The problem with onagers is flaming ammo is too inaccurate to do much damage and regular ammo is too weak to do much damage. A regular rock can only knock out like 5 guys, flaming ones can knock out 20 but barely hit.
Eastern Infantry are pretty bad. I playing as Armenia (yay mods!) and they're fodder. I usually use them to bleed the enemy white: take and deal as many casualties as possible before they rout because they WILL rout. If you get blacksmith and temple upgrades they're better because they're cheap and there is a lot in a unit, but the basic units aren't as good as Hillmen, Heavy Spearmen, or Armenian Legionaries. Still, numbers are nice, especially during sieges.
@theking9macedon yea i was good vs all the eastern factions i took over all of the middle east and some parts of east russia then the romans betrayed me and i got raped cuz their infantry sucks giraffe dick
hillmen may have better morale and better attack (could be defense?) but eastern infantry have so many men in each unit it basically cancels each other out. Personally i'd always go for hillmen
wow, you went as PARTHIA? Damn. I hate the Parthians like hell. Only their cavalry is any good (okay, it IS pretty good) but their infantry is SHITE. At least you outnumber him massively in cavalry. Hopefully you can put in a lot of hammer-and-nail strikes into his legionary cohorts. Lucky thing he spent much of his money on some really bad onager-catapults. IDIOT ROME-GUY
@DaviesMotionPictures Lol, romans always used onagers; furthermore, it's only horrible in the game, and stop insulting the man. Maybe he was just having a bad day. He's facing PrinceofMacedon; perhaps he was trying a new technique?
Onagers are not a good tactic in regular map battles. Onagers are only good in siege, really. Even if you ARE good at maneuvering them normally, if you have infantry vs infantry, you usually take out the same amount of YOUR infantry as you do the enemies. Some people think they're intimidating, though, so they could be a good intimidation factor... Whatever. You owned by the way.
If you can safely get them around and lay daon so flanking fire I image that they would be affective but I can't see how you can do that against a moblie opponent
Please learn to type properly. It's extremely hard to flank with onagers because they're so slow. Just ditch them unless you are besieging or the enemy has tons of infantry.
the strategy is to weaken down the enemy with horse archers then engage them with your infantry. have your infantry hold them for just a moment then sweep your cavalry and hammer and anvil the enemy ive beat the campaign easily with parthia i can massacre roman legionaries using this strategy
@dos1698 well first you attack your best against his best (route the general), attack in greater numbers with East infantry, than use cataphract charges for backup against roman infantry and the onagers, rather simple.
This place looked like Teutoberger Wald... But the battle could have been his if he flanked you at the woods and protected himself from the cataphracts at the end. Sorry if I am off with the strategy, I have never played Rome: Total War.
I dont mean to offend, but i find it strange that you can take the game so lightly, but when someone makes a joke about your pronunciation, *cough* Jrv *cough*, you completely bash him and his comment...I didnt like his response afterward, but still, it was just simple pronunciation...with all due respect, lighten up!
i find in an open battle the only thing you need is like 3 units of war elephants and the rest cataphracts unfortunetly their both expensive units so their best unit is persian cavalry
Parthians are what remained of the Persian empire. they are an eastern faction who rely on Strong cavalry and horse archers to win. they have weak infantry who defeated the romans at the battle of Carrhae.
They were an Iranian nomad people living east of the Caspian Sea, who established themselves in North-Eastern Persia in about 240 and conquered the lands east of Anatolia/Levant from the Seleukids once the Seleukid Empire started to crumble (from about 170BC onwards).
((At the years 270BC they were *not* living in Iran as vanilla R:TW would have you believe))
Why do people use onagers? They suck, plain and simple. The regular rock attack is very weak and the fire attack is very inaccurate, you just can't win with them! They can do some damage against a heavy infantry army from afar on a hill map. Pretty specific criteria...
artillery is nice when you have 4 of them and have them placed on high ground. nice in high-money games Vs highly upgraded infantry. btw, onagers should at least have 3 bronze chevrons to be accurate. he only could have 1 attack upgrade or 1 chevron. that is way not enough. gg
I take nothing away from POM but the Roman player was terrible. First, why would you take artillery against Parthia? Their strength is cav not heavy inf formations. Money would have been better spent on more inf. and archers. The archers would have hurt his eastern inf. and more roman inf. could have done better against the Cataphracts.
