I arrived to this conclusion philosophically somehow, when contemplating the big bang and anti-matter. This idea is also described in William James Sidis's The Animate and the Inanimate. Somehow we feel compelled to acknowledge a possible reverse or opposite simultaneous universe which for now remains completely theoretical. Also, it seems to be connected with time in an opposite direction, so reverse entropy. Allowing Infinity. This concept of opposites coming from nothing was even thought of
There are only 4 forces (PERIOD), I will also [list] the force carrier (gauge bosons) that 'transmit' each force:
1 Gravity [Graviton]
2 Electromagnetism [Photon]
3 Strong nuclear force (holds quarks together) [Gluon]
4 Weak nuclear force ('transmutes' up quarks to down quarks and down to up to consequently transmute a proton to a neutron and vice versa) {W+ W- and Z0)
Time is something that man has created in reference to the rotation of the earth and its orbit around the sun. Before man, there was no time and after he is gone, there will be no more time. I cannot believe that we pay people like these to dream up theories and then proofs to show their versions of what they believe when it is totally useless in solving todays problems around the world!
@pbodymathis How very egocentric of you. People once said that only birds should fly and humans shouldn't move faster than on horseback. Where would we be in helping the world if we'd listened to them? This world is moving on and it's up to the individual whether they stay in the dark ages or embrace the future.
I thought no matter, including light, can escape the singularity of a blackhole because the escape velocity is at or great than the speed of light. But @ 0:26, the he says that time flows toward the singularity, thus making the matter inescapable. WTF?
@SovietBeatle1100 Fuck you, you are probably a 13 year squeaker who gets D's in all of your subjects but still thinks you are better then everyone else _|_
@AlphaStone792 Fuck you, you are probably a 13 year squeaker who gets D's in all of your subjects but still thinks you are better then everyone else _|_
time is a mental construct which we en masse have decided to experience.Time is real however it is not as valid as the true nature of time. wHich is eternal NOW
LOL@smartingamerica any fool is up to theoretical science. They state what ever they want as fact not having to prove a thing. Colleagues will think them a genius. Their colleagues don't understand a thing either; except they huddle and pretend they do. As long as whats being published follows certain guidlines, its cool. So get over yourself. The gig is up. As for time, it's intangible and nonexistant. It travels in one direction: future. And I don't even have a physics degree. LOL
time is an energy measure of duration between the exchange of cause and effect which is divided into stellar time the effects of light and gravity that can be measured chronomicly as days, months, and weeks and then there is absolute time which is cosmic time that can not be measured since it is relative to the dimensions of space and is infinitly divisible.
Past, present, and future are only perspectives of time, but do not indicate that time flows or moves. Spacetime has often been compared to a loaf of bread, where each slice represents all of space (or perhaps just a region of space) in one moment of time. What we see as the progression of time is really just our conscious mind moving seamlessly from slice to slice. So in all actuality, all moments of time exist simultaneously, we just experience them once at a time.
Past, present, and future are only perspectives of time, but do not indicate that time flows or moves. Spacetime has often been compared to a loaf of bread, where each slice represents all of space (or perhaps just a region of space) in one moment of time. What we see as the progression of time is really just our conscious mind moving seamlessly from slice to slice. So in all actuality, all moments of time exist simultaneously, we just experience them once at a time.
A particle is moving in free space,free space means there is nothing other than this particle. As usual this particle will move in constant velocity. We know that when particle moves displacement is also changing. But still velocity remains constant. We know that there must be something changing to remain velocity constant, when displacement is changing. What may be that........????
untrue. 'Device' implies that it has a goal which it doesn't. That's like saying evolution is a device to make a species better or a heart a device to pump blood. Alot of people make this mistake.
Wrong, if everything happened at once, there would still be a need for time because once is still a point in time, it is simply just events simultaneously located it the same point in time...
