Out of all the videos on this channel, YouTube won't let me watch this one all the way through. It keeps "buffering" and finishes 0:07 seconds into it. So strange.
9/11 was in no way an act of terrorism from any foreign country or terrorist organization. It was an assualt from the U.S. Government on it's own people to start enforcing laws like the Patriot Act to start stripping our rights.
On the FOX footage, you can see the nose of the plane coming out of the building, then blackout, and after that, the nose of the plane is gone. Proof that all 3 tv channels were controled from the same place and the blackout is there to hide the nose of the plane coming out of the building, which proves that in my opinion it was video editing. But thanks to human reaction, they couldnt get the blackout in time to hide the nose error. There were no planes, it's video editing, don't reply please.
I think they edited out the part where the Depleted Uranium penatrator "fired" into the building. It can be seen "flashing" before hitting the building in other videos.
Hey Guys, remember the guy on the street in the interview who said, "plane, what plane, it was a missle we saw", maybe both towers were hit with a cruise missle and they were trying to cover it up.
I agree there was airplanes. What I was referring to was the bright flash of light underneath the planes that detonated before the nose of the plane hit the towers. Did u see the interview, w/ the depleted uranium expert who believed the bright white hot projectile that went through tower 2 and came out the other side had all the specific characteristics of a depleted uranium penatrator necessary to "rip a whole" in the tower before the planes hit. w/o it the planes would have "bounced" off
very interesting. alot of people have highlighted unsusal extra pieces on the bottom of at least one of the planes. If the planes were done digitally why would you draw in extra bits? good post Tomm.
I take it you aligned on impact as FOX and CNN were several seconds off from each other in real time and I am not aware of a real time clock for the naudet.
I aligned them visually. I used the nose-out to sync Naudet to Chopper 5, they must be accurate to about 1 frame. CNN was a little bit more of a guess, matching the plane position. It could be off by maybe 1 or 2 frames.
The reason I raised it is that I have found that the networks had the wtc2 event at different times - real and their own on-screen clocks.
And, of course, what I call the timing chopper (most likely the chopper that captured the wtc2 event from the south) and the "extra plane" - the plane heading south at that time.
I did not know what was attendant to the "stand down order"... but, "yes", I would've assumed there was an envelope of protection surrounding both the Penatgon & White House
Th Doppler feeding into the missle batteries is interesting
The one item for me Kahl, Was DC, Its independant of Norad for domestic puposes in its self defence from lets say a garage launched projectile. DC has Multiple Batterys of Quick Track Dopler focused to encompase specified areas all independant that also feeds into Vulcan Batterys Of 3plAAA plus G2A rapid missles up to Patriot Missles. And then theres Still the Man on the Roof with Stinger Missles. Cheny in the Bunker even Stood down this counter measure so its so inside you cant ignore the facts
what im confused about is the Naudet 1st WTC plane strike was an amateur video shot Live the morning on 911. I dont understand precisely how that could have been fake in any way ?
collin, ok thanks i wasnt aware of that. I do believe that 911 was an inside Job on Many Levels, and Like many Americans , Im trying to understand all this and Piece it together. Now correct me if im wrong, but you are claiming that the Naudet 1st plane was totally fake and a photoshopped image and that NO plane ever hit in that video.
If so, than that fireman and those inspectors on the street in the video would have to be paid off to keep silent about all this ?
Hey , whats your Opinion on the famous Live Amatuer Video shot on 911 of the Towers by BOB AND BRI
Its a very high quality , clear , close up video of the Towers as this woman was directly across from them, filming the entire event with her home video recorder.
For the Entire 30 minute video, there are NO skips or 'gaps' of any kind, all continuous film, EXCEPT for the obvious 2 second edit of precisely when the supposed 2nd plane hit !
I agree, how can the tape have been innocently or just 'coincidentally' stopped at some time, but then resumed the VERY second the explosion happened but missing the actual object that caused the explosion by a MILI SECOND .
Especially since the entire 26 min video has no Visible edits or splices or skips, except for this one single 1 second Frame.
totally absurd. Whats also to note is just after the explosion, the Woman filming says " it was a Military Plane"
Fair enough, but its clear the tape was definitely edited 2 seconds before the 2nd tower Explosion.
Whats to keep in Mind also is the AUDIO . A man who just enters in the conversation about 1 minute after the 2nd explosion, and appears to have just entered the Room asks 'was it a Plane ? '
The woman filming everything then says to him " yes hunny i have it right on here ill show you "
Then obviously the Thousand dollar question is ,,,,,, Who removed it from the tape ?
