It is not easy to get a doctorate. you do not have to go to college to be a scientists. All it takes is the scientific method, research and testing. anyone can write a scientific paper.
11. Find any part of human history where religion has made something good. Or ok, something else... -Find evidence of an angel, heaven, hell, afterlife, god, the devil. Or something not conradictory on the bible... HECk... ANYTHING. They are supossed to be "EVERYWHERE" Huh?
12 Just avoid ridicule... Just that.
13 Try to writhe an honest peace of work with what you find, and send it both to vatican and the cientific community.
14 try making any of those two to publish your "thing"
16. You won't get anything... Perhaps you'll die waiting.
Now... WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THIS VIDEO?
Saying god exists is equally silly as saying it does't. You just can't deny evolution.
Belive in a superior being if you want. But NEVER ever believe in "RELIGION" it has be in the path of evolution and it only benefit people at vatican... NOT YOU. NOT ANYONE.
a precambrian rabit? impossible! ridiculous, and laughable! why, they would not have even been able to survive! and don't give me any "that's not what evolution says" bull, because if they could have survived, they wouldn't have been common rabbits, and fossil evidence would show that.
@SeekingTruth1234 Evolution does not have anything to do with the origin of life or the universe. You have just used the common theist strawman to make us look stupid. May be you should do some research your damn self before you tell anyone else to.
Scientists interpret the evidence according to their world view in the realm of evolution for evolution is not science ....you evil ones take evolution and give it credibility by stamping it as science when it is not.
@j919or blah blah blah. It IS science. Acording to your "world view" It is a lie. But to me what you probably believe it's just that, beliefs and lies, evil one.
@RichtoffenRoach You spoke truthfully. No one knows how life came to be. And bc of irreducable complexity it is impossible for it to evolve from non life. IOW only an all powerful designer couldve created life. The flagella and the complex proteins in each cell are mind boggling.
@j919or INDEED!!! I find life so fascinating =D How life came to be? I don't know but Sometimes I do think that there must be a creator, laws of physics, subatomic t :')particles, atoms biological molecules is so amazing. For me? doesn't matter if he created it. Just enjoy it. And forgive me for me for my past comments, I am going thru something had :'(
@j919or wth are you talking about? "random energy"? "destroys order"? Are you trying to use the 2nd law of thermodynamics as an argument? Because you've completely butchered it...
@j919or I'm trying to understand your comment, cuz it doesn't make sense. I wrote "energy destroys complexity" on google and it corrected me with "entropy destroys complexity", now this statement makes sense, but is that what you're talking about? The least you can do is elaborate..
@j919or Energy destroys complexity ? Basic material science says you are wrong. You can create massively complex structures simply by mixing atoms together and adding energy (heat) to them. We can make crystals that way where almost every single atom is aligned into the structure (except for impurities, holes, structure defects).
@ivanlagrossemoule Well that is not complexity but random patterns. You can hange the properties of a liquid with heat and ice will form and it will form in a way that is molded by other forces like gravity. There is complexity innate to atoms and molecules.
@ivanlagrossemoule ""It's very far from random"" Mutations are mistakes. What could be more random than mistakes? Does one plan to make mistakes hoping that good will come? You are duped and evil bc u want to be duped to avoide submitting ur life to God.
Either the universe is eternal OR Its Creator is eternal OR there are an infinite number of Creators. You decide. Im going with the One eternal Creator. I experience Him every day from the age of 21 to now. And the more I soften up ot his leading and control the better it gets. Yall are so missing out.
i like this and ive read comments, and i dont think anyone gets it. its just calling for someone to do as much work as someone who is researching evolution but instead disprove it with concrete proof. very well done sir
@SeekingTruth1234 Are you arguing for irreducible complexity? If you are, that has been debunked. If you had read some of the scientific papers on the matter, you would know that.
Somehow your "16 easy steps to beat an evolutionist" turned into "16 work-intensive and time-consuming steps to winning a Nobel Prize". Perhaps something was lost in translation. Or maybe I was just too busy spotting all the spelling and grammatical errors in a video which was (somewhat ironically) telling me I'm not as smart as I think I am.
Two easy ways to defeat an evolutionist...... Pick up a book or surf a website explaining evolution (origin of species, etc, talk origins dot org) and try to understand your opponents position for yourself instead of regurgitating lies from a convicted felon, formulate your thoughts and look for inconsistencies in evolution. Also have respect for science as the simple fact you are on a computer is a clear example that its a important part of modern society.
This video is more than illogical...it is foolishness.....so much so that it demands a like response.....therefore....Sir, I fart in your general direction.
Step 7 and on is impossible in today's "closed" scientific community and you know it you liar. The current scientific community is the modern day "medieval catholic church" where the only correct view is the one that the "higher ups" have agreed on. Falsehoods and error abound for years in this kind of closed system. There aren't any proper checks and balances due to the lack of ability to see past the box science has put itself in. TRUTH!
@vhayes8886 I'm reasonably certain the author is aware that his post is pro-evolution, but I would be interested to read about the pre-cambrian rabbit, if you can point me in the right direction
who needs answers, aka science.. i believe that a cosmic jewish carpenter, who was his own father, can make me live forever if i symbolicaly drink his blood and eat his flesh and telepathicaly accept him as my master so he can remove an evil force from my soul that apparently i was born with because a woman made out of a clay mans rib was tricked by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.. or you could just say you dont know how everthing came to be, and continue the quest for knowledge...
@SeekingTruth1234 I know we know nothing,>> But you know that. EVOLUTION IS NOT SCIENCE. You preach the right thing sir,... we don`t know... but you act like you know. I saw an interview of an Anglican bishop on TV recently. Somebody asked him if there was an afterlife and if so what evidence: Reply: I don`t know if there is an afterlife. Nobody ever returned from the death, I believe in God`s eternal love.... One of the rare christians humble enough to admit. WE DON`T KNOW.
@SeekingTruth1234 Christianity is still in the forefront of obstruction of science and progress. Started with toilet paper, it fought against lightning rods, cremation, anatomy, autopsie,condoms,in-vitro, stem-cell research, organ transplant, and now EVOLUTION. But it never fought murder, as long as it was in the bible.
@SeekingTruth1234 Your god if he exists is a killer:Witches, kill them. Homosexuals, kill them.fortunetellers, kill them. those who don`t listen to priests, kill them. those hitting their dad, kill them. those who curse their parents, kill them, adulterers, kill them. fornicators, kill them. people who believe in other religions, kill them. non-believers,kill them. fals prohets ,kill them. blasphemers, kill them. those who work on the Sabbath, kill them. This is the word of god !!
@SeekingTruth1234 Creation in Genesis is so dumb, so infantile, that from the 106 colleges, which form the " Christian Coalition of Colleges " only 5 teach litteral biblical creation. How can you be so dumb as to expect observing macro evolution in a lab, a process that takes millions of years ? Micro evolution has been proven.
There is some really flawed logic behind this video. Human beings are sentient creatures, fully capable of learning from and manipulating their environment. You don't have to be a scientist to understand evolution. All you need to do is review the peer reviewed, published materials to grasp the theory, and review the many facts that have been found to support the theory. The logic here is that you have to be a writer to know how to read, and that doesn't make sense.
@SeekingTruth1234... Are you familiar with the mouse trap dribble hailed as evidence against evolution? I don't admit all functions are needed. I don't admit that if you remove, lets say a spring, that it will cease to function. You fail to understand that it is still a mouse trap with just one piece. Maybe it didn't catch mice at first. Maybe over time it adapted by creating a spring and set some bait out. Mice liked the bait so it became a mouse trap.U R a god of the gaps man. Deal with it !
