Hey Turkic people! Is Hun / Hunnu your ancestors? where are historical sources of Hunnu is your ancestors? All historical sources are locate in Mongolia. You can watch that monuments if you visit our country.
Attila is Hun Turks. Turks and Hungarians are brother.Look:
Hungarian Jobbik party leader said: Turks are our brother.We are heirs of Attila.
Hungarians formed in 9 different races.These, 4 of them are of Turkish origin.In a word: Hungary and Turkey are a brother.We will establish Turana. Viva Hungary!Viva Turkey! Viva Great TURANİA!
@suleymanmhp Okey, but one question then.. Why did hungarians and turkey have war? If were brothers it whas pretty fucking stupid to spill our own blood..
@petergrr98 That is correct.We have a war.Turks and Hungarians formed the friendship after the this war.There are wars in the history of many countries in Europe.for example= Deutschland vs France or Ottoman Empire vs Russia wars.But these countries are friends now.And I wanna say something. Huns arent Mongol and Turks arent Arab.yeah Turkish people are muslim. its true but Turkey is a not islamic countryTurkey is a secular religion state..Peoples are can live any religion.turks and huns brthr
@suleymanmhp Well okey.. But hunns is the relitive of Mongols.. Maybe not as close as turks, but hunns where from steppies and mongols where from the steppies too..
@petergrr98 You realize that most of Asia is covered in steppe, right? Just because they both came from steppes doesn't mean a thing. And no, Huns really weren't related to Mongols. They were two completely different ethnicities that shared a common ancestor. Being Turkic doesn't mean much, since 3 billion others are Turkic too. Chinese have Turkic origins. Hell, Native Americans were Turkic too if you go back far enough. Altaic peoples.
@petergrr98 Ok, let me spell it out for you. People came out of Africa in three migration waves. The biggest one was the Altaic wave, which spawned the Turks, Chinese, Mongols, Native Americans, Siberians, Kazakhs, etc. Native Americans are just another Asiatic people who migrated into the Americas through a land bridge in the Bearing Straight. Not rocket science. Simple anthropology.
@Cainus44 Nope, then native americans whasent turks. Then native americans are closly related to Turks. You cant say native americans whas turks becouse they whasent. Its like saying every people that came with the swedish is swedish.
@petergrr98 I don't think you quite understand, and I'll put that on language. The descendents of the Altaic peoples are ALL considered Turkic. There's a big difference between people from Turkey (descended from Arabic conquerors) and Turkic or Asiatic people (most of Asia). There's a distinction you need to learn there before you start thinking that the people of Turkey are Turkic.
@petergrr98 Norwegians and Swedes are both Germanic people, specifically Nordic-Germanic, and are effectively the exact same people, with only national differences dividing them. Finns are Uralic, though technically Hungarian Magyars are too so you're not far off the mark, however Hungarians are more mixed.
The people in Turkey are not Turkic. They are a mix of several different people. Kazakhs are Turkic. Mongolians are Turkic. Armenians are Turkic. Turkish are not Turkic.
@petergrr98 Mongolians are not descended from Huns. They are two separate peoples who share a vague common ancestor. Huns came from Kazakhstan. Mongols came from Mongolia. They speak completely different languages and have different genetic markers. They look completely different. Their cultures are completely different. The only thing that makes them related is that their ancestors, more than 30,000 years in the past, were the same.
@petergrr98 It's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of simple fact. If you do not admit that Huns and Mongolians are only related in the absolutely vaguest way, you are simply wrong. Refusal to correct yourself makes you delusional.
@Cainus44 Why would I accept that becouse you say it when scientists say that they are related? Im not really going to trust you only becouse you like to read books, now are im?
@petergrr98 Semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit. You said "scientists say..." but failed to be mention a specific source. The burden of proof is always on the claimant. You, in this case.
@Cainus44 Mongols speak a language of the Altaic language family..Hunns speak a language of the Altaic language family. Boom there I crushed the "They speak completely different languages and have different genetic markers" argument of yours.
@petergrr98 You realize that the majority of Asia speaks languages in the Altaic group, right? Altaic is a fucking 30,000 year old language. It being in the same language group is virtually meaningless and only means they came from the same migratory group out of Africa, as I already stated earlier. You might as well say it's the same language as Korean or Japanese because they're both Altaic languages. Fact is being Altaic is meaningless.
@suleymanmhp Turkey is hardly secular anymore. It's not like the Turkish police cared when a bishop was beheaded by a Muslim in public a few years ago.
@TheEmreboz Iam hungarian and Iam the huns where most likely my ancestors. WHat I have to say is that huns where related to mongols. I dont know if we where related to turks, but I know for sure that were related to mongols. Eather both or only mongols.
@petergrr98 Huns weren't that related to Mongols. The Huns were Turkic. Mongols are technically Turkic too, but much more distant. The Huns came from the area around Kazakhstan.
Saying Turks and Hungarians are brothers is simply ridiculous. The modern Turkic population is mainly descended from Arabs, as the true Turks were raped into submission during the Islamic conquest of the southern Mediterranean.
@Cainus44 Yupp, as saying that the modern egypt peoples ancesters whas the ones who builded the pyramids. That kinda bullshit.. As I now (if Iam wrong tell me why and how) the hebrew people (the israelies aka jews) are the only one in the middleeast that has ancestors living in that land (for a thousends of years ago).. Ofcourse they blended in a little under the couple of thousend years in europe, but they are still decendence of the jewish people. Other people kinda kissapeared..
@InternetXS You are wrong. The Palestinians are the descendants of the ancient Hebrew race. The modern people of Israel immigrated there from Eastern Europe under British mandate following WW2, as most of them were displaced from their homes. They are not remotely related to the ancient Hebrews, whose closest living relatives are the Palestinian Muslims.
@Cainus44 Most jews left the Israeli land when the romans conquered them. So it is not so unbelivible that jews living in other places of the world is relitives to the ancient hebrews. Im both from Hebrews and Hunns. I know their history. Not many jews did stay in Israel, and of those who did, many, many did get killed.
@InternetXS Except they didn't. The Hebrew people never made any mass migration after the Roman invasion. That was proven to be just another biblical falsehood with absolutely not historical evidence to back it up. The Jews in Europe and Israel are converts originating from central Asia. Nothing more. The true Israeli are still there, being horribly oppressed by immigrants in their homeland.
@Cainus44 If so, WHY does jews have genes that enables them to get a sickness when they are babyes? Scientists have found that only jews get the sickdom, and that ancient hebrews had his sickdom too. You can see if you carry the sickdom on you by a more advanced DNA test. All jews that come from hebrews carry the sickdom on them even if they dont whas sick with it. And arabs dont carry the sickdom.
@Cainus44 Im talking about a sickdom only people with jewish genes can get, that has gone trought centuries. The Hebrews had this sickdom too. If palestinians would have been from the Hebrews, they would been able to get the sickdom too, but they cant.
