It's pretty easy to take a bunch of clips of people using foul language and make it look like their all making a sweeping generalization about a political party, independent of the context.
The arrogance of the Left has no limits and the king of Left-wing arrogance is Bill Maher. I admit that if he were physically next to me, I would yell in his face, "THE REAL MORON IS YOU!"
Pissing off libatards is great entertainment. They just cant handle reality. Automatic meltdown if you do not agree with them. What I find amazing is that no two honest humans can have the same views on everything, but liberals/progressives are in lockstep formation. Like sheep being led off to the slaughter.
These people are so ignorant. They know nothing. They are dangerous because they think they know something, and happen to have a platform to spew. The good news is that we are wise to them.
But to say that Europe as a continent dont have any military power is total bullshit!
The size of Europe is almost like the US in size and military strenght. But thats because the US has and always will be a warlovercountry:) we europeans "gave" that skill to you when we left your country some years ago:P
Once you all were Europeans like us:P now you have gone over to beeing a country without and history,no culture and mixed people from all over the world.
@hitmannor1983 Norway did owe the US money after WW2. We should thank them for that. But the whole political system in the US is flawed. The politicians hardly speak of values and what they feel that needs to be done in order to make the USA a better country; They instead throw shit at eachother and the one who wins the fight wins the presidency. It's like watching that shitty Yo Moma show on MTV
@hitmannor1983 Actually, the Europeans spend far, far less on military things, because they huddle under the protection of uncle sam while ratcheting up their now unmanageable levels of debt.
"But thats because the US has and always will be a warlovercountry"
Typical bullshit talking culturally narcissistic Norwegian rat. Hey dumbass, if that were true, the U.S. would have invaded Canada and Mexico a long time ago.
@Fuglebolle Are you an absolute fucking retard? LOL the Mexican American war was over 100 years ago. Pretty much every country has more of a warfare history than the U.S., so your point is bullshit. Dumb foreign motherfucker.
@itachi705 And a 100 years ago is a "long time ago", which negates exactly what you claim.
Over the last half a century the US (possibly along with the former Soviet) is the country that has been involved in the most wars. If this isn't correct, it should be easy for you to give an example of a more agressive country.
Sweden has not been in a war for 200 years. And appart from WW2 this is also the case for Norway, to say that the US is a peaceful country is totally ridiculous.
@Fuglebolle Though it's true that the US has been involved in the most wars, if history teaches us anything its that the most militarily powerful governments of their time are always the ones involved in the most wars. This is because they have the resources to protect their interests when they need to or when they THINK they need to when the reality is different. The US has been no different. It doesn't mean that they are an "evil" country. I happen to theirs is a great country.
@lauraleesmithagain Having a strong military is no excuse to act violently against other countries, though it usually is required to do so. Still, China has a strong military but have used it much less on foreign countries. So I still think that the american agressivity is disproportionate to the military strength, at least for modern time.
It seems that protection of own interest is being used as an excuse to go after resources that belong to other countries.
@Fuglebolle "Still, China has a strong military..."
Because they're inclined to use it on their own citizens who rank in over 1.3 billion individuals. Are you honestly going to suggest Chinese society, contemporary and historic, is/was peaceful? A country that, less than 50 years ago exterminated tens of millions of its own people? A country that still conducts forced abortions? A country that actively suppresses the freedoms of it's people in all aspects of life under threat of death?
@Xtro2005 I never claimed that chinese politic was ideal. I brought up China to debunk the notion that a strong military necessarily imply much aggression.
While the chinese government may not handle its people well, when it comes to foreign politics I prefere the chinese ignorance of other countries over the american ignorance of human lives. Unfortunately, neighter of these policies are even close to ethical, and in this respect both China and the US are surpassed by most other countries.
@Fuglebolle "I never claimed that chinese politic was ideal"
I didn't claim you did state it was ideal, I'd hope you'd have the integrity to call it an abomination. I was criticizing your reasoning that China some how qualifies as "more peaceful" nation do to its lack of involvement in wars when juxtaposed to the US. The argument you were trying to make was rendered unintelligibly hyperbolic by the mere comparison of the two. One could make the same argument wrt North Korea as well.
@Xtro2005 China is responsible for less wars than the US i.e more peaceful. You can redefine these words all you like, but it seems to me you're trying to fit the world to your preconceptions.
It is true that in China you have more reason to fear your government than in the US, but you have much less reason to fear violence and crime from your fellow citizen. How can it be peaceful in a country where guns flourish?
@Fuglebolle "China is responsible for less wars than the US i.e more peaceful"
China would only appear more peaceful through the glass of a horribly lopsided and cherry picked analysis. What connotation could the phrase "more peaceful" when the historical context of Chinese megadeath is considered? The only way you could reach such an inane conclusion is to entirely exclude domestic policies and behaviors. In which case your analysis is hopelessly flawed.
@Xtro2005 I did exclude domestic policies, and in the context (replying to the claim that all countries with large armies show much agression towards other countries) it is a reasonable exclusion.
However, when it comes to domestic policies it is still not obvious which regime is worse. And if China is a little worse, it probably won't be for long as China is improving fast while the US shows no signs of change at all.
Still, I prefere most other countries over both the US and China.
@Fuglebolle "I did exclude domestic policies, and in the context...it is a reasonable exclusion"
By no means is it a rational exclusion. In this context what meaning would your assertion that America isn't a peaceful nation carry other than to suggest America has been involved in more wars. By excluding domestic policies and behaviors, as mundane as mere verbal resistance to war your conclusion is rendered moot, the protect of so much cherry picking.
@Xtro2005 I am in no way suggesting that violent domestic policies are mundane. But the fact that something is not mundane does not imply that it is relevant in every context. The original context which I were discussing was solely on foreign policy, i.e domestic policies were not relevant. And I stand by my claim, that the chinese foreign policy is preferable over the US one, even though the level ethics in Chinese foreign policy is miles below the policy of most smaller countries.
What you're doing is trying reinforce your wide sweeping generalization of the US by centering only one aspect of it's being. This kind of myopic thinking would be the only source for your earlier china vs us hyperbole. As we all know China violence has been historically inward in an attempt to suppress a massive population. Their lack of imperialistic ventures outside of Asia does nothing to improve their record for violence.
@Xtro2005 You're being completely ridiculous and beside the point. Read carefully:
I wasn't discussing anything other than foreign politics atm.
Yes, I do realize that there are more to a country than it's foreign politics, to suggest otherwise is completely absurd. And to narrow a discussion is in no way the same as a generalization.
On another subject: Yes, I know that China has a history of state violence which still exist today, though improving fast. The US is also a country of violence.
Ridiculous In that I've criticized your accusation that America is an aggressive nation based on one very superficial observation regarding the number of wars the US government has been involved in? Yes its abundantly clear that you're only referring to it's foreign politics, insomuch as they involve wars. I wouldn't expect you to mention their military's relief efforts in Haiti for example. That might require a wider scope of inquiry. I think you've made your point clear.
@Xtro2005 I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression. And this is where we seem to differ.
