Port Arthur martin bryant liked guns part 1

[AlephAmiga]

wow what a shitty video ! flagged !!!

[1AussieAvenger1]

@AlephAmiga ... i hope you get problems for "false flagging"... but really thats all your here for. to be a nuisance.

[madnessqc]

even with finer points of law bryant would be found guilty by a jury lots of evidence

AUSSIE AVENGER your bullshit assumptions and repetitive drivel knows no bounds

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc and you have nothing at all to base your side of the debate on. it's like i said but you can't handle the truth. how about you ask the toll booth operator who was driving bryants car when it entered PA that day at the toll booth and who argued with him over the price. he said its martin bryant. he's seen him before too. im pretty sure it's Ian Knightly, but i'll go back and have a look in my research.

[madnessqc]

@1AussieAvenger1 somebody said it was him somebody said it was not him choose to believe who you want. you say i cant handle the truth hard evidence please not he said she said school playground stuff. what i want is the truth

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc ok. bryants car. what your version of how it got from his home to a 4 person murder scene near the toll booth? keep in mind he was witnessed many times on the way, and at the toll booth entering PA. all witnesses gave a similar description fitting bryant that day. none said dark hair, fat, short, old, or anything other than the matching description, even the ones who didn't id bryant.

bryant has made admissions but wont talk of it with his mum. he would have to tell her the truth.

[madnessqc]

@1AussieAvenger1 My version? difficult i was not there . this totally stinks from what i read about it. I do not believe he acted alone one angle is to look at some of the people who were there that day

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc .. angles? theories you mean. we have seen that Overbeeke was there and has been named by macgregor as the shooter, along with Dyson, and that neither could have been the shooter at all. one wasn't there, the other was in company at all times... and... neither match the description of the gunman which was very similar from all witnesses. so forget those ridiculous claims and use sense.

the PA case stinks from disinformation spreaders. how can people ingnore real facts for theories?

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc obviously you are prepared to go round in circles on this, never accepting real facts, and accusing others of needing more research. you are absolutely hopeless in your defence of your own knowledge of the case. ive given you real facts and all you can say is i base it on 'oh he pleaded guilty'. you ignore his car, witnesses and descriptions, sole survivor of Seascape, his statement, ownership of the weapons, and futher admissions. you know nothing and belong sipping tea with carleen

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@1AussieAvenger1 he's another multiple new account created 7 march 2011 .

Mate their so obvious sometimes its painful.

Notice he went quiet when you mentioned " you ignore his car, witnesses and descriptions, sole survivor of Seascape, his statement, ownership of the weapons, and futher admissions "

they like to brand anyone who disagrees with their wild conspiracies as just some mindless tv watching drone....meanwhile they copy and past theories from conspiracy sites as their "research"

[1AussieAvenger1]

@ProfessorTiNfOiL it'll end soon when YT gets accounts linked to google accounts so they know exactly who everyone is. no one will be able to comment or hold an account without a legit email from a google account. has yours clocked over yet? mine has. so multi accounters... your time is nearly up.

i think ive just about had enough. i may contact some legals and see if it can be pressured to release the PA file under F.O.I. in the best interests of the public. to many people named need justice.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc yes facts... there were some who didn't ID bryant but those same people gave a description fitting the gunman, and matching bryant still. none said anything other than a close description of bryant.

the circles?? its not me... im sticking to the same line ever since i decided to expose the conspiracy theorists, which they do well here, and i have admitted or debated all facts in an unbiased manner inlike others.

most PA theorists are anti-govt pro-gun lobby. aint that the truth!

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc AR-15 weighs just over 3kg, in 28yr old hands with an 11yr old brain, and carleen now admits martin has 'aspergers synd.' which i have said all along.

yeah the media doctor pics and a vid too. what will media stop at? in hindsight an inquest should've been held, but same outcome for bryant, just showing incompetent investigation, media breaches, some conflicting time lines, and an embarrased govt. my est. for a commission/inquest is 3-5yrs @ $300-$500+million, 3000+ witnesses

[scottssrx]

So did all of these witnesses lie? and if so why would they? what would they have to lie about?

Sure is interesting though! anyway,have a wonderful night!