@Cainus44 It is called Tay-Sachs disease. It is pretty rare, but every jewish female that comes from the Hebrews carry these in there Y-cells. Males got two X-cells and one Y-cell while females got two Y-cells and one X-cell.
@InternetXS You realize that Tay-Sachs disease is strictly limited to Ashkenazim. Ashkenazim are the European immigrants to Israel. Unless you can somehow prove the ancient Hebrew race had it too, then you pretty much just killed your own argument.
@Cainus44 And Canavan Disease, Niemann-Pick Disease – Type A, Gaucher Disease, Familial Dysautonomia (FD), Bloom Syndrome, Fanconi anemia – Type C, Mucolipidosis IV (ML IV), Cystic Fibrosis (CF)? Look up them too. Jewish people dont only got the Tay-Sachs disease as their DNA disease.
@InternetXS No, I'm someone who likes to read books. Have you put any thought into this at all? Or are you just going by what a 2000 year old religious text full of falsities says?
Also, when the Romans conquered Israel, the Hebrews stayed. There was no mass migration, there never was. Eventually they all converted to Christianity under Rome, then to Islam during the Arabic Renaissance. They're still there.
@Cainus44 So why does my DNA tests say that I have DNA from the middle east, probably for 2 000 + years ago? AND, why did my ancestors have a Hebrew name and aftername before jews needed to change their aftername?
@InternetXS Without having access to the results of your supposed DNA test, I can't tell you a thing about your personal history. Don't submit personal evidence in a debate, please, unless you're willing to back it up.
@Cainus44 I back it up; Im a Ashkenazi Jew, and my ancestory is the Hebrews.. Now I have 11 other Ashkenazi Jewish friends whos ancestors also is the Hebrews, so how do you going to bakc your story up? The one that " all Ashkenazi Jews dont have ANY connection to the Hebrews"? Btw, what year did that people convert to judaism?
@InternetXS Around the 10th century B.C. The word Ashkenazim comes from Ishkuz, the name of the Scythian Jews they came from. Judaism was a pretty wide-spread religion. You've submitted no evidence of your claims thus far. I don't care what you think you are, I only deal in facts.
@Cainus44 I can list other jewish sicknesses too; Canavan Disease, Niemann-Pick Disease – Type A, Gaucher Disease, Familial Dysautonomia (FD), Bloom Syndrome, Fanconi anemia – Type C, Mucolipidosis IV (ML IV), Cystic Fibrosis (CF).
this is stupid. 1c again everybodys white. ffs its the 21st century stop with the lies and be true.. any1 that thinks atilla wast asian is just lieing to them selfs, its like sayin shaka zulu was hispanic..... keep it real
Hun Huns or the Turks, with the Great Migration of Peoples-known nomadic tribes invaded the Roman Empire, the common name given to the community. Huns; Ogurs, Tungus, Mongols and Turks together with the Iranian tribes, including tribes in many Asiatic communities, ethnic groups has occurred. Under the leadership of Attila the Hun Empire in Europe have set up. Great Hun Empire, the Turkish tribes established, managed, has the shape of the state of Turkish culture. [1] ----WİKİPEDİ----
@45GreatTurk Attila's many children and relatives are known by name and some even by deeds, but soon valid genealogical sources all but dry up and there seems to be no verifiable way to trace Attila's descendants. This has not stopped many genealogists from attempting to reconstruct a valid line of descent for various medieval rulers. One of the most credible claims has been that of the khans of Bulgaria (see Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans)
@45GreatTurk hold your roll their on relating him to the Seljuk Turks -> Ottoman Turks -> Turkey
The literary sources, Priscus and Jordanes, preserve only a few names and three words of the language of the Huns, which have been studied for more than a century and a half. The sources themselves do not give the meaning of any of the names, only of the three words. These words (medos, kamos, strava) do not seem to be Turkic, but probably a satem Indo-European language similar to Slavic and Dacian
@galinrizov atilla was not EuroAsian he was the first king of the first turkish empire Huns hes type is orginal turkish white,blue eyes and brown hair..
DUDE!! attila ur 48th great grandfather?? hahaha. attila ruled the huns from 434ad to 453ad now is 2011 thats 1578yrs ago,do ur math so u r saying all of ur great granparents die in their 20's??????pathetic!!!
Forget the insignificant question of who the Hungarians are. I am a direct descendant of Attila. He was my 48x Great grandfather. Now end this stupidity.
personally i dont give a ratsass about the huns, overall they were just a bunch of muderous canablistic uncivilized savages whom contributed nothing to humanity except killings n enbeded fear in ppl. so fuck the huns n fk yall
@gangstalyrics504 Maybe they were maybe they weren't, Romans called them Savages Greeks called them Great during the Hellenic period we can not trust what other civilizations say about them because it was political, also your a racist Bastard ,and a Communist. Have a nice day :)
OMG!! DO U READ? ANTHING? do ur research on huns history, then u will find out the truth!! just bcause ur hungarian or ur country's name hungary doesnt mean ur a hun! huns used hungary as their main military base when they fought rome thus for there were a large number of huns in hungary at the time! when rome collapse, huns ruled it for some time n then BAM!! they just suddenly retreated n disapperd.n then some idiot name ur country hungary!!funny but its true!
oh forgot, i left out mongoloid ppl r ORIGINAL american native indians(not the ones after the spaniards arrived alot of them were mixed with europens when they arrived. m saying theORIGINAL) n eskimos throughout the world(my god they look just like the asian ppl) the history had showd itself!!!!
n to all ur turkic ppl claiming to b huns or mongoloid hahaha!! the only reason yall claiming to b mongoloid is bcause when genghis n his warriors swept through ur land n then mixed with local women to have yall!! everybody know the real original turkic ppl look much like european many of them have blue or green eyes n red or blonde hair!! so turkic ppl n white ppl stop caliming to huns or mongoloid cause ur not!!! MONGOLOID=YELLOWSKINNED=CHINESE KOREAN MONGOLS JAPANESE VIETNAMESE!!!
you have 100 or turkic tribes from all over the world look at the eskimos they have a look of Asian look at the indians of United states they have olso look of asians they travel around the world just like all turks other word for turks= Turania Tribe iff al Turan peopel come together ill think they will be bigger then china
Or what about this? Nowadays a tribe called "madjar" lives in the northern part of Kazakhstan (Torgaj-gate). They look like mongoloid, however, their closest genetical relations are we, hungarians (magyar). This is a fact. Genetics talks about the ancient times, not about how you look like. These madjars changed a lot during 1 or 2 thousands of years, as we, magyars, did so. But still we are related both culturally, and, if you wish so, genetically.