To reply to erevos111, The other player used a VERY basic and VERY risky strategy. He depended on the Onagers to demolish the infantry and cavalry before he could reach the units. Thats were it all fell apart.
What went wrong here for the Romans. I understand the cataphracts had the advantage over the Roman cavalry, but the Roman infantry should have routed the light armored Persian infantry. I would expect that the battle woulf be determined by the cataphracts with the Parthian infantry barely holding the line with heavy casualties
the light infantry beat them because there were too many of them to handle for the romans and with the cataphract at the rear they would eventualy rout or die
ok, im sorry but before anyone has a go at me for bein homophobic or smthin there is something seriously rong with men who go to war in pink dressing gowns with flowers on em.
Those Eastern Infantry look fun. I'm gonna get RTW in a few years when I have a better PC, and the Parthians look fun to play with, 'specially the Eastern Infantry.
Their pink because the Romans laugh and think their girls. And the get ownd. That's how he won.
iFunnky 1 month ago
but i think there was no enemy...
bernulaci 1 month ago
Parthia is the best.
Mimsishere 1 month ago
POM epicness surrounds you
looper7853 1 month ago
Jeez! He won with what has to be one of the worst factions in the game!
Imjetta7 1 month ago
pom always wins
1tristonred 2 months ago
How the FUCK!, did you win.
Ohh yeah its P.O.M.
jonah92861 2 months ago
jeez, why EASTERN INFANTRY??
MagicMr007 2 months ago
i stopped watching ur videos, there to addicting
europeanGOD 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Η ήττα του ελληνικού εχθρού 2
Συνδεδεμένοι πιόνι της ελληνικής εχθρούς, Πρίγκιπα της Μακεδονίας, δεν είναι καν Μακεδόνας, έχασε τον πόλεμο:)))
Rome total War Online: PrinceofMacedon β Έκτορας watch?v=zyqAJwaLEcE
GreekVibratoren 4 months ago
so is there any kind of phalanx that can stop a charge from cataphracts??
T0YR1ST4SGR 5 months ago
@T0YR1ST4SGR Spartans can.
DesertTempest 4 months ago
The Parthian people had never troops infantry
Juanbarba 6 months ago
@Juanbarba actually they did, but they prefered to use their cavalry, sometimes they'd have all-cavalry armies
puchy110 6 months ago
Man, PrinceofMacedon rules.
I'm having some troubles here with my rome, but i will play online soon.
Congratulations from Brazil.
=P
TheRonalducho 7 months ago 4
The problem with onagers is flaming ammo is too inaccurate to do much damage and regular ammo is too weak to do much damage. A regular rock can only knock out like 5 guys, flaming ones can knock out 20 but barely hit.
Recruitsoldier 7 months ago
LoL. Pink soldiers ftw
iwingkitli86 7 months ago
why do people always use romans
ps3gamewizz 7 months ago
@ps3gamewizz It is called ROME total war. How dare people use rome in a game called rome total war!
fromdirttodustpro1 4 months ago
@ps3gamewizz
because roman infanty are great in close quarters combat in game and in real life
Leonidas19981 3 months ago
beginning, Prince: These guys suck but they have cool pink outfits! LOL!
TheFlippy315 7 months ago 13
Pink and Deadly!
ToastedWafflez 7 months ago
3 mins of advancing 1 minut of ownage ;D
NutsMathijsNuts 7 months ago
Onagers do very well against large numbers of units. The armies of both sides were too small for them to be useful in this battle
midgetydeath 7 months ago
man,artillery really sucks in RTW
HerasBoss 8 months ago
@HerasBoss
But the good part about RTW is that they have a couple more units defending
rugrat646 7 months ago
Lol Onagers.
sasquatch268 8 months ago
prefer hillmen to eastern infantry, they seem to stand their ground more lol
TalonMercenary 9 months ago
2:41 "First blood"!
