Added: 4 years ago
From: e2e4checkmate
Views: 628,536
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (487)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • minecraft has better graphics than this

  • кастрюля...

  • Ржавое говно

    

  • Eisenhart.....................­......

    

  • Ich wäre gerne Truchſeſs zur See :-)

  • lol... filmed with a potatoe

  • The only thing i see is 2 big pixels changing their position every 2 seconds.

  • This is top secret video, and that is why the poor quality ;)

  • Гтовьсь!

  • Su-25 Frogfoot

  • @80AFT More likely the Su25T or "Su39" as the marketing says.

  • Für die, die nicht verstanden haben -beim ersten versuch hat su 23 sich eine schassi abgebrochen beim zweitem sind Helden gut gelandet ...danach feuer übung und reparierung oder in standsetzung räumen die nach dem feuer beschädigt würde ,danach muss jeder matrose mindestens ein Brief an verwandte schreiben um die Beschwerden vorzubeugen das keine zeit dafür ist...Die Briefen sind sehr eindruksvoll weil das beste wird von Nachbarn abgeschrieben...

  • Decrepit, primitive, deathtrap. 

  • Strong lateral wind

  • Damn, the quality of this video resembles russia, really it does!!

  • @zlopy Does it? Well I've seen my share of other countries' pilots crash-landing. :)

  • @zlopy

    Really? Russians invented the helicopter. They also engineered the first LOX rockets. Russians have built and flown over 20 space stations, while the US has barely managed 2. Oh and let's not forget, they put in a man in space before anyone else too. Oh, not to mention, carried out the first ever spacewalk too. CIA in their haste to destabilize Russia, funded the people we now called terrorists.

  • Thats the Admirals plane,stop laughing.

  • lol blueray from russia

  • Very scary!

  • in soviet russia quality complains about you !

  • russians can fly!

  • конец света

  • then squint while looking you cocks

  • @jujitsuman68 Did you work that one out from watching yourself on crime channel?

  • @MrCriticOfAll what the fuck you on about convict.??? lol

    

  • @jujitsuman68  :~0 Your the one who sugested squinting at the image lol i only do that when i try to see whos going to court for something they did.

  • @MrCriticOfAll yea because of the pixels you thick cunt, your going on about court and the crime channel. why are you a SEX CASE or something.??? :)

  • And eating russias finest pickeled baby tomatoes!

  • Russian HD ?

  • @antonyarnanova HD in 3D

  • @antonyarnanova Lol, it's Russian BlueRay)) Hello from Russia.))

  • The video has better camo than the aircraft. Digi-camo is in!

  • i'm impressed by the astronomic number of pixels this video has.

    very close to the number of planets of our solar system

  • @frizstyler LMFAO, now thats funny!! I laughed out loud when I read your comment!

  • @frizstyler I can't say there are only 9 pixels...

  • @frizstyler back in 2007 all youtube vids looked like this one

  • @Fra42below ur wrong.see other early videos.this one is just recorded with very low-end devices

  • this is how they do it, it was done like this..we can all see how it happened because of kamera teknology.

  • you retarded, this was NOT a poor quality recording, the original video is still good quality, we can clearly see it's a video document, is the quality of conversion to digital to be insanely low... get a brainstorm dude

  • That guy at the end is cheating on the advancement exam! lol

  • @Mentalplix nope, they are all forced to write a letter home once a week. That was not an exam...

  • This was filmed with a potato!

  • Russia has 2 carriers: Kuznetzov and Ivanov (Ivanov is in mothballs) but neither has a support group, morale is very low, and if they saw an American Carrier Group (say the Reagan) stroll into Murmansk, the only thing they could do would be surrender.

    The above antique is modeled after the WWII American Ticonderoga-class attack carriers. We replaced that scrap iron at the end of Korea..........

  • @WatsonMike1234 базар не о чём, будет война там посмотрим, кто и как будет сдаваться.

  • @AlexWel1 Не стоит спорить с ними. Они не видят дальше своего носа и никогда не поймет. Они дерьмо, которое работает на батареях. И когда батареи разрядились ......

