Added: 10 months ago
From: StephenHitler
Views: 4,320
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (48)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • political parodies for the win!

  • Are all these bright people who want a carbon tax aware of what they breathe? Do you want to do something to fight rising co2 levels? Plant a bloody tree morons.

  • The truth about elections.

    Its not who votes that counts. Its who counts the votes.

    Joe Stalin

  • Not a problem we`ll take it from the seniors.

    I fucking lol`d

  • When is Iceland gonna be presented with an offer to join Canada now that Kyoto has been rejected?

    It makes so much more sense than paying a carbon tax

  • I never get tired of these..lol..,

  • I'm german. Not funny at all.

  • Jack Layton is one of us

  • 40% in a 5+ party election is a very strong mandate. Yeah, most Canadians do approve of the job he's doing right now. 63.5 of Canadians say they are happy with current direction Canada is going. I know I'm happy and can't stand the alternatives at the moment.

  • When did 40% become a majority. And NO! Most Canadians DONT want him in power. Fuck I hate conservative thinking. It simply wrong!

  • @jonesyboypoom If most Canadians didn't want a conservative government , they wouldn't have voted for a conservative government, you putz.

  • @MrBrational If Harper had won a true majority he would have received more than 39%. It's simple math jack-ass!!! 100%-39%=61%..., Yes! 61% of Canadians didn't vote for Harper you bleach drinking moron!

  • @allendista Boo Hoo, you can hope for your handouts next time around.

  • @allendista No one party has had a true majority since 1980. That person was Brian Mulroney.

  • @allendista yea well maybe if more people bothered to vote things woulda been diffrent huh? and thats because we have a first past the post system..... and 61% of voters didnt all vote for the same party.. they voted for sepreate parties....... i mean sure harpers a little to hung up on military but still...... if u dont want him to win then get some more support for ur damn party -.-

  • @blackdawn88655 That's what we did you jackass.

  • @allendista oviously not enough support... if u um DIDNT WIN... >> an im not talking to u. u sound very uneducated.... -.- i dont argue with uneducated people. sides i dont exactly know what im talking about im 15 -.- im just going by what i heard so calm down...... jeez.....

  • @blackdawn88655 If you don't know what you are talking about, then shut your pie hole and go read a book or just listen. After you do that then you can have an 'educated' opinion.

  • @allendista funny thing is... u sound alot more uneducated then i do. because oviously u weren't listening to your social teacher in grade 9. we use a first past the post system in canada. its better then the other systems and 61% of voters that didnt vote for harper voted, green, NDP, or liberal. the 39% that voted for harper is a majority because it is the biggest group of united voters. -_- can u please attempt to sound smart at least?

  • @blackdawn88655 The last guys to get hefty majorities of the vote were Mulroney and Chretien. Sure we have a first past the post system you nitwit BUT what we are arguing here is that 39% is not a mandate. Harper has not been able to repeat a conservative vote of 50% plus in the ' 84 election with 212 seats and/or 43% in the ' 88 election election. He hasn't come close by a country mile. You should've payed attention in your grade 8 history class.

  • @allendista well thing is, ive never learnt about past prime ministers. and "history" class no longer exists..... its called social studies.. in grade 8 the curriculum was Japan, aztecs, and Renaissance's I'll agree though, its not always a fair way of doing things, but if jack layton had one, well we'd be stuck with his stand in seeing as he died. (RIP) i do think he spends to much money on military. you know alberta is financally supporting 80% of the country?! how is that fair.

  • @jonesyboypoom

    When did 40% become a majority? About the year 1867.

    It isn't "conservative thinking", dumbass. If you party had won more than 50% of seats in the country like the conservatives did, you wouldn't be bitching right now.

  • Last time I checked Harper won a majority.

    Pound salt commies.

  • LOL I just received adds from the Bloc lol sad but true

  • @mortalweedbath666 its so stupid, they dont have any of there campaign in english, so no english first langague person will vote for them.... unless everysingle person in quebec votes unamonously for bloc, they wont win -__-

  • The one where hitler goes to sturgis is better.................I like Harper and if he ever leaves i hope Ralph Kline runs

  • I liked it

  • lYour attempt at humor is sad.

  • Hitler was a Socialist

  • @yukoncornileus4 Nationalist Socialist Anti Jew= NAZI

  • @yukoncornileus4

    Oh for god's sake.... He was extremely anti-socialist... Maybe you should research the opposition to the nazi party at the time (an actual socialist party)... maybe you should do some research on Adolf hitler's views... He hated communists and jews basically equally... I can't stand when people read the word "socialist" in the word nazi, and think they actually were socialists... It's beyond ludicrous. You basically have no idea what fascism is, or any of hitler's views are.

  • @PringDaddyPring Well it is much more than the name, although the National Socialist German Workers Party was a very fitting name. The Nazis before the war were very progressive, they put in the richest welfare state the world had ever seen, welfare for the poor, make work projects for the un-employed, dramatically increased the role of the state in education, you my have heard of on of them, kindergarten, meaning children's garden, North America copied, didn't even change the name.