@SeekingTruth1234... Are you familiar with the mouse trap dribble hailed as evidence against evolution? I don't admit all functions are needed. I don't admit that if you remove, lets say a spring, that it will cease to function. You fail to understand that it is still a mouse trap with just one piece. Maybe it didn't catch mice at first. Maybe over time it adapted by creating a spring and set some bait out. Mice liked the bait so it became a mouse trap.U R a god of the gaps man. Deal with it !
i never claimed to b a scientest but i have witnesses what science has done for the world both good & bad. I do see through the false stories that the bible which is obviously written by man tells it's followers.Faith is weak & achieves nothing but self gratification. Its impossible to proove something doesn't exsist because it doesn't exsist plain & simple.You go through your life blined by religion & find comfort with others who believe the same crap as you. Maybe 1 day u will c the real light
@SeekingTruth1234 oh i see so u only believe what science says when it suits you. No surprises there. typical god lovers kings of hypocracy. Do u believe in the tooth fairy as well. GOD is a myth an no more
how to win a debate with christians hands down. IF adam & Eve were the only 2 people created by god (the rest of us bweing made via fucking) explain me this
1) why so many different races (if white men turned in2 black men that would consitute as evolution.
2)if adam & eve were the only 2 people that means incest would have taken place. (maybe that explains why so many preists molest young boys)
@theELUSIV I am not sure that you can win a debate with Christians using the Adam and Eve incest argument. The fact that Adam and Eve spawned a world of inbreds with all the associated deformations would explain the very existence of religion itself.
@SeekingTruth1234 I'll help you with your thoughts. Bacteria cells have a flagellum. You would argue that neither cell nor flagellum work without each other. This is ignorance. Both work, just not well. Look up the silly mouse trap crap creationalist believe helps their argument. A mouse trap works to catch a mouse with only one piece (you can pick the piece) Over time a mouse might trip and die on it. This doesn't mean its not a mouse trap its just not a very good one. good luck thinking
You do not need a university doctorate in order to understand and repeat the scientific facts to everyone else. Its not hard to understand, artyfarty.
There are thousands of people like this on youtube that ask questions about evolution. I`ve seen a comment below that asked how could evolution explain the dance of the bees. And there are millions of similar questions. My answer to all of them is: READ about evolution, study it. Don`t make an opinion about it without knowing what it states. Then these questions will have to disappear, unless you are an idiot.
I believe in Christ...but uh...I must agree with any of the evolutionists with the fact that this argument wasn't that great...work harder (btw, if you followed your steps and thats all you got...err....*pats on back*) keep it up... :)
I was disappointed. I thought one of the steps would've been "Hit Evolutionist over the head with brick, then when he doesn't respond to questions, declare yourself the winner of the debate"!!!
I don't think many of you know what the video is about. The poster wants creationists to research and learn about science (particularly biology) to prove evolution is false if they can. Thus winning the debate against an evolutionist.
Well, I've watched the 3' 17" clip, I see no part 2 and I'm still wondering how to win a debate against an evolutionist. By the way, I'm not a scientist and yet I have a clear enough understanding of gravity to know not to walk off a tall building. I understand light speed, black holes, tidal flow, pollination, DDD and the failure of anulus fibirus tissue. I did not learn this stuff through the bible. The Bible taught, incest, genocide and predjudice. The main character is jealous & spitefull.
@Avidcomp You know the Bibly is a compilation of books right? There are many main characters and many stories about different things.. Like Chow says. "Damn read a book or something"
1. Stop assuming you have personal relationship with Jesus where you really don't. He's dead for over 2000 years and you never saw him before. <- FACT
2. Stop assuming the people you love and trust something about Christ when they really don't
3. We don't think religious people don't lie. In fact, they lie their asses off. Even to themselves.
4. I agree with latter points you made. But I can also tell the Christians to kill each other so they will go to heaven to prove they're right themselves.
First of all evolution is just the theory we have dug up the dinosaurs but not that damn missing link. or the missing link could be link this *snap* and the EVOLUTION.
@GeniusAtheist Er... it's a theory. You just don't understand what "theory" means. Look it up. On the other hand "creationism" is not a theory, it's not even a valid "hypothesis" (look it up).
As W. Pauli would say, "Not only is it not right, it's not even wrong!"
@d3fau1thmph they call it a theory but in reality it is a law that is bound to all creatures on earth i myself find that this theory is proven enough to point that you can consider it a law
1. Not trying to explain things that I don't understand. I know what I know, things that don't make sense, don't make sense.
2. Refer to part 1. / If you know that they don't know anything about science, then you are saying that you know more about science because you know what they are saying is false.
A Precambrian rabbit is a HYPOTHETICAL fossil. The oldest rabbit fossil found is 53 million years old, not 4600 million years old. Which is the age of the Precambrian era. Finish school kid.
first instruction: deny the posibility of the existency of God.
second. deny any sobrenatural phenomena (like life after death) although there is now this new theory about multiple universes oh yeah now what do you do!
debate against religions even knowing religions are just like Atheism (man made)
You are a Blind follower my friend, you have a prophet (dawkins) the re is no difference from a religious extremist. (your doctrine is a mess of hate and rejection).
@PQUINTA6 Interesting. The word Atheism comes from the Greek word "Atheos" which simply means "without god". How on earth can you describe a state of mind as "man made"? That statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
what I am asking is at least "one 5.5 number. And there is not. Theay are all 5 or 6. You talk just like a fanatic : whatever you cant justify, "is Silly"
Atheist and religious doctrines are the same. Both have blind followers and political leaders. Both lpotencially can lead to extremism.
@PQUINTA6 you just want one ? take a pick -Homo neanderthalensis -H. heidelbirgensis -H. Erectus -H. habilis -Australopithecus Africanus And these are just the once i can remember. ALL are transitional forms in short, Its your ignorance that gets in the way of seeing between 5 and 6 Also if you would bother all the findings are open the repeatable experimentation, Thats how science works. Ok lets check out your next stupidity... If Atheism is a doctrine, what are its "holy" instructions. lol
@cptmuska no, he's saying that the only way to actually beat an evolutionist is to disprove evolution by finding a fossil that doesn't fit the evolutionary model, which no creationist has yet done. But they insist on just debating the point and they always lose because they can't disprove it. He's basically saying "If you're saying evolution is a lie but you can't disprove it then shut the fuck up"
@AntiMatterWave evolution is proven, just because you throw an unknow into the picture dosent make a lick of difference, it could be of random origin, no body knows, we have 2 draw on the conclusions we already. And what this video talks about have never happened
@cptmuska that's the point. The video is saying that no-one's ever actually won a debate against an evolutionist because they can't disprove it. And just in case you misunderstood, I myself am an evolutionist. Your statement that throwing an unknown into the picture makes no difference isn't exactly true, it doesnn't prove that evolution is fake, you're right about that, but it does prove that our current idea of evolution is wrong. But like has been said it's never happenned
@AntiMatterWave like has been said it's never happenned ?? so Evolution explanation is "methaforical" too??. Why dont you try to understand the real concept of God before debate egainst it?
Thre is not correlation in the fosils found. No fosils from the precambrian mammal to the rabit found in diferent stages that show the gradual proccess of transformation. Evolution has missing links.
@PQUINTA6 I'm not debating against god. Who mentioned god? don't try to put words in my mouth. When I said "like has been said it's never happenned" I meant that no contradictory fossils have been found. Why did you quote me as saying evolution is metaphorical? These so-called missing links are just a lack of spontaneous, massive changes in a slow, gradual process, that in itself explains their absence
Its fossil record that has missing links. lol, If only you knew how rare the conditions are to preserve a corpse for millions of years, or in fact knew how many already been found. What you are doing is like asking for a number between 5 and 6 and then after hearing 5.5, you ask for number between 5 and 5.5 and so on.. its silly.
