I saw the 51 version when I was 8 LOVED IT, saw the 82 version when I was 19 and was amazed that it made me jump out of my seat not once but twice, and saw the new one, and said, "Oh cool, that's how that happened in the original." While still entertaining, the new one just felt like it was wanting to be a remake, but someone said, "No, make it a prequal" Not as entertaining as the 82, or even the 51 version. But still a good watch.
I have to say the best THE THING is obviously THE THING because THE THINGS in THE THING are so much better then THE THINGS in the other two THE THING movies. : )
I love the 1982 version of The Thing, but I also really enjoyed the prequel movie. I went in bracing myself for a crappy attempt to make money and was very happy that it stayed faithful to the 82 movie. I'm still waiting for a sequel called The Things (you know, like, "Aliens" but with the thing)
@MAKER6450 wow you tried to make it seem like you messed up on typing if you were drunk then how come nothing was messed up on your last comment?dumb ass
@MAKER6450 Didn't you watch his 2011 version review? Jeremy didn't mean to be this "big movie review" guy because he's just a normal guy sharing his opinions. In his 2011 version review he already stated out the reasons. He watched the 1982 version, but he's drunk and he forgot it. I mean dude it's 1982! It takes time for people to remember it. I barely remember it, I think I watched the movie back in the 90s where it's aired on the TV but I forgot the name. It takes time bro...
hmmm... i like the thing 2012 n the thing 1982 i think both are awesome but still the thing 1982 is more scary. so after-all i still choose the thing 1982 version.
Saw your review for both 1982 thing and the lateset.I saw the 1982 and it was epic but i did'nt see the latest one and don't want to.From your review its sounds like the newer one is the same shit as the 1982 one and made an ending to tie into the next.Very unoriginal.
1982 version hands down. The fact that there is no cgi and it's all make up and puppets kinda made it creepier for me. It had a darker more sinister feel I suppose. The new one had all that cgi and just felt more like a thriller/action movie. So, it wasn't AS creepy. still creepy though.
1982 John Carpenter's version with no doubt. I never saw the 1950 one but i saw the 1982 as a kid and it scared the living crap out of me. Everything is done perfectly right, with the suspense and mystery at its peek and way better than the 2011. The special effects and makeup was AMAZING for its time. I see it now and yes you can tell, but i much prefer it then the crappy CG they had on the new one. The new one was almost a direct copy of John Carpenters.
I like the 1982 and 2011 one's the best.As i saw the 2011 one first i was like i know how that got there or i know what happend here but the 2011 one does'nt have the creepyness of the 1982 one because its more jump out and attack in the 2011 one and in the 1982 one it was more slow and take your time to get them alone.All the same there great movies and would suggest them to anyone
Hey Jeremy have you read the book based of that film which is called Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell Jr. Is a short story but it's good. That's where the film The Thing came from. Check it out!! ^-^
I love all the version of The thing but I like more The Thing From Another World (1951) and John Carpenter's The Thing. Maybe the one from 1951 has its own touch is really good. It has less killing which is quite disapointing but I like it. Less is better.
@sakuratk While the John Carpenter version of The thing is really good too. I like it because is more based from the book which that doesn't have much for the 1951 film. anyway, one of the reasons I like the 1982 of The Thing is that the special effect of the thing is really awesome and how the people got so paranoid to know who's the Thing and who's not. And the best part was that Carpenter recreate the same presentation from the 1951 film which was awesome.
The 1951 film was nothing like the original story, it wasn't the shapeshifter, it was just some killer vegetable vampire carrot being that cloned itself. 1951's movie was a very loose adaptation, 1982's movie remains the quintessential more faithful adaptation of the story and had the right technology.
@Johnlindsey289 Well...back in the 50's they didn't have the means (or the stomach) to produce the monster effects. Plus, there are some stories which as they are word for word, just can't make an effective movie unless you do what Hawks & Carpenter did which was based off the book.
1982 and 2011 I love old style movies props and electric moving arms and tentacles and I love CGI I don't know why people are hating on CGI can one of you inlighten me???
The 1982 movie is fucking amazing. The practical effects are still leaps beyond anything that CGI can accomplish with its fake-ass looking pixels (seriously, fuck CGI, I'm so sick of it), the story was great, the acting was great and the atmosphere was phenomenal. Carpenter's version is so far ahead of the remake and original that they're not even on the same fucking planet.
