that lack of warming is due to an increase of warming...warmer temps increase the amount of water vapor (which is a green house gas) which increases the amount of cloud cover, which reflects sun light...the north atlantic conveyer brings warm water from the equator to the arctic regions, the melting of greenland and all the ice sheets releases fresh water into this current and disrupts it wich could send us into another ice age if it goes unchecked...
I've been on this earth more than 50 years and the climate has always changed.How else would we have seasons?Think that it's time to come up with a new scam.Go hide in your mansion, Al Gore,and leave us alone!
Rather than reporting this clip seems to be intended to propagandize in favor of the catastrophic man-made global climate change theory/hoax in the face of a very, very embarrassing turn of events...
@Mendelevium, There is a debate about whether we are headed for global warming or global cooling; if global warming, to what extent is this man-made and to what extent is it due to natural fluctuations on the earth and in the solar system? If largely man-made, what are appropriate remedies and what are mere money-making schemes?
Please click my name and scroll down to my "global climate change" playlist for a variety of views on the topic.
oh yeah and god forbid somebody hacks into george bush's computer and found 2 or 3 lines of discrediting information. they would be foaming at the mouth and it would be all over television for weeks. these bastards will fight this bullshit to the end, no matter what proof is given against it.
hockey stick theory, its a theory??? I thought that it was just a way of describing what the data looks like when placed into a graph. A theory would have to explain the facts, what explanations dose the hokey stick theory give?
or are is the "anchor" here trying to use the world theory in its common use, like as a guess or hastily put together idea.
In ether case it seems the real news had just step way for reporting, not fact checking or have started spinning this information.
The whole global warming agenda is about the institution of world communism and the nonsense of taxing people for non issue things like breathing. While they do that they want the fat cats at the top to be awarded carbon credits. Sure...they can buy them. World communism is outright theft and slavery and global warming was their vehicle. Not going for it.
RealNews is completely biased regarding Global Warming. Quoting a "scientist" from the IPCC to question the integrity of the IPCC is ridiculous. The mandate of the IPCC was to prove human activity was the cause of global warming. Anyone who would disagree was excluded from the IPCC, and was also under the thread of having their research funds removed.
TheRealNews puts forth a lot of unbiased news but I have to say, they are completely in the tank for global warming. This interview fails to get the other side of the story. The guest doesn't even address the key issue of the emails: The fact that they acknowledge that there isn't evidence to back a warming trend. When you guys completely avoid that important issue, I have to think that something is keeping you from exploring all sides. I mean, don't you want the truth?
In your little world credibility must equal brainlessness! It felt like I was watching FOX news, Global warming is a scam, If you want to pay a carbon tax go right ahead, but don't come knocking on my door expecting to get anything but hot lead!
haha, tatonka, please spare me your macho boasting. Just because you don't want to pay taxes doesn't mean there is no global warming. I actually think that carbon tax and trade and similar crap are probably wrong and that there are better ways to deal with the problem, but they do not deny the existance of GW... Grow up a bit, cowgirl.
I ask you, on the basis of these muddying comments by an advocate of human generated global warming, are you happy to increase your contribution of your hard earned equity along with freedoms to a small group of bankers & criminals?
Seriously folks, if we allow these globalists to impose such draconian control, we might as well sterilise all of our offspring (for that is their intention).
Residing beneath this debacle, is the eugenics programme.
I have data sets from UK Met Office that I've used for years. They show none of the warming claimed by these liars.
Science today, especially within the peer review process, has lost its integrity in a host of areas.
Ice extent in the Arctic is already back up at 1979 levels. Skiing has started early. And all of this correlates with the present inactivity of the sun.
Its utterly amazing just how far this fiasco has gone. The weather across the globe is clearly demonstrating a substantial rate of cooling. Today we see record low temperature & snowfall in Mexico to follow record breaking events across the globe.
These advocates of anthropogenic global warming are utterly fraudulent. Its a scam & diversion but if left unchallenged will enable the most terrifying prospect of global tyranny.
@nly8nchz USGS: "Scientists have calculated that volcanoes emit between about 145-255 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. Emissions of CO2 by human activities amount to about 30 billion tons per year. Human activities release more than 130 times the amount of CO2 emitted by volcanoes."
@nly8nchz My sources have provided me with the uptick in CO2 concentrations over the last 50 years: "It couldn't possibly be true given the CO2 record from any of the dozens of sampling stations around the globe. If it were true that individual volcanic eruptions dominated human emissions and were causing the rise in CO2 concentrations, then these CO2 records would be full of spikes -- one for each eruption. Instead, such records show a SMOOTH AND REGULAR TREND."
Yea... Libertarians don't support ANYBODY! They can't, because everything libertarians do is a failure and then they have to dishonestly try to disown them.
What about Harry Potter? He could wave his magic wand and make all the nasty regulations disappear.
Meanwhile, the rest of us live in a place called reality...you should look into it
"But perhaps Greenspan's most important contribution has been as the policymaker who, through the power of his office, the force of his intellect and the cunning of his behind-the-scenes maneuvering, engineered the wholesale deregulation of the U.S. banking and financial system." - Washington Post
So I'd say that Greenspan has better credentials as a libertarian than you. After all, what did you deregulate?
"In its twilight days, the Reagan administration was determined to further fertilize the seeds of deregulation and Greenspans Ayn Rand-inspired objectivist, free-market philosophies would be the perfect embodiment of the deregulatory movement."
How Deregulation Eviscerated the Banking Sector Safety Net and Spawned the U.S. Financial Crisis By Shah Gilani - The Money Map Report
And given the complex nature of the society we live in. and the variety of the nature of our interaction, it is natural that there will be thousands of pages. It is as I said before, you somehow think a magic wand will be waved; but until then everybody who is REALLY working to deregulate like Greenspan is a charlatan? What crap, everybody can see through that.
You seem to ignorantly think that just because there are pages of statues that there is not deregulation. I thought Libertarians were all about 'contracts' being enforced? You cannot have even a "free-market" without written rules at least to delineate what the market is and what would constitute interference and the penalties of such.
I is typical of Libertarians that they use the 'No true Scotsman' fallacy. I have seen some that say that Paul isn't a libertarian because he doesn't support Hayek or Mises or some other thing. It is the Libertarian way that they throw their own under a bus when it becomes evident that 'free-market' ideas are a disaster and then they must try to separate themselves from people that instigated the disaster.
"Volcanoes produce more greenhouse gasses" Blatant lie. Volcanoes release 1/150th of the GHGs emitted by us. Google " Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans—Not even close ..."
Why would you need to lie or juke the numbers, we all want to clean up our mess and do whats right. How can we trust them now that we have the evidence of their betrayal. The BS fear mongering has been the norm. Im sure the money was the primary issue here. How much did they get to research climate change. Global control and greed, depopulation all the agendas of the power elite.
He's right in that we should never assume that everyone was in on something if someone did conspire to perform some action secretly, but the idea of at least inflating the data to get more money for grants and renown is a motive that all these climate change researchers have in common.
On top of this is the idea that CO2 is the primary culprit, which is not true. However, because people believe it, it will be used to create a ridiculous tax, the purpose of which is quite questionable.
One person can't make Global warming a farce, it takes many. This is beyond getting grants, this leads to the attorney general for one and many more to come. This story is not dead by a long shot. You shills coming on here and trying to quelle the storm...good luck.
Your wording wasn't particularly clear, unless I have misunderstood something. I don't mean to say that it is necessarily just about providing income for scientists. I realize that this movement against climate change, and the tax that may come from it, have serious implications regarding global government.
But out of curiosity, who were you directing the shill insult to? If it's me I'd like to discuss it, but I'm not sure if it was and just wanted to know.
The REASON these piers (a few hundred) agree on the globe warming stance is because those who have disagreed are kept out of the THEIR pier review process by many means. At the funding level. Ridicule. Them and Us mindset. etc. Also the analysis methodology has not been released for over a decade now.
Living things dieing is a natural phenomenon, it has been happening long before the existence of man and will continue long after man.
So the conclusion to be drawn from that statement is that man is never responsible for killing things? Or that human beings shouldn't worry about killing things because it happens anyway?
An analogy is a comparison of two data sets with the same relationship. Read your comment, then read my comment and see if you notice a similar relationship.
After that read the questions I wrote and ponder how they might be relevant to your own assumptions about climate change.
Keep reading it until you figure out what's going on. There is nothing to debate here. You made an incorrect assumption and if you read and understand what I am saying you will realize that.
