Quite good Soviet technologies developed in 1960, in Russia now also exist helicopters capable to transport greater(big) cargoes-planes, helicopters, cars.....
just like a V22 accept its bigger and it only has a fix landing gear, but the rotor doesn't tilt forward and fly fast, maybee the future model might have it.
Germans are not racists.The German state persecutes German people in the same way as foreigners.Torture and murder are seen as normal tools of the state because Germans get accustomed to this since beeing young children.So no German would ever complain.In no other country torture and murder by the state is accepted.Consequently foreigners being persecuted in Germany are complaining.This gives the completely false picture of Germans being racist.They are not.They are only NAZIs.See my homepage.
Truckincold. I'm totally agree with you, just enjoy the human achieves in aeronautical industry but don't forget the spaniard engineer Juan de la Cierva and his Autogiro ,the beginning of the helicopter.I know ..that was long time ago but the spaniards we have too a important part in the aeronautical history of the humanity ;)
Wow, thats pretty cool. I don't really see a practical use for it but it is impressive nonetheless. My hunch is this came out of the cold war attitude of mine is bigger than yours and I am going to prove it. Thx for posting this. I love unique and rare aircraft.
@shananagans5 Sure you would see the practical use of it if it was only American, wouldn't you? Nevertheless peaceful comment. Many thanks for that. BTW: What is the practical use of the capability to vertically lift uge payloads without any runway? Difficult to understand, I see.
@TheBluewaterII It seems to me that something capable of heavy lift but a bit smaller would be more practical. Less space needed to land, easier to work on, lower maintenance costs less expensive to replace. In times when as much as possible needs to be moved this would shine but more units of something a bit smaller would be better suited for more missions. An army will need to move 3 or 4 trucks far more often than they need to relocate the entire army. A smaller unit would be used more often
@TheBluewaterII Don't get me wrong, it's a brilliant design but why use a bus that seats 90 people when you usually only need to move 50 people. On those rare occasions you do need to move 90 people, just use 2 buses. See what I am saying?
@shananagans5 Thanks again, this time for the lesson. :-) I only reflected your statement you won't see ANY use of the thing. In the sixtees the Russians believed they easily could exploit their Siberian ressources by giant technological means. The Mi-12 (W-40 so far) was designed to transport a whole oil digging unit, equipment and crew, at once. Bigger is cheaper is better, the philosophy was. Unfortunately, economists as well as technicians proved it wrong. And only some FIA-records remained.
@IsaacD39 Well aren't you just the coolest guy around? Just stating my opinion, didn't ask for that remark. I am a big aviation person, I just don't happen to study wierd ass Soviet aircraft. Thanks and have a nice day
@NoPancakeMixxx you said "not even a helicopter"... thats not an opinion, thats stating it like its fact. not just "wierd ass soviet aircraft" have 2 rotors like this... the American Chinook has 2.
@NoPancakeMixxx no, no. i read that. but just because something has two propellers does not mean its "not even a helicopter". you said most you have seen have 1 central rotor, and that you dont study weird ass soviet craft... so i was just stating that not all 2-rotor craft are soviet. so, are you saying that two-rotor soviet helicopters are not helicopters? because when you boil it down, thats basically what it reads... and therefore, what i think you meant does not = what you wrote.
I always wonder why these posts turn into fights over who builds better aircraft....why cant we just appreciate technical achievements of each others aviation industries.. Russians built some cool stuff.. Americans have built some cool stuff,as have the Canadians (avro arrow) British Italians Germans and French.. and we cant forget the Swedes... Draken and Viggen... waay ahead of thier times.... just chill and enjoy the aircraft....
@theangrypersian That would be a good suggestion...if there actually a god(dess) which there is not and if there were I would still have more balls and a bigger cock. My dog could also eat their dog.
@Truckincold You are absolutely right. Yet, I think it's a funny coincidence that for building large or extremely large helicopters you need a russian, even if he is an emigrated one (Sikorsky).
@thatman64 blacks are good at something? wow.. first i hear lol im kidding, oh thot asians were good at kicking ass and jews at starting wars.. oooooo yeah i went there lol haha
@aizad3755 Probably - the concept looks similar although the Rotodyne's rotor was unpowered, basically it was a massive autogyro built to overcome the need for STOL operations in those days. It never entered production. I'm guessing this beauty has powered rotors - would have loved to have seen one flying..... sigh!!!
@leralon I'd rather have a V-22, this thing is just a commercial plane with some home made wings and helicopter engines. Probably didn't take long to throw together and lasted not much longer.
