Bravo. There was a social experiment in the Metro area in NYC that tested the current appreciation of the arts. A world famous violinist played in a terminal. Of thousands, only 20 put money in his violin case, only 6 stopped to watch. I would have been the one to watch.
Any ways, the night before, Carnegie Hall was packed.
@rachelebusch that experiment makes no sense. passerbys probably heard a couple bars only, which isn't enough for classical pieces to express their ideas. people nowadays are used to listening to pop songs, which are constructed with hooks that are one or two bars. that people have less patience and want concise musical ideas doesn't mean they lack appreciation for the arts.
lol that was a weird experience...i though when i first saw the conductor that he looked a bit like Hugh Laurie >.< dunno why :D i can see it looks nothing like him...just one of my weirder moments i guess! this is a great piece, love it!
Mahler said there were not 2 bars at the same tempo ... So the tempo is one thing , the fluctuation inside the tempo from a bar to the following bar is another..
.
At this time , Einstein found E=mc² ...there is certainly something similar in the music ( Energy becomes mass and mass energy). Just as Mahler composed his symphony ,
Relativity considers time is not absolute ...The question of time (not only of tempo) in Mahler's symphonies is very interesting and philosophical .
this is the best illustration of this symphony, yes the tempo is a little fast but its the 1st time i heard it like this and im liking it. oh also too Valery Gergiev has always been knowen for his fast tempo
the one disadvantage of a quicker-than-average tempo in the march section is you have to maintain that tempo for the second subject (the 'Alma theme') also, which sacrifices the potential lyrical breadth of that theme
i like this pace of the piece it makes it feel like they are going to war and are trying to get to the battlefield. and they keep seeing tragedies on the way.
The basses are in charge of the tempo in the begining. That means they need to keep the tempo going or else the balence of time will be lost with the rest of the orchestra. It's like jazz band. It all comes down to basses.
@bellinianodoc You're depriving yourself of lots of potential for yourself if your first impressions of mahler are without doing some research, if you think mahler is noisy and empty, i'd strongly suggest songs of a wayfarer, instead something as loud the 6th, there's a reason it's the least popular symphony.
Thanks for politeness of your advice. But I think I’ve listened Malher enough to be struck by the almost complete emptyness of musical ideas in his works. And there's nothing worse in music than creative sterility put together with bombastic arrogance.
Schubert or Bellini, for example, can move to tears with four, slender notes. But they were true genius.
@bellinianodoc i'm sorry you see it that way, but yes, it does make sense. i can give examples of mahler doing the same with four notes, but i'd rather not start a flame war over nonsense. although der lindenbaum is quite a spectacle.
Yes - too fast. Way faster than I am used to and it sounds rushed as a result. The "stamping" rhythm at the opening should be a relentless plod not a superficial sprint. And the exposition beyond that should be given time to unfold, not romped-through. Compare youtube.com/watch?v=lPqUTl2aNMA&feature=related
@Kapputschino12 no..., no, no.., the tempo is great, really great !! I thought it was too fast , but after listen carefully I think Gergiev give a truly fabulous, superb !!!, is a fantastic and energic rendition !!
@Brunildilla Third and fourth bar are rushing, are faster than the first. That is terrible at that place. It ruins practically the whole symphony. You cant be insistent and rush at the same time. As I said, the problem is not the tempo but the rushing.
The orchestra plays wonderfully, the conductor finds a lot of amazing subtleties in the score, the dynamics are superb and all you can say is that the tempo is too fast? Why can't you just like a change in the standardized tempi, dear music lovers?
As Oscar Wild said "The cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing." Your critiscms of orchestras are childish and beneath any serious music lover. All orchestras are made up of human beings and conductors who all strive to do their best.
The musicians play with such expertise it makes this all look so easy! But we all know that is most certainly not the case . . . technically AND emotionally.
This (Gergiev/LSO) is the best recording I know of the opening movement to Mahler 6. It possesses a savage ferocity as well as an all-consuming beauty. Though many argue otherwise, I think the tempi are perfect. The marches need to be overwhelming. The moments of beauty need to be fleeting. The colors are magnificent. Hands down one of Mahler's most astounding yet puzzling movements despite the simplicity of its form compared to some other of his movements. One of his best symphonies!
