What the hell do you mean by "they could have done far better but they didn't" DASBIGUN? In this particular movie, the director was portraying Godzilla as a REALISTIC, BELIEVABLE animal. The original Japanese Godzilla, no matter how he looked or moved, was NOT portrayed as a realistic, believable creature. In the 1998 Godzilla, he was created in a way in which you believed him to be a real animal with real world weaknesses n' such. Trust me, you are beyond words wrong.
@spinosaurus46 What IS Godzilla? A mutated DINOSAUR. And what exactly is he referred to? Oh, that's right, a DRAGON. It makes sense if you connect the dots.
Where's the rest of this I really honest to god want to see it cus I love this movie and have seen all the behind the scenes photos of this stuff and would love to see all of this and there's another idk if you've seen it but it has the anchor character visiting toho in Japan.
@MrSamas35 sweet ur the first person that has said that to be honest the should of never called the movie godzilla they should of called the creature something else
thats correct sir.It would have been better if it was named a different creature.If it was,the monster wouldnt be so bad.Really its roland emmerich who we need to blame,not the monster,who did not ressemble Godzilla.
f u patrick what ever your last name is. why change something that's already perfect. Long Live Old Godzilla the only king of the monsters. I guess that why it isn't called Godzilla king of the Monsters
@supercoolgodzilatoys OK well for starters it wasn't totally his fault, the director told him Godzilla leaner to run through the city and had to be able to blend into the backround. HE didn't have much of a say in godzilla would dying or not or even breath fire, the director didn't even want to give GODZILLA a fireball at first but some fan found out and demanded it be given. I believe the design is fine given that he had to go off of very little detail of what they wanted, so blame the director
災厄
111nagai 4 days ago
What the hell do you mean by "they could have done far better but they didn't" DASBIGUN? In this particular movie, the director was portraying Godzilla as a REALISTIC, BELIEVABLE animal. The original Japanese Godzilla, no matter how he looked or moved, was NOT portrayed as a realistic, believable creature. In the 1998 Godzilla, he was created in a way in which you believed him to be a real animal with real world weaknesses n' such. Trust me, you are beyond words wrong.
velociraptor4you 1 month ago
STOP HATING THE 1998 GODZILLA YOU MORONS!!! LEAVE THE '98 GODZILLA ALONE!!!
velociraptor4you 2 months ago
@velociraptor4you no.....just no.
they could have done FAR better and didn't....so no.
DASBIGUN 1 month ago
i know im just saying random stuff
spinosaurus46 2 months ago
BOO!!!
IIPeePee 3 months ago
Mega Movie Magic.
I miss that show.
Bring it back on the air!
MattBL 3 months ago
THE AMERICAN GODZILLA SUCKS BALLS OF STEEL AND I HOPE THEY DON'T FAIL THE NEW ONE AND IF THEY DO I'M GOING TO SELF-DESTRUCT THE PRODUCERS.
doom7ish 3 months ago
@doom7ish u mad bro?
worldtradecenter1000 3 months ago
the normal godzilla is a mix of a dragon, stegosaurus and a t-rex head
spinosaurus46 3 months ago
that godzilla looks like a mix of a dragon and a T-REX
spinosaurus46 3 months ago
@spinosaurus46 What IS Godzilla? A mutated DINOSAUR. And what exactly is he referred to? Oh, that's right, a DRAGON. It makes sense if you connect the dots.
3DOBot 2 months ago
Where's the rest of this I really honest to god want to see it cus I love this movie and have seen all the behind the scenes photos of this stuff and would love to see all of this and there's another idk if you've seen it but it has the anchor character visiting toho in Japan.
gogeta492 4 months ago
the creater of the new godzilla sucks hes stupid and dumd
Tedthexboxnerd 4 months ago
Patrick totopalis is a dick!
MrSamas35 5 months ago
@MrSamas35 wow y u say dat for
MrDemonhunter12 5 months ago
@MrDemonhunter12
He failed to remake Godzilla.
MrSamas35 5 months ago
@MrSamas35 well toho had a part in making the movie so if they didnt like zilla look they could of had it changed
MrDemonhunter12 5 months ago
@MrDemonhunter12
thats true.They said"take it or leave it."
I would have said leave it though.But thats just me.
But to be fair,the special effects and CGI were good.
MrSamas35 5 months ago
@MrSamas35 sweet ur the first person that has said that to be honest the should of never called the movie godzilla they should of called the creature something else
MrDemonhunter12 5 months ago
@MrDemonhunter12
thats correct sir.It would have been better if it was named a different creature.If it was,the monster wouldnt be so bad.Really its roland emmerich who we need to blame,not the monster,who did not ressemble Godzilla.
MrSamas35 5 months ago
That narrator sounds like a pedophile. And how dare you call that Godzilla?
AK107DX 5 months ago
放射能どころか火も吐けないあれはただの鼻息で引火しただけ
hayashi1121 5 months ago
Did they play the same footage 3 times in a row?
TomTyProd11 5 months ago
ゴジラじゃあないねww 火を吐く恐竜って感じ
しかも泣き声全然ちがうしカッコ悪い
hayasiraisu100 5 months ago
f u patrick what ever your last name is. why change something that's already perfect. Long Live Old Godzilla the only king of the monsters. I guess that why it isn't called Godzilla king of the Monsters
supercoolgodzilatoys 7 months ago
@supercoolgodzilatoys OK well for starters it wasn't totally his fault, the director told him Godzilla leaner to run through the city and had to be able to blend into the backround. HE didn't have much of a say in godzilla would dying or not or even breath fire, the director didn't even want to give GODZILLA a fireball at first but some fan found out and demanded it be given. I believe the design is fine given that he had to go off of very little detail of what they wanted, so blame the director
zillamaster2000 7 months ago