I'll assume you attend AA, so out of curiosity, what does it take to be accepted? Money, exellence, or both? The graduate course for instance, if being a foreigner, do they account your previous university score or just portfolio and interview? What are the courses like? And do you get the bigshots as crits often?
eisenman = arrogant confused bell piece if i was that student i would take the confused old man apart comparing people to monkeys who the fuk does he think he is
This is clearly the older profession being troubled by a new language that the students are comfortable speaking that is born from the technology of the day.
it's "nice" to know your history and beneficial to some degree but so much can be done and created without formally knowing it. Those guys are forgetting the innate aesthetic structural education that a contemporary society provides just by existing.
DEAR SWEET JESUS! Such a clasical meaning for the word "teacher" that one demonstrates - one that has no "inspiration" or tendency to "get the best out of the student" in it! Why would someone bother to carry this heavy duty, while it is so much fun to present himeself as a smarty pants and encourage suicidal thoughts into a young mind. Welldone dear "profesor"! Nicely played indeed!
Back when I was in college I had to go through some really though criticism from teachers. Then I discovered that people see what they want to see, because other equally good teachers would tell me that I was doing a good job or at least had the right idea. The difference between a good critic and a bad critic is that the good critic hints you at how to fix things, whereas the bad critic tells you that you suck and should change career, which happens very frequently.
damn! give a student a chance, sure u can learn architecture. tell me if there's anything in this world that cant be learn. don't think so. eisenman really need to chill. nobody is perfect, every one has their strong point and weak point just like he's brilliant with spaces and absolute crap with facade
Peter Eisenman is a retard who destroyed the centre of Berlin with a giant graveyard and talks even more BS than the average architect. That is a lot. Destroying a students confidence is not going to help.
I'm surprised anyone invited Eisenmann. He's a shitty critic. He should stick to fantasy football. It's as if his antipedagogy is the only one, and nobody learns unless they learn his way. He's also at a loss to say anything, so he masturbates about Fuller.
where was this?
bugaluu1 5 months ago
@bugaluu1 Architectural association....
KAWAL140587 5 months ago
@KAWAL140587
I'll assume you attend AA, so out of curiosity, what does it take to be accepted? Money, exellence, or both? The graduate course for instance, if being a foreigner, do they account your previous university score or just portfolio and interview? What are the courses like? And do you get the bigshots as crits often?
bugaluu1 4 months ago
@KAWAL140587
university of applied arts in vienna, actually
sheepdog90 3 months ago
what a load of crap
pinkfluffabc 6 months ago
I Do Not to be in her shoes!
CorvetteTeaser 8 months ago
wow, I remember that crit!!! was in the audience. poor student.
birgitesquex 8 months ago
eisenman = arrogant confused bell piece if i was that student i would take the confused old man apart comparing people to monkeys who the fuk does he think he is
234Anon432 10 months ago
This is clearly the older profession being troubled by a new language that the students are comfortable speaking that is born from the technology of the day.
it's "nice" to know your history and beneficial to some degree but so much can be done and created without formally knowing it. Those guys are forgetting the innate aesthetic structural education that a contemporary society provides just by existing.
xpez 10 months ago
that was hardly a debate in my opinion, more like a monologue.
superhadroncollider 10 months ago
kinda disappointed that wolf prix didn't defend for his student.
Discuzzz 1 year ago
2:43 "this is the question to your answer..." what a tool
certifideballer 1 year ago
Wow eisenman lynn and foster in the same crit
Chandabear88 1 year ago
"Screw you, Wolf. I'm not doing it!" That should be the slogan on a T-Shirt
FractalBolt 1 year ago
DEAR SWEET JESUS! Such a clasical meaning for the word "teacher" that one demonstrates - one that has no "inspiration" or tendency to "get the best out of the student" in it! Why would someone bother to carry this heavy duty, while it is so much fun to present himeself as a smarty pants and encourage suicidal thoughts into a young mind. Welldone dear "profesor"! Nicely played indeed!
radahip 1 year ago
god bless architecture and its bullshit. :D
gforemang 1 year ago 4
Back when I was in college I had to go through some really though criticism from teachers. Then I discovered that people see what they want to see, because other equally good teachers would tell me that I was doing a good job or at least had the right idea. The difference between a good critic and a bad critic is that the good critic hints you at how to fix things, whereas the bad critic tells you that you suck and should change career, which happens very frequently.
FractalBolt 1 year ago 5
Arrogance.
benarchy1 1 year ago 2
i agree that there really is no need to take a crit personally. point taken, move on. if one wanna act like a twat so be it.
009bilo 2 years ago 2
IS THAT ROSS LOVEGROVE SITTING BEHIND?.....OMFG!...
someone please tell eisenman to shut up!....n probably start building habitable spaces!
dattakingshuk 2 years ago
eisenman as a teacher is an absolute joke
rainmanovaheah 2 years ago 2
"Thanks for the advice, Ellsworth Toohey"
TwoTones 2 years ago
what's the difference b/w colasseo and bolomeme??
StudentCambodia 2 years ago
Palladio and Borromini.
vakno123 2 years ago
There Eisenmann was any thing, any rotten doughy dark thing, except an educational nobleman or a critic of value.
hzdedalus 2 years ago
damn! give a student a chance, sure u can learn architecture. tell me if there's anything in this world that cant be learn. don't think so. eisenman really need to chill. nobody is perfect, every one has their strong point and weak point just like he's brilliant with spaces and absolute crap with facade
biss7uk 2 years ago 4
Peter Eisenman is a retard who destroyed the centre of Berlin with a giant graveyard and talks even more BS than the average architect. That is a lot. Destroying a students confidence is not going to help.
Theologikos 2 years ago 4
Golden Rule: Never take a crit personnally. Develop a thick skin and learn from the instructor.
titohuertas 3 years ago 18
I would say this: "you sir, are a complete twat" pick up my work and leave.
remoman 3 years ago 2
Students are there to learn, so maybe some 'constructive' advise/criticism should be given, not to compare them to monkey at a type-writer!
ogfunk187 3 years ago 8
I'm surprised anyone invited Eisenmann. He's a shitty critic. He should stick to fantasy football. It's as if his antipedagogy is the only one, and nobody learns unless they learn his way. He's also at a loss to say anything, so he masturbates about Fuller.
hiero999 3 years ago