@EDGJZConglomerate Yours is by far the best comment I've read thus far on YT. All of your statements are well substantiated & you use just the right adjectives; e.g., "savage ferocity." Written like a musicological mastermind.
I completely agree with you about Gergiev as a conductor, as well. He is "The Maestro" of the 21st century. My other favorite Mahler conductor was Karajan. I didn't like him for everything, but his somewhat cold, dissonant tone was perfect for the drama in much of Mahler.
@xerxes52 You are absolutely right. My mind must have escaped me when I posted my foolish comment. Looking back, I question why such words even escaped my fingertips. Truly, my mindset was regretable.
Absolutely, Jacotrumpet! Eschenbach actually becomes the music. You can see it in his eyes just before the opening. What is truly amazing is how he got a French orchestra to play Mahler as if their lives depended on it. Normally, they miss the point completely with Austro-Germanic music and should stick to Saint-Saens or Debussy! But you can see what wonders Eschenbach has done with that orchestra. I say it again: See Christophe Eschenbach & the Orchestre de Paris doing Mahler 6 on YouTube now!
Tomenicus I have Szell's version and I agree it is great. Sadly it has a major flaw: it doesn't have the exposition repeat in the first movement. In the days when it was recorded audiences couldn't take the length of these works, so cuts like this were made. Boyofdestiny, we're not arguing - just discussing. Mahler buffs are somewhat prone to discussing Mahler endlessly! And tempi are a hot potato. The tempo in mov't 1 of the 6th has to have gravitas but without any capelmeisterish pomp! :-)
I really don't think Mahler gets enough credit for his genius.
I don't think any of us should be arguing amongst ourselves about the tempo when really the important thing is that we all care and don't become the people who are obsessed with today's modern music: Rap, hip-hop, Heavy metal...
... Focus on your goal to care about the classics.
IMO, this is too fast and thus loses its darkness. Some conduct it too slow (eg. Boulez) and then it loses its bite and momentum. There has to be that biting darkness throughout. It's interesting that Mahler 9 is usually conducted well by most who tackle it; whereas Mahler 6 seems to present a challenge which very few can meet successfully. Even Bernstein doesn't get #6 like he did #9. For a truly astounding Mahler 6 performance & conducting see the vid with Eschenbach and the Orchestre de Paris
@alanmorrisonsongs NO! That is a little too slow. I have some like half a dozen recordings of Mahlers 6 and listen only of those of George Szell and Cleveland S.O. That was made... well, consequently. Try it and see, I'm mean hear of course...
@alanmorrisonsongs holy crap i see what u mean. i just watched some of eschenbach's and the orch de paris's rendition.. they are much more intense in thier quarter notes, but its not just taht- eschenbach really brings out dark colors from all over and does a much better job at creating the mood the piece calls for. thanx for the tip about watching the other vid :)
I've heard Gergiev with the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra,
conducting mahler /5/7/8/9 wich were really, really great
I have no doubt, he is capable to conduct Mahler's symphonies.
(Gergiev is going to conduct Mahler 2, Ressurection with the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra, on it's ''Gergiev Festival'', in Rotterdam, in September.
@LovVaBLeFiQa: I love it too, they play Paxmans if im right.
It is a performance plenty of energy and musical commentaries, contrasting and makes it so interesting. It think Mahler needs totally romanctic aproach, on tempis and sound, if not it sound too dry.
It is just a tad to fast, but this is preferrable to the dirge-like tempo Chailly took with the Concertgebouw. Abbado, Maazel, and Eschenbach took it a little slower and I think it gives the movement the kind of sweeping gandeur it needs without dragging it out.
Perfect version! (From every single point of view) Bravo, Maestro!!!
PS: Odinnshred, you are not serious... are you? The tempo is correct. You should check it again. I have a version by Bern. Htik. Deceive no more, please...
Although the music does work at this tempo (due entirely to Mahler's genius), Gergiev is conducting this far too quickly; the first movement of this fantastic symphony is supposed to be the obstinate and inevitable march of fate which, ultimately, consumes and destroys the composer. I doubt anybody would be afraid of an army of people with an obviously struggling gait trying to march as quickly as Gergiev would expect them to.