@MrGyulaToth DUDE!! the reason kazakstan uzbekstan many part of the middle eastern nation nowadys have a huge population in mongoloid ppl with asiatic features is bcause they were conquered by the great CHINGHIS KHAN n his warriors left offsprimgs scattered throught this area by the millions!DUDE!! the history is in ur face!! research it n read it!! n plz quit falsely claiming this n that.u probably do have a lil bloodline but u r not the original real mongoloid!!
Sorry dude, but this question is not about genetics and language. It is about cultural identity. The culture spreaded through the whole eurasian steppe and eastern europe. For example, Edekon (father of Odoaker), the first adviser of Attila was GERMAN. Besides, we know that the leader class of the hungarians in the 10th century and a small part of the nation itself were mongoloid type... but not the whole nation! Nowadays we are very different, but the cultural heritage survuved.
i really do believe the han(chinese) n the hun r related, both r mongoloid with asiatic features n the huns r known to b short in stature but ferocious in battles. they're certainly r not white race!! when they left asia n then conquered roman empire m sure afterward many of them stayed back n mixed in with the local white race. that is y nowaday alot europeans r claiming tob huns. if u do a lil research the huns looked nothing like white but more like asian thats y theyre mongoloid ppl
@gangstalyrics504 Indeed the magyar tribes had mongoloid people in them but not all of them if you know hun is not mongol its a different type of people we are related even to the finnish people in the Finn Ugor group of people i dont know how the hell i can explain this to you:D
@Punisher4bmw u dont have to explain anything, just go n search on the ancient paintings of the huns portraits i mean the original.n then u will see MAJORITY of the portraits shown the huns very much much the same like the asian ppl. like hans(chinese) korean or japanese!! c'mon just open ur eyes n look, huns look nothing like a european!!! ancient descriptions of them as been short n stucky with slanted eyes!!!!
@gangstalyrics504 I am hungarian u wanna see me? im nothing like an asian not even 1 % i look more like a german/ austrian and by the way lots of people were scytan , german , finnish and slavic in the hun tribes i dont know how all of you idiot come up with this mongol and asian shit whatever i dont care anymore if you want proof come here and see me face to face
@Punisher4bmw dude wake up from ur sorrows, original huns r not u!! heres wat i think, on their way to conquest europe m sure they defeated many european enimies,n then the surredered ones just simply been brought to the hun ranks to fight their war against rome empire cause it help the huns to have a better knowledge in geography, cause their not from europe!!!
@gangstalyrics504 Duude im white as the snow tall and have brown hair and eyes and strong muscular type and i feel totaly 100 % hungarian how the fucking hell could the huns be small yellow mongoloid people dont fool yourself come to hungary and look around and go to romania transilvania and look to the hungarian there are also the same i dont know how the fuck can anyone say we are asian or turks idiot ignorant people =_= pff
They were possibly the descendants of the Xiongnu who had been northern neighbours of China three hundred years before and may be the first expansion of Turkic people across Eurasia. The origin and language of the Huns has been the subject of debate for centuries. According to some theories, their leaders at least may have spoken a Turkic language, perhaps closest to the modern Chuvash language. One scholar suggests a relationship to Yeniseian
Hello! I'm a HUNGARIAN, thinking to be the member of the closest known offspring of the huns, and I must agree with the turkish brothers. Attila was ultimately a mongoloid type, as Priscus, the only authentic witness of this nation wrote so.
Besides, I have to ask many people, that if they do NOT have correct informations about Attila, or the huns, or the turkish, or even the middle-asian (nomadic) part of the world, do not write ridiculous and even wrong informations. Thanks.
@MrGyulaToth huns r not aryian!!! they're mongoloid ppl short in stature with asiatic features!!! mongoloid=asian.matter of fact the hun r related to han(chinese). its a fact
who cares his ancient roots? he was hun. but even the name of hun has many clans inside. but huns were leaders of ural altaic ppl of that time. in attilas army there were bulgars, magyars, uigurs, avars, even sarmatians and some caucasian tribes & many more. and ofcourse turks too, simply turks did not use this name for a long time. each clan used its own name. and later russians used these clans very well in asia, by classifying all with different names.
@HBsongwriter He was most likely a fat asian guy...just to inform you. Not to mention the skull deformities the Huns practiced. A short eggheaded mongoloid with dark skin...as opposed to the build white blonde guy. Still love the legend of him...big fan of Attila.
he settled down in Hungary but henkoChizz is right the huns were predominantly Turkic and Mongolian tribes.. later with their conquests in Europe a lot of other tribes joined their campaigns..nevertheless the huns themselves where again predominantly Turkic/Mongolian
He was a conquener,and he was from both of hungarian and turk because huns seperate all over world some of had choosen north and some of huns had choosen south to imigrate and to find new lands then they were influenced by different relogions, but their elder are same.Additionaly mean of hungary in english is land of hun.in light of these hungarians and turks are indirectly smilar nations,also Atilla is the elder of the both of these nations.
"Jordanes, who cites a description given by Priscus. It suggests a person of Asian features.[1] Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin.[2]"
@mehmet4605 are you an idiot turkish = dark tanned black hair brown eyes people , hungarian white tanned blue/ brown / black / green eyed people are you so stupid that you cant see the difference?
Attila Avrupa Hun'un efsanevi lideri.Ne mutlu Türk'üm Diyene!Türklük dna ile olmaz türklük hissedilen bir duygudur ve eğer kendini Türk hissediyorsan Türksündür,Ve biz hiçbir zaman mazluma kılıç sallamadık her zaman mazlumun yanında olduk bunu tüm dünya iyi bilsin.Dini ne olursa olsun her türk kardeşimizdir ve ''Bir gün tüm Türk Devletleri ile Çin Seddinde buluşacağız.(Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK)''
only for est people was Atilla a hero, for the rest of the world( the roman empire firstly) Atilla was something like the evil itself.
When I was child I lisend a lot of stories about Atilla and his people,from my grandfather, and he was a very positive caracter, I quess for people in the west he was wery diferent.
Atilla is what? He is a cunt through and through. Sure he did "great" vs defenseless villages, weak Germanic tribes but he couldn't even defeat what remained of the Western Empire... When he faced Aetius he shat in his pants and had his life spared on a whim, pathetic.
i think your right for example the Hungarian name Arpad is very popular and can be found in the Bible when the text was speaking about tribes to the north of Babylon which is the Caucus region.
The Huns were just a nomadic group of people from the caucus region and a little bit north. Their direct inheritors were the Magyars who are the majority in Hungary. They are white and the only reason people would think he was Asian was he had dark skin and was smaller than the pale-white Romans. Mongolians are probably related to ancestors that split from the caucus region to come east instead of stay put or go west so that is how the Huns and Mongols are related. Don't really see the big deal
Mongolian and Turkish people(HUNS)may be brothers but their races are differant.Turks(HUNS) are in the turanid type of caucasoid race,but mongols are in mongoloid race.Turks appeared by the mixing of finno-ugorics with some amerindians.However Mongols appeared after some another amerindians evaluated into mongoloids. Even if we say turks and mongols are distant relatives, we can claim such a relativity also for turks and russians or turks and scandinavians because of Turks’ finno-ugoric roots.