In 20th century after the discovery of DNA, it became the strongest supporting case for evolution, fossils are eye candy. got it ?
@6Krys9 why is that ? ... is it because it looks like too much work for truth ? and you rather be a disingenuous prick and claim evolution is false ?
What this video is pointing out is that. If you have evidence to falsify evolution, just present it and if you are correct, apart from destroying the current model of evolution, you will also win a freaking Nobel price for such ground breaking discovery.
You clearly don't comprehend what science is. Why should we redo all research and republish it for peer review if it has already been done? That defeats the purpose of checking the facts and having your peers review it. We would never get anywhere in this world if everyone had to retest every proven principle. I guess you have no comprehension of gravity since you are not Isaac Newton. Jump off a bridge and see if the laws apply to you. Ignorance is easily overcome but stupidity lasts forever!!!
Irrelevant. He's just saying, we can't keep retesting science to be "absolutely sure." Isaac Newton was also an alchemist, but we don't use that against him. It's the strength of ideas, not the strength of the person behind them. Argument from authority.
@SonofJaphet Completely beside the point but since you bring it up here is a reply. Isaac Newton was a brilliant man but he lived before Darwin and therefor did not know any better. Here is a link to illustrate how Newton wasted his talents because of the god hypothesis.
youtube.com/watch?v=CMXHKixqOM8
Imagine what else he could have accomplished if it was not for his supernatural beliefs.
@DieterGribnitz The Fathers of modern science where creationists in fact today there are many of them but they keep it for themselves because they will face discrimination just like the 250 scientists who got their diploma refused because of their belief and they where among the best.Darwinism is a plague among the scientific community.You are in fact a religious person Dieter who believe in an ancient pagan folk tale disguised as science
@davelantor I know how evolution works but its only based on assumptions ,natural selection on the other hand is true and observable but a cat doesnt produce a non cat .As for going into insults i dont go there its too easy and it proves to me that those who use insults or foul language are not scientists but idolaters who worship man (Dawkinites)..Question how can evolution explain the way bees uses a dance to communicate between themselves?
@SonofJaphet " I know how evolution" .. i can easily debunk your statement.
"a cat doesnt produce a non cat", this statement clearly shows that your knowledge of evolutionary process is that of a typical creationist. gradual change over time means slight changes over time resulting in slow change of the group. For simple example, ring species, 2 SEPARATED groups of same animals over time accumulating slight changes over generations, and changes eventually leading to incompatible cross breeding.
@SonofJaphet (continuation of previous comment) This leads to speciation,.. 2 groups of animals that cant interbreed will gradually accumulate differences that set them apart from the other group.
There is no claim that "a cat" produced "a non cat" ...Since you dont understand how evolution works you end up making silly statements like " a cat doesnt produce a non cat", which is correct, but irrelevant and holds no weight to your argument since evolutionary progress doesnt claim contrary.
@SonofJaphet (continuation of previous comment 2) As for your question "how can evolution explain the way bees uses a dance to communicate between themselves". Since i am no evolutionary biologist or studied bee learning and communication, i will totally make guess work backed up by what little i read from text books. But i accept your challenge ;).
I will write you a PM about it, and if you are not satisfied or have questions or want to continue to argue about it, chose PM or Comments.
@SonofJaphet how can you say that you know how evolution works and still ask the question about the bees? evolution is based on assumptions are you serious? not even when Darwin lived evolution was not based on assumptions let alone now. you are talking about insults.. when a man argues with me saying that the earth is flat, how should i call him? you, doubting evolution is like doubting that the earth is round. if you have proof beyond reasonable doubt why don`t you believe? you haven`t read it
@andreiuta171 Dont make me laugh man NO creationists ever believed in Flat Earth ,its the evolutionists who invented this myth so that they can disredit the REAL scientists BTW in the Bible the Earth is ROUNDnot flat so shut the fuck up with it .There is no scientific breakthrough that came from evolutionists yet and evolutionists are afraid of us because we know the truth and the truth is that you re like ancient pagans who believe in a myth called evolution...Darwin did nt have a diploma
@SonofJaphet should i quote you? quote nr 1: "those who use insults or foul language are not scientists but idolaters who worship man" quote nr. 2: "in the Bible the Earth is ROUNDnot flat so shut the fuck up with it". you believe in god and you use those words?? nice. that`s what i thought of christians anyway. Evolution is proven beyond reasonable doubt. do you know what that means? no scientist is afraid of you. maybe they pity you but that`s all.
@SonofJaphet and the example with flat earth was just an example. i did not say that christians believed or not in a flat earth. i used it to make you understand something but it seems that you cannot understand anything. that`s why you would not understand evolution even if you read about it. i`m sorry for you. but hey, you can take comfort in the fact that ignorance is bliss, right?
HAHA! I came upon this video on a whim expecting some creationist diatribe and instead got a succinct and precise set of steps that fundie creationists not only will never take, but nearly all would never pass step 1. Nice work! Funny cuz it's true.
everything you see in our solar system was just star dust cloud spiraling around till it clumped together.the atoms in your finger will spin around each other the same way that two black holes will. the center two different galaxies both with black holes turn on a dime,to try and know and understand things from the very small to the very big, endless is for me to know, the rest of the world to catch up someday.NOT
How to win an argument against an evolutionist: You can't. You're an idiot. I am sorry that you don't understand science, however, I would suggest going back to school.
@MrWAZZAPDUDE There are so many bias against huamn evolution.....can you tell me why human being evolved for two millions years after getting out of africa. and still we consider them as same as we..its an insult to human evolution..after all africans are 2 million behind us..no way in any other species developing in diffrent parts of world for millions of years were considered as same species..take example of lion n tiger..its a matter of shame that evolutinist hide thses facts
@hi5blast - "can you tell me why human being evolved for two millions years after getting out of africa." - Evolution is precisely what evolutionary theory predicts. We continue to evolve today at the same glacial pace as ever.
@hi5blast - "two millions years after getting out of africa. and still we consider them as same as we."
No, we don't. Google "timeline of human evolution." All evidence indicates that modern humans didn't appear til about 200,000 years ago. Bipedal apes from the time period you mention are called homo erectus and neandertal and were significantly different from us. Africans and Europeans share common ancestors, just like lions and tigers do. It's really not that hard.
@bjjolley hahahahah...yes thats what i mean to say..human were not developed fully into modern human while crossing africa 2 million years ago...which means human developed seprately in asia europe africa for 2 million years...
and these home eretus etc develepoed in africa same as human in europe/asia...
amazing....scientist cant state these facts..becuase then it will be rascism...
@hi5blast - Two MAJOR problems with your conclusions.
1) Migration of modern humans did not begin 2M years ago. Homo sapiens began dispersing "only" 100,000 years ago, and adaptations such as size, blood cell shape and pigmentation began to diverge almost immediately. While still similar, isolated populations did not evolve "the same."
2) Even if your conclusion was correct, it says nothing about the truth value of creationism.
You'd earn a Nobel prize if your claim had merit. It doesn't.
@hi5blast then do you think the earth was the same like 1million years ago? there is a type of fish with legs... and scientists have seen cells change while they multiply and adapt to a cold environment. same to a hot one. and tigers and lions are basically the same...they can reproduce together....the bible does say that every aspect of evolution is fail..."in the beginning, god created man"...thats big bullshit
All 16 of your points can be thrown down the pan if you just look at the most recent outbreak of E.Coli in Europe, an entirely new strain; never seen before. Or of course you can look at the common flu, which evolves all the time. For example; every flu pandemic of the 20th century was caused by the appearance of a new strain of the virus in humans. Or you could look at rats; they've become immune to many of our poisons due to EVOLOUTION. Undeniable proof; & you don't need to be a scientist.