Haha the violist at 1:15, top right corner, made my day! Where the hell is his energy?! The "LSO Powerhouse Strings" label was achieved with no help from him! Paul Silverthorne and the others are doing all the work!
Other than that guy, it's a DAMN good interpretation - I swear by it. LSO is the best orchestra in the world.
I never could figure out why this wasn't one of Mahler's more famous symphonies. The march in the first movement blisters and crackles with a passion not normally found in 20th century music.
gergiev is just what london needs. i'm sure there are more than a few londoners still stammering around wondering what the hell is going on, even after a few years
Sometimes he asks for 9 nine horns, when the first part is doubled (because it is such a strain to play the high notes and the solo's all by yourself)
If you think this is too fast, you shouldn't listen to Kubelik's interpretation with the Symphonieorchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks. That's even faster.
I think this is the perfect tempo for this mouvement. It's not a funeral march!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
dont be stupid Valerij Abbisalovich Gergiev IS 10000000 % O S E T I A N
and we osetians proud of him and love him for he was in ZHIVALL to express hattress all osetian people for barbarian american agression against osetian people
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I must say: Gergiev is not the right conductor for this no 1 orchestra in the world, maybe for Shostakovich but not Mahler. To "squarish", no real emotions, he just beats the tempo, nothing more. They could have had MTT or Harding, that would have been something else! Even the Mahler 6th with LSO / Jansons is much better than this.
Perhaps it's just beacause he's not known for Mahler; people said similar things about Haitink when he started conducting Wagner purely because he'd always been known for his Mahler and Bruckner. I can't say either that I go along with your assessment of the LSO as the number 1 orchestra in the world; surely the Vienna, Berlin, Concertgebouw, Dresden and others produce a more polished and professional sound than the LSO musters. The Philharmonia is also an over-rated band, in my view.
Girl with a French Horn! Cute!
leppardas 6 days ago
Bravo. There was a social experiment in the Metro area in NYC that tested the current appreciation of the arts. A world famous violinist played in a terminal. Of thousands, only 20 put money in his violin case, only 6 stopped to watch. I would have been the one to watch.
Any ways, the night before, Carnegie Hall was packed.
rachelebusch 1 month ago
@rachelebusch that experiment makes no sense. passerbys probably heard a couple bars only, which isn't enough for classical pieces to express their ideas. people nowadays are used to listening to pop songs, which are constructed with hooks that are one or two bars. that people have less patience and want concise musical ideas doesn't mean they lack appreciation for the arts.
wuting0987 1 week ago
@wuting0987 well done
rachelebusch 1 week ago
Il a un air de Jack Nicholson dans "The Shinning"! :)
Balingeo 1 month ago
I thought Vanessa Mae was in this.
montclairification 1 month ago in playlist Music
The guy looks like that he's going to faint
hwq99818 2 months ago
this time he's using a horribly long toothpick :P
JWentu 2 months ago in playlist Valery Gergiev
Excellent .
KG22122 2 months ago
Simply amazing.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
lol that was a weird experience...i though when i first saw the conductor that he looked a bit like Hugh Laurie >.< dunno why :D i can see it looks nothing like him...just one of my weirder moments i guess! this is a great piece, love it!
Nadz3813 3 months ago
I pressed "Like" before watching it
Hassaanness 4 months ago 3
where's this?
martimtavares 5 months ago
@martimtavares this was recorded at the LSO's home venue, the Barbican Centre in London
Lso 4 months ago
HE IS THE DOCTOR HOUSE OF CONDUCTING!!!
honron21 5 months ago 2
When I watch Gergiev conduct, sometimes he makes me think of torches, pitchforks and vampire fangs :o)
jamieblond1 5 months ago
Time Bandits anyone?
