I am sick of voting for the lesser of two evils. Every vote cast for a Republican or Democratic candidate is another nail in this country's coffin. They are completely worthless, pampered, spoiled, selfish, lying politicians with a vomit-inducing sense of entitlement.
Read the platforms. Find out what other people are doing. If no candidate is worth your vote, write-in yourself.
I think Americans need to force the issue of Open Debates!
Vinny is right, I would not say it that way, but definitely tell the commission to let the people hear the truth from all the candidates not just the terrible 2!
Discussion this and other hot topics at NoVoteWasted[dot]com
Fact: When Ross Perot ran for President in 1992 he got 20% of the vote. 1 out of 5 people. Ross Perot's participation in the debates had much to do with that! OPEN THE DEBATES! Fuck the Commission on Presidential Debates!!
@vinnykster "Commission on Presidential Debates" = SCAM
The problem with UNOWNED candidates is, it creates work for the CIA to chase them out of the election; chances of stumbling across a patriot that refuses, then you got to KILL them.
You know it just gets too dirty, so they created CPD.
Nader's lawyers filed a notice of appeal on Sept. 15, 2000, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted the motion on Sept. 26, 2000. An expedited hearing occurred before a three-judge panel on Oct. 5, 2000; the court dismissed Nader's appeal on Nov. 1, 2000. On Jan. 31, 2001 Nader filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court; the court declined to take up the case on April 30, 2001.
Lawsuit filed by the Nader 2000 Campaign et al. against the FEC Becker v. FEC - filed June 19, 2000 in the U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts; oral arguments heard Aug. 2000 in Boston by U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris; on Sept. 1, 2000 the court ruled Nader and the plaintiffs had standing but denied their request for a preliminary injunction.
Excellent video. I'm glad that there are other people out there who think the same way I do. Thanks for posting this for all the world to see. It just makes that "maybe" more likely to happen.
Republicans and Democrats have both told me they would have voted for Ron Paul. In fact I have had more people tell me they wanted to vote for Ron Paul then McCaine and Obama so it made me very surprised to not see this reflected in the poles, did anybody else notice this? and the news networks bias as they are, where not giving him air time or being fair to him.
There is no such thing as throwing your vote away when you feel that the Republicans and the Democrats have let down this country and it is started to collapse around us, don't be a fool vote third party before it is to late.
Both major parties are a charade anyway. With a few exceptions, both parties are pretty much the same on the issues. The few differences that they do have is emphasized so much, you'd think it was the ultimate show down. The only real difference are the faces.
It make a greater diff. to vote in local electons by bringing in non-partisian representatives into the gov.
I'm a Libertarian, but I vote Republican. Here's why.
Let's say the Libertarians become a powerful third party. Half of the Conservative vote goes to the Libertarians, and half goes to the Republicans. All while the entire Liberal vote goes to the Democrats.
Who becomes president? The Democrat? The same goes if two Liberal parties run against a single Conservative one.
Once a third party starts actually getting more votes, it will nessecarily soften its views and become more like the major parties. The way I always thought of it was that fiscally libertarians are more republican and on ethical issues they are more like democrats. So, I think that if people actually understood them, they would get both votes and be a viable third choice.
We DO only have one party - Republicrats. These politicians do NOT care about you, me or democracy. They care about their own profit and power. The republican neocons are dumping people off the voting roles as I type. They are setting their machines in heavily democrat districts to not record ANY vote at all (for president vote only). Guess what that will do in the election!? Besides, the bought & paid for mainstream media is pushing John McBush. The wealthy intend to win - one way or another!
this was an excellent try and I agree with ALL you say BUT you need to rehearse your speech so it is more polished, the frequent "ahhh's" and "Ummm's" and long awkward pauses do not help our cause. PLEASE redo this video but practice it before you record it so it seems more professional and will not give those who disagree with us any reason to stop watching before you make your point... please. Blessed Be. :-* (And no swearing, that makes old farts like me also stop watching... thank you)
The will of the people would be best served by electing people with no party ties.People who would not be bound by party platforms,and could do the things WE want them to do.
I think what you're saying is a good step.The third party takes power away from the other two.Voting for a third party,is the first step in a series of actions,that lead to the death to the party system......hopefully.
I am sick of voting for the lesser of two evils. Every vote cast for a Republican or Democratic candidate is another nail in this country's coffin. They are completely worthless, pampered, spoiled, selfish, lying politicians with a vomit-inducing sense of entitlement.
Read the platforms. Find out what other people are doing. If no candidate is worth your vote, write-in yourself.
aldoreshgaramok 1 year ago
I think Americans need to force the issue of Open Debates!
Vinny is right, I would not say it that way, but definitely tell the commission to let the people hear the truth from all the candidates not just the terrible 2!