Do we have any verification of any kind that the FBI or NYPD had the Bob and Bri video in their possession before it was publicly released ?
If the theory is that it could have been the Govt who edited out that frame, than the obvious question is why would they leave in her voice saying "it was a Military Plane"
Also, about 1 minute or so after the explosion, shes telling a man on the tape verbally who asks about the plane "i'll show it to you on Here "
further proof of the corporate conspiracy.. september clues show these events.. america was in on these attacks and the blackouts only confirm the conspiracy.
Out of all the videos on this channel, YouTube won't let me watch this one all the way through. It keeps "buffering" and finishes 0:07 seconds into it. So strange.
smorriskc 3 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
9/11 was in no way an act of terrorism from any foreign country or terrorist organization. It was an assualt from the U.S. Government on it's own people to start enforcing laws like the Patriot Act to start stripping our rights.
N3oNPREDATOR69 4 weeks ago
great video!
obviously trying to hide something.
48mmwatch 4 months ago
On the FOX footage, you can see the nose of the plane coming out of the building, then blackout, and after that, the nose of the plane is gone. Proof that all 3 tv channels were controled from the same place and the blackout is there to hide the nose of the plane coming out of the building, which proves that in my opinion it was video editing. But thanks to human reaction, they couldnt get the blackout in time to hide the nose error. There were no planes, it's video editing, don't reply please.
Fugitive292 5 months ago
No plane what so ever in the naudet footage, then BOOM flames coming out of the structure.
What a bad joke on the American public!
Sheet aluminum can not shear structural steel. Never seen it, and you never will.
cheerdiver 5 months ago
How could the antenna be interrupted if the North tower was the one with the antenna and in the video the South tower is being hit hahahahahah.
edbelfor2 1 year ago
DUH! When the building was hit the transponder at the top of the towers was interrupted!
pkmccluskey3 2 years ago
I think they edited out the part where the Depleted Uranium penatrator "fired" into the building. It can be seen "flashing" before hitting the building in other videos.
TommScholz 2 years ago
Hey Guys, remember the guy on the street in the interview who said, "plane, what plane, it was a missle we saw", maybe both towers were hit with a cruise missle and they were trying to cover it up.
TommScholz 2 years ago
Missiles travel too fast. I'm fairly sure planes were involved either way it was an inside job
Hornfinger 2 years ago
I agree there was airplanes. What I was referring to was the bright flash of light underneath the planes that detonated before the nose of the plane hit the towers. Did u see the interview, w/ the depleted uranium expert who believed the bright white hot projectile that went through tower 2 and came out the other side had all the specific characteristics of a depleted uranium penatrator necessary to "rip a whole" in the tower before the planes hit. w/o it the planes would have "bounced" off
TommScholz 2 years ago
very interesting. alot of people have highlighted unsusal extra pieces on the bottom of at least one of the planes. If the planes were done digitally why would you draw in extra bits? good post Tomm.
Hornfinger 2 years ago
What could have happened during that 1 second that was not meant to be shown? Or was it simply a case of re-synching all the post-crash footage?
OverdueDiligence 2 years ago
does this mean that all the feeds were hijacked? interesting.
photofu 3 years ago
Good job. Why hasn't this been done before?
911footage 3 years ago
I don't know, maybe it has. I haven't seen it.
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
yay! anuther "no plane, black out 911 utube vid"...and with no audio!...yay!
BizzyBumpyWilson 3 years ago
great vid, never knew this until now
rcmoonpie1967 3 years ago
Hoodwinked!
RexNunc 3 years ago
CollinAlexander
Nice analysis, as usual.
I take it you aligned on impact as FOX and CNN were several seconds off from each other in real time and I am not aware of a real time clock for the naudet.
Do you have a source for the high def CNN 8:48?
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I aligned them visually. I used the nose-out to sync Naudet to Chopper 5, they must be accurate to about 1 frame. CNN was a little bit more of a guess, matching the plane position. It could be off by maybe 1 or 2 frames.
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
Many thanks
The reason I raised it is that I have found that the networks had the wtc2 event at different times - real and their own on-screen clocks.
And, of course, what I call the timing chopper (most likely the chopper that captured the wtc2 event from the south) and the "extra plane" - the plane heading south at that time.