ErinaceousOutrageous 5 months ago
Prekrasnoooo...Jedva čekam da čujem uživo u Zagrebu...!!!
hergotics 7 months ago in playlist Gergijev
@morristhemoron
when you listen it live it's a different thing ! don't make comparison between that and youtube
Lucian86 7 months ago
I like how at 1:00 the 2nd horn had a total brain fart. Nice to see that even the finest musician in the world have those moments too.
cpthornman 7 months ago
I prefer these darker classical pieces, any others like this?
Interioroutbreak69 7 months ago 2
@Interioroutbreak69 You can't go wrong with Mahler.
PCFDD 7 months ago 3
Mahler said there were not 2 bars at the same tempo ... So the tempo is one thing , the fluctuation inside the tempo from a bar to the following bar is another..
.
At this time , Einstein found E=mc² ...there is certainly something similar in the music ( Energy becomes mass and mass energy). Just as Mahler composed his symphony ,
Relativity considers time is not absolute ...The question of time (not only of tempo) in Mahler's symphonies is very interesting and philosophical .
jeanpi314159 8 months ago 2
From the dimensions of the video you can see they're travelling at near warp-speed.
musoderelict 8 months ago
From the video, you can see they're travelling at near warp-speed.
musoderelict 8 months ago
The alma theme sounds like shes running through central park
pointreyes6 9 months ago
this is the best illustration of this symphony, yes the tempo is a little fast but its the 1st time i heard it like this and im liking it. oh also too Valery Gergiev has always been knowen for his fast tempo
alliancedie 9 months ago
this is the best illustration of this symphony, yes the tempo is a little fast but its the 1st time i heard it like this and im liking it.
alliancedie 9 months ago
the one disadvantage of a quicker-than-average tempo in the march section is you have to maintain that tempo for the second subject (the 'Alma theme') also, which sacrifices the potential lyrical breadth of that theme
just sayin'
AntiProUltra 9 months ago
i like this pace of the piece it makes it feel like they are going to war and are trying to get to the battlefield. and they keep seeing tragedies on the way.
knifenewbie456 10 months ago
พวกกดดิสไลท์
ควายละ ไม่มีหัวใจดนตรี!!
NANPASA17 10 months ago
@NANPASA17
May be you are right , may be not : isikoa anao mitendrinesa , azono raha volaniko ...that's what I tell you .
jeanpi314159 8 months ago
Probably seems fast to me too because I'm used to the Philharmonia/Sinopoli recording
gabamanutube 10 months ago
The basses are in charge of the tempo in the begining. That means they need to keep the tempo going or else the balence of time will be lost with the rest of the orchestra. It's like jazz band. It all comes down to basses.
McFlury9687 10 months ago
2nd trombone looks like Jermaine from Flight of the Conchords
fuzzynavel46 10 months ago 15
Too fast or too slow, it's always the usual Mahler: bombastic, empty of ideas, that makes a lot of noise, simply not knowing where to go.
According with Natalie Bauer-Lechner, a Mahler's friend, he said that often his musical ideas were suggested in a dream by Beethoven or Wagner...
What ludicrous bullshit.
bellinianodoc 10 months ago
@bellinianodoc You're depriving yourself of lots of potential for yourself if your first impressions of mahler are without doing some research, if you think mahler is noisy and empty, i'd strongly suggest songs of a wayfarer, instead something as loud the 6th, there's a reason it's the least popular symphony.
imsleepyanddead 10 months ago
@imsleepyanddead
Thanks for politeness of your advice. But I think I’ve listened Malher enough to be struck by the almost complete emptyness of musical ideas in his works. And there's nothing worse in music than creative sterility put together with bombastic arrogance.
Schubert or Bellini, for example, can move to tears with four, slender notes. But they were true genius.
bellinianodoc 10 months ago
@bellinianodoc i'm sorry you see it that way, but yes, it does make sense. i can give examples of mahler doing the same with four notes, but i'd rather not start a flame war over nonsense. although der lindenbaum is quite a spectacle.
imsleepyanddead 10 months ago
Yes - too fast. Way faster than I am used to and it sounds rushed as a result. The "stamping" rhythm at the opening should be a relentless plod not a superficial sprint. And the exposition beyond that should be given time to unfold, not romped-through. Compare youtube.com/watch?v=lPqUTl2aNMA&feature=related
KiwiExpat34 11 months ago
@KiwiExpat34 There are no "relentless plods" in a piece written to be "fast and lively". Consider it the speed with which death takes us all.
