win95 doesn't support reasonable amounts of ram, nor does it support almost all modern software, The reason it runs fast is because unlike win 7 its not running lots of processes essential to a modern PC (such as rapidly opening large regularly used programs, firewalls, security etc..
OSX isn't faster, don't believe everything those ppl touting overpriced goods at apple tell you.
PRICE LOL its only compatible with MAC computers - which cost two times the price of an equivalent PC so don't claim its cheaper please.
I'm geussing that your comparing your experience with a $500 PC and a $3000 Mac, bought at a later date when the tech had moved on, try a decent $1500 PC and the difference won;t be there, infact you'll likely have a better spec comp.
software compatibility of windows more than makes up for the useless 'bells and whistles' apple throws in.
Windows 7 is VERY smooth and quick, almost as quick as OSX Leopard. I love the new dock-like taskbar and Aero Peek is semi useful. The shutdown and startup times are a lot faster than Vista. However, it still is a bit slower than Leopard, especially when multitasking and shutting down. Not nearly as fast as Snow Leopard overall, but still a very solid and speedy release from Microsoft.
idiot seriously....the computers internet speed doesnt go faster with the OS, ITS THE INTERNET LINE TWAT. how dare you say that is mac like aswell....that was a really, really dumb thing u said
Actually speed in modern Operating systems is less dependant on how much system resources are used by the OS, and more to do with how much is pre-loaded by the OS into ram - which in turn makes the systems much more responsive (as it effectively loads the software before you even think to click on it.)
MORE RAM USE = BETTER sounds silly, but its free to use ram (can be instantly wiped if needed elsewhere), so it may as well be full of your most needed programs - this is what makes Win7,OSX fast
i ran beta version 7000 on on a crappy emachine with a Celeron D 3.2ghz (not dual core) an xpress 200 chipset (using its IGP the Xpress 200) and 2gb of ddr 333mhz ram and OMG it was so smooth! hard to decide what runs better on that machine win xp or win 7 beta! even ran aero with that crap xpress 200 igp flawlessly. no errors or odd artifact and best of all it was smooth! woot microsoft job well done and that was just the beta o.0 wait for the retail O.O
For me this is windows vista fixed, windows vista was afucking mess and its even better windows 2000 than the windows vista and i tryed the beta of windows seven and i have to say of i uninstall xp and change it for the seven,this is an a incredibleoperating system!!!!
The equipment I want to use with Windows 7 does not support Aero, and the maximum screen resolution is horrible. Windows Update won't fix the problem, and I can't find a better graphics driver than the generic one Windows provided. The graphics card is a part of the motherboard, so I can't upgrade it without basically getting a new PC. Running the RC on VirtualPC is sluggish; I guess I'll just wait until it's released to get to test drive the new Windows.
it's actually faster than xp vista etc because they make a copy of everything 2 times. one in hidden folders and the other is the actual file. 7 dosent
Incorrect. The new expiration date (actually June 2010) applies for the Release Candidate; the Beta will begin bi-hourly shutdowns soon and will expire a few weeks after that. This is done so you will switch to the RC if you want to keep on using Windows 7. The bi-hourly shutdowns for the RC will begin in March of next year.
its a beta,shit happens :P, windows 7 can do things much faster than xp and vista too,when theres too much shit in xp it never runs great i had a google side bar and microsoft search installed,the search was useful but used alot of resources
gonna use ubuntu and windows 7 when its out of beta
thing that pisses me off with 7 is the different type/versions of 7 there will be. Example there is a Basic, Home Premium, Ultimate, etc. I like Mac OS X's approach, selling one version
Yeah, I agree. One "great" version is what Microsoft needs to release after the Vista disaster. Also, anyone that has already had to deal with Vista should get a free upgrade from that crap. That would go a long way in repairing their image right now. I have converted 2 of my machines back to XP PRO. One more to go if this Windows 7 doesn't deliver. May even go MAC. Vista, the operating system from hell.