    Привет из Сербии

  • НЕСКОЛЬКО ЛЕТ НАЗАД??? сгорели кубрики и досих пор их ешё ремонтируют??? Это что to долбонутый коментатор напутал!!..Как это ремонтировать кубрики ....несколько лет???

    А мож правда!!?? :)

  • No matter if its a Russian a US a French or what ever - You have to Salute the fighter pilots that are able to land a jet on a ship - It takes Cojones Of pure steel

  • @6308281 Amen, brother.

  • russians are worthless shit

    can't do anything except overdosing themselves with vodka.

  • @aliciacundall урод иди повесься

  • The pilot probably just got overdosed with vodka, which is part of daily routine for Russian male adult.

  • @aliciacundall

    asshole, learn russian for dont look like shit. this was a practice. landing with touching then take off. stupid yank!

  • they used the camera from the infamous и-пхоне

  • this video was recorded with a barcode scanner.

  • @LunaticQuutamo or a calculator.

  • @LunaticQuutamo

    i think it was a banana, or muffin

  • @LunaticQuutamo In Soviet Russia, quality is always bad.

  • @techguy3000

    In Soviet Russia, bad quality is always the best

  • @techguy3000 Stupid joke

  • @golHom2015 Take a joke man. Calm down.

  • @techguy3000 =)

  • stop dissin the russians theres r the best weapons in the world...

  • Ok! New YouBite rule ~ no more uploads from cell phones~

  • Oh man you russians are some realy ugly bastards. Hardly surprisng your girls all leave russia to become models in Europe and the US.

  • @Lusth0g ты русских то не трогай гамбургер ходячий \\\кусок жира\\лучше съешь хот дог и заткнись...уроды это вы у вас деже нет красивых баб все жирные как свиньи

  • НА Американских авианосцах работают женщины, на таких кораблях очень слабая дисциплина, и мораль. Есть даже проституция.

  • Thats the best landing I have ever seen from the Russians....

  • Poor Frogfoot... it bounced like hell!!

  • И один хер надо будет раком вас всех поставим, Россия очень сильная страна и когда надо МЫ воюем так как надо, Осетию вспомните, 3-4 дня и все...

  • ... it is pretty clear that Russia would never need to spend much in that kind of useless weaponry.

  • America to suck

  • feel more akin to the young Russian Sailors now...my son is in the Navy and was working the flight deck for 8 years.....was suppose to leave Japan before this weekend but looks now like he'll be there a few days/weeks more.... Rust, yep thats a constant battle on any ship.......scrape and paint...when its done there is more rust to do....

  • Russia's only carrier yey

  • @MultiAREE Why would Russians need carriers? They do not have the habbit to attack third world countries... at least not that often as USA does. Carriers are cheap toys to attack 3rd world countries. If USA attacked any serious country, forget about Russian (which it can clearly cannot beat, it will rather lose) but say France, US will see all its carriers evaporate under tactical nuclear missiles attacks. A tactical nuclear weapon is a small nuclear weapon made out for clearing bases ships etc.

  • @notgodsemigod Now, Russians have around 3000-4000 tactical nuclear warheads. US has how many? 10, 20? carriers?

    You do the maths.

  • @notgodsemigod You clearly have no idea how nuclear weapons work, how they are used and the delivery systems needed to put them on targets. The same can be said of you knowledge about Carrier Groups, you just don't understand them and your lack of knowledge shows very clearly here.

    Hang up...do some research on US Carrier Groups....then call back again, thanks.

  • @MrVonKruger Stop this silly game of "not knowing"... what is in there to know? Are you claiming that an aircraft carrier has any means of protection that will hopefully do somthing against tactical nuclear missiles (you do understand what are these?). Russians and Americans have 1000s of them and they are rusting in the piles. They would not even think it a second to exchange them in such a war. Russians can dedicate the 1% of them to wipe out ALL US carriers in the first half hour of the war.

  • @notgodsemigod Carriers are means of tranporting planes and related staff for attacking 3rd rate powers. They would never be employed against a world power - quite the opposite, they would be taken away from the action hoping that an enemy like Russia would wish to economise the 1% of its tactical nuclear missiles and not evaporate them together with the sea underneath them... which frankly I do not think it will be the case.