The word "turk" is a general name of all the people who come from uygurs,kypchaks, kumans, tatars, all oguz(uz) turks and central asian people (except mongols). Turkistan=Turkland is the oldest name of Central asia, caucasia and southern russia One more point, we teach the history of huns to our children in turkey as one of the proudy parts of turkish history.There are a lot of males in turkey whose names are "atilla"
Hungarians were turkish tribes that mixed with uralic tribes.They were totally 10 tribes. 7 tribes were turkish, 3 tribes were uralics. Surprisingly, 7 turkish tribes were effected by those 3 uralic tribes in all ways. By the way, turks come from the mixing of many finno-ugorics and some amerindians in very old past. So turks(in turkey,caucasia,central asia,balkans,moldova, south and east russia) are relatives of not only hungarians but also all finno-ugorics.
Attila was not a barbarian. He was not a viscous killer. He made Europe. At those times, Europe was corrupted by pagans and polytheism. Attila brought the true Christianity to Europe. The real churches were Albanian Turkish churches with an octagonal base and the real cross did not have a long end. It was a perfectly aligned cross. Attila fought the soldiers. He never attacked the innocent people. He was a hero to Europe. Long Live Attila!
leader of turks:
atilla
cengizhan
fatih s.mehmet
sultan süleyman
osman bey
mustafa k.atatürk
metehan ...............
MrHasadam 1 day ago
közünk nincs a finnekhez se a mongolokhoz se a törökökhöz mi ufok vagyunk hungary is ufo
Fodytomi 1 week ago
Hey Turkic people! Is Hun / Hunnu your ancestors? where are historical sources of Hunnu is your ancestors? All historical sources are locate in Mongolia. You can watch that monuments if you visit our country.
baroquemetal 1 week ago
Comment removed
baroquemetal 1 week ago
Comment removed
baroquemetal 1 week ago
Comment removed
baroquemetal 1 week ago
Comment removed
baroquemetal 1 week ago
The Brits couldn't find any migrant Chinese to play some of the huns?.... hahaha... what a joke.
dvsxavier 2 weeks ago
This "fantasy" is not even close to reality. BBC/Discovery people, you ought to learn some real history. Greetings from Hungary.
abacusTMe 2 weeks ago
Huns on foot hhhahhah the huns slept on horse,
HungarianHistory2 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Atiila is Mongolian and his son is Dshingis khaan[Chingiis khaan]
NazaHLN 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
name of the music?????please!
MisterFabulous1991 3 weeks ago
name of the music?????please!
MisterFabulous1991 3 weeks ago
Attila is Hun Turks. Turks and Hungarians are brother.Look:
Hungarian Jobbik party leader said: Turks are our brother.We are heirs of Attila.
Hungarians formed in 9 different races.These, 4 of them are of Turkish origin.In a word: Hungary and Turkey are a brother.We will establish Turana. Viva Hungary!Viva Turkey! Viva Great TURANİA!
suleymanmhp 1 month ago 3
@suleymanmhp Okey, but one question then.. Why did hungarians and turkey have war? If were brothers it whas pretty fucking stupid to spill our own blood..
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 That is correct.We have a war.Turks and Hungarians formed the friendship after the this war.There are wars in the history of many countries in Europe.for example= Deutschland vs France or Ottoman Empire vs Russia wars.But these countries are friends now.And I wanna say something. Huns arent Mongol and Turks arent Arab.yeah Turkish people are muslim. its true but Turkey is a not islamic countryTurkey is a secular religion state..Peoples are can live any religion.turks and huns brthr
suleymanmhp 1 month ago
@suleymanmhp Well okey.. But hunns is the relitive of Mongols.. Maybe not as close as turks, but hunns where from steppies and mongols where from the steppies too..
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 You realize that most of Asia is covered in steppe, right? Just because they both came from steppes doesn't mean a thing. And no, Huns really weren't related to Mongols. They were two completely different ethnicities that shared a common ancestor. Being Turkic doesn't mean much, since 3 billion others are Turkic too. Chinese have Turkic origins. Hell, Native Americans were Turkic too if you go back far enough. Altaic peoples.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 When you go so far you say Americans where Turkic I really stop beliving in you. Hell, why dont we say Turkic is African?
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 Ok, let me spell it out for you. People came out of Africa in three migration waves. The biggest one was the Altaic wave, which spawned the Turks, Chinese, Mongols, Native Americans, Siberians, Kazakhs, etc. Native Americans are just another Asiatic people who migrated into the Americas through a land bridge in the Bearing Straight. Not rocket science. Simple anthropology.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Nope, then native americans whasent turks. Then native americans are closly related to Turks. You cant say native americans whas turks becouse they whasent. Its like saying every people that came with the swedish is swedish.
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 I don't think you quite understand, and I'll put that on language. The descendents of the Altaic peoples are ALL considered Turkic. There's a big difference between people from Turkey (descended from Arabic conquerors) and Turkic or Asiatic people (most of Asia). There's a distinction you need to learn there before you start thinking that the people of Turkey are Turkic.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 So if I follow your logic, Norvegian people are Swedish? And Finns are Hungarian?
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 Norwegians and Swedes are both Germanic people, specifically Nordic-Germanic, and are effectively the exact same people, with only national differences dividing them. Finns are Uralic, though technically Hungarian Magyars are too so you're not far off the mark, however Hungarians are more mixed.
The people in Turkey are not Turkic. They are a mix of several different people. Kazakhs are Turkic. Mongolians are Turkic. Armenians are Turkic. Turkish are not Turkic.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Mongalians = Decendence of Hunns
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 Mongolians are not descended from Huns. They are two separate peoples who share a vague common ancestor. Huns came from Kazakhstan. Mongols came from Mongolia. They speak completely different languages and have different genetic markers. They look completely different. Their cultures are completely different. The only thing that makes them related is that their ancestors, more than 30,000 years in the past, were the same.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 And you know this how?
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 Because I enjoy anthropology and research it? Seriously, this isn't exactly uncommon knowledge.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Well I do too, and I belive Hunns and Mongolians is related.
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 It's not a matter of belief, it's a matter of simple fact. If you do not admit that Huns and Mongolians are only related in the absolutely vaguest way, you are simply wrong. Refusal to correct yourself makes you delusional.
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 Why would I accept that becouse you say it when scientists say that they are related? Im not really going to trust you only becouse you like to read books, now are im?
petergrr98 4 weeks ago
@petergrr98 Scientists don't say that, and I invite you to prove me wrong.
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 No, YOU should prove ME wrong.
petergrr98 4 weeks ago
@petergrr98 Semper necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit. You said "scientists say..." but failed to be mention a specific source. The burden of proof is always on the claimant. You, in this case.
