attention all demolition experts,theres no need to bring buildings down using expensive ex plosives and months of hard work.set fire to the buildings in a few scattered locations and watch them fall into their own footprint.sounds plausible doesnt it.
Michael Rudin..learn how to conduct interviews. First year journalism student is better than you. Im shocked that you haven't been fired from job because you obviously are not good at all.
1. Det sørgeligt at se, hvor mange der har set denne video.
2. Hvis man er velsignet med bare en gnist af fornuft, så kan man se, at Dr. Niels Harrit har ret og at Michael Rudin hele tiden prøver på at forsvare den officielle konspirationsteorie.
3. Jeg ville give alt for at kunne se de 86 optagelser af den såkaldte Boing 757 der skulle have ramt den bedst sikrede bygning på denne klode.
4. Jeg håber, fra min ''inner voice'' af, at denne hændelse bliver opklaret og at retfærdigheden sejrer.
Why is this journalist so aggressive: because the british involvement in of Irak completely disqualify BBC as a democratic counterpower. They have completely fail to opppose Tony Blair in what was the most patent forgery of all time (saddam WMD). The only way they can avoid to loose face is to show that on the other bush war, the administration was right and that there was reason to follow the official line.
But eventually everybody knows what america stands for in history.
This is the same american administration that delivered the official story about Irak and 9/11.
According to medias, who have the monopole of the official truth 9/11 official vesion is accurate, Irak's i is a complete forgery made up by administration.
Irak is enough hard evidence to bring busk administration on an international trial for crime against humanity in Irak.
They'll see what they can do about afghanistan, if it is a hostile war covered up aby a fake, or an actual defensive war,
The blueprint for the invasion and occupation of the Middle East was outlined in a 1997 book by former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, called "Grand Chessboard". Everything done in the Middle East since 1997 is based on his book. Syria, Lebanon and Iran are the last 3 nations to attack. Is it ALL about oil? Yes. How to justify it all? USA is the tough guy, who answer to nobody. It is immoral and illegal. The WH , DOD and CIA listen to nobody. Big wars = Big money 4 War Merchants
I had this guy in Organic Chemestry. Niels Harrit regardless of what the truth might turn out to be (and things are not looking good for the official story), you're a darn hero in my book. Keep questioning.
Oh yes and Rudin is being an absolute ass. Harrit's patience was admirable, and acting top professional.
I know Mr. Rudin is doing his job but on the subject of the Pentagon he is clearly ignorant to the fact that all Dr. Neils is asking for is hard evidence!!! He's perfectly right when he says "I'm a scientist and my traing has always lead to hard facts and not secondary info from Mr. Rudin" He's perfectly right. I'm sorry guys I have to give Kudos to the Dr. who has 42 yrs in experince in the fieled. He's asking for a court of law. Full stop!!!!!!!
I took flying lessons 35 yrs ago and my instructor suggested I was ready to solo after 17 hours of lessons. I flew solo after about 27 hours. I have flown for 35 years and know at least 200 commercial pilots. Every single one thinks 9-11 is a gov fraud and those planes were crashed via remote control, not some half baked arab flunkies.
@StlCardnalz - Well, if you live in St. Louis take a bow. It is the highest crime infested city in America and its residents rated the meanest in America. So, why brag about living in the toilet bowl of America.
This reporter is quite ignorant of the FBI. there have been dozens of cases of corrupt FBI agents, lying about investigations. All of the pre 9-11 evidence that pointed to some type of large scale attack was crushed by high level corrupt FBI bosses. The FBI covered up the JFK murder and I heard that from a man who was part of the JFK investigation in Dallas after Nov 22,1963. FBI is as corrupt as CIA and DOD. That is why JFK was trying to dismantle them.
reporter is a lousy questioner. He is arguing, not asking questions. He is told to hold to a Point of View, the one his employer holds. Pathetic reporter.
i'm so glad we have abolished peer reviewed journals to determine conclusive facts and now just have to do bbc interviews. no need to present evidence to support counterclaims and give a record of how you obtained your findings in an academic response. just tell the bbc about paint that even NIST didn't report on- it has to be believed its the BBC
with all due respect to Niels, the truth movement has hundreds of people that could destroy this interviewer. they do not want to put a native english speaker who knows the intricacies of the plot inside and out.
Dr Harrit reminds me of the Trawler man, working hard in difficult conditions, dedicated to providing for mans nourishment, the interviewer reminds me of a sick gannet, scrabbling for tit bits the boat leaves in it's wake, regurgitating it's previous morsels, while continually trying to satiate it's own appetite. It seems this bbc isn’t interested in truth, only status-quo-esque illusion.
Lot's of valid points to point out, especially the points that need pointing to, not an exercise in pointless pointing but a point of fact to point at for the point of pointing out a point worth pointing at........''Mediocre hacks thrive and proliforate'' - Bill Hicks
hmm...guess the ''reporters'' favorite song youtube.com/watch?v=dndAXxqJbc0
Fuck off loser you know NOTHING about 911 asshole.
911studies . com/911photostudies118x.htm
WTC 6 DEMOED just b4 the 2nd plane hit.
Just deny-deny-deny bitchboy. hahahaa YOU are shit.You read ONE document & you know everything? HAHAHA Niels Harrits? ONE PERSON? fucking moronic asshole loser.
if this interviewer was a college student working towards a degree he would fail the class. If a person walks into court and says the defendant was with them but DNA puts the person at the scene the witness is fully discredited. What I don't get is that the most guarded building the world gets attached and the only security video is from a gas station across the street?
On the topic of the "Student Pilots", who could not even fly a Cessna training plane, but could, a Boeing 757:
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well - FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.
Source: "Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" - BBC News.
@ctcole77 im not the expert, but its obvious government and (becoming more and more obvious) that corporate media too, are corrupt. so what corrupts them? MONEY???? what is the root cause of hte corruption? why do we 100% believe what the govt says about 9/11 when they typically lie about everything else? those were my main points. also, why wasnt bush under oath. he used to run an oil company and the vice prez used to be CEO of halliburton. do you think that may influence them in anyway?
@ctcole77 how can a bunch of terrorists get past the most protected air space in the world, including getting past f-15s? bush, gondoleeza, and i believe cheney all said "we never predicited airplanes being used as weapons for terror." REALLY???? i find that hard to believe that no one that worked for defense OR govt thought of that ever.
@lee0122333 Actually the PentaCon had exact drills on planes crashing into the pentagon building & a number of drills were held concerning the WTC being attacked & they were even painted on the cover of the report. BOTH FACTS. ctcole is a fucking lying troll & constantly LIES about everything concerning 911. May he burn in hell.
@ctcole77 If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit? LYING CUNT.
the planes sat on the runways for over an hour scumbag LIAR.
LOL HAHAHAHA STILL UP TO YOUR OLD LYING TRICKS DOUCHEBAG? YUP.
Forensic proof by who? This isnt CSI you idiot. Who to you think the so called "forensic experts" consult regarding the scientific anomalies of their investigations?? Scientists!! Be it through direct contact or through scientific journals and publications.
Tell me, all these so called individual experts, scientists, engineers etc. who support that 9/11 was some sort of govt conspiracy, has it not occured to them that they should put their minds together and create a simulation of the event??!
this journalist is such an ignorant basterd makes me wanna puke ... it is obvious that this guy has been bribed or threatened i dont know but it is so clear what the professor says and this jerk keeps on trying to put words in his mounth..... Mr. Niels your work is great keep on!! o jornalista é um imbecil...der Journalist ist ein Penner ...