Wranger243 11 months ago
Garbich
callasnuts 11 months ago
The Thomas Sanderling recording is the greatest performance i have ever heard.
Mahler told me that Gergiev's tempo here is just too fast and not marchable.
pointreyes6 11 months ago
@pointreyes6 You should listen Neeme Järvi, he does it even faster :D
Impressionist1 11 months ago
oh my! ...is that Jemaine from Flight of the Conchords @ 1:08
danesandy 11 months ago 2
buena
intelectus1 11 months ago
One of my favourite scores! :-)
JonBrooksComposer 11 months ago
Strings are out of tune many, many places. Not everything in life you can solve looking like a Gone-mad-Rasputin.
Kapputschino12 11 months ago
The problem is not the tempo. The problem is the rushing. Its like the basses are in another hall trying not to loose tempo. Horrible, really.
Kapputschino12 1 year ago
@Kapputschino12 no..., no, no.., the tempo is great, really great !! I thought it was too fast , but after listen carefully I think Gergiev give a truly fabulous, superb !!!, is a fantastic and energic rendition !!
Brunildilla 11 months ago
@Brunildilla Third and fourth bar are rushing, are faster than the first. That is terrible at that place. It ruins practically the whole symphony. You cant be insistent and rush at the same time. As I said, the problem is not the tempo but the rushing.
Kapputschino12 11 months ago
The orchestra plays wonderfully, the conductor finds a lot of amazing subtleties in the score, the dynamics are superb and all you can say is that the tempo is too fast? Why can't you just like a change in the standardized tempi, dear music lovers?
GabMelonius 1 year ago
Best symphony to listen to whilst walking.
fayemarilynh 1 year ago
Aaaaaaaaaaaand..........Gergiev looks demented from 0:01-4:02.
aang94479 1 year ago
As Oscar Wild said "The cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing." Your critiscms of orchestras are childish and beneath any serious music lover. All orchestras are made up of human beings and conductors who all strive to do their best.
mibi1946 1 year ago 3
very well.
Roozbeh218 1 year ago
No toothpick? :(
unitednerdsbeproud 1 year ago
where can i find the whole movement from lso?
guitarvibe75 1 year ago
no me gusta. esta demasiado energico. agitato. la orquesta espectacular. no se como pueden seguir los gestos del director.
faemdia 1 year ago
no me gusta. esta demasiado energico. agitato. la orquesta espectacular no se como pueden seguir los gestos del director.
faemdia 1 year ago
Never listened to music that makes me so happy.
SThpunk1 1 year ago
Valery Gergiev looks like he just escaped from an asylum, a prison, or both.
but that has nothing to do with his great skill, of course!
heirihunziker 1 year ago 2
fantastico...
destroydavid 1 year ago
8 people missed the like button
SuckerForRockers 1 year ago 3
Gergiev is THE BOMB! So is the LSO! Love it!
curtalguy 1 year ago 3
Amazing! Mahler was such a genius, so intelligent, he really composed a magic music, mistic, music for soul and at the same time music for brain...
0707NicePlayer 1 year ago
This should say that it was an excerpt. How disappointing!
falstocat 1 year ago
The musicians play with such expertise it makes this all look so easy! But we all know that is most certainly not the case . . . technically AND emotionally.
EDGJZConglomerate 1 year ago
This (Gergiev/LSO) is the best recording I know of the opening movement to Mahler 6. It possesses a savage ferocity as well as an all-consuming beauty. Though many argue otherwise, I think the tempi are perfect. The marches need to be overwhelming. The moments of beauty need to be fleeting. The colors are magnificent. Hands down one of Mahler's most astounding yet puzzling movements despite the simplicity of its form compared to some other of his movements. One of his best symphonies!
EDGJZConglomerate 1 year ago 6
@EDGJZConglomerate Yours is by far the best comment I've read thus far on YT. All of your statements are well substantiated & you use just the right adjectives; e.g., "savage ferocity." Written like a musicological mastermind.