  • @notgodsemigod Which is why we used our carrier groups to take out what was the worlds 2nd largest military in 1991; Saddam Hussein's Iraq.

    Our carriers were specifically designed to take on the Soviet Union. Anybody else was easy.

  • @Capt777harris AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...­ no sorry Captain Harris... sorry for the laughter but AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHAH­AHAHAHAH 2nd... AHAHAHAHAHA largest.... milita... WHAT? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    Your carriers were never designed to take on the Soviet Union cos they are U S E L E S S. It suffices 1 tactical nuclear missile to evaporate 1 carrier and the 4-5 ships that follow it around it. And Russia has 1000s of them, you have what? 10,15 carriers?

  • @notgodsemigod Then you don't know the concept behind a carrier battle group. Most of a carrier's escorts are out of visual range of the carrier itself, over the horizon. Their fire control is integrated to protect the carrier from incoming missiles. That's also par of why the F-14s phoenix missile had a 100 mile range.

    You have over 1000 STRATEGIC warheads, not tactical. And you need preguided coordinates to launch an ICBM which is useless against a carrier. In short, get real.

  • @Capt777harris Captain my friend, for every strategic warhead out there there are at least 3 tactical ones (not to mention the undeclared ones). Not just Russians but Americans too. It is just Russians would not had built carriers to go fight against the Americans cos they know these toys can't do anything at all. Nuclear submarines on the contrary can do, as such both Russians and Americans did built lots of them. Any war between these two would imply singlehandedly exchange of missiles.

  • @Capt777harris Tactical missiles have usually a range of 500 to 3000km. Enough to kill any carrier that approaches. With 3000 tactical missiles, do you think that Russians would spare the 10-20 missiles they would need to neutralise the 100% of US carriers if Americans were stupid enough to send them anywhere near (near = 3000km) the Russian coastline? I personally do not consider Americans as dumb. USA built carriers to yield force over 3rd world countries. NOT agaist Russia.

  • @Capt777harris Russians built this lonely carrier too just in case they need it for any other type of military need, any other apart sending to war against US. Russians in military were concentrating in strategic advantage because they had far less needs to intervene around the world than Americans whose army is focused on moving around the world attacking 3rd world countries. Russians when they need to attack its usually just around their periphery and as such they send conventional land force.

  • @notgodsemigod Fuck you, России не к чему авианосцы, слишком большая цель для одной крылатой ракеты типа "Вулкан" подумай об этом придурок.

  • @galeo88 ... I think you missed @Capt777harris and you addressed it to me. I know very well that Russia does not need aircraft carriers and that is why they never bothered building such an expensive and useless (in a total war scenario) ship. As said aircraft carriers are only good for attacking third world countries around the traderoutes' axes. Russians built just one to have it just in case it is needed but it is certainly not a central part of the Russian military strategy and rightfully so

  • @notgodsemigod Yeah, now your just showing off such a lack of knowledge on this subject as its painfull to even read. You do not know ANYTHING about Carrier Groups or their capabilities, just that "they has planes". You've done ZERO research on this, and its so obvious to the point of incredibly, that you would continue to argue on this subject.

    However, I'll give you a shot, in text, at My ComCarGru 6: USS John F. Kennedy CV 67.

    Explain your system you will use and how you will attack.

  • what a quality!

  • I've always been thought at school that the Soviet Union were the aggressors during the Cold War, I grew up believing it, then I got to the point when I did some research on my own.Turns out Russia has only 1 carrier in service the USA has 11.The Aircraft carrier is the ultimate attack vehicle on the planet it can launch a successful strike half the globe away from it’s country- that’s aggression. Further more- America has been in 4 official wars since WWII Russia in only one... you do the maths

  • @NazarovVv are you retarded? the USSR had more then 1 carrier. today they only have one because they can't afford to upkeep there Navy.there slowly coming back but it's going to take some time.

    and yes the USSR was the Aggressor during the cold war, after all they took over half of Europe and did not give it back till the fall of the USSR

  • @Dogmeat1950, Buttin in but gotta correct you, in 91 (the USSR's final year) it had 1 aircraftcarrier in service, 2 under construction, 4 hybrid cruiser/carriers and 2 helicopter cruisers, Kuznetsov was the Soviets and now the Russians only true carrier.