@MegaLolburger its called a new strain of E.Coli for a reason idiot.
that is because its a new strain of E.Coli. not from different gene pools, its just resistant to what we currently use against it.
this is due to mutations that are slowly and gradually changing the structure of the bacteria. We still identify it as E.Coli because its showing the same effects as all known E.Coli strain and has minor changes.
and the strongest survive, and mutation that gives better protection helps survival.
@davelantor Have you responded to the wrong comment? Those E.coli are still from the same gene pool as the previous form of E.coli, I never said otherwise and my argument was about Apes and Humans. We evolved from a common ancestor yet we are from a different gene pool than an Ape. If you have a problem with what I said go take it up with any scientist who studies evolution. Think before you type.
@MegaLolburger Sry, when looked at it in form of timeline when you said ( It's because they are from a different gene pool.) it looks as if it was referring to different strains of E.coli.
Looked like this when read fast :
' That new E.coli is resistant to drugs used against old E.coli because they are from different gene pools.'
- so my response was to that, :P .. which indeed not something you had said.
My apologies.
ps. i also said "not from different gene pools" ;)
It is not easy to get a doctorate. you do not have to go to college to be a scientists. All it takes is the scientific method, research and testing. anyone can write a scientific paper.
ducetbomb 1 week ago
Almost everybodies a scientist
GawdnKountry 1 week ago
this title is misleading. It's really just how to make it so that no on can prove evolution unless they find the great fossil.
saibooba 1 week ago
1 Stop assuming you know ANYTHING about god when you CLEARLY NOT
Few people are priests, cult leaders. Most people belive JUST COUSE. And don't know why.
What are you? a Pope, a cult leader, average beliver guy?
2 Stop assuming anyone know something about religion. BECAUSE THEY WONT LET YOU JOIN (Unles you got LOTS OF MONEY)
3 Assume Cience CAN'T LIE (Otherwise it wouldn't be CIENCE)
4Who is Kent Hovind, and who is Albert Enstein, Isaac Newton, Tesla, Hawkins? (Just to name a few)
HenryQuienne 3 weeks ago
And how many of the latter went to jail?
5. Go to whereever they make you a "Father"
6Try to go to Italy
7Earn money, molest kids, tell us stories about unexisting people, (Become a cult leader)
8Wait till you are "of age" to become a "respectable" member of the church.
9 Win the respect of the likes of you, as... "One of them"
10 earn millions from the believers, so you know you're doing well your "career" as a cult leader. (May consider you as a Pope)
HenryQuienne 3 weeks ago
11. Find any part of human history where religion has made something good. Or ok, something else... -Find evidence of an angel, heaven, hell, afterlife, god, the devil. Or something not conradictory on the bible... HECk... ANYTHING. They are supossed to be "EVERYWHERE" Huh?
12 Just avoid ridicule... Just that.
13 Try to writhe an honest peace of work with what you find, and send it both to vatican and the cientific community.
14 try making any of those two to publish your "thing"
15 Wait a LOT.
HenryQuienne 3 weeks ago
And I mean A LLLLLLOT!
16. You won't get anything... Perhaps you'll die waiting.
Now... WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THIS VIDEO?
Saying god exists is equally silly as saying it does't. You just can't deny evolution.
Belive in a superior being if you want. But NEVER ever believe in "RELIGION" it has be in the path of evolution and it only benefit people at vatican... NOT YOU. NOT ANYONE.
HenryQuienne 3 weeks ago
a precambrian rabit? impossible! ridiculous, and laughable! why, they would not have even been able to survive! and don't give me any "that's not what evolution says" bull, because if they could have survived, they wouldn't have been common rabbits, and fossil evidence would show that.
demonofrazgriz333 4 weeks ago
@demonofrazgriz333 That's the point. A pre-cambrian rabbit would disprove evolution.
Toyomo16 1 week ago
@Toyomo16 but it couldn't happen.
demonofrazgriz333 1 week ago
HAHAHHA THIS IS FUCKING HILARIOUS! It doesn't even raise any good points!
GPow69 1 month ago
I think this describes welll who you are. A mindless douche who knows nothing about science. Go read a science book.
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
well... isn't this just the snarkiest little piece of provocation... Thumbs down for being a sarcastic anti-contributer.
zakquack 2 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Evolution does not have anything to do with the origin of life or the universe. You have just used the common theist strawman to make us look stupid. May be you should do some research your damn self before you tell anyone else to.
atheistjacob 2 months ago
i love how creationists have to make how to win agains evolutionists videos lol
evolutionists make similar videos thos i guess we just call them educational videos
coltsrule5150 2 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Actually irreducible complexity has been debunked. I will PM you a link to visit and read about it.
atheistjacob 3 months ago
Scientists interpret the evidence according to their world view in the realm of evolution for evolution is not science ....you evil ones take evolution and give it credibility by stamping it as science when it is not.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or blah blah blah. It IS science. Acording to your "world view" It is a lie. But to me what you probably believe it's just that, beliefs and lies, evil one.
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
@RichtoffenRoach Show me how evilution is science and not merely historical reconstruction. And I will show u how u are easily deceived by the MAN.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or Ohh Fuck you, MAN!! I am not in for this shit. Evolution is real and it goes againts of your beliefs, that's all. Now, leave e alone.
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
@RichtoffenRoach Prove that evolution is real. Have u seen it happen where one animal changes into another animal?
j919or 1 month ago
@RichtoffenRoach How do u think the first life first came into being?
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or I really would like to know. What I know is that I don't know anything.
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
@RichtoffenRoach You spoke truthfully. No one knows how life came to be. And bc of irreducable complexity it is impossible for it to evolve from non life. IOW only an all powerful designer couldve created life. The flagella and the complex proteins in each cell are mind boggling.
j919or 1 month ago
@j919or INDEED!!! I find life so fascinating =D How life came to be? I don't know but Sometimes I do think that there must be a creator, laws of physics, subatomic t :')particles, atoms biological molecules is so amazing. For me? doesn't matter if he created it. Just enjoy it. And forgive me for me for my past comments, I am going thru something had :'(
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
@j919or And because you do not understand something does not disprove anything.
RichtoffenRoach 1 month ago
2012 olympics logo for UK says ZION
pinball281 3 months ago
Random energy always destroys order. Without information and a machine to harness that info everrything goes from order to disorder.
Evolution cant happen. Its impossible but since scientists have nothing else they promote it.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or wth are you talking about? "random energy"? "destroys order"? Are you trying to use the 2nd law of thermodynamics as an argument? Because you've completely butchered it...
nejtilsvampe 3 months ago
@nejtilsvampe Irrelevant. Grow up! Energy destroys complexity. The 2nd law is about heat equilibirum, and if i didnt mention it what do u care?
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or I'm trying to understand your comment, cuz it doesn't make sense. I wrote "energy destroys complexity" on google and it corrected me with "entropy destroys complexity", now this statement makes sense, but is that what you're talking about? The least you can do is elaborate..
nejtilsvampe 3 months ago
@j919or Energy destroys complexity ? Basic material science says you are wrong. You can create massively complex structures simply by mixing atoms together and adding energy (heat) to them. We can make crystals that way where almost every single atom is aligned into the structure (except for impurities, holes, structure defects).
ivanlagrossemoule 3 months ago
@ivanlagrossemoule Well that is not complexity but random patterns. You can hange the properties of a liquid with heat and ice will form and it will form in a way that is molded by other forces like gravity. There is complexity innate to atoms and molecules.
j919or 3 months ago
@j919or Random patterns ? It's very far from random.
ivanlagrossemoule 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ivanlagrossemoule ""It's very far from random"" Mutations are mistakes. What could be more random than mistakes? Does one plan to make mistakes hoping that good will come? You are duped and evil bc u want to be duped to avoide submitting ur life to God.
j919or 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Either the universe is eternal OR Its Creator is eternal OR there are an infinite number of Creators. You decide. Im going with the One eternal Creator. I experience Him every day from the age of 21 to now. And the more I soften up ot his leading and control the better it gets. Yall are so missing out.
j919or 3 months ago
If your object is to "win a debate", then you are not looking to find any truth to begin with, and the debate is inherently pointless.