I see what you mean, but maybe you're a bit confused, or I am mis-understanding something. What I am saying is that time doesn't prevent everything from happening at once because:
If things happen at once, they are still in the realm of time, i.e they're in some frame of sequence
This is a rather pointless posting and an ironic waste of "TIME". Kip Thorne and Richard Feynman deserve better than this. Those guys DO have plenty to say about it, and "tooncast" gives them a few hundred words each? Disgraceful!
Stay out of physics, tooncast: you just aren't up to it.
Why criticize? All the guy did was put together a short video; he didn't claim that the secrets of the universe are contained within the video. Perhaps this video will inspire someone to look up what Feynman or Thorne had to say. Stop being so pretentious and self-important.
Look who's talking, from the back of his thought-police high-horse.
"All the guy did was put togerther a short video".
Yeah. A LOUSY one, ok?
Can I voice my opinion? Do you mind?
THE VIDEO was the subject here, bub. I'll include you as the subject now: your ad hominem remarks are as big a waste of time as this video is. Until you show where my criticism errs, you can take a hike. Knock it off.
I'm sure Tooncast is going to enlighten us all about his or her own nobel prize winning evidence on the nature of time. (forgot to do homework)
cameraperson 2 days ago
Thanks for this nanotube on Time about which we know nothing fondamental.
TheQFTheorist 1 month ago
What is this SHIT trying to imply?
sinachiniforoosh 2 months ago
Time is something that was wasted by my watching this video.
Frisbieinstein 3 months ago 5
*by Thales
SH10JogaBonito 4 months ago
@SH10JogaBonito
*by Thales
SH10JogaBonito 4 months ago
I arrived to this conclusion philosophically somehow, when contemplating the big bang and anti-matter. This idea is also described in William James Sidis's The Animate and the Inanimate. Somehow we feel compelled to acknowledge a possible reverse or opposite simultaneous universe which for now remains completely theoretical. Also, it seems to be connected with time in an opposite direction, so reverse entropy. Allowing Infinity. This concept of opposites coming from nothing was even thought of
SH10JogaBonito 4 months ago
Black holes are nonsense. The "event horizon" is the surface of a cold, rotating solid body.
hozayamz 4 months ago
@hozayamz Liar.
nilbud 4 months ago
@nilbud Weak minded.
hozayamz 4 months ago
Time is a force
13sam31 5 months ago
@13sam31
No, time is a dimension
There are only 4 forces (PERIOD), I will also [list] the force carrier (gauge bosons) that 'transmit' each force:
1 Gravity [Graviton]
2 Electromagnetism [Photon]
3 Strong nuclear force (holds quarks together) [Gluon]
4 Weak nuclear force ('transmutes' up quarks to down quarks and down to up to consequently transmute a proton to a neutron and vice versa) {W+ W- and Z0)
To think time is a force is ... asinine
mdma4life 4 months ago
@mdma4life Graviton hehehe. That's like saying "I don't know, so God did it"
Forseti6288 4 months ago
Time is just a concept we use for the perception of change.
Esoparagon 5 months ago
Time is something that man has created in reference to the rotation of the earth and its orbit around the sun. Before man, there was no time and after he is gone, there will be no more time. I cannot believe that we pay people like these to dream up theories and then proofs to show their versions of what they believe when it is totally useless in solving todays problems around the world!
pbodymathis 5 months ago
@pbodymathis How very egocentric of you. People once said that only birds should fly and humans shouldn't move faster than on horseback. Where would we be in helping the world if we'd listened to them? This world is moving on and it's up to the individual whether they stay in the dark ages or embrace the future.
DuTriDu 5 months ago
@DuTriDu What does that have to do with time...... other than wasting it........
pbodymathis 4 months ago
@pbodymathis That bang on the head was more serious than you think, go get it checked out.
nilbud 4 months ago
What is TIME ?.. Time is 5.53pm
burnercb1 6 months ago
I thought no matter, including light, can escape the singularity of a blackhole because the escape velocity is at or great than the speed of light. But @ 0:26, the he says that time flows toward the singularity, thus making the matter inescapable. WTF?