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx you're saying witnesses lied not me... im going with the ones who did either witness and i.d. bryant or gave a matching or near acurrate description of bryant that day. i happy with that, and you're not. bryant in jail and its on you to prove what you think is true, and also to validate your statements with evidence not hearsay.

[scottssrx]

Another thing borne out by the witness statements is many of them describe the gunman's build as SKINNY or THIN. And that many described the gunman's hair as being STRAIGHT rather than curley the true fact is was 90 percent straight with a slight curl at the bottom - this can be seen on the video frame

The PROBLEM with all this is Martin Bryant's hair length at that time stopped about an inch ABOVE THE SHOULDERS. And he was was 29 years old and looked it. Martin was Beefy not Skinny

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx ...you've excelled yourself. this is a silly as it gets... so bryant was beefy now... ha ha wow you tell a ridiculous story. even the idiot conspiracy theorists will get a giggle out of this one.

your credibility.... just went out the door.... zip

[madnessqc]

new account just opened by someone who must be nuts. I live in fantasy land need to take my medication. . I need to lie down aca is on. My condition is the reason i feel Bryant was set up as a patsy. Nothing to do with the facts

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc ummm fair enough... dont let me interrupt

[madnessqc]

@1AussieAvenger Reading your posts on various sites whats your condition sounds worse than mine

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc yeah i guess you aint had time for the medication to set in yet. me? i doin fine now that they swapped the blue pill for the green one. i'm having a little trouble reading your grammar so ...i'll...type...a...little...­slower...so...you...can...keep­...up... better now?

[madnessqc]

@1AussieAvenger1 when i wake up and recover from illness i gonna learn gramma and be as clever as you.

one day i may see the light and understand bryants guilty some evidence could certainly speed that process up sadly i get none from you

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc im not clever, but we can apply ourselves a little. i'd like to see govt release the PA file under freedom of information so we all could see exactly how much real evidence there is, and discount any of the theories associated with the case.

i have quite some legal experience on both sides of the fence. reading bryants description of the bmw abduction, although distorted, was enough for me to know what we are dealing with. how would he know of some of his statement? he was there.

[madnessqc]

@1AussieAvenger1 experience on both sides of the fence did you conduct your own defence? If our leaders continue in this way we have to ask questions. 

[1AussieAvenger1]

@madnessqc ... no im in music... i have led a life that tendered on socializing with criminal types as well as honest or legal types. in my industry you see most things. worst i seen was a guy killed with a cricket bat and the perp got off with an 18mth susp sentence with $100k legals. ive read many criminal statements, all lie to a degree. i've had experience with an aspergers sufferer. he shoved a lit cig in my eye as a kid just for fun.

soon the file will be released and we'll all see.

[scottssrx]

I would just like to know how this guy Martin Bryant pulled off a beruit triple shot? only a handful of the worlds best combat shooters can do this!,so how could a guy with an iq of 66 do this?

pretty sus if you ask me,and even top military officials seriously doubt this massacre!

I am not interested in conspiracy therioes,just plain old truth,and why no trial? thats against the law

Blind freddy could see this is bullshit

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@scottssrx top military officials ?

Who are you talking about ? ....one ex australian vietnam veteran officer who because eccentric in his old age ?

What are the names and ranks of the rest of " military officials" ? ...or are you just making up more shit again hoping no-one calls you on it ?

"beurit triple" , makes it sound special forces when you throw around the catch-phrases LOL

No trial because Bryant pled guilty , why keep asking ? thats the law.

[scottssrx]

@ProfessorTiNfOiL Looks like you are getting angry now, settle down old son,the truth will hit you hard when it comes out. till then i can only laugh at you

[scottssrx]

@ProfessorTiNfOiL its pretty obvious i hit a nerve hey pal? beruit triple,thats the shot that was taken that day at Port Arthur.

It is a shot used by special forces correct,so how could Bryant take a shot like that? i have been shooting since i was a small child in all sorts of comps,and have also shot running bore (moving targets) i know how hard fast moving targets are to hit.

You are entitled to your opinion,even though you are starting to crack and get bitchy

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@scottssrx..... hit a nerve ?

because i asked for evidence of your theories , with facts to back up your statements .

names , times , dates of your theories ....not just what you believe off conspiracy websites then go about copy and pasting it as if it were facts .

so no , not at all :)

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@scottssrx Do you copy and best everything like a gullible blind sheep from conspiracy websites ?

under a few youtube accounts ?