Discussion this and other hot topics at NoVoteWasted[dot]com
novotewasted 3 years ago
Fact: When Ross Perot ran for President in 1992 he got 20% of the vote. 1 out of 5 people. Ross Perot's participation in the debates had much to do with that! OPEN THE DEBATES! Fuck the Commission on Presidential Debates!!
vinnykster 3 years ago 4
@vinnykster "Commission on Presidential Debates" = SCAM
The problem with UNOWNED candidates is, it creates work for the CIA to chase them out of the election; chances of stumbling across a patriot that refuses, then you got to KILL them.
You know it just gets too dirty, so they created CPD.
UnoRaza 1 year ago
Nader's lawyers filed a notice of appeal on Sept. 15, 2000, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted the motion on Sept. 26, 2000. An expedited hearing occurred before a three-judge panel on Oct. 5, 2000; the court dismissed Nader's appeal on Nov. 1, 2000. On Jan. 31, 2001 Nader filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court; the court declined to take up the case on April 30, 2001.
vinnykster 3 years ago
Lawsuit filed by the Nader 2000 Campaign et al. against the FEC Becker v. FEC - filed June 19, 2000 in the U.S. District Court of the District of Massachusetts; oral arguments heard Aug. 2000 in Boston by U.S. District Court Judge Patti B. Saris; on Sept. 1, 2000 the court ruled Nader and the plaintiffs had standing but denied their request for a preliminary injunction.
vinnykster 3 years ago
FACT: The Commission on Presidential Debates kept Ross Perot out of the 1996 debates.
vinnykster 3 years ago
Excellent video. I'm glad that there are other people out there who think the same way I do. Thanks for posting this for all the world to see. It just makes that "maybe" more likely to happen.
Nebulus703 3 years ago
Republicans and Democrats have both told me they would have voted for Ron Paul. In fact I have had more people tell me they wanted to vote for Ron Paul then McCaine and Obama so it made me very surprised to not see this reflected in the poles, did anybody else notice this? and the news networks bias as they are, where not giving him air time or being fair to him.
harryflocyberman 3 years ago
There is no such thing as throwing your vote away when you feel that the Republicans and the Democrats have let down this country and it is started to collapse around us, don't be a fool vote third party before it is to late.
harryflocyberman 3 years ago 2
Both major parties are a charade anyway. With a few exceptions, both parties are pretty much the same on the issues. The few differences that they do have is emphasized so much, you'd think it was the ultimate show down. The only real difference are the faces.
It make a greater diff. to vote in local electons by bringing in non-partisian representatives into the gov.
diaverde09 3 years ago
even though im australian, i have a fair idea what is happening in america./ i would support ron paul and vote third party. it may make a difference.
Audi2000t 3 years ago 2
I'm a Libertarian, but I vote Republican. Here's why.
Let's say the Libertarians become a powerful third party. Half of the Conservative vote goes to the Libertarians, and half goes to the Republicans. All while the entire Liberal vote goes to the Democrats.
Who becomes president? The Democrat? The same goes if two Liberal parties run against a single Conservative one.
NichtOliver 3 years ago
Once a third party starts actually getting more votes, it will nessecarily soften its views and become more like the major parties. The way I always thought of it was that fiscally libertarians are more republican and on ethical issues they are more like democrats. So, I think that if people actually understood them, they would get both votes and be a viable third choice.
Tedsuzan 3 years ago 2
We DO only have one party - Republicrats. These politicians do NOT care about you, me or democracy. They care about their own profit and power. The republican neocons are dumping people off the voting roles as I type. They are setting their machines in heavily democrat districts to not record ANY vote at all (for president vote only). Guess what that will do in the election!? Besides, the bought & paid for mainstream media is pushing John McBush. The wealthy intend to win - one way or another!
t4705mb6 3 years ago
The Third Partys won in 2004.
65 million votes not counted....
SCOOTERBALLUSA 4 years ago
this was an excellent try and I agree with ALL you say BUT you need to rehearse your speech so it is more polished, the frequent "ahhh's" and "Ummm's" and long awkward pauses do not help our cause. PLEASE redo this video but practice it before you record it so it seems more professional and will not give those who disagree with us any reason to stop watching before you make your point... please. Blessed Be. :-* (And no swearing, that makes old farts like me also stop watching... thank you)
Aphaythea 4 years ago
The will of the people would be best served by electing people with no party ties.People who would not be bound by party platforms,and could do the things WE want them to do.
worldlystone 4 years ago 2
Actually, I agree. I used to be fervently anti-party. But what can you do?
squarecircle 4 years ago
I think what you're saying is a good step.The third party takes power away from the other two.Voting for a third party,is the first step in a series of actions,that lead to the death to the party system......hopefully.
worldlystone 4 years ago 2
w00t first post!
squarecircle 4 years ago