  • @NazarovVv Russia was in Afghanistan dumb shit. god please tell me your not really this dumb.

  • @Dogmeat1950 And you weren't in Afganistan right? Killing the people you've trained to kill to fight the Russians lovely how the puppet wars backfire

  • @NazarovVv the USA is in Afghanistan because of 9/11. also many of the Taliban fighters are non-Afghany.

    also Afghanistan was never a puppet, just sent arms and aid to them, after the war we just stopped. never had a thing to do with there Government after there fight against the USSR

  • @NazarovVv You do the "Maths" and tell me how many nuclear weapons the Soviets had right before the USSR fell. Aircraft carriers are toys compared to megaton class nuclear weapons.. And 1 war? Its over half a dozen... The USSR may have been a pain in the ass, but they weren't dumb.. You sir, are dumb...

  • All I have to say is that Kuznetsov is vastly improved from the Kiev class carriers--and their Yak-35s. Those things were a Navy Cross just waiting to happen....

  • Russia's only Aircraft Carrier!!

  • Horrible quality. I imagine you downloaded this from another youtube user and posted it as your own.

  • 1 hand grenade will wooosh this crap to bottom of the ocean =)

  • @Maxigery One hand grenade would Whoosh you from the earth... Use it.

  • @MarkusNemesis xD This thing is really Crappy ! Soo sucking ugly

  • фразы то какие "гдето чтото загорелось внизу" или "ремонтируют кубрик уже несколько лет" )))).... состояние плачевное.....

  • Комментатор нтвшный - говно. либераст, на ху..., верней на кол.

  • Наши ничем не хуже японцеф, а все мы помним кто победил в пёрле харбора)))

  • noob

  • Жаль мало у нас авионесущих крейсеров.Точнее нехира нет...

  • @TheKIR82 А что за идея фикс с авианосцами. Флот должен быть обеспечен сообразно проводимой стратегии. Американцам авианосцы жизненно необходимы, и то дежурство осуществляет только "Энтерпрайз". Походу дожимают ресурс. У нас уже стратегия развития ВМФ озвучена - крупных кораблей в обозримом будущем не будет, как я понял. Нападать за океаном нам не на кого.

  • я никогда не знал, Су-25 вылетел с корабля

    

  • The lunchs of the russian navy are as disgusting as those of USN.

  • בקרוב תוכלו ... אתה רואה את הנשק שלך, כאשר ישראל הופכת להיות כמו גיהינום ... יבכו כמו תינוקות

  • пилоты дерьма, пища дерьма, страна дерьма. Канада должна только вторгнуться в Вас глупые распутники.

  • @RustyShackleford1776 Ну так вторгайтесь, ждем-с

  • @RustyShackleford1776 So take your chance! Or are you expecting someone to do the whole dirty job for you? "HAHAHAHAHA" doesn't require much courage

  • @arkonafun80 bla bla bla....

  • Comment removed

  • Unable to par ruski, I cant understand whats being said, so I have to rely on videos. All I can say is that wasn't landing the plane, that was crashing it

  • Amatures.

  • Comment removed

  • @RyeOnHam

    *Amateurs

  • @WunderDoob

    Armatures?

  • @RyeOnHam

    Amateur means "not professional".

    Armature means "Electricity.

    a.

    the part of an electric machine that includes the main current-carrying winding and in which the electromotive force is induced.

    b.

    the pivoted part of an electric device, as a buzzer or relay, that is activated by a magnetic field.

    c.

    the iron or steel applied across the poles of a permanent magnet to close it, or across the poles of an electromagnet to transmit a mechanical force.

    "

  • @WunderDoob

    Thanks for the lesson. I trying to make light of my mistake, not act all conceited like you seem to be.

  • @RyeOnHam

    *conceited

    Stuv dra kuznetzy vun za brun nas vadanya

  • Да,это не СССР....

  • admiral pedofil!

  • @tetisweed fuck you nazis idiot

  • @Mihalych1234 muhaul edey sosy mine xyu!