[degeneratgambler]

jfk tonkin waco oklahoma port arthur 911 the official story sucks

[1AussieAvenger1]

@degeneratgambler ... not interested in world theories but yes the official stories in many of these suck.

Port Arthur investigation has it problems but that doesnt mean bryant didnt do it. he did. he was there, witnessed many times inside, outside, and on the way to PA. his car, weapons, captured on scene, admissions. its not tv. one minor complication doesnt throw a case out here in Australia.

you want to see injustice? watch USA prosecute a 2nd time, a man jailed here, for the same crime

[RapsAlive]

Of the few witnesses contacted by police, only two positively identified Bryant as the gunman at Port Arthur, both having first identified him on May 27, after the media had published his photograph naming him as the culprit. In their police statements, three witnesses, two of whom knew Bryant by sight, stated that they did not recognize the gunman as Bryant and a worker in the café later stated she had changed her mind because the gunman did not resemble the photographs published by the media.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@RapsAlive ... you're repeating old theories. what you say is not considered fact but just inventive journallism through the art of disguising the real facts with one or 2 truths. the real truth is bryant was identified many times but couldnt be used as evidence due to claims of media contamination from defense.

we only see some of the picture. one day when all is released you and i will know more and still the same outcome. never was there a second gunman sighted or identified.

[RapsAlive]

After finishing his meal, he walked into the cafe, returned his tray, and started conversations with a number of people at the cafe about wasps and a lack of Japanese tourists.

Police reports state Bryant reached the Seaside house at approximately 2:00pm. This leaves a gap of about 50 minutes. I think it appropriate to subtract 20 minutes for the car line, moving parking spots, sitting in his care, ordering food, and starting random conversations, no? If not, sorry, I was 5-10 minutes off!!!!!!

[RapsAlive]

Could you also give a logical explanation why Bryant used, and knew the Beirut Triangle?

[RapsAlive]

I don't see how Bryant isn't heavily handicapped.

Most of his responses are not coherent, and posses quite an array of grammatical errors. He stumbles on many words, and obviously has difficulty constructing correct sentences.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@gotmyfingerrscrowsed ... Hill took a deal with the crown for amnesty. Hill was a greedy gun dealer who saw the money and took it. he didn't pull the trigger though. agreed he never should have sold guns to bryant without some thought of his actions. yep Terry Hill is fucked. today Hill would be crucified for his actions because laws were changed for the better. pro gun people will never admit that our gun laws are fine as they are now. who needs autos and who needs slack licensing?

[jimk10117]

He didn't do it!!

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@jimk10117 Martin Bryant shot 35 people dead.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@ProfessorTiNfOiL yep bryant murdered 35 innocent people that day including 2 little girls. i believe in God and that there is more to life than meets the eye.... but God... where the fuck were you when this all happened? the harsh reality is that people have a free choice and bryant chose to kill people randomly on a murder spree that should have concluded with his death. i'd happily shoot him but the relatives of the victims would beat me to it.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@jimk10117 ... you got some proof on what you say? just claiming it isn't enough. if bryant didn't do it then who did? and present your case with proper explanation. you do know that bryant has made several admissions over the years. no second gunman was ever sighted. bryant has been identified and also bears a good likeness to descriptions, unlike the idiots who claim a 40's SOG officer did it.

so speak up.. what do you say really happened?

[philthis86]

do you know where i can hear this interview for myself?

[dazzagroves]

HMMMMMM .......funny how ya cant come up with anything that aint on wiki or any other medium!!!! MAGGOT, get a fucking life. AS I SAID IF YA NEVER MET HIM IN RISDON NUT WARD SHUT YA GUTS....

RIGHT HANDED MY ARSE !!!!!!

I'VE SINCE BEEN INFORMED HAHAHA

SURE YA HAVE ..NICE TRY SHERLOCK

[1AussieAvenger1]

hey dazzacumboy... making out your all info? speak up fool and say what you think happened instead of picking fights you cant ever win. and type normal if you can. emphasizing an idiots point of view is your only weapon. i put the nexus thing there as nexus is the idiot who started the left handed gunman theory... or didn't you know that goose? why don't you spend your time finding where the theories come from. you just carry them on. so original eh?