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 Mongols speak a language of the Altaic language family..Hunns speak a language of the Altaic language family. Boom there I crushed the "They speak completely different languages and have different genetic markers" argument of yours.
petergrr98 4 weeks ago
@petergrr98 You realize that the majority of Asia speaks languages in the Altaic group, right? Altaic is a fucking 30,000 year old language. It being in the same language group is virtually meaningless and only means they came from the same migratory group out of Africa, as I already stated earlier. You might as well say it's the same language as Korean or Japanese because they're both Altaic languages. Fact is being Altaic is meaningless.
Cainus44 3 weeks ago
@suleymanmhp Turkey is hardly secular anymore. It's not like the Turkish police cared when a bishop was beheaded by a Muslim in public a few years ago.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@suleymanmhp Daha brezilyanin yerini bilmeyen lideriniz mi yapicak peki?
berke657 3 weeks ago
@berke657 kimden bahsediyon sen ?
suleymanmhp 3 weeks ago
@suleymanmhp devlet bahçeli
berke657 3 weeks ago
@suleymanmhp büyüme ticaretle olur hakimiyette üreterek
berke657 3 weeks ago
@berke657 amk bahçeli,erdogan yada kılıçdaroğlu ne fark eder bunun hun türk kardeşliğiyle ne alakası var ?
suleymanmhp 3 weeks ago
@suleymanmhp turan diyiyorsun büyük birlik bunu kuracak lider yok şu anda
berke657 3 weeks ago
@berke657 haklar anlaşsın elbet birgün kurulur orası kolay
suleymanmhp 2 weeks ago
Nino Belov NIMRUD GREATEST WARIOR EVER!SERB
ultraczds 1 month ago
Huns are pussys
ultraczds 1 month ago
its very interesting to see the history of this great people of turkey. they will be always a might in the world history
Kales50 1 month ago
Hey papalolita you read the history of Hunnu! Hun was right and left Hun. They broke two parts, so left Hunn moved to Europe. They a nomadics
baroquemetal 1 month ago
attila fucks everybody. what a great history. long lives turks and all their friends
Kales50 1 month ago
@n1ghtb3h3m0th
Hun /Hunnu/ = Mongols. Hun is our ancestors. Not china
baroquemetal 1 month ago
@baroquemetal Huns are not Mongols. Related, but not identical.
papalolita 1 month ago 8
@papalolita yes huns rae not mongols , huns are turks
TheEmreboz 1 month ago
@TheEmreboz Iam hungarian and Iam the huns where most likely my ancestors. WHat I have to say is that huns where related to mongols. I dont know if we where related to turks, but I know for sure that were related to mongols. Eather both or only mongols.
petergrr98 1 month ago
@petergrr98 Huns weren't that related to Mongols. The Huns were Turkic. Mongols are technically Turkic too, but much more distant. The Huns came from the area around Kazakhstan.
Saying Turks and Hungarians are brothers is simply ridiculous. The modern Turkic population is mainly descended from Arabs, as the true Turks were raped into submission during the Islamic conquest of the southern Mediterranean.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Yupp, as saying that the modern egypt peoples ancesters whas the ones who builded the pyramids. That kinda bullshit.. As I now (if Iam wrong tell me why and how) the hebrew people (the israelies aka jews) are the only one in the middleeast that has ancestors living in that land (for a thousends of years ago).. Ofcourse they blended in a little under the couple of thousend years in europe, but they are still decendence of the jewish people. Other people kinda kissapeared..
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS You are wrong. The Palestinians are the descendants of the ancient Hebrew race. The modern people of Israel immigrated there from Eastern Europe under British mandate following WW2, as most of them were displaced from their homes. They are not remotely related to the ancient Hebrews, whose closest living relatives are the Palestinian Muslims.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Most jews left the Israeli land when the romans conquered them. So it is not so unbelivible that jews living in other places of the world is relitives to the ancient hebrews. Im both from Hebrews and Hunns. I know their history. Not many jews did stay in Israel, and of those who did, many, many did get killed.
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS Except they didn't. The Hebrew people never made any mass migration after the Roman invasion. That was proven to be just another biblical falsehood with absolutely not historical evidence to back it up. The Jews in Europe and Israel are converts originating from central Asia. Nothing more. The true Israeli are still there, being horribly oppressed by immigrants in their homeland.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 If so, WHY does jews have genes that enables them to get a sickness when they are babyes? Scientists have found that only jews get the sickdom, and that ancient hebrews had his sickdom too. You can see if you carry the sickdom on you by a more advanced DNA test. All jews that come from hebrews carry the sickdom on them even if they dont whas sick with it. And arabs dont carry the sickdom.
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS What are you even talking about?
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 Im talking about a sickdom only people with jewish genes can get, that has gone trought centuries. The Hebrews had this sickdom too. If palestinians would have been from the Hebrews, they would been able to get the sickdom too, but they cant.
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS I've honestly got no idea what you're talking about. Can you be specific and name this ethnic sickness?
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 It is called Tay-Sachs disease. It is pretty rare, but every jewish female that comes from the Hebrews carry these in there Y-cells. Males got two X-cells and one Y-cell while females got two Y-cells and one X-cell.
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS You realize that Tay-Sachs disease is strictly limited to Ashkenazim. Ashkenazim are the European immigrants to Israel. Unless you can somehow prove the ancient Hebrew race had it too, then you pretty much just killed your own argument.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 And Canavan Disease, Niemann-Pick Disease – Type A, Gaucher Disease, Familial Dysautonomia (FD), Bloom Syndrome, Fanconi anemia – Type C, Mucolipidosis IV (ML IV), Cystic Fibrosis (CF)? Look up them too. Jewish people dont only got the Tay-Sachs disease as their DNA disease.
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS All Ashkenazim. Have nothing to do with ancient Hebrews.
Cainus44 1 month ago
@Cainus44 ah, so youre a scientist?
InternetXS 1 month ago
@InternetXS No, I'm someone who likes to read books. Have you put any thought into this at all? Or are you just going by what a 2000 year old religious text full of falsities says?
Also, when the Romans conquered Israel, the Hebrews stayed. There was no mass migration, there never was. Eventually they all converted to Christianity under Rome, then to Islam during the Arabic Renaissance. They're still there.
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 Then explain why im in europe?
InternetXS 4 weeks ago
@InternetXS Because you're the descendent of central Asians, mainly Tartars, who converted to Judaism during the Dark Ages?
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 So why does my DNA tests say that I have DNA from the middle east, probably for 2 000 + years ago? AND, why did my ancestors have a Hebrew name and aftername before jews needed to change their aftername?
InternetXS 4 weeks ago
@InternetXS Without having access to the results of your supposed DNA test, I can't tell you a thing about your personal history. Don't submit personal evidence in a debate, please, unless you're willing to back it up.