@dagrimmreepa You know what I'm sick of? Assholes like you whining about how 'bad' CGI is. There's a reason why it's used, dumbass. Get over it. And FYI, both the '82 version AND the new one are both awesome.
@FlyingPaladin617 of course there's a reason why it's used: it's cheaper, takes less effort and less time to make. none of those reasons make it "better," you imbecile.
@dagrimmreepa Did I not already tell you to fuck off? I mean, if you enjoy looking at fake ass animatronics over real looking CGI that's cool. No one's going to judge you for your small mindedness. Well, at least not me.
@FlyingPaladin617 real looking cgi is an oxymoron you idiot. fuck it, enjoy your transformers and other computer generated orgies. idiots make the world go around, after all. Oh and next time you wanna tell someone to stop replying, maybe you shouldn't attack them in the first place, cos I'm gonna troll the shit outta you.
@FlyingPaladin617 Wow... what a scathing comeback. That's pretty much on the level of "You suck..." "No, YOU suck." Just phenomenal cleverness right there *sarcasm*. But what else can I expect from an idiot who prefers computer imagery to the real thing.. it's like sitting a monkey next to a camera and expecting it to know what to do. Clearly I have to lower my expectations of your IQ even lower than I had initially thought.
@dagrimmreepa And here I thought I had seen retardation at its worst. You sir are clearly the biggest moron on the internet and that takes skill.... or lack thereof. Congratulations! You're an idiot. Owned, again ;)
@FlyingPaladin617 Cool. I'll take that as a victory, since you obviously don't have anything more to say. You always know you won an argument when the idiot you're talking to starts re-iterating the same shit and claiming victory, instead of actually making any points. Anyone can call anyone a moron on the internet, that takes NO skill, no wit, no imagination. You're starting to bore me... now say something clever, dammit. Try again, I'll pretend your previous lame-ass response never happened.
@dagrimmreepa LOL WHAT A LOSER! My comments are full of win and yours are full of fail. Is the butthurt loser getting mad because he knows he's wrong? Seems so. Enjoy your sad excuse of a life, faggot. Owned AGAIN! ;)
The Thing 1982 cause i know without a doubt it is the only movie that still disturb's me so much i only have seen it 3 or 4 time's cause other time's i was watching cartoons or something then i grew up and tried to watch it again but i was watching some more cartoons or whatever but then i seen i,t recognized all the actors and wanted to watch it. The effects were like a blob of disturbing visual delight for me, right now its less scary, i wont watch it till im ready to die (of a heart attack)
This movie is THE definitive adaptation of John Campbell's novella Who Goes There where the 1951 version was a poor adaptation of the novella because of being in the cold war era and not having the right technology to make the monster the shapeshifter, it was nothing like the original story. Carpenter's version was truly faithful to the original story.
The '82 versions is my 2nd favorite movie of all time. I personally think that the special effects in it are still some of the best to this day. I don't really like CGI, it looks really fake to me, but practical effects you know it's fake but it still looks more realistic.
They really missed a trick with the new "The Thing" they should have had less CGI of The Thing and more suspense and tension between the Nords. Anyone planning a skiing trip by the way? Yes the resort has flame throwers.
Even though The Thing is good, it's not nearly as good as The Thing, and even though I haven't seen The Thing, The Thing is my fave! The Thing is just amazing, The Thing isn't as good, but still good.
im sorry I like the 1951 " The Thing from another world" the best. But I still love the '82 version. Its just there two VERY different films. The black and white is so creepy and the suspense with the B&W makes it even more creepy. The 1982 relays more on how gorey it is and not as much suspense. Its weird because im 14 so by law of sterotism i supposed to like stuff with gore and tits.well i do like tits.
You really shouldn't trash the original if you haven't seen it - this is coming from a guy who hasn't seen it. Some of the best movies I've seen are Japanese movies from the 50's and 60's though.
No one made a prequel before because WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU NEED ONE? "Hey, let's make a suspense movie that the audience already knows the ending to!" Brilliant. A SEQUEL would have made a lot more sense. I guess the writers of the new THING needed someone else to do the heavy lifting and hand them 90% of their plot.
Thanks Jeremy for doing this review. This is my favorite John Carpenter movie of all time. I've watched this movie over 100 times. I thought They Live was tied into this movie, but it's not. The 1982 movie is the best one to me. The intro music does it all for me hands down. @bobbytf18. Yes i do agree the special affect are more genuine and was done very well for a 1982 movie.
