According to brane theory two branes touched or bumped into each other at a point and this was the singularity of the big bang.
However if we think of these two branes continuing to contact at an increasingly larger radius moving at a rate greater than the speed of light would this not explain how inflation occurred?
What if these branes are like soap bubbles and our universe is the contact surface of these two bubbles.
My name is Mark Maloney; I would like to invite you to visit my website Epluribusunum56. com. There you will find entirely new physics and cosmology, called Proto-space and DSFF, which are the formational mechanics composing all aspects composing our universe. The best way to learn something new is to securitize it looking for errors. I welcome your opinions.
I'm doing my masters in inflation, and I just had a long conversation with one of our cosmology staff at UCL. He claims that the Flatness Problem isn't a problem, that Ellis (of Hawking & Ellis fame) and others are dead set against the need for an explanation for the Flatness "Problem." His basic argument: the Universe remains flat, and DOES NOT diverge over cosmological time. So, no need for explanation. Though, obviously, inflation is required for primordial perturbations etc. Thoughts?
The big bang and inflation:
According to brane theory two branes touched or bumped into each other at a point and this was the singularity of the big bang.
However if we think of these two branes continuing to contact at an increasingly larger radius moving at a rate greater than the speed of light would this not explain how inflation occurred?
What if these branes are like soap bubbles and our universe is the contact surface of these two bubbles.
rad802 7 months ago
Comment removed
rad802 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Wonderers,
My name is Mark Maloney; I would like to invite you to visit my website Epluribusunum56. com. There you will find entirely new physics and cosmology, called Proto-space and DSFF, which are the formational mechanics composing all aspects composing our universe. The best way to learn something new is to securitize it looking for errors. I welcome your opinions.
Sincerely, Mark Maloney
MarkMaloney56 1 year ago
This subject just amazes me to no end...
Great post, thanks
1umbnonearth 1 year ago
I'm doing my masters in inflation, and I just had a long conversation with one of our cosmology staff at UCL. He claims that the Flatness Problem isn't a problem, that Ellis (of Hawking & Ellis fame) and others are dead set against the need for an explanation for the Flatness "Problem." His basic argument: the Universe remains flat, and DOES NOT diverge over cosmological time. So, no need for explanation. Though, obviously, inflation is required for primordial perturbations etc. Thoughts?
simonpjhall 1 year ago
Comment removed
HarshColby 11 months ago
isotopes of H & He & a few of Li
peaceiscontagious 2 years ago
Have to disagre with you sir,
BamBhole1 2 years ago
Five stars, and I subscribed thank you for sharing.
mtheoryrules 3 years ago
Thx for sharing this!!!
theblogmachine 3 years ago
Thank you for posting this.
TJZaman 3 years ago
Thanks for sharing. I read an article of him based on multiverses. Now I have another book to read... I can't wait. Thanks again for posting.
theStickerBush 3 years ago 2
mungry guth
zangief 3 years ago
nice word lol
FeelOfFriction 3 years ago
norralf
snapey82 3 years ago
where did he speak at? because i would love to meet this man.
Cole77788 3 years ago
He spoke at SkyScrapers, Scituate, RI- click MORE for complete info. BTW: where are you?
astrophoto 3 years ago
Oh well he is on the other side of the country.
I know he is VF of physics at MIT
but i was wondering if he might come here.
im in AZ
Cole77788 3 years ago