Sorry but your misguided attampt at an analogy proves that you are clueless , Trying to associate a fact to bookcooking and psuedo science shows you fall flat on your face.
I did not associate or even mention any "bookcooking" or psuedo science". Please take my advice and reread the comments and try responding like a rational human being.
spliffsperlunk seems a little dense, but on his behalf I'd like to clarify his potential intention. I think what he meant was that the Earth has been much hotter, and much colder in the past, and that the CO2 level has also been different in both directions. Humans are causing damage to the atmosphere and planet, but the idea that we are superheating the Earth to unnatural levels using CO2 completely on our own isn't likely true, but the money in it works to silence any skeptics.
Thank you for responding like a rational human being. Now if spliffsperlunk could start doing the same I would be pleased.
The claim that scientists have an incentive to hype climate change may be true, but remember that people being financed by private industry have an incentive to deny climate change as well. Potential carbon taxes would put a dent in many industries, and denying climate change potentially stops taxes being levied against them.
You raise a very good point about finances and information. It's the same reason no completely unbiased 9/11 investigation will ever happen (mostly like neither side of that argument is right on).
I argue though that while pollution must be stopped, this focus on automobile CO2 emissions is overblown due to the atmosphere's previous highs and lows in both temperature and CO2 levels, historically. This leads me to suspect legislation about it as being the means to an end, be it globalist or not.
It seems like these "conspiracy theories" are becoming more and more plausible. And only recently has it become "climate change" renamed after they couldnt account for lack of warming.
You are the one make the accusations without substance. Paul is a 'free-market' wacko, that's not 'sensible regulation' except perhaps in the twisted libertarian world. I did provide facts and sources you being a libertarian have no need of such things so you ignore them. But you're right I didn't really need to call you an idiot, you've been proving it quite well without me pointing it out further. And I can't remove anything, this isn't my channel, it is clearly you that doesn't have a clue.
1000 years ago the temperature was as warm or warmer than it is now. Research medieval warm period that lasted about 500 years. No cars, planes, industrial complex and yet very warm temps. North Atlantic ocean was estimated to be 1 degree celcius WARMER than todays waters. Why? Because the earth is constantly changing. It cycles. Its done it for 4 billion years. We are just the latest dominant species to inhabit this world and it will continue changing long after we are gone.
For point of argument. Why won't Al Gore debate? If global warming was on the up and up and the globe needed to cool down. Why in the last 20 years has the American industry moved from a country with the highest air standards to country's with none and virtually no established manufacturing base? ITS ALL BULLSHIT NOTHING MORE THAN GREED AND POWER, TO CONTROL EVERYONE, ROME IS BURNING YOUR CASTLES ARE CRUMBLING HOLD ON FOLKS THEY'VE BEEN MADE. WE'LL ALL WILL FIND OUT HOW NASTY THESE PEOPLE ARE.
You know it is false when the M.S.M. doesn't even cover this story. That should tell you right there that the fraud is alive and well. Maybe a blurb to discredit it and then not heard of ever again. You just have to follow the bread crumbs. The media is just as complicit as the fraudulent scientists. Anyone with a brain knows when the M.S media is ignoring a story...there is smoke, where there is smoke......
Except the MSM IS reporting the story, everywhere. Nice try, though. Google "Global Warming" on Google News and you will find over 2500 articles over the past week. NY Times, Boston Globe, Guardian, LA Times, Chicago Tribune etc.
look at it this way as far as msm coverage of these emails......what if tiger woods got hacked and they found emails from a bimbo he was poffing....now think...this is about the ending of the world, the extinction of our civilization....and the press coverage is very limited. also, if you read my post, you would see i included that some covered it in blurbs to discredit the emails....so in fact, it is you who needs a brain.
But, this does not invalidate QM, though it might obscure a couple of the finer details of advanced QM, which subsequent experimentation and analysis will clear up soon enough as scientists pretty much like to be on each others cases all the time. I wouldn't bother reading the work/emails of the mistaken quantum physicist to decide whether QM is valid or not. Likewise, I don't need to read the emails of 3 or 4 dishonest climate scientists to know whether climate science is credible or not.
The tiny, close-knit clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the "global warming" fraud - for fraud is what we now know it to be - tampered with temperature data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures.
Prof, Ed Begley Jr, wisely says: The newly leaked emails do not call into question the existence of global warming! Do not call into question the existence of global warming, "don't get your information from me folks or any newscaster. Get it from peer reviewed climatetologist, climate Scientist with Ph.D. after their name. We have no individual right to destroy the common good for all.
Get off it the jigs up playing everyone for dam fools. This crap has destroyed our economy. Pay a tax for breathing? A tax to Al Gore? "A conspiracy theory" BWAAHAAHAHA
Timesonline: SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
When hasn't climate change been real? But the global warming agenda is just that; an agenda. It's purpose isn't the truth, but rather to protect it's own interest.
As for the email leaks not being damaging? It is to them. You can't lie to protect your interests, without it being damaging when you're caught.
Because if you were right, I, or anyone with an agenda could potentially get a position working for a scientific organization with the intent to sabotage it by sending scandalous emails.
I could damage the Theory of Relativity by going to work for a physics dept and sending emails which say I fudged data.
Peer-reviewed data is the end all be all in this argument.
While we are on the subject of "agenda"; I should point out that fossil fuel industry has spent billions of dollars trying to disprove the existence of man-made climate change. Why? To protect their interests.
Before you spout off about how climate chance isn't influenced by man maybe you should examine the evidence that made you come to that conclusion in the first place and make sure it wasn't a propaganda piece put forth to promote the agenda of the fossil fuel industry.
@ArcticSlicer actually Exxon, British Petroleum, and Royal Dutch Shell all support Cap and Trade legislation....in fact they will benefit greatly........you see, you're the flat Earther on the side of the corporations
They support cap and trade because it's easily exploited doesn't interfere with business as usual. They don't however support a straight up carbon tax that would finally put the brakes on their looting and polluting.
As the climate crisis worsens there will be more push for a true carbon tax which is why the fossil fuel industry has much to gain by supporting the denial of man's effect on climate.
This does not look like a "real" news report. It looks and sounds unprepared, unrehearsed, and unprofessional. This is an important story! Script it! Edit it! Use cue cards, people!!
It physically hurts me to read their comments. It's like, to protect their worship of over consumption, they would go to any lengths to prove that "it's not their fault" that things are turning to shit. Can you imagine how many times physics has been amended since it started, or biology even? Science IS about change, and these emails, although I agree should be investigated, do nothing do dissuade me or any other rational person that climate change is real.
@lynchmobb2000 look moron, this video only talks about two e-mails....there are about a thousand.......and that's another thing, these greenfreaks wouldn't share their data so that it could be properly reviewed.......and now guess what............all there data has been lost all of the sudden ...check it ...front page of drudge report
For the sake of argument I will grant you all the emails were accurate and these researchers were guilty of falsifying data.
It does not matter because they data was never published in peer reviewed journals and if they attempted to do so, it would have been vetted and dumped just as is done every day.
Now let's get back to talking about the thousands of peer reviewed papaers which support the fact of man-made climate change instead of one discarded anomaly.
@lynchmobb2000 thousands ??? sure let's hear about some of those, but you forget....peer reviewed means nothing, this game was rigged..... all studies were based on either faulty - inadequate computer models on bad data from the CRU.....what's the point of debating papers that are based on lies ??
"Peer reviewed means nothing" I hope that is not directed at ALL of science because the peer review process is an integral part of ALL of science. You can't just dismiss it at your whim, because a particular field of science does not suit your political ideals. Especially since climate science is subjected to peer review like no other area of science currently is.
ALL the data used to make climate predictions about global warming is available at realclimate d(o)t o r g in raw format as well as processed (so that you can check how the climate scientists arrive at their conclusions from the raw data). C'mon get cracking so you can prove them wrong!
It's clear that these climatologist are all about the MONEY. They want the money to keep flowing their way. They don't want to give up the gravy train ka-ching. Their so called science has become about pushing a political agenda. I've never believed that "MAN" is the reason for global warming. Oh one last thing , i miss global warming also known as SUMMER.
@lynchmobb200 Those climatologist that don't go along with the political agenda "man" is the reason for global warming will have their grant money cut off. So yes money is the driving force , even if it's tiny money it's money.