I completely agree with you about Gergiev as a conductor, as well. He is "The Maestro" of the 21st century. My other favorite Mahler conductor was Karajan. I didn't like him for everything, but his somewhat cold, dissonant tone was perfect for the drama in much of Mahler.
unclejuniorsoprano 2 months ago
Gergiev and Mahler simply don't mix well, in my opinion. He is a superb conductor of the Russian repertory, but falls short with Mahler.
jgesselberty 1 year ago
皆さん、こんばんは
直言極限の時間です
bikiniboys 1 year ago
Too fast! That's no horse-race!
007strauss 1 year ago
Excellent
konanuk 1 year ago
So fast!
But perhaps this is his character. Nonetheless, the fire he shows in Mahler 2 and 6 is stunning.
iplongnin 1 year ago
It's fast enough, slowing it down facks it up
clearevil 1 year ago
Wow, just superb playing. Nice low brass <3. Damn, the horns are pretty tight too. The whole orchestra is just amazing sounding.
LLJtbone 1 year ago
@xerxes52 You are absolutely right. My mind must have escaped me when I posted my foolish comment. Looking back, I question why such words even escaped my fingertips. Truly, my mindset was regretable.
drengnikrafe 1 year ago
Uses the oboes really nicely. Awfully tense, Mahlerian symphonies. Imagine what he must have been feeling when writing this.
amistrymister 1 year ago
i wish there was a video of gergiev conducting mahler 5....that would be bad ass.
mercer240 1 year ago
Absolutely, Jacotrumpet! Eschenbach actually becomes the music. You can see it in his eyes just before the opening. What is truly amazing is how he got a French orchestra to play Mahler as if their lives depended on it. Normally, they miss the point completely with Austro-Germanic music and should stick to Saint-Saens or Debussy! But you can see what wonders Eschenbach has done with that orchestra. I say it again: See Christophe Eschenbach & the Orchestre de Paris doing Mahler 6 on YouTube now!
alanmorrisonsongs 1 year ago
I read about this song while looking for epic, dark music. I got exactly what I was looking for. Win.
drengnikrafe 1 year ago
@drengnikrafe It's not a song
xerxes52 1 year ago
Tomenicus I have Szell's version and I agree it is great. Sadly it has a major flaw: it doesn't have the exposition repeat in the first movement. In the days when it was recorded audiences couldn't take the length of these works, so cuts like this were made. Boyofdestiny, we're not arguing - just discussing. Mahler buffs are somewhat prone to discussing Mahler endlessly! And tempi are a hot potato. The tempo in mov't 1 of the 6th has to have gravitas but without any capelmeisterish pomp! :-)
alanmorrisonsongs 1 year ago
I really don't think Mahler gets enough credit for his genius.
I don't think any of us should be arguing amongst ourselves about the tempo when really the important thing is that we all care and don't become the people who are obsessed with today's modern music: Rap, hip-hop, Heavy metal...
... Focus on your goal to care about the classics.
boyofdestiny1123 1 year ago
this has more contrast in tempo then one is used to
dajohnthomas69 1 year ago
IMO, this is too fast and thus loses its darkness. Some conduct it too slow (eg. Boulez) and then it loses its bite and momentum. There has to be that biting darkness throughout. It's interesting that Mahler 9 is usually conducted well by most who tackle it; whereas Mahler 6 seems to present a challenge which very few can meet successfully. Even Bernstein doesn't get #6 like he did #9. For a truly astounding Mahler 6 performance & conducting see the vid with Eschenbach and the Orchestre de Paris
alanmorrisonsongs 1 year ago
@alanmorrisonsongs NO! That is a little too slow. I have some like half a dozen recordings of Mahlers 6 and listen only of those of George Szell and Cleveland S.O. That was made... well, consequently. Try it and see, I'm mean hear of course...
tomenicus 1 year ago
@alanmorrisonsongs holy crap i see what u mean. i just watched some of eschenbach's and the orch de paris's rendition.. they are much more intense in thier quarter notes, but its not just taht- eschenbach really brings out dark colors from all over and does a much better job at creating the mood the piece calls for. thanx for the tip about watching the other vid :)
jacotrumpet 1 year ago
I've heard Gergiev with the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra,
conducting mahler /5/7/8/9 wich were really, really great
I have no doubt, he is capable to conduct Mahler's symphonies.