More fundamentally you appear to be under the impression that I'm trying to paint an all-black picture of the US, which is not the case at all. I am an American citizen myself (even though I haven't lived there much).
Still, the fact that the US is highly agressive towards other countries is a fact that does not become untrue through relief effords and problems in China.
@Fuglebolle "I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression. And this is where we seem to differ."
But for reasons of cherry picking domestic aggression isn't considered. I believe the reason why you've excluded this information is apparent: you know that if you were to consider such factors you couldn't rationalize your view of America and more over Americans.
@Xtro2005 This has nothing to do with a general view of America or Americans. My original subject was nothing more or less than the american tendency to war.
I would not call domestic violence for 'aggression', but that is a matter of definition, and this my be where you've misunderstood my point.
If I were to also consider domestic violence, I would not give China as an example, but probably some European country.
China fit the point I was making, but not your interpretation of it.
@Fuglebolle "This has nothing to do with a general view of America or Americans."
And yet you've seen fit to pronounce that America (and by implication Americans) is an aggressive nation while turning a blind eye the violent behaviors of others by deliberately framing your argument as to exclude them.
"I would not call domestic violence for 'aggression"
You wouldn't refer to a government's domestic violence a form of a aggression? What is said violence's purpose but to suppress?
@Xtro2005 You're confusing the words 'aggression' and 'violence'. These are not synonyms.
'Aggression' is an attitude toward others, you can be violent toward yourself, but not aggressive toward yourself.
I quarrel the definition of 'agressive' with you all day (and read about the implications you fallaciously claim I make), but I've got better things to do.
I stand by my statement as I made it, but not by every misinterpretations and redefinitions of it.
@Fuglebolle the US has been attacked 2 times and to defend itself went to war, I wonder if the japs had the bomb if they would of used it to sucker ounch us? YES THEY WOULD HAVE! if arab nations right now had the power the US had America and Israel would of been wiped of the map along time ago! gulf war we stopped saddam from invading kuwait, sorry if we dont let evil countries start aother WW3 WW2 we were helping countries against the evil nazis!
i agree with you about the islamic invasion of Europe...Its like a sickness we need to stop.
And yes we have to freaking much bureaucracy here for sure..
But all that aside we live in a peaceful place with alot of money and no debt to anyone at all..(talking about Norway now)The EU wich Norway IS not a member of thank god is having moneyproblems greece and ireland is already broke almost:P
The American people voted against thier far-left agenda and these liberals can not stand it. All they have left is personal attacks of Conservatives and Republican until obama is defeated in 2012. Yes, it's childish and petty but liberals never ever claimed to have standards or dignity!
Sir, I fear that all we've succeeded in accomplishing was to awaken the giant......
Main stream media you're days as tools for the politicians or as their propaganda machines has come to an end. Goodnight Mr. Soros wherever you are; Only a few more days George before the world learns what you've done, what you're doing and what your plans actually are. Let the sun shine upon and expose George Soros' true nature and his true intentions.
I was at a few tea party events. A very tiny number of racists signs were in the crowd and other tea party members politely asked them to put the signs away because that was not what the tea party movement was about.
@Lighthouse724 Sorry, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA and the Housing Bill that opened the door for outsource of our jobs and the housing failure. It took several years to cause failure of our economy. GWB and Obama are now blamed for the failure. Even Clinton has agreed it was a mistake. GWB made some mistakes also, but the Democrats started the problem.
One thing for sure, why would anyone want to be President in the 24/7 news cycle. Not enough money in the world for me to take that job...
In January of this year, the last inkling of power your vote had was taken away. Directly afterwards, Karl Rove moved to streamline corporate corruption of U.S. politics in a way not even dreamed of in American history. This resulted in campaign ads focussed exclusively on fear, and zero substance. If you bought into this, or think our political system is about Dems vs. Reps, then yes, you are woefully ignorant...
On Tuesday, we got a good start at putting the radicals back in the closet because of the far left radicals like the people in this video. In 2012, we will get the remaining Democrats out of office and put sanity back in charge. Obama just had the largest election sweep against his administration since the 1930's. You radicals have pis*sed off mainstream America. We are going to watch your every move and outsmart you. Yes, we are the smart ones. You elected the worst President in History.
HUH? Obama is the worst president in History? 100. 000 people are dead because Bush thought Irak had WMD's What has Obama done that was worse than that?
@JUDALATION Obama's Drones ki**lls innocent men, women and children all the time in Afganaistan. Liberal media covers it up. About Bush: Collen Powell and Hillary also said they were WMD's their. GWB was advised they were WMD's their.
Thats the best ya got? Just so ya know the drones were used during the bush administration and the generals on the ground told Obama they need to use these drones. Obama has not been a great president... But a donkeys arse would be a millions times better than Bush... or any nutjob teababber for that matter!
@JUDALATION I never said Bush did not use Drones. It's the safest way to get targets and avoid IED's. The liberals complained about Bush and Drones but are silent when Obama uses them even at a much higher rate. Double standard.
Bush made mistake, but alot of his problems were caused by Bill Clinton's NAFTA and the Housing Bill. No job or credit to buy a home. The housing problem is as bad as the economy and jobs. Your mistaken about the tea party, all political parties
Respond to this video... Like all past Presidents, Bush does not complain about Bill Clinton or Obama.
Clinton and Obama have becoming 24/7 whiners trying to divert attention from their mistakes. It makes both of them look weak, no cojones. They need to man up and take what they were given and move on. I think it was clear on 11/2 when Democrats, Independents and Conservatives voted against the current administration. Obama's change is different than what America wanted.
People may be ignorant but they do watch T.V. Seems these people don't like to be called ignorant so they went out and did something about it. It will be nice when Carter/Obama loses in 2012.
@vsnips Actually I would say that in a TRUE democratic society, the numbers should look more like 95% of eligible voters do vote, with the other 5% perhaps just sick, or too busy. Keep searching google, you'll also see it is a common trend in this country for around half of its population to not vote. That is a pretty big deal if you think about it, as many moderates or disenfranchised folk that have become disappointed by their party are now not voting. While the fringe will rally to vote.
Sorry, voting doesn't mean you know the issues. I've had long talks with t-baggers and they really don't understand the history or the issues. Posting a bunch of people who pointed this out doesn't make it any less true.
@sentinel41 The Tea Baggers are more educated and more engaged in the issues than the morons that voted for Obama for a free smoke, free happy meal, a couple of $ or worse yet because of the color of his skin. Look what the morons have done to this country. He just cost 66 Democrats Congress their jobs. We will make sure they never come back. We have all the data we need. Worst President ever...
@Diatonic5th not so much? the elitist establishment defeated o' donnell, not comrade maher. yeah, supporting a self-confess communist is so much better then o'donnell. the progressive movement is done.
@raidergunz apparently your not to smart, or worse yet ill-informed, chris coons is a documented communist/socialist member/supporter. coons has accepted endorsements from, knowing full well these groups have deliberately and quite publicly tied themselves to supporters of terrorism, communism and socialism? These are facts, not opinion. You do know the differences?
@arubberball Dude, you say, and I quote "chris coons is a documented communist/socialist member/supporter.".