Polar caps are receding on Mars, is this mans fault? The earth has been changing CONTINUOSLY since time began. The peer review BS is a joke. Many scientists, that do not agree with those who say man causes global warming, are not included in the peer reviewing. This has been proven to be an agenda for globalists, globalists who want more control over MAN. Think and learn before you write.
climate shift doesn't mean your neighborhood is always getting hotter.
You are right, since 3-4 people withheld information, the mountains of data, the past history of CFCs destroying the ozone layer and the geological record which shows how in fact the planet responds to global warming should be thrown away.
While were at it, lets forget the mathematical fact that our primary fuel source is finite and will run out without a valid replacement... no worries there...
WOW. I didn't realize that the Real News has it's own agenda and is no better than the MSM it claims are evil. This video is a joke! I think any sane person now realizes that man made global warming is a complete and total hoax. I will now unsubscribe from this channel and never watch it again.
And don't be an idiot, fascism is capitalist-rightist, it is the polar opposite of socialism. This has long been settled in the real academic world. Only retarded libertarians try to claim otherwise. They have nothing to do with one another other than being mortal enemies. And your comment about 'unproductive' people shows you know nothing about socialism. Socialism is ALL about working and labor.
So what happens when socialists like our president and jis admin have Marxist tendencies? Like handing insurance companies a pay raise via healthcare reform and letting lawyer corporations dictate the leaving out of tort reform?
Socialist? Marxist Tendencies? You are retarded, why don't you ask for his birth certificate too.
And if there is a pay raise for insurance companies it will be because of the rightwing and its obstructionism and the watering of the bill down to pass. But we should just have single payer or a real socialized system (two different things) and just nix all the insurance companies anyway.
And malpractice accounts for less than 1% of medical costs. Most of that is from repeat offenders. If you want to reign that in, get the private AMA to rescind the licenses of he doctors that are causing it. Better yet let's make the AMA a gov't agency and do it ourselves. And you wouldn't be saying any of this if any of your family were the victim of malpractice and needed lifetime care.
It is the very sort of eviscerated of gov't that Paul stands for, that allowed Madoff to get away with his scheme. We have been 'deregulated' and have had the 'free-market' junk pushed on us since even before Reagan. Like the libertarian Greenspan; doing all he could to hinder any sort of regulatory process that did exist. So you are somewhat right in that we must enforce the laws that exist, but the very reason that we haven't been is because of libertarian 'free-market' crap.
Is it me, or is having one of the end users of this manipulated data on you program a bad idea?
It get the feeling that the real news is annoyed at the negative response from that previous global warming post, resulting in an improperly researched video. It seems like a bunch of clippings from other mainstream news outlets.
suppression of evidence, peer reviews squashed, threatening scientific journals, corrupted data-there is way more to these emails than this video wants to list-search for the emails online and read for yourself-AGW is back to being a bare hypothesis-blame the pro AGW psuedo-scientists for screwing it up. Its back to square one. Toss the research up till now and start over with the correct protocols in place.
This is a real joke. They couldn't be more biased or agenda driven if they tried. The "stolen" emails really have the worms over at "real news" in a bunch.
the climate change doesnt really concern me the planet is going threw a pole shift anyway and will for sometime so changes are expected , it wasnt cars and our impact that sunk the city of Atlantis was it heh
absolutely doesnt matter if this institute has some inferior interferences, "wake up"!
Its very, VERY hard to find credible scientist who support this USELESS and destructive phrasemonger "hoax" theorys, sorry.
Conspiracy fans love it blind, yes.
But it helps noone but unscrupulous and naive nature destroyers (corp. and priv.) conscience to feel fine again. Most people dont even understand, or know how important and SENSIBLE mom nature is. We lost the way.
Good grief, how do even function in day to day society? or do they have a computer in the psychiatric ward where you are interred? Paul is not only for 'de-regulation' he is for 'free-market' junk which is de-regulation on steroids. Paul can complain about is but in his world nothing would be done to regulate the bankers. Go away paultard. Fuck his voting record, you want the only good voting record, look to Bernie Sanders.
lol, that is retarded. Do you know how many PhDs there are in climatology? Do you have any idea how much work is required for a PhD? Each person who earns a PhD has to basically write a book that is from there research with their own? You know when NASA does it studies, it works with tree and not the stuff it sends into space. You are a compete moron.
well that wasn't one sided at all LMAO....spin it any way you want it still smells bad......it is a FRAUD and a LIE....and now no one believes so save your lame excuses "reporter"
Does human activity effect the planet? Of course, that is all ecosystems, including climate and the rise and/or fall of global temperatures. However, when anyone, such as the scientist interviewed here begin to use verbiage like he doesn't understand how hundreds of people can maintain a conspiracy simultaneously over time, is a sure sign that a conspiracy exists.
Pirie Reis Map shows that antarctica was free of ice only HUNDREDS of years ago. The scientists believe that antarctica was covered in miles deep ice for THOUSANDS of years. The map mapper didn't have modern technology to look deep into the ice. He just mapped the continent by the same method all map makers do...observation. How does that fit into the "facts" that these scientists are arguing?
The Pirie Reis Map shows an Antarctica was free of ice??? The reason the Pirie Reis Map if it is of south America and Antarctica it shows no waterway between South America and Antarctica. Meaning the someone drew this map in 4000BC or before. That is what is so odd about the map. To be what is looks like, it would need to be drawn in the last ice age. It was WAY to much ice not too little.
Somebody drew the map 4000 BC? Strange that our history books teach us that sailing across the pacific and antlantic ocean first took place hundreds of years ago. But I don't agree with historians on this either. Humans have sailed across the oceans for THOUSANDS of years. Scientists said antarctica was covered in ice for 1 million years...now they say 9000 years...and now they are reconsidering that too with the Pirie map and all. Can they make up their mind??
Well yes, that would be why the map is so strange and why it provokes some much interest. No historian can place an culture in the area of large scale sea travel in 4000 BC. Other people say the map shows mythical island of Antillia and possibly Japan. But no, other then you, say it shows a ice free Antarctica. And I would like to see the artical that showed scientist saying something that was found to be 9000 years old which they claimed to be 1 million. Carbon dating is your friend.
Dude, the northern portion of antarctica Queen Maud Land in Antarctica was indeed mapped. The map was drawn in 1513 (copied from an earlier map). Cook got the credit for it's discovery - in the 1700's even though it was already mapped.
Carbon dating would have worked had somebody back in the day had the forsight of carbon dating technology and brought back a sample for you to use.
So basically, they have to report the conspiracy theorists and the actual scientists? If you're not a scientist, stay the f****k out of the issue.
And can you imagine how HARD it is to find a SCIENTIST that is a climate change skeptic? I have not yet met a single scientist* climate change skeptic.
" climate changed never so fast = "fact" " - Yes it did, but never "naturally". Mostly due to a comet hitting the planet or a super volcano erupting. Both, btw, tend to release a huge number of blocking particles(and/or CO2) into the atmosphere.
Wake up zombies, the scientists community has recently new data and proof, The earth is flat, and if you dont convert to the new world order of corporate capitalism you will fall off the edge. Climate change is the biggest Joke of the 21century and they did nothing to protect us.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Good report. The stolen and absurdly edited, out of context, emails represent another smear campaign by deranged crackpots who oppose the scientific evidence that global warning is real and a serious problem.
These people minimizing the danger are often creationists or have other ideo-political agendas for their views.
Intelligent and reasonable people understand that the climatologists are correct.
The accelerating melting of artic glaciers is all the proof any reasonable person needs.
What a lying piece of garbage, This is horrible manipulation, and misleading reporting, by the RealNews. Then they interview Michael Brklacic , a KNOWN discreditable scientist on the climate science.
This whole coverage this story is just a travesty for the FACTS.
Really, what has Michael Brklacich published that has been shown to be falsified? I mean he is Professor and Chair of Geography and Environmental Studies at Carleton U. But hey, we can lesson to Lord Christopher Monckton cause he has his diploma in ... journalism
We the people that never drank your Kool-Aid" from the start were called "deniers".
Now that we have HARD documentation that proves that global warming was and STILL IS nothing but a farce, we deniers will come together and let OUR voices be heard to oppose you vermin.
May those that push global warming and the lies, ROT IN HELL!!! Your days are numbered.
look at the sun and position of the earth and its magnetic field dummy.. Its all due to solar activity .Why you want to hide this unmistakable truth? All your effort in calculating predicting numbers are a waste of time as no factor is constant but always changing. You guys cant even predict the weather. Fact scientists weather man are just guessing and gabling and like any prayer 50 % will come true and 50 % fail.
what a fuckin idiot. too many people for a conspiracy? have you ever heard of the Manhattan Project? you call yourself a professor? at Carleton? haha! fuckin tools
what would it be like if i had high blood pressure, but then i broke my arm skydiving? what if i just caught a cold and it went away in about a week? should i see the doctor then?