@mudslinger1984 Theres about 20 years of difference so hard to compare. Also V-22 can carry about 3 big cars (weight, not size), while this puppy can carry a V-22 loaded with 3 big cars and some more ;)
And we(Americans) thought we were so clever with the MV-22 of generally the same concept....and look how long that took us to make, the russians had it figured out 50 years ago!
@transdrole Not really. It fuel consumption is comparable to consumption of a single MiG-21 old USSR jet fighter, and maintenance isn't really different from light jet airplane. The problem was it's purpose: it was meant to transport heavy ballistic missiles parts to dislocations without solid roads for land transporting, let alone airplanes usage. At certain point, lighter and more efficient missiles were built, and this helicopter became no longer needed.
Communists make the biggest shit in the world, you gotta give them that. (Please exclude Vietnam, Cuba, and North Korea from that statement) Even the Ukraine made the biggest fuck up in Nuklear power history.
Haha a French broadcast of a Soviet helicopter. Why does Russia always try to build the biggest pile of junk? Wow it can lift anything, but only lasts 5 years haha.
етот разработчик отдал многое етому вертолёту он был оченнь добр к своим помошникам и иногие его щитали недееспособным тока из за етого и и умер так и неувидев очереди тысячи людей к своему вертолёту и амереканцы кккккогда приехали на фронцузкую выстовку они думали что равных и близа небудет но когда они увидели етт вертолёт они остолбинелили я много могу раскозать про етот вертолёт и и скажу вертолёт ето легенда можно сказать
It's called Homer because NATO labels all Russian helicopters with simple names that start with H. I suppose Homer was next on the list.
This machine did everything that it was designed to do, but after the two prototypes were built, the Strategic Rocket Forces decided that they could make do with smaller and cheaper helicopters like the Mi-6 Hook.
Да! - это не ослов ебать по пригоркам!
loki4145 2 weeks ago
lol "Homer" !
wackokicker 2 weeks ago
Its like a plane with rotors!
roju0229 4 weeks ago
The USA looked at it and said: I know how to make it less retarded.
Enter the Osprey.
F3Zero1 1 month ago
@F3Zero1 But can the Osprey carry two trucks?
justcocacola 3 weeks ago
@F3Zero1 You forgot to mention WHY this helicopter is retarded.....??
Tillerman56 2 weeks ago
That's a fucking airplane.
xevosinx 1 month ago
Это русское дерьмо сейчас гниет где то на складе старого аэродерьма!!
VolnoeSerdce 1 month ago
@VolnoeSerdce Руские загнули раком ахмада кадырова, Кавказоны могут только торгавать сухофруктами и анашой.
silushkadebilnaya 1 month ago
@silushkadebilnaya Да нет ваня помоему это ваша раша загнулась раком и мы имеем ее как хотим)))
VolnoeSerdce 1 month ago
That thing is insane
Nautical1994 1 month ago
Incredible! Imagine the hydraulic forces needed to turn such a large craft as well as the gyroscopic forces!
animationchambers 1 month ago
damn that sucker has some mass
theacropilot 1 month ago
What. The. !@#$. Just call it a airplane. lol
ThatCoolCommenter 1 month ago
It's "RUSSIAN". :))
cuebone69 2 months ago
How many hours maintenance per hour of flight?
SapperK9 2 months ago
russians are fukin stupid
dillonislolz 2 months ago
@dillonislolz
You desperately lack creativity, better finish school, then try again.
vtkrey 1 month ago
Quite good Soviet technologies developed in 1960, in Russia now also exist helicopters capable to transport greater(big) cargoes-planes, helicopters, cars.....
Vanyaaynav 2 months ago
sorry, but this helicopter not russian. This Soviet machine ~_~
krokhmal96 2 months ago
I tot Homer was yellow=)
kittseong 3 months ago
@kittseong good one!! love it and homer is yellow
chechita14 2 months ago
what a heap!!!!
kpm2083 4 months ago
just like a V22 accept its bigger and it only has a fix landing gear, but the rotor doesn't tilt forward and fly fast, maybee the future model might have it.
sideslide23 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Germans are not racists.The German state persecutes German people in the same way as foreigners.Torture and murder are seen as normal tools of the state because Germans get accustomed to this since beeing young children.So no German would ever complain.In no other country torture and murder by the state is accepted.Consequently foreigners being persecuted in Germany are complaining.This gives the completely false picture of Germans being racist.They are not.They are only NAZIs.See my homepage.
wwwtotalitaerde 5 months ago
triangles, triangles, triangles.
oxsuperjackxo 5 months ago
"why is it so big"... IT IS RUSSIAN
worldchamps271 5 months ago 13
Wow.....just wow
nakedcelt 5 months ago
You know what we should do? Get one of these, and outfit it to fight fires, then permanently station it in New York City.