@ 14:00 Niels is Niels is saying that building 7 couldnt have come down due to the small fires. Rudin the applies that he interpreted the pictures as there were great fires in the building. Then Niels is ABOUT to say that it wouldnt even matter if the fires were whatever great ... but the "appearently" stupid non competent interwiever says trhet is has great importance and that Niels's schientific evidence is build on a wrong interpretation of the greatness of the fires..
Rudin cites Dr Richard Fruehan in order to discredit Dr Harrit, if Rudin had done any real background work he would know Fruehan's institute receives hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, hardly independent.
Rudin in a insult to journalism, 1:00 no motive!!! errr we're on the verge of a 3rd war for Israel's benefit and he says no motive!!!
I think I can speak for the majority of people here when I say this interviewer is a complete arsehole, I live in the UK and this is typical BBC, I hate them so much, that is why I have never bought a TV Licence in my life and never will.
What a awful biast journalist Michael Rudin is. With him making programs for the BBC we have no hope of any objectivity. He just wouldn't listen and had a bullying aggressive tone throughout. Clearly a tactic to get Niels to react in a negative manner so he would have something negative to use for his edit. This seems the style they teach the BBC borg. The best bit was "well i met someone from the FBI who said they had evidence isn't that enough for you?" Very high Quality journalism!
Check out Wikipedia's list of Logical Fallacy, and try and find one of them that Michasel Rudin has missed!...A Trained BBC Orwellian Ministry of Truth Hit Man.
The reporter keeps asking him, "do you believe this, and do you believe that."
That is the problem here. Mainstream media has turned 9/11 into a religion. I mean to say it's all just what people are willing to believe. This is not a reasonable approach.
Where is the hard evidence, facts, and proof?
It seems as if either the US government wants conspiracy theories to developed or 9/11 was really an inside job involving a cover up.
This BBC guy is a gatekeeper. The number of fallacies he spouts out are too numerous to mention: "Most people believe..." (irrelevant, where's the evidence); "You don't know the last national poll..." (irrelevant); the constant appeal to secondary evidence and hearsay, e.g. "Some FBI women saw evidence" (so show me the evidence then); "Where do you think [the Pentagon] plane went?" (irrelevant, speculation).
Rudin, how can you sleep at night? Do you really call yourself a journalist? It's painfully obvious to any educated person who watches this video, or the other biased media you present, that you are indeed a paid propagandist. You dismiss Harrit's valid points completely and try to drill as deeply and ferociously as possible into him where you feel you may have an edge. Are you questioning (or should I say attacking) the other side as relentlessly as you did this man? Journalism = objective
As a British citizen it saddens me that we produce idiots like this journalist. Such an obvious attempt in trying to get the professor to pick a side. That's the point though isnt it? There is no side, only facts of what actually took place on that tragic day. We know something is a miss here. We know the evidence is showing us that we have jumped to a conclusion too quickly. Its not our fault we didnt see it straight away and its definately not too late to look back!
Michael Rudin, this is the worst possible interview imaginable. How did the BBC fall to such lows? Dr. Niels Harrit is clear, precise and incredibly patient despite your aggressive, disrespectful interview. The conclusion is obvious and sad: the BBC is now nothing more than a propaganda machine. Shame on you, Rudin.
Thanks for uploading -this is great stuff. The BBC interviewer is desperate to get Dr Harit to theorise or give his own opinion so he can brand him a "conspiracy nut"- its so obvious.
The Official story only needs to be shown that its FALSE - there is no obligation on anyone to prove anything otherwise (i.e re inside job) - in order for a criminal investigation to be valid
journalists have to much power over the public opinion, they can ignore stuff that dont fit into their agenda, and they can cherry pick comments that fit into their agenda.
He was asking Harrit about a motive for the attacks 100 times, this "journalist" obviously had an agenda before doing the interview to twist the facts into his agenda.
It is not civilized and I fear for the future, if we dont stop this kind of media manipulation.
How can anyone reject the evidence of a witness who actually SAW the Loch Ness monster? Witnesses are the very essence of a court of law. Except, of course, that the BBC “reporter” is offering hearsay evidence that would be accepted in NO US court.
the carnegie mellon professors say that it isn't worth their time to review the papers which they claim are quite easy to debunk but instead chose to spend their time with this BCC propagandist
Does Rudin understand that if scientists want to prove their theory, that the red/gray chips found in ground Zero dust, is a specialised paint, they can PROVE it by undertaking research and publishing their findings. These scientists don't, which should tell the nicompoop interviewer something.
At this moment of the interview, he treats Harrit like he is a complete dill, despite Harrit being a chemistry professor with decades of experience!
This is hilarious. A total hack "journalist" trying to interrogate a professor emeritus of chemistry. Like a retard trying to question a genius. Like a little leaguer trying to question a major leaguer.
Hey Rudin, do a quick search for molten iron on Youtube to hear Firefighters explain seeing rivers of molten iron running past them. You are just a mouth piece for the lamestream media. Do some research.
@ConspiracyNut there is a new group starting ,i think they were thinking of you when they started it ,based on your obvious lack of higher brain function ..."Fuckwits 4 frontal lobotomies" You look like a promising member, can you get your mum to sign you up?
a clear example and proof, that bbc and many more massmedia assets are part of the crime AND covering up the lie in attacking and defaming every person with a sane mind who knows that 911 is a big fat lie.
we need to keep track of persons like this reporter to bring them to court, because dont believe that they can keep this lie going on forever, because some of the minor perpetrators will fall down and start trying to whitewash themselves and than the whole thing collapses in "free fall"
The BBC - The British Bullshit Company. The interviewer Michael Rudin is a complicit shill. He will be pulled in for the modern version of the Nurenberg Trails. Shame on you Rubin. What a total prick you are.
@postpanic2 ahh Nurenburg u mean that place were Prince Bernhard of Netherlands and former ss officer, convicted earlier colleagues for warcrimes against humanity ?
OMG the interviewer is a fucking idiot. It's a fucking headache to listen to him speak.
All I have to say is Nano-Thermite were found in the WTC dust. Nano-Thermite is a military grade explosive. Osama does not have access to Nano-Thermite.
Love to see this done in Danish , Rudin is using his knowledge of English as a first Language to bully Harrit . He would be struck down in a Court of Law for being argumentative , belligerent and irrelevant .
rudin . NIST itself said WTC7 fires could only burn in one place for 20 minutes at a time AND that it free fell for 2.25 seconds. 108ft FREE FALL. From ONE column seat failure on floor 12, one out of 81 steel vertical columns. Office furnishings fires out on floor 12 at time of 'collapse initiation'. What a banana. 20 minutes office furnishings.No inter-floor fires. You -rudin- are arguing a 'probable'. A THEORY. The NIST report is a conflicted PROBABLE. Based on an untested computer program.
What an awful interviewer.. Such a disgrace.. How is he allowed to stay that subjective to a matter that is supposed to be explained by the interviewet? :S
I do believe that the goverment lied about the 9/11 but this journalist is by far the most informed I have heard so far . I have been suspicious about this study since it appeared and I do understand why. Believing inthe inside job theory does not mean we have to eat all arguments that confort our feelings.
@flognarde hes only interested in smearing the movement. He couldnt care less about the truth. The BBC is going to selectively edit these 2 hours of video and omit 99% of it. These journalist deserve to be publicly executed along with their bosses.
@flognarde Agreed. I think Neils Harrit handled himself very well indeed. He also had the foresight to record the interview. Lets see how the Orwellian BBC spins this one!