(Gergiev is going to conduct Mahler 2, Ressurection with the Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra, on it's ''Gergiev Festival'', in Rotterdam, in September.
@LovVaBLeFiQa: I love it too, they play Paxmans if im right.
martinusB95 1 year ago
Wow !!was für eine Bühnenpräsenz! Gergiev ist grandios!
Mainharfa 1 year ago
simplesmente o que há de melhor no ramo sinfonico!!
mouraviola 1 year ago
Too fast? Better than Haitink ~ too slow...
doubleotwentyone 1 year ago
i love the sound of french horn!!!
LoVaBLeFiQa 1 year ago
A bit too fast, IMHO
007strauss 1 year ago
I like so much Gergiev since " Firebird" ....
You making me love this tragic symphony , usualy i prefer the ressurection or Titan ....
Thanks To LSO
Need the 4 th mouvement please :=)
Maralegar2009 1 year ago
Bravo, orchestra! Bravo, Maestro!
lusilla1 1 year ago
So emotive - love it!
Thanks to the LSO for posting.
JonBrooksComposer 1 year ago
It is a performance plenty of energy and musical commentaries, contrasting and makes it so interesting. It think Mahler needs totally romanctic aproach, on tempis and sound, if not it sound too dry.
ilbacioditosca 1 year ago
It is just a tad to fast, but this is preferrable to the dirge-like tempo Chailly took with the Concertgebouw. Abbado, Maazel, and Eschenbach took it a little slower and I think it gives the movement the kind of sweeping gandeur it needs without dragging it out.
Mahlerialiszt 2 years ago
Perfect version! (From every single point of view) Bravo, Maestro!!!
PS: Odinnshred, you are not serious... are you? The tempo is correct. You should check it again. I have a version by Bern. Htik. Deceive no more, please...
Violetatorelli 2 years ago
Although the music does work at this tempo (due entirely to Mahler's genius), Gergiev is conducting this far too quickly; the first movement of this fantastic symphony is supposed to be the obstinate and inevitable march of fate which, ultimately, consumes and destroys the composer. I doubt anybody would be afraid of an army of people with an obviously struggling gait trying to march as quickly as Gergiev would expect them to.
odinnshred 2 years ago 2
Haha the violist at 1:15, top right corner, made my day! Where the hell is his energy?! The "LSO Powerhouse Strings" label was achieved with no help from him! Paul Silverthorne and the others are doing all the work!
Other than that guy, it's a DAMN good interpretation - I swear by it. LSO is the best orchestra in the world.
absmart 2 years ago 4
agreed. LSO For the Win. my no. 1 favorite orchestra
USAFp90x 1 year ago
Outstanding version! Bravo, Maestro!!!
Violetatorelli 2 years ago 4
HfM&Co.
princegarbsen 2 years ago
This is just amazing music.
One of my favorite pieces, and some of the best music ever written.
EDGJZConglomerate 2 years ago 16
Since Einstein time is relative, so is tempi..
quinto34 2 years ago
and the Atoms started to be broken everywhere, and we know the results.
Many scientists quit atomic research because they know is not good.
ilbacioditosca 1 year ago
@ilbacioditosca You can quit whatever you like, time is still relative..and so is tempi lol
quinto34 1 year ago
my god, you rock.
sereda008 2 years ago 2
i love it, but i agree it might be a bit too fast. but that gives it more energy for the crowd
culturejamming 2 years ago
Too fast? Try explaining "ma non troppo" to a Russian. ;)
No, really, I like it. It's definitely not over the top.
dragmio 2 years ago 57
@dragmio Definitely not too fast. Similar to Georg Solti's recording with the CSO.
foodmore 9 months ago
Much too fast ...
Wolfinho007 2 years ago
I agree completely.
suumr 2 years ago
in my point of viwe the rithm is a bit too hight and the violin is not enough present in the 10 first seconds...
am39exocet 2 years ago
I never could figure out why this wasn't one of Mahler's more famous symphonies. The march in the first movement blisters and crackles with a passion not normally found in 20th century music.