  • @tetisweed If you can't speak Russian, don't speak. And this admiral kuznetsov to you will curtail a head, if you is near to it

  • Russia - biggest subs, biggest planes, biggest helis, bigest nuclear bombs, ak47, golden eagle aircraft, fastest missiles, a lot of crazy RPG7, MOABs, bear bombers, 22831 t90 main battletanks mi28 kincking apaches asses, biggest emp bombs, vodka USA - A lot of porn vids, most fucked up people in the world, b2 spirit, ump45s. USA+RUSSIA= SEX, WAR and DRUGS

  • in soviet russia jet lands you!

  • very hard landing

  • worst quality ive ever seen

  • Landing on a boat that's moving is hard at the best of times, try doing it at night in a storm while running on fuck all do or die fuel. Unless you've really seen how easy or hard something is, you shouldn't say they're bad at it. I bet you wouldn't be saying their pilots are bad if they we're coming for you. You'd be finding a safe place to hide.

  • lol

  • wow russia has shity pilots

  • @ilgopeds4378 Ignorant -_-

  • @ilgopeds4378

    Search for "f22 crash". Jerk.

  • I sh*t on Fuc king cun tss amerikanisky. If not USA no good not profesional, no cool. What´s happens on the forrestal?. O yeah if thats was a russian ship is for sure she go the bottom?. O very professional the Navy...make a emergencie surface wipe off 70 "Japs" to impress a bunch of guest. Yeah Fire 7 Captains off command to be Tyranic, arbitrary, and dumbass. A woman too, the worst sure. Here not different of officers from every army in any age. Thats the point not different

  • @muyterco Russia is finest country :)), it does not fuck up, unlike few :@

  • At 1:13 what is that they are eating? In the bad video quality it looks like they're eating shit.

  • dumb fucks

  • Короче тут большинство - пиндосские мудланы!

  • Poor russians never really mastered the art of Carrier warfare like we did. 

  • @armor452 it takes decades to master it.. and russia isnt a true blue water navy. the chinese are trying but they are a long way off before they master it also ..and we have a long navel history :)

  • No offense but I wouldn't serve on the kuznetsov... Looks like a rusty piece of floating danger area mixed with chernobyl and not that professional and organized place like the U.S. carriers, although I know it is. But is surely don't look like one to me.

  • @gketchup777

    This isn't an aircraft carrier. Russia do not posess any. Its an aircraft carrying cruiser class ship. Russians are functional. Things dont have to shine in the sun to work properly. ;)

  • @DunnoWhoIam2

    It's not the shit but dog took a crap.

    Smartass.

  • russia sure likes to save its money by spending the bare minimum for operating a carrier

  • ur a really good flyer

  • Oh I get it that's a coffin carrier.

  • What the hell is that railing at 00:24 ??? Is that so russian naval aviators have something to guide them when landing???

    And why is everything so rusty like between 01:45 and 02:28

    Not real impressive...

  • The Soviet Union was my adversary during the cold war and quite impressive. First with cruise missiles, gas turbine propulsion and variable pitch screws. A true blue-water navy. Alas, many of the assets now are rotting next to piers. Not the same.

    A small fraction remains.

  • The game is: if you can bounce off the deck 5 times, you win a free trip!

    (Yeah... one way home!!! :-D)

  • Я в шоке! Нахера Су-25 на палубу сажать О_о ? Кто интересно додумался?

  • Су-39

  • заебали янки сука малолетки ебаные опять срач разводят толстожопые ублюдки, не один из пендосов сидящий тут дел не знает, а уже туда же. Что ты сделал для своей страны американский потребитель!

  • @maks86861

    ну как говорится кто на что горазд... а пиндосы всегда любили попи**** и повыё***. Помните Рэмбо? :))))

  • Pas beau l'avion,

    Carrément é dit non !

  • проебали блять все. остальное индусам продали(

  • Эта вещь красивая, ну нахрена она нам нужна? Нам бы получше ракеты, чтоб не одна падла американская на своих драндулетах нам не угрожала.

  • Comment removed

  • Конечно у нас ракеты лучше чем у вас пендоссов. И вообще нахeра комментируешь если русский не знаешь?