Here is what the pathetic mainstream media they often do when someone from "the other side" Mr Harrit to be interviewed namely throwing words into the mouths of people and nothing else..BRITISH BULLSHIT CIRCUS !!
I find Mr Harrit heroic, who could have stayed that calm and polite in front of such an aggressive journalist ?
The way our media are systematically avoiding to question the official version of 9/11 and trying to ridicule anyone expressing doubts about it, is very similar to what was practiced in the USSR.
Mr Harrit is definitely right, at the end of the interview, when he emphasizes the fact that our civilization cannot go further without the whole truth about 9/11.
We don't want this witness to talk about the Pentagon. We want him to talk about what he has studied. Why is this commentator leading him off the path of his study?
This commentator is being asked for examples, refuses to give them, and then talks about building collapsing that he cannot identity. Therefore, he is given the opportunity to spread his disinformation, without having to identify what building he is talking about. Clever!
Rudin knows he's lying, no doubt about it. He's trying to cling to every little straw he has, never once addressing the science. Niels was being too kind to this joke of a journalist. But then again, this interview constitutes beautiful solid evidence of how the MSM, in this case the BBC, is deliberately trying to obfuscate the truth about 9/11, and actually is trying to defend the official story, thereby making them conplicit in the cover up.
@Sandberg1972 If Harrit lost his temper and gave that deceitful "journalist" a harsh response to his bullying and tricking, then you can be assured that the BBC would have picked that short clip for their portrayal of Harrit in the future in order to discredit him. Harrit acted like a Media- Professional.
@TheNonConformative I didn't say anything about Niels losing his temper, I said that he was being to kind to Rudin. Niels kept cool all the way which is always the way to go, but Rudin did indeed use the fact that Niels' native language is not English against him.
What I'm saying is that Niels could've embarrassed Rudin with words if he wanted to I think & he could've done that in a very cool calm and collected manner.
That footage would never appear of course in any sort of final edit.
Rudin has an agenda - I don't want the BBC to have interviewers with agendas. There are so many times when I wish I could have stepped in and quickly ruined Rudin's point of view. I feel Richard Gage could have taught him a thing or two as the language barrier here sometimes allows Rudin to have some cheap shots and confuse Niels a bit.
Rudin has just came with pre-prepared traps for Niels.
I love the video links on this page - chemtrails, HAARP, no-planes/video fakery 9/11 conspiracy theories, some doco about gayness. Nice one youtube! You're doing the bidding for the man, just like Rudin is doing for the BBC. You're showing your true colours!
Maybe Niels would be better served to articulate in his own native language and simply stick to the known evidence of a controlled demolition and the errors and omissions by NIST.
Michael Rudin was well prepped to lead Niels away from the most damning evidence of a controlled demolition into the area of speculation.
There is a mountain of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. The BBC is a prostitute for the elite and will do anything to protect the Rothschild's worldwide criminal activity.
Brainwash Broadcasting Corruption will surely do their best to edit the interview. But, being the brilliant man he is, Professor Harrit knew to tape the REAL interview to record the side of truth. Which revealed a blatant attack by a coward of a man who was trying to coerce Neils from the FACTS into the realm of speculation to try and discredit him. SIMPLE PSYCHOLOGY! I figured that out and I didn't need a degree, similarly, you don't need a degree in physics to recognize controlled demolition.
Why does not everyone ask Micheal Rudin what happened to 200 acres of Steel decking? In a collapse this would still be in tack. They can't even find a small piece of this 200 acres. Primer paints are not the same paint used on NYC Bridges, they use Lead base paint on the Bridges its called Exterior Paint. The beams in the WTC where not painted. . What happened to the floors? In a collapse things just don't disappear? What happened to 1,000 people that just disappeared? Watch "Experts Speak Out"
This interviewer Micheal Rudin needs to get his Facts straight!!!! There was no real investigation into the Three World Trade Center building Collapse. No Subpena power. No one went under oath . And critical areas where not even mentioned in the report like the Collapse of WTC 7.!! No mention at all! Neils keep up the good work, you are in the right direction. You should only be interviewed by reporters that have a handle on this crime don't waste time with anyone else. 911 INSIDE JOB
The New York authorities are painting structures with a fire resistant paint that actually is highly reactive when heated up! LOL What a load or rubbish. No smoking in New York then! This video should be shown to all none believers, and I hope that Niel's grandchildren do end up living in a civilised world. Good work Niels!!!
I think Michael Rudin did a very good job because he just tried to make him look crazy, but failed. Not one point troubled Niel's and he walked it. You can't prove a lie!
this was clearly not a real interview. The journalist is not there to put questions and get your opinion. A real journalist should never have his truth and challenge the interviewed. This journalist was there to provocate and to contraddict you on facts... was a kind of trap... sorry...
In a interview we expected the the subject speak more than the one is asking questions. This is more kind a debate than interview, since the interviewer seams to talk more time than the subject.
Its kind strange the questions so they have no objective point. Its not seam to be a impartial interview.
This is video is a must to watch. The journalist shows the worst side of human nature. I wish the truth will would always win. Keep fighting Dr Harrit!!!!
I wonder how long Rudin practiced his schtick, and how much bonus he was paid for this. Oh, to be a professional urinalist, collecting cheques (probably tax-funded) to pee in people's ears.
Wow, if I tried to interview a subject with that level of hostility, I would be shown the door. That Dr Harrit maintained his composure throughout speaks volumes about his character and maturity.
The BBC reporter seriously needs to take some classes about what constitutes evidence. He also needs to take some science classes; his liberal arts bachelor’s degree (assuming he even finished college) clearly did not impart basic science.
This journalist is the very definition of a prestitute. He talks about 80% of the time and interrupts consistently to do his masters' bidding. Pathetic.
Thank you Niels, thank you for standing up for all of us.
We need to draw the conclusion based on the facts, and I fully concur with your line of thinking in this matter.
I also understand why a journalist needs to fight you when doing an interview like this. In favor of the truth, he must act as the opposite opinion and
there is a logic in his quest. However I find it hard to understand his aggressive style.
Now it remains to be seen how honest he portraits the facts you give him.
well done Niels. I agree with the other comments on this interview...but again...im still divided in the question:
are we seeing an interviewer that knows he is lying
or
are we seeing an interviewer badly hit by cognitive dissonans
As a thruther you might think it is pretty obvious...but if you are not a thruther...well it might just be a psychologic fenomenon...you simply cant see the obvious and your original views compromise your bias.
And Michael Rudin will probably say the same thing.
this BBC journalist is a disgrace to his own profession. . He just wants the official story to be right, no matter what. It is so sad, to listen to and it is an insult to human intelligence. Incredible how easily people. are being brainwashed. My God. We need help big time. The hard facts speaks for them self
You did great great job Neil - you put up a good fight against a character assassination attempt. At every point that the BBC states a mainstream held fact he attacks with the "official account' rather than investigate and obtain further infomation from witnessses that go against te main stream theory. The attitude of the interviewer is confirmed by what is evidence & how its presented made by a reporter paid
@ 43:20 - Game Over! ring, ring, who's there? Reality... You can now exit the ride. Its probably better to talk to a brick wall! There is nothing to gain and everything to loose from this point on.
I dunno why Niels we even argues with such ignorance... his evidence is solid that no steal frame building has ever collapsed due to fires alone. Stop talking and walk away, its a waste of time. The only reason the media interviews truthers is to ridicule them or drain their energy.
We need to all stop taking the free bait from the media pimps. The people who control the media are the same individuals and groups that did 9/11. The delivery of the message is more important than the event!