Ceminon 3 months ago
i like this and ive read comments, and i dont think anyone gets it. its just calling for someone to do as much work as someone who is researching evolution but instead disprove it with concrete proof. very well done sir
PBGellie 3 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Are you arguing for irreducible complexity? If you are, that has been debunked. If you had read some of the scientific papers on the matter, you would know that.
atheistjacob 3 months ago
Lol the funny thing is, when you do learn a lot you will be smart enough to know that religion is stupid
TheVideoGamer5x 3 months ago
Somehow your "16 easy steps to beat an evolutionist" turned into "16 work-intensive and time-consuming steps to winning a Nobel Prize". Perhaps something was lost in translation. Or maybe I was just too busy spotting all the spelling and grammatical errors in a video which was (somewhat ironically) telling me I'm not as smart as I think I am.
MrRazorz 3 months ago
Two easy ways to defeat an evolutionist...... Pick up a book or surf a website explaining evolution (origin of species, etc, talk origins dot org) and try to understand your opponents position for yourself instead of regurgitating lies from a convicted felon, formulate your thoughts and look for inconsistencies in evolution. Also have respect for science as the simple fact you are on a computer is a clear example that its a important part of modern society.
mucura1 3 months ago
This video is more than illogical...it is foolishness.....so much so that it demands a like response.....therefore....Sir, I fart in your general direction.
KJVWordofGod 3 months ago
I say there are some things we dont want to know, important things!
Drinapropriatetouch 3 months ago
Comment removed
DrSabaMD 4 months ago
Step 7 and on is impossible in today's "closed" scientific community and you know it you liar. The current scientific community is the modern day "medieval catholic church" where the only correct view is the one that the "higher ups" have agreed on. Falsehoods and error abound for years in this kind of closed system. There aren't any proper checks and balances due to the lack of ability to see past the box science has put itself in. TRUTH!
Iamajanitor01 4 months ago
@vhayes8886 Understood, thank you. But if you locate one, I would want to be the first to know. :-)
joedlang 4 months ago
@vhayes8886 I'm reasonably certain the author is aware that his post is pro-evolution, but I would be interested to read about the pre-cambrian rabbit, if you can point me in the right direction
joedlang 4 months ago
It's that step 11 that always throws me.
joedlang 4 months ago
who needs answers, aka science.. i believe that a cosmic jewish carpenter, who was his own father, can make me live forever if i symbolicaly drink his blood and eat his flesh and telepathicaly accept him as my master so he can remove an evil force from my soul that apparently i was born with because a woman made out of a clay mans rib was tricked by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree.. or you could just say you dont know how everthing came to be, and continue the quest for knowledge...
GeorgeNada1 4 months ago
Science vs: Religion...a FALSE dichotomy. Contrary to popular belief the two can actually coexist in perfect harmony.
-Proudly Catholic, AND I believe in dinosaurs!
rachelhelen19 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 I know we know nothing,>> But you know that. EVOLUTION IS NOT SCIENCE. You preach the right thing sir,... we don`t know... but you act like you know. I saw an interview of an Anglican bishop on TV recently. Somebody asked him if there was an afterlife and if so what evidence: Reply: I don`t know if there is an afterlife. Nobody ever returned from the death, I believe in God`s eternal love.... One of the rare christians humble enough to admit. WE DON`T KNOW.
ndzoko 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Christianity is still in the forefront of obstruction of science and progress. Started with toilet paper, it fought against lightning rods, cremation, anatomy, autopsie,condoms,in-vitro, stem-cell research, organ transplant, and now EVOLUTION. But it never fought murder, as long as it was in the bible.
ndzoko 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Your god if he exists is a killer:Witches, kill them. Homosexuals, kill them.fortunetellers, kill them. those who don`t listen to priests, kill them. those hitting their dad, kill them. those who curse their parents, kill them, adulterers, kill them. fornicators, kill them. people who believe in other religions, kill them. non-believers,kill them. fals prohets ,kill them. blasphemers, kill them. those who work on the Sabbath, kill them. This is the word of god !!
ndzoko 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 Creation in Genesis is so dumb, so infantile, that from the 106 colleges, which form the " Christian Coalition of Colleges " only 5 teach litteral biblical creation. How can you be so dumb as to expect observing macro evolution in a lab, a process that takes millions of years ? Micro evolution has been proven.
ndzoko 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 The Bacterial Flagellum is just one. Peace>>> Did you find that argument in your garbage can ? it has been debunked over and over.
ndzoko 4 months ago
Go get education? Yeah. That's going to make you win against an evolution debate. Education and reason is the church's biggest enemy.
benakitodits 4 months ago
THIS VIDEO SUCKS
mellymel51029 4 months ago
There is some really flawed logic behind this video. Human beings are sentient creatures, fully capable of learning from and manipulating their environment. You don't have to be a scientist to understand evolution. All you need to do is review the peer reviewed, published materials to grasp the theory, and review the many facts that have been found to support the theory. The logic here is that you have to be a writer to know how to read, and that doesn't make sense.
deistforever2001 4 months ago
Were you high when you made this? Just curious.
SunZen 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234... Are you familiar with the mouse trap dribble hailed as evidence against evolution? I don't admit all functions are needed. I don't admit that if you remove, lets say a spring, that it will cease to function. You fail to understand that it is still a mouse trap with just one piece. Maybe it didn't catch mice at first. Maybe over time it adapted by creating a spring and set some bait out. Mice liked the bait so it became a mouse trap.U R a god of the gaps man. Deal with it !
cosmo1pug 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234... Are you familiar with the mouse trap dribble hailed as evidence against evolution? I don't admit all functions are needed. I don't admit that if you remove, lets say a spring, that it will cease to function. You fail to understand that it is still a mouse trap with just one piece. Maybe it didn't catch mice at first. Maybe over time it adapted by creating a spring and set some bait out. Mice liked the bait so it became a mouse trap.U R a god of the gaps man. Deal with it !
cosmo1pug 4 months ago
i never claimed to b a scientest but i have witnesses what science has done for the world both good & bad. I do see through the false stories that the bible which is obviously written by man tells it's followers.Faith is weak & achieves nothing but self gratification. Its impossible to proove something doesn't exsist because it doesn't exsist plain & simple.You go through your life blined by religion & find comfort with others who believe the same crap as you. Maybe 1 day u will c the real light
theELUSIV 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 oh i see so u only believe what science says when it suits you. No surprises there. typical god lovers kings of hypocracy. Do u believe in the tooth fairy as well. GOD is a myth an no more
theELUSIV 4 months ago
how to win a debate with christians hands down. IF adam & Eve were the only 2 people created by god (the rest of us bweing made via fucking) explain me this
1) why so many different races (if white men turned in2 black men that would consitute as evolution.
2)if adam & eve were the only 2 people that means incest would have taken place. (maybe that explains why so many preists molest young boys)
theELUSIV 4 months ago
@theELUSIV I am not sure that you can win a debate with Christians using the Adam and Eve incest argument. The fact that Adam and Eve spawned a world of inbreds with all the associated deformations would explain the very existence of religion itself.