CNN911Fakes 3 years ago
I did not know what was attendant to the "stand down order"... but, "yes", I would've assumed there was an envelope of protection surrounding both the Penatgon & White House
Th Doppler feeding into the missle batteries is interesting
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
Excellent comparative analysis, Colin
kahlmyishmael 3 years ago
The one item for me Kahl, Was DC, Its independant of Norad for domestic puposes in its self defence from lets say a garage launched projectile. DC has Multiple Batterys of Quick Track Dopler focused to encompase specified areas all independant that also feeds into Vulcan Batterys Of 3plAAA plus G2A rapid missles up to Patriot Missles. And then theres Still the Man on the Roof with Stinger Missles. Cheny in the Bunker even Stood down this counter measure so its so inside you cant ignore the facts
cycimian 3 years ago
It was a miracle from God. God synchronized all the cuts that day.
125nl84jpeg 3 years ago
-- It was a miracle from God. God synchronized all the cuts that day.
AND he helped us find that damned hijackers passport.
AND he stopped anyone from getting ear damage when the lobby windows blew out.
AND he flung that lamp post into the cab perfectly without scratching the hood and barely ripping the upholstery.
AND he helped all those people make calls from their cellphones.
AND he made sure Bush would forget about the 'Bin Laden determined to attack' report (maybe not such a miracle)
mindprism 3 years ago
what is the source of your Naudet video?
Aanthanur 3 years ago
Filmmakers Commemorative Edition
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
The naudet video on the DVD has no blackout, it is cut, but no blackout, who inserted that blackout?
Aanthanur 3 years ago
I clearly answer that question in the info box. Please have a look.
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
oops sorry, didnt see that.
Aanthanur 3 years ago
what about the video of the Naudet 1st WTC hit ?
jblaz1024 3 years ago
What about it?
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
what im confused about is the Naudet 1st WTC plane strike was an amateur video shot Live the morning on 911. I dont understand precisely how that could have been fake in any way ?
if so exact how did they fake that plane ?
jblaz1024 3 years ago
Naudet 1 was not shown until after midnight on 9/11.
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
collin, ok thanks i wasnt aware of that. I do believe that 911 was an inside Job on Many Levels, and Like many Americans , Im trying to understand all this and Piece it together. Now correct me if im wrong, but you are claiming that the Naudet 1st plane was totally fake and a photoshopped image and that NO plane ever hit in that video.
If so, than that fireman and those inspectors on the street in the video would have to be paid off to keep silent about all this ?
jblaz1024 3 years ago
Hey , whats your Opinion on the famous Live Amatuer Video shot on 911 of the Towers by BOB AND BRI
Its a very high quality , clear , close up video of the Towers as this woman was directly across from them, filming the entire event with her home video recorder.
For the Entire 30 minute video, there are NO skips or 'gaps' of any kind, all continuous film, EXCEPT for the obvious 2 second edit of precisely when the supposed 2nd plane hit !
id luv to get your take on this
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
I think the edit in Bob and Bri is highly suspicious, and have said so many times before.
What are the odds?
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
I agree, how can the tape have been innocently or just 'coincidentally' stopped at some time, but then resumed the VERY second the explosion happened but missing the actual object that caused the explosion by a MILI SECOND .
Especially since the entire 26 min video has no Visible edits or splices or skips, except for this one single 1 second Frame.
totally absurd. Whats also to note is just after the explosion, the Woman filming says " it was a Military Plane"
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
There are a few other edits in Bob and Bri. We don't see the very beginning of the North Tower demolition either.
CollinAlexander 3 years ago
Fair enough, but its clear the tape was definitely edited 2 seconds before the 2nd tower Explosion.
Whats to keep in Mind also is the AUDIO . A man who just enters in the conversation about 1 minute after the 2nd explosion, and appears to have just entered the Room asks 'was it a Plane ? '
The woman filming everything then says to him " yes hunny i have it right on here ill show you "
Then obviously the Thousand dollar question is ,,,,,, Who removed it from the tape ?
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Do we have any verification of any kind that the FBI or NYPD had the Bob and Bri video in their possession before it was publicly released ?
If the theory is that it could have been the Govt who edited out that frame, than the obvious question is why would they leave in her voice saying "it was a Military Plane"
Also, about 1 minute or so after the explosion, shes telling a man on the tape verbally who asks about the plane "i'll show it to you on Here "
TheGreat911HOAX 3 years ago
Nice job man, I posted a couple of ideas at the top of the thread
TommScholz 2 years ago
further proof of the corporate conspiracy.. september clues show these events.. america was in on these attacks and the blackouts only confirm the conspiracy.
navtel 3 years ago