Just dealing with facts mike has at least been presented with more of the facts as well as opinions and the BBC have at least interviewed Niels .Like most of us there are lots of unanswerd questions especially around the deployment. You can see where Mike wants to get Niels to speculate and these will surely be in the edited version.
People like Ruden search out sub standard steel frame building collapses around the world and try to make the case that modern high rise steel framed buildings could collapse due to fire. They are being disingenuous with these comparisons. They are just playing with semantics by comparing dissimilar buildings.
To counter this sophistry it is necessary to add the qualifiers;
No modern steel frame high rise building has totally collapsed due to fire.
Ruden said that the Windsor Tower is one example of a high rise building collapse. In fact it is the only example of a steel frame high rise building collapse and it was only a partial, not a total collapse. Furthermore, the upper ten stories of the Windsor Tower were fully involved in flames. It looked like a torch, whereas the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had flames showing in a few places.
This example only confirms that even this substandard building took over an hour to partially collapse.
attention all demolition experts,theres no need to bring buildings down using expensive ex plosives and months of hard work.set fire to the buildings in a few scattered locations and watch them fall into their own footprint.sounds plausible doesnt it.
emmar3244 1 day ago
Michael Rudin..learn how to conduct interviews. First year journalism student is better than you. Im shocked that you haven't been fired from job because you obviously are not good at all.
bryanchance100 2 days ago
1. Det sørgeligt at se, hvor mange der har set denne video.
2. Hvis man er velsignet med bare en gnist af fornuft, så kan man se, at Dr. Niels Harrit har ret og at Michael Rudin hele tiden prøver på at forsvare den officielle konspirationsteorie.
3. Jeg ville give alt for at kunne se de 86 optagelser af den såkaldte Boing 757 der skulle have ramt den bedst sikrede bygning på denne klode.
4. Jeg håber, fra min ''inner voice'' af, at denne hændelse bliver opklaret og at retfærdigheden sejrer.
Ferdidk 5 days ago
Baaah, well, I'll, ahhh, get back to you about that.....
Please do.
Wheelcranker 5 days ago
Waiting for this journalist to interrogate in depth colin powell.
To see what will be the kind of tone he will have...
kervennic 1 week ago 2
Why is this journalist so aggressive: because the british involvement in of Irak completely disqualify BBC as a democratic counterpower. They have completely fail to opppose Tony Blair in what was the most patent forgery of all time (saddam WMD). The only way they can avoid to loose face is to show that on the other bush war, the administration was right and that there was reason to follow the official line.
But eventually everybody knows what america stands for in history.
kervennic 1 week ago
This is the same american administration that delivered the official story about Irak and 9/11.
According to medias, who have the monopole of the official truth 9/11 official vesion is accurate, Irak's i is a complete forgery made up by administration.
Irak is enough hard evidence to bring busk administration on an international trial for crime against humanity in Irak.
They'll see what they can do about afghanistan, if it is a hostile war covered up aby a fake, or an actual defensive war,
kervennic 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The blueprint for the invasion and occupation of the Middle East was outlined in a 1997 book by former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, called "Grand Chessboard". Everything done in the Middle East since 1997 is based on his book. Syria, Lebanon and Iran are the last 3 nations to attack. Is it ALL about oil? Yes. How to justify it all? USA is the tough guy, who answer to nobody. It is immoral and illegal. The WH , DOD and CIA listen to nobody. Big wars = Big money 4 War Merchants
390bullitt1968 1 week ago
I had this guy in Organic Chemestry. Niels Harrit regardless of what the truth might turn out to be (and things are not looking good for the official story), you're a darn hero in my book. Keep questioning.
Oh yes and Rudin is being an absolute ass. Harrit's patience was admirable, and acting top professional.
Fnante 1 week ago
Michael Rudin er forferdelig.
tramfilmrobin 1 week ago
Can someone plz tell me the difference between this reporter/journalist and a public prosecutor cause im kinda confused after this ?
Unplugged1977 1 week ago
lol as Niels concludes, the interwiev is done at 6:57 rest is just a weird journalist makin a complete jerk outta himself...
Unplugged1977 1 week ago
I know Mr. Rudin is doing his job but on the subject of the Pentagon he is clearly ignorant to the fact that all Dr. Neils is asking for is hard evidence!!! He's perfectly right when he says "I'm a scientist and my traing has always lead to hard facts and not secondary info from Mr. Rudin" He's perfectly right. I'm sorry guys I have to give Kudos to the Dr. who has 42 yrs in experince in the fieled. He's asking for a court of law. Full stop!!!!!!!
arsehole8 2 weeks ago
I took flying lessons 35 yrs ago and my instructor suggested I was ready to solo after 17 hours of lessons. I flew solo after about 27 hours. I have flown for 35 years and know at least 200 commercial pilots. Every single one thinks 9-11 is a gov fraud and those planes were crashed via remote control, not some half baked arab flunkies.
390bullitt1968 3 weeks ago 12
@390bullitt1968 Thank you!
More pilots around the world should stand up. Tell your collegaues about Pilots For 911 Truth, please.
Thetan1974 2 weeks ago
@Thetan1974
The 911 Truth Movement - "If you got the time, we got the lies"
ctcole77 2 weeks ago
@ctcole77 - If you call the doctor, he got the diagnose.
Thetan1974 2 weeks ago
@390bullitt1968 I'm George W. Bush and I know for a fact that the government did not plan this.
StlCardnalz 1 week ago
@StlCardnalz - Well, if you live in St. Louis take a bow. It is the highest crime infested city in America and its residents rated the meanest in America. So, why brag about living in the toilet bowl of America.
390bullitt1968 1 week ago
This reporter is quite ignorant of the FBI. there have been dozens of cases of corrupt FBI agents, lying about investigations. All of the pre 9-11 evidence that pointed to some type of large scale attack was crushed by high level corrupt FBI bosses. The FBI covered up the JFK murder and I heard that from a man who was part of the JFK investigation in Dallas after Nov 22,1963. FBI is as corrupt as CIA and DOD. That is why JFK was trying to dismantle them.
390bullitt1968 3 weeks ago
reporter is a lousy questioner. He is arguing, not asking questions. He is told to hold to a Point of View, the one his employer holds. Pathetic reporter.
390bullitt1968 3 weeks ago
i'm so glad we have abolished peer reviewed journals to determine conclusive facts and now just have to do bbc interviews. no need to present evidence to support counterclaims and give a record of how you obtained your findings in an academic response. just tell the bbc about paint that even NIST didn't report on- it has to be believed its the BBC
Broooose 3 weeks ago
with all due respect to Niels, the truth movement has hundreds of people that could destroy this interviewer. they do not want to put a native english speaker who knows the intricacies of the plot inside and out.
Broooose 3 weeks ago
"Beyond the Pale" when uttered by an Englishman means: Irish people are animals. Racist reporters in the bbc... nothing changes.
educution 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
TheLongdan9 4 weeks ago
Dr Harrit reminds me of the Trawler man, working hard in difficult conditions, dedicated to providing for mans nourishment, the interviewer reminds me of a sick gannet, scrabbling for tit bits the boat leaves in it's wake, regurgitating it's previous morsels, while continually trying to satiate it's own appetite. It seems this bbc isn’t interested in truth, only status-quo-esque illusion.
youtube.com/watch?v=nAFpGCKl3Mg
youtube.com/watch?v=jEl7WbtD2S4&feature=related
TheLongdan9 4 weeks ago
Lot's of valid points to point out, especially the points that need pointing to, not an exercise in pointless pointing but a point of fact to point at for the point of pointing out a point worth pointing at........''Mediocre hacks thrive and proliforate'' - Bill Hicks
hmm...guess the ''reporters'' favorite song youtube.com/watch?v=dndAXxqJbc0
TheLongdan9 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck off loser you know NOTHING about 911 asshole.