I really liked the special effects and premise of the movie, but I felt no connection with any of the characters, and the little I did feel was in fact for Kurt Russel, but even sometimes, that was a bit distant. I dunno, maybe its cus I was trying to decide who was The Thing the entire time...
aww i was expecting a higher grade i thought it was much better than the newer one but they got the same grade. the old one did everything better than the newer one even some of the effects looked more genuine
Dude! I'm sorry, but FUCK YOU. You shit on the original because it's old and black and white?! What the fuck is wrong with you? Just because it's old doesn't mean it's a bad film. I prefer the 1951 version over all of them. 195-who gives a shit?! Go to hell.
Mmm thats a tough one because the 80s one is awesome. That was how I first discovered the Thing back when I was a kid. Thenew one is badass epicness. I think If I had to chose I would go with the new one.
The movie is still scary and unsettling to me. Even though some of the effects are pretty dated, but even then they are still very chilling for me. I thought the film did a great job building atmosphere.
Dude i love you and all but.... seriously wear some color.... ur looking more and more pale.... sooner or later youll probably look as pale Edward [ but god forbid the personality]
The thing is one of the best sci-fi horrors ever! I still have to see the next recent installment, but yeah. It was brilliant! And I love how they cut out the typical horror music durign when they're all tied up, taking those blood tests. You just hear the screaming. Far creepier than with music.
I saw the 51 version when I was 8 LOVED IT, saw the 82 version when I was 19 and was amazed that it made me jump out of my seat not once but twice, and saw the new one, and said, "Oh cool, that's how that happened in the original." While still entertaining, the new one just felt like it was wanting to be a remake, but someone said, "No, make it a prequal" Not as entertaining as the 82, or even the 51 version. But still a good watch.
detrius82 2 days ago
1:04 and his diabetis
smexiedoritos 3 days ago
The original 1951 version is fantastic, you should make an effort to watch it.
Jfireprime 4 days ago
The 1951 version because you cant beat the fifties.
klovnen86 5 days ago
PRESS 1 FOR BLACK AND WHITE THING JEREMY!
TheDarkNeonHero 6 days ago
I thought both the 1982 version and the prequel were good, but of course the 1982 version is the best
95Godfather 6 days ago
I have to say the best THE THING is obviously THE THING because THE THINGS in THE THING are so much better then THE THINGS in the other two THE THING movies. : )
anime1157 1 week ago 9
My favorite is the game "the Thing" because that was awsome!
JimiMicro101 1 week ago
I love the 1982 version of The Thing, but I also really enjoyed the prequel movie. I went in bracing myself for a crappy attempt to make money and was very happy that it stayed faithful to the 82 movie. I'm still waiting for a sequel called The Things (you know, like, "Aliens" but with the thing)
autobotman 1 week ago 5
original thing is da best
Da2wiseponys 2 weeks ago
I agree that some films can be dated, but still having an "its an old movie" bias is not a good way to go.
TheGreaterGood80 2 weeks ago
I've seent it.Its Great!!!
alvin4100 2 weeks ago
this is the best one!
ZooTycoonZilla 3 weeks ago
i cant believe you watched the new one first.
you're ment to be this big movie review guy but you hadnt seen the Thing?
you talk like a damn speed freak.
just stfu
MAKER6450 3 weeks ago
@MAKER6450 piss off asshole your just being a dick.and if you saw the review of the 2011 one he saw this one first but he was drunk
ttv0 3 weeks ago
@ttv0 oh you kiss ass.
i see all my movies drunk.....i typed that comment ansd this comment while intoxicated.
MAKER6450 3 weeks ago
@MAKER6450 wow you tried to make it seem like you messed up on typing if you were drunk then how come nothing was messed up on your last comment?dumb ass
ttv0 3 weeks ago
@ttv0 tryed to make it seem like i messed up?
i didnt try do anything.
you're just thinking that because you're fukn mentaly ill
MAKER6450 3 weeks ago
@MAKER6450 Didn't you watch his 2011 version review? Jeremy didn't mean to be this "big movie review" guy because he's just a normal guy sharing his opinions. In his 2011 version review he already stated out the reasons. He watched the 1982 version, but he's drunk and he forgot it. I mean dude it's 1982! It takes time for people to remember it. I barely remember it, I think I watched the movie back in the 90s where it's aired on the TV but I forgot the name. It takes time bro...
pariastabendesa 2 weeks ago
@pariastabendesa yes i did watch his 2011 review first.
he said he hadnt seen this one yet.....or he was drunk when he saw it
MAKER6450 2 weeks ago
82 version wayyyyy better
MAKER6450 3 weeks ago
another film which is FUKIN AWESOME for its time is...........(big climax)............Jurassic Park!