Cainus44 4 weeks ago
@Cainus44 I back it up; Im a Ashkenazi Jew, and my ancestory is the Hebrews.. Now I have 11 other Ashkenazi Jewish friends whos ancestors also is the Hebrews, so how do you going to bakc your story up? The one that " all Ashkenazi Jews dont have ANY connection to the Hebrews"? Btw, what year did that people convert to judaism?
InternetXS 4 weeks ago
@InternetXS Around the 10th century B.C. The word Ashkenazim comes from Ishkuz, the name of the Scythian Jews they came from. Judaism was a pretty wide-spread religion. You've submitted no evidence of your claims thus far. I don't care what you think you are, I only deal in facts.
Cainus44 3 weeks ago
@Cainus44 Tell me facts. DNA tests that show Ashkenazim jews dont have anything in common with middle etc
InternetXS 3 weeks ago
@Cainus44 Oh, and how do you know what Hebrews did after their land got concuerred?
InternetXS 1 month ago
@Cainus44 I can list other jewish sicknesses too; Canavan Disease, Niemann-Pick Disease – Type A, Gaucher Disease, Familial Dysautonomia (FD), Bloom Syndrome, Fanconi anemia – Type C, Mucolipidosis IV (ML IV), Cystic Fibrosis (CF).
InternetXS 1 month ago
hun = han chinese?
n1ghtb3h3m0th 1 month ago
@n1ghtb3h3m0th :)
TheYoungosman 1 month ago
this is stupid. 1c again everybodys white. ffs its the 21st century stop with the lies and be true.. any1 that thinks atilla wast asian is just lieing to them selfs, its like sayin shaka zulu was hispanic..... keep it real
superfelix20 1 month ago
@superfelix20 the battle sceans look good tho!
superfelix20 1 month ago
Hun Huns or the Turks, with the Great Migration of Peoples-known nomadic tribes invaded the Roman Empire, the common name given to the community. Huns; Ogurs, Tungus, Mongols and Turks together with the Iranian tribes, including tribes in many Asiatic communities, ethnic groups has occurred. Under the leadership of Attila the Hun Empire in Europe have set up. Great Hun Empire, the Turkish tribes established, managed, has the shape of the state of Turkish culture. [1] ----WİKİPEDİ----
TheEmreboz 2 months ago
I don't think I saw 1 mounted archer in this trailer.
powerman923 2 months ago
the huns were tarters...Atttila was a MONGEL
mykalt29 2 months ago
gangstalyrics504 You're the son of a bitch uncivilized.
ULTimaTeOTTomaNpoweR 2 months ago
I CAME FROM AGE OF EMPIRES 2
raja78667 2 months ago
I'm his descendant! His 49th great grandson to be exact!
NO JOKE!
MultiElvisfan1 2 months ago
hun is turkish -mogol-magyar
supreme atilla !!!!
the name atilla of 3 million turkish
viva atilla
viva cengiz han
viva gokturk chaman
salbelalar 2 months ago
Comment removed
salbelalar 2 months ago
HUN RULED
2323giggity 2 months ago
Hun are nomadic "Asian" people origin from modern day of Mongolia. Turks are branch of Huns (Hun Mongolian word which means Human or Person)
tsasaa12 3 months ago
WTF? why the hell is attilla the hun white?
bakaheibaka 3 months ago
ATTİLA İS TURK ! GREAT HUN EMPİRE AND EUROPA HUN EMPİRE.
45GreatTurk 3 months ago 5
@45GreatTurk Attila's many children and relatives are known by name and some even by deeds, but soon valid genealogical sources all but dry up and there seems to be no verifiable way to trace Attila's descendants. This has not stopped many genealogists from attempting to reconstruct a valid line of descent for various medieval rulers. One of the most credible claims has been that of the khans of Bulgaria (see Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans)
galinrizov 3 weeks ago
@45GreatTurk hold your roll their on relating him to the Seljuk Turks -> Ottoman Turks -> Turkey
The literary sources, Priscus and Jordanes, preserve only a few names and three words of the language of the Huns, which have been studied for more than a century and a half. The sources themselves do not give the meaning of any of the names, only of the three words. These words (medos, kamos, strava) do not seem to be Turkic, but probably a satem Indo-European language similar to Slavic and Dacian
galinrizov 3 weeks ago
@45GreatTurk He was EuroAsian I guess lol who knows
galinrizov 3 weeks ago
@galinrizov atilla was not EuroAsian he was the first king of the first turkish empire Huns hes type is orginal turkish white,blue eyes and brown hair..
berke657 3 weeks ago
@berke657 whatever makes you happy
galinrizov 3 weeks ago
attila is asian.
turningaxe 3 months ago
DUDE!! attila ur 48th great grandfather?? hahaha. attila ruled the huns from 434ad to 453ad now is 2011 thats 1578yrs ago,do ur math so u r saying all of ur great granparents die in their 20's??????pathetic!!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
Forget the insignificant question of who the Hungarians are. I am a direct descendant of Attila. He was my 48x Great grandfather. Now end this stupidity.
progenealogist 3 months ago
personally i dont give a ratsass about the huns, overall they were just a bunch of muderous canablistic uncivilized savages whom contributed nothing to humanity except killings n enbeded fear in ppl. so fuck the huns n fk yall
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
@gangstalyrics504 Maybe they were maybe they weren't, Romans called them Savages Greeks called them Great during the Hellenic period we can not trust what other civilizations say about them because it was political, also your a racist Bastard ,and a Communist. Have a nice day :)
HungarianForGOD 2 months ago
@HungarianForGOD attila is asian not a white boy!!!
gangstalyrics504 2 months ago
@gangstalyrics504 he's not Asian not White he is his own race group
HungarianForGOD 2 months ago
OMG!! DO U READ? ANTHING? do ur research on huns history, then u will find out the truth!! just bcause ur hungarian or ur country's name hungary doesnt mean ur a hun! huns used hungary as their main military base when they fought rome thus for there were a large number of huns in hungary at the time! when rome collapse, huns ruled it for some time n then BAM!! they just suddenly retreated n disapperd.n then some idiot name ur country hungary!!funny but its true!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
dude quit been an asshole!! ur not a hun!!!! history said huns were from ASIA!! y da fk u ppl tryn to sound like they from europe???