911studies . com/911photostudies118x.htm
WTC 6 DEMOED just b4 the 2nd plane hit.
Just deny-deny-deny bitchboy. hahahaa YOU are shit.You read ONE document & you know everything? HAHAHA Niels Harrits? ONE PERSON? fucking moronic asshole loser.
ed11561 1 month ago
if this interviewer was a college student working towards a degree he would fail the class. If a person walks into court and says the defendant was with them but DNA puts the person at the scene the witness is fully discredited. What I don't get is that the most guarded building the world gets attached and the only security video is from a gas station across the street?
bbynea18 1 month ago
Michael Rudin clearly has his own agenda here. Also, it's easy to tell a bad interviewer when they do most of the talking.
skeeveskeeve 1 month ago
A great interview video!
On the topic of the "Student Pilots", who could not even fly a Cessna training plane, but could, a Boeing 757:
Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well - FBI Director Robert Mueller acknowledged on Thursday that the identity of several of the suicide hijackers is in doubt.
Source: "Hijack 'suspects' alive and well" - BBC News.
YouTube this: BBC: al Qaeda Does Not Exist
verummossolvovos 1 month ago
bbc likes to do really childish interviews where the reporter asks stupid questions.
lee0122333 1 month ago
BBC SUCKS. ANOTHER MAINSTREAM NEWS CORPORATION.
lee0122333 1 month ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit?
How can Dick Cheney order NORAD to “stand down” if he was never in charge of NORAD?
If WTC 7 was destroyed via controlled demolition, how do you explain firefighters predicting the building's collapse 7 hours in advance?
ctcole77 1 month ago
@ctcole77 im not the expert, but its obvious government and (becoming more and more obvious) that corporate media too, are corrupt. so what corrupts them? MONEY???? what is the root cause of hte corruption? why do we 100% believe what the govt says about 9/11 when they typically lie about everything else? those were my main points. also, why wasnt bush under oath. he used to run an oil company and the vice prez used to be CEO of halliburton. do you think that may influence them in anyway?
lee0122333 1 month ago
@ctcole77 how can a bunch of terrorists get past the most protected air space in the world, including getting past f-15s? bush, gondoleeza, and i believe cheney all said "we never predicited airplanes being used as weapons for terror." REALLY???? i find that hard to believe that no one that worked for defense OR govt thought of that ever.
lee0122333 1 month ago
@lee0122333 Actually the PentaCon had exact drills on planes crashing into the pentagon building & a number of drills were held concerning the WTC being attacked & they were even painted on the cover of the report. BOTH FACTS. ctcole is a fucking lying troll & constantly LIES about everything concerning 911. May he burn in hell.
ed11561 1 month ago
@ed11561 yea i think ive seen those. look up snooki 911 and skip the first minute. its my fav video lol.
lee0122333 4 weeks ago
@lee0122333 just send me the link
ed11561 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lee0122333 Check out this entire website-quite revealing
911studies . com/911photostudies118x.htm
WTC 6 DEMOED just b4 the 2nd plane hit.
ed11561 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ctcole77 If NORAD was told to “stand down” how do you explain F-15 fighters ordered to intercept the high-jacked planes 6 minutes after WTC 1 was hit? LYING CUNT.
the planes sat on the runways for over an hour scumbag LIAR.
LOL HAHAHAHA STILL UP TO YOUR OLD LYING TRICKS DOUCHEBAG? YUP.
May u burn in hell scumbag.
ed11561 1 month ago
Forensic proof by who? This isnt CSI you idiot. Who to you think the so called "forensic experts" consult regarding the scientific anomalies of their investigations?? Scientists!! Be it through direct contact or through scientific journals and publications.
Tell me, all these so called individual experts, scientists, engineers etc. who support that 9/11 was some sort of govt conspiracy, has it not occured to them that they should put their minds together and create a simulation of the event??!
kanjarify1111 1 month ago
this journalist is such an ignorant basterd makes me wanna puke ... it is obvious that this guy has been bribed or threatened i dont know but it is so clear what the professor says and this jerk keeps on trying to put words in his mounth..... Mr. Niels your work is great keep on!! o jornalista é um imbecil...der Journalist ist ein Penner ...
marcoestevesdmc 1 month ago 3
N: "Would you say that there in no need for an investigation ?"
M: "For what crime ?"
N: "The killing of 3000+ people?"
M: "By who?" (Trying to make Niels pick a side...)
N: "I dont know - this is why we need an investigation!"
omg...
MrLudoChris 1 month ago
Just listen how many times Niels has to say "NO! - I didnt say that!" - he is constantly trying to put words in his mouth ! - This is an outrage ....
MrLudoChris 1 month ago
That just sets the standart of this interview...
MrLudoChris 1 month ago
@ 14:00 Niels is Niels is saying that building 7 couldnt have come down due to the small fires. Rudin the applies that he interpreted the pictures as there were great fires in the building. Then Niels is ABOUT to say that it wouldnt even matter if the fires were whatever great ... but the "appearently" stupid non competent interwiever says trhet is has great importance and that Niels's schientific evidence is build on a wrong interpretation of the greatness of the fires..
MrLudoChris 1 month ago
«You used the world almost»
Total retard doesn't understand basic syntax
rabidrandy 1 month ago
@rabidrandy word! phew
rabidrandy 1 month ago
Well it is obvious now Rudin has a 'dog in this fight' he is a member of 'the tribe'.
The BBC are part of the cover up, they still have not explained how/why they announced WTC 7 collapsing before it happened?
SteveEarlesView 1 month ago 2
Rudin cites Dr Richard Fruehan in order to discredit Dr Harrit, if Rudin had done any real background work he would know Fruehan's institute receives hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, hardly independent.
SteveEarlesView 1 month ago
Rudin in a insult to journalism, 1:00 no motive!!! errr we're on the verge of a 3rd war for Israel's benefit and he says no motive!!!
I think I can speak for the majority of people here when I say this interviewer is a complete arsehole, I live in the UK and this is typical BBC, I hate them so much, that is why I have never bought a TV Licence in my life and never will.
SteveEarlesView 1 month ago
@SteveEarlesView that should be at 1:00:00
SteveEarlesView 1 month ago
What a awful biast journalist Michael Rudin is. With him making programs for the BBC we have no hope of any objectivity. He just wouldn't listen and had a bullying aggressive tone throughout. Clearly a tactic to get Niels to react in a negative manner so he would have something negative to use for his edit. This seems the style they teach the BBC borg. The best bit was "well i met someone from the FBI who said they had evidence isn't that enough for you?" Very high Quality journalism!
yamaaaaar 1 month ago
Check out Wikipedia's list of Logical Fallacy, and try and find one of them that Michasel Rudin has missed!...A Trained BBC Orwellian Ministry of Truth Hit Man.
WarzSchoolchild 1 month ago
The reporter keeps asking him, "do you believe this, and do you believe that."
That is the problem here. Mainstream media has turned 9/11 into a religion. I mean to say it's all just what people are willing to believe. This is not a reasonable approach.
Where is the hard evidence, facts, and proof?
It seems as if either the US government wants conspiracy theories to developed or 9/11 was really an inside job involving a cover up.
hamberg42 1 month ago
"You're suggesting..." (putting words in Harrit's mouth, innaccurate, misrepresentation). Vomit!