TheGamers40 3 weeks ago
the 1982 version.. the antitrust element was much more detailed
alittleolder 4 weeks ago in playlist movie reviews jeremy
i seen only the modern Thing movies.
BRm2008 1 month ago
you Jeremy I'm surprised that you made no star wars japs.
lonewolftheblack 1 month ago
This is the only scary movie I enjoy watching. It's totally awesome.
TehVenezuelan 1 month ago
i stumbled apaun u a min ago and you r awsome
TheKelpie13 1 month ago
hmmm... i like the thing 2012 n the thing 1982 i think both are awesome but still the thing 1982 is more scary. so after-all i still choose the thing 1982 version.
MyLylya1 1 month ago
Saw your review for both 1982 thing and the lateset.I saw the 1982 and it was epic but i did'nt see the latest one and don't want to.From your review its sounds like the newer one is the same shit as the 1982 one and made an ending to tie into the next.Very unoriginal.
iamthedragon100 1 month ago
my favories the thing
godzillafanatic385 1 month ago
I havent seen any of the thing movies. I want to though.
J4CKM4N2266 1 month ago
Im in love with this movie.
trainofaaron 1 month ago
i challenge you to count how many times he says "The Thing"
MeatWagon101 1 month ago
I like the The Thing it had great acting and so did The Thing. But The Thing? Uh-uh.
TF2Gmod 1 month ago in playlist More videos from JeremyJahns
1982 version hands down. The fact that there is no cgi and it's all make up and puppets kinda made it creepier for me. It had a darker more sinister feel I suppose. The new one had all that cgi and just felt more like a thriller/action movie. So, it wasn't AS creepy. still creepy though.
CroGTheCrappyPaladin 1 month ago
The CGI is this movie is pretty darn good.
FlyingPaladin617 2 months ago
@FlyingPaladin617 Correction: the CGI in the 2011 version is pretty good. My mistake.
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
1982 John Carpenter's version with no doubt. I never saw the 1950 one but i saw the 1982 as a kid and it scared the living crap out of me. Everything is done perfectly right, with the suspense and mystery at its peek and way better than the 2011. The special effects and makeup was AMAZING for its time. I see it now and yes you can tell, but i much prefer it then the crappy CG they had on the new one. The new one was almost a direct copy of John Carpenters.
Stunt36 2 months ago
I like the 1982 and 2011 one's the best.As i saw the 2011 one first i was like i know how that got there or i know what happend here but the 2011 one does'nt have the creepyness of the 1982 one because its more jump out and attack in the 2011 one and in the 1982 one it was more slow and take your time to get them alone.All the same there great movies and would suggest them to anyone
2012glitches 2 months ago
Hey Jeremy have you read the book based of that film which is called Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell Jr. Is a short story but it's good. That's where the film The Thing came from. Check it out!! ^-^
I love all the version of The thing but I like more The Thing From Another World (1951) and John Carpenter's The Thing. Maybe the one from 1951 has its own touch is really good. It has less killing which is quite disapointing but I like it. Less is better.
sakuratk 2 months ago
@sakuratk While the John Carpenter version of The thing is really good too. I like it because is more based from the book which that doesn't have much for the 1951 film. anyway, one of the reasons I like the 1982 of The Thing is that the special effect of the thing is really awesome and how the people got so paranoid to know who's the Thing and who's not. And the best part was that Carpenter recreate the same presentation from the 1951 film which was awesome.
sakuratk 2 months ago
@sakuratk
The 1951 film was nothing like the original story, it wasn't the shapeshifter, it was just some killer vegetable vampire carrot being that cloned itself. 1951's movie was a very loose adaptation, 1982's movie remains the quintessential more faithful adaptation of the story and had the right technology.
Johnlindsey289 1 month ago
@Johnlindsey289 Well...back in the 50's they didn't have the means (or the stomach) to produce the monster effects. Plus, there are some stories which as they are word for word, just can't make an effective movie unless you do what Hawks & Carpenter did which was based off the book.