That used to be Microsofts approach too. Now with that multi type of OS it just sucks in my opinion. If MAC hardware wasn't so expensive I'd buy a mac, and run XP on it with MAc. It's just annoying having the different version fo windows, it's like some users are in the ghetto (home basic) and some are in beverly hills (ultimate), what happened to the days when all windows users were part of the same group (windows users), now they've split us up into what we can afford or willing to spend
But why would a home user would need a fully blown IIS7 on his machine. I think the different versions concept is right, but it should have been just like in Win XP, just two of them. What say?
only mac dock is better and doesn't take up a big part of the screen but apears if you hover your mouse on the edge of the screen. i have it on my XP. it's called objectdock and i love it. i hope Win7 doesn't crash every 2 secs like my Vista Home did. i paid 160 euros for a piece of crap
it's pretty logical for people to have to upgrade in order to be able to run new stuff. like mac OSX leopard only runs on intel macs. if you don't own an intel you are stuck at tiger 10.4.5 i think.
come on be reasonable, you can't expect an older computer to run just the newest things. that counts for all technology!
the problem with Vista was that even Computers that was pretty new, and "supported" by Vista, it wouldnt run it or had difficulties running... thats what the problem is all about.
And OSX does actually support every Intel mac, which is what? the last 10 gens?
conclusion: Vista sucks ass (especially the 64-bit version because it supports almost nothing like flash, which you need for almost every interactive website. and microsoft needs to get sued for selling millions of people an OS that doesn't work.
then PLEASE tell me how you got it to work. I am using Vista Home 64-bit Service Pack 1 and every time i try to install flash in any webbrowser it says it isn't supported, and even though installing it in iexplorer 32-bit does work, every time i use it in iexplorer it automatically shuts down...
32bit vista only detects your parts to a limit. like 3,3GB RAM max. so if you have anything above that, it isn't used. Same for other parts. therefore i had to change to a 64bit version. so i bought Home version.
xp been out for years, I have vista and had no problims with it what so ever(I never used xp),the only people who conplane are the ones with outdated hardwere.Now I'm on 7's beta and it's go so for.
Windows 7 is still under development. It has not yet been released. They have released the RC1 and you must be aware that these Betas and RCs have debugging code to track bugs that slows down the performance. Once RTM is out you can expect better performance and speed. And are you adding the processes of both the OS together or is your PC running all that manufacturer shit like webcam, disk watching, light scribe etc etc processes. you can shut them off by using Run-msconfig
of course... pretty much every new OS ever created will use up more resources and have more demanding minimal hardware specifications. This is nothing special.
No ofcourse but what I dont like with Vista and W7 is the wasting of resources. I run my computer for the applications. Why not have them run the best they can.
Windows 7 is touted as a speed demon but was 5% slower than Vista on some tests.
Again, Both were 40% slower than XP. If that is "speed demon", then the word has offically lost all its meaning.
XP all the way..
GodForGiv3n 1 year ago
but it has small compatible softwares....-_-
MultiWilliam15 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
windows 7 activation erase time hack released by the razor
team !!! dwnload at my channel! this is great for people's
time expiring, can also download the latest updates! finally
we can hack it with this stupid simple program that we've been
waiting for, just oe click and restar! download at my chanel
guys, just copy and paste the URL
amidaryu1 2 years ago
i heard negitive things about it
m14g 2 years ago
speed? this is slow as hell compared to os x. put windows 95 on a modern day computer and it will run just as fast (i did it)
aegnt09 2 years ago
win95 doesn't support reasonable amounts of ram, nor does it support almost all modern software, The reason it runs fast is because unlike win 7 its not running lots of processes essential to a modern PC (such as rapidly opening large regularly used programs, firewalls, security etc..