EthanNin0 5 months ago
You know what we should do? Get one of these, and outfit it to fight fires, then permanently station it in New York City.
EthanNin0 5 months ago
amazing made in rusia
DevilCondori 5 months ago
SO CHEAP ITS PART OF AN AIRPLANE JUST HAVING ROTORS OF A HELICOPTER
Germancly 5 months ago
@Germancly Really?
MYKEDANGER 5 months ago
does he say super pussy at 0:35? 0.o
Mar10nii 5 months ago 15
@Mar10nii he says piusE (AE) the E has a appostrophe above the E.
arshdeep125 5 months ago
@Mar10nii
Not when I am drinking my tea. I blarted all over the place.
G777GUN 3 weeks ago
@falomada this is different because these can benifit all where as fans and such just benifit 1 group
IsaacD39 5 months ago
This thing has to have some power.
packers4ever80 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Truckincold. I'm totally agree with you, just enjoy the human achieves in aeronautical industry but don't forget the spaniard engineer Juan de la Cierva and his Autogiro ,the beginning of the helicopter.I know ..that was long time ago but the spaniards we have too a important part in the aeronautical history of the humanity ;)
PIRINEOS12 6 months ago
Comment removed
PIRINEOS12 6 months ago
Wow, thats pretty cool. I don't really see a practical use for it but it is impressive nonetheless. My hunch is this came out of the cold war attitude of mine is bigger than yours and I am going to prove it. Thx for posting this. I love unique and rare aircraft.
shananagans5 6 months ago
@shananagans5 Sure you would see the practical use of it if it was only American, wouldn't you? Nevertheless peaceful comment. Many thanks for that. BTW: What is the practical use of the capability to vertically lift uge payloads without any runway? Difficult to understand, I see.
TheBluewaterII 6 months ago
@TheBluewaterII It seems to me that something capable of heavy lift but a bit smaller would be more practical. Less space needed to land, easier to work on, lower maintenance costs less expensive to replace. In times when as much as possible needs to be moved this would shine but more units of something a bit smaller would be better suited for more missions. An army will need to move 3 or 4 trucks far more often than they need to relocate the entire army. A smaller unit would be used more often
shananagans5 6 months ago
@TheBluewaterII Don't get me wrong, it's a brilliant design but why use a bus that seats 90 people when you usually only need to move 50 people. On those rare occasions you do need to move 90 people, just use 2 buses. See what I am saying?
shananagans5 6 months ago
@shananagans5 Thanks again, this time for the lesson. :-) I only reflected your statement you won't see ANY use of the thing. In the sixtees the Russians believed they easily could exploit their Siberian ressources by giant technological means. The Mi-12 (W-40 so far) was designed to transport a whole oil digging unit, equipment and crew, at once. Bigger is cheaper is better, the philosophy was. Unfortunately, economists as well as technicians proved it wrong. And only some FIA-records remained.
TheBluewaterII 6 months ago
they should make a load of new ones, would sell well
mattd28 6 months ago
Not even a helicopter. Most of them that i've seen have one central rotor
NoPancakeMixxx 6 months ago
@NoPancakeMixxx that is a helicopter. It can have as many roters as it wants. I guess your not the big aviation person but thats ok
IsaacD39 5 months ago
@IsaacD39 Well aren't you just the coolest guy around? Just stating my opinion, didn't ask for that remark. I am a big aviation person, I just don't happen to study wierd ass Soviet aircraft. Thanks and have a nice day
NoPancakeMixxx 5 months ago
@NoPancakeMixxx you said "not even a helicopter"... thats not an opinion, thats stating it like its fact. not just "wierd ass soviet aircraft" have 2 rotors like this... the American Chinook has 2.
KottonmouthSoldiers 5 months ago
@KottonmouthSoldiers Correction. I said MOST of them I've seen have only one. Wow nobody reads anything anymore
NoPancakeMixxx 5 months ago
@NoPancakeMixxx no, no. i read that. but just because something has two propellers does not mean its "not even a helicopter". you said most you have seen have 1 central rotor, and that you dont study weird ass soviet craft... so i was just stating that not all 2-rotor craft are soviet. so, are you saying that two-rotor soviet helicopters are not helicopters? because when you boil it down, thats basically what it reads... and therefore, what i think you meant does not = what you wrote.