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
oh forgot, i left out mongoloid ppl r ORIGINAL american native indians(not the ones after the spaniards arrived alot of them were mixed with europens when they arrived. m saying theORIGINAL) n eskimos throughout the world(my god they look just like the asian ppl) the history had showd itself!!!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
n to all ur turkic ppl claiming to b huns or mongoloid hahaha!! the only reason yall claiming to b mongoloid is bcause when genghis n his warriors swept through ur land n then mixed with local women to have yall!! everybody know the real original turkic ppl look much like european many of them have blue or green eyes n red or blonde hair!! so turkic ppl n white ppl stop caliming to huns or mongoloid cause ur not!!! MONGOLOID=YELLOWSKINNED=CHINESE KOREAN MONGOLS JAPANESE VIETNAMESE!!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
@ddelioglan
moron Turks = Turkic
you have 100 or turkic tribes from all over the world look at the eskimos they have a look of Asian look at the indians of United states they have olso look of asians they travel around the world just like all turks other word for turks= Turania Tribe iff al Turan peopel come together ill think they will be bigger then china
Polofreak6n2 3 months ago
Or what about this? Nowadays a tribe called "madjar" lives in the northern part of Kazakhstan (Torgaj-gate). They look like mongoloid, however, their closest genetical relations are we, hungarians (magyar). This is a fact. Genetics talks about the ancient times, not about how you look like. These madjars changed a lot during 1 or 2 thousands of years, as we, magyars, did so. But still we are related both culturally, and, if you wish so, genetically.
MrGyulaToth 3 months ago
@MrGyulaToth DUDE!! the reason kazakstan uzbekstan many part of the middle eastern nation nowadys have a huge population in mongoloid ppl with asiatic features is bcause they were conquered by the great CHINGHIS KHAN n his warriors left offsprimgs scattered throught this area by the millions!DUDE!! the history is in ur face!! research it n read it!! n plz quit falsely claiming this n that.u probably do have a lil bloodline but u r not the original real mongoloid!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
Sorry dude, but this question is not about genetics and language. It is about cultural identity. The culture spreaded through the whole eurasian steppe and eastern europe. For example, Edekon (father of Odoaker), the first adviser of Attila was GERMAN. Besides, we know that the leader class of the hungarians in the 10th century and a small part of the nation itself were mongoloid type... but not the whole nation! Nowadays we are very different, but the cultural heritage survuved.
MrGyulaToth 3 months ago
i really do believe the han(chinese) n the hun r related, both r mongoloid with asiatic features n the huns r known to b short in stature but ferocious in battles. they're certainly r not white race!! when they left asia n then conquered roman empire m sure afterward many of them stayed back n mixed in with the local white race. that is y nowaday alot europeans r claiming tob huns. if u do a lil research the huns looked nothing like white but more like asian thats y theyre mongoloid ppl
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
@gangstalyrics504 Indeed the magyar tribes had mongoloid people in them but not all of them if you know hun is not mongol its a different type of people we are related even to the finnish people in the Finn Ugor group of people i dont know how the hell i can explain this to you:D
Punisher4bmw 3 months ago
@Punisher4bmw u dont have to explain anything, just go n search on the ancient paintings of the huns portraits i mean the original.n then u will see MAJORITY of the portraits shown the huns very much much the same like the asian ppl. like hans(chinese) korean or japanese!! c'mon just open ur eyes n look, huns look nothing like a european!!! ancient descriptions of them as been short n stucky with slanted eyes!!!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
@gangstalyrics504 I am hungarian u wanna see me? im nothing like an asian not even 1 % i look more like a german/ austrian and by the way lots of people were scytan , german , finnish and slavic in the hun tribes i dont know how all of you idiot come up with this mongol and asian shit whatever i dont care anymore if you want proof come here and see me face to face
Punisher4bmw 3 months ago
@Punisher4bmw dude wake up from ur sorrows, original huns r not u!! heres wat i think, on their way to conquest europe m sure they defeated many european enimies,n then the surredered ones just simply been brought to the hun ranks to fight their war against rome empire cause it help the huns to have a better knowledge in geography, cause their not from europe!!!
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
@gangstalyrics504 Duude im white as the snow tall and have brown hair and eyes and strong muscular type and i feel totaly 100 % hungarian how the fucking hell could the huns be small yellow mongoloid people dont fool yourself come to hungary and look around and go to romania transilvania and look to the hungarian there are also the same i dont know how the fuck can anyone say we are asian or turks idiot ignorant people =_= pff
Punisher4bmw 3 months ago
Huns and their ( Background ) -
They were possibly the descendants of the Xiongnu who had been northern neighbours of China three hundred years before and may be the first expansion of Turkic people across Eurasia. The origin and language of the Huns has been the subject of debate for centuries. According to some theories, their leaders at least may have spoken a Turkic language, perhaps closest to the modern Chuvash language. One scholar suggests a relationship to Yeniseian
LongLiveTurkicPeople 4 months ago
THE HUNS ARE GERMANS
unfukkkmee 4 months ago
Hello! I'm a HUNGARIAN, thinking to be the member of the closest known offspring of the huns, and I must agree with the turkish brothers. Attila was ultimately a mongoloid type, as Priscus, the only authentic witness of this nation wrote so.
Besides, I have to ask many people, that if they do NOT have correct informations about Attila, or the huns, or the turkish, or even the middle-asian (nomadic) part of the world, do not write ridiculous and even wrong informations. Thanks.
MrGyulaToth 4 months ago
@MrGyulaToth huns r not aryian!!! they're mongoloid ppl short in stature with asiatic features!!! mongoloid=asian.matter of fact the hun r related to han(chinese). its a fact
gangstalyrics504 3 months ago
attila is a mongoloid .the turk was an mongoloid tribe too.today's turkey people were their slaves.
xmanoo 4 months ago
who cares his ancient roots? he was hun. but even the name of hun has many clans inside. but huns were leaders of ural altaic ppl of that time. in attilas army there were bulgars, magyars, uigurs, avars, even sarmatians and some caucasian tribes & many more. and ofcourse turks too, simply turks did not use this name for a long time. each clan used its own name. and later russians used these clans very well in asia, by classifying all with different names.
we are all from lost continent of MU :)
karteorhan 4 months ago
I am sort of happy about his portrayal. But certainly 100% happy he is not a fat asian guy like in Night at the Museum.
HBsongwriter 5 months ago
@HBsongwriter He was most likely a fat asian guy...just to inform you. Not to mention the skull deformities the Huns practiced. A short eggheaded mongoloid with dark skin...as opposed to the build white blonde guy. Still love the legend of him...big fan of Attila.
factumDiabolus 5 months ago
he settled down in Hungary but henkoChizz is right the huns were predominantly Turkic and Mongolian tribes.. later with their conquests in Europe a lot of other tribes joined their campaigns..nevertheless the huns themselves where again predominantly Turkic/Mongolian
juanchissi 5 months ago
après son passage l'herbe ne repoussait pas...dommage qu'il soit mort, je l'aurais engagé comme jardinier!!
derisionman 5 months ago
He was a conquener,and he was from both of hungarian and turk because huns seperate all over world some of had choosen north and some of huns had choosen south to imigrate and to find new lands then they were influenced by different relogions, but their elder are same.Additionaly mean of hungary in english is land of hun.in light of these hungarians and turks are indirectly smilar nations,also Atilla is the elder of the both of these nations.
1453turan 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheCutep0ison 6 months ago
Atilla the hun was Asian.