OSX isn't faster, don't believe everything those ppl touting overpriced goods at apple tell you.
neverfearchrisishere 2 years ago
OS X - $30
WIndows 7 - $300
OS X has more features, faster, secure, etc. Obviously you have never used a mac.
aegnt09 2 years ago
PRICE LOL its only compatible with MAC computers - which cost two times the price of an equivalent PC so don't claim its cheaper please.
I'm geussing that your comparing your experience with a $500 PC and a $3000 Mac, bought at a later date when the tech had moved on, try a decent $1500 PC and the difference won;t be there, infact you'll likely have a better spec comp.
software compatibility of windows more than makes up for the useless 'bells and whistles' apple throws in.
neverfearchrisishere 2 years ago
Actually Macs are cheeper. I'm sending a PM
aegnt09 2 years ago
LOL which quoted a mac, worse than the PC I'm using for twice the price I paid 8 months ago....
yeah, a point well made. L O L @ YOUR FACE
neverfearchrisishere 2 years ago
your so full of shit. XD
yet again, another PC user who SAYS it is but can't prove it.
aegnt09 2 years ago
Windows 7 is VERY smooth and quick, almost as quick as OSX Leopard. I love the new dock-like taskbar and Aero Peek is semi useful. The shutdown and startup times are a lot faster than Vista. However, it still is a bit slower than Leopard, especially when multitasking and shutting down. Not nearly as fast as Snow Leopard overall, but still a very solid and speedy release from Microsoft.
tootall110 2 years ago
idiot seriously....the computers internet speed doesnt go faster with the OS, ITS THE INTERNET LINE TWAT. how dare you say that is mac like aswell....that was a really, really dumb thing u said
werewolf786 2 years ago
dont be stupid he meant its fast as in it uses very little processor and memory so it completes tasks easier DUH you are a real mouthbreather
alexjustalex1 2 years ago
Actually speed in modern Operating systems is less dependant on how much system resources are used by the OS, and more to do with how much is pre-loaded by the OS into ram - which in turn makes the systems much more responsive (as it effectively loads the software before you even think to click on it.)
MORE RAM USE = BETTER sounds silly, but its free to use ram (can be instantly wiped if needed elsewhere), so it may as well be full of your most needed programs - this is what makes Win7,OSX fast
neverfearchrisishere 2 years ago
but its fast when you're NOT in internet, werewolf786
1enemyspotted1 2 years ago
Windows 7 looks so much cooler I'm using it right now.
YoungbuckRulz 2 years ago 6
i ran beta version 7000 on on a crappy emachine with a Celeron D 3.2ghz (not dual core) an xpress 200 chipset (using its IGP the Xpress 200) and 2gb of ddr 333mhz ram and OMG it was so smooth! hard to decide what runs better on that machine win xp or win 7 beta! even ran aero with that crap xpress 200 igp flawlessly. no errors or odd artifact and best of all it was smooth! woot microsoft job well done and that was just the beta o.0 wait for the retail O.O
TheOnlyDuST 2 years ago
Its ugly.
kenanball 2 years ago
For me this is windows vista fixed, windows vista was afucking mess and its even better windows 2000 than the windows vista and i tryed the beta of windows seven and i have to say of i uninstall xp and change it for the seven,this is an a incredibleoperating system!!!!
SithNai 2 years ago
The equipment I want to use with Windows 7 does not support Aero, and the maximum screen resolution is horrible. Windows Update won't fix the problem, and I can't find a better graphics driver than the generic one Windows provided. The graphics card is a part of the motherboard, so I can't upgrade it without basically getting a new PC. Running the RC on VirtualPC is sluggish; I guess I'll just wait until it's released to get to test drive the new Windows.