RationalDischarge 2 years ago 3
Faster then I'm used to, but it's exciting, I like :)
quinto34 2 years ago 6
gergiev is just what london needs. i'm sure there are more than a few londoners still stammering around wondering what the hell is going on, even after a few years
tzhuff 2 years ago 2
i love how characteristically russian he looks
twigglesjworth 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Conductors are over-rated and bloated with self-importance. They are absolutely ridiculous.
justiceleague3000 2 years ago
Well, at this tempo it doesn't sound much like any Mahler I know, but it's certainly exciting.
etucker82 2 years ago
I'm really so amused on the comments on here about this movement being the Imperial march from StarWars . but then again this is u tube ....
moopsymoo 2 years ago
Sometimes he asks for 9 nine horns, when the first part is doubled (because it is such a strain to play the high notes and the solo's all by yourself)
MarkoKassenaar 2 years ago
I'll have whatever the director is having, ( with all due respect)
comaradella 2 years ago 3
hahaha, he always moves like that. And yes, to watch it IRL is really electrifying!
MarkoKassenaar 2 years ago
im with you one that one
munky6933 2 years ago
HOLY CRAP!!! There are 8 french horns!! Aren't there usually only around four or five? Doesn't matter! HORN POWER!! hehe
blackmoon092 2 years ago 4
Mahler actually specifies 8 French Horns for the instrumentation of this symphony - But yeah, you're right, it provides massive power on that front:)
DSCHShostaMaestro 2 years ago
reminds me of imperial march
endlsswing 2 years ago
HOW?
crawfordsjamie 2 years ago
Imperial March from Star Wars :)
Bethreze 2 years ago
It isn't exactly the same, but I can hear the similarity as well. Particularly the opening, but the rest of it as well.
CarzorStelatis 2 years ago
Yeah. I played mahlers 2nd yesterday. He calls for 8 horns, something like 8 trumpets, 4 trombones. Loud.
cellofellow1223 2 years ago
He calls 8 horns for 1st symphony, too
porq2esmejorq1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's much too fast!!!!
Scissors8311 2 years ago
If you think this is too fast, you shouldn't listen to Kubelik's interpretation with the Symphonieorchester des Bayerischen Rundfunks. That's even faster.
I think this is the perfect tempo for this mouvement. It's not a funeral march!
hanserblich 2 years ago 4
i think it's only a BIT too fast. well, the tempo is marked allegro energico ma non troppo, right?
iwanabana 2 years ago
You're correct.
sirmattbelios 2 years ago
Listen to this performance adding &fmt=18.
You'll just murmur Bravo ...
bekkaannnn 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
dont be stupid Valerij Abbisalovich Gergiev IS 10000000 % O S E T I A N
and we osetians proud of him and love him for he was in ZHIVALL to express hattress all osetian people for barbarian american agression against osetian people
osetian111 2 years ago
Excuse me if I'm curious, but what has Gergiev's nationality to do with watching this video in HQ?
xthorl 2 years ago 2
amazing
eliasaris 3 years ago
My favorite Mahler movement after the finale of Symphony No. 7.
ThaSchwab 3 years ago
Interesting point of view. But I don´t think any other orchestra can sound so together and on the beat as the LSO. That´s a fact.
webrunnerqw 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I must say: Gergiev is not the right conductor for this no 1 orchestra in the world, maybe for Shostakovich but not Mahler. To "squarish", no real emotions, he just beats the tempo, nothing more. They could have had MTT or Harding, that would have been something else! Even the Mahler 6th with LSO / Jansons is much better than this.
webrunnerqw 3 years ago
Perhaps it's just beacause he's not known for Mahler; people said similar things about Haitink when he started conducting Wagner purely because he'd always been known for his Mahler and Bruckner. I can't say either that I go along with your assessment of the LSO as the number 1 orchestra in the world; surely the Vienna, Berlin, Concertgebouw, Dresden and others produce a more polished and professional sound than the LSO musters. The Philharmonia is also an over-rated band, in my view.
rabengeraun 3 years ago 10