Neither is there any mention in this report of the fact that these e-mails have been sent to the BBC 5 weeks before the story came out on the various conspiracy channels and they refused to report on it.
Only now that the story is out there they have no other choice than to report on it and try to defuse the situation by using their usual techniques of manipulating the news so people don't have to form an opinion of their own or do any investigating work.
I think Russia Today has handled it pretty well. They have an equal amount of speaking time for both sides of the argument and I haven't seen their reporter taking sides or shrewdly suggesting an opinion (like making remarks that the e-mails were stolen).
The e-mails and scientific data should have been public knowledge in the first place and have been requested under the freedom of information act, but the government put a stop to that request. No mention of that in this report.
"errr hackers hacked into the errr email system err err" hackers hacked into the computer system that contains the email system, if it was just the email system they wouldnt have got hold of other files and the computer code for these models commented by the coder with informative comments get your facts right "THE REAL NEWS" I thought you were the real news but obviously youre biased too
yeah real news. get someone from the ipcc to explain the email. very one sided and you can tell their own opinion in the news reports voice. just cuz you put real before news doesnt make it real or news. its good to hear another side but the other side has been the side everyone has heard about for the past 10 years.
This event is useful to determin which media outlets use marketing/brain influencing techniques though.
Every media outlet that somehow tries to pretend that these e-mails mean very little, that they were stolen (making the hackers look bad), and more remarks like that, only shows that that particular media outlet can't be trusted and is probably owned by the same corporations/people behind the NWO.
Seeing this video shows you can't trust this media outlet, good to know.
That is exactly what I was thinking. Once you know how the magician does the trick, he can't fool you any more. The more they twist the truth using propaganda methods the more they show their true colors and expose themselves for who they really are.
Read about [overcoming the trickster, media wars of the 21st century] for some helpful information on how to spot these shills.
However, it is not just the 'credibility of three or four scientists' that is at stake here. It's the credibility of the entire scientific community, which is seen as playing politics once again.
No one can say that they didn't have it coming, though.
he is lying
Silverwolf352 2 months ago
If you are interested in hacking someone's email, search for the user hackhunterh7 on Youtube, he has a video with the program.
It works very well.
PeterHatYai2008 9 months ago
that scientist roll and look to the around enough?
benardoable 10 months ago
that lack of warming is due to an increase of warming...warmer temps increase the amount of water vapor (which is a green house gas) which increases the amount of cloud cover, which reflects sun light...the north atlantic conveyer brings warm water from the equator to the arctic regions, the melting of greenland and all the ice sheets releases fresh water into this current and disrupts it wich could send us into another ice age if it goes unchecked...
TheOnemandigitaljam 1 year ago
I've been on this earth more than 50 years and the climate has always changed.How else would we have seasons?Think that it's time to come up with a new scam.Go hide in your mansion, Al Gore,and leave us alone!
atrueamerican1 1 year ago
Rather than reporting this clip seems to be intended to propagandize in favor of the catastrophic man-made global climate change theory/hoax in the face of a very, very embarrassing turn of events...
Where's the other side on this issue?
classic14rider 2 years ago
what are the other sides? plz tell me, trying to figure the truth out of this
Mendelevium146 2 years ago
@Mendelevium, There is a debate about whether we are headed for global warming or global cooling; if global warming, to what extent is this man-made and to what extent is it due to natural fluctuations on the earth and in the solar system? If largely man-made, what are appropriate remedies and what are mere money-making schemes?
Please click my name and scroll down to my "global climate change" playlist for a variety of views on the topic.
classic14rider 2 years ago
oh yeah and god forbid somebody hacks into george bush's computer and found 2 or 3 lines of discrediting information. they would be foaming at the mouth and it would be all over television for weeks. these bastards will fight this bullshit to the end, no matter what proof is given against it.
creamyfilling102 2 years ago
Our bearded friend should take up medicine, or theology.
TroyaE117 2 years ago
(the REAL temps) Does that mean they sometimes use (the fake temps)?
i smell a liar.
deletemepleez 2 years ago
hockey stick theory, its a theory??? I thought that it was just a way of describing what the data looks like when placed into a graph. A theory would have to explain the facts, what explanations dose the hokey stick theory give?
or are is the "anchor" here trying to use the world theory in its common use, like as a guess or hastily put together idea.
In ether case it seems the real news had just step way for reporting, not fact checking or have started spinning this information.
fireflygirl246 2 years ago
Well, he isn't really a scientist, so it doesn't surprise me to see a misuse of a term. A huge number of people make the same mistake.
ctvwr 2 years ago
He stopped comments on his blog, wonder why?
jimcorkern 2 years ago
Stupid f$cking analogy.
OsamaBinForgotten2 2 years ago
Global Warming is flat Earth theory. This guy is an idiot.
Global Warming is a hoax. Finally it is proven that it is a full blown hoax.
Global Warming is now a religion, not science.
SEASOFCONFUSION 2 years ago
Do you have shares in Exxon Mobil?
Mjhavok 2 years ago
The whole global warming agenda is about the institution of world communism and the nonsense of taxing people for non issue things like breathing. While they do that they want the fat cats at the top to be awarded carbon credits. Sure...they can buy them. World communism is outright theft and slavery and global warming was their vehicle. Not going for it.
ancestralblue 2 years ago
they are going down
26chrisg 2 years ago
RealNews is completely biased regarding Global Warming. Quoting a "scientist" from the IPCC to question the integrity of the IPCC is ridiculous. The mandate of the IPCC was to prove human activity was the cause of global warming. Anyone who would disagree was excluded from the IPCC, and was also under the thread of having their research funds removed.
See watch?v=Cu_ok37HDuE (ClimateGate Who's Who)
DanMorin007 2 years ago
@TheRealNews
TheRealNews puts forth a lot of unbiased news but I have to say, they are completely in the tank for global warming. This interview fails to get the other side of the story. The guest doesn't even address the key issue of the emails: The fact that they acknowledge that there isn't evidence to back a warming trend. When you guys completely avoid that important issue, I have to think that something is keeping you from exploring all sides. I mean, don't you want the truth?
sivartretrac 2 years ago
In your little world credibility must equal brainlessness! It felt like I was watching FOX news, Global warming is a scam, If you want to pay a carbon tax go right ahead, but don't come knocking on my door expecting to get anything but hot lead!
Tatonka322 2 years ago
haha, tatonka, please spare me your macho boasting. Just because you don't want to pay taxes doesn't mean there is no global warming. I actually think that carbon tax and trade and similar crap are probably wrong and that there are better ways to deal with the problem, but they do not deny the existance of GW... Grow up a bit, cowgirl.
crnogoracz 2 years ago 3
I ask you, on the basis of these muddying comments by an advocate of human generated global warming, are you happy to increase your contribution of your hard earned equity along with freedoms to a small group of bankers & criminals?
Seriously folks, if we allow these globalists to impose such draconian control, we might as well sterilise all of our offspring (for that is their intention).
Residing beneath this debacle, is the eugenics programme.
pondman27 2 years ago
I have data sets from UK Met Office that I've used for years. They show none of the warming claimed by these liars.
Science today, especially within the peer review process, has lost its integrity in a host of areas.
Ice extent in the Arctic is already back up at 1979 levels. Skiing has started early. And all of this correlates with the present inactivity of the sun.
pondman27 2 years ago
Its utterly amazing just how far this fiasco has gone. The weather across the globe is clearly demonstrating a substantial rate of cooling. Today we see record low temperature & snowfall in Mexico to follow record breaking events across the globe.