KottonmouthSoldiers 5 months ago
Its hard jerking off to this stuff.
jacobg1777 6 months ago
They got time to make this junk?
SoCalDualSport 6 months ago
french language sound great
DerSturmerSS 6 months ago
"that's a big helicopter"
"it's russian eh!"
aussieblackhawk123 7 months ago
It's not as big as the Hotelicopter!
scottelly2 7 months ago
cool whoever made it, super
granskare 7 months ago
Russians sure like big aircraft
Bulletodahead 7 months ago
You know how bad it would suck if one of these crashed? Especially if it was carrying a colony of baby seals D=
nathaniel1995able 7 months ago
looks like a v22 osprey and a boeing had a strange mutant baby!
peepsbates 7 months ago
Damned russians with their vodka and largest things
radulicah 7 months ago
Get to the Choppa!
SubZero1703 7 months ago
That's a big ass choppa!
Mycophilliac 8 months ago in playlist Watch Later #3
I always wonder why these posts turn into fights over who builds better aircraft....why cant we just appreciate technical achievements of each others aviation industries.. Russians built some cool stuff.. Americans have built some cool stuff,as have the Canadians (avro arrow) British Italians Germans and French.. and we cant forget the Swedes... Draken and Viggen... waay ahead of thier times.... just chill and enjoy the aircraft....
Truckincold 8 months ago 134
@Truckincold I agree, let's not fight about who makes better planes ... let's fight about WHOSE GOD HAS A BIGGER COCK!!!! (Carlin's line)
theangrypersian 7 months ago
@theangrypersian That would be a good suggestion...if there actually a god(dess) which there is not and if there were I would still have more balls and a bigger cock. My dog could also eat their dog.
;^)
GrigoriZhukov 7 months ago
@Truckincold america is WAY ahead of their time
tonystarification 6 months ago
@tonystarification No it isn't.
rsx123 6 months ago
@rsx123 u sure do u know about their new ballistic missle and ray gun and there new planes like the fa/37 and other jets and commercial planes
tonystarification 6 months ago
@rsx123 yeah and it's gona kill us. We need to slow down so we dont make one giant mistake
IsaacD39 5 months ago
@Truckincold i agree same with the Concorde and the tu-144
juanlmesl 6 months ago
@Truckincold You are absolutely right. Yet, I think it's a funny coincidence that for building large or extremely large helicopters you need a russian, even if he is an emigrated one (Sikorsky).
daAnder71 6 months ago
@Truckincold Shut up.
BoomBoy13 5 months ago
@Truckincold Ehh, i do agree with you except the Canadian part - the Avro Arrow was a slight modification of the F-108 Starfighter
Mattc23q 4 months ago
@Mattc23q You mean F-104.
Jer64ss 3 months ago
@Truckincold Don´t forget Santos Dumont´s 14 bis.
MrTadeo01 4 months ago
@Truckincold The same reasons all jews are good with money, all asians good at maths, and all black people are good at murder...People are idiots.
thatman64 3 months ago
@thatman64 You mean the same reasons internet trolls like you suck at spelling and making sense?
MasterADG1 3 months ago
@thatman64 blacks are good at something? wow.. first i hear lol im kidding, oh thot asians were good at kicking ass and jews at starting wars.. oooooo yeah i went there lol haha
chechita14 2 months ago
@Truckincold Totally agree. Also, bigger doesn't always mean better....
m93sek 2 months ago
don't let RAMBO see this.....
lumapas 8 months ago
And they said soviets weren't advanced ! ВОЗЬМИТЕ ЭТО РЕВНУЕТЕ USSR RULED BETTER THAN AMERICA !! U-ASS-A CAN NOT CHALLENGE THIS MASTERPIECE !!!
DaLynxfighta 8 months ago 3
Talk about Fuel Efficiency. Lol
brent07 8 months ago
@brent07 well fuel efficiency versus utility would be quite in place.
stickturn 8 months ago
but will it blend?
SuperNoobdude 8 months ago 3
U.S vs Russia = WW3 (mind the Cold War)
fsjal117 9 months ago
russian MI 12 homer...
in french.