5147848amp 1 month ago
This BBC guy is a gatekeeper. The number of fallacies he spouts out are too numerous to mention: "Most people believe..." (irrelevant, where's the evidence); "You don't know the last national poll..." (irrelevant); the constant appeal to secondary evidence and hearsay, e.g. "Some FBI women saw evidence" (so show me the evidence then); "Where do you think [the Pentagon] plane went?" (irrelevant, speculation).
Makes me wanna fuckin vomit.
5147848amp 1 month ago 3
Rudin, how can you sleep at night? Do you really call yourself a journalist? It's painfully obvious to any educated person who watches this video, or the other biased media you present, that you are indeed a paid propagandist. You dismiss Harrit's valid points completely and try to drill as deeply and ferociously as possible into him where you feel you may have an edge. Are you questioning (or should I say attacking) the other side as relentlessly as you did this man? Journalism = objective
Daddeeo1967 2 months ago 4
As a British citizen it saddens me that we produce idiots like this journalist. Such an obvious attempt in trying to get the professor to pick a side. That's the point though isnt it? There is no side, only facts of what actually took place on that tragic day. We know something is a miss here. We know the evidence is showing us that we have jumped to a conclusion too quickly. Its not our fault we didnt see it straight away and its definately not too late to look back!
Lets have an investigation
dankenyan 2 months ago
Michael Rudin, this is the worst possible interview imaginable. How did the BBC fall to such lows? Dr. Niels Harrit is clear, precise and incredibly patient despite your aggressive, disrespectful interview. The conclusion is obvious and sad: the BBC is now nothing more than a propaganda machine. Shame on you, Rudin.
cambridgeblue1989 2 months ago 2
@cambridgeblue1989 + This is why I won't pay a TV licence again......The once great BBC is nothing more than a mouth piece for Governmet.
Ever since the Dr David Kelly affair, when Andrew Gilligan and Greg Dyke lost their jobs, the BBC has lost it's way.
str0w4er 1 month ago 2
Worthless interviewer
berlev 2 months ago
Thanks for uploading -this is great stuff. The BBC interviewer is desperate to get Dr Harit to theorise or give his own opinion so he can brand him a "conspiracy nut"- its so obvious.
The Official story only needs to be shown that its FALSE - there is no obligation on anyone to prove anything otherwise (i.e re inside job) - in order for a criminal investigation to be valid
acidthunder1 2 months ago
Follow the money.
we need a media that is independent from corporations and politicians.
it is disgusting and I hope this journalist wake up one day.
Birgeyful 2 months ago
journalists have to much power over the public opinion, they can ignore stuff that dont fit into their agenda, and they can cherry pick comments that fit into their agenda.
He was asking Harrit about a motive for the attacks 100 times, this "journalist" obviously had an agenda before doing the interview to twist the facts into his agenda.
It is not civilized and I fear for the future, if we dont stop this kind of media manipulation.
Birgeyful 2 months ago 5
education doesn´t get you smart, it only gets you educated / James Randi
teddywinroth 2 months ago
How can anyone reject the evidence of a witness who actually SAW the Loch Ness monster? Witnesses are the very essence of a court of law. Except, of course, that the BBC “reporter” is offering hearsay evidence that would be accepted in NO US court.
CountBezukhov 2 months ago 5
Comment removed
daniekober 2 months ago
Are BBC journalist really this stupid or is this some kind of joke or satire?
Seigu007 2 months ago
Comment removed
smnaotrt 2 months ago
the carnegie mellon professors say that it isn't worth their time to review the papers which they claim are quite easy to debunk but instead chose to spend their time with this BCC propagandist
smnaotrt 2 months ago 3
Does Rudin understand that if scientists want to prove their theory, that the red/gray chips found in ground Zero dust, is a specialised paint, they can PROVE it by undertaking research and publishing their findings. These scientists don't, which should tell the nicompoop interviewer something.
At this moment of the interview, he treats Harrit like he is a complete dill, despite Harrit being a chemistry professor with decades of experience!
missopinionated1976 2 months ago 2
I don't like how the journalist treats Harrit like he has no expertise in his field. He is aggressive and negative and completely biased.
missopinionated1976 2 months ago 27
Michael Rudin, Sh*tstain on the face of humanity, defending other sh*tstains on the face of humanity.
gt40f 2 months ago 3
This is hilarious. A total hack "journalist" trying to interrogate a professor emeritus of chemistry. Like a retard trying to question a genius. Like a little leaguer trying to question a major leaguer.
gt40f 2 months ago 3
This is in no way an interview, it is an argument.
gt40f 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The BBC reporter is a fucking idiot.
btoy11 2 months ago
Comment removed
btoy11 2 months ago
Hey Rudin, do a quick search for molten iron on Youtube to hear Firefighters explain seeing rivers of molten iron running past them. You are just a mouth piece for the lamestream media. Do some research.
stankfunk75 2 months ago
Is Rudin a jew? Wouldnt be surprised at all.
TheNonConformative 2 months ago
This Rudin guy is such a TOOL!!
stankfunk75 2 months ago
"They hate our freedoms" is not a valid motive in a court of law.
joeydino60 2 months ago
Soviet style bully "journalism" at its best.
TonaramaBerlin 2 months ago
Mike RUDIN. Hrrmmmm, RUDIN......big surprise there.
avzett 2 months ago
Where are the TEM and FTIR results that they promised to do? 3 years have passed - no new info about the red/grey chips
greendreamteam11 2 months ago
Thank you very much for uploading this.
Greate respect for Niels Harrit. For the way he handled this "interview".
The betrayer betrays himself.
WTFaboutWTC7 2 months ago
Comment removed
apnsmoke 2 months ago
@ConspiracyNut there is a new group starting ,i think they were thinking of you when they started it ,based on your obvious lack of higher brain function ..."Fuckwits 4 frontal lobotomies" You look like a promising member, can you get your mum to sign you up?
MMIIXX 2 months ago
So provable evidence consists of..... the FBI told me a story, now im telling it to you, that makes it TRUE.
holy shit.....XD Well, then......Im convinced...lol
FreedumbFighter28 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos
a clear example and proof, that bbc and many more massmedia assets are part of the crime AND covering up the lie in attacking and defaming every person with a sane mind who knows that 911 is a big fat lie.
we need to keep track of persons like this reporter to bring them to court, because dont believe that they can keep this lie going on forever, because some of the minor perpetrators will fall down and start trying to whitewash themselves and than the whole thing collapses in "free fall"
horror11 2 months ago
The BBC - The British Bullshit Company. The interviewer Michael Rudin is a complicit shill. He will be pulled in for the modern version of the Nurenberg Trails. Shame on you Rubin. What a total prick you are.
postpanic2 2 months ago
@postpanic2 ahh Nurenburg u mean that place were Prince Bernhard of Netherlands and former ss officer, convicted earlier colleagues for warcrimes against humanity ?
Unplugged1977 1 week ago
OMG the interviewer is a fucking idiot. It's a fucking headache to listen to him speak.
All I have to say is Nano-Thermite were found in the WTC dust. Nano-Thermite is a military grade explosive. Osama does not have access to Nano-Thermite.
End of discussion.
JlBBERJABBERZ 2 months ago 3
bbc journalism at it's finest; pushing for conjecture and cherry-picking pitiful SUBJECTIVE arguments. unimpressed michael.
boabie 2 months ago
The BBC host accepting the passport is the crux and explains his credibility to critically think without being spoon fed with a bib on.
smnaotrt 2 months ago
the bbc are not very good at pretending to play dumb
Hexachloraphine 2 months ago
he is litrely attacking him. its a joke
Flappyization 2 months ago
ha to any real rational person all this does is highlight the ignorance of this english chap.