faiz196 9 months ago
DAAAAAMMMNNNN i cant find this game anywhere it pisses me off
Dstyle819 9 months ago
@Dstyle819 piratebay..........
faiz196 9 months ago
@faiz196 you can't play onlline when playing a pirated game...
brammatie2 8 months ago
@Dstyle819 amazon, steam etc
TalonMercenary 9 months ago
@Dstyle819 try amazon just bought it for under £5
TheJoyboy99 8 months ago
@Dstyle819 amazon.com
Graveguard1992 7 months ago
Do u do campiagns?
farmerz245 10 months ago
was your voice just deep back then or were you sick or something?
michelthegreatable 10 months ago
You can literally type in any faction combo and PoM will have a vid on it.
stingray970 11 months ago
If he hadnt brought onagers he might have won.
excandersham 11 months ago
Onagers are still a risky foe, I mean I had my 10 star general killed in the battle because a fireball hit him, right in the beginning of the fight:p
Guitarvirtuoso666 11 months ago
yes the parthian outfits are nice,i love playing as parthia and watch my units kill everything in there pink pyjamas
BladeOfParthia 11 months ago
@BladeOfParthia ROFL
Hadzibg 11 months ago
what a noob
RoyalMcKeogh 1 year ago
do people still play this online
TheSilentKilla123 1 year ago
@TheSilentKilla123 yep
Lostcausexx 1 year ago
yea catafracts rock!!!
fostieris02 1 year ago
parthia infantry suck. They got good selection of cavalary though.
M1tchy0306 1 year ago
Wanne fight me on rtw?
I'm good in 1 vs 1 fights.
partyboy3460 1 year ago
Onagers are ONLY good for taking over towns quickly.
grawling 1 year ago
i can only say W T F??!! to the roman players army
TheRoopeKonna 1 year ago
wow
TheMihnea61912 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you owned him!!!!
dirkwelhuis1 1 year ago
Eastern Infantry are pretty bad. I playing as Armenia (yay mods!) and they're fodder. I usually use them to bleed the enemy white: take and deal as many casualties as possible before they rout because they WILL rout. If you get blacksmith and temple upgrades they're better because they're cheap and there is a lot in a unit, but the basic units aren't as good as Hillmen, Heavy Spearmen, or Armenian Legionaries. Still, numbers are nice, especially during sieges.
puffthemagicbison 1 year ago
@puffthemagicbison i like to have like 3 as armenia online since my army is mostly cav and like 5 heavy spears
wowhobbster666 1 year ago
i hate parthia.....they suck
theking9macedon 1 year ago
@theking9macedon yea i was good vs all the eastern factions i took over all of the middle east and some parts of east russia then the romans betrayed me and i got raped cuz their infantry sucks giraffe dick
zZG3n0ciDeZz 1 year ago
@zZG3n0ciDeZz haha good 1
theking9macedon 1 year ago
Brave move using Parthia with no horse archers good vid POM
ellisduey 1 year ago
onagers are shit unless they hit you with a fire shot which against a small army is unlikely. he'd have been better of with more cav
kalashnikov96 1 year ago
look at their legs
fightwarriorshadow 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
your videos are awesome
MrLotrfan 1 year ago
you videos are awesome
MrLotrfan 1 year ago
i like watching your videos they are awesome
MrLotrfan 1 year ago
i hate phalexes i like the romans better
Elltaf 1 year ago
hillmen may have better morale and better attack (could be defense?) but eastern infantry have so many men in each unit it basically cancels each other out. Personally i'd always go for hillmen
TalonMercenary 1 year ago
lol who put a red sock in the kkk suits :D
askme123789 1 year ago
Hey PrinceofMacedon.... You bought this game or did you download for free?
GliderPilot07 1 year ago
@GliderPilot07
he bought the game and all of its expansions. he shows the cases in one of his videos
rkhale02 1 year ago
the infantry's faces look like mario (parthia) lol
Achilles9091 1 year ago
the hammer and anvil tacic
terminiaterc 1 year ago
For the Parthians you picked a very strange army..