Blobapopo7 9 months ago
its a plane with the wings chopped off and heli rotors strapped on.
firebomber39 9 months ago 29
@firebomber39 Hey... The Sputnik was only a metal ball with antenas that beeped but scared the shit out of 100 million americans...
arvelos76 8 months ago
@arvelos76 I saw sputnik 3 in 1958 while I was in Turkey....cool to see it moving across the sky!!
granskare 7 months ago
@firebomber39 everyone makes unique aircraft. i love watching the exotic ones.
20100565 6 months ago
look like a plan...no credit for this one...
nipuniub 9 months ago
Amazing machine. Somewhat same ending script as the AN225.
aizad3755 9 months ago
too bad i don know fr
NEMERITEANDSHUNI 9 months ago
WHAT?....................WHAT DID HE SAY?
AMJR4U 9 months ago
Looks like the Russians took the Fairey Rotodyne concept and developed it!!
StollyNeil 9 months ago
@StollyNeil This 'copter has absolutely NO engineering equivalent in concept or achievement with any other heli.
aizad3755 9 months ago
@aizad3755 Probably - the concept looks similar although the Rotodyne's rotor was unpowered, basically it was a massive autogyro built to overcome the need for STOL operations in those days. It never entered production. I'm guessing this beauty has powered rotors - would have loved to have seen one flying..... sigh!!!
StollyNeil 9 months ago
she aint prety tho
dimetilldeath 9 months ago
In soviet russia, helicopter pilots YOU!
wumjn 9 months ago
rayos que grande @_@
Carlangas7cabron 9 months ago
this thing is just a big ass V-22 Osprey
leralon 9 months ago
@leralon I'd rather have a V-22, this thing is just a commercial plane with some home made wings and helicopter engines. Probably didn't take long to throw together and lasted not much longer.
mudslinger1984 9 months ago
@mudslinger1984 Theres about 20 years of difference so hard to compare. Also V-22 can carry about 3 big cars (weight, not size), while this puppy can carry a V-22 loaded with 3 big cars and some more ;)
volvoxpl 9 months ago
it look like a plane
crossbred of plane and helicopter
MegaKingsim 9 months ago
A helicopter has had sex with a plane!
rushanz 9 months ago
biggest target ever......
jumpingmustang08 10 months ago
according to nanchoengineering the Russians have the balls to... invent the flying dick. yes... yes they can.
ARomanianKid14 10 months ago
Why was the project cancelled?
bittercottoncandy 10 months ago
only russians are capable of such things:)
toni2526 10 months ago
@toni2526 very true ;)
DmitriRussian 9 months ago
Pre-tay Pre-tay.. Pre-tay.. Pre-tey Good!
MagnesiumAlloy 10 months ago
Thats awsome!!
ChuckysReveng 10 months ago
the lang is french not the chopper
AKELES07 10 months ago
да бля! была такая техника!!!)
orbitalhell 11 months ago
@DylanofMD You are correct. It is in French. Awesome aircraft, can I buy one :-)?
PiperCherokeePilot91 11 months ago
they dont sound russian im russian and i know my language
ssnnkk1133 11 months ago
@ssnnkk1133 I'm pretty sure it's in French. Sounds French to me.
DylanofMD 11 months ago
And we(Americans) thought we were so clever with the MV-22 of generally the same concept....and look how long that took us to make, the russians had it figured out 50 years ago!
TheHillmanater 11 months ago
And we(Americans) thought we were so clever with the MV-22 of generally the same concept....and look how long that took us to make
TheHillmanater 11 months ago
its a half plane half helicopter
wojtek123286 11 months ago
@wojtek123286 No. Search Wikipedia for Mil V-12
F14Lolcat 10 months ago
I'm sure maintenance time is horrendous. So is fuel consumption.
transdrole 1 year ago
@transdrole Not really. It fuel consumption is comparable to consumption of a single MiG-21 old USSR jet fighter, and maintenance isn't really different from light jet airplane. The problem was it's purpose: it was meant to transport heavy ballistic missiles parts to dislocations without solid roads for land transporting, let alone airplanes usage. At certain point, lighter and more efficient missiles were built, and this helicopter became no longer needed.
michaelbuckers 11 months ago 2
This is actually a slightly bigger version of the MI-12 Bart.
Vexmachina 1 year ago
Oh wow a limo! SHOTGUN!
thedeanster18 1 year ago
Comment removed
thedeanster18 1 year ago
Yeah but whats the largest single rotor heli?