Things2doBeforeIdie 7 months ago
time is the set of all subsets when k=0 where k is defined as space, my definition as a russian mathematics and physics ph.d at MIT
SovietBeatle1100 8 months ago
@SovietBeatle1100 Fuck you, you are probably a 13 year squeaker who gets D's in all of your subjects but still thinks you are better then everyone else _|_
AlphaStone792 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlphaStone792 Fuck you, you are probably a 13 year squeaker who gets D's in all of your subjects but still thinks you are better then everyone else _|_
jobriq5 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SovietBeatle1100 [ stupid pseudo-physics comment] [ reasons why you should think I'm smart ] -- doesnt work
PhysicsMathMan 8 months ago
Goddamn, i want that stamp
thefastshuffle 8 months ago
Time is a sequence of system states.
FreddyFuFu 9 months ago
time is a mental construct which we en masse have decided to experience.Time is real however it is not as valid as the true nature of time. wHich is eternal NOW
rphcomposer 9 months ago
LOL@smartingamerica any fool is up to theoretical science. They state what ever they want as fact not having to prove a thing. Colleagues will think them a genius. Their colleagues don't understand a thing either; except they huddle and pretend they do. As long as whats being published follows certain guidlines, its cool. So get over yourself. The gig is up. As for time, it's intangible and nonexistant. It travels in one direction: future. And I don't even have a physics degree. LOL
fwilderone 11 months ago
Everyone knows what time is until they are asked to define it.
deedubya286 1 year ago
time is an energy measure of duration between the exchange of cause and effect which is divided into stellar time the effects of light and gravity that can be measured chronomicly as days, months, and weeks and then there is absolute time which is cosmic time that can not be measured since it is relative to the dimensions of space and is infinitly divisible.
doctorw2 1 year ago
What is time?
Baby I'm getting old
I'm getting old
No more
meteor4163 1 year ago
Thorne:Nothing can travel back in time. Feynman :every particle can go fowards or backwwards in time.
dasaint0 1 year ago
Time is awareness and perception. Of change and movement and thought. @pebsypete has it in a nutshell. Ha Ha.
dalli2 1 year ago
what does he say @ 00:59 ?
familyguyfreak3324 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Past, present, and future are only perspectives of time, but do not indicate that time flows or moves. Spacetime has often been compared to a loaf of bread, where each slice represents all of space (or perhaps just a region of space) in one moment of time. What we see as the progression of time is really just our conscious mind moving seamlessly from slice to slice. So in all actuality, all moments of time exist simultaneously, we just experience them once at a time.
HotSauce147 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Past, present, and future are only perspectives of time, but do not indicate that time flows or moves. Spacetime has often been compared to a loaf of bread, where each slice represents all of space (or perhaps just a region of space) in one moment of time. What we see as the progression of time is really just our conscious mind moving seamlessly from slice to slice. So in all actuality, all moments of time exist simultaneously, we just experience them once at a time.
HotSauce147 1 year ago
I think time has a lot more to do with statistical mechanics that with relativity (but that's just my op)
rm3cpp 1 year ago
My stupid thinking about Time is.........
A particle is moving in free space,free space means there is nothing other than this particle. As usual this particle will move in constant velocity. We know that when particle moves displacement is also changing. But still velocity remains constant. We know that there must be something changing to remain velocity constant, when displacement is changing. What may be that........????
I think it is Time......
Any problems?
skr786 2 years ago
@skr786 yea you are gay
benandtherest 1 year ago
@skr786 The problem is you haven't actually defined or explained anything.
tml4873 1 year ago
What is TIME?
TIME is a necessary device that prevents 'Everything' happening at ONCE.
pebsypete 2 years ago 18
@pebsypete Lol, I like your definition, my friend.
d34thguitarr 2 years ago
@pebsypete HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Laughing really hard! hahahahahahahahahaha
I'll quote that soon...