Yujifanik 1 month ago in playlist Favorite videos
1982 and 2011 I love old style movies props and electric moving arms and tentacles and I love CGI I don't know why people are hating on CGI can one of you inlighten me???
Obsidius101 2 months ago
Speaking of michael jai white... review Black Dynamite.
buddythecow 2 months ago in playlist Jeremy's Movie Reviews
nothing beets the 1982 version
gram1915 2 months ago
Hahaha I'm watching this on Christmas!!!
CaptainWows 2 months ago
The Thing (1982) was the second film I bought on Blu-ray, behind Taxi Driver.
InjectionLethal 2 months ago in playlist More videos from JeremyJahns
The 1982 movie is fucking amazing. The practical effects are still leaps beyond anything that CGI can accomplish with its fake-ass looking pixels (seriously, fuck CGI, I'm so sick of it), the story was great, the acting was great and the atmosphere was phenomenal. Carpenter's version is so far ahead of the remake and original that they're not even on the same fucking planet.
dagrimmreepa 2 months ago
@dagrimmreepa You know what I'm sick of? Assholes like you whining about how 'bad' CGI is. There's a reason why it's used, dumbass. Get over it. And FYI, both the '82 version AND the new one are both awesome.
FlyingPaladin617 2 months ago
@FlyingPaladin617 THANK YOU!!
adambomb528 1 month ago
@adambomb528 YOU'RE WELCOME!!
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
@FlyingPaladin617 of course there's a reason why it's used: it's cheaper, takes less effort and less time to make. none of those reasons make it "better," you imbecile.
dagrimmreepa 1 month ago
@dagrimmreepa No. The reason is because it looks better. So nice to meet you. Try not to get owned next time. Goodbye.
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
@FlyingPaladin617 lolwut? Fake shit looks better than the real thing? Are you high? Seriously though, what are you - 12?
dagrimmreepa 1 month ago
@dagrimmreepa Did I not already tell you to fuck off? I mean, if you enjoy looking at fake ass animatronics over real looking CGI that's cool. No one's going to judge you for your small mindedness. Well, at least not me.
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
@FlyingPaladin617 real looking cgi is an oxymoron you idiot. fuck it, enjoy your transformers and other computer generated orgies. idiots make the world go around, after all. Oh and next time you wanna tell someone to stop replying, maybe you shouldn't attack them in the first place, cos I'm gonna troll the shit outta you.
dagrimmreepa 1 month ago
@dagrimmreepa Idiots do indeed make the world go round as you are a prime example of idiocy and fail ;) Get owned.
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
@FlyingPaladin617 Wow... what a scathing comeback. That's pretty much on the level of "You suck..." "No, YOU suck." Just phenomenal cleverness right there *sarcasm*. But what else can I expect from an idiot who prefers computer imagery to the real thing.. it's like sitting a monkey next to a camera and expecting it to know what to do. Clearly I have to lower my expectations of your IQ even lower than I had initially thought.
dagrimmreepa 1 month ago
@dagrimmreepa And here I thought I had seen retardation at its worst. You sir are clearly the biggest moron on the internet and that takes skill.... or lack thereof. Congratulations! You're an idiot. Owned, again ;)
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
@FlyingPaladin617 Cool. I'll take that as a victory, since you obviously don't have anything more to say. You always know you won an argument when the idiot you're talking to starts re-iterating the same shit and claiming victory, instead of actually making any points. Anyone can call anyone a moron on the internet, that takes NO skill, no wit, no imagination. You're starting to bore me... now say something clever, dammit. Try again, I'll pretend your previous lame-ass response never happened.
dagrimmreepa 1 month ago
@dagrimmreepa LOL WHAT A LOSER! My comments are full of win and yours are full of fail. Is the butthurt loser getting mad because he knows he's wrong? Seems so. Enjoy your sad excuse of a life, faggot. Owned AGAIN! ;)
FlyingPaladin617 1 month ago
the effects in the 1982 movie looked extremely real,even compared to now,and much more frightning.
dignerds 2 months ago
The Thing 1982 cause i know without a doubt it is the only movie that still disturb's me so much i only have seen it 3 or 4 time's cause other time's i was watching cartoons or something then i grew up and tried to watch it again but i was watching some more cartoons or whatever but then i seen i,t recognized all the actors and wanted to watch it. The effects were like a blob of disturbing visual delight for me, right now its less scary, i wont watch it till im ready to die (of a heart attack)
Insane3OB 2 months ago
the 1982 version of the thing is badass, so i'm sticking with the movie that makes me scared. lol
Raven5751 2 months ago
This movie is THE definitive adaptation of John Campbell's novella Who Goes There where the 1951 version was a poor adaptation of the novella because of being in the cold war era and not having the right technology to make the monster the shapeshifter, it was nothing like the original story. Carpenter's version was truly faithful to the original story.