[1AussieAvenger1]

13 years ago today.... have some respect for the 35 innocent victims whose lives were taken by the sole gunman apprehended at seascape cottage. martin bryant.

may the victims truely R.I.P.

[1AussieAvenger1]

seems to be some proof of a 'conspiracy theory' general mistake.....

"Correction: In the previous article in this series (NEXUS vol. 13, no. 4), I stated that Martin Bryant is left-handed. I have since been informed that in fact he is right-handed, and that confusion has arisen over this issue because of a statement he made to police in which he said that he had taught himself to shoot left-handed"

bryant is right handed.

[felixq78]

@1AussieAvenger1 So Nexus got it wrong in one instance, big deal. There are many unanswered questions that need to be addressed but the authorities were in fear of these questions coming up in court. Suspiciously his 2nd solicitor, Mr. John Avery spent weeks in convincing Bryant to plead guilty thereby avoiding a trial.

Avery admitted to having his own agenda. Apart from this, the kill rate achieved by the shooter was one that could only be achieved by a handful of professionals WORLDWIDE.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@felixq78 ... yeah big deal... too bad your conspiracy theory buddies cant accept the truth. some of what you say is true. doesnt mean bryant didnt do it though. he did. at least Nexus admitted it and moved on.

the kill rate? on and on we go with this. it takes focus to do this. a mentality to focus with no remorse. unloaded AR15 is a bit over 6lbs. an 11yr old mind in a 29yr olds body. would you like to say how bryant got there that day?

[RapsAlive]

@1AussieAvenger1 In less than thirty minutes at six separate crime scenes, 35 people were shot dead, another 22 wounded, and two cars stopped with a total of only 64 bullets.

A mentality to focus with no remorse wouldn't do this, and is a weak cop out.

[SPECIALagentKOOKY]

@RapsAlive now bryant only fired 64 rounds ?

man , the nutters really are fudging numbers , to push their marksman theories.

[RapsAlive]

@SPECIALagentKOOKY

Could you point me to a source stating a different amount of bullets, please.

Nutter? Gotta love when the people who feel they are intellectually superior to others place pathetic, lame, childish labels on people, when in reality it only shows the true colour of said person.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@RapsAlive ... 6 different murder scenes, the area all around was a crime scene.

anyway... i'll ask one question of you... what is your reasoning or source for the assumption their was 64 bullets?

its about time your type explained themsleves instead of hiding behind a few radical statements designed to deceive. btw 35 were not shot dead in under 30 mins. R.I.P. to the innocent victims.

[RapsAlive]

@1AussieAvenger1

According to the mainstream story:

Bryant lined up to to enter the Port Arthur Historic Site at approximately 1:10. There was a line to reach the toll booth, and when he paid the ticket, he then selected a parking spot near the Broad Arrow Cafe. Security told him he had to find a new parking spot, as the spots he was in was reserved for camper-vans. Bryant complied, went to a new spot, and sat in his car for a few minutes. He then ordered a meal at the Broad Arrow Cafe.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@RapsAlive .. stories conflict in all timelines. not one. all. most witnesses had no idea what was about to happen prior to PA

shots at seascape 10:30 - Noon. enters PA 12:30pm - 1:10pm

dont forget bryant was identified by the PA park ranger who told him to move his car from the bus area. real time of entering PA is estimated 12:45pm

the only definates are from when the shootings start at PA. all witnesses, and i mean all, described the gunman as close to bryants size with blonde hair.

[ProfessorTiNfOiL]

@1AussieAvenger1 the "64 bullets" is another lie designed to fit in with the

"combat super sniper" theory , often floated around in tinfoil hat gatherings.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@ProfessorTiNfOiL 2 x 30 shot clips for AR-15 and at least 1 for .308. works out 2-8 shots in morning at seascape heard with varying witness statements of time. all diff. now 22-28 shots in clip. 1st shots in cafe, empties clip, reloads, continues. goes outside fires 4-8 shots before going to volvo and getting .308 and firing more. so max 28 / min 22 in first clip and max 26 / min 22 in second clip used in the cafe. thats 54 max and 44 min shots used in the cafe alone. 29 casings found in cafe

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 Its the kill to wound ratio that gave the shooter away. he was exposed as a crack shot by shooting from the hip and hitting the head or neck.