Suthrngothic 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 I'll help you with your thoughts. Bacteria cells have a flagellum. You would argue that neither cell nor flagellum work without each other. This is ignorance. Both work, just not well. Look up the silly mouse trap crap creationalist believe helps their argument. A mouse trap works to catch a mouse with only one piece (you can pick the piece) Over time a mouse might trip and die on it. This doesn't mean its not a mouse trap its just not a very good one. good luck thinking
cosmo1pug 4 months ago
You do not need a university doctorate in order to understand and repeat the scientific facts to everyone else. Its not hard to understand, artyfarty.
logar1313 4 months ago
Point 12-"Avoid riddicule"?really? Was that a bait?
Copsweet 4 months ago
@SeekingTruth1234 I like your comment sir, great point. it's good to see at least someone isn't getting brainwashed into believing a fairytale.
IWantToKnowChrist 4 months ago
There are thousands of people like this on youtube that ask questions about evolution. I`ve seen a comment below that asked how could evolution explain the dance of the bees. And there are millions of similar questions. My answer to all of them is: READ about evolution, study it. Don`t make an opinion about it without knowing what it states. Then these questions will have to disappear, unless you are an idiot.
andreiuta171 4 months ago
the logic error is the existence of a pre-cambrian mammal
coreygu 4 months ago
I believe in Christ...but uh...I must agree with any of the evolutionists with the fact that this argument wasn't that great...work harder (btw, if you followed your steps and thats all you got...err....*pats on back*) keep it up... :)
HadesKleio 4 months ago
Hey, not everyone is a dumb fuck like you. Don't be so hard on yourself.
SgtSecsy94 4 months ago
Why would I take the word of someone who failed to use proper grammer in any of his sentences.
TheUnsungOne 4 months ago
DO you realise that you are refering to science in this video of yours in some of the arguments?
Now if you try to disprove it.. its pretty strange to use it to do so right? :P
TheGoatherdGod 5 months ago
I was disappointed. I thought one of the steps would've been "Hit Evolutionist over the head with brick, then when he doesn't respond to questions, declare yourself the winner of the debate"!!!
xcellken1 5 months ago
Funny, funny stuff.
revengeofwaffle 5 months ago
I don't think many of you know what the video is about. The poster wants creationists to research and learn about science (particularly biology) to prove evolution is false if they can. Thus winning the debate against an evolutionist.
Hflame20 5 months ago
Natural selection seems more natural. Like immune system.
SpecailUnit 5 months ago
Well, I've watched the 3' 17" clip, I see no part 2 and I'm still wondering how to win a debate against an evolutionist. By the way, I'm not a scientist and yet I have a clear enough understanding of gravity to know not to walk off a tall building. I understand light speed, black holes, tidal flow, pollination, DDD and the failure of anulus fibirus tissue. I did not learn this stuff through the bible. The Bible taught, incest, genocide and predjudice. The main character is jealous & spitefull.
Avidcomp 5 months ago
@Avidcomp You know the Bibly is a compilation of books right? There are many main characters and many stories about different things.. Like Chow says. "Damn read a book or something"
GLazz85 5 months ago
1. Stop assuming you have personal relationship with Jesus where you really don't. He's dead for over 2000 years and you never saw him before. <- FACT
2. Stop assuming the people you love and trust something about Christ when they really don't
3. We don't think religious people don't lie. In fact, they lie their asses off. Even to themselves.
4. I agree with latter points you made. But I can also tell the Christians to kill each other so they will go to heaven to prove they're right themselves.
steamknife 5 months ago
First of all evolution is just the theory we have dug up the dinosaurs but not that damn missing link. or the missing link could be link this *snap* and the EVOLUTION.
This video made me LOL.
SpecailUnit 5 months ago
@SpecailUnit evoultuion is a proven law not a theory
GeniusAtheist 5 months ago
@GeniusAtheist Er... it's a theory. You just don't understand what "theory" means. Look it up. On the other hand "creationism" is not a theory, it's not even a valid "hypothesis" (look it up).
As W. Pauli would say, "Not only is it not right, it's not even wrong!"
d3fau1thmph 5 months ago
@d3fau1thmph they call it a theory but in reality it is a law that is bound to all creatures on earth i myself find that this theory is proven enough to point that you can consider it a law
GeniusAtheist 5 months ago
1. Not trying to explain things that I don't understand. I know what I know, things that don't make sense, don't make sense.
2. Refer to part 1. / If you know that they don't know anything about science, then you are saying that you know more about science because you know what they are saying is false.
A Precambrian rabbit is a HYPOTHETICAL fossil. The oldest rabbit fossil found is 53 million years old, not 4600 million years old. Which is the age of the Precambrian era. Finish school kid.
NattensSkugga 5 months ago
so the word atheism comes from the greek language ??? and what is that language Man made?????? ha ha.
PQUINTA6 5 months ago
@PQUINTA6 I dont think you understand english very well, so we cant expect you to understand logic and reason either
theknowbeing 5 months ago
first instruction: deny the posibility of the existency of God.
second. deny any sobrenatural phenomena (like life after death) although there is now this new theory about multiple universes oh yeah now what do you do!
debate against religions even knowing religions are just like Atheism (man made)
You are a Blind follower my friend, you have a prophet (dawkins) the re is no difference from a religious extremist. (your doctrine is a mess of hate and rejection).
PQUINTA6 5 months ago
@PQUINTA6 Interesting. The word Atheism comes from the Greek word "Atheos" which simply means "without god". How on earth can you describe a state of mind as "man made"? That statement makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
Drweavil 5 months ago
what I am asking is at least "one 5.5 number. And there is not. Theay are all 5 or 6. You talk just like a fanatic : whatever you cant justify, "is Silly"
Atheist and religious doctrines are the same. Both have blind followers and political leaders. Both lpotencially can lead to extremism.
PQUINTA6 5 months ago
davelantor 5 months ago
Dont forget to include one must also find some way of refuting ERVs and how they can be used to confirm the current state of evolutionary tree.
btw, i dont think you need a doctorate to be able to publish your finding.
after all its the same process, only thing is that you might want to get it right :P ... and for that you indeed need education.
Good video.
davelantor 5 months ago
Your arrow at the end of the video just pointed to blackness
Beefcakes155 5 months ago
@Beefcakes155 back at 2008 the video descriptions were on the right :P
davelantor 5 months ago
I have a B.A. in Biology... Do I win now?
AgowTisro 5 months ago
STFU, n00b.
Percival917 5 months ago
rabbits? Is that the best you can do?
smof1 5 months ago
how to win a debate against an evolutionist?
Stick your fingers in your ears and say "lalalalalalalala".
You win by default because the smarter one will give up.
But just in case.. after you're done "debating", open the holy book of your choice and strengthen your belief.
realbojay 5 months ago
Comment removed
realbojay 5 months ago
Comment removed
thesecondislander 5 months ago
so i went to school and got smart and all that, and it only strengthened my belief god does not exist, are you happy now?
Evanisawesome54321 6 months ago
The idea to the vid is great, but the video itself is unfortunately atrocious. What's with the typos?
Pastor9764 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
foxnews(.)com/opinion/2011/07/27/does-cross-belong-at-11-memorial-site Vote!
Reaperlastfm 6 months ago
what he is saying that only people that are smart can believe in evolution. i think hes on to something here
TheMCBADGER 6 months ago
this seems liek horse shit.you found a fossil lol?
cptmuska 6 months ago
@cptmuska no, he's saying that the only way to actually beat an evolutionist is to disprove evolution by finding a fossil that doesn't fit the evolutionary model, which no creationist has yet done. But they insist on just debating the point and they always lose because they can't disprove it. He's basically saying "If you're saying evolution is a lie but you can't disprove it then shut the fuck up"
AntiMatterWave 5 months ago
@AntiMatterWave evolution is proven, just because you throw an unknow into the picture dosent make a lick of difference, it could be of random origin, no body knows, we have 2 draw on the conclusions we already. And what this video talks about have never happened
cptmuska 5 months ago
@cptmuska that's the point. The video is saying that no-one's ever actually won a debate against an evolutionist because they can't disprove it. And just in case you misunderstood, I myself am an evolutionist. Your statement that throwing an unknown into the picture makes no difference isn't exactly true, it doesnn't prove that evolution is fake, you're right about that, but it does prove that our current idea of evolution is wrong. But like has been said it's never happenned
AntiMatterWave 5 months ago
@AntiMatterWave like has been said it's never happenned ?? so Evolution explanation is "methaforical" too??. Why dont you try to understand the real concept of God before debate egainst it?