Johnlindsey289 2 months ago
i love the 2011 version.
Matthijs RULEZ!!!
LatinMusicHD 2 months ago in playlist Jeremy's Movie Reviews
This is my like 2nd or 3r favorite movie of all time, just surpassed by The Godfather and Scarface...
doneystoney 2 months ago
82 for sure.
ZeroAnnihilated 2 months ago
The '82 versions is my 2nd favorite movie of all time. I personally think that the special effects in it are still some of the best to this day. I don't really like CGI, it looks really fake to me, but practical effects you know it's fake but it still looks more realistic.
LedSatriani 2 months ago
1982!!
krangturboslank 2 months ago
1982 Version is the best, I love my 80's movies.
MrAWarGuy 3 months ago
ANGRY BLACK GUY! Fucking great!!! Lol
L0S0YungDr0 3 months ago
I love when the thing ripped dat dudes arms off n it made me jump out of my pants
GenghisRules 3 months ago
They really missed a trick with the new "The Thing" they should have had less CGI of The Thing and more suspense and tension between the Nords. Anyone planning a skiing trip by the way? Yes the resort has flame throwers.
B19Dav3 3 months ago
It's funny at the end when he says that u could see more he was pointing down to himself:)
Master21768 3 months ago
dude review the game the best horror game ever!!
shadow21814 3 months ago
I wonder if Jeremy knows of the 1953 film.
Battle5tarRJC 3 months ago
I love the actual original 50s version but that was a funny mockery u did of it.
TheThingKing 3 months ago
You should review the 1951 version now. It is pretty good.
erik15792 3 months ago
everytime i think of keith david i think of "AIM DOWN YOUR SIGHTS"
THOSeRANDOmNJTEENS 3 months ago
Not so much scary, just unbearably tense. The paranoia makes the movie. A genuine classic.
klesker 3 months ago
LMAO i though the same thing from 0:17-0:22
loudrockacdc 3 months ago
Is it weird that that this horror movie has 666 likes?
srinivas1015 3 months ago
"There was on that came out in 1950...who gives a shit" LMAO XD
LUKESTFD 3 months ago
"I don't know what it is, but it's weird and pissed off!"- Kurt Russell
connberkshire 3 months ago
1:25
makemoneyspendmoney 3 months ago in playlist More videos from JeremyJahns 9
Even though The Thing is good, it's not nearly as good as The Thing, and even though I haven't seen The Thing, The Thing is my fave! The Thing is just amazing, The Thing isn't as good, but still good.
nilsen93 4 months ago 21
i liked the transformastions
kinda like resident evil 4
markust1994 4 months ago
The prequel was a dumb idea, because seeing the aftermath at the Norwegian camp without actually knowing what happened helped add to the suspense.
facecycle 4 months ago
im sorry I like the 1951 " The Thing from another world" the best. But I still love the '82 version. Its just there two VERY different films. The black and white is so creepy and the suspense with the B&W makes it even more creepy. The 1982 relays more on how gorey it is and not as much suspense. Its weird because im 14 so by law of sterotism i supposed to like stuff with gore and tits.well i do like tits.
Cupcakejack 4 months ago
i was so fucking confused throughout the hole fucking review
bergerINK 4 months ago
You make funny, I make laughy.
FireYourDoctor 4 months ago
the new thing is crap but good at the same time but the 1982 is awsome and i was only 10 when i saw it, awsome man just awsome
123456789manatee 4 months ago in playlist More videos from JeremyJahns
You really shouldn't trash the original if you haven't seen it - this is coming from a guy who hasn't seen it. Some of the best movies I've seen are Japanese movies from the 50's and 60's though.
futurestoryteller 4 months ago
have you noticed each one came out 30 years after o.o
AcornInc 4 months ago
When he asked us if we wanted to see more, i hope he meant more of that chick
AtomicTank1000 4 months ago
Why would someone put a gun to your head, then offer you a movie?
