in triplicate. It seems like all of his "evidence" has either been "covered up," "destroyed" or is hearsay from some other pseudoscientist....DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMB DUMMMMMMMB.

  • Good job on the video.  Shared.

  • Anecdotal evidence and confirmation bias? Where is the data?

    May I suggest... watch?v=60uJ7sOx_1A

  • @TheFifthGreatApe Charlton Heston? LOL Good 'science' there, huh? That is like watching Expelled w/ Ben Stein = watching makes someone more ignorant.

  • @TheFifthGreatApe If they had the head of the national museum presenting it with no acting skills and unknown to anyone in the common domain would that be common sense ?

  • I would love to see these artefacts, does anyone know what they were?

  • @parrotchops Here's a link to the full TV programme off NBC presented by Charlton Heston, found it very coincidental that he presented it and stared in Planet of the Apes, same story/theory...

    watch?v=6oGqPc6poS4

  • good video ;-)

  • Liked, Shared, etc! TY :-)

  • Me likes

  • I am a world traveler and I can give more tips or advice for traveling.

    Check out my traveling channel and watch my videos

    Thank you :-)

  • well then, "Like" and favorite then i will 12 ft human remains are really covered up. graham hancock reveals hidden atlantis or similar as well. graham is alive as far as i know

  • fascinating video

    thanks

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more