Thre is not correlation in the fosils found. No fosils from the precambrian mammal to the rabit found in diferent stages that show the gradual proccess of transformation. Evolution has missing links.
PQUINTA6 5 months ago
@PQUINTA6 I'm not debating against god. Who mentioned god? don't try to put words in my mouth. When I said "like has been said it's never happenned" I meant that no contradictory fossils have been found. Why did you quote me as saying evolution is metaphorical? These so-called missing links are just a lack of spontaneous, massive changes in a slow, gradual process, that in itself explains their absence
AntiMatterWave 5 months ago
@PQUINTA6 Ok this needs corrections.
Its fossil record that has missing links. lol, If only you knew how rare the conditions are to preserve a corpse for millions of years, or in fact knew how many already been found. What you are doing is like asking for a number between 5 and 6 and then after hearing 5.5, you ask for number between 5 and 5.5 and so on.. its silly.
In 20th century after the discovery of DNA, it became the strongest supporting case for evolution, fossils are eye candy. got it ?
davelantor 5 months ago
@cptmuska AGREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED
Percival917 5 months ago
Comment removed
orca464 6 months ago
Comment removed
MrSilverside2002 6 months ago
looks like xinlo is loser #579
hawkertruffelsnout 6 months ago
578 losers who can't stand it when their fairy tales are wrong disliked this video.
PlasteredDragon 6 months ago
@PlasteredDragon they cant stand that, they cant be disingenuous and get away with it. :)
i say to all those creationists.
Prove it BITHEEESS !!!
davelantor 5 months ago
I LOL'd at this.
666Nanoko 6 months ago
Would be an interesting exercise to keep track of creationists and how far they've went up this ladder.
avdmeers 6 months ago
Comment removed
avdmeers 6 months ago
THIS VIDEO IS SOOOO STUPID!!!
6Krys9 6 months ago
@6Krys9 why is that ? ... is it because it looks like too much work for truth ? and you rather be a disingenuous prick and claim evolution is false ?
What this video is pointing out is that. If you have evidence to falsify evolution, just present it and if you are correct, apart from destroying the current model of evolution, you will also win a freaking Nobel price for such ground breaking discovery.
davelantor 5 months ago
You clearly don't comprehend what science is. Why should we redo all research and republish it for peer review if it has already been done? That defeats the purpose of checking the facts and having your peers review it. We would never get anywhere in this world if everyone had to retest every proven principle. I guess you have no comprehension of gravity since you are not Isaac Newton. Jump off a bridge and see if the laws apply to you. Ignorance is easily overcome but stupidity lasts forever!!!
DieterGribnitz 6 months ago
@DieterGribnitz Isaac Newton was a creationist
SonofJaphet 6 months ago
@SonofJaphet
Irrelevant. He's just saying, we can't keep retesting science to be "absolutely sure." Isaac Newton was also an alchemist, but we don't use that against him. It's the strength of ideas, not the strength of the person behind them. Argument from authority.
xinlo 6 months ago
@SonofJaphet Completely beside the point but since you bring it up here is a reply. Isaac Newton was a brilliant man but he lived before Darwin and therefor did not know any better. Here is a link to illustrate how Newton wasted his talents because of the god hypothesis.
youtube.com/watch?v=CMXHKixqOM8
Imagine what else he could have accomplished if it was not for his supernatural beliefs.
DieterGribnitz 5 months ago
@DieterGribnitz The Fathers of modern science where creationists in fact today there are many of them but they keep it for themselves because they will face discrimination just like the 250 scientists who got their diploma refused because of their belief and they where among the best.Darwinism is a plague among the scientific community.You are in fact a religious person Dieter who believe in an ancient pagan folk tale disguised as science
SonofJaphet 5 months ago
@SonofJaphet You know, it sounds awfully like you are repeating the same things like a parrot.
I would bet that you dont even know what evolution is.
or
How science work.
Please. Surprise me and correctly describe how any one of these two issues.
or be a good little creationist and repeat your self like a parrot while you tightly close your ears.
davelantor 5 months ago
@davelantor I know how evolution works but its only based on assumptions ,natural selection on the other hand is true and observable but a cat doesnt produce a non cat .As for going into insults i dont go there its too easy and it proves to me that those who use insults or foul language are not scientists but idolaters who worship man (Dawkinites)..Question how can evolution explain the way bees uses a dance to communicate between themselves?
SonofJaphet 5 months ago
@SonofJaphet " I know how evolution" .. i can easily debunk your statement.
"a cat doesnt produce a non cat", this statement clearly shows that your knowledge of evolutionary process is that of a typical creationist. gradual change over time means slight changes over time resulting in slow change of the group. For simple example, ring species, 2 SEPARATED groups of same animals over time accumulating slight changes over generations, and changes eventually leading to incompatible cross breeding.
davelantor 5 months ago
@SonofJaphet (continuation of previous comment) This leads to speciation,.. 2 groups of animals that cant interbreed will gradually accumulate differences that set them apart from the other group.
There is no claim that "a cat" produced "a non cat" ...Since you dont understand how evolution works you end up making silly statements like " a cat doesnt produce a non cat", which is correct, but irrelevant and holds no weight to your argument since evolutionary progress doesnt claim contrary.
davelantor 5 months ago
@SonofJaphet (continuation of previous comment 2) As for your question "how can evolution explain the way bees uses a dance to communicate between themselves". Since i am no evolutionary biologist or studied bee learning and communication, i will totally make guess work backed up by what little i read from text books. But i accept your challenge ;).
I will write you a PM about it, and if you are not satisfied or have questions or want to continue to argue about it, chose PM or Comments.
davelantor 5 months ago
@SonofJaphet how can you say that you know how evolution works and still ask the question about the bees? evolution is based on assumptions are you serious? not even when Darwin lived evolution was not based on assumptions let alone now. you are talking about insults.. when a man argues with me saying that the earth is flat, how should i call him? you, doubting evolution is like doubting that the earth is round. if you have proof beyond reasonable doubt why don`t you believe? you haven`t read it
andreiuta171 4 months ago
@andreiuta171 Dont make me laugh man NO creationists ever believed in Flat Earth ,its the evolutionists who invented this myth so that they can disredit the REAL scientists BTW in the Bible the Earth is ROUNDnot flat so shut the fuck up with it .There is no scientific breakthrough that came from evolutionists yet and evolutionists are afraid of us because we know the truth and the truth is that you re like ancient pagans who believe in a myth called evolution...Darwin did nt have a diploma
SonofJaphet 4 months ago
@SonofJaphet should i quote you? quote nr 1: "those who use insults or foul language are not scientists but idolaters who worship man" quote nr. 2: "in the Bible the Earth is ROUNDnot flat so shut the fuck up with it". you believe in god and you use those words?? nice. that`s what i thought of christians anyway. Evolution is proven beyond reasonable doubt. do you know what that means? no scientist is afraid of you. maybe they pity you but that`s all.
andreiuta171 4 months ago
@SonofJaphet and the example with flat earth was just an example. i did not say that christians believed or not in a flat earth. i used it to make you understand something but it seems that you cannot understand anything. that`s why you would not understand evolution even if you read about it. i`m sorry for you. but hey, you can take comfort in the fact that ignorance is bliss, right?
andreiuta171 4 months ago
@DieterGribnitz lol, i laugh at your stupidity.
lets see.