AtomicTank1000 4 months ago
Thumbs up if u like The Thing better than The Thing or The Thing
AtomicTank1000 4 months ago 51
I love your videos Jeremy, sorry about all the hae on the mayweather ortiz video
guitarkees17 4 months ago
No one made a prequel before because WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU NEED ONE? "Hey, let's make a suspense movie that the audience already knows the ending to!" Brilliant. A SEQUEL would have made a lot more sense. I guess the writers of the new THING needed someone else to do the heavy lifting and hand them 90% of their plot.
GoblinXXX 4 months ago
@GoblinXXX or everyone was curious about what the norwegian team went through and answered questions
albinomonkey27 4 months ago
@albinomonkey27 Not "everyone". For most of us, it was pretty apparent what they went through.
GoblinXXX 4 months ago
@GoblinXXX i was and i mean exact details im weird like that
albinomonkey27 4 months ago
Review both of the dawn of the dead movies!!!!!!!!!!
BAP523 4 months ago
Dude, its almost scary how much we think a like. It's like I'm thinking it an you actually say it...another good review from the double J-man.
Bheezy999 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is a great movie
kevbottron 4 months ago
review back to the future...
InTheMoonFilms 4 months ago
Review the original dawn of the dead (1978)
dantestriptohell 4 months ago
wait....... i think he was talking about me when he talked about the 1952 version..... LOLOLOL :D
ChevailerHere 4 months ago
review STARSHIP TROOPERS
BEST MOVIE EVER
TheTdawg117 4 months ago
You should review the trailer to Chronicle.
DNArington 4 months ago
i like the thing 1982
TheKaijuKing9000 4 months ago
It wasn't scary when the guy does CPR on the Thing?
SatanicDoomElf 4 months ago
So you did get my link?
SatanicDoomElf 4 months ago
Why is thor being brought up in the comments?
calvisions 4 months ago
I will see the 1950s one soon.
But I wonder which video I should attach it to. This review or the review of the new one?
Bleh, they aren't the same movie either way, so I won't attach it at all.
BlazeTheMovieFan 4 months ago
i dont know why but every time i see Keith David in a movie i always think " oh shit theres Winston from ghostbusters" i dont no why i just do
MrJoeybeans81 4 months ago 42
@MrJoeybeans81 I either think Spawn or one of the Gargoyles
batmankixass 4 months ago
1982 baby allll day
CynicallyIntelligent 4 months ago
I had never heard of the 1951 "The Thing" before this but after finding a copy at my local library I think I have a new favorite.
Yodaman0 4 months ago
I love The Thing. 1982 Thing. Haven't seen 2011 Thing. 82 Thing is my thing.
MrHorrorfan23 4 months ago
hey, have you seen the trailer for "chronicle" ?
what's your opinion?
i think this might be the first found footage movie i might actually enjoy!
nikostz52 4 months ago
Hey Jeremy, you know there's actually no need for Netflix. There's a thing called PirateBay and Bittorrent.
CampingestBoyAlive 4 months ago
the black actor dude has a fake black hand midway through the movie.
tuicharles 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1:23 DERP FACE
Asher312 4 months ago
1:25 DERP FACE
Asher312 4 months ago
I'm embarrassed to say I have not watched the 80's "The Thing". Should I watch the 2011 "The Thing" before I watch the 1982 "The Thing".
Or should I watch the 60's version of "The Thing" then the 2011 "The Thing" and then the 80's "The Thing"..... Say what?
ouboet 4 months ago
fucking great movie
assWompingMadNess 4 months ago
the one that i didnt see is my favorite wait that is them all
joelx1000 4 months ago
Thanks Jeremy for doing this review. This is my favorite John Carpenter movie of all time. I've watched this movie over 100 times. I thought They Live was tied into this movie, but it's not. The 1982 movie is the best one to me. The intro music does it all for me hands down. @bobbytf18. Yes i do agree the special affect are more genuine and was done very well for a 1982 movie.
yemiyam 4 months ago
Comment removed
yemiyam 4 months ago
You should try the game. It's pretty awesome as well!!! I have yet to see the new movie, but I love the 1982 version!!! It's awesome!!!
JaneOmo123 4 months ago
watch the ditto (fake trailer) from Smosh. It's a parody of the Thing
malrinko 4 months ago
Not even the thing can face off against Wilford Brimley's Diabeetus....
DasMakNT 4 months ago
Cerina Vincent....Power Rangers...flashbacks :)
NatDuv121 4 months ago
1992 Version, hands down.
The new version effects were awesome, but it lacked the originality of the old one.