These advocates of anthropogenic global warming are utterly fraudulent. Its a scam & diversion but if left unchallenged will enable the most terrifying prospect of global tyranny.
pondman27 2 years ago
Thank you for your honesty, it is a reflection of your integrity. There's so little of that around nowadays.
wdednam 2 years ago
This video looks like a parody. I am amazed it isn't. Only Morons believe shit like this....
apathy74 2 years ago
Michael Brklacic - where is the debate sir?
so you say "we are not talking about global warming. we are talking about climate change"
so if the situation is criticized then the name of the situation is then change to make the situation more ambiguous? give me a break man.
halliburtoncrusher 2 years ago
@nly8nchz USGS: "Scientists have calculated that volcanoes emit between about 145-255 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. Emissions of CO2 by human activities amount to about 30 billion tons per year. Human activities release more than 130 times the amount of CO2 emitted by volcanoes."
wdednam 2 years ago
@nly8nchz My sources have provided me with the uptick in CO2 concentrations over the last 50 years: "It couldn't possibly be true given the CO2 record from any of the dozens of sampling stations around the globe. If it were true that individual volcanic eruptions dominated human emissions and were causing the rise in CO2 concentrations, then these CO2 records would be full of spikes -- one for each eruption. Instead, such records show a SMOOTH AND REGULAR TREND."
wdednam 2 years ago
He is right you are wrong. Anyone can actually check it and see that you are, and have been all along, a fool.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
I should be specific here for other readers benifit and say, wdednam is right.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(6/6)
Yea... Libertarians don't support ANYBODY! They can't, because everything libertarians do is a failure and then they have to dishonestly try to disown them.
What about Harry Potter? He could wave his magic wand and make all the nasty regulations disappear.
Meanwhile, the rest of us live in a place called reality...you should look into it
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(5/6)
"But perhaps Greenspan's most important contribution has been as the policymaker who, through the power of his office, the force of his intellect and the cunning of his behind-the-scenes maneuvering, engineered the wholesale deregulation of the U.S. banking and financial system." - Washington Post
So I'd say that Greenspan has better credentials as a libertarian than you. After all, what did you deregulate?
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(4/6)
"In its twilight days, the Reagan administration was determined to further fertilize the seeds of deregulation and Greenspans Ayn Rand-inspired objectivist, free-market philosophies would be the perfect embodiment of the deregulatory movement."
How Deregulation Eviscerated the Banking Sector Safety Net and Spawned the U.S. Financial Crisis By Shah Gilani - The Money Map Report
Rundstedt1 2 years ago 2
(3/6)
And given the complex nature of the society we live in. and the variety of the nature of our interaction, it is natural that there will be thousands of pages. It is as I said before, you somehow think a magic wand will be waved; but until then everybody who is REALLY working to deregulate like Greenspan is a charlatan? What crap, everybody can see through that.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(2/6)
You seem to ignorantly think that just because there are pages of statues that there is not deregulation. I thought Libertarians were all about 'contracts' being enforced? You cannot have even a "free-market" without written rules at least to delineate what the market is and what would constitute interference and the penalties of such.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
(1/6)
I is typical of Libertarians that they use the 'No true Scotsman' fallacy. I have seen some that say that Paul isn't a libertarian because he doesn't support Hayek or Mises or some other thing. It is the Libertarian way that they throw their own under a bus when it becomes evident that 'free-market' ideas are a disaster and then they must try to separate themselves from people that instigated the disaster.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago 2
the real news is owned by al gore.
Javamann1 2 years ago
@Javamann1 Evidence would be helpful, please
wdednam 2 years ago
Damn, the debunkers are sure hitting this Vid hard...not much mention on M.S.M...shills galore...where there is smoke.....
blite13 2 years ago
"Volcanoes produce more greenhouse gasses" Blatant lie. Volcanoes release 1/150th of the GHGs emitted by us. Google " Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans—Not even close ..."
wdednam 2 years ago 2
So in his autobiography when he calls himself a Libertarian and describes the time he spent with Ayn Rand he's just talking gibberish?
Was Rand publishing some of his papers part of some strange joke she was playing?
comradepinko 2 years ago 4
These people will throw their idols under the bus faster than than you can say 'Milton Friedman'.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago 2
Why would you need to lie or juke the numbers, we all want to clean up our mess and do whats right. How can we trust them now that we have the evidence of their betrayal. The BS fear mongering has been the norm. Im sure the money was the primary issue here. How much did they get to research climate change. Global control and greed, depopulation all the agendas of the power elite.
makeitallrite 2 years ago
this guy says " how could there be that many people in on a conspiracy?" Isn't this said about evey conspiracy? As soon as someone says that = NEXT.
blite13 2 years ago
He's right in that we should never assume that everyone was in on something if someone did conspire to perform some action secretly, but the idea of at least inflating the data to get more money for grants and renown is a motive that all these climate change researchers have in common.
On top of this is the idea that CO2 is the primary culprit, which is not true. However, because people believe it, it will be used to create a ridiculous tax, the purpose of which is quite questionable.
TheStrix 2 years ago
One person can't make Global warming a farce, it takes many. This is beyond getting grants, this leads to the attorney general for one and many more to come. This story is not dead by a long shot. You shills coming on here and trying to quelle the storm...good luck.
blite13 2 years ago
Your wording wasn't particularly clear, unless I have misunderstood something. I don't mean to say that it is necessarily just about providing income for scientists. I realize that this movement against climate change, and the tax that may come from it, have serious implications regarding global government.
But out of curiosity, who were you directing the shill insult to? If it's me I'd like to discuss it, but I'm not sure if it was and just wanted to know.
TheStrix 2 years ago
The REASON these piers (a few hundred) agree on the globe warming stance is because those who have disagreed are kept out of the THEIR pier review process by many means. At the funding level. Ridicule. Them and Us mindset. etc. Also the analysis methodology has not been released for over a decade now.
Typamango 2 years ago
Glabal warming/cooling is a natural phenomenon, its been happening long before the existence of man and will comtinue long after man.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
Living things dieing is a natural phenomenon, it has been happening long before the existence of man and will continue long after man.
So the conclusion to be drawn from that statement is that man is never responsible for killing things? Or that human beings shouldn't worry about killing things because it happens anyway?
comradepinko 2 years ago 2
Man didnt kill off the dinosaurs, beleive it or not.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
Go find a dictionary and look up the word "analogy". After that you should read what I said a second time and try leaving a new comment.
comradepinko 2 years ago
Maybe you should look it up since you failed at making one.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
An analogy is a comparison of two data sets with the same relationship. Read your comment, then read my comment and see if you notice a similar relationship.
After that read the questions I wrote and ponder how they might be relevant to your own assumptions about climate change.
comradepinko 2 years ago
I read your comment , your attempt at an analogy is fail.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
Keep reading it until you figure out what's going on. There is nothing to debate here. You made an incorrect assumption and if you read and understand what I am saying you will realize that.
comradepinko 2 years ago
Sorry but your misguided attampt at an analogy proves that you are clueless , Trying to associate a fact to bookcooking and psuedo science shows you fall flat on your face.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
I compared two facts.
1) Climate change occurs naturally.
2) Things die naturally.
I did not associate or even mention any "bookcooking" or psuedo science". Please take my advice and reread the comments and try responding like a rational human being.
comradepinko 2 years ago 2
spliffsperlunk seems a little dense, but on his behalf I'd like to clarify his potential intention. I think what he meant was that the Earth has been much hotter, and much colder in the past, and that the CO2 level has also been different in both directions. Humans are causing damage to the atmosphere and planet, but the idea that we are superheating the Earth to unnatural levels using CO2 completely on our own isn't likely true, but the money in it works to silence any skeptics.
TheStrix 2 years ago
Thank you for responding like a rational human being. Now if spliffsperlunk could start doing the same I would be pleased.
The claim that scientists have an incentive to hype climate change may be true, but remember that people being financed by private industry have an incentive to deny climate change as well. Potential carbon taxes would put a dent in many industries, and denying climate change potentially stops taxes being levied against them.
Focus on the data, not the people involved.
comradepinko 2 years ago
You raise a very good point about finances and information. It's the same reason no completely unbiased 9/11 investigation will ever happen (mostly like neither side of that argument is right on).
I argue though that while pollution must be stopped, this focus on automobile CO2 emissions is overblown due to the atmosphere's previous highs and lows in both temperature and CO2 levels, historically. This leads me to suspect legislation about it as being the means to an end, be it globalist or not.
TheStrix 2 years ago
It seems like these "conspiracy theories" are becoming more and more plausible. And only recently has it become "climate change" renamed after they couldnt account for lack of warming.
CommonM1stak3 2 years ago 4
You are the one make the accusations without substance. Paul is a 'free-market' wacko, that's not 'sensible regulation' except perhaps in the twisted libertarian world. I did provide facts and sources you being a libertarian have no need of such things so you ignore them. But you're right I didn't really need to call you an idiot, you've been proving it quite well without me pointing it out further. And I can't remove anything, this isn't my channel, it is clearly you that doesn't have a clue.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
1000 years ago the temperature was as warm or warmer than it is now. Research medieval warm period that lasted about 500 years. No cars, planes, industrial complex and yet very warm temps. North Atlantic ocean was estimated to be 1 degree celcius WARMER than todays waters. Why? Because the earth is constantly changing. It cycles. Its done it for 4 billion years. We are just the latest dominant species to inhabit this world and it will continue changing long after we are gone.