  • @PringDaddyPring Before the Nazis took power the stood shoulder to shoulder in the Reichstag with the Communists they voted almost identically, the right wing old fashioned conservatives were on the other side. They fought for the same demographic as the the Communists, young socialist radicals. Fascism is socialism for one nationality, even today, look at the economic plan of a Fascist/Nazi party, very close to the NDP, nationalizing banks, more government control ect.

  • @PringDaddyPring Hitler and Mussolini if you asked them they would have told you they were socialists, if fact they said so many times. They just weren't international socialists. Fascism, communism and Nazism are all socialist cousins, freedom is their opposite. The difference between the hell of Nazi Germany and the hell of the Soviet Union is about the difference between a concentration camp and a gulag. Don't be fooled by 80 year old communist propaganda.

  • @yukoncornileus

    Ugh I don't even know why I'm arguing about this. Everything you said is blatantly incorrect... It's not worth debating since I'd have every history department at every university taking my side You'd have Glenn Beck.. Mussolini specifically designed fascism as a "solution to the communist wave". The Nazi's were simply a German nationalist party.They threw out little "socialist" favors to some white people. seeing as hitler had communists killed in a fashion similar to jews...

  • @PringDaddyPring Everything I said is wrong, that is funny, maybe you should put some meat on the bones of your arguments. I think it is not so much about your leftist professors or what Glen Beck says, but what Hitler and Mussolini said themselves, both said they were socialists many many times. Hitler said he was the third way, not capitalism, not the crazy Bolshevikism but something in between, British Labour used the same line just recently.

  • @yukoncornileus

    Hitler said he was a "socialist" but did you ever hear his version of socialism?! it's COMPLETELY different from ANYTHING Marx said.that's the point.. He used the word and redefined it... He was all about private property rights, etc.. He said "I'm a socialist... but I hate Marxism".. today's socialism is all about the "workers of the world"... which is obviously marxism. which hitler an Mussolini both hated. You don't have a leg to stand on in this argument.

  • @PringDaddyPring There is more than one kind of socialism, just as there is more than one kind of Christianity. Hitler hardly loved Anglo-American style capitalism. Mussolini said I was born a socialist and I will die a socialist. They where welcomed by they left before the war. Mussolini even went to Hollywood to make a movie in hour of his greatness. Time magazine loved them both, Hitler man of the year. The left was quite racist back then, and is today, look at the Jew haters at the Occupy

  • @yukoncornileus woah, buddy. citations needed. You got a lot more opinions than facts in what you say. 1st off Jews haters at the Occupy? Where? Many Jews are part of the movement. And if there are some, should we paint the entire movement with the same brush. Also, seems the anti-semitic clip was taken out of context watch?v=NEPgAp5Mkyc. Lastly, if you think Hitler was a Marxist than your history has failed you. He jailed Marxist, went to war with. Specifically Marxists. An wasn't Marx a Jew?

  • @yukoncornileus

    Seriously.. Every heard of Mein Kampf?! it's all about how he hates jews and marxists... I can't stress this enough.. he used the word socialist... but Redefined it to some extreme right wing ideology.. I can't stand people who say Hitler was a socialist.. He was his "own version" of a socialist.. Which isn't a marxist at all.. Additionally, he wasn't some huge economic failure.. Just a racist nutbag.. so I'm not even slamming his economics...

  • @PringDaddyPring The first philosopher to ever say that a whole race of people had to be eliminated, the Jews, was Karl Marx. you have to admit that is alot to have in common. Marx was a big inspiration for a young Hitler. Yes he was his own version of a socialist, I agree, that is why they are cousins, but certainly not opposites. Most of today's left don't want to nationalize everyone's house of farm, but to have Hitlers control of big finance and big business, they would love it.

  • @yukoncornileus You are such an idiot! LOL!!! Karl Marx was Jewish you Fox News watching bleach-drinking halfwit.

  • @allendista Name calling is so small. Yes Marx was a Jew, so what, many Jews hate Jews, Israel has a kooky left wing who want the destruction of Israel. Just look at the number of white people who hate whites.

  • So funny, thats a good idea we should put harper on the loonie the queens has been on there to long

    

  • Ok this is hilarious, and brilliant!

    Kudos to the creator, nothing short of creative genius :-D

    Don't forget to mention the CETA

    Beware the CETA

    that's the icing on the Conservative cake

  • When it was all said and done, Harper ' Hitler' ( in the imagination of the poster ) didn't have anything to worry about. The NDP brought down the Liberals NOT the Conservatives. Harper got a MAJORITY and the NDP is in the hat in hand position. The NDP is the ' opposition' in name only and they can't hold the threat of forming a coalition with the Liberals and the separatist Bloc party over the people who voted Conservative

    The NDP took their shot and the recoil knocked them on their asses

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more