Oh,and did i mention the beruit triple? LOL

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx kill to wound ratio? how many shots? what period of time? know how an AR-15 works? a military spec model has selectable auto, one being 3 shot mode. i would expect someone who wishes to put their credibility on the line would do more research than take notice of repeated lies and theories.

so... casings 29, shots 45-50, time 90sec, @ average of 12ft, most victims motionless.

its fantasy all that 'running shooting from the hip'. weight of that AR-15 under 7lbs

next?

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 I actually have used an AR15 rifle before,at the Bendigo range a very long time ago.

Not all targets were motionless

In less than thirty minutes at six separate crime scenes, 35 people were shot dead, another 22 wounded, and two cars stopped with a total of only 64 bullets. A moving Daihatsu 4WD driven by Linda White was crippled by a “Beirut Triple”, normally reserved for dead-blocking Islamic terrorists driving primed car bombs around the Lebanon.

Amazing shooting?

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 “We are going to see a mass shooting in Tasmania...unless we get national gun control laws.”

Roland Brown, Chairman of the Coalition for Gun Control, uttered on "A Current Affair with Ray Martin", March 1996

At 1.30 p.m. on Sunday 28 April 1996, an unknown professional combat shooter opened fire in the Broad Arrow Cafe at Port Arthur in Tasmania, Australia. Roland brown was right!,and it was tasmania!,it could have been in any state in the Country.

Amazing

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 If you knew anything about firearms,you would know how much easier it is to handle a rifle with a pistol grip stock like the AR15 has,i have a pistol grip stock on my Remington 7615 pump action and it is a heavy gun,but i can swing it easy with one arm because i am strong in the arms anyway.

its fantasy all that 'running shooting from the hip? so you are calling the witnesses liars then? i am sure they would love that.

You make it sound like you were there that day

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx still wont admit how many were motionless and how many running eh? so you also know how light an AR-15 is and how little recoil, pistol grip or not.

roland brown (clown) just repeating barry unsworths earlier statement.

64 shots? who says? 2 x 30 shot clips used in the AR-15 (known proof) and .308 since carpark so at least 8 killed with it.

you brainwash yourself with biased info if you wish. i'll stick with the witnesses who did say it was bryant and they were there, unlike you.

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 Was i there? how would you or me know this? this is just insane.

Keep denying that a guy with an IQ of 66 could pull off this massacre single handed,taking down 2 speeding cars with beruit triple shots,that only a hand full of the worlds best shooters could master with only 3 shots.

Ted Serong was a combat shooter trainer,and he said the shooter was a better shot than him,and there are not many people that can shoot better than me.

Now thats a fact not a conspiracy theroy

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx well i, unlike others, have talked to people who were there, and also have had contact with others who were witnesses. i doesn't matter what you or any of the others say. bryant stays where he is. the witnesses will never go public, and i would never ask them to, just to be scrutinized by idiots who believe anything and go off half cocked.

ted serong made a statement thats all. didnt see it. never read the police report as he had no idea it was 90 seconds or 29 casings etc did he?

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 Yeah? my neighbour 3 doors up from me was shot dead that day,she was 15 years old.

Thats why maybe i am a bit like a dog with a bone about this.

I dont really wish to get in a shit fight with anyone,but many many many things just dont add up about this Massacre.

Anyway,to each their own.

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx i congratulate you on your diplomacy. i always respect people who are fair and honest. sure many things don't add up. if they did there would be no conspiracy theories at all.

i'll say it again. police were lax with their investigation as they thought they had their man cold. 2 months later he said not guilty. media printed his pic making ID vitrually inadmissable in trial, govt handled it poorly.

even with fine points of law bryant would be found guilty by a jury. lots of evidence

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx and while you're so talkative about bryants supposed IQ (rated between 66-78)... explain to us all what aspergers syndrome is, and also how you would get an accurate IQ assesment out of a subject who, due to suffering aspergers, was either unwilling or unable to co-operate to complete the test accurately. you would get similar results from a severe ADHD sufferer. doesnt mean their dumb. so talk... tell us all how you do the IQ test

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 you brainwash yourself with biased info if you wish. i'll stick with the witnesses who did say it was bryant and they were there, unlike you.

Funny,but:

witness statements a picture emerges that brings out 2 particular discrepancies between the gunman and Martin Bryant - the LENGTH of the blonde hair and his AGE. A great number of the witnesses said the blonde hair extended below the shoulders as did a great number say the gunman was in the 18 to 23 age range.