First thing: Like if they are the same? Socialist mean a democracy that include the economy, like having a shop owned by the workers. Communist also include classless&equalitarian society.
Secondly: I did not hear Coons talking about that recently... And I remember that he work for the republican with Reagan and Bill Roth. It is not that I like Conns, I think he is a pedantic assholes...
@therrydicule yeah, as a teenager he campaigned for Reagan, so what, Hillary campaigned for a republican as a teenager, and we see where she went from there. it seems your missing the point. what one generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace. nice try at splitting hairs. socialism leads to communism. socialism as a whole has, and always will fail.
All modern industrialized nations have some form of socialism. You can call chris Coons a socialist/communist all you want he's senator now so to bad.
@raidergunz We will vote Coons out in the next election. He will be just like Grayson. Gone in a flash. All Coons has to do is vote with Obama and we will get him just like the 66 we just got rid of. Wish I could be a fly on the wall when they pack their bags in December. I am sure they will have something negative to say about Obama and the end of their career. Thanks to Obama.... In 2012 we will reverse most of Obama's actions.
@arubberball First of all: What kind of communist will campaigned for a republican? Secondly, if you consider Hillary as a "social-liberal", well how do you explain her soft use of the realist framework - meaning prepare war, and don't start financial interdependence with country that are not trust-able?
Socialism lead to communist... Well, again no, for me it seem like a fallacy.I simply don't see how Lula Da Silva is linked to Ernst Bloch without independent pieces.
@therrydicule Apparently you didn't read the article I sent you about Coons, and his long history with socialist/communist groups. On the issue of Mrs. Clinton,"The Ends Justify The Means", no more needs to be said. Obama is quoted as saying Lula is, the most popular politician on earth. It's amazing we cannot drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, but Obama sends billions to Brazil, to just that, drill for oil. You should read Liberal Fascism, by Jonah Goldberg.
@arubberball Liberal fascism...I read article at a "slightly" higher level in political science - like Langman or Huntingdon or Koser... So, when someone argue that the one in favor of increasing financial interdependence to increase peace, which is part of the liberal ideologies, have roote in a glorification of the state, racism and anti-communist by an irrational view (which is, ideologically, what Mussolini and Hitler were about), I just want to say "are you stupid, or you just don't know?".
@arubberball You know, I would agree that there is a form of corporatism taking place in america but... That does not really come from liberals as such. And that, even if the concentration of power in Washinton is alarming (army - executive - lobby - corporation being present and making choice of being over the equilibrium point of social cost and social benefit for military), it is not as near than during the Mussolini era - in other word, it is shit but it did not hit the fan yet.
@therrydicule Your right its doesn't come from liberals so much. What worries me, and it should give you pause is,progressive( Bush is a progressive, as well as Obama, they both have the same goals) masquerading as, liberal democrats, and moderate/compassionate republicans. Hitler, and Mussolini were satisfied with fascism at the national level. Where communism desires world authority. I am currently reading, Road to Serfdom now.
@arubberball Yeap, someone might have to "sue" them one day for false representation... At the same time you will not catch me say that Bush or Obama as progressive - in some really odd ways, Robert Borden was more progressive than Bush and even if Borden was in obligation to be more progressive than what he ought, this is really not a good example of political reform or civil liberties...
@therrydicule I'd point out that corporations on average do much better under democrats than republicans. Up to you to figure out what that statistic means though.
We love our country, our God and maybe they don't get it when they see a map of America thats solid red except for the west coast and New England. they can't deal with it! losers!
Bill Maher is scary. Everyone who disagrees with him is stupid? I wonder where this sliding to the right and to the left is going to collide? "May you live in interesting times."
THESE are the elite left, who think we are all, too stupid too govern ourselves.............. because anyone who thinks would believe them, really are, too stupid to govern themselves.
I was a big supporter of Ron Paul until about 3 years ago when a lot of racists people started joining this thing called the Tea Party.
I remember when Bush was in office and it was just a few of us out there supporting some of the Tea Party views but I stepped aside when things took a ugly turn. Of-course I'm in Colorado so the Tea Party may have had this kinda following in other states.
It just really upsets me so much that so many in the party are very racists.
The elections just confirmed what they said ...... AMERICANS ARE NUTS, NO QUESTION. THEY REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE DOING. EMOTIONAL SPOILED CHILDISH KIDS WHO BELIEVE IN A WIZARD OF OZ WORLD IN WHICH THE PROBLEMS THEY CAUSED (CREDIT CARD DEBY = #1 BUSINESS IN THE US, WITH CRIMINAL PREMIUMS AND LOANS) ARE TURNING BACK AGAINST THEM AND THEY WANT TO SOLVE THEM WITH A MAGIC WAND, WHICH HISTORICALLY NEVER WORKED (TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH, CORPORATISM). AMERICA DESERVES TO BE IN A RECESSION.
I love how liberals think that they are so smart. And if you listen to for example schiff radio he gets question about FED, gold standard, regulations... most of the liberal idiots don't know what the FED is.
@Panglos Garafolo says beingRepublican is a mental disorder;Maher feels the same way if you disagree over Global Warming or Religion;no analysis would justify their arrogance.
@henrik1905 your welcome! They don't understand that it was Bush who got us into this mess with 2 wars that were not needed and the crash of wall street with the lack of regulation. But since Obama can't fix the 8 years of mess in 2 they vote the people who want LESS regulaton back in! ARE YO UKIDDING ME??? HOW DUMB DO YOU HAVE TO BE??? I don't get it I really don't they need to learn how to search for answers and not take everything Faux News says seriously. RAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
@Lou20290 u merst beez an allegals i say derrr uze gotza teh werd spahnish een urss naimss. SLAP YOURSELF YOU FOOL! You know illegal immigration is not anything new right? NATIVE AMERICANS called it white people you IDIOT! Payback is a ish huh? Now I would suggest that you actually learn to think with a logical rational mind. That is impossible for the right to do though because if you did you would be a liberal. An Atheist liberal the best thing to ever happen to America and needs to be more.
@SpaNisHLOV3 SCREW YOU YOU LIBERAL DIRTBAG...WE COULD PUT ALL YOU LIBTURDS IN A BAG AND THROW YOU OVERBOARD AND YOU WOULD STILL COME TO THE TOP BECAUSE SHIT FLOATS.....
@SpaNisHLOV3 i know right. bill maher is such a genius compared to anyone on the right, and he actually has a pretty good point when he calls the people dumb. it's like they don't know what's good for them and they don't give a sh-- about the people around them in the world
@henrik1905 now i know you are really dumb--thinking bill maher is a genuis...he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground and you probably don't either---like I said if you are so concerned for the terrorists go over there and sign up for their suicide mission......
@Lou20290 you think i support the suicide bombers? no, i support the civilians of iraq, afghanistan and iran who are being raped by america because of twenty muslims flying some airplanes into some building. is it just me or is that kinda fucked up?
@Lou20290 and if you've watched religilous you have to know that bill maher is a genius, and he is brave for standing up to the crazy religious people like he does
@henrik1905 It really is pointless to have a serious debate with him. Try to have some fun with his mind. Own it and watch him run in circles like a good right wing loon. It's really sad when their most known faces are Sarah Palin and Christine O'Donnell...Pretty much self explanatory of the Republican party.