Raizdecimal 1 year ago
@pebsypete everything is happening at once related to the speed of light. And relative distance.
flamingangel999 10 months ago
@pebsypete nice, but its not what time is
british123able 9 months ago
@pebsypete
untrue. 'Device' implies that it has a goal which it doesn't. That's like saying evolution is a device to make a species better or a heart a device to pump blood. Alot of people make this mistake.
somethingonmyhip 8 months ago
@pebsypete for things to happen all at once it would need time. time allows things to happen. if there was no time things would not happen.
gangstakurv 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@pebsypete u smartass faggot. thats not an answer to the question
AAandries 7 months ago
@pebsypete That is true, but it also creates material reality by sequencing each of
the smallest measures of time like frames of pictures in a reel of motion
picture film, so that our senses and mind can comprehend the material
universe. Everything actually happens at once past, present and future.
fntime 6 months ago
@pebsypete
Wrong, if everything happened at once, there would still be a need for time because once is still a point in time, it is simply just events simultaneously located it the same point in time...
Musa3li 6 months ago
@Musa3li you basically just affirmed his statement in the attempt to contradict it.
jobriq5 6 months ago
@jobriq5
I see what you mean, but maybe you're a bit confused, or I am mis-understanding something. What I am saying is that time doesn't prevent everything from happening at once because:
If things happen at once, they are still in the realm of time, i.e they're in some frame of sequence
Musa3li 6 months ago
@pebsypete and i thought it wus a magazine :P
nextblain 5 months ago
@pebsypete This is a quotation from J. A. Wheeler.
reticulum78 5 months ago
@pebsypete Well it ain't workin' then is it
MurkMenthaa 3 months ago
@pebsypete quoting Einstein eh?At least mention it...
sinachiniforoosh 2 months ago
It is odd time is a measurement and a variable because we have time dilation.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
Huh? Nobel? Non-sequitur.
I didn't critize Thorne or Feynman at all.
I critized tooncast for reasons that are obvious to anybody who understands the subject, and it IS a valid criticism.
smartingamerica 2 years ago
Time doesn't exist.
SquirrelGott 2 years ago
time is a function of distance
SkeksisRule 2 years ago
@SquirrelGott ....right on---we humans have applied the value/concept of "time" to a moving universe---all there is , is moving parts of here...
syrupsap 1 year ago
@SquirrelGott without time, no event can occur.
x4xmen 1 year ago
This really is an example of the contradictions that exist between planetary-scale physics and atomic-scale "Quantum" physics.
BOTH scientists are right!
At least as we humans know so far.
What we don't know yet is WHY both ideas are right. What a hell of a riddle that is.
archedmandible 2 years ago
This is a rather pointless posting and an ironic waste of "TIME". Kip Thorne and Richard Feynman deserve better than this. Those guys DO have plenty to say about it, and "tooncast" gives them a few hundred words each? Disgraceful!
Stay out of physics, tooncast: you just aren't up to it.
smartingamerica 2 years ago 105
@smartingamerica
I suppose you are up for the Nobel yourself, eh?
Stay out of criticism, smartingamerica; you just aren't up to it.
DanHipp 2 years ago
Huh? Nobel? Non-sequitur.
I didn't critize Thorne or Feynman at all.
I critized tooncast for reasons that are obvious to anybody who understands the subject, and it IS a valid criticism.
smartingamerica 2 years ago
@smartingamerica
Why criticize? All the guy did was put together a short video; he didn't claim that the secrets of the universe are contained within the video. Perhaps this video will inspire someone to look up what Feynman or Thorne had to say. Stop being so pretentious and self-important.
DanHipp 2 years ago
"Why criticize"?
Are you kidding?
"Pretentious and self-important"?
Look who's talking, from the back of his thought-police high-horse.
"All the guy did was put togerther a short video".
Yeah. A LOUSY one, ok?
Can I voice my opinion? Do you mind?
THE VIDEO was the subject here, bub. I'll include you as the subject now: your ad hominem remarks are as big a waste of time as this video is. Until you show where my criticism errs, you can take a hike. Knock it off.
smartingamerica 2 years ago
@smartingamerica he has 12 more vids than you. so id say he has contributed 12 'times' the amount you have.
meatnug 2 months ago
@meatnug 12 X 0 = ? ;-)
myrtlebox 2 weeks ago