?????????

[scottssrx]

@1AussieAvenger1 Another witness who saw the gunman shooting from the entrance of Seascape described him as "18-22 years old only a young lad". She also noted the hair flowing in the breeze. re: witness terminology: curley hair like Bryant had doesn't "flow" but straight hair does.

What is also noted there by Maloney is this hair was "almost gold in colour

The problem with this is Martin Bryant's hair colour was not gold but more bleached white as was seen in the papers the next day

[1AussieAvenger1]

@scottssrx .. well if you seen pictures of bryant at his trial you would know in fact it is 'golden' and he never had a hair cut in the 6 months before then or his hair would be much shorter to remove the 'so called' bleached white hair you refer to.

18-22yr old... you do know that bryant was refered to as baby faced, and the witness you state was some distance away and not only in shock but most likely cowering from sight of the gunman.

[dankrug]

you dont mention that was of his guns was previously surrended to victoria police for destruction but somehow turned up in tasmania

[1AussieAvenger1]

yes i dont say the AR-15 was part of a surrendered gun amnesty buy back. would that make a diff to martin owning it? or change martin using it at PA? nope.

i would love to post ALL INFO here.. but it would be so long no one could watch it all. this posting is about how martin is proven to have had guns and experience with them before PA. google or check my pt3 to get more links.

the statement here is 'martin liked guns'.

[kaleselak77]

Have you noticed what is happening with ammunition sales in the USA or should I say North American Union, its hit rock bottom....they just got to us early and used this event (which they pinned on Martin Bryant) to make the public have a massive general amnesty on fire arms...

[1AussieAvenger1]

as i have always stated... most complain because of gun control and not the 35 victims or martin or PA. if there was no gun control after PA you wouldnt even see most of these 'martin's innocent' posters.

i pay taxes so an elected gov can do what i cant be bothered worrying about. think about it, just how complex it is from local to federal. how many dept. deciding what?

i also pay tax for police and defence which im happy with. i'm not happy with medical and dental.

[kaleselak77]

They are your vids you have the right to take my comments down but perhaps let them (they, the victims we all care about) make there own assumptions in a fair mind set where they can make their own decisions and form their own opinions. It is ok to agree to disagree my friend.

[1AussieAvenger1]

never do i take down comments on any of my videos unless absolutely necessary through needless swearing or obsenities. all other comments are welcome. so far none has been removed on this page.

i reserve the right to remove any comments on my personal channel.

the surviving victims and witnesses all had their say over 12 years ago. vialls is deceased. macgregor is not producing any further evidence to his theories. its pretty much over but for the internet.

[kaleselak77]

Another shit video that makes no sense...

[1AussieAvenger1]

maybe it doesnt make sense to you because you're the one who has been brainwashed. its about martin and his guns. does that make any sense? some people like to think they are of a higher authority and have some amazing insight into all things.

you kaleselak are not one of these. just an agitator.

you dont want to know anything but your own biased opinion.

[kaleselak77]

^^ It makes perfect sense....I am no agitator, I am nor more or less than you, just a human with an opinion, just as you reserve your right to free speech,. i reserve mine...IMO...this video is shit...

thank you

[1AussieAvenger1]

as videos go... yes this is pretty average. sure you're welcome to your own opinion but when an opinion is given i reserve the right to either comment or correct it.

this video tells the truth about martin and his gun ownership. i do also say that im not happy with the investigation or the treatment of martin without legal representation.

as you have labelled me as some expert i will say that no one is an expert in this case. all have opinions but i stick to facts not theory.

[hoodlem187]

Because its the truth makes it a shit video Kaleselak77 ???

conspiracy theories are always more exciting then the truth for the wannabe dreamers out there.

[McFattz69]

yay some 1 that's not nuts :D u should add some music or something tho

[1AussieAvenger1]

cheers.. music maybe with the next update. martin bryant, the right man, is behind bars for this crime.. unfortunately the police investigation, and witness accounts, are flawed giving way to conspiracy theory idiots. some sell dvd's on their theories. thats disgusting to make money out of this. most are pro-gun lobby political agitators. my agenda is to put an end to the ridiculous SAS and gov theories and give the victims families peace.