@SpaNisHLOV3 yeah, right wing loons are right below dogs when it comes to iq. and i know, it's like they keep throwing those retarded "good" looking female politicians just to seem like they're down with civil rights
@Lou20290 Also it is proven that Atheist Liberals have higher IQ's on average then Religious Republicans. To that I reply DUUUUUUUHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhh. You are incapable of seeing this and I feel sorry for you because it is a problem with your brain that keeps you from having critical thinking abilities. In the perfect America Atheist would be the majority and everyone would have health care. But as long as the R(everse) are around that is going to be very hard to do. SarahPalinChristineO'donellLOL!
@SpaNisHLOV3 HANG ON TO THOSE IRRATIONAL THOUGHTS OF YOURS BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED THEM IN HELL!!!! HA HA ENJOY YOUR TIME THERE BECAUSE IT IS FOR ALL ETERNITY....NOW DON'T BOTHER ME ANYMORE BECAUSE YOU ARE BEGINNING TO BORE ME.....
@Lou20290 HAHA hell doesn't exist buddy. Did you know that when you die it's just like before you were born? and your body just rots in the ground and you are forgotten like 99.9% of the people before you? there is no heaven, this life is not a waiting room, and we are all going to die. And one day Earth will not exist anymore. But you cling to your bible and pray to your god. I'm sure he is as real to you as air is, but the difference is you can live without one of them. Humans created God.
Yep, conservatives don't call liberalss names at all, pinhead.
wizardsbane 8 months ago
It's pretty easy to take a bunch of clips of people using foul language and make it look like their all making a sweeping generalization about a political party, independent of the context.
jessemaurais 10 months ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
The arrogance of the Left has no limits and the king of Left-wing arrogance is Bill Maher. I admit that if he were physically next to me, I would yell in his face, "THE REAL MORON IS YOU!"
Aegius 1 year ago
Pissing off libatards is great entertainment. They just cant handle reality. Automatic meltdown if you do not agree with them. What I find amazing is that no two honest humans can have the same views on everything, but liberals/progressives are in lockstep formation. Like sheep being led off to the slaughter.
moirajean8 1 year ago
These people are so ignorant. They know nothing. They are dangerous because they think they know something, and happen to have a platform to spew. The good news is that we are wise to them.
harry4now 1 year ago
I wish I could arrange for these piss ants to say this stuff to my face. Gutless cowards that they are.
PeaceThruCapitalism 1 year ago 5
keith olbermann calling someone a corporate slave?
What?
...
freelancergin 1 year ago 13
@DirtCrashr
But to say that Europe as a continent dont have any military power is total bullshit!
The size of Europe is almost like the US in size and military strenght. But thats because the US has and always will be a warlovercountry:) we europeans "gave" that skill to you when we left your country some years ago:P
Once you all were Europeans like us:P now you have gone over to beeing a country without and history,no culture and mixed people from all over the world.
hitmannor1983 1 year ago
@hitmannor1983 Norway did owe the US money after WW2. We should thank them for that. But the whole political system in the US is flawed. The politicians hardly speak of values and what they feel that needs to be done in order to make the USA a better country; They instead throw shit at eachother and the one who wins the fight wins the presidency. It's like watching that shitty Yo Moma show on MTV
SwitcherLittlebW 1 year ago
@hitmannor1983 Actually, the Europeans spend far, far less on military things, because they huddle under the protection of uncle sam while ratcheting up their now unmanageable levels of debt.
mendelbot 1 year ago
@hitmannor1983
"But thats because the US has and always will be a warlovercountry"
Typical bullshit talking culturally narcissistic Norwegian rat. Hey dumbass, if that were true, the U.S. would have invaded Canada and Mexico a long time ago.
itachi705 1 year ago
@itachi705 If it weren't true, the US wouldn't have invaded Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistn, Iraq..etc. And that's just in the last 50 years or so.
And the US did invade Mexico a long time ago. In the Mexican-American War.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle Are you an absolute fucking retard? LOL the Mexican American war was over 100 years ago. Pretty much every country has more of a warfare history than the U.S., so your point is bullshit. Dumb foreign motherfucker.
itachi705 1 year ago
@itachi705 And a 100 years ago is a "long time ago", which negates exactly what you claim.
Over the last half a century the US (possibly along with the former Soviet) is the country that has been involved in the most wars. If this isn't correct, it should be easy for you to give an example of a more agressive country.
Sweden has not been in a war for 200 years. And appart from WW2 this is also the case for Norway, to say that the US is a peaceful country is totally ridiculous.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle Though it's true that the US has been involved in the most wars, if history teaches us anything its that the most militarily powerful governments of their time are always the ones involved in the most wars. This is because they have the resources to protect their interests when they need to or when they THINK they need to when the reality is different. The US has been no different. It doesn't mean that they are an "evil" country. I happen to theirs is a great country.
lauraleesmithagain 1 year ago
@lauraleesmithagain Having a strong military is no excuse to act violently against other countries, though it usually is required to do so. Still, China has a strong military but have used it much less on foreign countries. So I still think that the american agressivity is disproportionate to the military strength, at least for modern time.
It seems that protection of own interest is being used as an excuse to go after resources that belong to other countries.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "Still, China has a strong military..."
Because they're inclined to use it on their own citizens who rank in over 1.3 billion individuals. Are you honestly going to suggest Chinese society, contemporary and historic, is/was peaceful? A country that, less than 50 years ago exterminated tens of millions of its own people? A country that still conducts forced abortions? A country that actively suppresses the freedoms of it's people in all aspects of life under threat of death?
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 I never claimed that chinese politic was ideal. I brought up China to debunk the notion that a strong military necessarily imply much aggression.
While the chinese government may not handle its people well, when it comes to foreign politics I prefere the chinese ignorance of other countries over the american ignorance of human lives. Unfortunately, neighter of these policies are even close to ethical, and in this respect both China and the US are surpassed by most other countries.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "I never claimed that chinese politic was ideal"
I didn't claim you did state it was ideal, I'd hope you'd have the integrity to call it an abomination. I was criticizing your reasoning that China some how qualifies as "more peaceful" nation do to its lack of involvement in wars when juxtaposed to the US. The argument you were trying to make was rendered unintelligibly hyperbolic by the mere comparison of the two. One could make the same argument wrt North Korea as well.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 China is responsible for less wars than the US i.e more peaceful. You can redefine these words all you like, but it seems to me you're trying to fit the world to your preconceptions.
It is true that in China you have more reason to fear your government than in the US, but you have much less reason to fear violence and crime from your fellow citizen. How can it be peaceful in a country where guns flourish?
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "China is responsible for less wars than the US i.e more peaceful"
China would only appear more peaceful through the glass of a horribly lopsided and cherry picked analysis. What connotation could the phrase "more peaceful" when the historical context of Chinese megadeath is considered? The only way you could reach such an inane conclusion is to entirely exclude domestic policies and behaviors. In which case your analysis is hopelessly flawed.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 I did exclude domestic policies, and in the context (replying to the claim that all countries with large armies show much agression towards other countries) it is a reasonable exclusion.