Traveler2112 2 years ago 4
For point of argument. Why won't Al Gore debate? If global warming was on the up and up and the globe needed to cool down. Why in the last 20 years has the American industry moved from a country with the highest air standards to country's with none and virtually no established manufacturing base? ITS ALL BULLSHIT NOTHING MORE THAN GREED AND POWER, TO CONTROL EVERYONE, ROME IS BURNING YOUR CASTLES ARE CRUMBLING HOLD ON FOLKS THEY'VE BEEN MADE. WE'LL ALL WILL FIND OUT HOW NASTY THESE PEOPLE ARE.
evoval 2 years ago
You know it is false when the M.S.M. doesn't even cover this story. That should tell you right there that the fraud is alive and well. Maybe a blurb to discredit it and then not heard of ever again. You just have to follow the bread crumbs. The media is just as complicit as the fraudulent scientists. Anyone with a brain knows when the M.S media is ignoring a story...there is smoke, where there is smoke......
blite13 2 years ago 2
Except the MSM IS reporting the story, everywhere. Nice try, though. Google "Global Warming" on Google News and you will find over 2500 articles over the past week. NY Times, Boston Globe, Guardian, LA Times, Chicago Tribune etc.
Looks like you are the one without a brain.
jensen1901 2 years ago 2
look at it this way as far as msm coverage of these emails......what if tiger woods got hacked and they found emails from a bimbo he was poffing....now think...this is about the ending of the world, the extinction of our civilization....and the press coverage is very limited. also, if you read my post, you would see i included that some covered it in blurbs to discredit the emails....so in fact, it is you who needs a brain.
blite13 2 years ago
But, this does not invalidate QM, though it might obscure a couple of the finer details of advanced QM, which subsequent experimentation and analysis will clear up soon enough as scientists pretty much like to be on each others cases all the time. I wouldn't bother reading the work/emails of the mistaken quantum physicist to decide whether QM is valid or not. Likewise, I don't need to read the emails of 3 or 4 dishonest climate scientists to know whether climate science is credible or not.
wdednam 2 years ago
The tiny, close-knit clique of climate scientists who invented and now drive the "global warming" fraud - for fraud is what we now know it to be - tampered with temperature data so assiduously that, on the recent admission of one of them, land temperatures since 1980 have risen twice as fast as ocean temperatures.
Slammerooni 2 years ago
Prof, Ed Begley Jr, wisely says: The newly leaked emails do not call into question the existence of global warming! Do not call into question the existence of global warming, "don't get your information from me folks or any newscaster. Get it from peer reviewed climatetologist, climate Scientist with Ph.D. after their name. We have no individual right to destroy the common good for all.
danielnz1 2 years ago
Begley ?? you're quoting some hollyweirdo ? The peer review process was rigged, it's all based on lies
xXbizztonXx 2 years ago
Get off it the jigs up playing everyone for dam fools. This crap has destroyed our economy. Pay a tax for breathing? A tax to Al Gore? "A conspiracy theory" BWAAHAAHAHA
Timesonline: SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.
It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.
evoval 2 years ago
This isn't real news; it's an agenda. This video seems like straight up damage control to me.
It may not be the end of the world, but it looks very bad for them.
NC360 2 years ago
@NC360
There's no damage control here because there's no damage.
The only thing that matters is that the peer-reviewed data says that human behavior is leading to climate change on the earth.
Wouldn't matter if Al Gore came out tomorrow and said he doubts man-made climate change.
The scientific data trumps everything. Trumps emails. Trumps Al Gore. Trumps everything.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
When hasn't climate change been real? But the global warming agenda is just that; an agenda. It's purpose isn't the truth, but rather to protect it's own interest.
As for the email leaks not being damaging? It is to them. You can't lie to protect your interests, without it being damaging when you're caught.
NC360 2 years ago
@NC360
All that matters is peer-reviewed data.
Because if you were right, I, or anyone with an agenda could potentially get a position working for a scientific organization with the intent to sabotage it by sending scandalous emails.
I could damage the Theory of Relativity by going to work for a physics dept and sending emails which say I fudged data.
Peer-reviewed data is the end all be all in this argument.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
While we are on the subject of "agenda"; I should point out that fossil fuel industry has spent billions of dollars trying to disprove the existence of man-made climate change. Why? To protect their interests.
Before you spout off about how climate chance isn't influenced by man maybe you should examine the evidence that made you come to that conclusion in the first place and make sure it wasn't a propaganda piece put forth to promote the agenda of the fossil fuel industry.
ArcticSlicer 2 years ago
@ArcticSlicer actually Exxon, British Petroleum, and Royal Dutch Shell all support Cap and Trade legislation....in fact they will benefit greatly........you see, you're the flat Earther on the side of the corporations
xXbizztonXx 2 years ago
They support cap and trade because it's easily exploited doesn't interfere with business as usual. They don't however support a straight up carbon tax that would finally put the brakes on their looting and polluting.
As the climate crisis worsens there will be more push for a true carbon tax which is why the fossil fuel industry has much to gain by supporting the denial of man's effect on climate.
ArcticSlicer 2 years ago
This does not look like a "real" news report. It looks and sounds unprepared, unrehearsed, and unprofessional. This is an important story! Script it! Edit it! Use cue cards, people!!
N0thingAs1tSeems 2 years ago
Funny. Look at all these skeptic posts landing within minutes of eachother. Did you all just get out of your mothers meeting?
boneyd 2 years ago
It physically hurts me to read their comments. It's like, to protect their worship of over consumption, they would go to any lengths to prove that "it's not their fault" that things are turning to shit. Can you imagine how many times physics has been amended since it started, or biology even? Science IS about change, and these emails, although I agree should be investigated, do nothing do dissuade me or any other rational person that climate change is real.
Xakryn 2 years ago 3
Maybe Gore will finally SHUT UP!
DillonX 2 years ago
@DillonX
Wouldn't matter if Al Gore never says another word.
Wouldn't even matter if Al Gore came out tomorrow and said he doubts man-made climate change.
All that matters is that the peer-reviewed scietific data says that man-made climate change is real.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago 2
@lynchmobb2000 actually the e-mails also suggest that the peer-review process was rigged too, so even peer reviewed doesn't mean squat
xXbizztonXx 2 years ago
@xXbizztonXx
No they don't. Did you even pay attention to the video?
Every document submitted for peer review is rigorously check, vetted and sifted through for errors and methodological laziness.
If the numbers were fudged, this would have been caught either by other scientists working on the project or the project supervisor.
Now, please reply to me with your conspiracy theories about how they were all in on it.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
@lynchmobb2000 look moron, this video only talks about two e-mails....there are about a thousand.......and that's another thing, these greenfreaks wouldn't share their data so that it could be properly reviewed.......and now guess what............all there data has been lost all of the sudden ...check it ...front page of drudge report
xXbizztonXx 2 years ago
@xXbizztonXx
For the sake of argument I will grant you all the emails were accurate and these researchers were guilty of falsifying data.
It does not matter because they data was never published in peer reviewed journals and if they attempted to do so, it would have been vetted and dumped just as is done every day.
Now let's get back to talking about the thousands of peer reviewed papaers which support the fact of man-made climate change instead of one discarded anomaly.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
@lynchmobb2000 thousands ??? sure let's hear about some of those, but you forget....peer reviewed means nothing, this game was rigged..... all studies were based on either faulty - inadequate computer models on bad data from the CRU.....what's the point of debating papers that are based on lies ??
xXbizztonXx 2 years ago
"Peer reviewed means nothing" I hope that is not directed at ALL of science because the peer review process is an integral part of ALL of science. You can't just dismiss it at your whim, because a particular field of science does not suit your political ideals. Especially since climate science is subjected to peer review like no other area of science currently is.
wdednam 2 years ago 2
ALL the data used to make climate predictions about global warming is available at realclimate d(o)t o r g in raw format as well as processed (so that you can check how the climate scientists arrive at their conclusions from the raw data). C'mon get cracking so you can prove them wrong!
wdednam 2 years ago
It's clear that these climatologist are all about the MONEY. They want the money to keep flowing their way. They don't want to give up the gravy train ka-ching. Their so called science has become about pushing a political agenda. I've never believed that "MAN" is the reason for global warming. Oh one last thing , i miss global warming also known as SUMMER.
computerpurple 2 years ago
@computerpurple
Climatologists are after the money??
BAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH
A climatologist working at a university or non-profit is making $25K to $50K tops. Researchers are in it for the money??
Of course you overlook the fact that the oil companies who fund the "climate change is bunk" community has billions if not trillions at stake.
You might want to think that through before you post.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
@lynchmobb200 Those climatologist that don't go along with the political agenda "man" is the reason for global warming will have their grant money cut off. So yes money is the driving force , even if it's tiny money it's money.
computerpurple 2 years ago
Polar caps are receding on Mars, is this mans fault? The earth has been changing CONTINUOSLY since time began. The peer review BS is a joke. Many scientists, that do not agree with those who say man causes global warming, are not included in the peer reviewing. This has been proven to be an agenda for globalists, globalists who want more control over MAN. Think and learn before you write.
blite13 2 years ago
@blite13
You just expose yourself as being without the slightest understanding of science or the scientific process.
The same peer review process which produces new medicines, new metals, new plastics, new computers etc. etc is a joke?
Then when you take medicine, you are swallowing a joke.
When you use a computer you are using a joke.
You're not worried about scientists "controlling people" when they make things you like.
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago
Couldn't have said it better myself.
wdednam 2 years ago
climate shift doesn't mean your neighborhood is always getting hotter.
You are right, since 3-4 people withheld information, the mountains of data, the past history of CFCs destroying the ozone layer and the geological record which shows how in fact the planet responds to global warming should be thrown away.
While were at it, lets forget the mathematical fact that our primary fuel source is finite and will run out without a valid replacement... no worries there...
moron
ulgrum 2 years ago
@ulgrum Lets drill here , drill now.
computerpurple 2 years ago
WOW. I didn't realize that the Real News has it's own agenda and is no better than the MSM it claims are evil. This video is a joke! I think any sane person now realizes that man made global warming is a complete and total hoax. I will now unsubscribe from this channel and never watch it again.
jlailman 2 years ago
And don't be an idiot, fascism is capitalist-rightist, it is the polar opposite of socialism. This has long been settled in the real academic world. Only retarded libertarians try to claim otherwise. They have nothing to do with one another other than being mortal enemies. And your comment about 'unproductive' people shows you know nothing about socialism. Socialism is ALL about working and labor.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago 3
So what happens when socialists like our president and jis admin have Marxist tendencies? Like handing insurance companies a pay raise via healthcare reform and letting lawyer corporations dictate the leaving out of tort reform?
Zoklor 2 years ago
Socialist? Marxist Tendencies? You are retarded, why don't you ask for his birth certificate too.
And if there is a pay raise for insurance companies it will be because of the rightwing and its obstructionism and the watering of the bill down to pass. But we should just have single payer or a real socialized system (two different things) and just nix all the insurance companies anyway.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago 2
And malpractice accounts for less than 1% of medical costs. Most of that is from repeat offenders. If you want to reign that in, get the private AMA to rescind the licenses of he doctors that are causing it. Better yet let's make the AMA a gov't agency and do it ourselves. And you wouldn't be saying any of this if any of your family were the victim of malpractice and needed lifetime care.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
@Zoklor
Obama is a socialist?? He's not even a liberal.
You know how I know? Because I'm a socialist.
Incidentally so are you if you use or benefit from any of the following government services:
Police, Fire, Military
Electric, Water
Roads, Bridges, Tunnels
FDIC, FDA, SEC
Education
lynchmobb2000 2 years ago 2
It is the very sort of eviscerated of gov't that Paul stands for, that allowed Madoff to get away with his scheme. We have been 'deregulated' and have had the 'free-market' junk pushed on us since even before Reagan. Like the libertarian Greenspan; doing all he could to hinder any sort of regulatory process that did exist. So you are somewhat right in that we must enforce the laws that exist, but the very reason that we haven't been is because of libertarian 'free-market' crap.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago
better change your name to the same old crap thanks for giving us the same as major media
timetofly5 2 years ago
Is it me, or is having one of the end users of this manipulated data on you program a bad idea?
It get the feeling that the real news is annoyed at the negative response from that previous global warming post, resulting in an improperly researched video. It seems like a bunch of clippings from other mainstream news outlets.
AlexMadsen87 2 years ago
How where the emails stolen when those emails where paid for by the taxpayers, therefore, they should be owned by the taxpayers.
10kensea79 2 years ago
Another bought bull scientist. UNREAL news this should be called.
mulefa 2 years ago
suppression of evidence, peer reviews squashed, threatening scientific journals, corrupted data-there is way more to these emails than this video wants to list-search for the emails online and read for yourself-AGW is back to being a bare hypothesis-blame the pro AGW psuedo-scientists for screwing it up. Its back to square one. Toss the research up till now and start over with the correct protocols in place.
canditaylor68 2 years ago
Manmade global warming is bullshit.
dmaul7 2 years ago
This is Real News? It sounds like an Al Gore ass kissing contest, and santa clause is winning
bigdogsdontbark 2 years ago 2
This is a real joke. They couldn't be more biased or agenda driven if they tried. The "stolen" emails really have the worms over at "real news" in a bunch.
tooosweeet 2 years ago 3
the climate change doesnt really concern me the planet is going threw a pole shift anyway and will for sometime so changes are expected , it wasnt cars and our impact that sunk the city of Atlantis was it heh
TandLindustrys 2 years ago
This is hardly an unbiased report, if you want to call yourselves the real news try reporting instead of preaching.
JExecutiveOrder11110 2 years ago 5
Please look me at eyes when you are lying to me.
flacola 2 years ago 5
SAVE THE NATURE
absolutely doesnt matter if this institute has some inferior interferences, "wake up"!
Its very, VERY hard to find credible scientist who support this USELESS and destructive phrasemonger "hoax" theorys, sorry.
Conspiracy fans love it blind, yes.
But it helps noone but unscrupulous and naive nature destroyers (corp. and priv.) conscience to feel fine again. Most people dont even understand, or know how important and SENSIBLE mom nature is. We lost the way.
terbeon 2 years ago
Good grief, how do even function in day to day society? or do they have a computer in the psychiatric ward where you are interred? Paul is not only for 'de-regulation' he is for 'free-market' junk which is de-regulation on steroids. Paul can complain about is but in his world nothing would be done to regulate the bankers. Go away paultard. Fuck his voting record, you want the only good voting record, look to Bernie Sanders.
Rundstedt1 2 years ago 4
mAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX.
They based many of their thoeries of climate on 3 TREES IN A FOREST!
Wake up people!!!
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
lol, that is retarded. Do you know how many PhDs there are in climatology? Do you have any idea how much work is required for a PhD? Each person who earns a PhD has to basically write a book that is from there research with their own? You know when NASA does it studies, it works with tree and not the stuff it sends into space. You are a compete moron.
Loathomar 2 years ago
well that wasn't one sided at all LMAO....spin it any way you want it still smells bad......it is a FRAUD and a LIE....and now no one believes so save your lame excuses "reporter"
linkin622 2 years ago
Does human activity effect the planet? Of course, that is all ecosystems, including climate and the rise and/or fall of global temperatures. However, when anyone, such as the scientist interviewed here begin to use verbiage like he doesn't understand how hundreds of people can maintain a conspiracy simultaneously over time, is a sure sign that a conspiracy exists.
mesoanarchy 2 years ago
Pirie Reis Map shows that antarctica was free of ice only HUNDREDS of years ago. The scientists believe that antarctica was covered in miles deep ice for THOUSANDS of years. The map mapper didn't have modern technology to look deep into the ice. He just mapped the continent by the same method all map makers do...observation. How does that fit into the "facts" that these scientists are arguing?
Rata4You 2 years ago
The Pirie Reis Map shows an Antarctica was free of ice??? The reason the Pirie Reis Map if it is of south America and Antarctica it shows no waterway between South America and Antarctica. Meaning the someone drew this map in 4000BC or before. That is what is so odd about the map. To be what is looks like, it would need to be drawn in the last ice age. It was WAY to much ice not too little.
Loathomar 2 years ago
Somebody drew the map 4000 BC? Strange that our history books teach us that sailing across the pacific and antlantic ocean first took place hundreds of years ago. But I don't agree with historians on this either. Humans have sailed across the oceans for THOUSANDS of years. Scientists said antarctica was covered in ice for 1 million years...now they say 9000 years...and now they are reconsidering that too with the Pirie map and all. Can they make up their mind??