1. Please point out this research
2. Please show where its being published
if you do that 2 simple thing, and show that there are genuine research findings that would indicate evolution is false.
Then also tell me why they havent won the Nobel price yet.
Isaac Newton was born in 1642 ... the first author about model for evolution of life was born in 1809
its like saying caveman though we cant fly, so that must be true, planes are a lie
davelantor 5 months ago
well since that hasn't happened yet....
SizableBreasts 6 months ago
wtf after you get an education you will realize how stupid you had been.If what the clip says is possible is possible why has no one done it?
Also for a video titled "how to win a debate against an evolutionist" there really isn't any debating
mcwolds 6 months ago
@mcwolds
I think that's kind of the point.
FuckForcedRegister 6 months ago
I think after step 5 most people become evolutionists.
Dupeo42 6 months ago
HAHA! I came upon this video on a whim expecting some creationist diatribe and instead got a succinct and precise set of steps that fundie creationists not only will never take, but nearly all would never pass step 1. Nice work! Funny cuz it's true.
resistnzisfutl 6 months ago
dude.. absolutely nailed it... best video i watched...........sick of low IQ pseudoscientists like venomfangx and nephilm discussing science.
vamshiinhell 6 months ago
well this cant be done. Its that simple. If someone finds that fossil I will personally bend down and lick their toes. But it wont happen
gulbirk 6 months ago
everything you see in our solar system was just star dust cloud spiraling around till it clumped together.the atoms in your finger will spin around each other the same way that two black holes will. the center two different galaxies both with black holes turn on a dime,to try and know and understand things from the very small to the very big, endless is for me to know, the rest of the world to catch up someday.NOT
IMINTHEMOMENTRU 6 months ago
How to win an argument against an evolutionist: You can't. You're an idiot. I am sorry that you don't understand science, however, I would suggest going back to school.
Lovelytreehugger 6 months ago
@Lovelytreehugger If you can't discern the satirical intent of someone like this, I'd suggest *you* go back to school.
NegationZero 6 months ago
How are we going to convince anyone that we know anything about science if we can't even spell things right in our Youtube videos?
NegationZero 6 months ago
@NegationZero rite onn!
Thunderfingers999 6 months ago
i'm going to start writing comments while watching this
First thing, i may not be a scientist, but evolution is not hard at all to explain and understand
"go to school and get your education" -ironic, coming from people who think we were created out of thin air. Well, not even that, really.
I don't understand the part about the rabbit... Just because we haven't found all the links from the rabbit, doesn't mean they don't exist...
TheMightyScap 6 months ago
@TheMightyScap evolutionist believe people came out of thin air???
king78802 6 months ago
@king78802 no they don't... are you retarded?
TheMightyScap 6 months ago
@TheMightyScap i was being sarcastic who believe people came out of thin air ??
king78802 6 months ago
@king78802 Sorry your comment confused me.
TheMightyScap 6 months ago
lmao Christians think that the earth is less that 10 thousand years old....
that's fucking hilarious..plus we have actually seen single celled organisms evolving and changing...so eat ur heart out christians!~
MrWAZZAPDUDE 6 months ago
@MrWAZZAPDUDE There are so many bias against huamn evolution.....can you tell me why human being evolved for two millions years after getting out of africa. and still we consider them as same as we..its an insult to human evolution..after all africans are 2 million behind us..no way in any other species developing in diffrent parts of world for millions of years were considered as same species..take example of lion n tiger..its a matter of shame that evolutinist hide thses facts
hi5blast 6 months ago
@hi5blast - "can you tell me why human being evolved for two millions years after getting out of africa." - Evolution is precisely what evolutionary theory predicts. We continue to evolve today at the same glacial pace as ever.
bjjolley 6 months ago
@hi5blast - "two millions years after getting out of africa. and still we consider them as same as we."
No, we don't. Google "timeline of human evolution." All evidence indicates that modern humans didn't appear til about 200,000 years ago. Bipedal apes from the time period you mention are called homo erectus and neandertal and were significantly different from us. Africans and Europeans share common ancestors, just like lions and tigers do. It's really not that hard.
bjjolley 6 months ago
@bjjolley hahahahah...yes thats what i mean to say..human were not developed fully into modern human while crossing africa 2 million years ago...which means human developed seprately in asia europe africa for 2 million years...
and these home eretus etc develepoed in africa same as human in europe/asia...
amazing....scientist cant state these facts..becuase then it will be rascism...
yes common ancesestors 2 million years ago...
same like lions and tigers..
got my point
hi5blast 6 months ago
@hi5blast - Two MAJOR problems with your conclusions.
1) Migration of modern humans did not begin 2M years ago. Homo sapiens began dispersing "only" 100,000 years ago, and adaptations such as size, blood cell shape and pigmentation began to diverge almost immediately. While still similar, isolated populations did not evolve "the same."
2) Even if your conclusion was correct, it says nothing about the truth value of creationism.
You'd earn a Nobel prize if your claim had merit. It doesn't.
bjjolley 6 months ago
@hi5blast then do you think the earth was the same like 1million years ago? there is a type of fish with legs... and scientists have seen cells change while they multiply and adapt to a cold environment. same to a hot one. and tigers and lions are basically the same...they can reproduce together....the bible does say that every aspect of evolution is fail..."in the beginning, god created man"...thats big bullshit
MrWAZZAPDUDE 6 months ago
Pearl Trees Of Life [a vast Biblical resource tool]:
[3w dot] pearltrees [dot com] [forwardslash] awhn
AWHNNOH 7 months ago
It stops being 16 "easy" steps after 10 steps. Good points though.
dotmadhack 7 months ago
havn't even gotten past the title and i know this is going to be good
pathlion31818131 7 months ago
All 16 of your points can be thrown down the pan if you just look at the most recent outbreak of E.Coli in Europe, an entirely new strain; never seen before. Or of course you can look at the common flu, which evolves all the time. For example; every flu pandemic of the 20th century was caused by the appearance of a new strain of the virus in humans. Or you could look at rats; they've become immune to many of our poisons due to EVOLOUTION. Undeniable proof; & you don't need to be a scientist.
MegaLolburger 7 months ago
If man evolve from apes how come there are still apes today?
Well, some of them were given choices...
fiesta181 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fiesta181 It's because they are from a different gene pool.
MegaLolburger 7 months ago
@MegaLolburger its called a new strain of E.Coli for a reason idiot.
that is because its a new strain of E.Coli. not from different gene pools, its just resistant to what we currently use against it.
this is due to mutations that are slowly and gradually changing the structure of the bacteria. We still identify it as E.Coli because its showing the same effects as all known E.Coli strain and has minor changes.
and the strongest survive, and mutation that gives better protection helps survival.
davelantor 5 months ago
@davelantor Have you responded to the wrong comment? Those E.coli are still from the same gene pool as the previous form of E.coli, I never said otherwise and my argument was about Apes and Humans. We evolved from a common ancestor yet we are from a different gene pool than an Ape. If you have a problem with what I said go take it up with any scientist who studies evolution. Think before you type.
MegaLolburger 5 months ago
@MegaLolburger Sry, when looked at it in form of timeline when you said ( It's because they are from a different gene pool.) it looks as if it was referring to different strains of E.coli.
Looked like this when read fast :
' That new E.coli is resistant to drugs used against old E.coli because they are from different gene pools.'
- so my response was to that, :P .. which indeed not something you had said.
My apologies.
ps. i also said "not from different gene pools" ;)
davelantor 5 months ago