However, when it comes to domestic policies it is still not obvious which regime is worse. And if China is a little worse, it probably won't be for long as China is improving fast while the US shows no signs of change at all.
Still, I prefere most other countries over both the US and China.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "I did exclude domestic policies, and in the context...it is a reasonable exclusion"
By no means is it a rational exclusion. In this context what meaning would your assertion that America isn't a peaceful nation carry other than to suggest America has been involved in more wars. By excluding domestic policies and behaviors, as mundane as mere verbal resistance to war your conclusion is rendered moot, the protect of so much cherry picking.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 I am in no way suggesting that violent domestic policies are mundane. But the fact that something is not mundane does not imply that it is relevant in every context. The original context which I were discussing was solely on foreign policy, i.e domestic policies were not relevant. And I stand by my claim, that the chinese foreign policy is preferable over the US one, even though the level ethics in Chinese foreign policy is miles below the policy of most smaller countries.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "But the fact that something..."
What you're doing is trying reinforce your wide sweeping generalization of the US by centering only one aspect of it's being. This kind of myopic thinking would be the only source for your earlier china vs us hyperbole. As we all know China violence has been historically inward in an attempt to suppress a massive population. Their lack of imperialistic ventures outside of Asia does nothing to improve their record for violence.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 You're being completely ridiculous and beside the point. Read carefully:
I wasn't discussing anything other than foreign politics atm.
Yes, I do realize that there are more to a country than it's foreign politics, to suggest otherwise is completely absurd. And to narrow a discussion is in no way the same as a generalization.
On another subject: Yes, I know that China has a history of state violence which still exist today, though improving fast. The US is also a country of violence.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle
Ridiculous In that I've criticized your accusation that America is an aggressive nation based on one very superficial observation regarding the number of wars the US government has been involved in? Yes its abundantly clear that you're only referring to it's foreign politics, insomuch as they involve wars. I wouldn't expect you to mention their military's relief efforts in Haiti for example. That might require a wider scope of inquiry. I think you've made your point clear.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression. And this is where we seem to differ.
More fundamentally you appear to be under the impression that I'm trying to paint an all-black picture of the US, which is not the case at all. I am an American citizen myself (even though I haven't lived there much).
Still, the fact that the US is highly agressive towards other countries is a fact that does not become untrue through relief effords and problems in China.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fuglebolle "I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression"
But not domestic aggression apparently.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fuglebolle "I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression. And this is where we seem to differ."
But you refuse to include domestic aggression. Which is why I'm pointing out their your analysis is rather myopic.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "I believe that agressivity is measured in amount of agression. And this is where we seem to differ."
But for reasons of cherry picking domestic aggression isn't considered. I believe the reason why you've excluded this information is apparent: you know that if you were to consider such factors you couldn't rationalize your view of America and more over Americans.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 This has nothing to do with a general view of America or Americans. My original subject was nothing more or less than the american tendency to war.
I would not call domestic violence for 'aggression', but that is a matter of definition, and this my be where you've misunderstood my point.
If I were to also consider domestic violence, I would not give China as an example, but probably some European country.
China fit the point I was making, but not your interpretation of it.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle "This has nothing to do with a general view of America or Americans."
And yet you've seen fit to pronounce that America (and by implication Americans) is an aggressive nation while turning a blind eye the violent behaviors of others by deliberately framing your argument as to exclude them.
"I would not call domestic violence for 'aggression"
You wouldn't refer to a government's domestic violence a form of a aggression? What is said violence's purpose but to suppress?
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Xtro2005 You're confusing the words 'aggression' and 'violence'. These are not synonyms.
'Aggression' is an attitude toward others, you can be violent toward yourself, but not aggressive toward yourself.
I quarrel the definition of 'agressive' with you all day (and read about the implications you fallaciously claim I make), but I've got better things to do.
I stand by my statement as I made it, but not by every misinterpretations and redefinitions of it.
Fuglebolle 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Fuglebolle "You're confusing the words..."
Of course.
"I stand by my statement..."
I was fairly certain you weren't going to change your mind went I entered into this conversation.
"I've got better things to do"
Please do.
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xtro2005 1 year ago
@Fuglebolle the US has been attacked 2 times and to defend itself went to war, I wonder if the japs had the bomb if they would of used it to sucker ounch us? YES THEY WOULD HAVE! if arab nations right now had the power the US had America and Israel would of been wiped of the map along time ago! gulf war we stopped saddam from invading kuwait, sorry if we dont let evil countries start aother WW3 WW2 we were helping countries against the evil nazis!
TheHabit00 1 year ago
@DirtCrashr
hahaha! i love comments like this:))
i agree with you about the islamic invasion of Europe...Its like a sickness we need to stop.
And yes we have to freaking much bureaucracy here for sure..
But all that aside we live in a peaceful place with alot of money and no debt to anyone at all..(talking about Norway now)The EU wich Norway IS not a member of thank god is having moneyproblems greece and ireland is already broke almost:P
hitmannor1983 1 year ago
@LibertarianINT
LOL!! when in the world did Norway owe anyone money? hahaha
We have plenty more than we can spend.
Yeah we are a nice safe "nanny" state where healthcare is considered a people right to have.
And it is...
Good luck with your American bullcrap:P i love to visit the US on holiday i rly do..But i wouldent live there if my life depended on it! haha..
hitmannor1983 1 year ago
Yes it was Overbite,that why we voted these vermin off the island.
marine919 1 year ago
They're all a bunch of weird naked masturbating bearded Marxist witches!
They're all a bunch of vile racists!
ronpaulisacommunist 1 year ago
And the lemmings that voted for Obama.....
evets00 1 year ago
I guess us stupid,racist,homophobic,redneck hillbillies did have enough sense to vote! The educated elite liberals did not! So who is foolish?
fatman0349 1 year ago
We DID!
rrunkle 1 year ago
awww, the liberals lost to a bunch of stupid red neck tea bagger's with "neurological problems". What does that tell you about the left?
mkmny2010 1 year ago
The American people voted against thier far-left agenda and these liberals can not stand it. All they have left is personal attacks of Conservatives and Republican until obama is defeated in 2012. Yes, it's childish and petty but liberals never ever claimed to have standards or dignity!
dantheleo 1 year ago
Sir, I fear that all we've succeeded in accomplishing was to awaken the giant......
Main stream media you're days as tools for the politicians or as their propaganda machines has come to an end. Goodnight Mr. Soros wherever you are; Only a few more days George before the world learns what you've done, what you're doing and what your plans actually are. Let the sun shine upon and expose George Soros' true nature and his true intentions.
miamistorm 1 year ago
Being that we won is America become more stupid and racist? Lame stream media.
clash360 1 year ago
I was at a few tea party events. A very tiny number of racists signs were in the crowd and other tea party members politely asked them to put the signs away because that was not what the tea party movement was about.
jscottupton 1 year ago
SUCK. IT.
retownsend 1 year ago
@Lighthouse724 Sorry, Bill Clinton signed NAFTA and the Housing Bill that opened the door for outsource of our jobs and the housing failure. It took several years to cause failure of our economy. GWB and Obama are now blamed for the failure. Even Clinton has agreed it was a mistake. GWB made some mistakes also, but the Democrats started the problem.