Most ppl. bring cavalry archers
rienie13 1 year ago
300
chickenfinger90 1 year ago
didn't the other guy know that enabling the onager's special ability makes it less accurate against troops? as if onagers weren't inaccurate enough.
bboyKevz 1 year ago
worlds shortest poem : adam had'em
hermit354 1 year ago
i think he could of won if his romans didnt turn they're backs to the enemy
dirt0bike00 1 year ago
cana anyone tell me how he switch to mace attack plz reply !
nikola4honorable 1 year ago
@nikola4honorable usally it does it automaticly but if not ALT + 2
CallumMeg 1 year ago
how do you do a mace attack
napoleon99100 1 year ago
hey do you still play?
musicman5576 1 year ago
Pajama men FTW!!!
NmanXwantedX 1 year ago
doesn't have High Quality
Pertinaziuos 1 year ago
prince do u still play because im getting rtw in 3 days i was wondering if we can play together online ill comment my name if u want
captinreex 1 year ago
wow, you went as PARTHIA? Damn. I hate the Parthians like hell. Only their cavalry is any good (okay, it IS pretty good) but their infantry is SHITE. At least you outnumber him massively in cavalry. Hopefully you can put in a lot of hammer-and-nail strikes into his legionary cohorts. Lucky thing he spent much of his money on some really bad onager-catapults. IDIOT ROME-GUY
DaviesMotionPictures 1 year ago
@DaviesMotionPictures Infantry isnt that important in low money archers and cav are
MrUnclepeanuts 1 year ago
@DaviesMotionPictures Lol, romans always used onagers; furthermore, it's only horrible in the game, and stop insulting the man. Maybe he was just having a bad day. He's facing PrinceofMacedon; perhaps he was trying a new technique?
faveology 1 year ago
how do u rotate ur troops before the battle starts
garrettwitcher 1 year ago
how do you use the mace attack
sujoyabc123 1 year ago
@sujoyabc123 Press ALT
mopedman1 1 year ago
Wow you use the Parthian Iranian forces very well. They did prove to be one of Rome's most feared opponents.
ClearMindedOne 1 year ago
why do people refuse to use horseback archers? their great
eidius1989 1 year ago
@eidius1989 Not really for online battles. :P - They aren't cost effective.
devons1ck 1 year ago
prince of macedon you are the biggest asshole dishonest liar i have ever seen
prosocutorism 1 year ago
@prosocutorism why?
selucianova 1 year ago
lolz he sounds high in this commentary
CarthagoMaximus 1 year ago
what he needs is elephants
bull1hippy 1 year ago
hm why should he use archers or slingers, when he has Catraphacts.
Chalenge1 2 years ago
u played parthians without archer or slinger?
c1v1carg 2 years ago
Wow, he really used onagers, what an idiot.
MJK1ng0fP0p 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
funny how a war of about 100000 people takes about 60 secs?
greywolfdog1 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
are you sick or something because youre talking reall slowly
jagc1998 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
C'est un noob l'autre :/
Lenron01 2 years ago
lol 4 onager...
MarkVll 2 years ago 29
Dan94 red if he is a fag then y do u watch his videos hmm
ghpruz 2 years ago
when you were marching towards him and the onagers were firing zoomed in on the front line with slow motion wouldve been epic
Sykezdabest 2 years ago
wow do u ever lose
kamakaze7 2 years ago
genraly i use eastern infantry as cannon fodder, because they can resist light or medium cavaly charges much better than peasents
hubcapproductions 2 years ago
parthian shot really deadly
emhot20 2 years ago 5
Eastern Infantry are only a step above Roman Town Watch lol.
mkailov13 2 years ago 42
town watch could probably beat em, if they had light updgrades
slightlyinsane25 2 years ago
lol they basically are town watch except they are better against cavalry
HufflepuffTheGreat 2 years ago
@mkailov13
Yeah, they have 120 against 80
TheRoopeKonna 1 year ago
Onagers are not a good tactic in regular map battles. Onagers are only good in siege, really. Even if you ARE good at maneuvering them normally, if you have infantry vs infantry, you usually take out the same amount of YOUR infantry as you do the enemies. Some people think they're intimidating, though, so they could be a good intimidation factor... Whatever. You owned by the way.