TheMexicanMofo 2 years ago
or you can buy a graphics card... install it on ur pc,and use that instead of ur crappy integrated one,then u don't have to buy a new pc :P
and you don't need an expensive one
drinkbudyXD 2 years ago
it's actually faster than xp vista etc because they make a copy of everything 2 times. one in hidden folders and the other is the actual file. 7 dosent
wwewil 2 years ago
the new expiration date was extended to march 2 2010
clanton14th 3 years ago
Incorrect. The new expiration date (actually June 2010) applies for the Release Candidate; the Beta will begin bi-hourly shutdowns soon and will expire a few weeks after that. This is done so you will switch to the RC if you want to keep on using Windows 7. The bi-hourly shutdowns for the RC will begin in March of next year.
TheMexicanMofo 2 years ago
look MOFO im not gonna use it all the way til june the reason why i wrote march 2nd is because the screen will turn off every 2 hours
clanton14th 2 years ago
starting march 2010
clanton14th 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
new windows 7 build 7065 RC1 is gonna leak soon check my video for details!!!
clanton14th 3 years ago
its a beta,shit happens :P, windows 7 can do things much faster than xp and vista too,when theres too much shit in xp it never runs great i had a google side bar and microsoft search installed,the search was useful but used alot of resources
gonna use ubuntu and windows 7 when its out of beta
drinkbudyXD 3 years ago
thing that pisses me off with 7 is the different type/versions of 7 there will be. Example there is a Basic, Home Premium, Ultimate, etc. I like Mac OS X's approach, selling one version
Johncar435 3 years ago
Yeah, I agree. One "great" version is what Microsoft needs to release after the Vista disaster. Also, anyone that has already had to deal with Vista should get a free upgrade from that crap. That would go a long way in repairing their image right now. I have converted 2 of my machines back to XP PRO. One more to go if this Windows 7 doesn't deliver. May even go MAC. Vista, the operating system from hell.
lookahere 3 years ago
That used to be Microsofts approach too. Now with that multi type of OS it just sucks in my opinion. If MAC hardware wasn't so expensive I'd buy a mac, and run XP on it with MAc. It's just annoying having the different version fo windows, it's like some users are in the ghetto (home basic) and some are in beverly hills (ultimate), what happened to the days when all windows users were part of the same group (windows users), now they've split us up into what we can afford or willing to spend
DesertRidgeline 3 years ago
true. too many versions divide us.
wilwad 2 years ago
But why would a home user would need a fully blown IIS7 on his machine. I think the different versions concept is right, but it should have been just like in Win XP, just two of them. What say?
kushkashayp 2 years ago
"Almost Apple Mac like." I vow never to use Windows 7 then.
dodododa 3 years ago
i agree, thingy at the bottom is just like mac dock
macbookpromaniac 3 years ago
only mac dock is better and doesn't take up a big part of the screen but apears if you hover your mouse on the edge of the screen. i have it on my XP. it's called objectdock and i love it. i hope Win7 doesn't crash every 2 secs like my Vista Home did. i paid 160 euros for a piece of crap
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
lol i wanted to buy vista when it just came out but something holded me back :P
macbookpromaniac 3 years ago
well im not saying i agree with vista but obviously you have a shit computer if it keeps crashing
zomgsweetH4xz0r 3 years ago
2,8Ghz Quad core
4GB RAM
Geforce 9800GTX 512MB
640GB HDD
that's not crappy.. it's the 64-bit version of vista that is crappy. just the fact that i'm running 32-bit XP on it without problems proves that.
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
touché
zomgsweetH4xz0r 3 years ago
All you need now is a dual core over a single core and loads more ram, and a bigger hard drive to store it all.
Yeah...what an obvious improvement. *sarcasm*
mailer666 3 years ago
it's pretty logical for people to have to upgrade in order to be able to run new stuff. like mac OSX leopard only runs on intel macs. if you don't own an intel you are stuck at tiger 10.4.5 i think.
come on be reasonable, you can't expect an older computer to run just the newest things. that counts for all technology!
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
just a thing to add:
the problem with Vista was that even Computers that was pretty new, and "supported" by Vista, it wouldnt run it or had difficulties running... thats what the problem is all about.