One thing for sure, why would anyone want to be President in the 24/7 news cycle. Not enough money in the world for me to take that job...
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
Ew.
That last clip of Keithy-poo rocking to & fro in his chair was psycho-creepy.
I bet there are frothing, babbling explosions of him on the cutting room floor.
Zapppo 1 year ago
In January of this year, the last inkling of power your vote had was taken away. Directly afterwards, Karl Rove moved to streamline corporate corruption of U.S. politics in a way not even dreamed of in American history. This resulted in campaign ads focussed exclusively on fear, and zero substance. If you bought into this, or think our political system is about Dems vs. Reps, then yes, you are woefully ignorant...
chiachuck 1 year ago
@chiachuck Well said, a good critique on the fundamentals of our current "democratic" system.
adriank1223 1 year ago
On Tuesday, we got a good start at putting the radicals back in the closet because of the far left radicals like the people in this video. In 2012, we will get the remaining Democrats out of office and put sanity back in charge. Obama just had the largest election sweep against his administration since the 1930's. You radicals have pis*sed off mainstream America. We are going to watch your every move and outsmart you. Yes, we are the smart ones. You elected the worst President in History.
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
HUH? Obama is the worst president in History? 100. 000 people are dead because Bush thought Irak had WMD's What has Obama done that was worse than that?
JUDALATION 1 year ago
@JUDALATION Obama's Drones ki**lls innocent men, women and children all the time in Afganaistan. Liberal media covers it up. About Bush: Collen Powell and Hillary also said they were WMD's their. GWB was advised they were WMD's their.
Housane, Hiltler, whats is the difference?
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
Thats the best ya got? Just so ya know the drones were used during the bush administration and the generals on the ground told Obama they need to use these drones. Obama has not been a great president... But a donkeys arse would be a millions times better than Bush... or any nutjob teababber for that matter!
JUDALATION 1 year ago
@JUDALATION I never said Bush did not use Drones. It's the safest way to get targets and avoid IED's. The liberals complained about Bush and Drones but are silent when Obama uses them even at a much higher rate. Double standard.
Bush made mistake, but alot of his problems were caused by Bill Clinton's NAFTA and the Housing Bill. No job or credit to buy a home. The housing problem is as bad as the economy and jobs. Your mistaken about the tea party, all political parties
are engaged.
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
Respond to this video... Like all past Presidents, Bush does not complain about Bill Clinton or Obama.
Clinton and Obama have becoming 24/7 whiners trying to divert attention from their mistakes. It makes both of them look weak, no cojones. They need to man up and take what they were given and move on. I think it was clear on 11/2 when Democrats, Independents and Conservatives voted against the current administration. Obama's change is different than what America wanted.
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
@Bigmac8247
0/10
Too much narcissism in this post.
nagasako7 1 year ago
People may be ignorant but they do watch T.V. Seems these people don't like to be called ignorant so they went out and did something about it. It will be nice when Carter/Obama loses in 2012.
Bluetempo 1 year ago
Comment removed
cf19d 1 year ago
Obozofites lost
vsnips 1 year ago
There's some sore ass losers commenting in here, majority voted, dems and the lib agenda lost big time. Suck it up
vsnips 1 year ago
@vsnips The majority didn't vote.
supersonicslowmotion 1 year ago
@supersonicslowmotion Majority of voters, the rest don't matter.
vsnips 1 year ago
@vsnips Actually, only about 40% of the American public voted. And usually the party that isn't in control will have the higher turn-out.
adriank1223 1 year ago
@adriank1223 peolple that do not vote don't matter anyway, but i would like to know where you found 40%, i could not find that
vsnips 1 year ago
@vsnips Actually I would say that in a TRUE democratic society, the numbers should look more like 95% of eligible voters do vote, with the other 5% perhaps just sick, or too busy. Keep searching google, you'll also see it is a common trend in this country for around half of its population to not vote. That is a pretty big deal if you think about it, as many moderates or disenfranchised folk that have become disappointed by their party are now not voting. While the fringe will rally to vote.
adriank1223 1 year ago
@adriank1223 I agree voter turnout in the counrty is a big deal, and sad. Thanks for info
vsnips 1 year ago
@vsnips hey np, take it easy.
adriank1223 1 year ago
All those persons in the video, THEY ARE RIGHT!
afroboy256 1 year ago
Last time I checked, all of those names were pretty accurate. Oh you teabaggers, you're all so dumb.
xrandomxiamx 1 year ago
I hope Bill Maher gets testicular cancer
efboo2010 1 year ago
They can all go to hell, guess they have a clue now.
flounderjig 1 year ago
Has Queef shot himself yet? I hope so.
Mongrul 1 year ago
Fear and lies gets people to vote.
majoraccident13 1 year ago
Their arrogance is astounding!
RestorationGirl64 1 year ago
HA HA HA...! !!! All those sound bites are GREAT! Tea bagging morons!!!
chompers88 1 year ago
Sorry, voting doesn't mean you know the issues. I've had long talks with t-baggers and they really don't understand the history or the issues. Posting a bunch of people who pointed this out doesn't make it any less true.
sentinel41 1 year ago
@sentinel41 The Tea Baggers are more educated and more engaged in the issues than the morons that voted for Obama for a free smoke, free happy meal, a couple of $ or worse yet because of the color of his skin. Look what the morons have done to this country. He just cost 66 Democrats Congress their jobs. We will make sure they never come back. We have all the data we need. Worst President ever...
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
@Bigmac8247 I'm sorry, Barak could shoot a couple of nuns, and he still wouldn't be worse than Bush.
AIRDAM1 1 year ago
How's that hopey-changey thing workin' out for you?
trancev94 1 year ago
I'm voting for Sarah Palin in 2012 just to make these liberal whackjobs go bat-shit crazy.
JimboVids 1 year ago
@JimboVids Yeah, you matter, people really care what you think.
quathar 1 year ago
Mock Bill Maher all you want, but that man single-handedly destroyed Christine O'Donnell's campaign.
Diatonic5th 1 year ago
@Diatonic5th not so much? the elitist establishment defeated o' donnell, not comrade maher. yeah, supporting a self-confess communist is so much better then o'donnell. the progressive movement is done.
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball
you can't just call anyone smarter than you a communist it gives you no credibility.
and Bill Maher did defeat her campaign, the democrats thought Delaware was a lost cause until Bill showed her true colors.
raidergunz 1 year ago
@raidergunz apparently your not to smart, or worse yet ill-informed, chris coons is a documented communist/socialist member/supporter. coons has accepted endorsements from, knowing full well these groups have deliberately and quite publicly tied themselves to supporters of terrorism, communism and socialism? These are facts, not opinion. You do know the differences?
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball Dude, you say, and I quote "chris coons is a documented communist/socialist member/supporter.".
First thing: Like if they are the same? Socialist mean a democracy that include the economy, like having a shop owned by the workers. Communist also include classless&equalitarian society.