Flappyization 2 months ago
Love to see this done in Danish , Rudin is using his knowledge of English as a first Language to bully Harrit . He would be struck down in a Court of Law for being argumentative , belligerent and irrelevant .
MMIIXX 2 months ago
Dr. Niels Harrit you will be one of histories special people ...a Hero for the sake of truth .
The interviewer sounds moronic.
MMIIXX 2 months ago 15
rudin . NIST itself said WTC7 fires could only burn in one place for 20 minutes at a time AND that it free fell for 2.25 seconds. 108ft FREE FALL. From ONE column seat failure on floor 12, one out of 81 steel vertical columns. Office furnishings fires out on floor 12 at time of 'collapse initiation'. What a banana. 20 minutes office furnishings.No inter-floor fires. You -rudin- are arguing a 'probable'. A THEORY. The NIST report is a conflicted PROBABLE. Based on an untested computer program.
whatwaysup 2 months ago
Excellent debate, clearly won by NielsHarrit (dot) org
TruthMakesPeace 2 months ago
What an awful interviewer.. Such a disgrace.. How is he allowed to stay that subjective to a matter that is supposed to be explained by the interviewet? :S
Gottschalck2640 2 months ago
Niels my good fellow, you are wasting your time.
Now you have spent 10 years of your life trying to rouse a zombie race, all just want to walk into the valley of death sleeping.
CamillioD 2 months ago
I do believe that the goverment lied about the 9/11 but this journalist is by far the most informed I have heard so far . I have been suspicious about this study since it appeared and I do understand why. Believing inthe inside job theory does not mean we have to eat all arguments that confort our feelings.
flognarde 2 months ago
@flognarde this so called journalist wouldnt know real science from a horses ass. Hes completely clueless.
Seigu007 2 months ago in playlist Liked videos 3
@Seigu007 At least he has tried .He confronts theories. All what french journalists do is comparing truthers with antisemits and revisionists
flognarde 2 months ago
@flognarde hes only interested in smearing the movement. He couldnt care less about the truth. The BBC is going to selectively edit these 2 hours of video and omit 99% of it. These journalist deserve to be publicly executed along with their bosses.
Seigu007 2 months ago
@Seigu007 He is just a weak man, working on keeping his job. The slightest doubt and he is kicked off the mainstream media
flognarde 2 months ago
@flognarde Agreed. I think Neils Harrit handled himself very well indeed. He also had the foresight to record the interview. Lets see how the Orwellian BBC spins this one!
Seigu007 2 months ago 2
RT is where I get my news from. Not the failed BBC
Seigu007 2 months ago
@Seigu007
BBC is a fantastic media ;)
Was it perhaps not the ones advertised building 7 had collapsed 20 minutes before it actually collapsed. all documented on live TV
CamillioD 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CamillioD the only good thing about BBC is the theme song. Thats it!
Seigu007 2 months ago
Flight 93 was shot to pieces and Mr Dick Cheney has admitted it already
lillesvend666 3 months ago
Here is what the pathetic mainstream media they often do when someone from "the other side" Mr Harrit to be interviewed namely throwing words into the mouths of people and nothing else..BRITISH BULLSHIT CIRCUS !!
lillesvend666 3 months ago
I find Mr Harrit heroic, who could have stayed that calm and polite in front of such an aggressive journalist ?
The way our media are systematically avoiding to question the official version of 9/11 and trying to ridicule anyone expressing doubts about it, is very similar to what was practiced in the USSR.
Mr Harrit is definitely right, at the end of the interview, when he emphasizes the fact that our civilization cannot go further without the whole truth about 9/11.
Eksmaqina 3 months ago 3
We don't want this witness to talk about the Pentagon. We want him to talk about what he has studied. Why is this commentator leading him off the path of his study?
anastasia2657 3 months ago
This is not an interview. It is a monologue by the commentator who will not only not give examples, but even refuses to show his face.
anastasia2657 3 months ago
This commentator had absolutely no intention of interviewing this doctor. He simply wanted to be given an opportunity to talk himself. Incredible!
anastasia2657 3 months ago
This commentator is being asked for examples, refuses to give them, and then talks about building collapsing that he cannot identity. Therefore, he is given the opportunity to spread his disinformation, without having to identify what building he is talking about. Clever!
anastasia2657 3 months ago
Rudin knows he's lying, no doubt about it. He's trying to cling to every little straw he has, never once addressing the science. Niels was being too kind to this joke of a journalist. But then again, this interview constitutes beautiful solid evidence of how the MSM, in this case the BBC, is deliberately trying to obfuscate the truth about 9/11, and actually is trying to defend the official story, thereby making them conplicit in the cover up.
Sandberg1972 3 months ago
@Sandberg1972 If Harrit lost his temper and gave that deceitful "journalist" a harsh response to his bullying and tricking, then you can be assured that the BBC would have picked that short clip for their portrayal of Harrit in the future in order to discredit him. Harrit acted like a Media- Professional.
TheNonConformative 2 months ago
@TheNonConformative I didn't say anything about Niels losing his temper, I said that he was being to kind to Rudin. Niels kept cool all the way which is always the way to go, but Rudin did indeed use the fact that Niels' native language is not English against him.
What I'm saying is that Niels could've embarrassed Rudin with words if he wanted to I think & he could've done that in a very cool calm and collected manner.
That footage would never appear of course in any sort of final edit.
Sandberg1972 2 months ago
Rudin has an agenda - I don't want the BBC to have interviewers with agendas. There are so many times when I wish I could have stepped in and quickly ruined Rudin's point of view. I feel Richard Gage could have taught him a thing or two as the language barrier here sometimes allows Rudin to have some cheap shots and confuse Niels a bit.
Rudin has just came with pre-prepared traps for Niels.
Gazeboman 3 months ago
I love the video links on this page - chemtrails, HAARP, no-planes/video fakery 9/11 conspiracy theories, some doco about gayness. Nice one youtube! You're doing the bidding for the man, just like Rudin is doing for the BBC. You're showing your true colours!
seratago 3 months ago
5:15
produs13 3 months ago
Maybe Niels would be better served to articulate in his own native language and simply stick to the known evidence of a controlled demolition and the errors and omissions by NIST.
Michael Rudin was well prepped to lead Niels away from the most damning evidence of a controlled demolition into the area of speculation.
There is a mountain of evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. The BBC is a prostitute for the elite and will do anything to protect the Rothschild's worldwide criminal activity.
getbo 3 months ago
Comment removed
DannyFischarge 3 months ago
If this guy wants a motive he should read a book like Crossing The Rubicon.
coughdrop47 3 months ago
Brainwash Broadcasting Corruption will surely do their best to edit the interview. But, being the brilliant man he is, Professor Harrit knew to tape the REAL interview to record the side of truth. Which revealed a blatant attack by a coward of a man who was trying to coerce Neils from the FACTS into the realm of speculation to try and discredit him. SIMPLE PSYCHOLOGY! I figured that out and I didn't need a degree, similarly, you don't need a degree in physics to recognize controlled demolition.
FjukTheFed 3 months ago 2
the best moment: 42:20
dickobrazz01 3 months ago 2
@dickobrazz01 lol you so right
ignilc 2 months ago
Professor Harrit,
You were too kind to this lying, ignoramus, propagandist who masquerades as a journalist.