Rata4You 2 years ago
Well yes, that would be why the map is so strange and why it provokes some much interest. No historian can place an culture in the area of large scale sea travel in 4000 BC. Other people say the map shows mythical island of Antillia and possibly Japan. But no, other then you, say it shows a ice free Antarctica. And I would like to see the artical that showed scientist saying something that was found to be 9000 years old which they claimed to be 1 million. Carbon dating is your friend.
Loathomar 2 years ago 2
Dude, the northern portion of antarctica Queen Maud Land in Antarctica was indeed mapped. The map was drawn in 1513 (copied from an earlier map). Cook got the credit for it's discovery - in the 1700's even though it was already mapped.
Carbon dating would have worked had somebody back in the day had the forsight of carbon dating technology and brought back a sample for you to use.
Rata4You 2 years ago
Gore refuses to debate Climate Change.
watch?v=BEPFmwvqdDo&NR=1
iknownothingnow 2 years ago 2
Youre video doesnt exist.
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
This one should work.
watch?v=BEPFmwvqdDo
iknownothingnow 2 years ago
Yup. That one worked. Thanks!
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
The Global Warming scientists should all be put in jail for the biggest scientific conspiracy hoax of the century.
kevo4369 2 years ago 6
And statistics say that 85% of of all statistics are made up. So is your number.
jalexoid 2 years ago 2
So basically, they have to report the conspiracy theorists and the actual scientists? If you're not a scientist, stay the f****k out of the issue.
And can you imagine how HARD it is to find a SCIENTIST that is a climate change skeptic? I have not yet met a single scientist* climate change skeptic.
* - out of ecologists, biologists and geologists.
jalexoid 2 years ago
You're raising on a busted flush. Bummer for you
danmanjones 2 years ago
There are over 700 scientists who are climate change skeptics.
If you cant find them, then youre not looking hard enough.
MeLikeGoFast 2 years ago
" climate changed never so fast = "fact" " - Yes it did, but never "naturally". Mostly due to a comet hitting the planet or a super volcano erupting. Both, btw, tend to release a huge number of blocking particles(and/or CO2) into the atmosphere.
jalexoid 2 years ago
Wake up zombies, the scientists community has recently new data and proof, The earth is flat, and if you dont convert to the new world order of corporate capitalism you will fall off the edge. Climate change is the biggest Joke of the 21century and they did nothing to protect us.
14842 2 years ago
Another lame attempt to continue the global climate scam. The real funny news.
captquest1 2 years ago 2
@pythag123 wrote the following in defense of tyranny.
1. "huge chunks of the planet don't have enough money to buy the food "
True they are starving, but only because food cost have DOUBLED in the last 5 years due to ethanol production (using food as fuel)
2. "Global weapons industry worth $1,000 billion"
Actually more, whats your point? Nations should not defend themselves?
putittogether 2 years ago
"Global weapons industry worth $1,000 billion" lolz The US spends $613 Billion per year without including wars.
Loathomar 2 years ago
JayPhilosopher : written like a true lying, misleading, ignorant, bigoted bitch.
putittogether 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Good report. The stolen and absurdly edited, out of context, emails represent another smear campaign by deranged crackpots who oppose the scientific evidence that global warning is real and a serious problem.
These people minimizing the danger are often creationists or have other ideo-political agendas for their views.
Intelligent and reasonable people understand that the climatologists are correct.
The accelerating melting of artic glaciers is all the proof any reasonable person needs.
JayPhilosopher 2 years ago
lol
captquest1 2 years ago 2
I pulled my annual funding for the RealNews, a few months ago for another story they did, that was so misleading, it made me literally, sick.
This story only confirms my decision.
putittogether 2 years ago 5
Wow, the RealNews is not news or real.
What a lying piece of garbage, This is horrible manipulation, and misleading reporting, by the RealNews. Then they interview Michael Brklacic , a KNOWN discreditable scientist on the climate science.
This whole coverage this story is just a travesty for the FACTS.
The RealNews is NOT REAL OR NEWS.
putittogether 2 years ago 5
Really, what has Michael Brklacich published that has been shown to be falsified? I mean he is Professor and Chair of Geography and Environmental Studies at Carleton U. But hey, we can lesson to Lord Christopher Monckton cause he has his diploma in ... journalism
Loathomar 2 years ago
Loathomar wrote: "Michael Brklacich published that has been shown to be falsified"
I did not say he published anything, next...
putittogether 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We the people that never drank your Kool-Aid" from the start were called "deniers".
Now that we have HARD documentation that proves that global warming was and STILL IS nothing but a farce, we deniers will come together and let OUR voices be heard to oppose you vermin.
May those that push global warming and the lies, ROT IN HELL!!! Your days are numbered.
tomjohnson2009 2 years ago
Glad to see other people here agree- this report is a bias load of shit
arigosethrin 2 years ago 6
Unreal News II - Shame on this channel again
srgh12 2 years ago 8
look at the sun and position of the earth and its magnetic field dummy.. Its all due to solar activity .Why you want to hide this unmistakable truth? All your effort in calculating predicting numbers are a waste of time as no factor is constant but always changing. You guys cant even predict the weather. Fact scientists weather man are just guessing and gabling and like any prayer 50 % will come true and 50 % fail.
14842 2 years ago
Thanks - your are the only one who explains climatgate!
gifteconomy12 2 years ago
what a fuckin idiot. too many people for a conspiracy? have you ever heard of the Manhattan Project? you call yourself a professor? at Carleton? haha! fuckin tools
bob733333 2 years ago 4
RealNews you are losing your credibility!
Stop making these hitpieces!
wearechangeholland 2 years ago 4
Kudos to the hackers. It was more than 2-3 lines.
They lied since 1961 and forced those that don't agree out of the clique.
Paetaor 2 years ago 11
Blah blah blah. Stick to the script boys.
StalinsLoveChild 2 years ago 5
what would it be like if i had high blood pressure, but then i broke my arm skydiving? what if i just caught a cold and it went away in about a week? should i see the doctor then?
bronco2121 2 years ago
Neither is there any mention in this report of the fact that these e-mails have been sent to the BBC 5 weeks before the story came out on the various conspiracy channels and they refused to report on it.
Only now that the story is out there they have no other choice than to report on it and try to defuse the situation by using their usual techniques of manipulating the news so people don't have to form an opinion of their own or do any investigating work.
Uenbg 2 years ago 3
I think Russia Today has handled it pretty well. They have an equal amount of speaking time for both sides of the argument and I haven't seen their reporter taking sides or shrewdly suggesting an opinion (like making remarks that the e-mails were stolen).
The e-mails and scientific data should have been public knowledge in the first place and have been requested under the freedom of information act, but the government put a stop to that request. No mention of that in this report.
Uenbg 2 years ago 3
"errr hackers hacked into the errr email system err err" hackers hacked into the computer system that contains the email system, if it was just the email system they wouldnt have got hold of other files and the computer code for these models commented by the coder with informative comments get your facts right "THE REAL NEWS" I thought you were the real news but obviously youre biased too
TheOriginalJoeBloggs 2 years ago
yeah real news. get someone from the ipcc to explain the email. very one sided and you can tell their own opinion in the news reports voice. just cuz you put real before news doesnt make it real or news. its good to hear another side but the other side has been the side everyone has heard about for the past 10 years.
itubeonu 2 years ago
This event is useful to determin which media outlets use marketing/brain influencing techniques though.
Every media outlet that somehow tries to pretend that these e-mails mean very little, that they were stolen (making the hackers look bad), and more remarks like that, only shows that that particular media outlet can't be trusted and is probably owned by the same corporations/people behind the NWO.
Seeing this video shows you can't trust this media outlet, good to know.
Uenbg 2 years ago
That is exactly what I was thinking. Once you know how the magician does the trick, he can't fool you any more. The more they twist the truth using propaganda methods the more they show their true colors and expose themselves for who they really are.
Read about [overcoming the trickster, media wars of the 21st century] for some helpful information on how to spot these shills.
3190423 2 years ago
EXCELLENT work Paul Jay, the RealNews, as usual.
However, it is not just the 'credibility of three or four scientists' that is at stake here. It's the credibility of the entire scientific community, which is seen as playing politics once again.
No one can say that they didn't have it coming, though.
MarquisdeBarrabas 2 years ago