Secondly: I did not hear Coons talking about that recently... And I remember that he work for the republican with Reagan and Bill Roth. It is not that I like Conns, I think he is a pedantic assholes...
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule yeah, as a teenager he campaigned for Reagan, so what, Hillary campaigned for a republican as a teenager, and we see where she went from there. it seems your missing the point. what one generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace. nice try at splitting hairs. socialism leads to communism. socialism as a whole has, and always will fail.
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball
All modern industrialized nations have some form of socialism. You can call chris Coons a socialist/communist all you want he's senator now so to bad.
raidergunz 1 year ago
@raidergunz We will vote Coons out in the next election. He will be just like Grayson. Gone in a flash. All Coons has to do is vote with Obama and we will get him just like the 66 we just got rid of. Wish I could be a fly on the wall when they pack their bags in December. I am sure they will have something negative to say about Obama and the end of their career. Thanks to Obama.... In 2012 we will reverse most of Obama's actions.
Bigmac8247 1 year ago
@Bigmac8247 I just hope we can do something good with this win, get this country on the right track, regaurdless of parties.
vsnips 1 year ago
@Bigmac8247 Yes but FDR, Clinton and others who had the midterms go against them still went on for a 2nd term.
WhoKnowsDenver 1 year ago
@arubberball First of all: What kind of communist will campaigned for a republican? Secondly, if you consider Hillary as a "social-liberal", well how do you explain her soft use of the realist framework - meaning prepare war, and don't start financial interdependence with country that are not trust-able?
Socialism lead to communist... Well, again no, for me it seem like a fallacy.I simply don't see how Lula Da Silva is linked to Ernst Bloch without independent pieces.
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule Apparently you didn't read the article I sent you about Coons, and his long history with socialist/communist groups. On the issue of Mrs. Clinton,"The Ends Justify The Means", no more needs to be said. Obama is quoted as saying Lula is, the most popular politician on earth. It's amazing we cannot drill for oil in the Gulf of Mexico, but Obama sends billions to Brazil, to just that, drill for oil. You should read Liberal Fascism, by Jonah Goldberg.
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball Liberal fascism...I read article at a "slightly" higher level in political science - like Langman or Huntingdon or Koser... So, when someone argue that the one in favor of increasing financial interdependence to increase peace, which is part of the liberal ideologies, have roote in a glorification of the state, racism and anti-communist by an irrational view (which is, ideologically, what Mussolini and Hitler were about), I just want to say "are you stupid, or you just don't know?".
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule (smiling) "slightly higher level in political science". We are done.
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball You know, I would agree that there is a form of corporatism taking place in america but... That does not really come from liberals as such. And that, even if the concentration of power in Washinton is alarming (army - executive - lobby - corporation being present and making choice of being over the equilibrium point of social cost and social benefit for military), it is not as near than during the Mussolini era - in other word, it is shit but it did not hit the fan yet.
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule Your right its doesn't come from liberals so much. What worries me, and it should give you pause is,progressive( Bush is a progressive, as well as Obama, they both have the same goals) masquerading as, liberal democrats, and moderate/compassionate republicans. Hitler, and Mussolini were satisfied with fascism at the national level. Where communism desires world authority. I am currently reading, Road to Serfdom now.
arubberball 1 year ago
@arubberball Yeap, someone might have to "sue" them one day for false representation... At the same time you will not catch me say that Bush or Obama as progressive - in some really odd ways, Robert Borden was more progressive than Bush and even if Borden was in obligation to be more progressive than what he ought, this is really not a good example of political reform or civil liberties...
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule I'd point out that corporations on average do much better under democrats than republicans. Up to you to figure out what that statistic means though.
Seravat7 1 year ago
@Seravat7 Right now, they speak about a structural problem for me.
therrydicule 1 year ago
@therrydicule I'm not sure what you mean by that. Is that one of those terms that alludes to people getting fired? Like "restructuring"?
Seravat7 1 year ago
These guys were telling it just how it is.
O'Donnell & Angle were just too honest to get through - lets see how the rest will cope when they have to take real decisions with consequences.
chissiez1 1 year ago
11/02/2010 the House got cleaned! Pelosi officially got her walking papers! Understand that issue Bill Maher!
decisionview 1 year ago
Oh so this video is for teabagger trailer trash hicks
Uniteme 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"may you live in interesting times"
indeed.
When are the liberals going to learn it is never wise to poke and prod the most well armed, disenfranchised, demographic of this nation?
PrepSurvivor 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"may you live in interesting times"
indeed.
When are the liberals going to learn it is never wise to poke and prod the most well armed, disenfranchised, demographic of this nation?
PrepSurvivor 1 year ago
"may you live in interesting times"
indeed.
When are the liberals going to learn it is never wise to poke and prod the most well armed, disenfranchised, demographic of this nation?
PrepSurvivor 1 year ago
"may you live in interesting times"
indeed.
When are the liberals going to learn it is never wise to poke and prod the most well armed, pissed off demographic of this nation?
PrepSurvivor 1 year ago
We love our country, our God and maybe they don't get it when they see a map of America thats solid red except for the west coast and New England. they can't deal with it! losers!
IEALES2 1 year ago
Losers.
VerbotenDingleberry 1 year ago
Bill Maher is scary. Everyone who disagrees with him is stupid? I wonder where this sliding to the right and to the left is going to collide? "May you live in interesting times."
WECantThink 1 year ago
Hooray for tax cuts and deregulation for corporate america. The right's message to the US is "Government sucks. Every man for himself!"
pyrite13 1 year ago
THESE are the elite left, who think we are all, too stupid too govern ourselves.............. because anyone who thinks would believe them, really are, too stupid to govern themselves.
cowgirlmoon 1 year ago
I was a big supporter of Ron Paul until about 3 years ago when a lot of racists people started joining this thing called the Tea Party.
I remember when Bush was in office and it was just a few of us out there supporting some of the Tea Party views but I stepped aside when things took a ugly turn. Of-course I'm in Colorado so the Tea Party may have had this kinda following in other states.
It just really upsets me so much that so many in the party are very racists.
heavenscentmmj 1 year ago
The elections just confirmed what they said ...... AMERICANS ARE NUTS, NO QUESTION. THEY REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ARE DOING. EMOTIONAL SPOILED CHILDISH KIDS WHO BELIEVE IN A WIZARD OF OZ WORLD IN WHICH THE PROBLEMS THEY CAUSED (CREDIT CARD DEBY = #1 BUSINESS IN THE US, WITH CRIMINAL PREMIUMS AND LOANS) ARE TURNING BACK AGAINST THEM AND THEY WANT TO SOLVE THEM WITH A MAGIC WAND, WHICH HISTORICALLY NEVER WORKED (TAX CUTS FOR THE RICH, CORPORATISM). AMERICA DESERVES TO BE IN A RECESSION.
MrFreedomdemocracy 1 year ago
@MrFreedomdemocracy
You'll never get it. Stop trying...
VerbotenDingleberry 1 year ago
NOBODY CARES WHAT msLSD THINKS, BECAUSE THEY HAVE BEEN FLUSHED DOWN THE TOILET, JUST LIKE ALL THE OTHER LIBBIE CRAP.