Didn't George Orwell base his Ministry of Truth in 1984 on the BBC?
tanabear911 3 months ago 2
it's one thing to grill somebody with questions, it's quite another to be a disrespectful prick. he got put in his place though...what an asshole...
brouseinthehouse 3 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Why are they calling this knucklehead a professor? They could have just stopped the interview at the beginning, where he is saying : i don't know....
Newwaver2007 3 months ago
Why does not everyone ask Micheal Rudin what happened to 200 acres of Steel decking? In a collapse this would still be in tack. They can't even find a small piece of this 200 acres. Primer paints are not the same paint used on NYC Bridges, they use Lead base paint on the Bridges its called Exterior Paint. The beams in the WTC where not painted. . What happened to the floors? In a collapse things just don't disappear? What happened to 1,000 people that just disappeared? Watch "Experts Speak Out"
EASTSIDERMAN 3 months ago
This interviewer Micheal Rudin needs to get his Facts straight!!!! There was no real investigation into the Three World Trade Center building Collapse. No Subpena power. No one went under oath . And critical areas where not even mentioned in the report like the Collapse of WTC 7.!! No mention at all! Neils keep up the good work, you are in the right direction. You should only be interviewed by reporters that have a handle on this crime don't waste time with anyone else. 911 INSIDE JOB
EASTSIDERMAN 3 months ago 2
the BBC reporter is so clueless.. How do these people get a job in journalism..
cwehden 4 months ago 11
@cwehden
Who says he has a job in journalism?
tanabear911 3 months ago
The New York authorities are painting structures with a fire resistant paint that actually is highly reactive when heated up! LOL What a load or rubbish. No smoking in New York then! This video should be shown to all none believers, and I hope that Niel's grandchildren do end up living in a civilised world. Good work Niels!!!
I think Michael Rudin did a very good job because he just tried to make him look crazy, but failed. Not one point troubled Niel's and he walked it. You can't prove a lie!
resonantaudiotv 4 months ago 5
Congratulations Professor Harrit. Well done!
In the bigger picture, this interview could be a defining moment...
uprc2005 4 months ago 31
@uprc2005 Yes defining. Score 9-11 Truth 1001, Complicit Shills 1
getbo 3 months ago
this was clearly not a real interview. The journalist is not there to put questions and get your opinion. A real journalist should never have his truth and challenge the interviewed. This journalist was there to provocate and to contraddict you on facts... was a kind of trap... sorry...
chicco80 4 months ago 4
In a interview we expected the the subject speak more than the one is asking questions. This is more kind a debate than interview, since the interviewer seams to talk more time than the subject.
Its kind strange the questions so they have no objective point. Its not seam to be a impartial interview.
DeInProVisu 4 months ago 4
This is video is a must to watch. The journalist shows the worst side of human nature. I wish the truth will would always win. Keep fighting Dr Harrit!!!!
BTinHD 4 months ago 4
I wonder how long Rudin practiced his schtick, and how much bonus he was paid for this. Oh, to be a professional urinalist, collecting cheques (probably tax-funded) to pee in people's ears.
mcdebitto 4 months ago 4
Wow, if I tried to interview a subject with that level of hostility, I would be shown the door. That Dr Harrit maintained his composure throughout speaks volumes about his character and maturity.
The BBC reporter seriously needs to take some classes about what constitutes evidence. He also needs to take some science classes; his liberal arts bachelor’s degree (assuming he even finished college) clearly did not impart basic science.
radyananda 4 months ago 8
This journalist is the very definition of a prestitute. He talks about 80% of the time and interrupts consistently to do his masters' bidding. Pathetic.
rainhawk101 4 months ago 4
Thank you Niels, thank you for standing up for all of us.
We need to draw the conclusion based on the facts, and I fully concur with your line of thinking in this matter.
I also understand why a journalist needs to fight you when doing an interview like this. In favor of the truth, he must act as the opposite opinion and
there is a logic in his quest. However I find it hard to understand his aggressive style.
Now it remains to be seen how honest he portraits the facts you give him.
miavmiavmiavmiav 4 months ago 3
well done Niels. I agree with the other comments on this interview...but again...im still divided in the question:
are we seeing an interviewer that knows he is lying
or
are we seeing an interviewer badly hit by cognitive dissonans
As a thruther you might think it is pretty obvious...but if you are not a thruther...well it might just be a psychologic fenomenon...you simply cant see the obvious and your original views compromise your bias.
And Michael Rudin will probably say the same thing.
hoejgard 4 months ago
this BBC journalist is a disgrace to his own profession. . He just wants the official story to be right, no matter what. It is so sad, to listen to and it is an insult to human intelligence. Incredible how easily people. are being brainwashed. My God. We need help big time. The hard facts speaks for them self
zazahara 4 months ago 4
You did great great job Neil - you put up a good fight against a character assassination attempt. At every point that the BBC states a mainstream held fact he attacks with the "official account' rather than investigate and obtain further infomation from witnessses that go against te main stream theory. The attitude of the interviewer is confirmed by what is evidence & how its presented made by a reporter paid
zwarst 4 months ago
This should be called "BBC attacks Dr. Niels Harrit". I do belive Niels Harrit sleeps a lot better than Michael Rudin
inzidejob 5 months ago 31
why would anybody be against a world class forensic investigation ? everybody knows we haven't seen one yet.
MMIIXX 5 months ago 4
@ 43:20 - Game Over! ring, ring, who's there? Reality... You can now exit the ride. Its probably better to talk to a brick wall! There is nothing to gain and everything to loose from this point on.
phantomorpheus 5 months ago
@ 19:20 - I think Niels forgot who he was talking to for a second or two.... (obviously the mainstream media doesn't cover this...)
phantomorpheus 5 months ago
I dunno why Niels we even argues with such ignorance... his evidence is solid that no steal frame building has ever collapsed due to fires alone. Stop talking and walk away, its a waste of time. The only reason the media interviews truthers is to ridicule them or drain their energy.
We need to all stop taking the free bait from the media pimps. The people who control the media are the same individuals and groups that did 9/11. The delivery of the message is more important than the event!
phantomorpheus 5 months ago
Just dealing with facts mike has at least been presented with more of the facts as well as opinions and the BBC have at least interviewed Niels .Like most of us there are lots of unanswerd questions especially around the deployment. You can see where Mike wants to get Niels to speculate and these will surely be in the edited version.
fish5133 5 months ago
Fire fighters molten steel eyewitnesses Youtube molten steel
youtube.com/watch?v=cCdRA09pztM
fish5133 5 months ago
Shame on you , BBC! This interview shows clearly that you are trying to protect the criminals, who are behind 9/11.
kame1958 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
People like Ruden search out sub standard steel frame building collapses around the world and try to make the case that modern high rise steel framed buildings could collapse due to fire. They are being disingenuous with these comparisons. They are just playing with semantics by comparing dissimilar buildings.
To counter this sophistry it is necessary to add the qualifiers;
No modern steel frame high rise building has totally collapsed due to fire.
chrissarns 5 months ago
Ruden said that the Windsor Tower is one example of a high rise building collapse. In fact it is the only example of a steel frame high rise building collapse and it was only a partial, not a total collapse. Furthermore, the upper ten stories of the Windsor Tower were fully involved in flames. It looked like a torch, whereas the Twin Towers and WTC 7 had flames showing in a few places.
This example only confirms that even this substandard building took over an hour to partially collapse.
chrissarns 5 months ago
Comment removed
chrissarns 5 months ago
Comment removed
chrissarns 5 months ago