slightlyinsane25 2 years ago 2
If you can safely get them around and lay daon so flanking fire I image that they would be affective but I can't see how you can do that against a moblie opponent
thepunictrader 2 years ago
Please learn to type properly. It's extremely hard to flank with onagers because they're so slow. Just ditch them unless you are besieging or the enemy has tons of infantry.
slightlyinsane25 2 years ago
@slightlyinsane25 true and additionaly even if you flank them they are as liable to kill your infantry a they are to kill enemy
sushanalone 2 years ago
Onagers really good in high elevation battles too
MrUnclepeanuts 2 years ago
true that
slightlyinsane25 2 years ago
uhh parthian eastern infantry suck ass,im not even gonna comment a strategy on this one cus i hate them so much.how did you win,i dont understand!!!!
dos1698 2 years ago
i know i hate parthia they suck but, i have to give it to PrinceofMacedon he knows how to lead army an use tactics and terrain to his advantage.
TimiHendrix195 2 years ago
the strategy is to weaken down the enemy with horse archers then engage them with your infantry. have your infantry hold them for just a moment then sweep your cavalry and hammer and anvil the enemy ive beat the campaign easily with parthia i can massacre roman legionaries using this strategy
wbdix13 2 years ago
Their outfits are full of awesome,
DMBHawk 2 years ago
@dos1698 well first you attack your best against his best (route the general), attack in greater numbers with East infantry, than use cataphract charges for backup against roman infantry and the onagers, rather simple.
skydome29 2 years ago
This place looked like Teutoberger Wald... But the battle could have been his if he flanked you at the woods and protected himself from the cataphracts at the end. Sorry if I am off with the strategy, I have never played Rome: Total War.
thewhoopersnapper35 2 years ago
If he didnt waste all that money on the Onagers he would have had a larger force, he relied to much on them in that battle, good game though.
Illier1 2 years ago
@Illier1 an roman archer and legion infantry unit would have served his opponent alot better
skydome29 2 years ago
He failed to protect his flanks...
RollandB 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
your a fag
dan94red15 2 years ago
dan94fred15 and your a bitch your point is?
MrUnclepeanuts 2 years ago
nice battle and i think the eastern infantry look like they r wearing pajarmas lol
lloyd1234100 2 years ago 3
i mean in the real war
Afglalala 2 years ago
Sometimes they did but mostly they lost
kakhi2008 2 years ago
what a shame lol
i mean they wont wars against russia, GB, and defeated arabs n greeks how come they couldnt win from rome?
Afglalala 2 years ago
did the parthians win or not?
Afglalala 2 years ago
using onagers vs infantry it was doomd to fail nice battle realy short but nice
333sucks333 2 years ago
the rome guy lost because his initial formation fails
bchgh 2 years ago
I dont mean to offend, but i find it strange that you can take the game so lightly, but when someone makes a joke about your pronunciation, *cough* Jrv *cough*, you completely bash him and his comment...I didnt like his response afterward, but still, it was just simple pronunciation...with all due respect, lighten up!
Slavman24 2 years ago
i find in an open battle the only thing you need is like 3 units of war elephants and the rest cataphracts unfortunetly their both expensive units so their best unit is persian cavalry
vallecaucano114 2 years ago
Parthians are what remained of the Persian empire. they are an eastern faction who rely on Strong cavalry and horse archers to win. they have weak infantry who defeated the romans at the battle of Carrhae.
Beatlesfan87 2 years ago 4
Where are Parthians from?
billboi92 2 years ago
They were an Iranian nomad people living east of the Caspian Sea, who established themselves in North-Eastern Persia in about 240 and conquered the lands east of Anatolia/Levant from the Seleukids once the Seleukid Empire started to crumble (from about 170BC onwards).
((At the years 270BC they were *not* living in Iran as vanilla R:TW would have you believe))
UserNameForYeeTube 2 years ago
Okay thankyou!
billboi92 2 years ago
PoM spent more time walking to the enemy than he spent defeating him. Lol.
sampj13 2 years ago 4
he prince of macedon if there were 4 squadrons of naked fanatics vs 4 triyi who would win.
thejthaas 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
try it your self
gigioneumatica 2 years ago
Try out yourself in an offline battle I would say.