3martijns 1 year ago
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA... hows that hope & change shit going now? BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... liberal asswipes!!
DULDEN85 1 year ago
Look what stupid people did,
happypuppy1011 1 year ago
Whoot! Big Win. sorry Bill. :) On to 2012 !!
4thtothe4th 1 year ago
I love how liberals think that they are so smart. And if you listen to for example schiff radio he gets question about FED, gold standard, regulations... most of the liberal idiots don't know what the FED is.
Voy2378 1 year ago
@Voy2378
and most conservative idiots do?
jigggerwhat 1 year ago
@jigggerwhat
Yes, ever since Beck is on the air... :)
Voy2378 1 year ago
that teabagger tsunami was more like Glenn BeKKK farting in the kiddie pool...
milesy49 1 year ago 2
The Tea Party = Brainless Twits
MakingOpportunities 1 year ago 2
Nice job of presenting only the conclusions here, and not the facts and analyses that preceded them.
Panglos 1 year ago
@Panglos
"facts and analyses that preceded them" thats a good joke.
MrCBRIDD 1 year ago
@Panglos Garafolo says beingRepublican is a mental disorder;Maher feels the same way if you disagree over Global Warming or Religion;no analysis would justify their arrogance.
mrbriscoe2001 1 year ago
WHAT YOUR HEARING RIGHT NOW IS 'ELITISM'! THEY THINK THEY ARE BETTER THAN ALL OF YOU.
dobberdoss 1 year ago
BILL MAHER, THE SAME MORON WHO THINKS 2 PLANES CAN ACTUALLY DESTROY 3 BUILDINGS AND 2 OTHER PLANES CAN COMPLETELY EVAPORATE
dobberdoss 1 year ago
Who exactly are they talking about "specifically"? Tea baggers? Repugs? Progressives? Liberals? OR ALL AMERICANS?
IF ITS THE LATTER, then i say "nice way to knock your own people and convince us via INSULTS that you really care"!
Bill Maher, WHO THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? YOU ARROGANT REPUGNANT ASSHOLE!
dobberdoss 1 year ago
@dobberdoss Maher was talking about you and I think that he just about nailed it.
chissiez1 1 year ago
Their a 100% right.
Chrisltd1 1 year ago
@Chrisltd1 uhmm.maybe,with your misspelling,THEY'RE referring to you..
mrbriscoe2001 1 year ago
The sad thing is the voter fraud and voter buying is keeping these animals in power.
cozyfoxstudio 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thses people are pathetic. It is sickening
cozyfoxstudio 1 year ago
I AGREE WITH EVERYTHING THEY SAID IN THIS VIDEO! AND YOU WILL ALL SEE WHEN YOUR REPUBLICAN HOUSE FAILS HORRIBLY!
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 thank you!
henrik1905 1 year ago
@henrik1905 your welcome! They don't understand that it was Bush who got us into this mess with 2 wars that were not needed and the crash of wall street with the lack of regulation. But since Obama can't fix the 8 years of mess in 2 they vote the people who want LESS regulaton back in! ARE YO UKIDDING ME??? HOW DUMB DO YOU HAVE TO BE??? I don't get it I really don't they need to learn how to search for answers and not take everything Faux News says seriously. RAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 You must be one of those illegals and now you might not get to ever vote or become a citizen the CRACKER-JACK BOX way!!!!
Lou20290 1 year ago
@Lou20290 u merst beez an allegals i say derrr uze gotza teh werd spahnish een urss naimss. SLAP YOURSELF YOU FOOL! You know illegal immigration is not anything new right? NATIVE AMERICANS called it white people you IDIOT! Payback is a ish huh? Now I would suggest that you actually learn to think with a logical rational mind. That is impossible for the right to do though because if you did you would be a liberal. An Atheist liberal the best thing to ever happen to America and needs to be more.
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 SCREW YOU YOU LIBERAL DIRTBAG...WE COULD PUT ALL YOU LIBTURDS IN A BAG AND THROW YOU OVERBOARD AND YOU WOULD STILL COME TO THE TOP BECAUSE SHIT FLOATS.....
Lou20290 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 i know right. bill maher is such a genius compared to anyone on the right, and he actually has a pretty good point when he calls the people dumb. it's like they don't know what's good for them and they don't give a sh-- about the people around them in the world
henrik1905 1 year ago
@henrik1905 now i know you are really dumb--thinking bill maher is a genuis...he doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground and you probably don't either---like I said if you are so concerned for the terrorists go over there and sign up for their suicide mission......
Lou20290 1 year ago
@Lou20290 you think i support the suicide bombers? no, i support the civilians of iraq, afghanistan and iran who are being raped by america because of twenty muslims flying some airplanes into some building. is it just me or is that kinda fucked up?
henrik1905 1 year ago
@Lou20290 and if you've watched religilous you have to know that bill maher is a genius, and he is brave for standing up to the crazy religious people like he does
henrik1905 1 year ago
@henrik1905 It really is pointless to have a serious debate with him. Try to have some fun with his mind. Own it and watch him run in circles like a good right wing loon. It's really sad when their most known faces are Sarah Palin and Christine O'Donnell...Pretty much self explanatory of the Republican party.
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 yeah, right wing loons are right below dogs when it comes to iq. and i know, it's like they keep throwing those retarded "good" looking female politicians just to seem like they're down with civil rights
henrik1905 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 FUCK YOU YOU LIBERAL TRAITOR TO AMERICA AND I BELIEVE I WILL TURN YOUR YOUTUBE NAME AS A TERRORIST FOR THE TALIBAN...........
Lou20290 1 year ago
@Lou20290 Also it is proven that Atheist Liberals have higher IQ's on average then Religious Republicans. To that I reply DUUUUUUUHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhh. You are incapable of seeing this and I feel sorry for you because it is a problem with your brain that keeps you from having critical thinking abilities. In the perfect America Atheist would be the majority and everyone would have health care. But as long as the R(everse) are around that is going to be very hard to do. SarahPalinChristineO'donellLOL!
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 HANG ON TO THOSE IRRATIONAL THOUGHTS OF YOURS BECAUSE YOU WILL NEED THEM IN HELL!!!! HA HA ENJOY YOUR TIME THERE BECAUSE IT IS FOR ALL ETERNITY....NOW DON'T BOTHER ME ANYMORE BECAUSE YOU ARE BEGINNING TO BORE ME.....
Lou20290 1 year ago
@Lou20290 HAHA hell doesn't exist buddy. Did you know that when you die it's just like before you were born? and your body just rots in the ground and you are forgotten like 99.9% of the people before you? there is no heaven, this life is not a waiting room, and we are all going to die. And one day Earth will not exist anymore. But you cling to your bible and pray to your god. I'm sure he is as real to you as air is, but the difference is you can live without one of them. Humans created God.
SpaNisHLOV3 1 year ago
@SpaNisHLOV3 AND KEEP TELLING YOURSELF THAT ONE TOO!!!WHAT AN IDIOT YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lou20290 1 year ago