"Jordanes, who cites a description given by Priscus. It suggests a person of Asian features.[1] Short of stature, with a broad chest and a large head; his eyes were small, his beard thin and sprinkled with grey; and he had a flat nose and tanned skin, showing evidence of his origin.[2]"
Lordofthenipplerings 6 months ago
Atilla legend! dont say bad words from Hungary! thanks from Magyar!!!
alenmaxi777 6 months ago
Atilla is Turkish not hungarias and hun empire is Turkish
mehmet4605 6 months ago
@mehmet4605 =))=))=))Attila HUN is HUNGARIAN
ttarsza 6 months ago
@ttarsza yes hungarian = Turkish hehehe
mehmet4605 6 months ago
@mehmet4605 are you an idiot turkish = dark tanned black hair brown eyes people , hungarian white tanned blue/ brown / black / green eyed people are you so stupid that you cant see the difference?
Punisher4bmw 3 months ago
@Punisher4bmw bullshit
rapid37 3 months ago
@ttarsza turkic and nomadic. not turkish, but turkic.
aporia82 6 months ago
@ttarsza Fuck you, maybe he was a long time in hungary, but the huns are from ASIA and are TURKIC!
henkoChilzz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mehmet4605 =))=)) Attila HUN is HUNGARIAN
ttarsza 6 months ago
@mehmet4605 LOL you are crazy or idiot..
DicKK90 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Attila Avrupa Hun'un efsanevi lideri.Ne mutlu Türk'üm Diyene!Türklük dna ile olmaz türklük hissedilen bir duygudur ve eğer kendini Türk hissediyorsan Türksündür,Ve biz hiçbir zaman mazluma kılıç sallamadık her zaman mazlumun yanında olduk bunu tüm dünya iyi bilsin.Dini ne olursa olsun her türk kardeşimizdir ve ''Bir gün tüm Türk Devletleri ile Çin Seddinde buluşacağız.(Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK)''
Erdenay36 7 months ago
Comment removed
Erdenay36 7 months ago
JAST 4 YEARS AL EUROPE
baatarist 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
....SORRY AL, THIS IS MY STORY...... THE MONGOL CONQUER EUROPE 1240-1244........
baatarist 7 months ago
It's funny how nowadays people see Attila the hun as something great, as a hero.
But when it comes to Adolf Hitler everyone wear the angry face.
They don't realize they both have the same idea of killing the people they don't like and take over the world.
alkabash66 7 months ago
@alkabash66
only for est people was Atilla a hero, for the rest of the world( the roman empire firstly) Atilla was something like the evil itself.
When I was child I lisend a lot of stories about Atilla and his people,from my grandfather, and he was a very positive caracter, I quess for people in the west he was wery diferent.
jocitrasosmontes 7 months ago
@jocitrasosmontes
Atilla is what? He is a cunt through and through. Sure he did "great" vs defenseless villages, weak Germanic tribes but he couldn't even defeat what remained of the Western Empire... When he faced Aetius he shat in his pants and had his life spared on a whim, pathetic.
123duffbeerrules 7 months ago
@alkabash66 but atilla didnt use camps to exterminate a race...
BERNTRR 7 months ago
@BERNTRR
No, he only burned Villages down and killed children and raped womens and killed them.
So what you mean If someone use camps to exterminate a race is the most cruel thing to do, all other cruel actions are kinda ok.
alkabash66 7 months ago
@alkabash66 no...
BERNTRR 7 months ago
So, who exactly were those romans fighting? Coulnd't have been the huns, for they fought on the backs of their horses.
Rykanable 7 months ago
Cool. When will this movie be on DVD?
AlternityGM 7 months ago
turks -mongol - hun =brachycéphale even physical Hun it is just another empire it is just the difference And atilla is a Turkish first name
musicmuzik51 7 months ago
@musicmuzik51 Atilla is also hungarian first name, becouse in the hun empire there was all the nomad world,
huns, turks, avars,mongols, kuns, alans, hungarians, mongols, baskirs, sabirs, sarmatas, ezekils and a lot oof other people,
turk-macar dostluk!
jocitrasosmontes 7 months ago
@321illusion
i think your right for example the Hungarian name Arpad is very popular and can be found in the Bible when the text was speaking about tribes to the north of Babylon which is the Caucus region.
WOWZERS805 7 months ago
The Huns were just a nomadic group of people from the caucus region and a little bit north. Their direct inheritors were the Magyars who are the majority in Hungary. They are white and the only reason people would think he was Asian was he had dark skin and was smaller than the pale-white Romans. Mongolians are probably related to ancestors that split from the caucus region to come east instead of stay put or go west so that is how the Huns and Mongols are related. Don't really see the big deal
WOWZERS805 7 months ago
Mongolian and Turkish people(HUNS)may be brothers but their races are differant.Turks(HUNS) are in the turanid type of caucasoid race,but mongols are in mongoloid race.Turks appeared by the mixing of finno-ugorics with some amerindians.However Mongols appeared after some another amerindians evaluated into mongoloids. Even if we say turks and mongols are distant relatives, we can claim such a relativity also for turks and russians or turks and scandinavians because of Turks’ finno-ugoric roots.
nurettinsarul 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The word "turk" is a general name of all the people who come from uygurs,kypchaks, kumans, tatars, all oguz(uz) turks and central asian people (except mongols). Turkistan=Turkland is the oldest name of Central asia, caucasia and southern russia One more point, we teach the history of huns to our children in turkey as one of the proudy parts of turkish history.There are a lot of males in turkey whose names are "atilla"
nurettinsarul 7 months ago
Hungarians were turkish tribes that mixed with uralic tribes.They were totally 10 tribes. 7 tribes were turkish, 3 tribes were uralics. Surprisingly, 7 turkish tribes were effected by those 3 uralic tribes in all ways. By the way, turks come from the mixing of many finno-ugorics and some amerindians in very old past. So turks(in turkey,caucasia,central asia,balkans,moldova, south and east russia) are relatives of not only hungarians but also all finno-ugorics.
nurettinsarul 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
atilla the HUN had slanted eyes. RACIST HOLLYWOOD
nonconservative 7 months ago
l am turkish
In the meantime, I am proud of my ancestors. Raiding my ancestors. Victories are won by our ancestors thought goose bumps.
Greetings from Turkey ..
ForLucky16 8 months ago
Comment removed
ForLucky16 8 months ago
Comment removed
ForLucky16 8 months ago
Comment removed
ForLucky16 8 months ago
Attila was not a barbarian. He was not a viscous killer. He made Europe. At those times, Europe was corrupted by pagans and polytheism. Attila brought the true Christianity to Europe. The real churches were Albanian Turkish churches with an octagonal base and the real cross did not have a long end. It was a perfectly aligned cross. Attila fought the soldiers. He never attacked the innocent people. He was a hero to Europe. Long Live Attila!
AzvidMedia 8 months ago
HUNGARY !!!!!
ChrisTheHun19 8 months ago