KbzIvvo 2 years ago
good use of the right words like pila or pilum
boogins5432 2 years ago
If you are playing parthia you should use horse archers and surround the enemy units. you'll have minimum losses.
illopos 2 years ago
most online games restrict horse archers to 2 units.
maximuslaurius 2 years ago
i played 200 total battles and about 2 had that rule
EHEHEHEOIL 2 years ago
Those parthian infantryman look fruity :)
clonecomanderfox 2 years ago 7
Why do people use onagers? They suck, plain and simple. The regular rock attack is very weak and the fire attack is very inaccurate, you just can't win with them! They can do some damage against a heavy infantry army from afar on a hill map. Pretty specific criteria...
SRSpOoK 2 years ago
artillery is nice when you have 4 of them and have them placed on high ground. nice in high-money games Vs highly upgraded infantry. btw, onagers should at least have 3 bronze chevrons to be accurate. he only could have 1 attack upgrade or 1 chevron. that is way not enough. gg
romanphoenix999 2 years ago
PAJAMA PARTY
yoohoocan1 2 years ago 44
I take nothing away from POM but the Roman player was terrible. First, why would you take artillery against Parthia? Their strength is cav not heavy inf formations. Money would have been better spent on more inf. and archers. The archers would have hurt his eastern inf. and more roman inf. could have done better against the Cataphracts.
mindcrime2001 2 years ago 6
you're amazing, you never lose, every time i watch your videos you pull yourself out of the toughest situations, kudos to you man
Penglens 2 years ago 7
He did lose a few times, but after 2 years of playing this game that happens rarely.
Prodigyexam12 2 years ago 4
and the times he did lose it was because he was playing a "friendly" game. Hes REALLY good at this game
josh96321 2 years ago 4
Rome got OWNED! hahaha
To reply to erevos111, The other player used a VERY basic and VERY risky strategy. He depended on the Onagers to demolish the infantry and cavalry before he could reach the units. Thats were it all fell apart.
TorontoSHARP 2 years ago 3
good video. huray parthians
jamalak74u 2 years ago
to beat rome with parthias poor eastern infantry makes u an excellent player man .
well done
adnankab 2 years ago
The onagers fired into the air
as parthians advanced with no care
Crushed the romans like a stick
They were pretty thick
My roman poem
darkforest0113 2 years ago 41
@darkforest0113 nice
KingFire62796 1 year ago
@darkforest0113 the purple and silver clashed with red untill every single roman was dead
getarplya 1 year ago
The Cataphracts charge owns legions
OTDDragon 2 years ago 4
What went wrong here for the Romans. I understand the cataphracts had the advantage over the Roman cavalry, but the Roman infantry should have routed the light armored Persian infantry. I would expect that the battle woulf be determined by the cataphracts with the Parthian infantry barely holding the line with heavy casualties
erevos111 2 years ago
the light infantry beat them because there were too many of them to handle for the romans and with the cataphract at the rear they would eventualy rout or die
ostrogoth182 2 years ago
ok, im sorry but before anyone has a go at me for bein homophobic or smthin there is something seriously rong with men who go to war in pink dressing gowns with flowers on em.
hatmonkey6 2 years ago
says you from 2300 years in the future
dr4g0nt4nk3r 2 years ago 3
lol
hellojoeimcool 2 years ago
this is pretty cool, im downloading it right now says its gona take 40 min, but thats what you get when you buy online
biscut420 2 years ago
Prince look Im persian an I hate the greeks lol just kiding and btw I love your videos, you are a great technician.
persianpesar92 2 years ago
umm so u have problems with macedonians too?
dont joke about that
macedon1bc 2 years ago
Those Eastern Infantry look fun. I'm gonna get RTW in a few years when I have a better PC, and the Parthians look fun to play with, 'specially the Eastern Infantry.
Sporeman33 2 years ago
hey prince im now a top low money player like you whenver i tell people im macedonian they say its cool and ive played 35battles and won 33
macedon1bc 2 years ago