And OSX does actually support every Intel mac, which is what? the last 10 gens?
TheBrokenEclipse 3 years ago
Comment removed
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
conclusion: Vista sucks ass (especially the 64-bit version because it supports almost nothing like flash, which you need for almost every interactive website. and microsoft needs to get sued for selling millions of people an OS that doesn't work.
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
yep!
and i think that someone doesnt like your oppinions xD
TheBrokenEclipse 3 years ago
IT SUPPORTS FLASH! I wouldn't be watching this vid if it didn't.
techkid4473 3 years ago
then PLEASE tell me how you got it to work. I am using Vista Home 64-bit Service Pack 1 and every time i try to install flash in any webbrowser it says it isn't supported, and even though installing it in iexplorer 32-bit does work, every time i use it in iexplorer it automatically shuts down...
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
and i am talking about 64bit vista. i know 32bit vista runs flash prefectly, cause i used to run it on my old computer which ran 32bit vista ultimate
thatsmeovertheree 3 years ago
Why would you downgrade from Vista Ultimate to Vista Home, anyway? :/
raynes94 2 years ago
32bit vista only detects your parts to a limit. like 3,3GB RAM max. so if you have anything above that, it isn't used. Same for other parts. therefore i had to change to a 64bit version. so i bought Home version.
thatsmeovertheree 2 years ago
no it does run on PowerPC, not sure about snow leopard but I suspect it also run on powerpc.
zectoid 2 years ago
vista you piece of shit
AnyeongF91 3 years ago
I have vista on a laptop and desktop and have XP on 2 other laptop including the Acer1 I got today. XP is significantly faster but god I love Vista.
reptile411 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Very nice video and on my website you can use mobile search to get info and rec promotions on any phone. Just go to my profile to access my site.
emailgrowth 3 years ago
also check out gNewSense and run that first if it works for you
lvecsey 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Wow there is a lot bullshit going around about windows 7.
Infoworld did a test of performance on Vista, XP and 7. Which came out on top?
XP (of course.)
CognosSquare 3 years ago
xp been out for years, I have vista and had no problims with it what so ever(I never used xp),the only people who conplane are the ones with outdated hardwere.Now I'm on 7's beta and it's go so for.
GAMEBOIMARCUS 3 years ago
The test showed Vista and 7 40% slower than XP.
I have a new computer and I enjoy XP because its fast, responsive, stable. Still not as fast as my linux though.
Vista and 7 have 100 background processes weighing in at 650 Mb RAM actual usage. My XP is at 97 MB with 26 processes.
And btw try running Daemon Tools on W7. It bugs out into a loop of reinstalling and rebooting.
CognosSquare 3 years ago
Windows 7 is still under development. It has not yet been released. They have released the RC1 and you must be aware that these Betas and RCs have debugging code to track bugs that slows down the performance. Once RTM is out you can expect better performance and speed. And are you adding the processes of both the OS together or is your PC running all that manufacturer shit like webcam, disk watching, light scribe etc etc processes. you can shut them off by using Run-msconfig
kushkashayp 2 years ago
No manufacturer shit. Just plain OS shit and a 3rd party firewall.
My prediction is W7 will be slower and slower as more and more patches are applied as usual. Like that hunk of shit Vista.
CognosSquare 2 years ago
of course... pretty much every new OS ever created will use up more resources and have more demanding minimal hardware specifications. This is nothing special.
detached9 3 years ago
No ofcourse but what I dont like with Vista and W7 is the wasting of resources. I run my computer for the applications. Why not have them run the best they can.
Windows 7 is touted as a speed demon but was 5% slower than Vista on some tests.
Again, Both were 40% slower than XP. If that is "speed demon", then the word has offically lost all its meaning.
CognosSquare 3 years ago
I will stay with Ubuntu Linux.
teddyhcraig 3 years ago
Comment removed
stephenpallotta 3 years ago