Oh, and Commodore 64 still Kicks ACE!
CHRodz 4 months ago
I really liked the special effects and premise of the movie, but I felt no connection with any of the characters, and the little I did feel was in fact for Kurt Russel, but even sometimes, that was a bit distant. I dunno, maybe its cus I was trying to decide who was The Thing the entire time...
I should go kill myself
DenitheGreat 4 months ago
Actually the entire Thing franchise was based off of a story called "Who Goes There?" by John Campbell.
SkyBennett1 4 months ago
My Favorite one of the three is: The Thing
alberto0986 4 months ago 106
Comment removed
AcornInc 4 months ago
aww i was expecting a higher grade i thought it was much better than the newer one but they got the same grade. the old one did everything better than the newer one even some of the effects looked more genuine
bobbytf18 4 months ago
I wonder what happened to the female lead from the new (prequel) Thing.
tubernery 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
never want to hear you say shit like THIS MOVIE LOOKS DATED again
spacexploder 4 months ago
The full title of the 1951 original is "The Thing From Another World", for anyone who's wondering.
THGHOST2010 4 months ago
Anything produced by Howard Hawks IS the best.... I mean JAMES ARNESS IS The Thing. It doesn't get better than that...
inkenyo 4 months ago
In my opinion it deserves a higher rating, but that's just my opinion ;)
TheDecretus 4 months ago
Until the end of the video I thought he was talking about "It"
MrBrooksGrant 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The 1982 one is one of the best movies ever created.
mrebyers 4 months ago
I just saw that today, a little cheese doesn't hold up. But at least the whole movie was not in 3d and the whole movie is in CGI.
OORah4life 4 months ago
Thor was kidna good it was really good but Thing is just something else
skuterixas91 4 months ago
Please Review "A Clockwork orange"
obnoxiousways 4 months ago
Dude! I'm sorry, but FUCK YOU. You shit on the original because it's old and black and white?! What the fuck is wrong with you? Just because it's old doesn't mean it's a bad film. I prefer the 1951 version over all of them. 195-who gives a shit?! Go to hell.
QuatermassMan 4 months ago
@QuatermassMan Dude! I'm sorry, but you are overreacting so much, it's not even funny
Explod1ngNinja 4 months ago
@Explod1ngNinja It wasn't supposed to be funny.
QuatermassMan 4 months ago
@QuatermassMan ...He never said it was a bad film, do not jump to conclusions.
524mills 4 months ago
Now review the 1951 version. THE original.
QuatermassMan 4 months ago
I really like the newer "The Thing 2011" the lead actress is also one of my faves and I really like her in the films she does.
BlondeSteve92 4 months ago
@BlondeSteve92 RAMONA FLOWERS
Explod1ngNinja 4 months ago
'82 baby!
HBK7 4 months ago
awww, I expected the BOWA at the beginning :c
Lionalliance 4 months ago in playlist More videos from JeremyJahns
You gained more awesometacular points because you know who Michael Jai White is. You seen many of his movies?
DeanSearle 4 months ago
1951
caxzrockz 4 months ago
I'm watching this video from the year 2054 and there is a new film coming out! It's called ''The Thing''!
lbplayerify08 4 months ago
Mmm thats a tough one because the 80s one is awesome. That was how I first discovered the Thing back when I was a kid. Thenew one is badass epicness. I think If I had to chose I would go with the new one.
sauceonya 4 months ago
The one in my pants.
shooterb0y23 4 months ago
Review Texas Chainsaw Massacre?
akumatekkusu666 4 months ago
The movie is still scary and unsettling to me. Even though some of the effects are pretty dated, but even then they are still very chilling for me. I thought the film did a great job building atmosphere.
SLPIFan 4 months ago
Dude i love you and all but.... seriously wear some color.... ur looking more and more pale.... sooner or later youll probably look as pale Edward [ but god forbid the personality]
artvsreality 4 months ago
I want to see more Jeremy reenacting black-and-white movies!
MariaVosa 4 months ago
I wish they still made movies like that..... CG is not always the best option for horror movies.
ChimairaGod 4 months ago
This is one of my favorite movies
thechaserv97 4 months ago
The thing is one of the best sci-fi horrors ever! I still have to see the next recent installment, but yeah. It was brilliant! And I love how they cut out the typical horror music durign when they're all tied up, taking those blood tests. You just hear the screaming. Far creepier than with music.
Domzdream 4 months ago