BoomBoy13 1 year ago
@BoomBoy13 MI - 26
steel54321 1 year ago
... simpson
AnimalLover201 1 year ago
looks like a FA-223 had a midair crash with a C-130 and turned into this on the way down...
secretagentmann9 1 year ago
a vast country needs vast machinery.
chindit83 1 year ago
For Russia's fetish for building largest machines...It always comes off that they're compensating for something...Am I the only one who thinks this?
brokensocks 1 year ago
Rotor wash must have been monstrous.
hectiky 1 year ago
If it's ugly, it must be British.
If it's weird, it must be French.
If it's ugly and weird, it must be Russian.
newcombstrohschein 1 year ago
@newcombstrohschein Nah all of them apply to you and what people regard you as
SaxonSmileyFace 1 year ago
@SaxonSmileyFace Ouch baby, very ouch.
newcombstrohschein 1 year ago
@newcombstrohschein yes,yes,if it's ugly,fat and dirty is american,100%hahaha
ded0511 10 months ago
Just two Mi-12 were ever built and none had practical use and both went to museums very soon. I live in Brazil.
daltonagre 1 year ago
chuck norris's ceiling fan
r0dnee 1 year ago
@r0dnee lol
ChanceReed 1 year ago
of course it is russian
Eto95 1 year ago
Russia is ever great. I live in Brazil and I'm not a communist.
daltonagre 1 year ago
@daltonagre But Brazilian are not communist \ Mas brazileiros não são comunistas
Russian3600 1 year ago
Communists make the biggest shit in the world, you gotta give them that. (Please exclude Vietnam, Cuba, and North Korea from that statement) Even the Ukraine made the biggest fuck up in Nuklear power history.
NiceHeadMr 1 year ago
is'nt this copyrighted from one of sonic the hedgehog's levels?
DemoraX 1 year ago
Haha a French broadcast of a Soviet helicopter. Why does Russia always try to build the biggest pile of junk? Wow it can lift anything, but only lasts 5 years haha.
Sp33dyD3m0n 1 year ago
This is a copy of the first NAZI helicopter,but bigger...
doormagic 1 year ago
Helicopters; I've never seen a bird fly in this fashion, so it can't be a good idea...
The7576Dave 1 year ago
@The7576Dave You haven't seen internet not lasers in nature either. Rockets? No?
Nadirion1 1 year ago
@Nadirion1 Yup and none of them are entirely good either.
Redoralive 1 year ago
@The7576Dave Humming birds, the helo of the bird world...
RustiSwordz 1 year ago
my first reaction when it took off was "holy crap it can fly"
WvWMajoR86 1 year ago
Anybody tried building an RC model of that?
rustyATV 1 year ago
етот разработчик отдал многое етому вертолёту он был оченнь добр к своим помошникам и иногие его щитали недееспособным тока из за етого и и умер так и неувидев очереди тысячи людей к своему вертолёту и амереканцы кккккогда приехали на фронцузкую выстовку они думали что равных и близа небудет но когда они увидели етт вертолёт они остолбинелили я много могу раскозать про етот вертолёт и и скажу вертолёт ето легенда можно сказать
xtra1l 1 year ago
D'OH!
Lapisme 1 year ago
how many troops could it carry?
killercrabman 1 year ago
@killercrabman
An army.
igotbored44 10 months ago
It's called Homer because NATO labels all Russian helicopters with simple names that start with H. I suppose Homer was next on the list.
This machine did everything that it was designed to do, but after the two prototypes were built, the Strategic Rocket Forces decided that they could make do with smaller and cheaper helicopters like the Mi-6 Hook.
westlock 1 year ago
those russian's lol
cartis6 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
why?
because we can :)
peterawsome 1 year ago
why?
peterawsome 1 year ago
HOLY HORSE FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
akinn97 1 year ago
Wow those Russians were just trying to make things as big as possible :P
RedBunny 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
its a bird, its a plane, its SOVIET RUSSIA
J33VANxD 1 year ago
thats a plane/helicopter hybrid
hummusiscool 1 year ago
why is this named after a poet?
solarnight25 1 year ago
@solarnight25 it's named after Homer Simpson because he's a big fat guy XD
Renard380 1 year ago
@solarnight25
'Homer' is the NATO reporting name for the Mil Mi-12.
Charger425 1 year ago
shes a right beast
123serioussam 1 year ago
dayum that's big! pictures don't do it justice, you can't tell how big it is until you see people next to it
jaw1024 1 year ago
@TheMaxwell777 Its good to be phat.
skyvilla 1 year ago
@skyvilla no its not
airsoftsniper3 1 year ago